06-30-2018 我对于家一些故事的不理解 （What I don't understand about Yu's families)
听说了今天早上所谈的于家。（Heard this morning's talk about Yu's families)
我的回应：我听说的是于家1964年已经开始查询我爷爷在香港的钱财藏在哪里，1965年已在想办法将我爷爷的上海财产转入于家自己名下，我爷爷在1965年时在上海报警是我父亲的弟妹们可以顺利拿到我爷爷的遗嘱所分配家产的原因。(My response: I heard Yu's family had been sniffing around where Hong Kong money had been in 1964 and intended to transfer my grandfather's Shanghai money into Yu's family's bank account. My grandfather called Shanghai law enforcement was the reason my father's siblings inherited their inheritable according to my grandfather's wills.)
我听说的是我爷爷1965年向上海警方报警时不承认这位于姓私人助理的妻子是我爷爷自己的骨肉血脉小孩。我听说我爷爷1965年在向上海警方报警时一字未提香港信托。我听说于姓私人助理是从我父亲弟妹处得知我爷爷有钱放在了香港。(I heard my grandfather denied his fatherhood to the wife of his private assistant Yu in his account to the Shanghai law enforcement and he did not mention Hong Kong money at all. I heard the private assistant Yu heard about Hong Kong money from my father's siblings.)
我最近听说，根据DNA鉴定，我爷爷的于姓私人助理和我曾祖父的于姓保镖是亲生父子关系（听说两人不是户籍父子关系）。(I heard recently that my grandfather's private assistant was the biological son of my great grandfather's security Yu by DNA test result. I heard they were not legally registered as the father and son.)
这些都是可以通过当年警方的档案及DNA鉴定予以核实的，所有材料的真伪也都是可以做司法鉴定的。(All these should be able to be verified by the police records as well as the DNA test results, and the authentication of the documents can certainly be verified by forensics.)
我就是不太明白这个于姓私人助理为什么会和我爷爷要钱，为什么会将我爷爷的钱全算成他自己的，闹到我爷爷要报警的地步，于姓私人助理是个拿工资受雇佣的私人助理，怎么会去想我爷爷的钱？就像现在这个美国公司的事情，于家不屑解释他们当年凭什么扣留了我的生活费用却一再高调强调他们就是应该继续拿钱，凭什么呀？(I just don't understand this: Being an employed private assistant, a work relationship person to my grandfather, why private assistant Yu would demand my grandfather's wealth? why this private assistant would consider my grandfather's wealth to be his own so seriously enough that prompted my grandfather called Shanghai law enforcement's help? Why would he feel so comfortable he should want my grandfather's wealth? Just like current American Fund company's story, Yu's families have no need at all to explain why they detained my providing but strongly argue with emphasis that they should continually receive good money to be provided by the American company, why is this?)
但我也听说了我母亲的结婚礼物就是在1966年时由这个于姓私人助理送到了南京，只是我母亲没有拿到而已。(But I also heard my mother's wedding gift was sent to Nanjing to my mother by this same private assistant Yu in 1966, my mother did not receive it because of other reasons.)
我听说的是：我奶奶因为食物造成不适是被于姓私人助理发现后送进医院的，据说于家认为我们一家应该就此永远感恩不尽，可我奶奶进了医院就再没回家而是在医院去世了，没因为被于姓私人助理发现就捡了一条命活着回家，我奶奶没有因为于姓私人助理而活着回家，我们家凭什么就因为于姓私人助理拿着工资做了他该做的一份工作就应该对于家永远感恩不尽啊？(What I heard is: My grandmother was discovered and sent to the hospital by this private assistant Yu when my grandmother got food related discomforts. I heard Yu's families think my grandmother's family should appreciate this permanently forever, but my grandmother did not survive the discomforts but died in the hospital. It was not like my grandmother survived because this private assistant found her on time, the truth was my grandmother never left the hospital but died there. Why my grandmother's family should appreciate private assistant Yu so greatly and so forever because he was the one found her and did his paid-job to send her to the hospital during his paid working-time?)
我听说的是：我曾祖父的故事也是这个情况，因食物造成不适，由当时拿着保镖工资的于姓保镖发现而送医或者是叫了医生，隔夜就去世了。凭什么说我们就欠了于家的？(What I heard is: My great-grandfather was a similar story that he got food related discomforts, and he was discovered by the security Yu, and either sent to the hospital or called in a doctor by security Yu during security Yu's paid shift. My great-grandfather died overnight or so. Why my family owes this Yu's family because of this?)
我听说的是：我爷爷在1948年在香港办理信托后，就把上海大部分的财产放在了我奶奶的名字下面，我奶奶一住院，我爷爷就赶紧把钱转回他自己名下结果我奶奶还是去世了。(What I heard is: After my grandfather set up the Hong Kong Trust, my grandfather transferred the majority of his wealth to my grandmother's name. When my grandmother was hospitalized, my grandfather hurried to transfer the wealth back to his own name but seems did not save my grandmother.)
我就是不明白啊。就像昨天在广播剧里，于家就是一副已经很不耐烦的口气，好像是我在无理取闹才硬要说钱是我的，是美国公司在蛮不讲理才坚持不给他们于家想要的美国钱，可他们于家和美国公司一点关联都没有的，于家从来就不是什么投资人也不是什么生意往来户，于家就是个什么都不是。怎么就这么凶啊？(I just don't understand any of this. Just like yesterday's broadcasting, Yu's families sound like they are so fed up with all these already. as if I am being so annoying to insist on stating that is my money, the American company has been so ridiculous insist on not to continue providing them the money, but Yu's families got nothing to do with the American company, not investing associated nor business associated, basically is not associated at all. Why this tone?)
我爷爷在香港所设立信托的委托书里所指定的唯一受益人是我父亲的胎记掌纹支所生的胎记掌纹女，我是1967年出生有着和我父亲一摸一样的双掌胎记掌纹的他的掌纹女，是我父亲所生所育的他的骨肉女，是我父亲靠他自己的工资收入辛苦养大的他的亲生女，我方敏是我父亲唯一的女儿，我爷爷的掌纹儿子所生所育的唯一掌纹女。(My grandfather's settler's letter of the Hong Kong Trust entity stated that the sole beneficiary person should be the female-palm from his eldest son Fang, Wenhai‘s (方文海） palm-line. I was born in 1967 with birthmarks on my both palms exactly the same after my father, I am my father's own blood, I am my father's own girl he had raised by his hard-earned own making, I am my father's only biological daughter, my grandfather's birthmark son's only female birthmark-palms.)
06-06-2018 Rumors I heard about my family
----2018年6月30日。
Saturday, June 30, 2018
Friday, June 29, 2018
06-29-2018 My inherited is part of my wallet that is never subject to spy (我的钱包包括我所继承的，从来都是不容盯梢）
06-29-2018 My inherited is part of my wallet that is never subject to spy (我的钱包包括我所继承的，从来都是不容盯梢）
Heard this morning's talk about one Rockefeller family's money confusion.（听说了今天早上谈到有关一个洛克菲勒家庭的钱困扰）
My response: I have no idea how come it became confusion after I left the meeting of July 1st, 2004. （我的回应：我就是不明白怎么2004年7月1日会议后这花钱的事怎么就变成了R家困扰。）
I only authorized David Petraeus' wife Holly on July 1st of 2004 to keep an eye on if her husband would pay for my glass house cancer treatment because the decision was I would pay it myself and she was employed by the medical treatment provider system in 2004. The fact that I could self-pay for my medical expense which was "well-known very expensive in 2004" should mean she would have no need to keep an eye on my daily living expenses and I was either a homeless or living on welfare before my medical expenses were paid since October(or November) of 2014. She was never authorized to spy on my wallet and she is no longer authorized to keep an eye on my medical spending on glasshouse cancer treatment as David Petraeus announced.（我在2004年7月1日那天只授权了David Petraeus的老婆Holly看着我的脑控癌治疗费用账户以确定是不是她自己的丈夫在替我付钱，这是因为在这授权之前就已经决定了这治疗费用会由我自己支付而她本人2004年当时又在提供治疗的医疗系统上班。只要我有能力自己支付在2004年当时公认很昂贵的脑控癌治疗费用是事实，就意味着她就应该没有任何需要盯着我的生活费用给付，而且在2014年10月或者11月我的脑控癌治疗开始付费前，我要么是没钱的流浪汉要么靠美国政府的救济综援生活。她从来未被我授权盯着我的钱包，她现在也没有我的授权也不再可以盯着我的医疗给付了，就如今天早上David Petraeus所说明的一样。）
A Chinese female's self-claim to voluntary spying on my wallet on July 1st of 2004 was understood by me as prostituting effort which I never had (and never will have) a penis to be responsive. My irresponsiveness never meant authorization but meant I am a female who doesn't have a penis to respond. I have and I will continuingly report any effort on spying my wallet to the law enforcement. My Trust entities I lawfully inherited are part of my wallet that is not subject for anyone to spy. （还有一个华人女子在2004年7月日当天声称自愿盯着我的钱包，我的理解是这个女人是在卖淫而我根本就没有男睾具可以回应。我当时的没有任何回应从来不是默许授权而是因为我是个女人根本就没有男睾具可以竖起来回应回应。我已经就我的钱包被莫名其妙的盯梢而报警处理，我今后就此报警也永远不会犹豫。我所合法继承的这些信托从来都是我私人钱包的一部分也从来不容盯梢。）
The rumors that the Senior couples would pay for my financial demands are ridiculous. David Petraeus' family has no reason to pay for any of my financial demands. I have requested tons such demands to my own entrusting attorneys & accountants, but never to the Senior couples of the Petraeus' family. （有关长者夫妻应该会为我的财务要求付费的传言真是莫名其妙。David Petraeus的家里没有任何理由为我的任何财务要求付费。我确实是提出了一堆的财务要求，但都是向我自己的信托律师及会计师提出，从来不是向David Petraeus家里的长者夫妻提出。）
----June 29th, 2018
听说了于家强烈表达他们没有责任义务向我谈他们当年如何使用所扣押款项。（Heard Yu's families expressed their annoyedness strongly that they are not responsible to explain anything to me.)
我的回应：(My response:)
于家有责任义务向美国或者中国执法相关机构谈他们当年为何非法扣押我的生活费用给付及如何使用该款项， 我作为于家当年非法扣押生活费款项事件的受害人会实事求是的向美国执法机关说明 1：特殊年代， 2：时间久远。(Yu's families are responsible to explain to the law enforcement from the United States' or the People's Republic of China on why they illegally detained my living expenses providing and how they spent the detained money. Being the victim of their illegal detention of my living expense providing, I will truthfully explain to the law enforcement of the United States that 1: 1967 was the year of Chinese Red Guards culture revolution time, 2: It has been a long time and my growing up has been smooth.)
我需要强调于家扣押我的生活费用海外汇款从来不是于家的什么合法权利，也从来不是因为我爷爷方智仁或者我的曾祖父母（方智仁的父亲母亲）欠了他们于家什么。(I need to emphasize the detention of my living expenses providing has never been Yu's families' lawful rights nor their privileges, and it was never because of any debts owed by my grandfather Fang, Zhiren nor my from my great-grandparents (Fang, Zhiren's parents.)
我所听说的是：于姓私人助理的丈母娘和我爷爷方智仁从未有过任何恋爱关系，于姓私人助理的妻子也从来不是我爷爷的血脉骨肉。于姓私人助理是在我父亲方文海1949年当兵之后才成为我爷爷的私人助理的。 1961年时我爷爷支付于姓私人助理每月的工资是￥196.00元人民币。(What I have heard are: Private assistant' Yu's mother-in-law never had any romance with my grandfather Fang, Zhiren, private assistant Yu's wife was never my grandfather's own blood. Mr. Yu became my grandfather's private assistant was after my father joined the Chinese Army in 1949. The wage my grandfather paid to this private assistant Mr. Yu in 1961 was￥196.00 per month which was $196.00 because the exchange rate was $1 U.S.dollar = ￥1 RMB in 1961.)
我个人认为于家今天的表态是因为我昨天的博文强调了于家和该汇款美国公司没有任何关联后，这表态其实是于家想和该美国公司搭上关系的努力。当年的每笔汇款，从1967年7月第一笔汇款开始，都是通过香港中介银行转送往上海，直到1996年我离开中国后停止汇款，于家从不清楚汇款美国公司的任何情况,于家就只知道在1996年10月以后就再没收到过汇款。(My personal opinion, Yu's families expression today was because my blog article stated that they never had any association with the American company who wired the money, this expression was out of the efforts that intended to create a communication channel with the American company to have some association. All these wires had been through a Hong Kong media bank to redirect to Shanghai since the first wire in July of 1967 till the wire stopped immediately after I left China in October of 1996. Yu's families never knew anything about the wiring American company this entire time, Yu's families just knew there had been no wire after October of 1996.)
----2018年6月29日。
Heard this morning's talk about one Rockefeller family's money confusion.（听说了今天早上谈到有关一个洛克菲勒家庭的钱困扰）
My response: I have no idea how come it became confusion after I left the meeting of July 1st, 2004. （我的回应：我就是不明白怎么2004年7月1日会议后这花钱的事怎么就变成了R家困扰。）
I only authorized David Petraeus' wife Holly on July 1st of 2004 to keep an eye on if her husband would pay for my glass house cancer treatment because the decision was I would pay it myself and she was employed by the medical treatment provider system in 2004. The fact that I could self-pay for my medical expense which was "well-known very expensive in 2004" should mean she would have no need to keep an eye on my daily living expenses and I was either a homeless or living on welfare before my medical expenses were paid since October(or November) of 2014. She was never authorized to spy on my wallet and she is no longer authorized to keep an eye on my medical spending on glasshouse cancer treatment as David Petraeus announced.（我在2004年7月1日那天只授权了David Petraeus的老婆Holly看着我的脑控癌治疗费用账户以确定是不是她自己的丈夫在替我付钱，这是因为在这授权之前就已经决定了这治疗费用会由我自己支付而她本人2004年当时又在提供治疗的医疗系统上班。只要我有能力自己支付在2004年当时公认很昂贵的脑控癌治疗费用是事实，就意味着她就应该没有任何需要盯着我的生活费用给付，而且在2014年10月或者11月我的脑控癌治疗开始付费前，我要么是没钱的流浪汉要么靠美国政府的救济综援生活。她从来未被我授权盯着我的钱包，她现在也没有我的授权也不再可以盯着我的医疗给付了，就如今天早上David Petraeus所说明的一样。）
A Chinese female's self-claim to voluntary spying on my wallet on July 1st of 2004 was understood by me as prostituting effort which I never had (and never will have) a penis to be responsive. My irresponsiveness never meant authorization but meant I am a female who doesn't have a penis to respond. I have and I will continuingly report any effort on spying my wallet to the law enforcement. My Trust entities I lawfully inherited are part of my wallet that is not subject for anyone to spy. （还有一个华人女子在2004年7月日当天声称自愿盯着我的钱包，我的理解是这个女人是在卖淫而我根本就没有男睾具可以回应。我当时的没有任何回应从来不是默许授权而是因为我是个女人根本就没有男睾具可以竖起来回应回应。我已经就我的钱包被莫名其妙的盯梢而报警处理，我今后就此报警也永远不会犹豫。我所合法继承的这些信托从来都是我私人钱包的一部分也从来不容盯梢。）
The rumors that the Senior couples would pay for my financial demands are ridiculous. David Petraeus' family has no reason to pay for any of my financial demands. I have requested tons such demands to my own entrusting attorneys & accountants, but never to the Senior couples of the Petraeus' family. （有关长者夫妻应该会为我的财务要求付费的传言真是莫名其妙。David Petraeus的家里没有任何理由为我的任何财务要求付费。我确实是提出了一堆的财务要求，但都是向我自己的信托律师及会计师提出，从来不是向David Petraeus家里的长者夫妻提出。）
----June 29th, 2018
听说了于家强烈表达他们没有责任义务向我谈他们当年如何使用所扣押款项。（Heard Yu's families expressed their annoyedness strongly that they are not responsible to explain anything to me.)
我的回应：(My response:)
于家有责任义务向美国或者中国执法相关机构谈他们当年为何非法扣押我的生活费用给付及如何使用该款项， 我作为于家当年非法扣押生活费款项事件的受害人会实事求是的向美国执法机关说明 1：特殊年代， 2：时间久远。(Yu's families are responsible to explain to the law enforcement from the United States' or the People's Republic of China on why they illegally detained my living expenses providing and how they spent the detained money. Being the victim of their illegal detention of my living expense providing, I will truthfully explain to the law enforcement of the United States that 1: 1967 was the year of Chinese Red Guards culture revolution time, 2: It has been a long time and my growing up has been smooth.)
我需要强调于家扣押我的生活费用海外汇款从来不是于家的什么合法权利，也从来不是因为我爷爷方智仁或者我的曾祖父母（方智仁的父亲母亲）欠了他们于家什么。(I need to emphasize the detention of my living expenses providing has never been Yu's families' lawful rights nor their privileges, and it was never because of any debts owed by my grandfather Fang, Zhiren nor my from my great-grandparents (Fang, Zhiren's parents.)
我所听说的是：于姓私人助理的丈母娘和我爷爷方智仁从未有过任何恋爱关系，于姓私人助理的妻子也从来不是我爷爷的血脉骨肉。于姓私人助理是在我父亲方文海1949年当兵之后才成为我爷爷的私人助理的。 1961年时我爷爷支付于姓私人助理每月的工资是￥196.00元人民币。(What I have heard are: Private assistant' Yu's mother-in-law never had any romance with my grandfather Fang, Zhiren, private assistant Yu's wife was never my grandfather's own blood. Mr. Yu became my grandfather's private assistant was after my father joined the Chinese Army in 1949. The wage my grandfather paid to this private assistant Mr. Yu in 1961 was￥196.00 per month which was $196.00 because the exchange rate was $1 U.S.dollar = ￥1 RMB in 1961.)
我个人认为于家今天的表态是因为我昨天的博文强调了于家和该汇款美国公司没有任何关联后，这表态其实是于家想和该美国公司搭上关系的努力。当年的每笔汇款，从1967年7月第一笔汇款开始，都是通过香港中介银行转送往上海，直到1996年我离开中国后停止汇款，于家从不清楚汇款美国公司的任何情况,于家就只知道在1996年10月以后就再没收到过汇款。(My personal opinion, Yu's families expression today was because my blog article stated that they never had any association with the American company who wired the money, this expression was out of the efforts that intended to create a communication channel with the American company to have some association. All these wires had been through a Hong Kong media bank to redirect to Shanghai since the first wire in July of 1967 till the wire stopped immediately after I left China in October of 1996. Yu's families never knew anything about the wiring American company this entire time, Yu's families just knew there had been no wire after October of 1996.)
----2018年6月29日。
Thursday, June 28, 2018
06-28-2018 Those no-money Fang's offspring should accuse their own grandfathers instead of swearing about me(那些没钱的方家后人应该去指责他们自己的爷爷而不是对我谩骂)
06-28-2018 Those no-money Fang's offspring should accuse their own grandfathers instead of swearing about me (那些没钱的方家后人应该去指责他们自己的爷爷而不是对我谩骂)
听说了今天早上方家后人对我的中文谩骂。(Heard this morning's swearing from Fang's offspring)
听说了今天早上方家后人对我的中文谩骂。(Heard this morning's swearing from Fang's offspring)
我的回应：哪里来的这份愤怒？又不是他们家的爷爷当年没有分到家产。他们家爷爷把钱都给花光了，赌钱赌光了，玩女人玩光了，关我什么事？我所继承的是信托也就是格外给我的一份礼物而已，又没拿了一分一毫他们所分到的家产，把气撒我这里干嘛？(My response: Where this anger come from? It was never their own grandfathers did not get any share of the family inheritance. Their own grandfathers might have spent it all on women, or on gambling, etc. what this got to do with me at all? Trust entities I inherited are the gifts given to me, not a penny from their grandfathers' any share of inherited, why I am the one being blamed?)
从唐太宗李世民以第四子继承了他父亲唐高祖李渊的皇位开始，就已经是举世皆知我们家从来不是长子继承而是家族胎记掌纹继承。我的爷爷我的父亲和我这一支是我们家里的继承人一支，这是我爷爷方智仁把他大部分的钱都办了信托给我父亲的掌纹支所出的掌纹女儿（也就是我）的最主要原因。虽然我是我这一代的继承人，但方智仁爷爷1948年给我的信托，就象其他爷爷给我的一样，也还是给我的礼物。我爷爷方智仁1965年去世前给他所有子女的遗嘱是我爷爷方智仁所做的去世前的财务安排也就是分家产。直到去世，方智仁爷爷都从未更改他于1948年所立的信托委托书，方智仁爷爷1965年给他所有子女的所有遗嘱里也都没有更改信托意愿。(Since the Second Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong（唐太宗李世民）, the fourth son of his Emperor father, became the crown prince because of his palm-birthmarks, it has been historically well-known my family's inheriting rule is never the first-born son inheriting but the family birthmark inheriting. My grandfather, my father and I are the family's palm-birthmark heir line, this was the major reason my grandfather used most of his wealth to set up the Hong Kong Trust entity for me who is my father's palm-birthmark line's palm-birthmark daughter. Even though I am my generation heir of the family, but my Trust entity my grandfather set up for me in 1948 was still a gift to me from my grandfather, the same as my other upstream grandfathers' gifts to me. Before my grandfather Fang, Zhiren (方智仁) passed away in 1965, he had written his last will to each of his four children about his financial arrangement for each of his child which was the family inheriting of my grandfather's generation. Till his death, my grandfather never changed his settler's letter of the Hong Kong Trust entity he had set up, and he never mentioned this Hong Kong Trust entity in all his 1965 letters to all his children. )
我相信每一代爷爷去世前，都有给各房子女做好财务安排。我们家是一夫多妻家庭都已经有一两千年了，也一直都有母凭子贵母后娘娘皇太后的传统，家里确实都是一直只有一房二房称谓，从无大房偏房之称。我相信爷爷们在分家产时可能会有对这房那房孩子的一些特别偏爱，有继承人与非继承人的区别，但从来就没有什么所谓大房偏房的区别。(I tend to believe that when each generation of my grandfathers was about to leave this world, each of them had made financial arrangement for each of his children and each of his wife. My family has been polygamist marriage family for over 1000 years already, and the entire time my family has this tradition of privileges for the mother of the heir as the Mother of the King or Queen Mother, so my family always had the first wife, second wife but never a concubine wife. I would believe my grandfathers might have some favored this or that child from this or that wife, some difference between the heir-son and the non-heir sons when it comes to how to decide the shares of his wealth inheriting among his own children, but not out of if the mother was the first one married to him).
每一代做父亲的去世前，也都是给每一个孩子以及他所有孩子们的母亲做好安排，也从来都是各房拿各房自己的钱，年纪小的也都有办理一份信托等成年后再兑现，没听说有哪家没分到家产的。估计家里一直也都有所谓的如何分家产的祖规，大差不差的，所以每一代分家产的时候各房也都算是安静，从来就没听说家里有那一代有为了分家产而有哪一房闹得上吊跳崖的故事，怎么现在跑我这儿撒气来了？(At the time when each generation of my grandfathers about to leave this world, the financial arrangements always had been for all his wives and each of his children, it always had been each cluster of the children took their own shares with their mother's own share, young aged would have a Trust set up for him to cash when reaching the adult age, there never had any family stories about who did not get a penny. I assume my family may even have some inheriting-share-arrangement rules to apply since ancient time which must have been proven to be fair enough for each generation's inheriting. For the past over 1000 years' time, the family inheriting had been smooth without any family stories featuring which desperate wife did what dramatics with her entire or partial clan after "any unfair inheriting". Why all of sudden there is such angry against me from at least 4th-cousin away?)
我拿到的是礼物，就拿今天广播里所讲的这个信托来说吧，今天早上所提到的据说和美国“Pejoves”基金公司是同一个爷爷（南唐中主李璟）所设信托的投资， 南唐中主李璟爷爷在公元916年左右送给了我这份礼物，可我自己的父亲我自己的爷爷都统统没份分享，我所拿到的这份礼物哪里会和其他各代各房的子女有任何关系啊？我所继承的的信托都是我100%独自完全拥有的礼物。(What I inherited are gifts to me, such as the Trust entity featured in this morning's broadcasting which is the investor of this morning's mentioned company as well as the American "Pejoves" Fund company. this Trust entity was set up for me by the Southern Tang dynasty Emperor Lee, King ( or Li, Jing 李璟) in the year 916AD that even my father Fang, Wenhai (方文海）and my grandfather Fang, Zhiren (方智仁) don't have any share in it, how could this gift possibly have anything to do with any offspring from any generations' grandfather's other wives ? The Trust entities I have inherited are all 100% solely owned by myself.)
----2018年6月28日。
有说一些方家后人想打官司争取信托但没有遗嘱可以作为法律依据上法庭。(Heard there are some Fang's offspring intend to file lawsuits but no such Will can be the legal ground for them to do so.)
我的回应：确实如此。((My response: This is a true statement. )
因为这些信托从来都只是作为礼物为家里的胎记掌纹继承支的胎记掌纹继承女（也就是我）所设立，设立信托时的委托书从来都是给我这个唯一的受益人的，从来不是给任何其他方家后人的，连我自己的父亲爷爷也没有。我是这些信托的唯一受益人是由设立信托的爷爷们在信托委托书里所指定的也从未更改的，方家其他后人不可能有相关遗嘱。(It is because all these Trust entities are set up as gifts only to me who is the family palm-birthmark heir-daughter from the family palm-birthmark heirs' line as the specified the sole beneficiary person in each of these Trust entities' settlers' letters, each of these Trust entities was never intended to be a gift to anyone else even my own father and my grandfather. I have been the sole beneficiary person of each of these Trust entities by each's settler's letter which has never been changed ever since the set up of each of these Trust entities. None of those Fang's offspring could have such a Will.)
我没有拿方家其他后人的任何钱，我不会因为自己有收到爷爷给我的这些礼物就觉得亏欠了
方家的其他后人。每一代分家产时，方家血脉都有分到很体面的份额。(I did not take any money from other people's inheritable, and I won't feel as I owe anyone only because I got these gifts from my own birth grandfathers. All Fang's offspring of each generation had their own decent shares at their inheriting time.)
举个例子，国民政府时期的国民教育部当年筹资中央大学系统时的三代最大的捐款人的第一代，也就是我曽曾祖父这一代，我听说血缘传承的每一非继承子所分家产平均是10万大洋左右，也就是在1905-1920年期间，我曽曾祖父的每一非继承子是分到了30万的美金（如果汇率是1大洋=3美金）。这一份家产规模在当年就是足够在上海开一家银行的资本。我得强调血缘传承的非继承子，否则来一堆没父子血缘关系甚至没有任何血缘关系的扯着嗓门的叫唤没拿到钱。(For example, the first generation of the three generations biggest donors to the Education Department of the Republic of China for establishing Chinese colleges, my great-great-grandfather's generation, I heard each biological non-heir son's share averaged 100, 000 Silver Dollar which means the average size for each biological non-heir son of my great-great-grandfather was $300,000 U.S. Dollars if the exchange rate was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 U.S Dollar in the 1905-1920 time. This was the size that could open a bank in Shanghai at that time. I have the great need to emphasize this "biological non-heir son" to avoid myself from being yelled at "never" by those who are either not from this great-great-grandfather of mine or not even biologically associated.)
再比如我听说1965年我爷爷方智仁去世时给我父亲弟妹的每人一万元人民币，就是上海一个街道储蓄所的全部现金储备，也就是1965年的这一万元钱可以在上海开一家街道储蓄所了，如果当时一元大洋还是三元美金的汇率，这钱在美国可能也可以开一间类似街道储蓄所啦，方智仁爷爷给的也不差啊。（Another example, I heard the amount of ￥10,000 RMB that my grandfather Fang, Zhiren gave to each of my father's sibling in 1965, was the total amount of the cash reserve needed for a local bank's branch in Shanghai which means the ￥10,000 RBM my grandfather gave to each of my father's siblings was a good size to open a bank's branch in Shanghai in 1965, possibly in the United States as well if the exchange rate was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 U.S. dollar. )
每代都是如此，至于钱怎么处理，就是分到家产的子女自己决定的啦。现在没钱啦，就对我连吼代叫想从我收到的礼物里狠狠咬上一口，凭什么呀？我是坚决拒绝睬都不睬。再加上我父亲母亲在2004年后的经历，除了我自己父母，我是谁都不欠。(Each generation has been like this, how the young generation would spend this inherited money, of course, would be the young generation's own decision. So, now their offspring just swearing at me because they run out of their inherited money and expect to bit into my gifts? I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse. I don't owe anyone else other than my own parents after my parents' experiences since my inheriting of the gifts in 2004.)
我是真的不会理睬现在这些对我个人拿到礼物的谩骂而不指责他们自己爷爷的做法，这种做法真是莫名其妙的紧，岂有此理的很。(I truly won't listen to these swearing at me while their own grandfathers should be their accusation. This has been ridiculous enough and absurd enough.)
----2018年6月28日。
我相信每一代爷爷去世前，都有给各房子女做好财务安排。我们家是一夫多妻家庭都已经有一两千年了，也一直都有母凭子贵母后娘娘皇太后的传统，家里确实都是一直只有一房二房称谓，从无大房偏房之称。我相信爷爷们在分家产时可能会有对这房那房孩子的一些特别偏爱，有继承人与非继承人的区别，但从来就没有什么所谓大房偏房的区别。(I tend to believe that when each generation of my grandfathers was about to leave this world, each of them had made financial arrangement for each of his children and each of his wife. My family has been polygamist marriage family for over 1000 years already, and the entire time my family has this tradition of privileges for the mother of the heir as the Mother of the King or Queen Mother, so my family always had the first wife, second wife but never a concubine wife. I would believe my grandfathers might have some favored this or that child from this or that wife, some difference between the heir-son and the non-heir sons when it comes to how to decide the shares of his wealth inheriting among his own children, but not out of if the mother was the first one married to him).
每一代做父亲的去世前，也都是给每一个孩子以及他所有孩子们的母亲做好安排，也从来都是各房拿各房自己的钱，年纪小的也都有办理一份信托等成年后再兑现，没听说有哪家没分到家产的。估计家里一直也都有所谓的如何分家产的祖规，大差不差的，所以每一代分家产的时候各房也都算是安静，从来就没听说家里有那一代有为了分家产而有哪一房闹得上吊跳崖的故事，怎么现在跑我这儿撒气来了？(At the time when each generation of my grandfathers about to leave this world, the financial arrangements always had been for all his wives and each of his children, it always had been each cluster of the children took their own shares with their mother's own share, young aged would have a Trust set up for him to cash when reaching the adult age, there never had any family stories about who did not get a penny. I assume my family may even have some inheriting-share-arrangement rules to apply since ancient time which must have been proven to be fair enough for each generation's inheriting. For the past over 1000 years' time, the family inheriting had been smooth without any family stories featuring which desperate wife did what dramatics with her entire or partial clan after "any unfair inheriting". Why all of sudden there is such angry against me from at least 4th-cousin away?)
我拿到的是礼物，就拿今天广播里所讲的这个信托来说吧，今天早上所提到的据说和美国“Pejoves”基金公司是同一个爷爷（南唐中主李璟）所设信托的投资， 南唐中主李璟爷爷在公元916年左右送给了我这份礼物，可我自己的父亲我自己的爷爷都统统没份分享，我所拿到的这份礼物哪里会和其他各代各房的子女有任何关系啊？我所继承的的信托都是我100%独自完全拥有的礼物。(What I inherited are gifts to me, such as the Trust entity featured in this morning's broadcasting which is the investor of this morning's mentioned company as well as the American "Pejoves" Fund company. this Trust entity was set up for me by the Southern Tang dynasty Emperor Lee, King ( or Li, Jing 李璟) in the year 916AD that even my father Fang, Wenhai (方文海）and my grandfather Fang, Zhiren (方智仁) don't have any share in it, how could this gift possibly have anything to do with any offspring from any generations' grandfather's other wives ? The Trust entities I have inherited are all 100% solely owned by myself.)
----2018年6月28日。
有说一些方家后人想打官司争取信托但没有遗嘱可以作为法律依据上法庭。(Heard there are some Fang's offspring intend to file lawsuits but no such Will can be the legal ground for them to do so.)
我的回应：确实如此。((My response: This is a true statement. )
因为这些信托从来都只是作为礼物为家里的胎记掌纹继承支的胎记掌纹继承女（也就是我）所设立，设立信托时的委托书从来都是给我这个唯一的受益人的，从来不是给任何其他方家后人的，连我自己的父亲爷爷也没有。我是这些信托的唯一受益人是由设立信托的爷爷们在信托委托书里所指定的也从未更改的，方家其他后人不可能有相关遗嘱。(It is because all these Trust entities are set up as gifts only to me who is the family palm-birthmark heir-daughter from the family palm-birthmark heirs' line as the specified the sole beneficiary person in each of these Trust entities' settlers' letters, each of these Trust entities was never intended to be a gift to anyone else even my own father and my grandfather. I have been the sole beneficiary person of each of these Trust entities by each's settler's letter which has never been changed ever since the set up of each of these Trust entities. None of those Fang's offspring could have such a Will.)
我没有拿方家其他后人的任何钱，我不会因为自己有收到爷爷给我的这些礼物就觉得亏欠了
方家的其他后人。每一代分家产时，方家血脉都有分到很体面的份额。(I did not take any money from other people's inheritable, and I won't feel as I owe anyone only because I got these gifts from my own birth grandfathers. All Fang's offspring of each generation had their own decent shares at their inheriting time.)
举个例子，国民政府时期的国民教育部当年筹资中央大学系统时的三代最大的捐款人的第一代，也就是我曽曾祖父这一代，我听说血缘传承的每一非继承子所分家产平均是10万大洋左右，也就是在1905-1920年期间，我曽曾祖父的每一非继承子是分到了30万的美金（如果汇率是1大洋=3美金）。这一份家产规模在当年就是足够在上海开一家银行的资本。我得强调血缘传承的非继承子，否则来一堆没父子血缘关系甚至没有任何血缘关系的扯着嗓门的叫唤没拿到钱。(For example, the first generation of the three generations biggest donors to the Education Department of the Republic of China for establishing Chinese colleges, my great-great-grandfather's generation, I heard each biological non-heir son's share averaged 100, 000 Silver Dollar which means the average size for each biological non-heir son of my great-great-grandfather was $300,000 U.S. Dollars if the exchange rate was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 U.S Dollar in the 1905-1920 time. This was the size that could open a bank in Shanghai at that time. I have the great need to emphasize this "biological non-heir son" to avoid myself from being yelled at "never" by those who are either not from this great-great-grandfather of mine or not even biologically associated.)
再比如我听说1965年我爷爷方智仁去世时给我父亲弟妹的每人一万元人民币，就是上海一个街道储蓄所的全部现金储备，也就是1965年的这一万元钱可以在上海开一家街道储蓄所了，如果当时一元大洋还是三元美金的汇率，这钱在美国可能也可以开一间类似街道储蓄所啦，方智仁爷爷给的也不差啊。（Another example, I heard the amount of ￥10,000 RMB that my grandfather Fang, Zhiren gave to each of my father's sibling in 1965, was the total amount of the cash reserve needed for a local bank's branch in Shanghai which means the ￥10,000 RBM my grandfather gave to each of my father's siblings was a good size to open a bank's branch in Shanghai in 1965, possibly in the United States as well if the exchange rate was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 U.S. dollar. )
每代都是如此，至于钱怎么处理，就是分到家产的子女自己决定的啦。现在没钱啦，就对我连吼代叫想从我收到的礼物里狠狠咬上一口，凭什么呀？我是坚决拒绝睬都不睬。再加上我父亲母亲在2004年后的经历，除了我自己父母，我是谁都不欠。(Each generation has been like this, how the young generation would spend this inherited money, of course, would be the young generation's own decision. So, now their offspring just swearing at me because they run out of their inherited money and expect to bit into my gifts? I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse, I refuse. I don't owe anyone else other than my own parents after my parents' experiences since my inheriting of the gifts in 2004.)
我是真的不会理睬现在这些对我个人拿到礼物的谩骂而不指责他们自己爷爷的做法，这种做法真是莫名其妙的紧，岂有此理的很。(I truly won't listen to these swearing at me while their own grandfathers should be their accusation. This has been ridiculous enough and absurd enough.)
----2018年6月28日。
Wednesday, June 27, 2018
06-27-2018 Laws are at work already, Just listen to the radio program (法律已经在工作，你就听广播剧吧）
06-27-2018 Laws are at work already, Just listen to the radio program (法律已经在工作，你就听广播剧吧）
Laws are at work already to ensure the freedom of speech does not mean confusing
(法律已经在工作：言论自由创作自由都不容混淆法律上的是非真相）
Heard this morning's talk of the confusion about tax laws. (听说了几天早上提到有关税法的困扰)
My response: I heard which certainly means may not be accurate, that according to the United States tax laws, the investor tax is paid when the money is transferring out of the investment for personal usage. So, it is lawful for a U.S. citizen investor not to reveal the total size or detailed size of any combination of investments as an investor. But by law, an investor needs to report the actual amount of the money being transferred out of the investment purpose at the same time of the transferring. (我的回应：我听说也就是说不一定准确啊，按照美国法律，投资人税是在投资款项被转出投资目的用于非投资目的时支付。所以，投资人是美国公民的话，是可以合法不公开投资综合及项目细节。但是按照法律，一个投资人必须在款项转出投资目的时如实汇报转出投资用途的款项数额。）
If so, what will happen if there is any unlawful investment activity? The law enforcement enforcing laws by tracking down who is the investor of the discovered unlawful activity. (那如果有非法投资活动哪？一旦发现非法活动，警方执法是倒追谁是该非法活动的投资人。）
My Trust entity has been registered as an entity for investment and I am a U.S. citizen, so it is lawful to refuse to reveal any investment activities of my Trust entity. （我的信托是注册为投资目的法人机构, 我又是美国公民，所以拒绝公开我的信托的投资活动是合法权利。）
I heard this morning's anger was because the insist-on request for a Spanish company's accounting information was from an American who is never associated to the Spanish company in any way.（我听说今天早上的愤怒是因为坚持要求西班牙的一家公司的提交该公司业务账目信息的这个美国人和西班牙的这家公司是一点关联都没有。）
----June 27th, 2018
Heard about this morning's confusion from the Mr. "Amusing Incident".（听说了今天早上还在困扰中的“乌龙事件”主角）
My response: It sounds like the Mister is still confused. It is not a surprise if you heard how confused some Miss Os and some Mister Os are, I heard they are still really confused.
（我的回应：听起来这先生还困扰着那。不过你要是听说了有几个O家先生O家小姐还在怎么样的多么的困扰着，你就一点都不觉得奇怪了。）
I heard the family confusion of Mr. "Amusing Incident" was clarified according to laws in the radio program for a four-days-time between June 7th of 2018 -June 10th of 2018, and June 11th-14th of 2018 broadcasting was the "freedom of speech" of what else has been confusing to them after the 4-days major clarification according to the laws. What you heard today is the impact of what else has been so confusing. It won't be surprising if there is something else still very confusing. Just listen to the radio program.
（我听说“乌龙”先生家的困扰在法律上的澄清是广播剧2018年6月7日-10日的四天的播出内容，2018年6月11日-14日是“乌龙先生”家里还在为什么而困扰的"言论自由的表达”，你今天听到的就是在那四天依据法律进行的大体上的事件澄清之后，这个"乌龙“先生还在困扰什么所造成的后果/。这当然是一点都不奇怪啊，听众就继续听广播剧的”下回分解”吧。）
I believe laws are already at work on the radio program's producing. Being the majorly impacted major-featured-person of this radio program, I did keep on calling law enforcement's help as well to make sure the radio program is reporting these types of important matters, not scripting nor patching-up and nor over-writing after the lawful clarification.
（我相信法律已经在进行广播剧制作相关的执法工作。作为受广播剧影响最大的广播剧主要人物，我也一直在报警求助警方保障广播剧是在就这些重要内容进行报道而非编纂编辑内容，或者试图事后改写依据法律所做的真相澄清。）
Freedom of speech, granted by the United States' Constitution, is the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint. Freedom of speech is the right to verbally express, never the right to verbally take over any format of any physically existing entity nor any financial valuables.（美国人的言论自由是由美国宪法赋予美国公民的权利。言论自由的权利是可以不受压制不受限制的用语言来表达的权力， 从来不是用语言来夺取合法被其他人所拥有的任何物质存在及任何财产财务的权利。）
06-07-2018 Amusing incident （乌龙事件）
----June 27th, 2018
听说了于家就是没法明白。（Heard Yu's families are so confused)
我的回应：我现在还在听究竟于家是个什么故事。(My response: I am still listening exactly what has been the story.)
于家认为他们当年可以把钱留下，该美国公司既没有追究也没停止付款，就已经表明了于家就是应该继续拿钱。Yu's families think the American "Pejoves" Fund company did not stop wiring the money the entire time fully aware of Yu's families had kept all the wired money to themselves should mean granting Yu's families to own the money.
该美国公司其实对此已经说的很清楚. (The American company already clarified this clearly:)
我个人认为公司在1967年7月至1996年10月期间，在明知我方敏及我父母从未收到该项汇款的情况下，从未停止支付该项汇款的原因：（My personal opinion regarding the reasons that the American company did not stop the wiring after aware of my family never received any money:)
----2018年6月27日。
Laws are at work already to ensure the freedom of speech does not mean confusing
(法律已经在工作：言论自由创作自由都不容混淆法律上的是非真相）
Heard this morning's talk of the confusion about tax laws. (听说了几天早上提到有关税法的困扰)
My response: I heard which certainly means may not be accurate, that according to the United States tax laws, the investor tax is paid when the money is transferring out of the investment for personal usage. So, it is lawful for a U.S. citizen investor not to reveal the total size or detailed size of any combination of investments as an investor. But by law, an investor needs to report the actual amount of the money being transferred out of the investment purpose at the same time of the transferring. (我的回应：我听说也就是说不一定准确啊，按照美国法律，投资人税是在投资款项被转出投资目的用于非投资目的时支付。所以，投资人是美国公民的话，是可以合法不公开投资综合及项目细节。但是按照法律，一个投资人必须在款项转出投资目的时如实汇报转出投资用途的款项数额。）
If so, what will happen if there is any unlawful investment activity? The law enforcement enforcing laws by tracking down who is the investor of the discovered unlawful activity. (那如果有非法投资活动哪？一旦发现非法活动，警方执法是倒追谁是该非法活动的投资人。）
My Trust entity has been registered as an entity for investment and I am a U.S. citizen, so it is lawful to refuse to reveal any investment activities of my Trust entity. （我的信托是注册为投资目的法人机构, 我又是美国公民，所以拒绝公开我的信托的投资活动是合法权利。）
I heard this morning's anger was because the insist-on request for a Spanish company's accounting information was from an American who is never associated to the Spanish company in any way.（我听说今天早上的愤怒是因为坚持要求西班牙的一家公司的提交该公司业务账目信息的这个美国人和西班牙的这家公司是一点关联都没有。）
----June 27th, 2018
Heard about this morning's confusion from the Mr. "Amusing Incident".（听说了今天早上还在困扰中的“乌龙事件”主角）
My response: It sounds like the Mister is still confused. It is not a surprise if you heard how confused some Miss Os and some Mister Os are, I heard they are still really confused.
（我的回应：听起来这先生还困扰着那。不过你要是听说了有几个O家先生O家小姐还在怎么样的多么的困扰着，你就一点都不觉得奇怪了。）
I heard the family confusion of Mr. "Amusing Incident" was clarified according to laws in the radio program for a four-days-time between June 7th of 2018 -June 10th of 2018, and June 11th-14th of 2018 broadcasting was the "freedom of speech" of what else has been confusing to them after the 4-days major clarification according to the laws. What you heard today is the impact of what else has been so confusing. It won't be surprising if there is something else still very confusing. Just listen to the radio program.
（我听说“乌龙”先生家的困扰在法律上的澄清是广播剧2018年6月7日-10日的四天的播出内容，2018年6月11日-14日是“乌龙先生”家里还在为什么而困扰的"言论自由的表达”，你今天听到的就是在那四天依据法律进行的大体上的事件澄清之后，这个"乌龙“先生还在困扰什么所造成的后果/。这当然是一点都不奇怪啊，听众就继续听广播剧的”下回分解”吧。）
I believe laws are already at work on the radio program's producing. Being the majorly impacted major-featured-person of this radio program, I did keep on calling law enforcement's help as well to make sure the radio program is reporting these types of important matters, not scripting nor patching-up and nor over-writing after the lawful clarification.
（我相信法律已经在进行广播剧制作相关的执法工作。作为受广播剧影响最大的广播剧主要人物，我也一直在报警求助警方保障广播剧是在就这些重要内容进行报道而非编纂编辑内容，或者试图事后改写依据法律所做的真相澄清。）
Freedom of speech, granted by the United States' Constitution, is the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint. Freedom of speech is the right to verbally express, never the right to verbally take over any format of any physically existing entity nor any financial valuables.（美国人的言论自由是由美国宪法赋予美国公民的权利。言论自由的权利是可以不受压制不受限制的用语言来表达的权力， 从来不是用语言来夺取合法被其他人所拥有的任何物质存在及任何财产财务的权利。）
06-07-2018 Amusing incident （乌龙事件）
----June 27th, 2018
听说了于家就是没法明白。（Heard Yu's families are so confused)
我的回应：我现在还在听究竟于家是个什么故事。(My response: I am still listening exactly what has been the story.)
于家认为他们当年可以把钱留下，该美国公司既没有追究也没停止付款，就已经表明了于家就是应该继续拿钱。Yu's families think the American "Pejoves" Fund company did not stop wiring the money the entire time fully aware of Yu's families had kept all the wired money to themselves should mean granting Yu's families to own the money.
该美国公司其实对此已经说的很清楚. (The American company already clarified this clearly:)
- 这钱从1967年7月开始支付是汇给我方敏的，从来不是汇给于家的。(The wire started in the July of 1967 immediately after my birth, none of these Yu's families was the wire's intended recipient)
- 在我方敏1996年10月离开中国，公司向中国的此项汇款就立即停止了。(The wiring to China stopped immediately in October of 1996 when I left China to the United States.)
- 从1997年1月起，公司已经用我方敏的名字作为支付该每月1万美金的账务支付理由。(My name Min Fang has been booked as the reason for the $10,000 monthly check payment in the American company's accounting record since January of 1997)
我个人认为公司在1967年7月至1996年10月期间，在明知我方敏及我父母从未收到该项汇款的情况下，从未停止支付该项汇款的原因：（My personal opinion regarding the reasons that the American company did not stop the wiring after aware of my family never received any money:)
- 是为了保障如果我方敏有需要紧急用款的情况下，公司可以通过中国政府协助在中国当地想办法尽快拿到钱款。我父母两人当时的工资一共只有40元左右，美国公司的汇款是每月一万美金。(It is to ensure if I would be in any kind of emergency, with the Chinese government's help, the company could reach out to get emergency funding locally. My parents' joint income was only about ￥40 ($40) per month when I was born. The wire was $10,000 per month)
- 在中美两国1967年没有建立外交关系的现实情况下，一切为了保障我方敏的最大利益。（It is for my best interest to do so when there was no diplomatic relationship between the United States and the People's Republic of China.)
- 在于家从未与该美国公司有过任何工作生意业务及其他任何关联是事实的情况下，在于家和该汇款美国公司也从来没有任何投资及被投资关联也是事实的情况下，于家要求该美国公司继续向于家付款实属莫名奇妙，于家这一莫名其妙的要求居然会由中国的这一届政府在支持更是离谱至极。(It is ridiculous for Yu's families to request the American company to continuingly providing money to them when it has been the truthful facts that none of Yu's families ever had any business association nor investing association with the American company, it is more absurd when this ridiculous request could be supported by this administration of the People's Republic of China.)
----2018年6月27日。
Tuesday, June 26, 2018
06-26-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设
06-26-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
I, Min Fang, never against Chinese Communist Party's ruling over the land of China.
I, Min Fang, never against China to be a lawful country.
I, Min Fang, inherited Trusts from my own deceased birth grandfathers on June 30th of 2004.
I, Min Fang, never demand any living male's penis money, and I never receive any penis money nor voluntary compensation for any sort of abusiveness. It is well-known no-secret to the entertainment industry since July of 2004 that "there was never any prominent penis associate to this radio program" to confuse anyone as if I have been the major featured person from any penis business.
I, Min Fang, refuse to provide financial assistance specially &intentionally to anyone who is convicted by the Laws of the People's Republic of China.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any unauthorized person spend my money.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let anyone spend my own money against my own wish.
2004年已经继承了从来都是表明2004年就已经收到了2004年时已经死了的死人留下来的钱，2004年已经
----originally published May 9th, 2018, updated on June 26th, 2018
05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
我方敏从未反对中国共产党对中国960万平方公里土地的管理和统治权， 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
我方敏反对中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以他们共同利益相关的程虹作为提拔标准来选拔任用中国的国家及地区的领导者，我方敏反对中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以他们共同利益相关的程虹作为中华人民共和国的最高国家利益的唯一准则以及中华人民共和国法制权益的特别高级的拥有者。
我方敏从未在乎中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以及其他已经公开宣布的中国政府官员和他们所共同挚爱的程虹共居一室拥有他们自己的私人恋爱性生活或者一妻多夫的父母子女家庭生活，但我方敏坚决反对中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以他们和程虹的恋爱及性行为作为全面篡夺中华人民共和国的党政军权力及立法司法权力的原因和理由。
我方敏所投诉的一直就是我方敏在作为中国公民在海外生活期间以及我方敏在成为美国公民（2015年6月）以后被中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以中国国家政权以及中国政府资源所侵犯的中国公民合法权益（2015年6月前），我也已经向美国政府投诉我成为美国公民后被中国政府以中国国家政权所侵犯的美国公民合法权益。
我方敏坚决反对阻碍中华人民共和国法制建设的任何行为， 我方敏坚决拒绝特意向违反中华人民共和国法律的人士提供任何财务资助的任何企图。
----05-09-2018
任何够资格在大众广播频道上扯着嗓门向我要钱的人：
1：
2：
3：
4： 请出示我方敏必须按照中国法律和美国法律必须归还本应由你及你的
5：请注意，按照中国法律和美国法律对财产继承的定义，继承从被
6：我是从2004年6月30日开始宣称继承了钱财，
7： 请回答为何不上民事诉讼法庭解决所有这些民事法庭上就可以依据法
请参阅：
----最早发布于2018年5月23日。
Monday, June 25, 2018
06-25-2018 Chinese Premier Zhou and my $10, 000 monthly providing (中国的周恩来总理和我每月一万元的生活费用给付）
06-25-2018 Chinese Premier Zhou and my $10, 000 monthly providing (中国的周恩来总理和我每月一万元的生活费用给付）
Heard this morning's broadcasting of Chinese Premier Zhou.
My response: The reason why only one line of harsh saying "Premier Zhou is childless" was broadcasted is possibly to imply I am the similarly, but I do have my biological children.
I heard the producer of this line was Jessica O'Connor who mothers a Miss Ford, the 2013 presented girl who tends to fall into sleep holding her father's sleeve. The problem this Jessica O'Connor with me is the same problem a "Matilda Shimmel" has with me, but surely none of my business problem.
Jessica O'Connor has a daughter identically resembles another Miss Ford who is one of the four children broadcasted as all mothered by a British but a pair resembles the birth father's cousin. The confusion is the cousin don't resemble each other, the trick is they both partially resemble their great-great-great-great-great grandfather to the extreme.
So, whatever the birthfather's family have explained about the birth mother, this Jessica O'Connor just won't listen. I have screamed in my apartment a lot to say that my daughter, published in 2012, resembles me to the obvious, not her farther-side anyone nor O'Connor anyone. I hope someone can help her to get this.
----June 25th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到中国的周恩来总理和毛泽东主席开会的会议记录。
我的回应：
首先，
我实在是太荣幸了，周恩来总理和毛泽东主席他们两个是我最推崇的中国共产党人。我对他们的军事才华，文学功底甚至他们的书法都实在是太崇拜了。不过我不认同他们对1949年前还只是初级资本主义时期生产力还不发达的中国只需要大众一心就已经可以实现天下大同没有财富差别的这种理念，我认为“打土豪分田地”只是无为拆塔并不能促进创造与建设，聚沙成塔以拥有足够财力为人民为大众谋福利只需通过促进生产力以实现在税务法律法规管理下的应缴税基数提高就可以实现。
我自己的财产我自己管理就很好，永远不需要中国政府干涉我作为美国公民的合法私有财富。
其次，
我今天早上的原话是“周恩来是断子绝孙的，（他的观点再吓人都不会被认为是为了谋私利），你们现在是把中国的十三亿人民都当成是断子绝孙的”，你们才会认为别人都应该顶礼膜拜你们可以性交生孩子的能力，否则怎么才十三，十四岁的女孩不学好不务正业，满大街的可以到处屁股被人摸，又违反国家计划生育政策，才十几岁的初高中生在中学读书期间就未婚生了一个孩子，大学就读期间又生了两个让别人养着还没被按照中国国家政策退学，这些怎么成了你们中华人民共和国这一届政府所宣传的对中华人民共和国以及对13亿中国人民最大的贡献了？***现任国务院总理的老婆在读书期间生三个孩子，婚后三次足月怀孕只在医院产一女是海外传言。
我拒绝相信你们这届中国政府以及你们这届中国政府参与广播剧制作推广的工作人员。我拒绝你们这届中国政府以及你们这届中国政府参与广播剧制作推广的工作人员对我的敲诈勒索要求。我自己的财产我自己管理就很好。
我认为你们这些所谓的中国国家政府工作人员要是能把中国国库的钱也就是13亿中国人民的国库款项管理成为不是一个男女性交成果奖励金的金库，你们就已经是很好很有才华很清楚什么是人民的利益这么一群政府工作人员了。我确实是从心眼里认为你们根本就是一群娼妓院的娼妓加婊子养的才会认为中国十三亿人民的国库甚至我作为美国公民的合法私有财产是会为你们的性交乱操付费的。
第三：
至于为什么只播出那一句“断子绝孙”，那是为了影射我， 是因为一个Jessica O’Connor小姐（一个福特孩子妈）认定我女儿和她的女儿共一个爹，就因为她孩子爹有个堂兄弟的女儿和她的小孩长得像亲姊妹。2012年发表的我的女儿影视录像已经很明显呈现了她长得像我不像爹。那个女孩的亲爹也已经在广播剧上说明了那个女孩的亲妈是个英国女人。这个O家小姐似乎就是不准我有自己亲生小孩的意思，根本就是一个变态精神病类似。
第四，
就今天早上的毛周两个人的谈话内容是否和我有关，得看这是什么时候的谈话。那一万美金的生活费用是在中国政府同意后才由香港汇入中国， 中国政府知情是确定的。但我是这家公司的投资机构（信托）的唯一受益人这个事实只有在我出生后才能确定，所以这一万美金的生活费用汇入是在我1967年7月20日出生后才向中国政府提出的申请。
今天早上的广播剧据说是由周恩来的“私生子”在畅谈，说其实是周恩来不准这汇入的一万元钱归我方敏所拥有，说其实是因为周恩来想把这钱给他自己的“亲生孩子”，也就是说这是在由周恩来总理自己的“亲生孩子”通过广播剧来向全国世界人民公开说明周恩来总理从来就不是什么全心全意为人民的好总理而是个专谋私利的乌龟王八蛋。
我会认为周恩来确实会认为我一个小孩在他们心目中的理想国度里出生怎么还需要私人拥有财产而非公共拥有，这对于共产主义理想的不同理解也是美国和中国当时没有外交关系的原因，所以不足为奇。但我相信周恩来是不会认为别人把这一万元钱拿走作为私人使用就是应该的。
----2018年6月25日。
Heard this morning's broadcasting of Chinese Premier Zhou.
My response: The reason why only one line of harsh saying "Premier Zhou is childless" was broadcasted is possibly to imply I am the similarly, but I do have my biological children.
I heard the producer of this line was Jessica O'Connor who mothers a Miss Ford, the 2013 presented girl who tends to fall into sleep holding her father's sleeve. The problem this Jessica O'Connor with me is the same problem a "Matilda Shimmel" has with me, but surely none of my business problem.
Jessica O'Connor has a daughter identically resembles another Miss Ford who is one of the four children broadcasted as all mothered by a British but a pair resembles the birth father's cousin. The confusion is the cousin don't resemble each other, the trick is they both partially resemble their great-great-great-great-great grandfather to the extreme.
So, whatever the birthfather's family have explained about the birth mother, this Jessica O'Connor just won't listen. I have screamed in my apartment a lot to say that my daughter, published in 2012, resembles me to the obvious, not her farther-side anyone nor O'Connor anyone. I hope someone can help her to get this.
----June 25th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到中国的周恩来总理和毛泽东主席开会的会议记录。
我的回应：
首先，
我实在是太荣幸了，周恩来总理和毛泽东主席他们两个是我最推崇的中国共产党人。我对他们的军事才华，文学功底甚至他们的书法都实在是太崇拜了。不过我不认同他们对1949年前还只是初级资本主义时期生产力还不发达的中国只需要大众一心就已经可以实现天下大同没有财富差别的这种理念，我认为“打土豪分田地”只是无为拆塔并不能促进创造与建设，聚沙成塔以拥有足够财力为人民为大众谋福利只需通过促进生产力以实现在税务法律法规管理下的应缴税基数提高就可以实现。
我自己的财产我自己管理就很好，永远不需要中国政府干涉我作为美国公民的合法私有财富。
其次，
我今天早上的原话是“周恩来是断子绝孙的，（他的观点再吓人都不会被认为是为了谋私利），你们现在是把中国的十三亿人民都当成是断子绝孙的”，你们才会认为别人都应该顶礼膜拜你们可以性交生孩子的能力，否则怎么才十三，十四岁的女孩不学好不务正业，满大街的可以到处屁股被人摸，又违反国家计划生育政策，才十几岁的初高中生在中学读书期间就未婚生了一个孩子，大学就读期间又生了两个让别人养着还没被按照中国国家政策退学，这些怎么成了你们中华人民共和国这一届政府所宣传的对中华人民共和国以及对13亿中国人民最大的贡献了？***现任国务院总理的老婆在读书期间生三个孩子，婚后三次足月怀孕只在医院产一女是海外传言。
我拒绝相信你们这届中国政府以及你们这届中国政府参与广播剧制作推广的工作人员。我拒绝你们这届中国政府以及你们这届中国政府参与广播剧制作推广的工作人员对我的敲诈勒索要求。我自己的财产我自己管理就很好。
我认为你们这些所谓的中国国家政府工作人员要是能把中国国库的钱也就是13亿中国人民的国库款项管理成为不是一个男女性交成果奖励金的金库，你们就已经是很好很有才华很清楚什么是人民的利益这么一群政府工作人员了。我确实是从心眼里认为你们根本就是一群娼妓院的娼妓加婊子养的才会认为中国十三亿人民的国库甚至我作为美国公民的合法私有财产是会为你们的性交乱操付费的。
第三：
至于为什么只播出那一句“断子绝孙”，那是为了影射我， 是因为一个Jessica O’Connor小姐（一个福特孩子妈）认定我女儿和她的女儿共一个爹，就因为她孩子爹有个堂兄弟的女儿和她的小孩长得像亲姊妹。2012年发表的我的女儿影视录像已经很明显呈现了她长得像我不像爹。那个女孩的亲爹也已经在广播剧上说明了那个女孩的亲妈是个英国女人。这个O家小姐似乎就是不准我有自己亲生小孩的意思，根本就是一个变态精神病类似。
第四，
就今天早上的毛周两个人的谈话内容是否和我有关，得看这是什么时候的谈话。那一万美金的生活费用是在中国政府同意后才由香港汇入中国， 中国政府知情是确定的。但我是这家公司的投资机构（信托）的唯一受益人这个事实只有在我出生后才能确定，所以这一万美金的生活费用汇入是在我1967年7月20日出生后才向中国政府提出的申请。
今天早上的广播剧据说是由周恩来的“私生子”在畅谈，说其实是周恩来不准这汇入的一万元钱归我方敏所拥有，说其实是因为周恩来想把这钱给他自己的“亲生孩子”，也就是说这是在由周恩来总理自己的“亲生孩子”通过广播剧来向全国世界人民公开说明周恩来总理从来就不是什么全心全意为人民的好总理而是个专谋私利的乌龟王八蛋。
我会认为周恩来确实会认为我一个小孩在他们心目中的理想国度里出生怎么还需要私人拥有财产而非公共拥有，这对于共产主义理想的不同理解也是美国和中国当时没有外交关系的原因，所以不足为奇。但我相信周恩来是不会认为别人把这一万元钱拿走作为私人使用就是应该的。
----2018年6月25日。
Sunday, June 24, 2018
06-24-2018 Inheriting Tax && 究竟是文艺演出还是严重违法违宪活动？
06-24-2018 Inheriting Tax && 究竟是文艺演出还是严重违法违宪活动？
Heard this morning's talk of my inheriting tax.
My response: Yes, my Trusts were not eligible for the estate tax (I was a foreigner inheriting foreign settlers' trusts), and Connecticut state I was a resident of was having tax free for AA type (grandparents-grandchild) inheriting on June 30th of 2004, so, this inheriting tax would be willingness-based inheriting tax paying.
I was told I could do this willingness-based tax paying on the inheriting day which was June 30th of 2004, but I was too excited that I could save inheriting tax so I answered happily: "why would I ever pay tax when I don't have to."
So, it is now.
----June 24th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到了就是要我付钱。
我的回应：我拒绝今天早上向我提出的要钱要求。我就是要提醒这个女的，我没有男睾具，不会觉得你说这些话很讨喜，就只觉得你很烦人很讨厌。
我现在真是很烦，整个所谓中国演出，根本就是编造故事以讹诈，欺诈和敲诈，并借此制造中国13亿人民对我方敏个人的误解不满以煽动针对我方敏个人的仇恨和敌视。
最著名的例子就是所谓的我欠了中国人民解放军军费一亿多人民币或者美金。最早这是一个文艺演出编纂的故事，说的是中国人民解放军的一个军人因工伤被送往美国军队予以治疗，然后就说要我付钱，但因是因公负伤，我又是美军退役军官（真实）在美国生活了已经20年，美军很清楚我和中国军方没有任何私人往来且没有任何法律依据应该由我付帐，所以在这个故事里，美军就把账单给了中国人民解放军，中国人民解放军也把帐给付了。结果，后续的所谓演出就变成了凭什么中国军费这么花费，就应该算成是我欠了中国人民解放军军费，并因此煽动了13亿中国人民就是要我还钱的呼声，你说这是文艺演出，还是制造仇恨事端以实施讹诈欺诈和敲诈勒索？
我破口痛骂中国政府从2015年开始有组织进行的文艺演出的原因就是因为所有这些文艺演出都是至少是涉嫌严重违法违宪侵犯我的法律权益及基本人权的行为。
这场所谓文艺演出的主题就是"你他妈的你以为你自己是谁?", 基本大纲就是只准痛骂我方敏是个单身女人独自生活就是个已经被事实证明了的没人要的东西，只准我方敏去捡垃圾否则不准有口饭吃，不准我方敏花我自己的钱，不准我方敏有我自己的生活，不准我方敏说话，就是不准，就是不准，就是不准。
这还是文艺演出啊？美国方面参与支持这个演出的的一些人也是被我向美国警方指控严重性骚扰及敲诈勒索谋财害命。
有人说我应该向中国政府解释就不会这样了。解释什么? 我是因为脑控癌没有隐私所以一个人在美国麻州波士顿生活，中国政府应该很清楚我是一个人生活且已经居住美国20年了，什么时候开始单身华裔女人就成了中国政府应该组织人力物力进行谩骂羞辱的？这届中国北京中央政府究竟是一个犯罪团伙的组织机构还是一个法制国家的政府啊？
我就是说这根本是一群北京老娼妓的做法，只要是条男睾具他们就是够资格闹吃醋，这不是一群街上的骚母狗根本实在弄不清这条那条男睾具根本就不是捅过了他们的那条，还能是什么呀？也可能他们是男睾具共用也就是共妻共睾主义，或者这条那条男睾具是个公用睾具，反正结果就是只要一个给捅过那是一群都够资格闹吃醋。我的结论就是这一群一伙的不是一群老娼妓就是一伙老黄脸老骚母狗给骚成了精神病黄脸老骚母狗。
至于说我花了R家很多钱就是该被他们家的女人痛骂并把我的钱拿光的说法，我的解释是我是2017上半年在波士顿96.9FM广播电台上时才听说R家认为我2004年7月1日花的是R家的钱且是未经许可并利用公共场合进行勒索，我对此的公开回应当时就已经是我方敏从来没有花过R家的钱，我方敏2004年7月1日花钱当时就没开口跟R家要过或者问一声R家愿不愿意为我花钱，我在花我自己刚继承的钱，我问R家干嘛？我事后就没打过一个电话给R家要求R家任何人支付我的生活费用，我方敏也从来就不知道R家的银行账号信息，怎么花R家的钱？ 更何况R家开的支票都是一些对娱乐业的投资项目像是百老汇歌舞剧以及街道医院等等，都是目前已知已经赚钱的投资。2004年7月1日那天非投资性的开销也就是我以及我的父母子女的医疗保安给付及我现在一直在找的我的生活费给付，都是我自己所继承的信托予以支付的开销。所谓我花了R家很多钱的误会目前都已经一切由我的律师予以处理了。可这和中国政府有什么关系啊？
还有一个误会，我是今年才听说，就是在2004年7月1日我快乐告知众人我继承了大笔财产时，有人好奇问我究竟是谁给我的钱，我回答说是我爷爷的，但我没被告知是那一代的爷爷，所以我当时就开始扳手指头数一数究竟可能是哪个爷爷，才数了5代爷爷，就被“勒令”停止，说我贪得无厌五个（男人）还不够，我当时就没闹明白，还傻傻回答“好像不太够”。那是，这些公司在美国就已经400年了，至少是十代以前的爷爷给我的。我就是因此被海外华裔社区骂了十几年的婊子破鞋，今年（2018年）才听说就因为我当时是在数手指头。我能解释什么？
----2018年6月24日。
Heard this morning's talk of my inheriting tax.
My response: Yes, my Trusts were not eligible for the estate tax (I was a foreigner inheriting foreign settlers' trusts), and Connecticut state I was a resident of was having tax free for AA type (grandparents-grandchild) inheriting on June 30th of 2004, so, this inheriting tax would be willingness-based inheriting tax paying.
I was told I could do this willingness-based tax paying on the inheriting day which was June 30th of 2004, but I was too excited that I could save inheriting tax so I answered happily: "why would I ever pay tax when I don't have to."
So, it is now.
----June 24th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到了就是要我付钱。
我的回应：我拒绝今天早上向我提出的要钱要求。我就是要提醒这个女的，我没有男睾具，不会觉得你说这些话很讨喜，就只觉得你很烦人很讨厌。
我现在真是很烦，整个所谓中国演出，根本就是编造故事以讹诈，欺诈和敲诈，并借此制造中国13亿人民对我方敏个人的误解不满以煽动针对我方敏个人的仇恨和敌视。
最著名的例子就是所谓的我欠了中国人民解放军军费一亿多人民币或者美金。最早这是一个文艺演出编纂的故事，说的是中国人民解放军的一个军人因工伤被送往美国军队予以治疗，然后就说要我付钱，但因是因公负伤，我又是美军退役军官（真实）在美国生活了已经20年，美军很清楚我和中国军方没有任何私人往来且没有任何法律依据应该由我付帐，所以在这个故事里，美军就把账单给了中国人民解放军，中国人民解放军也把帐给付了。结果，后续的所谓演出就变成了凭什么中国军费这么花费，就应该算成是我欠了中国人民解放军军费，并因此煽动了13亿中国人民就是要我还钱的呼声，你说这是文艺演出，还是制造仇恨事端以实施讹诈欺诈和敲诈勒索？
我破口痛骂中国政府从2015年开始有组织进行的文艺演出的原因就是因为所有这些文艺演出都是至少是涉嫌严重违法违宪侵犯我的法律权益及基本人权的行为。
这场所谓文艺演出的主题就是"你他妈的你以为你自己是谁?", 基本大纲就是只准痛骂我方敏是个单身女人独自生活就是个已经被事实证明了的没人要的东西，只准我方敏去捡垃圾否则不准有口饭吃，不准我方敏花我自己的钱，不准我方敏有我自己的生活，不准我方敏说话，就是不准，就是不准，就是不准。
这还是文艺演出啊？美国方面参与支持这个演出的的一些人也是被我向美国警方指控严重性骚扰及敲诈勒索谋财害命。
有人说我应该向中国政府解释就不会这样了。解释什么? 我是因为脑控癌没有隐私所以一个人在美国麻州波士顿生活，中国政府应该很清楚我是一个人生活且已经居住美国20年了，什么时候开始单身华裔女人就成了中国政府应该组织人力物力进行谩骂羞辱的？这届中国北京中央政府究竟是一个犯罪团伙的组织机构还是一个法制国家的政府啊？
我就是说这根本是一群北京老娼妓的做法，只要是条男睾具他们就是够资格闹吃醋，这不是一群街上的骚母狗根本实在弄不清这条那条男睾具根本就不是捅过了他们的那条，还能是什么呀？也可能他们是男睾具共用也就是共妻共睾主义，或者这条那条男睾具是个公用睾具，反正结果就是只要一个给捅过那是一群都够资格闹吃醋。我的结论就是这一群一伙的不是一群老娼妓就是一伙老黄脸老骚母狗给骚成了精神病黄脸老骚母狗。
至于说我花了R家很多钱就是该被他们家的女人痛骂并把我的钱拿光的说法，我的解释是我是2017上半年在波士顿96.9FM广播电台上时才听说R家认为我2004年7月1日花的是R家的钱且是未经许可并利用公共场合进行勒索，我对此的公开回应当时就已经是我方敏从来没有花过R家的钱，我方敏2004年7月1日花钱当时就没开口跟R家要过或者问一声R家愿不愿意为我花钱，我在花我自己刚继承的钱，我问R家干嘛？我事后就没打过一个电话给R家要求R家任何人支付我的生活费用，我方敏也从来就不知道R家的银行账号信息，怎么花R家的钱？ 更何况R家开的支票都是一些对娱乐业的投资项目像是百老汇歌舞剧以及街道医院等等，都是目前已知已经赚钱的投资。2004年7月1日那天非投资性的开销也就是我以及我的父母子女的医疗保安给付及我现在一直在找的我的生活费给付，都是我自己所继承的信托予以支付的开销。所谓我花了R家很多钱的误会目前都已经一切由我的律师予以处理了。可这和中国政府有什么关系啊？
还有一个误会，我是今年才听说，就是在2004年7月1日我快乐告知众人我继承了大笔财产时，有人好奇问我究竟是谁给我的钱，我回答说是我爷爷的，但我没被告知是那一代的爷爷，所以我当时就开始扳手指头数一数究竟可能是哪个爷爷，才数了5代爷爷，就被“勒令”停止，说我贪得无厌五个（男人）还不够，我当时就没闹明白，还傻傻回答“好像不太够”。那是，这些公司在美国就已经400年了，至少是十代以前的爷爷给我的。我就是因此被海外华裔社区骂了十几年的婊子破鞋，今年（2018年）才听说就因为我当时是在数手指头。我能解释什么？
----2018年6月24日。
Saturday, June 23, 2018
06-23-2018 Boston's Park Street Church and 1989's Chinese students' movement
06-23-2018 Boston's Park Street Church and 1989's Chinese students' movement
Heard about this morning's Boston's Park Street Church and 1989.
My response: Boston's Park Street Church is not a Catholic church, and I was never a patron visitor of the Boston's Park Street Church but a "homeless of its street-level open balcony" who never in any situation having an opportunity to introduce myself or to mention any name from the New York City, I was just the anonymous Chinese homeless who has a show on the radio with a name of Min Fang.
I have no idea why of this morning's anxiety and whom it regards, but I have been complaining of this organized "paid to shit" scheme since November of 2015 when the famous British Crown Prince and his famous wife started to patch up stories how I had intruded their private life in London of United Kindom of Britain when I was a "homeless" or a resident of the public housing in Boston, Massachusetts of the United States. I have accused the organizer of this "paid to shit" scheme Albert Gore has been intended to Murder for Money, I am wondering other than the intellectual income this Albert Gore had stolen from me and others with invalid "Judge's ruling", where this payment to "shit me all over" should be expected from?
I heard 1989's students' movement was supported by this big group of participants of this "paid to shit" scheme, was I blamed for being the person who advised not to put tons of Chinese people into financial desperation in that special economic transition time of the 1980s? Why is this?
Does this group ever think from their own election system that free election does not mean the blindfold election that well-informed voters are absolutely necessary to have the fair election to choose a candidate from the expectation out of knowing who the candidate is and what the candidate can do for the voters? Does this group know these well-informed voters need to be informed by a system which can't be achieved overnight by the college students marching on the streets?
Does this group know when streets were blocked, there were tons of business in this situation may go bankrupt and 1989's China did not have the social welfare system to support the jobless, nor an open labor market to find a job? A bankrupt business in 1989 means the entire staff of the business would not have a single penny income for the rest of their lives to buy any food nor to support their families? China had started some policies to allow private small business in the 1980s was to ease this financial desperation situation that caused by the China's economic system transmitting fron the planned economy to the market economy, why this group still think as such today that this big population (6%) of Chinese people's potential financial desperation meant nothing at all to them to wish to severe it?
I was wondering why this group want the People's Republic of China to have such a government as the current administration who are famous now for their "Don't serve the People but get paid to enjoy the excessive powers & special privileges that never granted by the People's Republic of China's Constitution", why this group enjoy to see so much anger from the 1.3Billion Chinese People instead of their happy spirits?
I heard this group may say their understanding of letting Chinese people happy is to make my life bankrupt as they have participated, I say how do they know it is the Chinese 1.3 Billion People who want to kill me in order to have some money only worth their several months' salary each? Why this group would fancy that the Chinese people are not the hard working people willing to make their own money as they always have been?
Like I have pointed out, a creator of a movie is different with a producer, a director, or a scriptwriter, it is the same in a country's governing. The public posts are policymakers, the Congress is lawmakers, and the government employees are administrative & executive groups of the laws and policies.
Why I have been denied for who I am when my contributions to China such as Megacity subways, covered Green Farms, desert developing, etc are all originally my creative thoughts to benefit Chinese people which inspired these regional economic projects that have been administered by the local, provincial and central government of the People's Republic of China?
Exactly who is fighting this title of thought-creator of these economic projects from the People's Republic of China government?
----June 23rd, 2018
Heard about this morning's Boston's Park Street Church and 1989.
My response: Boston's Park Street Church is not a Catholic church, and I was never a patron visitor of the Boston's Park Street Church but a "homeless of its street-level open balcony" who never in any situation having an opportunity to introduce myself or to mention any name from the New York City, I was just the anonymous Chinese homeless who has a show on the radio with a name of Min Fang.
I have no idea why of this morning's anxiety and whom it regards, but I have been complaining of this organized "paid to shit" scheme since November of 2015 when the famous British Crown Prince and his famous wife started to patch up stories how I had intruded their private life in London of United Kindom of Britain when I was a "homeless" or a resident of the public housing in Boston, Massachusetts of the United States. I have accused the organizer of this "paid to shit" scheme Albert Gore has been intended to Murder for Money, I am wondering other than the intellectual income this Albert Gore had stolen from me and others with invalid "Judge's ruling", where this payment to "shit me all over" should be expected from?
I heard 1989's students' movement was supported by this big group of participants of this "paid to shit" scheme, was I blamed for being the person who advised not to put tons of Chinese people into financial desperation in that special economic transition time of the 1980s? Why is this?
Does this group ever think from their own election system that free election does not mean the blindfold election that well-informed voters are absolutely necessary to have the fair election to choose a candidate from the expectation out of knowing who the candidate is and what the candidate can do for the voters? Does this group know these well-informed voters need to be informed by a system which can't be achieved overnight by the college students marching on the streets?
Does this group know when streets were blocked, there were tons of business in this situation may go bankrupt and 1989's China did not have the social welfare system to support the jobless, nor an open labor market to find a job? A bankrupt business in 1989 means the entire staff of the business would not have a single penny income for the rest of their lives to buy any food nor to support their families? China had started some policies to allow private small business in the 1980s was to ease this financial desperation situation that caused by the China's economic system transmitting fron the planned economy to the market economy, why this group still think as such today that this big population (6%) of Chinese people's potential financial desperation meant nothing at all to them to wish to severe it?
I was wondering why this group want the People's Republic of China to have such a government as the current administration who are famous now for their "Don't serve the People but get paid to enjoy the excessive powers & special privileges that never granted by the People's Republic of China's Constitution", why this group enjoy to see so much anger from the 1.3Billion Chinese People instead of their happy spirits?
I heard this group may say their understanding of letting Chinese people happy is to make my life bankrupt as they have participated, I say how do they know it is the Chinese 1.3 Billion People who want to kill me in order to have some money only worth their several months' salary each? Why this group would fancy that the Chinese people are not the hard working people willing to make their own money as they always have been?
Like I have pointed out, a creator of a movie is different with a producer, a director, or a scriptwriter, it is the same in a country's governing. The public posts are policymakers, the Congress is lawmakers, and the government employees are administrative & executive groups of the laws and policies.
Why I have been denied for who I am when my contributions to China such as Megacity subways, covered Green Farms, desert developing, etc are all originally my creative thoughts to benefit Chinese people which inspired these regional economic projects that have been administered by the local, provincial and central government of the People's Republic of China?
Exactly who is fighting this title of thought-creator of these economic projects from the People's Republic of China government?
----June 23rd, 2018
Friday, June 22, 2018
06-22-2018 我和华裔社区的矛盾究竟是什么（1）
06-22-2018 我和华裔社区的矛盾究竟是什么（1）
听说很多听众认为我和波士顿的中国城超市一定矛盾很大。
我的回应：我也很奇怪他们怎们那么愤怒。
我就从来没去找过他们讨价还价，更不用说找经理人员聊天要折扣，也就是去买买菜，也就是柜台上放什么买什么。我现在还很少买菜，有将近1-2年很少买菜了，我这一两年不是外食就是买一次混几个星期这种。除了他们说的"非的拿光”是指我会买光摆放在货架上待卖的我喜欢的蔬果外，也就是“好东西都给我买走了”之外，实在不知道他们愤怒的是什么。以前在平价超市我是经常和一些站在旁边看我会不会“偷东西”的所谓华人顾客发生冲突，也因此和其经理部门关系紧张，但这种情形很少发生在这个中国城超市连锁。不过，平价超市现在已经是这个中国城超市连锁店的一部分了。
至于说到我自称是其投资人，他们是可以通过内部财会系统核实的。我所继承的信托在美国的基金公司(就是美国“Pejoves”基金公司）是一家专门投资的基金公司，对福特汽车的投资就已经至少是”爷爷级”啦，对中国的福特汽车更是至少是个“曾祖父级”，因为中间可能有个公司叫福特国际公司甚至还有一个福特亚洲公司。对波士顿中国城超市连锁可能是通过其他贸易公司的超市投资之类的且很有可能是至少4-5代的“曾祖父”级投资，能有什么矛盾？我那有可能没有任何凭据就到他们柜台上去要求现金给付？我还没经常去买菜他们就已经如此公开表达愤怒，还会因为莫名的害怕而不敢报警啊？
我就是奇怪他们哪来的那么多看不惯，我有钱还是没钱能有他们什么事啊？是谁就是这么看不惯，就是能有怎么大的愤怒这么响亮的声音啊？何况他们表达愤怒的广播剧就是以我为主要人物播出我的故事都已经有十几年了，按照美国的劳工法都没有可能没有一个子儿，哪里会需要他们看不惯我不肯打餐馆工挣口便宜饭吃啊？他们的超市是应该有律师懂法律的。他们也在麻州波士顿，他们是可以查询我作为麻州居民是否已经就我的广播剧收入向麻州总检察长办公室报警的。我2007年一月从电脑咨询员工作岗位辞职，当时的摩根大通银行同事就没人认为奇怪，就是因为广播剧是从2005年1月起就已经开播当时已经两年了，我那里还会需要做工拿一份工资吃饭啊。
我是自个瞎猜啊，凭我自己的亲身经历，一定是有人在他们的超市里搅混水想闷钱。借口这个借口那个，愤怒这个愤怒那个，这个就是不行那个就是不行，其实都是在忙着想收银箱里的钱。否则哪有那么大的需要对一个难的去买菜的我表达如此强烈如此被众所认可的“极大愤怒”啊？
我昨天去买菜，也是一路被人觉得滑稽，我估计是所谓的“最穷的富豪来了”特别滑稽。我当时已经是筋疲力尽了，所以只想买东西走人。美国麻州波士顿大学真的很多，生物工程研究的很多，所以知道我的脑控癌治疗情形的人也很多。我还真是没吹牛，广播上讲的我每天的治疗费用预算可能也不是瞎编，我自己确实不知道数额多少，但我确定是我自己在付钱治疗。我现在很少买菜也很少外食也是因为治疗，现在所谓的自动感染已经不是问题，就是累得不得了。
----2018年6月22日。
昨天在广播里表达愤怒不满的是我刚来美国时的纽约曼哈顿Jennifer的女儿。
我的回应：我就是在这个Jennifer夫妻俩的公寓房里于1996年认识了Charles Schnieberg (Charles Ford). Jennifer 的这个女儿已婚不和父母同住是Jennifer当年可以收留我入住的原因。我是最近才听说了她母亲Jennifer的离世，希望他们一家一切都好。
认识Charles Schnieberg (Charles Ford) 当时只有我和Jennifer在场，但我认识的这个人是个福特就是这个女儿发现的，所以昨天是由这个女儿在广播剧上说明我没有可能会和福特家的任何人有任何关系。我本人不清楚真相但也不是太在乎我自己的亲生孩子是否和福特这个名字有血缘上的关系。Like I said, I understood "the same size as Rockefellers" I was told on June 30th of 2004 as "With that s appended (not certain if appended or 's), I am a Rockefeller richer who is much wealthier than a Ford", why would I care?
至于她的愤怒可能和她被广播剧于2011年前后宣布而无奈离开她所喜欢的银行工作可能有关， 但我不是太清楚广播剧如此宣布的原因是什么。
至于这个女儿提到她很难理解我完全不珍惜她母亲Jennifer当年对我的收留，我的解释是我自1997年搬离他父母在曼哈顿的公寓以后就因为我自己工作学习忙碌，很难有完整的时间可以去经常探视她父母，从未单独和她父亲联络过，从来都是如有联络，都是只拨打电话给Jennifer本人就可以。但她母亲Jennifer于2004年6月中旬我探视她父母的时侯，在她父母与我聚餐的饭桌上当着她父亲的面莫名其妙的表达她母亲Jennifer自己很担心我会勾引她父亲，这是我从那天起就不可能和她父母再有任何联络的原因。
我是1999年9月起就已经是4-5万年薪的电脑程序员工作，H1签证，2004年绿卡申请的劳工卡就已经批准了，2005年4月就已经取得正式绿卡。我自2015年起就已经是美国公民了，通过工作移民取得，所以不会需要通过婚姻而拥有美国居民的合法身份，也不会需要和她及她的父亲取得联系。
我不是太清楚这是她本人表达还是广播剧制作效果，但我确实不会出于任何需要而和他们一家取得任何联系，他们一家帮不了我什么。
----2018年6月22日。
听说很多听众认为我和波士顿的中国城超市一定矛盾很大。
我的回应：我也很奇怪他们怎们那么愤怒。
我就从来没去找过他们讨价还价，更不用说找经理人员聊天要折扣，也就是去买买菜，也就是柜台上放什么买什么。我现在还很少买菜，有将近1-2年很少买菜了，我这一两年不是外食就是买一次混几个星期这种。除了他们说的"非的拿光”是指我会买光摆放在货架上待卖的我喜欢的蔬果外，也就是“好东西都给我买走了”之外，实在不知道他们愤怒的是什么。以前在平价超市我是经常和一些站在旁边看我会不会“偷东西”的所谓华人顾客发生冲突，也因此和其经理部门关系紧张，但这种情形很少发生在这个中国城超市连锁。不过，平价超市现在已经是这个中国城超市连锁店的一部分了。
至于说到我自称是其投资人，他们是可以通过内部财会系统核实的。我所继承的信托在美国的基金公司(就是美国“Pejoves”基金公司）是一家专门投资的基金公司，对福特汽车的投资就已经至少是”爷爷级”啦，对中国的福特汽车更是至少是个“曾祖父级”，因为中间可能有个公司叫福特国际公司甚至还有一个福特亚洲公司。对波士顿中国城超市连锁可能是通过其他贸易公司的超市投资之类的且很有可能是至少4-5代的“曾祖父”级投资，能有什么矛盾？我那有可能没有任何凭据就到他们柜台上去要求现金给付？我还没经常去买菜他们就已经如此公开表达愤怒，还会因为莫名的害怕而不敢报警啊？
我就是奇怪他们哪来的那么多看不惯，我有钱还是没钱能有他们什么事啊？是谁就是这么看不惯，就是能有怎么大的愤怒这么响亮的声音啊？何况他们表达愤怒的广播剧就是以我为主要人物播出我的故事都已经有十几年了，按照美国的劳工法都没有可能没有一个子儿，哪里会需要他们看不惯我不肯打餐馆工挣口便宜饭吃啊？他们的超市是应该有律师懂法律的。他们也在麻州波士顿，他们是可以查询我作为麻州居民是否已经就我的广播剧收入向麻州总检察长办公室报警的。我2007年一月从电脑咨询员工作岗位辞职，当时的摩根大通银行同事就没人认为奇怪，就是因为广播剧是从2005年1月起就已经开播当时已经两年了，我那里还会需要做工拿一份工资吃饭啊。
我是自个瞎猜啊，凭我自己的亲身经历，一定是有人在他们的超市里搅混水想闷钱。借口这个借口那个，愤怒这个愤怒那个，这个就是不行那个就是不行，其实都是在忙着想收银箱里的钱。否则哪有那么大的需要对一个难的去买菜的我表达如此强烈如此被众所认可的“极大愤怒”啊？
我昨天去买菜，也是一路被人觉得滑稽，我估计是所谓的“最穷的富豪来了”特别滑稽。我当时已经是筋疲力尽了，所以只想买东西走人。美国麻州波士顿大学真的很多，生物工程研究的很多，所以知道我的脑控癌治疗情形的人也很多。我还真是没吹牛，广播上讲的我每天的治疗费用预算可能也不是瞎编，我自己确实不知道数额多少，但我确定是我自己在付钱治疗。我现在很少买菜也很少外食也是因为治疗，现在所谓的自动感染已经不是问题，就是累得不得了。
----2018年6月22日。
昨天在广播里表达愤怒不满的是我刚来美国时的纽约曼哈顿Jennifer的女儿。
我的回应：我就是在这个Jennifer夫妻俩的公寓房里于1996年认识了Charles Schnieberg (Charles Ford). Jennifer 的这个女儿已婚不和父母同住是Jennifer当年可以收留我入住的原因。我是最近才听说了她母亲Jennifer的离世，希望他们一家一切都好。
认识Charles Schnieberg (Charles Ford) 当时只有我和Jennifer在场，但我认识的这个人是个福特就是这个女儿发现的，所以昨天是由这个女儿在广播剧上说明我没有可能会和福特家的任何人有任何关系。我本人不清楚真相但也不是太在乎我自己的亲生孩子是否和福特这个名字有血缘上的关系。Like I said, I understood "the same size as Rockefellers" I was told on June 30th of 2004 as "With that s appended (not certain if appended or 's), I am a Rockefeller richer who is much wealthier than a Ford", why would I care?
至于她的愤怒可能和她被广播剧于2011年前后宣布而无奈离开她所喜欢的银行工作可能有关， 但我不是太清楚广播剧如此宣布的原因是什么。
至于这个女儿提到她很难理解我完全不珍惜她母亲Jennifer当年对我的收留，我的解释是我自1997年搬离他父母在曼哈顿的公寓以后就因为我自己工作学习忙碌，很难有完整的时间可以去经常探视她父母，从未单独和她父亲联络过，从来都是如有联络，都是只拨打电话给Jennifer本人就可以。但她母亲Jennifer于2004年6月中旬我探视她父母的时侯，在她父母与我聚餐的饭桌上当着她父亲的面莫名其妙的表达她母亲Jennifer自己很担心我会勾引她父亲，这是我从那天起就不可能和她父母再有任何联络的原因。
我是1999年9月起就已经是4-5万年薪的电脑程序员工作，H1签证，2004年绿卡申请的劳工卡就已经批准了，2005年4月就已经取得正式绿卡。我自2015年起就已经是美国公民了，通过工作移民取得，所以不会需要通过婚姻而拥有美国居民的合法身份，也不会需要和她及她的父亲取得联系。
我不是太清楚这是她本人表达还是广播剧制作效果，但我确实不会出于任何需要而和他们一家取得任何联系，他们一家帮不了我什么。
----2018年6月22日。
Thursday, June 21, 2018
06-21-2018 那一片960万平方公里土地是一个共和国还是已经私家拥有？
06-21-2018 那一片960万平方公里土地是一个共和国还是已经私家实质拥有？
听说了今天早上提到的有关“私人认可却拥有实质上事实上的公权力”。
我的回应：我也持同样的观点。我在这个博客上痛骂的就是我一直以来的观点。
你自己没有能力，你就说你自己没有能力领导中国，你别说13亿人民里面就没有任何人有能力可以领导中国了，非得由你来当国家领导人，非得由你的男睾具来任命你唯一认可的女人性器官作为才是可以够资格有能力凭着你的睾具特别欣赏这么一个现实状况就必须让这个女性因为她自己的性器官就可以拥有实质上甚至事实上的只有13亿人民才能赋予的国家领导人公权力。
“没有办法”，“你说能怎么办”从来不是什么有领导能力者的语言和无奈表达，何况中国共产党始终强调的都是中国共产党对中国的集体领导，而非一些男女共产党员通过男女性交来实现对中国的集体领导。
我认为只要那960万平方公里土地还是或者说至少还是在号称是中华人民共和国的领土领海和领空，并不是私人可以传承的，就不应该由利益紧密相连的以一女对多男类别的性交关系组合来实现实质上事实上的性交集体来领导统治管理13亿人民的现实状态。
*共和国的定义：
共和政治的基本含义就是，国家和政府是公共的，而不是私人的，国家和政府应当为公共利益而努力，而不应当为私人利益而奋斗。共和政治的另一个基本含义是，国家各级政权机关的领导人不是继承的，不是世袭的，也不是命定的，而是由自由公正的选举产生的。因而，公正而自由的选举，是判断一个国家是否真正实行共和政治的又一基本准则。
（定义来源：https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9B%BD/579415 ）
05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
----2018年6月21日。
听说了有关“为什么方敏对于昨天美国军方的正式宣布不是特别敏感？”
我的回应：我和美国军方所宣布的R家当事人没有任何职业上工作上及金钱上的任何依附关系，双方私人财产从来都是独立，昨天美国军方的正式宣布是强调双方没有任何私人交往关系。
R家的财产是在1900年前后在美国开始发展兴旺，我所继承的信托是在1600年前后开始在美国投资茁壮成长并见证了美国这边土地由移民（殖民*）垦荒变成了美利坚合众国的历史。 双方财产没有重叠但有由专业经理人员进行的公司合作投资关系，我本人没有也不会直接参与公司的投资业务及经营管理。
*殖民和移民的区别：移民的国籍及人口管理随移居而改变。1776年独立以前的美国只是一片土地可以移居，但没有国家政府及人口管理，所以移居人口没有国籍的改变被称为殖民。
----2018年6月21日。
听说了今天早上提到的有关“私人认可却拥有实质上事实上的公权力”。
我的回应：我也持同样的观点。我在这个博客上痛骂的就是我一直以来的观点。
你自己没有能力，你就说你自己没有能力领导中国，你别说13亿人民里面就没有任何人有能力可以领导中国了，非得由你来当国家领导人，非得由你的男睾具来任命你唯一认可的女人性器官作为才是可以够资格有能力凭着你的睾具特别欣赏这么一个现实状况就必须让这个女性因为她自己的性器官就可以拥有实质上甚至事实上的只有13亿人民才能赋予的国家领导人公权力。
“没有办法”，“你说能怎么办”从来不是什么有领导能力者的语言和无奈表达，何况中国共产党始终强调的都是中国共产党对中国的集体领导，而非一些男女共产党员通过男女性交来实现对中国的集体领导。
我认为只要那960万平方公里土地还是或者说至少还是在号称是中华人民共和国的领土领海和领空，并不是私人可以传承的，就不应该由利益紧密相连的以一女对多男类别的性交关系组合来实现实质上事实上的性交集体来领导统治管理13亿人民的现实状态。
*共和国的定义：
共和政治的基本含义就是，国家和政府是公共的，而不是私人的，国家和政府应当为公共利益而努力，而不应当为私人利益而奋斗。共和政治的另一个基本含义是，国家各级政权机关的领导人不是继承的，不是世袭的，也不是命定的，而是由自由公正的选举产生的。因而，公正而自由的选举，是判断一个国家是否真正实行共和政治的又一基本准则。
（定义来源：https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9B%BD/579415 ）
05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。
----2018年6月21日。
听说了有关“为什么方敏对于昨天美国军方的正式宣布不是特别敏感？”
我的回应：我和美国军方所宣布的R家当事人没有任何职业上工作上及金钱上的任何依附关系，双方私人财产从来都是独立，昨天美国军方的正式宣布是强调双方没有任何私人交往关系。
R家的财产是在1900年前后在美国开始发展兴旺，我所继承的信托是在1600年前后开始在美国投资茁壮成长并见证了美国这边土地由移民（殖民*）垦荒变成了美利坚合众国的历史。 双方财产没有重叠但有由专业经理人员进行的公司合作投资关系，我本人没有也不会直接参与公司的投资业务及经营管理。
*殖民和移民的区别：移民的国籍及人口管理随移居而改变。1776年独立以前的美国只是一片土地可以移居，但没有国家政府及人口管理，所以移居人口没有国籍的改变被称为殖民。
----2018年6月21日。
Wednesday, June 20, 2018
06-20-2018 Why radio program has been so destructive? (为什么这个广播剧就是要砸，要毁坏？）
06-20-2018 Why radio program has been so destructive? (为什么这个广播剧就是要砸，要毁坏？）
Heard this morning's U.S. military's announcement.
My response: I heard it is requested and it is official.
----June 20th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about why this radio program is so destructive.
My response: I don't know what really happened but I have understood the destructiveness regarding who I am has been intentional and led by the central government of the People's Republic of China.
The Chinese community abroad, especially the Chinese mainland, join this destructive effort to self-promote own local advantages is my assumption.
I have already denounced myself from the Chinese community abroad.
I have announced I already I have no association with the People's Republic of China.
----June 20th, 2018
听说了今天早上美国军方的宣布。
我的回应：我听说这是应当事人要求宣布的，是正式宣布。
----2018年6月20日。
听说了今天早上提到广播剧为何就是要砸了要毁了我的一切。
我的回应：我不清楚事实真相是什么，对于通过广播剧及其推广活动，对我个人所进行的打砸毁灭等一切努力，我一直都理解为这一切都是故意有意所为，都是在中华人民共和国北京中央政府的领导下进行。
海外华裔社区，特别是海外大陆移民社区广泛参与这些针对我个人的打砸毁灭活动，我推测是为了拔高他们自己在海外当地的地位。
我已经宣布我不属于海外华裔社区。
我已经宣布我和中华人民共和国没有任何关系。
----2018年6月20日。
从2015年中国北京政府的态度公开化开始，就一点都不奇怪当初我爷爷决定留在中华人民共和国是否有可能让我爷爷，我父亲和我成为了中国北京政府的监视对象，很明显我们家从来不受中国北京政府欢迎。如果这是事实，我也不需要躲躲闪闪的而是直接公开指出这一点事实。如果任何人认为有需要向北京政府告知方敏对此事实的态度，我方敏不会阻拦。
我方敏是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人是真实，我方敏是1996年离开中国的，我现在已经是美国公民了。我方敏是否有政治立场已经和中华人民共和国及海外华裔社区没有任何关系， 请不要以任何借口认为我方敏没有中华人民共和国或者海外华裔社区就难以生存以避免不必要的误会。我方敏会捍卫我方敏自己作为美国公民的合法权利和利益，我方敏也绝不会就此犹豫妥协。如果任何人认为有需要向北京政府或海外华裔社区广为告知我方敏对此事实的态度，我方敏不会阻拦。
我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设
----2018年6月20日。
Heard this morning's U.S. military's announcement.
My response: I heard it is requested and it is official.
----June 20th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about why this radio program is so destructive.
My response: I don't know what really happened but I have understood the destructiveness regarding who I am has been intentional and led by the central government of the People's Republic of China.
The Chinese community abroad, especially the Chinese mainland, join this destructive effort to self-promote own local advantages is my assumption.
I have already denounced myself from the Chinese community abroad.
I have announced I already I have no association with the People's Republic of China.
----June 20th, 2018
听说了今天早上美国军方的宣布。
我的回应：我听说这是应当事人要求宣布的，是正式宣布。
----2018年6月20日。
听说了今天早上提到广播剧为何就是要砸了要毁了我的一切。
我的回应：我不清楚事实真相是什么，对于通过广播剧及其推广活动，对我个人所进行的打砸毁灭等一切努力，我一直都理解为这一切都是故意有意所为，都是在中华人民共和国北京中央政府的领导下进行。
海外华裔社区，特别是海外大陆移民社区广泛参与这些针对我个人的打砸毁灭活动，我推测是为了拔高他们自己在海外当地的地位。
我已经宣布我不属于海外华裔社区。
我已经宣布我和中华人民共和国没有任何关系。
----2018年6月20日。
从2015年中国北京政府的态度公开化开始，就一点都不奇怪当初我爷爷决定留在中华人民共和国是否有可能让我爷爷，我父亲和我成为了中国北京政府的监视对象，很明显我们家从来不受中国北京政府欢迎。如果这是事实，我也不需要躲躲闪闪的而是直接公开指出这一点事实。如果任何人认为有需要向北京政府告知方敏对此事实的态度，我方敏不会阻拦。
我方敏是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人是真实，我方敏是1996年离开中国的，我现在已经是美国公民了。我方敏是否有政治立场已经和中华人民共和国及海外华裔社区没有任何关系， 请不要以任何借口认为我方敏没有中华人民共和国或者海外华裔社区就难以生存以避免不必要的误会。我方敏会捍卫我方敏自己作为美国公民的合法权利和利益，我方敏也绝不会就此犹豫妥协。如果任何人认为有需要向北京政府或海外华裔社区广为告知我方敏对此事实的态度，我方敏不会阻拦。
----published in April, 2018 (标题"没有了你们永远都不意味着失去")
我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设
----2018年6月20日。
Tuesday, June 19, 2018
06-19-2018 华人世界的困扰 （The anger of "Why Americans only willing to give me money, not other former or current citizens from the same People's Republic of China")
06-19-2018 华人世界的困扰 （The anger of "Why Americans only willing to give me money, not other former or current citizens from the same People's Republic of China")
My explanation: This or that money is from this Trust or that Trust that I inherited, never from the American people, nor the American companies, nor the U.S. government.
My explanation: This or that money is from this Trust or that Trust that I inherited, never from the American people, nor the American companies, nor the U.S. government.
1：为什么美国人只肯给我钱，凭什么？
我的回应：这4亿美金那4亿美金都不是美国政府给的，也不是美国公司送的，都是我已经去世的爷爷生前留给我的那几个信托基金支付给我的。
现在吵得天翻地覆的就是由美国“Pejoves”基金支付的那个4亿美金。“乌龙事件”，于姓私人助理及于家故事，一个福特孩子妈Jessica O'Connor，今天的波士顿中国城超市，都是在反映究竟是谁不准我方敏花这4亿美金，究竟矛盾是什么。
乌龙事件的主人公是和这家美国基金公司的美国二等亲堂兄弟公司的名字相连，于家故事是和这家美国基金公司从1967年7月-1996年10月或年底所支付的每月一万美金的生活费相连，福特家人及中国城超市是和这家美国基金公司的投资相连，就我所知，还有故事待续。
所有这些矛盾，都造成了我在美国麻州波士顿日常生活中很多的向美国警方的投诉，包括我感觉陌生华人就是敢在非华裔邻居的惊讶目光下直接用钥匙开门进入我的公寓拿东西，还可以笑咪咪的拎了东西堂而皇之的就走。我的家里除了一点非常便宜衣服，就没有值钱东西。邮箱要是有支票寄来，我就担心收不收得到。银行里我也是只敢留一点钱，其他的都是全部现金提出随身携带，据说还被波士顿华裔社区向美国政府举报说我藏钱不报还一定要拿美国穷人补贴，好在我一直也在向美国政府就同一问题也就是我所继承的信托已经向波士顿及麻州支付的我的生活费究竟在哪里我为什么只有金额没法比的穷人补贴而进行投诉。我去华人超市餐馆消费，明明购物的现金是从我口袋里拿出，还有华人在旁吆喝担心我在他们店里偷钱偷东西，就像你们已经在广播里听到的波士顿平价超市的故事。
这一切除了因为中华人民共和国从2015年开始以用真实人物进行文艺演出为名，或编造或剪辑他人故事以实施栽赃谩骂造谣诽谤所造成的严重后果之外，还有就是我2004年继承财产时中国外交部的一些工作人员弄不清法律上的继承只能是继承死人钱，误以为我说我有钱继承是想拿美国那些还活得好好的有钱男人的性交钱，并广为宣传说我所说的这钱那钱其实是美国那些还活得好好的有钱男人不想给的性交钱所造成的美国华裔社区对我方敏老说自己有钱已经退休了不愿去做餐馆工挣生活费用的非常普遍的反感。我已经就这些全部向美国警方投诉了。
至于我的那些发明及智慧产权究竟怎么会事，是一些美国人及华裔从2005年广播剧在美国上线播出可能就开始的一些活动。我听说的是我的第一笔智慧产权收入是在2007年被广播剧宣布后被人提取，其他就像你们在广播剧里已经听到的，一切都在美国司法部门的调查当中。我以前一直以为我的发明是以额外的投资机会来答谢的，所以会由我所继承的信托进行投资，后来听说因为投资人是在太多所以公司付出的其实是现金智慧产权收入后我就报警处理了。
----2018年6月19日。
2：O家困扰的那家公司都已经说清了，你为什么还说自己有钱。
我的回应：那家公司是方敏所继承信托所投资的一家投资基金公司，这家美国基金公司由一家英国基金公司全资拥有，方敏所继承的信托是这家英国基金公司的上游投资机构。这是这家美国基金公司的英国投资基金公司已经说明的。
强调那家美国公司是独立运作公司由英国公司全资拥有，这是在强调现代企业管理学中的有钱可以投资的人和企业的专业管理能力不是同一个范畴的这么一个概念，这样的概念可以有利于公司的发展。我本人目前是MBA在读，很同意这种概念所以不需要反对或者争辩。
----2018年6月19日。
3: 继承信托和兄弟分家产（即继承遗产）的区别是什么。
我的回应：举个例子，大年初一那天，我那活的好好爷爷给了我一个红包压岁钱也就是设了一个信托基金给我，第二天也就是大年初二，我爷爷遇到车祸去世了，他的下一代也就是他的几个儿子要分家产的话，我拿到的压岁钱算不算他留下的遗产？当然不算啦，都已经在前一天给出去的钱啦，哪里还能算成是他自己死后留下的东西啊。
就因为这压岁钱红包是爷爷们在设立时就写好委托书（就是死后的遗嘱）还写得清清楚楚就给我一个人的，所以我所继承的信托基金是我一个人拥有。爷爷们只给我一个人这份压岁钱红包的原因就是因为我是家里2500年来唯一的有和他们一样的胎记掌纹的女孩，我的父亲没有就是因为我父亲虽然也有胎记掌纹，但他是个男孩，和给我压岁钱红包的那些爷爷们性别一样，一点都不稀奇。
我爷爷的弟妹和我父亲的弟妹是我唯一听说过的亲戚，我爷爷的弟妹对我父亲以及我父亲的弟妹对我也确实是亲戚相待是我愿意在我继承后送他们每家一份送给亲戚的礼物的原因。
1：中国政府司法部门所作的说明是：按照国际上的法律继承通行规则，法律继承行为发生所在地的法律是有效继承法律。
2：美国政府司法部门所作的说明是：按照美国法律，我方敏作为中国公民美国居民2004年6月30日在美国领土上的信托继承是合法有效继承。
3：美国基金公司所作的说明是：按照该公司内部法律文件及其上级投资公司说明，我方敏所继承的信托是该公司的上游投资公司，该公司是按其上级投资公司的指示支付我方敏费用。
这是我所知道的按照美国的以及中国的继承法及信托法的说法，如有异议，请出示相关法律事实依据及法律条款。
我向美国警方所投诉的就是为什么依据法律的财产拥有权说法居然可以被想要钱的人以“就是不同意，就是不理解，就是没法明白”为理由就必须让我给钱或者不准我用我自己合法继承的钱。
----2018年6月19日。
现在吵得天翻地覆的就是由美国“Pejoves”基金支付的那个4亿美金。“乌龙事件”，于姓私人助理及于家故事，一个福特孩子妈Jessica O'Connor，今天的波士顿中国城超市，都是在反映究竟是谁不准我方敏花这4亿美金，究竟矛盾是什么。
乌龙事件的主人公是和这家美国基金公司的美国二等亲堂兄弟公司的名字相连，于家故事是和这家美国基金公司从1967年7月-1996年10月或年底所支付的每月一万美金的生活费相连，福特家人及中国城超市是和这家美国基金公司的投资相连，就我所知，还有故事待续。
所有这些矛盾，都造成了我在美国麻州波士顿日常生活中很多的向美国警方的投诉，包括我感觉陌生华人就是敢在非华裔邻居的惊讶目光下直接用钥匙开门进入我的公寓拿东西，还可以笑咪咪的拎了东西堂而皇之的就走。我的家里除了一点非常便宜衣服，就没有值钱东西。邮箱要是有支票寄来，我就担心收不收得到。银行里我也是只敢留一点钱，其他的都是全部现金提出随身携带，据说还被波士顿华裔社区向美国政府举报说我藏钱不报还一定要拿美国穷人补贴，好在我一直也在向美国政府就同一问题也就是我所继承的信托已经向波士顿及麻州支付的我的生活费究竟在哪里我为什么只有金额没法比的穷人补贴而进行投诉。我去华人超市餐馆消费，明明购物的现金是从我口袋里拿出，还有华人在旁吆喝担心我在他们店里偷钱偷东西，就像你们已经在广播里听到的波士顿平价超市的故事。
这一切除了因为中华人民共和国从2015年开始以用真实人物进行文艺演出为名，或编造或剪辑他人故事以实施栽赃谩骂造谣诽谤所造成的严重后果之外，还有就是我2004年继承财产时中国外交部的一些工作人员弄不清法律上的继承只能是继承死人钱，误以为我说我有钱继承是想拿美国那些还活得好好的有钱男人的性交钱，并广为宣传说我所说的这钱那钱其实是美国那些还活得好好的有钱男人不想给的性交钱所造成的美国华裔社区对我方敏老说自己有钱已经退休了不愿去做餐馆工挣生活费用的非常普遍的反感。我已经就这些全部向美国警方投诉了。
至于我的那些发明及智慧产权究竟怎么会事，是一些美国人及华裔从2005年广播剧在美国上线播出可能就开始的一些活动。我听说的是我的第一笔智慧产权收入是在2007年被广播剧宣布后被人提取，其他就像你们在广播剧里已经听到的，一切都在美国司法部门的调查当中。我以前一直以为我的发明是以额外的投资机会来答谢的，所以会由我所继承的信托进行投资，后来听说因为投资人是在太多所以公司付出的其实是现金智慧产权收入后我就报警处理了。
----2018年6月19日。
2：O家困扰的那家公司都已经说清了，你为什么还说自己有钱。
我的回应：那家公司是方敏所继承信托所投资的一家投资基金公司，这家美国基金公司由一家英国基金公司全资拥有，方敏所继承的信托是这家英国基金公司的上游投资机构。这是这家美国基金公司的英国投资基金公司已经说明的。
强调那家美国公司是独立运作公司由英国公司全资拥有，这是在强调现代企业管理学中的有钱可以投资的人和企业的专业管理能力不是同一个范畴的这么一个概念，这样的概念可以有利于公司的发展。我本人目前是MBA在读，很同意这种概念所以不需要反对或者争辩。
----2018年6月19日。
3: 继承信托和兄弟分家产（即继承遗产）的区别是什么。
我的回应：举个例子，大年初一那天，我那活的好好爷爷给了我一个红包压岁钱也就是设了一个信托基金给我，第二天也就是大年初二，我爷爷遇到车祸去世了，他的下一代也就是他的几个儿子要分家产的话，我拿到的压岁钱算不算他留下的遗产？当然不算啦，都已经在前一天给出去的钱啦，哪里还能算成是他自己死后留下的东西啊。
就因为这压岁钱红包是爷爷们在设立时就写好委托书（就是死后的遗嘱）还写得清清楚楚就给我一个人的，所以我所继承的信托基金是我一个人拥有。爷爷们只给我一个人这份压岁钱红包的原因就是因为我是家里2500年来唯一的有和他们一样的胎记掌纹的女孩，我的父亲没有就是因为我父亲虽然也有胎记掌纹，但他是个男孩，和给我压岁钱红包的那些爷爷们性别一样，一点都不稀奇。
我爷爷的弟妹和我父亲的弟妹是我唯一听说过的亲戚，我爷爷的弟妹对我父亲以及我父亲的弟妹对我也确实是亲戚相待是我愿意在我继承后送他们每家一份送给亲戚的礼物的原因。
1：中国政府司法部门所作的说明是：按照国际上的法律继承通行规则，法律继承行为发生所在地的法律是有效继承法律。
2：美国政府司法部门所作的说明是：按照美国法律，我方敏作为中国公民美国居民2004年6月30日在美国领土上的信托继承是合法有效继承。
3：美国基金公司所作的说明是：按照该公司内部法律文件及其上级投资公司说明，我方敏所继承的信托是该公司的上游投资公司，该公司是按其上级投资公司的指示支付我方敏费用。
这是我所知道的按照美国的以及中国的继承法及信托法的说法，如有异议，请出示相关法律事实依据及法律条款。
我向美国警方所投诉的就是为什么依据法律的财产拥有权说法居然可以被想要钱的人以“就是不同意，就是不理解，就是没法明白”为理由就必须让我给钱或者不准我用我自己合法继承的钱。
----2018年6月19日。
Monday, June 18, 2018
06-18-2018 Why the lawful ownership means nothing just because "the deserved money-wanter is announced on the radio"?
06-18-2018 Why the lawful ownership means nothing just because "the deserved money-wanter is announced on the radio"?
Heard this morning's cry and child talk.
My response: I heard this "Jessica O'Connor" is one of the mothers of "the British-broadcasting announced six children", a "Matilda Shimmel" is another one.
Nothing new of this morning's intensified clarification from the agitated leftover-sucker of the crying one.
I have absolutely nothing to do with all above patrons at all. The only reason for this group to have this broadcasting is to deny the fact I do have my biological children who got nothing to do with this group biologically.
I heard this Jessica O'Connor's child is a girl who was born in mid-2010 as well. I don't know how cheap this Jessica O'Connor can be that she needed to compete with a surrogate mother, but I don't need a child to get my living expenses provided. So, I have no such children nor such child biologically associated with this morning's featured any patron.
Basically, this morning's broadcasting is to say I am not allowed to have any biological children or child because this Jessica O'Connor said so. But she may be just a woman who needs a child to get some money, why I need her permission when I am a financially independent wealthy female who should be disgusted by leftovers?
This malicious intention to deny my life to potentially abusively harmful to my biological children through this effort of building up this public denial from the biologically irrelevant group, this maliciousness intention is the reason I called law enforcement's help on this morning's broadcasting.
I already noticed, the technique-in-use is to untie my biological children with me through this public media propaganda and possibly intended to tie their own biological child or children with my inherited wealth through this building up the public impression efforts, to achieve the purpose to abuse me together with my biological children in order to take over my wealth through the public confusion.
This technique-in-use is the reason I accused the organizer intends to murder for money because I would be the one in the way for them to get my money once the public gets so confused who owns what money.
The entire efforts of this broadcasting are to impress the public that lawful ownership of the money means nothing at all, the deserved money-wanters who have the control of this public media are the patrons who should have the money because "it is announced so loudly on the radio".
So, some said, "but you don't look like you have any money in Boston of Massachusetts, and you don't sound like you have any money on the radio as well, why you keep saying you have money and wealth?"
For one, why you think there are so many efforts and necessities are needed to tell the public I have no money when it is obvious that I have no illegal means to access any money? Why it is so impressive that I have been obviously hunted on the radio and in my daily residential living in Boston of Massachusetts?
I say I am wealthy is because I lawfully own what I have announced on this web blog. My announcements about my wealth are not accurate but all lawful according to laws of the United States, the United Kingdom of Britain, the People's Republic of China and etc.
02-01-2018 Happy to be the person that not Stuck-in there
----June 18th, 2018
Regarding the proud "as long as you are fuching, A woman deserves to come to your house to fuch the penis to get your money."
My response: This proud has been since 2004, supported by the People's Republic of China's prostituting gang grouped government and some prominent American rich or associated powerful home-pussy. I was so shocked to learn the rich of being so proud to be able to afford to have some home-pussy.
I say as long as that penis is my leftover and it is from the penis' own willingness, why would I ever care? But I won't hesitate to call 911 to drag both of you out of my any private place or to prevent the penis been rapped, and to send you to the criminal court if you dare to touch my money or to fancy you can get my money via the penis.
I was even asked, "would you invite the women to your house, or introduce any woman to the penis you are fuching for that matter?"
I say being a traditional polygamist, I can certainly introduce if that penis is a leftover to me already and it is from the penis' own willingness to be introduced, but it won't be my trick to throw out a faithful life partner. I am telling you that no woman can be invited to my house for that matter but I will call the house-staff to help out the packing at the first second when the penis is introduced. No compensation would ever be arranged.
----June 18th, 2018
Heard this morning's cry and child talk.
My response: I heard this "Jessica O'Connor" is one of the mothers of "the British-broadcasting announced six children", a "Matilda Shimmel" is another one.
Nothing new of this morning's intensified clarification from the agitated leftover-sucker of the crying one.
I have absolutely nothing to do with all above patrons at all. The only reason for this group to have this broadcasting is to deny the fact I do have my biological children who got nothing to do with this group biologically.
I heard this Jessica O'Connor's child is a girl who was born in mid-2010 as well. I don't know how cheap this Jessica O'Connor can be that she needed to compete with a surrogate mother, but I don't need a child to get my living expenses provided. So, I have no such children nor such child biologically associated with this morning's featured any patron.
Basically, this morning's broadcasting is to say I am not allowed to have any biological children or child because this Jessica O'Connor said so. But she may be just a woman who needs a child to get some money, why I need her permission when I am a financially independent wealthy female who should be disgusted by leftovers?
This malicious intention to deny my life to potentially abusively harmful to my biological children through this effort of building up this public denial from the biologically irrelevant group, this maliciousness intention is the reason I called law enforcement's help on this morning's broadcasting.
I already noticed, the technique-in-use is to untie my biological children with me through this public media propaganda and possibly intended to tie their own biological child or children with my inherited wealth through this building up the public impression efforts, to achieve the purpose to abuse me together with my biological children in order to take over my wealth through the public confusion.
This technique-in-use is the reason I accused the organizer intends to murder for money because I would be the one in the way for them to get my money once the public gets so confused who owns what money.
The entire efforts of this broadcasting are to impress the public that lawful ownership of the money means nothing at all, the deserved money-wanters who have the control of this public media are the patrons who should have the money because "it is announced so loudly on the radio".
So, some said, "but you don't look like you have any money in Boston of Massachusetts, and you don't sound like you have any money on the radio as well, why you keep saying you have money and wealth?"
For one, why you think there are so many efforts and necessities are needed to tell the public I have no money when it is obvious that I have no illegal means to access any money? Why it is so impressive that I have been obviously hunted on the radio and in my daily residential living in Boston of Massachusetts?
I say I am wealthy is because I lawfully own what I have announced on this web blog. My announcements about my wealth are not accurate but all lawful according to laws of the United States, the United Kingdom of Britain, the People's Republic of China and etc.
02-01-2018 Happy to be the person that not Stuck-in there
----June 18th, 2018
Regarding the proud "as long as you are fuching, A woman deserves to come to your house to fuch the penis to get your money."
My response: This proud has been since 2004, supported by the People's Republic of China's prostituting gang grouped government and some prominent American rich or associated powerful home-pussy. I was so shocked to learn the rich of being so proud to be able to afford to have some home-pussy.
I say as long as that penis is my leftover and it is from the penis' own willingness, why would I ever care? But I won't hesitate to call 911 to drag both of you out of my any private place or to prevent the penis been rapped, and to send you to the criminal court if you dare to touch my money or to fancy you can get my money via the penis.
I was even asked, "would you invite the women to your house, or introduce any woman to the penis you are fuching for that matter?"
I say being a traditional polygamist, I can certainly introduce if that penis is a leftover to me already and it is from the penis' own willingness to be introduced, but it won't be my trick to throw out a faithful life partner. I am telling you that no woman can be invited to my house for that matter but I will call the house-staff to help out the packing at the first second when the penis is introduced. No compensation would ever be arranged.
----June 18th, 2018
Sunday, June 17, 2018
06-17-2018 King Lee is the ancient pronunciation-translation of my ancient grandfather's name Jing Li (南唐中主李璟, 916-961AD）
06-17-2018 King Lee is the ancient pronunciation-translation of my ancient grandfather's name Jing Li (南唐中主李璟, 916-961AD）
Heard this morning's talk about "Pejoves" Fund.（中文）
My response: "The investor is not allowed to own" is voiced by the People's Republic of China.
The anger is not related to the modern Business Administration's understanding which recommends investors to be separated with the managerial & administrative power of an investment to enhance the professionalism on business investment's management.
The anger is similar to "you pay for the house, but you are not allowed to own the house nor to occupy the house." (correct me if I am wrong)
The producing team is grouped by the private assistant's related and the "ex-girlfriend" family, which is the hijacker-group of my $9000 (￥9000) living expense providing paid-out from this American "Pejoves" Fund company since I was born in 1967 till I left China in 1996. Those threatening voices are from some actresses and their friend's Middle East romance, etc.
It seems this group doesn't think anything can be wrongful at all for what they did to me and my parents but still trying to get more as if the hijacking is this group's privilege. The reason they were used as the transmitting channel was because the People's Republic of China had severed diplomatic relations since 1949 until 1972 when President Nixon did the State visit to China, there was no money transfering service between the United States and the People's Republic of China. This group of people was not selected by any American nor any American company's employee.
矛盾问题就是，这一群人是我爷爷方智仁当年的于姓私人助理及兄弟姊妹的子女后裔，中国是从1949年开始和美国断交，1972年尼克松访华才恢复外交关系,1967年时没有美国向中国的银行汇款服务。这群人既不是由任何美国人挑选的，也不是由美国公司的任何雇员挑选的。 当年于姓私人助理是这家美国公司支付我的生活费的类似包裹快递的上海中转站，就像现在海外中国城都有的“中国包裹快递”这种，他们就是其中一站，但他们把包裹也就是生活费全部给扣下了，没给我父母，这包裹就是从1967年到1996年的每月9000人民币生活费。现在我成年了，人也在美国了，他们就在中国政府支持下跑美国来，必须要把这家美国公司在美国通过美国“快递公司”（美国财政部）交给我的生活费归他们所有，这不是像拦路抢劫还能是什么呀？
I heard the "thought" is this American "Pejoves" Fund company did not stop the pay-out even after the fact that my parents and I did not receive a penny was known should mean "the granting". This "continuing pay-out" has been the issue between my Trust and the American "Pejoves" Fund company. I can understand the American "Pejoves" Fund company's consideration for my best interest, at least some level if not all, and this is what I express to my entrusting group. For one, I got affluent providing on my food as a child growing-up which wouldn't be easy on my parents' joint-income of￥40-￥50 per month if the paid-out completely stop.
Regarding exactly who I am to this American "Pejoves" Fund company, well, I am the beneficiary-owner of my Trust, my Trust, which was set up for me by Jing Li( or King Lee, 南唐中主李璟) in 961AD or so, has been the up-stream investor-owner of this American "Pejoves" Fund company, as this American "Pejoves" Fund company has already clarified.
King Lee is the ancient spelling translation of 李璟, this ancient spelling translation has been used in Hong Kong as well until 1990. Jing Li is the current standard English spelling translation of the People's Republic of China for 李璟. His son (my grandfather) is the famous Chinese poet "King of the Ci Poem" Yu Li（or Yuk Lee, "词帝” 南唐后主李煜, 937-978AD).
Example: 李锦记公司英文名：Lee Kum Kee Food company, the standard spelling translation for 李锦 would be: Jin Li.
References for Hong Kong common pronunciations:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4b0bb6850101avar.html
https://wenku.baidu.com/view/ccaf99b269dc5022aaea0052.html
----June 17th, 2018
Some ask exactly what has been the issue between me and Chinese National Leaders' true & lifelong love stories.
My response: The same issue as the one I am having with some American big names.
"Why their love affair is my money to pay?" has been my scream this entire time. Why they got a true love who they owe their life-long devotions is the reason that my money should be transferred to their bank accounts without my own willingness.
----June 17th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about "Pejoves" Fund.（中文）
My response: "The investor is not allowed to own" is voiced by the People's Republic of China.
The anger is not related to the modern Business Administration's understanding which recommends investors to be separated with the managerial & administrative power of an investment to enhance the professionalism on business investment's management.
The anger is similar to "you pay for the house, but you are not allowed to own the house nor to occupy the house." (correct me if I am wrong)
The producing team is grouped by the private assistant's related and the "ex-girlfriend" family, which is the hijacker-group of my $9000 (￥9000) living expense providing paid-out from this American "Pejoves" Fund company since I was born in 1967 till I left China in 1996. Those threatening voices are from some actresses and their friend's Middle East romance, etc.
It seems this group doesn't think anything can be wrongful at all for what they did to me and my parents but still trying to get more as if the hijacking is this group's privilege. The reason they were used as the transmitting channel was because the People's Republic of China had severed diplomatic relations since 1949 until 1972 when President Nixon did the State visit to China, there was no money transfering service between the United States and the People's Republic of China. This group of people was not selected by any American nor any American company's employee.
矛盾问题就是，这一群人是我爷爷方智仁当年的于姓私人助理及兄弟姊妹的子女后裔，中国是从1949年开始和美国断交，1972年尼克松访华才恢复外交关系,1967年时没有美国向中国的银行汇款服务。这群人既不是由任何美国人挑选的，也不是由美国公司的任何雇员挑选的。 当年于姓私人助理是这家美国公司支付我的生活费的类似包裹快递的上海中转站，就像现在海外中国城都有的“中国包裹快递”这种，他们就是其中一站，但他们把包裹也就是生活费全部给扣下了，没给我父母，这包裹就是从1967年到1996年的每月9000人民币生活费。现在我成年了，人也在美国了，他们就在中国政府支持下跑美国来，必须要把这家美国公司在美国通过美国“快递公司”（美国财政部）交给我的生活费归他们所有，这不是像拦路抢劫还能是什么呀？
I heard the "thought" is this American "Pejoves" Fund company did not stop the pay-out even after the fact that my parents and I did not receive a penny was known should mean "the granting". This "continuing pay-out" has been the issue between my Trust and the American "Pejoves" Fund company. I can understand the American "Pejoves" Fund company's consideration for my best interest, at least some level if not all, and this is what I express to my entrusting group. For one, I got affluent providing on my food as a child growing-up which wouldn't be easy on my parents' joint-income of￥40-￥50 per month if the paid-out completely stop.
Regarding exactly who I am to this American "Pejoves" Fund company, well, I am the beneficiary-owner of my Trust, my Trust, which was set up for me by Jing Li( or King Lee, 南唐中主李璟) in 961AD or so, has been the up-stream investor-owner of this American "Pejoves" Fund company, as this American "Pejoves" Fund company has already clarified.
King Lee is the ancient spelling translation of 李璟, this ancient spelling translation has been used in Hong Kong as well until 1990. Jing Li is the current standard English spelling translation of the People's Republic of China for 李璟. His son (my grandfather) is the famous Chinese poet "King of the Ci Poem" Yu Li（or Yuk Lee, "词帝” 南唐后主李煜, 937-978AD).
Example: 李锦记公司英文名：Lee Kum Kee Food company, the standard spelling translation for 李锦 would be: Jin Li.
References for Hong Kong common pronunciations:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4b0bb6850101avar.html
https://wenku.baidu.com/view/ccaf99b269dc5022aaea0052.html
----June 17th, 2018
Some ask exactly what has been the issue between me and Chinese National Leaders' true & lifelong love stories.
My response: The same issue as the one I am having with some American big names.
"Why their love affair is my money to pay?" has been my scream this entire time. Why they got a true love who they owe their life-long devotions is the reason that my money should be transferred to their bank accounts without my own willingness.
----June 17th, 2018
Saturday, June 16, 2018
06-16-2018 就我的信托继承，我给方家后人和方家亲戚的一份说明
06-16-2018 就我的信托继承，我给方家后人和方家亲戚的一份说明
Heard this morning's talk about sexual intercourse money.
My response: Well, this morning's "objecting" group are, not were but have been, helping hands of what they are objecting, so, the "objecting" tones are very amicable.
----June 16th, 2018
听说了方家后人对于我没有通知他们我继承了信托很是愤怒。
我的回应：因为我当时有脑伤失意症状，在2004年6月30日及7月1日会议上也都有谈到，所以我会议结束后完全没有任何会议记忆，这也是我2015年开始查寻“我2004年究竟继承的是什么”查寻的很苦的原因。我在2015年我有现金拨打国际长途电话后就已经通知了南京方面。
按照法律，我是信托的唯一受益人而非信托的受委托人，作为信托唯一受益人的我没有任何法律上的责任义务通知其他任何人。我通知南京方面我在查询只是出于亲情，而非亏欠。我当时如果有上海亲戚的通联方式，我也会出于亲情通知他们。
我的信托律师从来不是方家共用的律师，我没有任何法律上的责任义务也没有任何意愿将我的律师包括信托律师作为方家的公用律师。
我已经将我所知道的我如何继承信托的一些信息公布在此博客，也很早就已经将此博客地址通知南京方面，我能通知上海亲戚的也就只有这个博客地址。我目前没有任何比此播客已经公布的内容更具体的信息，我今后也没有任何意愿谈论我的私人财务，所以我也不会有比这博客已经公布的内容更多的信息通知上海亲戚。如果我能有上海亲戚的通联，我愿意告知他们此博客地址。我的这个博客其实就是我的查询日记。
若有任何怀疑我的律师将方家任何人的可继承财产非法归我所有，这其实是在指控这些律师以我名义偷窃方家其他人的钱财只是没有转入这些律师他们自己的银行而已。如果这是真实怀疑及指控，这就已经是针对这些律师的刑事指控，应该向司法公安机关举报刑事贪污偷窃案件，而非认为我是在授权只愿意通过司法公安机关给钱。司法公安机关是捍卫法治社会司法公平正义的政府机构，不是文娱演出单位，更非私人律师或者财经服务公司。
民事法庭是针对财产所有权解决纠纷的地方，按照法律要求就财产的拥有权必须给个符合法律的说法的地方，报警是就财产被非法抢夺而寻求执法人员协助的方式。
我方敏所继承钱财被一些人在没有任何法律依据可以上民事法庭打财产纠纷官司的情况下， 莫名其妙就被要求我方敏必须就我所继承钱财给这些人一个非法律的说法，而且不用给钱方式解决这个矛盾就是不行，是我方敏就此报警的原因。我方敏报警就是在寻求执法人员协助保护我方敏的合法财产。
至于上海亲戚投诉他们的父亲方智仁的信托遗嘱看不到，我本人认为上海亲戚没有任何需要看方智仁的这份遗嘱。方智仁替我设立的信托是在1948年设立时就是设立成为法人机构，所以有当时的法人机构登记记录在香港政府。方智仁设立该信托时，方智仁的所有子女都已经出生，方智仁设立该信托时所立下的委托书在他去世后以后就成为方智仁就这份信托所立下的遗嘱。方智仁是1965年去世，方智仁去世前也已经对他的所有子女做了1965年的亲笔临终交代及财产安排。方智仁从1948年该信托设立后到他1965年去世就从未更改他本人的信托意愿。我方敏认为在方智仁所有子女都已经有了方智仁1965年所立下的遗嘱的情况下，方智仁1948年就信托所立下的遗嘱是方智仁给我方敏的私人信件，我方敏不愿意此信件被任何人查询。
至于有人质疑方智仁哪里来的这么多钱，这是合法私人钱财，多少都不管任何人的事。方智仁，方智仁的父亲和爷爷三代都是当时的中华民国政府教育部的捐款大户，三代所捐款项总额是当时的中华民国政府设立中央大学系统全部所需金额的90%左右。当时因为有很多方姓人士捐款，所以有很多说法。方智仁的父亲是方智仁爷爷的胎记掌纹及财产继承人，方智仁父子就捐款金额也非常低调，但台湾的中华民国政府教育部档案里应该有正确的信息。
方智仁父亲的所有子女都是我曾祖母所出，方智仁的所有子女都是我祖母所出是方智仁的父亲这支从方智仁这一代才开始有亲戚走动的原因，我方敏从未听说方智仁的各代爷爷们所育的其他子女， 我方敏也从未和方智仁的各代爷爷们所育的其他子女有过任何往来。
----2018年6月16日。
Heard this morning's talk about sexual intercourse money.
My response: Well, this morning's "objecting" group are, not were but have been, helping hands of what they are objecting, so, the "objecting" tones are very amicable.
----June 16th, 2018
听说了方家后人对于我没有通知他们我继承了信托很是愤怒。
我的回应：因为我当时有脑伤失意症状，在2004年6月30日及7月1日会议上也都有谈到，所以我会议结束后完全没有任何会议记忆，这也是我2015年开始查寻“我2004年究竟继承的是什么”查寻的很苦的原因。我在2015年我有现金拨打国际长途电话后就已经通知了南京方面。
按照法律，我是信托的唯一受益人而非信托的受委托人，作为信托唯一受益人的我没有任何法律上的责任义务通知其他任何人。我通知南京方面我在查询只是出于亲情，而非亏欠。我当时如果有上海亲戚的通联方式，我也会出于亲情通知他们。
我的信托律师从来不是方家共用的律师，我没有任何法律上的责任义务也没有任何意愿将我的律师包括信托律师作为方家的公用律师。
我已经将我所知道的我如何继承信托的一些信息公布在此博客，也很早就已经将此博客地址通知南京方面，我能通知上海亲戚的也就只有这个博客地址。我目前没有任何比此播客已经公布的内容更具体的信息，我今后也没有任何意愿谈论我的私人财务，所以我也不会有比这博客已经公布的内容更多的信息通知上海亲戚。如果我能有上海亲戚的通联，我愿意告知他们此博客地址。我的这个博客其实就是我的查询日记。
若有任何怀疑我的律师将方家任何人的可继承财产非法归我所有，这其实是在指控这些律师以我名义偷窃方家其他人的钱财只是没有转入这些律师他们自己的银行而已。如果这是真实怀疑及指控，这就已经是针对这些律师的刑事指控，应该向司法公安机关举报刑事贪污偷窃案件，而非认为我是在授权只愿意通过司法公安机关给钱。司法公安机关是捍卫法治社会司法公平正义的政府机构，不是文娱演出单位，更非私人律师或者财经服务公司。
民事法庭是针对财产所有权解决纠纷的地方，按照法律要求就财产的拥有权必须给个符合法律的说法的地方，报警是就财产被非法抢夺而寻求执法人员协助的方式。
我方敏所继承钱财被一些人在没有任何法律依据可以上民事法庭打财产纠纷官司的情况下， 莫名其妙就被要求我方敏必须就我所继承钱财给这些人一个非法律的说法，而且不用给钱方式解决这个矛盾就是不行，是我方敏就此报警的原因。我方敏报警就是在寻求执法人员协助保护我方敏的合法财产。
至于上海亲戚投诉他们的父亲方智仁的信托遗嘱看不到，我本人认为上海亲戚没有任何需要看方智仁的这份遗嘱。方智仁替我设立的信托是在1948年设立时就是设立成为法人机构，所以有当时的法人机构登记记录在香港政府。方智仁设立该信托时，方智仁的所有子女都已经出生，方智仁设立该信托时所立下的委托书在他去世后以后就成为方智仁就这份信托所立下的遗嘱。方智仁是1965年去世，方智仁去世前也已经对他的所有子女做了1965年的亲笔临终交代及财产安排。方智仁从1948年该信托设立后到他1965年去世就从未更改他本人的信托意愿。我方敏认为在方智仁所有子女都已经有了方智仁1965年所立下的遗嘱的情况下，方智仁1948年就信托所立下的遗嘱是方智仁给我方敏的私人信件，我方敏不愿意此信件被任何人查询。
至于有人质疑方智仁哪里来的这么多钱，这是合法私人钱财，多少都不管任何人的事。方智仁，方智仁的父亲和爷爷三代都是当时的中华民国政府教育部的捐款大户，三代所捐款项总额是当时的中华民国政府设立中央大学系统全部所需金额的90%左右。当时因为有很多方姓人士捐款，所以有很多说法。方智仁的父亲是方智仁爷爷的胎记掌纹及财产继承人，方智仁父子就捐款金额也非常低调，但台湾的中华民国政府教育部档案里应该有正确的信息。
方智仁父亲的所有子女都是我曾祖母所出，方智仁的所有子女都是我祖母所出是方智仁的父亲这支从方智仁这一代才开始有亲戚走动的原因，我方敏从未听说方智仁的各代爷爷们所育的其他子女， 我方敏也从未和方智仁的各代爷爷们所育的其他子女有过任何往来。
----2018年6月16日。
Friday, June 15, 2018
06-15-2018 Why a so-so rich deserve to search a much richer? For what they already have self-produced for their own self-enjoyment?
06-15-2018 Why a so-so rich deserve to search a much richer? For what they already have self-produced for their own self-enjoyment?
Heard this morning's shocking broadcasting.
My response: The search-threat announcer is a common salary rich in reality, not even a hedge fund manager rich nor any superior rich to be this loud.
This entire time, it seems a lot of criminal activities defined by the U.S. criminal laws as well as the Chinese criminal laws have been promoted on this radio program as privileges and been constantly called upon "to make it happen" in the name of "practicing to be a politician".
I assemble some examples I have complained about, please correct me if I am wrong:
Examples:
1: Money's lawful ownership is publicly challenged by the willingness to own the money which resulted in actual illegal money ownership transfer.
2: Intellectual Income is challenged to be re-categorized as sexual-intercourse income which also resulted in actual illegal money ownership transfer.
3: Reality broadcasting or news reports is challenged to be re-defined as "Announce the wish to make it a Reality" through promotion after each broadcasting which resulted in illegal hate-promoting and illegal harassment-organizing, I heard it is intended to achieve illegal property(valuables) ownership transfer.
4: "Politician or Politician-to-be" is not in-office to serve the people but to practice superior privileges in front of all laws, and to enjoy sex & money as well as privileged biological reproduction, and to expect to be financially handsomely supported by tax-collected from the people?
----June 15th, 2018
In China, only one major group that is known for politicians' training organization: Chinese Communism Youth Party. I heard tons of people that have some stories on this blog are currently professionally associated with this Chinese Communism Youth party.
Examples:
"First-born daughter", "Ex-girl friend's" family, Private assistant's family, 2004's prominent Chinese males' and their possible true loves, etc. A lot of them have demanded money publicly on this radio program without any legal ground, some resulted in actual illegal money ownership transfer.
----June 15th, 2018
Heard this morning's shocking broadcasting.
My response: The search-threat announcer is a common salary rich in reality, not even a hedge fund manager rich nor any superior rich to be this loud.
This entire time, it seems a lot of criminal activities defined by the U.S. criminal laws as well as the Chinese criminal laws have been promoted on this radio program as privileges and been constantly called upon "to make it happen" in the name of "practicing to be a politician".
I assemble some examples I have complained about, please correct me if I am wrong:
Examples:
1: Money's lawful ownership is publicly challenged by the willingness to own the money which resulted in actual illegal money ownership transfer.
2: Intellectual Income is challenged to be re-categorized as sexual-intercourse income which also resulted in actual illegal money ownership transfer.
3: Reality broadcasting or news reports is challenged to be re-defined as "Announce the wish to make it a Reality" through promotion after each broadcasting which resulted in illegal hate-promoting and illegal harassment-organizing, I heard it is intended to achieve illegal property(valuables) ownership transfer.
4: "Politician or Politician-to-be" is not in-office to serve the people but to practice superior privileges in front of all laws, and to enjoy sex & money as well as privileged biological reproduction, and to expect to be financially handsomely supported by tax-collected from the people?
----June 15th, 2018
In China, only one major group that is known for politicians' training organization: Chinese Communism Youth Party. I heard tons of people that have some stories on this blog are currently professionally associated with this Chinese Communism Youth party.
Examples:
"First-born daughter", "Ex-girl friend's" family, Private assistant's family, 2004's prominent Chinese males' and their possible true loves, etc. A lot of them have demanded money publicly on this radio program without any legal ground, some resulted in actual illegal money ownership transfer.
----June 15th, 2018
Thursday, June 14, 2018
06-14-2018 Happy Birthday
06-14-2018 Happy Birthday
Happy birthday to my children, my darling, my sweethearts,
You are biological, you are my own blood,
You are biologically my blood no matter what others say,
You are mine, you are mine,
You are mine no matter what others say.
----from mother
Happy birthday to my children, my darling, my sweethearts,
You are biological, you are my own blood,
You are biologically my blood no matter what others say,
You are mine, you are mine,
You are mine no matter what others say.
----from mother
Wednesday, June 13, 2018
06-13-2018 Do I have money in the United States? Yes, of course, I Do.
06-13-2018 Do I have money in the United States? Yes, of course, I Do.
Heard the confusion if I indeed came from a rich Chinese family to have money.
My response: Well, I append some information here.
This grandfather Fang, Zhiren（方智仁）is in the U.S. government's records as part of my immigration document. My father's name is Fang, Wenhai(方文海). This Trust should be listed in Hong Kong's Registry. I do have money in the United States which are provided by some of my up-stream grandfathers' Trusts.
Heard the confusion if I indeed came from a rich Chinese family to have money.
My response: Well, I append some information here.
This grandfather Fang, Zhiren（方智仁）is in the U.S. government's records as part of my immigration document. My father's name is Fang, Wenhai(方文海). This Trust should be listed in Hong Kong's Registry. I do have money in the United States which are provided by some of my up-stream grandfathers' Trusts.
The Reference about my Hong Kong Trust that set up for me in 1948.
My grandfather Fang, Zhiren（方智仁）passed away in 1965. His name is in my U.S. immigration record as my birth grandfather who fathered my birth father Fang, Wenhai(方文海）.
This Hong Kong Trust my grandfather set up for me has been the original $15Million US Dollar size Trust-Investor to the current 香港长江实业(集团)有限公司(Hong Kong's Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited) since 1949 or so.
This Hong Kong Trust was set up by 5 Million Silver Dollar in 1948, the exchange rate in 1948 was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 US Dollars. This $15Million US dollar($150,000,000) was in this Hong Kong Trust's registry record and has been in its business investing since 1948.
*I heard the $15Million U.S. dollar($15,000,000) in 1948 was the amount of the famous afterwar thrift budget-approved in the year of 1948 for the entire U.S. Military.
*I heard the $15Million U.S. dollar($15,000,000) in 1948 was the amount of the famous afterwar thrift budget-approved in the year of 1948 for the entire U.S. Military.
I heard there is confusion about this Hong Kong Trust's registry data.
1: it was updated in 1971.
My response: This is invalid update if there is such update. The reason is the settler Fang, Zhiren (方智仁）passed away in 1965 and no inheriting yet. I am the sole beneficiary person of this Trust.
2: There is another update in 2007.
My response: I inherited in 2004, this 2007 update may reflect my inheriting.
3: If that is my grandfather's younger brother or some other person's money.
My response: This is a 5 Million Siver dollar($15,000,000 U.S dollar) Trust on the entrusting date of 1948, my grandfather's younger brother's family has been stating he had sent 10,000 Silver Dollar($30,000 US dollar) to HongKong in 1948.
The two amounts($15,000,000 vs $30,000) are no comparison at all to be confused. This is my money because I am the sole beneficiary person according to the will of Fang, Zhiren（方智仁) and I inherited it on June 30th of 2004.
4: The confusion of the $500Million transfer from this Trust to the U.S in 2004-2007.
My response:
The check was initially written by an account payable/receivable specialist (a Book Keeper) from an operating account of this Trust's business investment instead of the capital account of this Trust's in the business investment, and associated afterward had caused confusion if this $500Million U.S dollar transfer is legal. This $500Million U.S. dollar transfer was never some money laundry scheme, the account payable/receivable specialist is a bookkeeper instead of an accountant, and this $500Million U.S. dollar written-check was adjusted between bank accounts, not the accounting accounts.
----June 13th, 2018
Tuesday, June 12, 2018
06-12-2018 Wives frustration presented in this featured story of "who is who, what is what"
06-12-2018 Wives frustration presented in this featured story of "who is who, what is what"
Heard yesterday's episode was reacted as ugliest arrogant from the audience.
My response: The problem was because this episode did not introduce the background of how this two irrelated groups could possibly have this kind of talk at all.
It is the similar issue to another featured story almost a year ago regarding how a foreign female who insisted on to have a child with an American rich could actually have the opportunities to approach to personally demand to have sexual intercourse to be conducted just because she wants to have a rich American's child.
How this two irrelated group or persons, who don't share any office space or any social event to meet at all, can be arranged to sit down have this "catch the moment and catch the lifetime opportunity" to approach to personally demand money or sexual intercourse is what has been missing in the radio program.
----June 12th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "who is who, what is what".
My response: I heard it takes the entire bar's eye-witnesses to say that was an innocent comforting hug to the crying one to comfort the agitated wife. I heard the severe frustration was that it was a hug from an apparently very handsomely young and attractive but truly senior-already man to an apparently very young and pretty but truly in my late-thirties girly cry.
I was lucky I met two cousins from the same great family in just two days, and I was not lucky because we all got some youth-GENE from our mothers that made me so frustrated for all these females' frustration all these times.
I heard the frustration I felt with the audience of this radio program has been from wives of the cousins who either got this youth GENE or didn't. The frustration range from the anger why the same "aged" cousins can be obviously "so attractively" young and handsome to the frustration of the others that facing the obvious strong competition because of this "so attractive".
By the way, the Hong Kong Trust I inherited from my own birth grandfather (my father's father) is actually never a shabby on at all as a lot of people have impressed from my blog.
This Hong Kong Trust has been the original $15Million US Dollar Trust-Investor to the current 香港长江实业(集团)有限公司(Hong Kong's Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited) since 1949 or so.
This Hong Kong Trust was set up by 5 Million Silver Dollar in 1948 as I published before, the exchange rate in 1948 that I did not publish was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 US Dollars, this $15Million US dollar was in this This Hong Kong Trust's registry record and has been in its business investing since 1948.
My grandfather had left himself about $450,000 U.S. dollar (150,000Silver Dollar) when he set up this Hong Kong Trust, he had been miserable because of his decision to keep his wealth in the Silver Dollar instead of in the U.S. dollar. The Silver Dollar's collecting rate from the People's Republic of China in 1949-1950 was fixed to 1 Silver Dollar = ￥1 Chinese RMB, and the exchange rate had been fixed to ￥1 Chinese RMB = $1 US Dollar since 1949 till 1980 or so.
My grandfather's wealth shrank to 1/3 of what he had planned for himself caused my great-grandmother a lot of tears to watch her son doing the living expenses calculation. Her own wealth, which was the similar size of what my grandfather had at that time, was in the same situation but she only needed to support herself and my father at that time. I heard her younger son was in similar financial stress because he had hand-in the majority of his wealth to the Chinese Communist Party as the Party-member Fee. My great grandmother did not give a penny to my father whom she had raised since birth but all to her own born three children (2 sons and 1 daughter).
Well, this Hong Kong Trust was set up for me by the youngest generation grandfather of mine so I would assume the impression that this Trust is the most shabby gift I have received won't be an issue to all those grandfathers of mine who have blessed me, well, they were father & grandfathers to my grandfather as well to expect my grandfather to behave respectfully not to complain about this shabby gift impression. So, I just take it easy.
----June 12th, 2018
Heard yesterday's episode was reacted as ugliest arrogant from the audience.
My response: The problem was because this episode did not introduce the background of how this two irrelated groups could possibly have this kind of talk at all.
It is the similar issue to another featured story almost a year ago regarding how a foreign female who insisted on to have a child with an American rich could actually have the opportunities to approach to personally demand to have sexual intercourse to be conducted just because she wants to have a rich American's child.
How this two irrelated group or persons, who don't share any office space or any social event to meet at all, can be arranged to sit down have this "catch the moment and catch the lifetime opportunity" to approach to personally demand money or sexual intercourse is what has been missing in the radio program.
----June 12th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "who is who, what is what".
My response: I heard it takes the entire bar's eye-witnesses to say that was an innocent comforting hug to the crying one to comfort the agitated wife. I heard the severe frustration was that it was a hug from an apparently very handsomely young and attractive but truly senior-already man to an apparently very young and pretty but truly in my late-thirties girly cry.
I was lucky I met two cousins from the same great family in just two days, and I was not lucky because we all got some youth-GENE from our mothers that made me so frustrated for all these females' frustration all these times.
I heard the frustration I felt with the audience of this radio program has been from wives of the cousins who either got this youth GENE or didn't. The frustration range from the anger why the same "aged" cousins can be obviously "so attractively" young and handsome to the frustration of the others that facing the obvious strong competition because of this "so attractive".
By the way, the Hong Kong Trust I inherited from my own birth grandfather (my father's father) is actually never a shabby on at all as a lot of people have impressed from my blog.
This Hong Kong Trust has been the original $15Million US Dollar Trust-Investor to the current 香港长江实业(集团)有限公司(Hong Kong's Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited) since 1949 or so.
This Hong Kong Trust was set up by 5 Million Silver Dollar in 1948 as I published before, the exchange rate in 1948 that I did not publish was 1 Silver Dollar = $3 US Dollars, this $15Million US dollar was in this This Hong Kong Trust's registry record and has been in its business investing since 1948.
My grandfather had left himself about $450,000 U.S. dollar (150,000Silver Dollar) when he set up this Hong Kong Trust, he had been miserable because of his decision to keep his wealth in the Silver Dollar instead of in the U.S. dollar. The Silver Dollar's collecting rate from the People's Republic of China in 1949-1950 was fixed to 1 Silver Dollar = ￥1 Chinese RMB, and the exchange rate had been fixed to ￥1 Chinese RMB = $1 US Dollar since 1949 till 1980 or so.
My grandfather's wealth shrank to 1/3 of what he had planned for himself caused my great-grandmother a lot of tears to watch her son doing the living expenses calculation. Her own wealth, which was the similar size of what my grandfather had at that time, was in the same situation but she only needed to support herself and my father at that time. I heard her younger son was in similar financial stress because he had hand-in the majority of his wealth to the Chinese Communist Party as the Party-member Fee. My great grandmother did not give a penny to my father whom she had raised since birth but all to her own born three children (2 sons and 1 daughter).
Well, this Hong Kong Trust was set up for me by the youngest generation grandfather of mine so I would assume the impression that this Trust is the most shabby gift I have received won't be an issue to all those grandfathers of mine who have blessed me, well, they were father & grandfathers to my grandfather as well to expect my grandfather to behave respectfully not to complain about this shabby gift impression. So, I just take it easy.
----June 12th, 2018
Monday, June 11, 2018
06-11-2018 This morning's featured stories of Nanjing, China (南京的人和事）
06-11-2018 This morning's featured stories of Nanjing, China (南京的人和事）
I am happy to hear my father's news and I can't wait to see my father in person.
----June 11th, 2018
Some said why not give out random money to those who are demanding as "donations".
My response: Well, when the helpful-amount is limited, never unlimited of course, why I have to give a penny to those who shits me all over, wish me evil and being abusive to my beloved? Why I have to thrift a penny from what I can help to those who have been so nice to me and taking care of my beloved? I refuse to consider any donation to those who threaten me, harm me and being evil to me or my beloved.
Line-up marriage or marriage freedom, both are none of my business nor my concern, by LAWS.
I reject any financial demanding related to this line-up marriage or marriage freedom story.
----June 11th, 2018
我很开心听到了我父亲的消息，期盼着和他重逢。
----2018年6月11日。
有人说你有钱为什么就不能扔几个子给那些想要钱的。
我的回应：这么说吧，能帮人的钱总是有限的，从来都不是无限量的，那我为什么要给那些痛骂我诅咒我就怕我不死或者就要虐待我所爱一切的那些人一分一厘我的钱？我什么要从那些对我好又照顾着我所爱一切的那些人那里节省一分一厘我那能帮人的钱？我拒绝考虑捐款给那些威胁我，伤害我以及对我很不好之类的人。
串婚也好，婚姻自由也好，今天早上提到的几千公里之外的南京婚姻事，按照法律来说，统统都不关我的事，我不在乎也不应该在乎。
我拒绝基于这个串婚或者婚姻自由的故事所对我提出的任何财务要求。
----2018年6月11日。
05-23-2018 请出示够资格向我索要钱财的法律条款及事实依据
没有任何关联是我方敏没有亏欠你任何人情债金钱债的最好证据，
也就是说作为美国公民，
对于坚持以编造故事或者将他人故事予以剪辑的手段对我方敏栽赃造
任何够资格在大众广播频道上扯着嗓门向我要钱的人：
1：
2：
3：
4： 请出示我方敏必须按照中国法律和美国法律必须归还本应由你及你的
5：请注意，按照中国法律和美国法律对财产继承的定义，继承从被
I am happy to hear my father's news and I can't wait to see my father in person.
----June 11th, 2018
Some said why not give out random money to those who are demanding as "donations".
My response: Well, when the helpful-amount is limited, never unlimited of course, why I have to give a penny to those who shits me all over, wish me evil and being abusive to my beloved? Why I have to thrift a penny from what I can help to those who have been so nice to me and taking care of my beloved? I refuse to consider any donation to those who threaten me, harm me and being evil to me or my beloved.
Line-up marriage or marriage freedom, both are none of my business nor my concern, by LAWS.
I reject any financial demanding related to this line-up marriage or marriage freedom story.
----June 11th, 2018
我很开心听到了我父亲的消息，期盼着和他重逢。
----2018年6月11日。
有人说你有钱为什么就不能扔几个子给那些想要钱的。
我的回应：这么说吧，能帮人的钱总是有限的，从来都不是无限量的，那我为什么要给那些痛骂我诅咒我就怕我不死或者就要虐待我所爱一切的那些人一分一厘我的钱？我什么要从那些对我好又照顾着我所爱一切的那些人那里节省一分一厘我那能帮人的钱？我拒绝考虑捐款给那些威胁我，伤害我以及对我很不好之类的人。
串婚也好，婚姻自由也好，今天早上提到的几千公里之外的南京婚姻事，按照法律来说，统统都不关我的事，我不在乎也不应该在乎。
我拒绝基于这个串婚或者婚姻自由的故事所对我提出的任何财务要求。
----2018年6月11日。
05-23-2018 请出示够资格向我索要钱财的法律条款及事实依据
没有任何关联是我方敏没有亏欠你任何人情债金钱债的最好证据，
也就是说作为美国公民，
对于坚持以编造故事或者将他人故事予以剪辑的手段对我方敏栽赃造
任何够资格在大众广播频道上扯着嗓门向我要钱的人：
1：
2：
3：
4： 请出示我方敏必须按照中国法律和美国法律必须归还本应由你及你的
5：请注意，按照中国法律和美国法律对财产继承的定义，继承从被
6：我是从2004年6月30日开始自称继承了钱财，
6： 请回答为何不上民事诉讼法庭解决所有这些民事法庭上就可以依据法
----2018年5月23日。
6： 请回答为何不上民事诉讼法庭解决所有这些民事法庭上就可以依据法
----2018年5月23日。
Sunday, June 10, 2018
06-10-2018 我投诉中国政府的信件原文
06-10-2018 我投诉中国政府的信件原文
05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，
05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，
你好：
我方敏从未反对中国共产党对中国960万平方公里土地的管理和统
我方敏反对中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以他们共同利
我方敏从未在乎中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以及其他
我方敏所投诉的一直就是我方敏在作为中国公民在海外生活期间以及
我方敏坚决反对阻碍中华人民共和国法制建设的任何行为， 我方敏坚决拒绝特意向违反中华人民共和国法律的人士提供任何财务
此致
方敏
2018年5月9日。
----------------------------
你好：
下附我方敏对中国政府投诉的解释。此致
谢谢
方敏
06-09-2018 The difference between government federal reserve and individual private wealth (政府国库和一个公民私有财产之间的区别）
My anger has been it is never my intention to promote myself to the government level, and I refuse my private wealth to be abused in the name of politics.
My understanding:
To improve people's lives are the sworn responsibilities of those who are devoted to serve the people, never any individual person's voluntary power to invade any individual citizen's private life;
What the best interest of the people might be is often the debates in the government and the Congress, never any individual citizen's lawful private wealth's ownership;
A lawful private wealth is part of an individual citizen's life, never the funding capitals to better the common of the nation, nor any group of any privileged.
My understanding:
To improve people's lives are the sworn responsibilities of those who are devoted to serve the people, never any individual person's voluntary power to invade any individual citizen's private life;
What the best interest of the people might be is often the debates in the government and the Congress, never any individual citizen's lawful private wealth's ownership;
A lawful private wealth is part of an individual citizen's life, never the funding capitals to better the common of the nation, nor any group of any privileged.
----June 9th, 2018
我一直以来的愤怒就是从来就不是我自己想把自己拔高到政府的地位
我个人认为，如果中华人民共和国是有政府管理的，
任何中国公民要求改善其私有财产状况的问题从来都应该是中国政府
*我是2015年6月宣誓成为美国公民。
----2018年6月9日。
----------------------------
你好：
更多一些解释。
此致
谢谢
方敏
没有任何关联是我方敏没有亏欠你任何人情债金钱债的最好证据，
也就是说作为美国公民，
对于坚持以编造故事或者将他人故事予以剪辑的手段对我方敏栽赃造
任何够资格在大众广播频道上扯着嗓门向我要钱的人：
1：
2：
3：
4： 请出示我方敏必须按照中国法律和美国法律必须归还本应由你及你的
5：请注意，按照中国法律和美国法律对财产继承的定义，继承从被
6：我是从2004年6月30日开始自称继承了钱财，
6： 请回答为何不上民事诉讼法庭解决所有这些民事法庭上就可以依据法
----2018年5月23日。
6： 请回答为何不上民事诉讼法庭解决所有这些民事法庭上就可以依据法
----2018年5月23日。
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)