Japanese Military in World War II and U.S. Military In Vietnam
War
Head this morning's confrontation about my 3-Stars Strategist title
My response: I was recruited as a U.S. Military 3-Stars Strategist
because my understanding of Japanese Military outstanding performance in World
War II and U.S. Military's mistake in Vietnam War. The interview was conducted
at the spot of the January of 2004 meeting.
Heard the saying about I
can only keep my 3-stars if I was retired from U.S. military.
My response: That is the
reason my life time achievement was mentioned the other day. It means I have
kept my 3-stars General's privilege as no-longer enlisted since July 1st of
2004 when my stars were taken back.
Why Japanese Military, in my understanding, better performed than
the commonly acknowledged best performed German Military in World War II?
My response: Japanese Military's "United We Face It" is
the reason that there are no reserved resources or discounted carried out
orders to comprise Japanese Military Strategists plans.
German Military famous for their swift actions benefited by their
obviously advanced firearms and equipment.
I once read in an article that Japan went into World War II was
not from Japanese Military's ambition, and Japanese Military went in because of
their Generals' unsuccessful efforts to convince Japanese Government not to. In
that article, it mentioned that because of that debate of not going to the war,
Japanese Military was in the situation need to prove if they had been decent
military stands for Japan's proud, or all its personnel should just to commit
suicide to finish in shame. That is the reason that Japanese Military had this
never-before "United We Face It". I used several examples in January
of 2004's conference:
1: Pearl
Harbor. There were 3000 pilots did not divert their flights during their long
trip from Japan to Pearl Harbor, not even one diverted when they were not under
valid supervision. War planes only had enough gasoline equipped to save engine
power to support the long-distance flight and that was the reason remaining
gasoline together with the war planes were the attacking "bombs".
2: Pearl
Harbor attacker pilots from Japan Air Force carried out this order was to let
Japan Navy be the power in the Sea. This order was carried out without any
reserves.
Europe was in war already that British Navy or French Navy were
busy of their own fights against German and Italy, Pearl Harbor attack
compromised U.S. Navy force to a large degree.
Without by-passing Europe, U.S could not participate any actions
against Japanese Military.
Japan was announced Alley with Germany and Italy before Pearl
Harbor attack by its diplomats’ efforts.
3: Tons of
fights in Japanese wars in Asia that Japanese Military carried out when its
Navy needed to pave ways for its Army, its Air Force needed to strike to let
its Navy to survive, and Japanese Army just conquer its obstacles with full
forces. All these fights were carried out without any reserve but with all it took.
4: It had
been a nightmare in Asia in World War II time, with almost entire Asia fought
against Japanese Military, the small personnel numbered Japanese Military
fought like this everywhere they were ordered to fight.
5: Without
Nucleus bomb, Japan Military still got what it takes to continue its fights for
an imaginably long enough time.
U.S military had been in wars outside U.S several times, why Vietnam war was its pain?
My response: I am martial art fan, and this had been a question
since I read General McArthur's autobiography.
General McArthur was the commander of Korean War. U.S military's
role in this war was similar with its role in Vietnam war, to help its Southern
government to fight against its Northern Communist government. Why U.S.
military was enemy like to almost every Vietnamese whenever Vietnam war was
mentioned while Korean's Southern government was understood as Korean's
Northerners fought against whenever Korean war was discussed.
In that book, it says General McArthur always took military
actions together with Korean Southern Military which sometimes comprised
results.
My puzzle about Vietnam on this was answered in January of 2004's
conference that there were some reasons that U.S military often had to take
actions alone in Vietnam.
I said, "This was possibly the reason all these actions taken
by U.S military alone were understood as invasion."
I said if you look into China's WWII history of its
Japanese-Chinese War, you would get it that not just people in Vietnam Northern
Military's uniform, but every single Vietnamese would fight against U.S. military
if understood as invasion. U.S. military did not get this was the reason cause
U.S. military in big trouble in Vietnam.