Home

Three elements to recognize if it is an opportunity to succeed:

1) Can you understand the frustration expressed during the conversation to identify the possible causes of the frustration?

2) Can you identify if you can offer some help from your knowledge, experiences, and expertise?

3) Can you effectively communicate your expertise to be understood as possible helpful solutions?

----Min Fang, July 10th of 2019


Featured Articles

Friday, October 26, 2018

10-26-2018 Confusions and Anger from China (来自中国的困扰和愤怒)

10-26-2018 Confusions and Anger from China (来自中国的困扰和愤怒)


1: Exactly, what money is Min Fang's own money that should be given to Min Fang by the U.S. government? (中文附后)
My explanation: This money is transferred from Min Fang's Trust's investment in the United States to the U.S. Treasury Department's financial service office to be transferred into my personal private account, with the financial service charge as well, as the agreement reached on July 1st of 2004 (not the official date). The paying companies have all been U.S. commercial products-providing or service-providing companies with retail or wholesale business.

Confusion from China has been if this money is actually routed from China's Central Reserve, the answer is Never.

In China, it is a common practice for a commercial company take-in some cash as its income and gives back a commercial receipt together with the remaining amount of the money after its service charge of such commercial receipt. In China's anger, confusion from the Chinese general public is if the money has announced to give to me instead of giving back to some unknown corrupted Chinese government officials. The answer is this is an incorrect assumption. In the United States, this type of activities is a severe crime, Federal and State, to all parties involved. The company involved would be charged with conducting the money-laundry crime(洗钱罪名), the criminal charge against me would be "unknown source of money"(财产来源不明罪)。

This money that paying company provided are the profits from their daily business operations on the U.S. soil, such as selling goods or providing services. As the paying companies have testified, the paying companies are all upon each's lawfully registered investor-company's instruction to give me this money from each's profits instead of hand-in to each's lawfully registered investor-company.


2: Exactly, what is Min Fang's own money and what is Min Fang's Trust's money?
My explanation: I heard yesterday's broadcasting has explained why my same parents' younger brother or my father side cousins don't have any inheritable-share to claim in my willed Trust-inheriting, which is the explanation official given according to the People's Republic of China's inheriting laws and entrusting laws, as well as the United States' and Britain's inheriting laws and entrusting laws. This morning's broadcasting further clarified more confusion about money's lawful ownership.

So, according to each of my grandfather's will and according to laws, I am the sole beneficiary person to each Trust I inherited, why I only state my yearly providing is my own money? It is because my Trusts are all business entities that have been investing. All the money in-investing are in-investment-usage money that only the profits after business investment consideration can be for my personal usage. Once this profits money transferred out of my Trusts' business investing activities, it is entirely my own money because I am the sole beneficiary person of my Trusts. By the way, this is the same concept for the very common investor-tax in the U.S. and Europe -- Once the money out of business investing, it is the investor's personal income needs to pay investor-tax.


----October 26th, 2018


1:究竟什么是方敏自己的钱应该由美国政府交给方敏使用?
我的解释:这钱是由方敏的信托在美国的投资公司按照2004年7月1日(非正式日期)和美国财政部达成的协议转入美国财政部的财务服务办公室并支付相应的手续费用,由美国财政部负责转入我方敏的私人使用账户。付款公司都是美国的商务实业或者商务服务公司,都有批发或者零售经营的实体店面。

来自中国的困扰就是这些付款公司的钱款给付是否其实是来自中国国库的钱,回答:从来不是。

一间商业公司在收取费用后,将转入该公司的某一笔钱再转回给汇款者的其他账户并附一张该公司的商务发票,在中国是一种很平常的现象。来自中国的一片愤怒中,中国普通老百姓的愤怒是这些公开宣布必须给方敏的钱是否其实是从中国国库出来的钱,没直接转回给那几个匿名的贪官而是宣布给了方敏。回答:这是一种谬误和错觉。在美国,对所有参与人员和机构来说,这种做法都是严重的刑事犯罪行为。对于参与公司来说,是刑事洗钱罪,对我方敏来说,是刑事财产来源不明罪*。

这些付款公司所给付的钱都是由这些付款公司在美国领土上的每天或销售商品或提供商业服务等等的商业经营活动所产生的商业盈利中支付的。就像这些付款公司的作证说明,这些付款公司都是在其法律上有效注册的合法投资公司的指示下才将其应该上交给该投资公司的商业盈利分红转交支付给我使用的。


2:究竟什么是方敏自己的钱,什么是方敏的信托的钱?
我的解释:我听说昨天的广播剧播出内容,按照中华人民共和国,美国及英国的继承法和信托法,解释了为什么我同父同母的弟弟以及我父系的亲戚们在那些我按遗嘱所继承的信托里没有一丝一毫的可继承份额。据说今天早上的播出是进一步依据法律阐明谁才是哪些钱财的合法主人。

这样说来,按照我每一个爷爷的遗嘱以及按照法律,我是我所继承的每一个信托的唯一受益人,那我为什么只说我每年应受到的生活费给付才是我自己的钱?这是因为我的那些信托都是些经营机构一直都在进行商业投资活动。所有这些放在投资经营里的钱都是正在商业投资使用中的钱,就只有那些不作为投资使用的每年盈利部分才可以转出我的信托的商业投资活动,以作为我的私人给付使用。一旦这些钱转出我的信托的商业投资活动,因为我是信托的唯一受益人,所有这些钱就都是我自己的钱。顺便提一句,这和在欧美很平常的投资人税是同一种概念,就是某笔钱一旦离开商业投资活动,就是该钱的合法主人即投资人的个人收入所得需要缴纳投资人税。

*有关什么是财产来源不明罪,2004年1月时,很多人都听说我以前住过的曼哈顿那家人和我为一个房子的什么事有过矛盾。这个矛盾的起因就是我在2004年1月被调查我为何有钱买了一套70-100万美金的房子。我就没听懂怎么回事,一直以为是那家人以我的名字向银行贷款也不和我说一声,让我以后自己想贷款买房子都没有贷款额度。但我当时已经解释了那房子不是我的,那家人有钱可以支付其20%的首付。


----2018年10月26日。