Background of the 1980s in the People's Republic of China
1980s time in the People's Republic of China was like a no-law country with a lot of issues. Due to the national economic system conversion from the planned economy to the market economy, the main economic system was spinning out workers without any possible chances for those been spanned out to find a way to survive (no pension, no social security and not a chance to find a job*).
A lot of people were, possibly, desperately trying to find some resources to support their families. Some took advantage of the government's policies of encouraging private business. And in this process, tons of people being taken advantages of without knowing what happened which may include college professors or Science Academy Scientists' inventions or patents, etc. 1989 student movement may be the outbreak of a lot of tensions but somehow missed the points.
* In the 1980s, there were not many foreign investments yet. Healthy business (factory or company) were selected to be kept in the main economic system, the less or no profiting ones were spanned out, either to be independent or up for sale. So if a worker was laid off, it was because the factory or company could not afford to pay the salary (wage), and those businesses in the main system only recruit newly graduated from junior high schools, high schools or colleges. So, for the laid-off workers, it means no retirement pension from the factory or the company that laid this worker off, no social security from the government and not a chance to find a job, the laid-off worker could invest some money to become a street vendor or could buy a for-sale factory (company), or this laid-off worker would just have no place to turn to have any income.
* I graduated from high school in 1985 and graduated from a 5-years' pharmacology major from a medical college in 1990. I came to the United States in October 1996. I was the person reported to the then Chinese central government in early 1989 that 1989 Student movement against some government officials' corruption was suspicious because there was no reported major corruption case at all in 1988-1989 that could cause such outbreak. I was the person participated 1989's government meeting and gave my advices as an in-college Communist Youth Party member student to the government that led by Chinese Communist Party which shaped government's handling of 1989 student movement.
* I was the person pointed out in that 1989 meeting, organized by the Chinese government, that students' marching and blocking the streets activities would drag some healthy business into less profiting situation that may further worsen already pretty bad economic situation and cause more workers to be laid-off into financial desperation. And I was the person reported that collection of the donations from the streets were suspicious.
----Dec. 29th, 2017
PRC80 Style advices "I would rather advise you to call yourself a true beggar".
My response:This is obviously to shit somebody. Some PRC80 Scheme style advises are not this obvious. Example: Everyone is curious if I have money under entrust, why do I choose to be homeless? I said I didn't choose but advised, and I did call law enforcement's help to find out who advised me. I heard recently that it was advised by a Chinese male, I heard he was featured a possible heir from Zu's family on the radio program this year. His last name is also Fang(方) but he has no blood association with me at all.
That advise he gave sounds malicious who knew what this advise means, but not a bit to someone like me who know nothing about what it would be like to be a "homeless". It was sound like an adventure to me.
The key is if you know what the advise means. For example, if the advice of "just amputate the entire leg" is given when one is complaining about own leg pain, the one being advised certainly know immediately that is malicious. But if the same effect advice is given as "just stop local blood circulation completely to lower the sensitivity of the nerves", it may be taken without any guards.
This is the PRC80 Scheme advise style. Most of the time, this kind advices are given to promote advicers to make some gains, sometimes, this kind advices are given purely just out of hatred.
----Dec. 29th, 2017
Heard yesterday and today that messages both impressively were from the United States government.
My response: I heard about it yesterday late in the day, so I explain it here today.
Yesterday's reason was Albert Gore, he very politely addressed himself "was a Vice President of the United States for a reason", but his current "decision" that I don't deserve to be acknowledged as part of smartphone creator group is still the "decision from the United States government". Otherwise, this is purely U.S. intellectual properties related laws matter, not the United States' national matter that needs the United States government decision.
This morning's "government decision" is from treasure department conversation that made some Chinese government representatives conclusion of the discussion became "the United States government decision".
I heard that this whole week's featured episodes reflected a lot of people's frustration for the past 10 years "Are they (featured patrons) Alzheimer patients?" And my frustration has been: "That is a psycho ". The theme of this week's radio broadcasting should be called:"Do you hear what I hear? Is that an Alzheimer or a psycho?" Let's see the following example of what has been broadcasted on the radio this week.
How a law professional Albert Gore can be the Computer Science professional-evaluation eligible?
My response: The one and only reason for his eligibility to evaluate everyone's intellectual income is impossibly hard-earned is what he had stated very confidently on the radio, the statement that you have heard clearly from the radio: Just because he declared himself "was a Vice President that led the United States for a reason".
By rumor, Albert Gore has fathered a Chinese diplomat's child and married her in P.R.China recently (registry marriage). That Chinese diplomat is the Chinese wife that Albert Gore announced he is married to on the radio program.
And if you ask around in Chinese Mainland Community, what he did is a typical and famous 1980s Chinese Iron-Steel business style: squeeze himself into the smartphone contributing group by crediting his contribution of pointing out I am being the fake one in order to take some money from Smartphones' business contributing shares.
The illustration of typical 1980s Chinese Iron-Steel business style is: whenever and wherever and whoever, as long as there is a conversation talking about a possible money-making business, a complete irrelevant person would seek chance to be in the conversation either by throwing a universal applicable commenting line to "contribute" or to exclude someone already in the conversation group. This is to ensure to have a good reason to have some money share and to reduce possible sharing parties.
Now, trying to remember what was broadcasted yesterday, and analyze the points that Albert Gore pointed out: I am a commenting only in the discussion about smartphone on June 30th of 2004 which certainly makes me a fake contributor. He knew I was performing as if I knew was because he was a Vice President that led the United States for a reason.
I was the person initiated the conversation of smartphones by alerting everyone that there were some new inventions of mini-computer hardware from Intel company. And the conversation continued on how to use these new inventions to make a cellphone a smartphone. I am the original in-conversation group that Albert Gore trying to exclude, and I already accused him took my share of smartphone invention fee deposited into his own possession or gave out as he wished since 2007 or so.
Invention was Never Easy -- About Smartphones and Wipes
Almost every one of my intellectual income, I earned it by initiating the conversation of having the business and also earned it by contributing on how to make it a good business.
Now, trying to remember what the Taiwanese woman, Wang, Xuehong*(王雪红), said yesterday about her contribution in there: She was an MBA graduated, and her husband is electronic engineering professional that knew cellphone chips. It was a smartphone invention that was discussed, not some computer software programming, it is impossible that I can contribute anything in there. It is obviously the same technique.
But the problem is those mini hardwares were invented by Intel, not her husband. And the entire discussion was about how to use these newly invented mini hardwares to turn a cellphone to a smart one that can have functions like a mini computer which certainly means the discussion was all about a software called a computer's operating system.
And if you heard she, by rumors, was the famous person known for "deserved to be in any smartphone conversation with a camcorder to record everyone's discussion", you knew this is the same the People's Republic of China Iron-Steel business style: "I already heard your information, I do not need your any contribution." which implies you are ousted from any possible profiting from what has been recorded. Her father was known for having some investments in the People's Republic of China since 1980 or so.
*Not certain if the name is correct. The father is Wang, Yongqing(王永庆），I am not certain which daughter.
----Dec. 28th, 2017