Heard this morning's question of "why she can't be a Mistress".
My response: The tone and the question normally would be expected from a special group of people called dowagers. A dowager is a dignified senior female who has a title or properties derived from her late husband.(https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dowager).
The tone would be more haughty if a senior female has both a title and properties from the late husband, but normally won't address to a same-kind who won't tolerate a bit but respond fiercely by all means. A same-kind normally does have a lot of means to respond fiercely, right?
The following is my example response which is a very common one that can be responded immediately and publicly right to the faces of those who dare to ask this question and as my return of those "bathroom" radio program promotions organized by the couple. A very mild response indeed.
This question "why can't she be a Mistress" is definitely ridiculous from a Mistress only female with the seeder of her child still alive, and address to a well-known polygamist heiress. This haughty question, rumored, is from a Jessica P, the announced mother of James Rockefeller's child (David Petraeus' child). No wonder the saying is "His profession is in uniform which should stand for no-education already." And I add here that I can tolerate that person this much for the sake that his child does not have any title can inherit from him. A title does imply some class of taste, including the taste of choosing who can seed to produce an heir, right?
To those "bathroom" promotions that organized just to tell everyone that I am a female David Petraeus never intended to fuck with, I really have to say I do not know how this David Petraeus addressed his own birthmother to differentiate the category?
----Dec. 24th, 2017
What is the difference between a Mistress, a Dowager and an Heiress?
My response:
The tone would be more haughty if a senior female has both a title and properties from the late husband, but normally won't address to a same-kind who won't tolerate a bit but respond fiercely by all means. A same-kind normally does have a lot of means to respond fiercely, right?
The following is my example response which is a very common one that can be responded immediately and publicly right to the faces of those who dare to ask this question and as my return of those "bathroom" radio program promotions organized by the couple. A very mild response indeed.
This question "why can't she be a Mistress" is definitely ridiculous from a Mistress only female with the seeder of her child still alive, and address to a well-known polygamist heiress. This haughty question, rumored, is from a Jessica P, the announced mother of James Rockefeller's child (David Petraeus' child). No wonder the saying is "His profession is in uniform which should stand for no-education already." And I add here that I can tolerate that person this much for the sake that his child does not have any title can inherit from him. A title does imply some class of taste, including the taste of choosing who can seed to produce an heir, right?
To those "bathroom" promotions that organized just to tell everyone that I am a female David Petraeus never intended to fuck with, I really have to say I do not know how this David Petraeus addressed his own birthmother to differentiate the category?
What is the difference between a Mistress, a Dowager and an Heiress?
My response:
An heiress is a female who has who has inherited a title or properties from her birth family, not necessarily from the birth parents if the properties or title is from birth grandparent directly, but has to be the heiress of the birth parent from the side she inherited her title or properties from.
If a dowager is also an heiress of her own maiden family, the dowager has the saying of her owns plus what she got from her late husband.
A dowager is the head of her late husband's household but has no saying of her own-born inherited heir son, and her own-born inherited heir son has no saying of her, the same. An heiress is the head of her own house that having sayings of all her own-born blood together with the entire house.
If a dowager is also an heiress of her own maiden family, the dowager has the saying of her owns plus what she got from her late husband.
A dowager is the head of her late husband's household but has no saying of her own-born inherited heir son, and her own-born inherited heir son has no saying of her, the same. An heiress is the head of her own house that having sayings of all her own-born blood together with the entire house.
I am the heir(heiress) of my own birthfather according to my family's ancient birthmark heir rule, but my inherited wealth and my titles are from my birth grandfathers directly.
I often address myself an heir to my grandfathers because I was brought up as a boy. I am an heiress of an almost 2000-years-long history polygamist family that has the male polygamist's privilege in my romance.
I was never a Mistress to anyone who I had dated, I did not even have some wild dating experiences. I just dated those prominent in a polygamist heir's style but as a girl. That is all.
My inherited titles are for my own heir is a true statement, but being me who is a Queen of what I own, I can create titles to entitle all my biological children upon their birth is also a true statement. That is a Queen do, right? I am blessed that I have tons of titles I had inherited to eligible me to create titles to hierarchy from.
*My grandfathers entrusted wealth together with some titles that created especially for me being an heiress. So, my birth lawful father does not have any title but I inherited a lot together with my trusts that set up by my grandfathers. I have over 10 grandfathers had been Emperors but I do not know how many titles I inherited. As the heir of this generation, I inherited all my family's titles plus some "entrusted" titles.
East Han Dynasty, 3-4 Emperors were my grandfathers.
Tang Dynasty, over 11 Emperors were my grandfathers, and one ruling Empress was my grandmother.
Southern Tang Dynasty, 3 Emperors were my grandfathers.
----Dec. 24th, 2017
Heard radio program's shit throwing is just some challenge that is all about "being a provided for or being a desire to be provided for should be the ruler of the provider or a potential provider".
My response: I refuse to hire anyone to rule me or govern me. I refuse anything this sort of.
Who should be the ruler of other people's private wealth or of another wealthy person is none of my business unless that has impacts on my own biological children's interests.
The supporting evidence of the challenge is "Government officials are paid by tax-payers to govern (rule) taxpayers", Royals are supported by tax-payers to be the Royals, etc. What is wrong to be the person that been provided for to rule the provider?
I am a tax-payer of the United States, I say I understand that the United States Government officials are paid by the United States' taxpayers to govern common interests of all U.S. citizens to ensure every U.S. citizen to have the lawful rights that granted by U.S. Constitution can be effectively same equal in front of U.S. laws and effectively protected by laws. What else?
---- Dec. 24th, 2017
I often address myself an heir to my grandfathers because I was brought up as a boy. I am an heiress of an almost 2000-years-long history polygamist family that has the male polygamist's privilege in my romance.
I was never a Mistress to anyone who I had dated, I did not even have some wild dating experiences. I just dated those prominent in a polygamist heir's style but as a girl. That is all.
My inherited titles are for my own heir is a true statement, but being me who is a Queen of what I own, I can create titles to entitle all my biological children upon their birth is also a true statement. That is a Queen do, right? I am blessed that I have tons of titles I had inherited to eligible me to create titles to hierarchy from.
*My grandfathers entrusted wealth together with some titles that created especially for me being an heiress. So, my birth lawful father does not have any title but I inherited a lot together with my trusts that set up by my grandfathers. I have over 10 grandfathers had been Emperors but I do not know how many titles I inherited. As the heir of this generation, I inherited all my family's titles plus some "entrusted" titles.
East Han Dynasty, 3-4 Emperors were my grandfathers.
Tang Dynasty, over 11 Emperors were my grandfathers, and one ruling Empress was my grandmother.
Southern Tang Dynasty, 3 Emperors were my grandfathers.
----Dec. 24th, 2017
Heard radio program's shit throwing is just some challenge that is all about "being a provided for or being a desire to be provided for should be the ruler of the provider or a potential provider".
My response: I refuse to hire anyone to rule me or govern me. I refuse anything this sort of.
Who should be the ruler of other people's private wealth or of another wealthy person is none of my business unless that has impacts on my own biological children's interests.
The supporting evidence of the challenge is "Government officials are paid by tax-payers to govern (rule) taxpayers", Royals are supported by tax-payers to be the Royals, etc. What is wrong to be the person that been provided for to rule the provider?
I am a tax-payer of the United States, I say I understand that the United States Government officials are paid by the United States' taxpayers to govern common interests of all U.S. citizens to ensure every U.S. citizen to have the lawful rights that granted by U.S. Constitution can be effectively same equal in front of U.S. laws and effectively protected by laws. What else?
---- Dec. 24th, 2017