Home

Three elements to recognize if it is an opportunity to succeed:

1) Can you understand the frustration expressed during the conversation to identify the possible causes of the frustration?

2) Can you identify if you can offer some help from your knowledge, experiences, and expertise?

3) Can you effectively communicate your expertise to be understood as possible helpful solutions?

----Min Fang, July 10th of 2019


Featured Articles

The Value of Intellecutal Input -- The O'Connor family's shared confusion is the reason for some O'Connor-s' frustration.

The Value of Intellectual Input -- The O'Connor family's shared confusion is the reason for some O'Connor-s' frustration.


Heard this morning's talk about notorious Tina O'Connor's "successfully conceived" story.
My response: My own biological children are factually not biologically associated with her birth children.

----April 5th, 2018

Heard this morning's talk about if my inheriting complete.
My response: It is none of anyone's business because I am the sole beneficiary person of the Trusts I have inherited. No confusion if there is any other possible beneficiary person so that there is no eligible person to confront anything about my inheriting. The money in those Trusts is none of anyone's business at all.

I am the sole lawful owner of those Trusts that set up for me by my grandfathers before I was born.

----April 5th, 2018 (updated on April 8th, 2018).


The O'Connor family's shared confusion is the reason for some O'Connor-s' frustration.
My explanation: To me, it seems O'Connor family's shared confusion is their great-grandfathers' contributions have been under-valued.

Also, it seems that some O'Connors' frustration is these arguments on what is appropriate recognization has gone beyond the boundary. By the way, these frustrated O'Connors are Politics profession O'Connor-s, Attorney profession O'Connor-s, and Accounting profession O'Connor-s.

Let me do the explanation on what I heard of.

About 200 years ago, there was a chance that the young United States needed a railroad. The company set up a team to compete for this opportunity with some other companies. The team worked as business representatives of the company to make all the contacts and to arrange all the necessary meetings, it took them over a year to present the company to be good enough for this railroad deal.

Well, Senator O'Connor's significant contribution was achieved quickly but not easily. Senator O'Connor's great vision and explicit points were expressed clearly by his robust elaboration to make everyone understood the importance of reaching this deal with the company. He achieved this deal by only several of his great speeches.

I heard both the representing team from the company and Senator O'Connor were greatly appreciated by the company. The appreciation was understood as appropriate by both the representing team and Senator O'Connor at the time.

The frustrated arguments I have been participating is O'Connor family shared confusion if their great-grandfather's contribution to the company has been undervalued because that deal was the fundamental reason of why the company is this great today.

Well, being a new immigrant who has not participated the glorious developing history of the company, all I could hear from these arguments have been "the Chinese don't deserve anything". And my frustration has been that O'Connor family can't ignore the fact it is the Trust I inherited that has been participating the funding to all these great achievements. I understand I have not sweated for this company's growth but I deserve to point out that the Trust I inherited is my ancient grandfather's hard-earned, and I do share the company's enthusiasm to support O'Connor family to devote themselves to serve the United States when O'Connor-s' talents were needed but public posts were not paid-jobs .

The reason of current argument if Senator O'Connor's contribution has been undervalued that O'Connor family deserve to have the entire ownership or some ownership of the company to justify it, to my understanding, is that some O'Connor-s have ignored the facts that it has been everyone else's sweats in that company to make that signed railroad contract a real transportation. To my understanding, this is precisely the reason some O'Connor-s are really frustrated about this beyond boundary argument.

The fact is it was the construction crews on the field sweating to lay down the logs, that fact is it was the management team who overseeing the logs been sent to the worksite, the fact is it was the administration team who ensuring those logs and construction crews got paid on time, the fact is it was the entire company's sweats to ensure those tracks kept on extending. O'Connor family can't deny it has been everyone's contribution to make the company this great today. Some said, well, the everybody employed by the company only got paid by salaries. I say, well, all those invested-in money only yield at an average of 5%-7% a year. *This Trust I inherited in 2004 has been investing in this American company through its parent company for about 400 years now.

By the way, I got the similar frustrations about my Intellectual Incomes from those frustrated O'Connor-s who understand it has been the sweats from the entire company. These frustrated O'Connor-s are the ones who have supported the understanding that it is the sweats from the hard working people in those companies that made Taiwan's touching glass an industry, not my two minutes brief "neuron talk", or my half an hour smartphone annoying conversation.

Well, I say to these frustrated O'Connor-s that if they believe their own great-grandfather's great vision and explicit points were the real contributions to the company, the same greatness as their own contributions they are currently making in their own professions, please don't say my hard-earned intellectual incomes are nonsenses. I have sweated 5 years in a medical college and another 2-plus-5 years in computer science to have the knowledge & vision to make that half an hour talk.

----April 5th, 2018