Heard this morning's British Royal's Historical Issue.（中文附后）
My response: This is a truly historically issue that well known before the young and handsome British Prince and I were born.
The issue started in eighteen century Queen Victoria time regarding East India Company's financier. British Prince's argument today was that it was by law in 1900 already that any entrust over 500 years old can be considered as no-owner fund.
My argument today was can be considered as no-owner does not mean it is no owner. By law, a missing person can be considered dead if missing over certain time, but that does not mean this person has to be dead if one day this person finally showed up.
I inherited all my grandfathers' entrusts according to their wills on June 30th 2004 and I re-entrusted my inherited wealth on July 1st of 2004 to original entrusting groups, aka before June 30th of 2004 groups, of attorneys and accountants.
British are known for taking care of historical issues very romantically since Queen Victoria time, I must be very unattractive to the young and handsome British Prince to be rejected after being mentioned.
----Sept 15th, 2017
Some O'Connors argument on my July 1st of 2004's entrust was never acknowledged by Attorney O'Connor.
My response: That is because Attorney O'Connor is not part of the original entrusting group that representing the entrusters (my grandfathers), aka before June 30th of 2004 groups, and Attorney O'Connor is not part of the entrusting group that representing the entruster (me) after I entrusted my wealth on July 1st of 2004.
There are several American funds are my inheritances because those funds were set up by my grandfathers' entrusts that I inherited.
Attorney O'Connor had been attorney representing three of my inherited funds' American child funds, but he is not entrusting attorney to any of my inheritances and he is not entrusting attorney of any of my inheritances' American child funds.
Attorney O'Connor, his attorney father and his attorney grandfathers had never been my grandfathers' entrusts' entrusting attorneys to represent my grandfathers. Attorney O'Connor was never my entrusting attorney to represent me.
----Sept 15th, 2017
Heard Albert Gore deserve to have some money because his father had worked for one of my inheritance fund's American child fund.
My response: Albert Gore and his friends' arguments that this fund should provide for Albert Gore's family living cost based on his father's 10 years work history has been ridiculous.
This privately owned fund is never part of U.S. Social Security's benefits.
I have accused Albert Gore's father's and uncle's attorney firms had abused attorneys' power to disadvantage my interests during 10 years time when they were hired to represent this American Fund.
This American Fund may have been managing retirement funds including funds invested by Social Security, but this privately owned American Fund is not part of U.S. Social Security or its benefits.
Albert Gore's father's and uncle's attorney firms had been hired as contracted attorney firms and had been paid as contractors' price. Employees of these attorney firms were never part of this American fund's staff.
There are no this-American-Fund's-employees'-only-business-spending, and there are no this-American-Fund's-employees'-only-pensions, and there are no this-American-fund's-employees-only-401K-contributions that should ever be considered as any contractors' benefits
By the way, the O'Connor's family had been contracted attorney firms, the same as above.
----Sept 15th, 2015
“勾三股四玄五" in this dynasty's Emperor's authored book <Zhoubisuanjing>（Principle: if a rectangular triangle's two shore sides are 3 and 4 means the long side is 5)
Heard Albert Gore deserve to have some money because his father had worked for one of my inheritance fund's American child fund.
My response: Albert Gore and his friends' arguments that this fund should provide for Albert Gore's family living cost based on his father's 10 years work history has been ridiculous.
This privately owned fund is never part of U.S. Social Security's benefits.
I have accused Albert Gore's father's and uncle's attorney firms had abused attorneys' power to disadvantage my interests during 10 years time when they were hired to represent this American Fund.
This American Fund may have been managing retirement funds including funds invested by Social Security, but this privately owned American Fund is not part of U.S. Social Security or its benefits.
Albert Gore's father's and uncle's attorney firms had been hired as contracted attorney firms and had been paid as contractors' price. Employees of these attorney firms were never part of this American fund's staff.
There are no this-American-Fund's-employees'-only-business-spending, and there are no this-American-Fund's-employees'-only-pensions, and there are no this-American-fund's-employees-only-401K-contributions that should ever be considered as any contractors' benefits
By the way, the O'Connor's family had been contracted attorney firms, the same as above.
----Sept 15th, 2015
Heard this morning's mention of Beijing Olympic Game's Opening's "Original Source" speech.
My response: I am very curious about it.
There is ancient Zhou dynasty that one of my grandmother was decedent from, a fifteen hundreds years time in between. This dynasty's Emperors were famous mathematicians and were famous for good in Stars alignments' readings in Chines History.
Fenshui is from one of this dynasty's Emperor's authored book <ZhouYi>.
“勾三股四玄五" in this dynasty's Emperor's authored book <Zhoubisuanjing>（Principle: if a rectangular triangle's two shore sides are 3 and 4 means the long side is 5)
There was some speculation about if Mediterranean god Zous is an Emperor from this Chinese dynasty and pronounced as "Zous (Zhou's)", I checked online and found out it seems possible from time in history (Zhou dynasty is between 1000BC-700BC). There is a Chinese God is from this dynasty's Emperor (周文王).
It is interesting, this Zhou dynasty is famous for its mathematics development and music instrument development (based on mathematics calculation of tone accuracy).
Han dynasty is famous for agriculture engineering, Tang dynasty is famous for music, poets and paintings.
These dynasties' Emperors are famous for their achievements in their own dynasties specialties.
My grandfather was college majored in building architecture and he could draw;
My Father was Chinese military's mapping specialist and is college majored in astrophysics;
I myself is college majored in pharmacology (an engineer like in healthcare industry) and graduated in Computer Science (mathematics related).
My father was an Editor to Chinese Astrophysics magazine, and I have "my chats collection" featured through this radio program, I do not know anything about my grandfather's literature side. Possibly Since this grandfather of mine, we are no longer educated by private tutors on Chinaology that covers Chinese Literature, Chinese music, Chinese Philosophy, etc.
What I am trying to say is we do not biologically featured our known grandfathers, but resemble a lot to mysterious Zhou dynasty Emperors who were our ancient grandmother's side grandfathers( this is for certain).
----Sept 15th, 2017
听说了今天早上提到的我和英国王室历史上的纠纷。
我的回应：这确实是众所周知的一个很历史的纠纷，这纠纷悠久到了远在年轻英俊的英国王子和我出生之前就已经存在了。
这个纠纷是从18世纪的维多利亚女王时期就已经存在，就是围绕英国东印度公司投资人的一些争执。英国王子今天所表达的争议是早在1900年就已经有法律规定信托超过500年的基金可以被认为是无主的基金。
我和我的律师们今天所表达的观点就是说“可以被认为是无主并不是说就一定必须是无主”。按照法律，一个人失踪一段时间后可以被认为已死亡，但是如果这人有一天又活着出现了，这人可不是必须得死。
我是在2004年6月30日这天按我爷爷们的遗嘱继承了我所有爷爷们的信托，我是在2004年的7月1日这天将我继承的财产又信托给了原来的（也就是2004年6月30日前）那些代表我爷爷们（信托人）的信用委托律师代表们和信托委托会计师代表们。
从维多利亚女王的时代开始，英国人就以特备擅长用浪漫手法解决历史纠纷而闻名，我一定是太不吸引年轻英俊的英国王子了，才会在被做媒提亲后又被如此拒绝了。
----2017年9月15日。
有一些O'Connors的争议就是我在2004年7月1日的信托从未被接收，
我的回应：O’Connor律师不属于2004年6月30日以前的代表信托人（我爷爷们）的信托团队，也不属于我在2004年7月1日所信托的代表我的信托团队。
有一些美国基金是我所继承的财富，就是因为这些美国基金是由我所继承的我爷爷们的信托基金所设立的子基金。
O'Connor律师曾经代表了我所继承的我的三个爷爷们的信托所设立的美国子基金，是基金公司的律师代表，但他从来不是我所继承的任何信托基金的代表信托人（我和我爷爷们）的信用委托律师，他也从来不是我所继承的任何信托基金美国子基金的代表信托人（我和我爷爷们）的信用委托律师。
O'Connor律师，他的律师父亲及他的律师爷爷们从来都不是我爷爷们所设立的任何信托基金的代表信托人（我爷爷们）的信用委托代表律师，也从来都不是我所继承并再次信托的的任何信托基金的代表信托人（我）的信用委托代表律师。
----2017年9月15日
听说了阿尔伯特·高尔就是应该有点钱因为他的父亲曾今在我所继承的一个基金里做过。
我的回应：阿尔伯特·高尔和他的朋友们的观点就是这个美国基金看在他的父亲替这个公司做了已经满十年的份上就应该为阿尔伯特·高尔家庭提供生活费用。
这个美国基金从来不是美国社保福利的一部分。
我一直指责阿尔伯特·高尔父亲和叔叔的律师公司在他们受雇佣代表这家美国基金期间，滥用律师权力损害了我作为他们律师业务的客户利益。
这家美国基金有可能有经营一些退休基金及美国社安署社保基金所投资的基金，但这家私人拥有的基金从来不是美国社安社保署或者美国社会福利的一部分。
阿尔伯特·高尔的父亲的及他叔叔的律师公司是以律师公司身份作为这家美国基金的受雇佣的律师咨询公司，阿尔伯特·高尔的父亲的及他叔叔的律师公司的雇员从来不是这家美国基金公司的雇员。
任何这家美国基金公司雇员才够资格使用的公费支出，任何这家美国基金公司雇员才够资格参与的公司退休金计划，任何这家美国基金公司雇员才够资格参与的401K计划的公司投入部分，都不属于这家美国基金的任何承包商的福利一部分。
顺便提一句，O'Conno家也是以承包商律师公司身份被雇佣为基金的代表律师的，和上面提到的是同一个情况。
----2017年9月15日。