My response: If that is my inheritance, it is not anyone else to give out; This is by LAWS. Whoever made this announcement need to be corrected publicly.
----May 30th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about the Chinese guy who I got nothing to do.
My response: Heard he had married to a 30 years old and share a child with her, but divorced because she deserve some money by letting him registered illegally to me. If this rumor is true, I, Min Fang, sincerely request as a US citizen to remove this invalid illegal marriage registry. There is no such child(ren) carry his blood who also carry my blood. All by factual.
----May 30th, 2017
听说景天早上广播剧讲的是1988年我在上海见过一面的小贺。
我的回应：听说他是和一个三十多岁的结的婚还有了一个小孩。也听说女方要求法律上离婚但仍和小贺同居。听说今天早上的广播剧宣布着同一个小贺居然和我有婚姻登记，我方敏赶紧郑重申明：“如此传言有据，此婚姻登记属非法无效，我方敏以美国公民身份郑重要求去除此非法无效登记的记录。” 没有任何一个小孩承载他的血液同时也承载我方敏血液。一切以事实为依据。
----2017年5月30日。
What about the money? what money must and has already been under his name?
My response: Heard that is not my investment or inheritance entrusted in China. Heard it is 1% tax incentives. Now you see what is the problem. It sounds like they used my name to have this tax incentive but have not intention to let me receive this money. This 1% tax incentives is government reward to individuals who contributed greatly to local economic development according to Tax laws. It suppose only reward to individuals who qualify（government employees are excluded).
---May 30th, 2017
广播剧讲的是什么钱必须并且已经转到他的名下？
我的回应：听说那不是我在中国的投资或我爷爷们信托在中国的钱。听说是1%的税务奖励。现在听明白问题在哪儿了吧。听起来好像是他们用我的名义拿到了1%的税务奖励但没打算把钱给我。这%的税务奖励是一句税法奖励对地区经济发展有杰出贡献的个人。应该是只奖给符合条件者（国家公务员不在考虑范围内）。
----2017年5月30日。
我就一直说这中国政府在全世界组织的这场演出基本上是：用"一本正经事实阐述"手法，通过表现花痴症状("谁都在馋又老又干的中国公民男女还馋的口水嗒嗒的”），甲状腺亢进症状（吵个没停叫”辩论，叫“真理越辩越明“）来讲述严重精神分裂似的故事观点（“中国政府整个就是腐败下三滥的妓女婊子地痞流氓呀”)。我今天早上都已经痛骂“中国政府国家领导人是妓女婊子养的杂种才会认为只要有洞就应该拿别人的钱。”
----2017年5月30日。