10-31-2018 A dissolved Trust is an unclaimed property or an equivalent to a no owner house

10-31-2018 A dissolved Trust is an unclaimed property or an equivalent to a no owner house


I heard this morning's broadcasting is impressively saying I am a resident of a hostility State, which is after the hostility expressed by the city officials I am a resident of several months ago, all because both believed I have no money of my own but insisted on continuing living on taxpayers' money, and no matter how popular the reality radio program based on my life stories had been, somehow both agreed there should not be my share at all in the money it generated which I called it major featured person fee. This was the story I was told about this morning's broadcasting. And I know for certain Boston's Chinese community has this understanding about who I am. It is rumored this morning's Boston Chinese group are the same year graduates from the same high school (南师大附中) that I graduated from in 1985, not the first similar group broadcasted this similar opinion on this same radio program, nor the only school I graduated from.

Regarding if the major featured person fee should also pay to all these people that had been in stories that associated me with classmates, etc, I know for sure it is all according to the United States laws that regulate reality show's producing, broadcasting and related. I heard the radio company has already communicated all these law-related to all those who are interested to know how much they should get paid because of this radio program's success. Please direct all these confusions and anger to the producing company for explanations.

Regarding the shared true honest understanding among them that I am a useless person to be associated with and it was years ago, I respond with true honesty as well "the same is the vise visa".

The hostility:
Well, I said about killing to de-own a Trust is some group of people's fantasy to get money that I am not willing to give. How exactly is this possible? Is this me exaggerating my situation? Well, if one knows once the beneficiary or beneficiaries are no longer alive would cause a Trust to be de-owned(dissolved) as an unclaimed property or No-owner property, one won't deny what won't be a difference to eliminate a sole beneficiary or the entire beneficiary group when the public killing is propaganda on the public media as "nothing wrong but death executed".

The background: 
In the United States and a lot of Europe countries, a no-owner real estate property can be owned by an occupant even that is the result from a break-in, an unclaimed property can be auctioned to be distributable fund negotiable among government agencies. A company owned by a Trust is an organization equivalent to a property which can generate yearly distributable fund.

The pieces of possible evidence:
Now, do you think I am exaggerating if hearing all these people who don't allow me to spend my own living expenses providing are also the people who tie themselves to be so closely associated to the investments of my Trusts that I claimed? Isn't my intellectual incomes have impressively been understood as "can be owned by refusal to return or the refusal of the continuing payment to be stopped"?

Also, the way how private Assistant Ding's children had tied themselves through broadcasting to F's and R's as the seems-eligible-for-ownership-confusion group. I have accused private assistant Ding may be responsible to my grandparents (both) death when they were both not allowed to spend their own money by private assistant Ding's relatives when they were hospitalized in 1958 and 1965? Those relatives are the producers of this radio program for some time already.

The rumored logic:
The rumored propaganda has been some money-wanter group may throw someone a penny if this someone can help them to get billions. The logic of all this is "who cares about your money after you become a dead body no matter how you express your unwillingness?" which I responded with who cares why you want the money but why it has to be you who own that money and this will be till your death day.

The assumed plan:
So, I assume their plan is "Just do this or that no matter how ridiculous or illegal anyone may complain about, no one can do anything about it because everyone is already well-positioned to ensure so". Well, I say I already complained to the professional law enforcing people even though I don't know if well-positioned also covers them as well. At least, I am still very comfortable to speak up what pisses me off and I am still very comfortable to be quiet.

The further possible reason:
I chose to live in Boston during my anxiety treatment, it is rumored that Massachusetts' anger has been why I did those upgrading in JPM Chase's tech center in Massachusetts which has caused a lot of troubles to Massachusetts. I don't know about any troubles I had caused to Massachusetts by upgrading computer technology for a company, but I understand the confusion is from that fact I did not do anything related to improve banking industry's computer security but all these nobody-needed changes and related confusion that these upgrading made malicious efforts can be customer-ordered.

My answer to this type of confusion is: Banking industry has tons of talented people experienced enough on facilities security that if all these specialty knowledge can be helped by those computer technology upgrading to be applicable on virtue banking facility (internet banking)  as well, I am and I was too green to do more on securing the banking industry's information system facility.

My answer to the related confusion is: the same also applies to anti-malicious efforts.


----October 31st, 2018

10-30-2018 Some "not realistic" concerns from the Chinese community and More about JPM Chase Change

10-30-2018 Some "not realistic" concerns from the Chinese community and more about JPM Chase Change


This morning's broadcasting which is rumored still broadcasting in some radio channel somewhere if not NYC, it is announced that I am expected to be handsomely shopping-capable without cash or a credit card.

I heard it is broadcasted as, for in-store shopping, a cashier can discount me with the manager's instruction or with the store's security tape of me purchasing the item together with the receipt. I personally totally don't object this privilege if the store employee is willing to offer this privilege to me, but I promise I won't complain as well if the employee feels more comfortable to consult the store manager before relying on the store's security tape as well.

Also, I heard it is announced if anyone willing to offer me real estate treat, the General Attorney's office needed to be contacted because I won't be the person paying the rents, which would be obviously true enough before I finally receive my handsome yearly providing. And I won't hesitate to move-in once I receive the moving authorization letter from BHA or the General Attorney's office because it should be based on appropriate arrangement made to cover rents appropriately, but I won't move in with my chunks from my current residence because my current apartment should have already paid in full was the 2004's deal I remembered, and for over 50 years is what I heard of.

If I can get above privileges, I will be the happy one. "Not realistic" won't be my concern.

Ok, now is the confusion expressed about the blog article regarding JPM Chase change I wrote. Well, a technology person who participated that change in Lowell, MA has commented in this morning's broadcasting that he only recognizes the spreadsheet table is authentic true account for what happened, but not everything else. Those are too stretchy and don't make any sense.

Well, I started laughing when I heard this comment, obviously, I have not graduated from the MBA education yet. ( 09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPM Chase )

The link is the article this technology person complained about which was my effort to recall what happened in JPM Chase as an MBA student with a technology background, "doesn't make sense" stated the obvious that my blog article failed to communicate something clearly between "what to change"(the spreadsheet table) and "how to change" which was the change process that I did not participate as a manager but as a part of the human resource efforts. Some said it may be because I was not an employee who never participated in any town hall meetings organized by the tech management that were related to this changing process.

This blog article started off as my homework for course MBA503 Organizational Change, which emphasizes this change's impacts on the organization instead of the computer technology academically. In MBA, an organization's change always has "what need to change" and the change process of "how to change". In this article, I was recalling the JPM Chase's technology upgrading I participated from viewing it as a successful organizational change, not just some technology events.

I heard misunderstanding about this organizational change experience was mostly about how this change can increase business opportunities relates to enhancing computer security that I was invited to take a look at on July 1st of 2004. The answer is: Any security enhancement is a customer-order on security which needs to be fulfilled exactly as requested to achieve the objective of the highest level of security that technology can offer. If improving quality control on developing web applications or software is the necessity to enhance security on the network & information system, why not increase some business opportunities by offering customer-order web application(software) to improve business clients' experiences as well?


----October 30th, 2018

10-29-2018 Trust Entity, Trust Inheriting and No-Owner Trust

10-29-2018 Trust Entity, Trust Inheriting and No-Owner Trust 


Li's Family Trust company in Hong Kong, a lot of times, I am asked if this is the company created by the Trust my grandfather set up for me in 1948? I heard it is confirmed as "there are at least 6 such companies created by a Li's Trust that set up in the 1940s are now operating their business in the Hong Kong area, which company?"

I heard, in this morning's broadcasting, both my great-grandmother and my grandfather had named each's Trust set up for me as Li's (Family) Trust （李氏（李家）信托）. So, I am associated with two of such companies, I heard my grandfather's is the biggest one, both as the sole beneficiary person. I heard my great-grandmother had conditioned my inheriting to provide my father a living as he desires which proved to be my full-heart pleasure before I heard of this Trust, which was the reason I quietly inherited it (1941 with 60,000 Dayang) without the reading. (I also heard the real truth is no such condition at all from my great-grandmother.)

Well,  with all these sole-beneficiary Trust-inheriting, what will happen if a situation does happen but no next-kin inheriting as well according to my own will? I expressed my own willingness as "No-owner is not an option either" in a will-letter to the U.S laws. What this means? It means I am free from the horrifying rumor of "government agency(agencies) can conduct murder to de-own a Trust in order to get some money". It means it is according to my will that no any government nor any organization can own any money from any of my Trusts as no-owner wealth if a situation happens.

So, how will I provide for my father who is a book-nuts to my great-grandmother, to satisfy my great-grandmother's wish to let him live happily in his desired way? Good health insurance, comfortable living as I have already provided since 2004. I was complained about not emphasizing it is my father side grandfathers' blessing that I am providing for my parents, and I am willing to stress that but not knowing how yet. My father is not the person can handle financial stress which I heard is the opinion I share with my great-grandmother. So, my thoughts are to lower my mother's dress-providing level to the degree that is a match for their 10 years age difference in their appearances. (My father already earned his allowance difference with my mother which is much higher as a retired Science Academy scientist versus a retired level 1 accountant).

Also, about sayings how I disrespect my grandmother. It is nonsense to say so. She was my grandmother no matter what marriage issue my grandfather complained.  I heard my grandfather died with a broken heart by such news at his deathbed that three out of her four children are not even my grandfather's blood, which already says what situation I have to deal. I do what is necessary to clarify that, my Trust inheriting, and my relative-gifting to my father's siblings, both have nothing to do with such rumors. And I state here that I heard private assistant Ding was the only affair my grandmother had which was 8-9 years after she already had been sharing four children with my grandfather. It was my grandmother who confused my father's young age siblings about their blood. I never disrespected my grandmother.


----October 29th, 2018

10-28-2018 Promoting the New Era in Software Developing is the reason I have been abused?

10-28-2018 Promoting the New Era in Software Developing is the reason I have been abused?


I heard my yesterday's blog article has triggered a lot of discussions if my personal experiences are saying that the United States government sector also has this if Constitutional doubts, well, I heard a lot of very impressive co-operative efforts to abuse me are from those who heard of the big secret that I am announced a State Enemy to the United States since 2007 on the radio program "undercover-ly" which means the audience doesn't know it was me that being announced a State Enemy if not an insider. This entire time, these people have been wondering how long it takes to eventually evict me from the United States or if my complaints are the results of being executed penalties accordingly. I heard the reason I am announced a State Enemy was because of the computer technology upgrading I promoted in JPM Chase between August of 2004- January of 2007. I have a post stating it is ridiculous that this organizational change of computer technology upgrading that happened in JPM Chase was somehow misunderstood as some sort of very destructive political movement, I repost its MBA Force Field analysis table below which listed reasons to change in the column of "Forces drive the change" and what changes I promoted in the column of "To reduce forces resist the changes". The score column represents the change item's priority level in my understanding.

The objective of the JPM Chase's change between 2004-2007 was

To change software developing from the status quo of 
"expecting the Business take-in whatever is developed by the technology" 

to the new era of  
"requesting the technology to develop software exactly as the Business requested or as the Business' customer-order."




About another impressive group, the R names, well, possible related rumors are:

1: The rumor "the mother married to the father at the same time when the daughter married to the son" is possibly the description of how influential the mother is to the father. The mother is one of the "Pejoves" who have been confused about the "Pejoves" Fund company's lawful ownership, plus if the father's $500,000 daily spending is to spend on me or to donate to the special donation program.

I say to the mother please direct your confusion to the "Pejoves" company and the father. It is very annoying to hear so many "hold it" to the money that I lawfully own and am in need to use.

2: The same equal Chinese Yu families have been all around them.
It is rumored that the Chinese Yu families are biologically related to my grandfather's former private assistant Mr. Ding's birth father. I have to say this private assistant Ding is possibly my family's bad luck or even a curse ever since he was hired.

The Chinese Yu clan is

• The same equal to all those confused families including some of Mrs. Rs' maiden names on the confusion of "why the providing has to stop?!", even though the Yu clan got the money by illegally detained my monthly living expenses providing for over 29 years (between July of 1967- Oct. of 1996), while those confused families were because of contributions to those companies' growth.

• The same equal to the British Royals because of the "real birth mother" of the rumored four biologically real British children, which is an un-verifiable but a very respected information nonetheless to all Rs.

• The same equal to the "Duane Reade pharmacist" because they are from the four generations already actress-actor family as well. If I remember it correctly, Mr. "Duane Reade pharmacist" is the legal husband to the mother and the legal birth father to the daughter listed in rumor 1, both mother and daughter are obviously very important to R names.

• The same equal wealthy to R's name because my Trusts' investments in R's family business seems already considered as "effectively taken over already" which can be heard from some Rs' confused anger of "Why all these challenges about the ownership power of R's family business?"

3: The insider rumor of "Whose lover this Chinese woman Min Fang has been" among R's names.
This entire time, I kept on saying I only met one person having the R's name, and the entire world felt with me that I have been chased after by the entire group of R names while I am financially handsomely independent has been at least in my own understanding, what could possibly be the problem?

The problem was rumored because I visited MoMA (a museum) in the big New York City in January and February of 2015, and my visits were seen by some Chinese which sparked the rumor if I had been a lover to its biggest donator, a late Mr. R. But I never heard of the late Mr. R at all which is a certain information to a lot of R names, and the late Mr. R himself certainly never suspected anything such sort of, but his late wife's children have been all very angry about it.

So, I clarify some references: The late Mr. R was the person invested in those movies and Broadway shows that I participated in the discussion on July 1st of 2004. The truth of what happened on that day was he was conducting his own investing business which I had complained as "totally impacted my investment share in those opportunities" since I heard of his name in this year of 2018. And that was all.

----October 28th, 2018

10-27-2018 Min Fang's response (方敏的回应）

10-27-2018 Min Fang's response (方敏的回应）


1: Unbearable truly means no such need & no such reason at all for me to swallow it all to tolerate all these " To destroy you is the only presentation of such association because that is how you got this association" expression. （难以承受确实就是在说没有任何需要也没有任何理由，让我忍辱带愤的容让所有这些“摧毁你的一切就是唯一和你交往的方式，你不就是这么被时刻摧毁着才可以够资格打打电话之类的可以有点关系吗？”以及类似的表白。)

2: Infront of laws of any lawful country that has a valid Constitution, a citizen with a government office almighty should still be a part of the people not above the people nor led by the people. （在任何一个有着有效的宪法的法治国家，政府高官作为一个公民，在法律面前都应只是人民的一部分，“王子犯法与庶民同罪”，而不是高于人民或被人民领导着。）

听的懂中英文的都知道这一句 “She confused herself with the people(“她把自己等同于了人民"） 也就是”你他妈算老几，也就是人民一份子而已。(truly means "Who the fuch do you think you are, you are just one of the people")。


----October 27th, 2018

10-26-2018 Confusions and Anger from China (来自中国的困扰和愤怒）

10-26-2018 Confusions and Anger from China (来自中国的困扰和愤怒）


1: Exactly, what money is Min Fang's own money that should be given to Min Fang by the U.S. government? （中文附后）
My explanation: This money is transferred from Min Fang's Trust's investment in the United States to the U.S. Treasury Department's financial service office to be transferred into my personal private account, with the financial service charge as well, as the agreement reached on July 1st of 2004 (not the official date). The paying companies have all been U.S. commercial products-providing or service-providing companies with retail or wholesale business.

Confusion from China has been if this money is actually routed from China's Central Reserve, the answer is Never.

In China, it is a common practice for a commercial company take-in some cash as its income and gives back a commercial receipt together with the remaining amount of the money after its service charge of such commercial receipt. In China's anger, confusion from the Chinese general public is if the money has announced to give to me instead of giving back to some unknown corrupted Chinese government officials. The answer is this is an incorrect assumption. In the United States, this type of activities is a severe crime, Federal and State, to all parties involved. The company involved would be charged with conducting the money-laundry crime（洗钱罪名）, the criminal charge against me would be "unknown source of money"(财产来源不明罪）。

This money that paying company provided are the profits from their daily business operations on the U.S. soil, such as selling goods or providing services. As the paying companies have testified, the paying companies are all upon each's lawfully registered investor-company's instruction to give me this money from each's profits instead of hand-in to each's lawfully registered investor-company.


2: Exactly, what is Min Fang's own money and what is Min Fang's Trust's money？
My explanation: I heard yesterday's broadcasting has explained why my same parents' younger brother or my father side cousins don't have any inheritable-share to claim in my willed Trust-inheriting, which is the explanation official given according to the People's Republic of China's inheriting laws and entrusting laws, as well as the United States' and Britain's inheriting laws and entrusting laws. This morning's broadcasting further clarified more confusion about money's lawful ownership.

So, according to each of my grandfather's will and according to laws, I am the sole beneficiary person to each Trust I inherited, why I only state my yearly providing is my own money? It is because my Trusts are all business entities that have been investing. All the money in-investing are in-investment-usage money that only the profits after business investment consideration can be for my personal usage. Once this profits money transferred out of my Trusts' business investing activities, it is entirely my own money because I am the sole beneficiary person of my Trusts. By the way, this is the same concept for the very common investor-tax in the U.S. and Europe -- Once the money out of business investing, it is the investor's personal income needs to pay investor-tax.


----October 26th, 2018


1：究竟什么是方敏自己的钱应该由美国政府交给方敏使用？
我的解释：这钱是由方敏的信托在美国的投资公司按照2004年7月1日（非正式日期）和美国财政部达成的协议转入美国财政部的财务服务办公室并支付相应的手续费用，由美国财政部负责转入我方敏的私人使用账户。付款公司都是美国的商务实业或者商务服务公司，都有批发或者零售经营的实体店面。

来自中国的困扰就是这些付款公司的钱款给付是否其实是来自中国国库的钱，回答：从来不是。

一间商业公司在收取费用后，将转入该公司的某一笔钱再转回给汇款者的其他账户并附一张该公司的商务发票，在中国是一种很平常的现象。来自中国的一片愤怒中，中国普通老百姓的愤怒是这些公开宣布必须给方敏的钱是否其实是从中国国库出来的钱，没直接转回给那几个匿名的贪官而是宣布给了方敏。回答：这是一种谬误和错觉。在美国，对所有参与人员和机构来说，这种做法都是严重的刑事犯罪行为。对于参与公司来说，是刑事洗钱罪，对我方敏来说，是刑事财产来源不明罪*。

这些付款公司所给付的钱都是由这些付款公司在美国领土上的每天或销售商品或提供商业服务等等的商业经营活动所产生的商业盈利中支付的。就像这些付款公司的作证说明，这些付款公司都是在其法律上有效注册的合法投资公司的指示下才将其应该上交给该投资公司的商业盈利分红转交支付给我使用的。


2：究竟什么是方敏自己的钱，什么是方敏的信托的钱？
我的解释：我听说昨天的广播剧播出内容，按照中华人民共和国，美国及英国的继承法和信托法，解释了为什么我同父同母的弟弟以及我父系的亲戚们在那些我按遗嘱所继承的信托里没有一丝一毫的可继承份额。据说今天早上的播出是进一步依据法律阐明谁才是哪些钱财的合法主人。

这样说来，按照我每一个爷爷的遗嘱以及按照法律，我是我所继承的每一个信托的唯一受益人，那我为什么只说我每年应受到的生活费给付才是我自己的钱？这是因为我的那些信托都是些经营机构一直都在进行商业投资活动。所有这些放在投资经营里的钱都是正在商业投资使用中的钱，就只有那些不作为投资使用的每年盈利部分才可以转出我的信托的商业投资活动，以作为我的私人给付使用。一旦这些钱转出我的信托的商业投资活动，因为我是信托的唯一受益人，所有这些钱就都是我自己的钱。顺便提一句，这和在欧美很平常的投资人税是同一种概念，就是某笔钱一旦离开商业投资活动，就是该钱的合法主人即投资人的个人收入所得需要缴纳投资人税。

*有关什么是财产来源不明罪，2004年1月时，很多人都听说我以前住过的曼哈顿那家人和我为一个房子的什么事有过矛盾。这个矛盾的起因就是我在2004年1月被调查我为何有钱买了一套70-100万美金的房子。我就没听懂怎么回事，一直以为是那家人以我的名字向银行贷款也不和我说一声，让我以后自己想贷款买房子都没有贷款额度。但我当时已经解释了那房子不是我的，那家人有钱可以支付其20%的首付。


----2018年10月26日。

10-25-2018 The Abnormalities Related to My Romances

10-25-2018 The Abnormalities Related to My Romances


Yesterday, I said in Chinese that rumored biologically real four Chinese British children definitely do not carry my blood. Reason? Well, if you have heard a miserable Shanghai girl died at age of 31years old in the 1970s, you can hear a lot of similarities in those featured broadcasting. Anything she wanted should be her cousins to enjoy or to give-out which including those males who she attracted to. She died with wrenched a heart and all her cousins' hate. In this rumored story, all were because her father set up a sole beneficiary Trust in Hong Kong for her in 1946 when she was only one year's old which conditioned her inheriting should be after she had a lovely birth child of her own. And Albert Gore's famous Chinese romance is rumored this girl's father side fourth cousin, now one won't feel surprised a bit why those four Chinese British children announced as Albert Gore's Chinese romance's first cousin's children yesterday on the public media and why I have publicly accused Albert Gore has robbed me publicly through the radio program's producing efforts.

The most horrible part of this rumor is Albert Gore's Chinese romance's maiden family and some other related families did get good sized money from that Shanghai girl's Trust after her death, because that Trust became a no-owner Trust after that Shanghai girl's death which became Chinese Foreign Department's negotiable with the British government, being her father-side cousins who have worked for Chinese foreign Department, Albert Gore's Chinese romance's maiden family benefited from the negotiation. It was rumored all Shanghai girl's cousins were not eligible for Next Kin inheriting to her Trust because they were the reasons for her early and miserable death. Now you won't feel uncomfortable to say "No wonder it feels like as if everyone is waiting for the Chinese woman Min Fang to be abused to death which has been announced so loudly on the radio, as if nothing should be wrong with it even in such a lawful country like the United States", and all these loud announcements were rumored announced by Albert Gore and his Chinese romance, obviously with the experiences and with the victory hauls. So, I expressed myself to the United States Laws as a citizen to the U.S. that I refuse to be a victim of such possible negotiations between any governments (governing agencies).

I also stated in Chinese yesterday on my blog that I have been really lucky that other than my romance has not been "normal" compared to others, I have been overall well enough which are factually true because I quietly inherited in 2004, my financial providing have been quietly paid-out on time as decided in 2004, and I have quietly enjoyed some of the handsome providings. And I am looking forward to enjoying my living situation changes soon enough, and to meet someone around some corners to get lost in his handsome eyes soon enough. Some would say I should add if I am, a victim or not, in the situation to move on, well, I say I am a polygamist.

Well, if anyone asks how "unnormal" my romances had been, well, the first one would be when I was in China, those males only had shown up only to tell me they had been interested in me and went disappeared immediately to get busy on their own dating if I did not dislike their interesting presentations, and showed up again 10 years later to repeat such interesting presentation and also did repeat the same "disappeared to get busy on dating without my involvement", and have expressed their agonies so loudly when the repetitive same presentations not producing the expected results.

The second would be why Rs' women have been so agitated as if they would be so threatened by me when my biological daughter already publicly announced impressively as (if) carrying F's name so long ago in 2011? Because I am a woman expecting the traditional polygamist male's privileges? but themselves are not the eligibles to have such an illusion.

The third would be those efforts to throw me a left-over male who is the father of some woman's child if not children already, and those efforts to confuse the public if I am even eligible to have a romance at all, etc.


----October 25th, 2018

10-24-2018 传说中真实的中英混血的四个小孩真的和我无关，以及其他

10-24-2018 传说中真实的中英混血的四个小孩真的和我无关，以及其他


听说了有个英国的于家小姐替年轻的英国王储W生了（4+1）个小孩，难怪华人圈里一直说有4个真实的小孩。不过，你要是听说过上海的那个于家小姐信托故事，听说过那上海于小姐是如何喜欢上一个就被她的堂姐妹爱上一个嫁了一个或者推荐给了其好姊妹一个，又听说这个生孩子的英国于家小姐是阿尔伯特·高尔那个华人恋人中国外交部前雇员居住纽约的于小姐的一等亲，也就是在上海的于家小姐没孩没婚没任何男人爱而在31岁时就忧郁悲惨去世之后拿到了上海于家小姐的父亲替上海于小姐所设立的信托里的一部分钱的那些北方于家人中的一个，那你就知道不管这英国于小姐生孩子故事及其相关故事是真是假，确实没有我方敏可以说三道四的，也就是强调那几个小孩确实和我没有任何关系。

我真是很幸运了，直到2004年，除了找不到适合结婚的对象，我还算是安全，既顺利继承了信托也已经享受到了信托给付的医疗照顾。上海的于家小姐，就因为父亲的爱希望她能有个有爱的婚姻所定下的条款，连一分钱的生活费用给付都没有享受到。说到谈恋爱，我在中国遇见的几个，就是什么李克强（李政纲），小贺（贺国强), 等等，都是很奇怪的，在我方敏表达有兴趣之后就立即失踪了，过上十年八年再来露个脸看我没反感就又立即失踪了，在失踪期间的恋爱都是谈的红红火火的，现在方敏我知道其中原因了，原来是有个丁家私人助理一家可能在隐形操纵（据说丁家私人助理认识上海于家小姐的父系于家亲戚）。我还算是幸运，确实没认为需要他们这些老伙的一身老皮才可以够资格在人前晃晃，也没和他们多说几句话，所以确实也没因他们的失踪而悲愤而忧郁。估计也就因为我如此太不悲凉，所以这几个人对我这态度的愤怒是全世界都听到了“你他妈的算老几，把钱拿来！”。至于在美国碰见的几个，都是因为他们自己经历的原因。

现在，要是依据广播剧对我方敏的宣布，也就是纽约的于小姐以及其恋爱男友阿尔伯特·高尔，还有中国的李克强和贺国强的婚姻亲朋等等的高调宣布，根本就是上海于家小姐当年的遭遇，就是不准有孩子，不准被男人爱，不准有任何婚姻，再加上就只配让中国政府给杀了然后把钱归他们所有。可惜我坚决不乐意所以我就坚决持续不停的报警了。

我个人的一些看法及我听到的道听途说：
1：我就一直痛骂中国政府外交部的种种做法根本是一家妓院外交部，结果听说中国外交部在1949年，1950年大批雇佣了当时对中国共产党新政府的态度立场友善的妓院子弟（因为外交部的开明态度不会因其父母职业而妨碍他们成为国家干部），也就是说中华人民共和国外交部当年就是如此起家的。

2：我就一直很愤怒美国政府外交部在处理美国广播公司的广播剧事件上的“不见影子任由中国方面无理造谣诽谤谩骂“的立场，结果我听说美国外交部的华裔雇员是和中国外交部方面就此交涉的人员，而这些华裔雇员是中国五四运动时被学生痛骂的北洋政府那些人的后裔，他们现在都是美国这个移民国家的一部分。
*北洋政府是当时北伐军政府和清朝洋务运动政府的混合体，五四学生最著名的口号是“外争主权，内惩国贼.”。

3:我就一直奇怪为什么这个纽约的于小姐就是要定了那个由香港我爷爷替我设立的信托在2004年汇往美国的我的五亿美金。

据说是因为洛杉矶华人都知1965年的洛杉矶的于李两家就香港的李家信托应该归谁的争执而引发的洛杉矶华人大规模械斗早就让纽约的那个于小姐的洛杉矶于家亲戚赢得了香港的李家信托，据说是这个洛杉矶于家的孙子在坚称已经打赢了所以拥有了香港的李家信托公司。结果我听说这根本就是没发生过的事情。

我听说的是那个洛杉矶的李家和香港李家信托完全无关，（我还不太清楚我和李家信托是否有关），而香港方面也从未听说洛杉矶的于家父子找了一个洛杉矶姓李的打架打赢了就拥有了该香港李家信托公司的传闻，而洛杉矶的于家父子也没打赢，却是因为召集械斗并造成洛杉矶李家的人员伤亡而被洛杉矶警方给关进了监狱，据说于家的父亲死在了监狱里于家的儿子现在还在监狱里。


----2018年10月24日。

10-23-2018 Some power to "Drag you to death" is from the Chinese community in West Coast

10-23-2018 Some power to "Drag you to death" is from the Chinese community in West Coast

It is well-known to the entire world that I have been a victim of a ridiculous Chinese government who insist on threatening me to demand money without any legal ground, I took every bit of those swears and blackmails that this 2012- administration of the Chinese government helped to broadcast worldwide through the American radio company to be intentionally malicious, but how this 12-hours flight-away government can be so almighty powerfully impact my life in the United States?

By the United States government's help? of course, one would imagine there would be some. But obviously, it has been emphasized the United States is a lawful country because I am protected by laws. Some of the evidence are: 1)I haven't been evicted from my current residence as well as the United States. 2:) I received the handsome medical treatment providing that I needed. 3) My living expenses providing have been in process of validating if lawful money, and first 3 years already have been clarified lawful. 4:) My 2004 inheriting has been validated lawful.

Also, with so many countries which includes Britain and France have declared their determination to stay as lawful countries, with the evidence that I am still the tolerated individual to be the most famous French financier of the most famous British East India Company, what could be the possible reasons that I can be so impacted by the may-be-very-evil Chinese government so far away?

I have stated some time ago that I am comfortably quiet now because I am protected by laws obviously, and I only have two major sources of own money which are my intellectual incomes and my yearly living expenses providing as a beneficiary to my Trusts. By the way, I heard the Chinese government's anger is why my intellectual incomes can be claimed by whoever but not them from China? I have to say it is illegal to claim-to-own my intellectual incomes in the United States and I heard what happened has been under law-investigation already.

But, with all my intellectual incomes already "taken" at the moment whenever any new incomes are available to be collected, why I am still under the pressure as if to be "drag to death"?

Also, I have denounced myself from the China and Chinese communities abroad in March or so this year of 2018, because being the heir to my ancient Tang dynasty Emperor grandfathers, all my grandfathers and my father and myself don't owe China nor Chinese communities abroad this hate that my father and I have experienced since 2004, but why still this pressure after I sent the denouncement letter to the Chinese government?

After I heard two "drag to death" stories, one from Shanghai, China and one from San Francisco, the United States, I started paying attention to who has this confidence that kills a sole beneficiary person to de-own a Trust can be a route to get money from that Trust. I kind of getting the impression this confidence is from the United States West Coast Chinese community, Los Angels and San Francisco areas to be specific. Evidence: 1) The Chinese director of this radio program, a rumored Boston resident currently, a fourth generation Chinese immigrant came from San Francisco area who also rumored participated such story. 2:) Current dragging-on powerhouse on radio program related is from the rumored 3rd or 4th generations immigrants from the San Franciso or Los Angels area. 3:) In that two "drag to death" stories, both rumoed victims were sole beneficiary persons to the Trusts set up in Hong Kong in the 1940s. 4:) Tons of Chinese rich person have settled in Los Angels and San Francis area after they fled China around the year 1948-1949.


----October 23rd, 2018

10-22-2018 Boston's Almighty Highness Magic 106.7FM radio station

10-22-2018 Boston's Almighty Highness Magic 106.7FM radio station


Boston's magic 106.7FM radio station is the almighty highness radio station who so deserves to supervise all business in greater Boston area if I happen to be a client of, this has been my complaint to law people since 2015.

This supervision style is to keep an eye on my every move in that business including every interaction, even eye contacts, between me and the staff of the business that is under this radio station's so deserved supervision. It has never been just microphones all over the places but cameras.

I heard this co-operative under-supervision has been established by these business' public relation offices, in responding to this radio station's promoting radio program efforts. And this promoting effort radiate from Boston to every corner of the world by its global marketing team to anyone if curious about this radio program's major featured person. The promoting theme has always been: "That Chinese woman Min Fang is a never-wanted fake talent who has no money of her own and don't deserve any money at all from the radio program's over 10 years worldwide successful broadcasting as well, and don't ever listen to anything this Chinese woman Min Fang says." This morning, if you know the channel that still broadcasting the radio program, you should have heard all the reasons why they have been so dedicated doing all these to me after I have made so much money for this radio station's company.

In 2015, my income of major featured person fee from this radio program's worldwide broadcasting had accumulated to over $4Billion, the radio company's profits from this radio program have accumulated to over $12 Billion which does not include those other broadcasting radio companies profits. Till today, I have not received a penny but all these abusiveness in my life in Boston of Massachusetts and all those curses and blackmails you have heard on the radio since 2014.

I heard this morning's broadcasting was sparked by my yesterday's blog article of new treatment technology for Alzheimer patients which has already been available to commercial hospitals. One of this radio station's anchor host Nancy Quill has been dedicated to promoting Alzheimer's awareness, so I was accused that why I am the person announce such a great news on my blog which I responded with: "As if I am still eligible to contact anyone at all from this almighty highness Boston's Magic 106.7FM radio station."

I heard the reasons given by this radio station's staff in this morning's broadcasting are:

1: I spend Rockefellers' money in 2004 which is what they are revenging on behave of.
My response: I have complained about Rockefellers about this matter to U.S. General Attorney's office because I never intended and I never spent any of Rockefellers' any money.

2: I did not participate in producing efforts of the radio program is the reason I don't deserve major featured person fee no matter how profitable this radio program has been.
My response: The fact that my share is the same as the producing team was decided based on the fact that producing team would produce this radio program independently but based on my life experiences and audio materials I myself provided. Most of the stories featured before 2015 have been my life experiences before 2004 which were based on the abstracts from my own security tapes that I myself bought from an agency, not a security company, for a total of $400Million in 2004.

3: Being the radio station's staff, they know the truth of all these fake romances.
My response: Why they ignore the facts who are the liars told all these fake romances?

4: Being the radio station's staff, they won't tolerate me to spend other people's money in any place for any reason.
My response: In the United States, a radio station has never been privileged to be equivalent to a law enforcement unit. And I never spend other people's money. My horrifying experiences have been they stalk me everywhere I have any dealing with.


----October 22nd, 2018

10-21-2018 A five-minutes Alzheimer surgery and overnight recovery ---- Win back one-month precious space lost in current battle (老年痴呆(五分钟手术，过夜恢复)--就可以收复一个月的失地）

10-21-2018 A five-minutes Alzheimer surgery and overnight recovery ---- Win back one-month precious space lost in current battle (老年痴呆(五分钟手术，过夜恢复)--就可以收复一个月的失地）

June 21st in 2018, a sunny Sunday, should be a happy celebration Sunday for every teary struggling person who is a caregiver to an Alzheimer family senior: The cure for Alzheimer is on its way. The rough timing is: the instrument's how-to related training for surgeons may need about a month, the frustration is any new order of the surgical instrument may need some longer time.

The greatest news is only a five-minutes surgery can dramatically takes-back the ground that has been lost in a month time in the current hard battle against Alzheimer, and even a severely progressive patient can recover from this 5-minutes surgery in just overnight time. This is such an affordable and so daily applicable surgery technology is the huge proud for the entire technology invention team.

This is the same or similar surgical instrument for new cancer surgery technology, the updates of this technology are the options of how to retain those biological cells in the local surgical area, please ask this instrument's manufacturing company about more information on this option. 

最好的消息是就只要5分钟的手术就可以夺回目前治疗技术下一个月的失地，重症进行性病人也可以在手术隔夜后恢复一个月前的状态。这是能让老年痴呆的病人在经济上身体上都可以每天承受的一种手术技术，这项技术如此可承受是其所有参与研发人员的骄傲。

这是一种和癌症新治疗技术一样或者类似的手术设备，技术的更新是在如何选择保留手术区域的细胞，请向手术设备的制造商查询该选项手术技术的详细信息。

----(All the important information about new Alzheimer treatment is in above section)----

How I stick my neck into this proud of this new treatment technology for Alzheimer? It already has been such an anger to a lot of devoted cancer treatment researchers that I contributed curing cancer by suggesting conduct "several times of Hemodialysis after each surgery" to prevent spreading, how about this time?

Well, that suggestion of "at least three times of Hemodialysis after each surgery" is based on the medical college textbook knowledge from "Organs and Tissues" that any element in a cell will penetrate into body-fluid and then further penetrate into blood which means Hemodialysis (blood filtering technology) will remove malicious elements in blood, but it takes a couple of days for malicious elements in body-fluid to penetrate into blood, and more days for malicious elements in cells to eventually penetrate into blood to be removed.

It is very unfair to a lot of devoted cancer research personnel to watch my name associated with curing cancer by this advice, but it is truly my advice that rings the bell for those frustrated cancer treatment providers about spreading prevention, "at least three times of Hemodialysis after each surgery" is absolutely needed and it is the advice. I am very proud that my textbook knowledge serves well in this curing cancer contribution.

This time, I put it very accurately as co-discover the option of how to retain biological cells in surgical local areas. Those other co-discovery persons are medical personnel, what I contributed is I advised them how to make complicated computer mouse-clicks to get the desired retaining selections, and a bit more.

I have a lot of trouble with a lot of people that I never even heard of keep yelling at me where is their own money as if I would know, which frustrated me that I kept addressing them as "Down syndromes" because they are too young to be called Alzheimer-s.

On a Sunday, I was jokingly saying I need some special attention on the "Down syndrome strip" when I went to a Walmart store in Quincy of Massachusetts, I bypassed a sign raising the awareness for Alzheimer-s. So, I was corrected that my attention should be directed to "Alzheimer strip" because my concern is not because of birth-defect. So, today which is the next Sunday, I have this article on my blog spreading the happy news of curing Alzheimer, and I will celebrate that I successfully stick my neck into this proud of this new treatment technology for Alzheimer.


----October 21st of 2018,  a Sunday.

10-20-2018 Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention（三大纪律八项注意）

10-20-2018 Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention（三大纪律八项注意）


The difference between communism and looting should be if to share self-own or if to grab others-own. Well, if the sharing is own wife, grabbing is whoever's "any kind of wealth", no wonder I am a no-sexuality female screaming this entire time.  （共产主义和抢掠的区别似乎应该是愿意分享自己所拥有的还是只想抢别人所拥有的。不过，如果愿意分享的是自己老婆，想抢的是别人的“任何好东西”，难怪就我这个暂无性欲之女子整天在惨嚎。）

Since 1921, the Chinese communist party has been working on to differentiate communism with looting. All those Chinese riches who were lucky enough to survive in Taiwan may have complained Chinese communist party had been lootings through and through while Chinese communist party has been emphasizing “Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention（三大纪律八项注意）*” for all its members to obey since 1927 or so. （从1921年中国共产党成立，中国共产党就致力于区别什么共产主义运动以及共产主义以及与抢劫掠夺的区别是什么。那些幸运的逃到了台湾生存下来的前中国富人可能是痛骂中国当年的共产主义根本就是抢劫和掠夺，而中国共产党自1927年起就已经三令五申的强调三大纪律八项注意是铁的纪律。）

---- October 20th, 2018


Reference：

*三大纪律：

1. 一切行动听指挥；
2. 不拿群众一针一线；
3. 一切缴获要归公。

八项注意：

1. 说话和气；
2. 买卖公平；
3. 借东西要还；
4. 损坏东西要赔偿；
5. 不打人骂人；
6. 不损坏庄稼；
7. 不调戏妇女；
8. 不虐待俘虏。

（资料来源：维基百科 三大纪律八项注意）

“Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention (三大纪律八项注意）”

An alternative, more literal translation into English was presented by the People's Daily.^[2]

The Three Main Rules of Discipline:

• Obey orders in all your actions.
• Do not take a single needle or piece of thread from the masses.
• Turn in everything captured.

The Eight Points for Attention:

• Speak politely.
• Pay fairly for what you buy.
• Return everything you borrow.
• Pay for anything you damage.
• Do not hit or swear at people.
• Do not damage crops.
• Do not take liberties with women.
• Do not ill-treat captives.

(Source Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Rules_of_Discipline_and_Eight_Points_for_Attention)

10-19-2018 More about anger：Anger from the Chinese community and other communities（来自华裔社区及其他社区的愤怒）

10-19-2018 More about anger：Anger from the Chinese community and other communities（来自华裔社区及其他社区的愤怒）


Anger from the Chinese community:

1 Question： "Money ownership should be according to Laws, then why you insist on to have that money?"
My answer： I explained that I inherited some Trusts according to Laws in 2004, the explanation about those providing money was given as "upon instructions from their lawfully registered owners according to Laws". Above explanations are both according to Laws about providing money which I have insisted on to have.
（1 华裔社区问：“钱的拥有权应该是根据法律的合法所有权，那你为什么一再坚持那是你的钱？”
我的回答：我已经解释了我是按照法律在2004年继承了几个信托，有关那些生活费用给付，付款公司给予的解释是：都是根据法律注册登记上的公司合法投资拥有者的指示按照法律予以支付”。以上两点解释都是根据法律，所以我一再坚持那些生活费用给付是我的钱。）

2 Question： "If that is your money, why I don't have a share?"
My answer：My Trust-Inheriting was according to wills so that I am the sole beneficiary to all the Trusts I inherited which definitely means no one else has a single share.
（2 华裔社区问：“如果那是你的钱，为什么那里面没有我的钱？”
我的回答：我的信托继承都是按照每一个信托的遗嘱继承的每一个信托，所以我是我所继承的所有信托的唯一受益人，也就是说就没有任何其他人的任何一分钱在我所继承的所有信托里面。）

3 Question： "Sole-beneficiary and Trust-inheriting are both your own saying which not necessary means lawful saying, and I don't believe any of them."
My answer： If you have doubts on your own possible inheritable share, please believe consulting attorneys about inheriting related laws is the best choice. I can only provide some obvious tips here: My both parents were healthy alive in 2004 and providing money I stated are all originated from outside China.
（3 华裔社区问： “唯一受益人及信托继承都是你自说自话并不一定是法律上的说法，我是一个字都不会相信。”
我的回答：如果你对你自己那一份可能的继承份额有疑问，请向律师咨询继承相关法律应该是你最好的选择。我可以提供一些非常明显的真实线索：我的父母双亲在2004年时都很健康也都健在，我所宣称的我的生活费用给付都是由中华人民共和国境外地区的公司所支付提供的。）

My frustration has been: Believe my explanations or not, all these providing money is the money no other Chinese has any association with. It has been too ridiculous for so many Chinese screaming to me about where their own money is while knowing I have no financial nor social association with them.
（我的愤怒：相信不相信我所给予的解释，就没有任何华人能和所有这些我所宣称的生活费用给付搭界, 却来了一堆和我既从无金钱往来也没任何社交往来的人对着我连嘶代吼的干嚎质问他们自己的钱在那里，简直是某明奇妙至极。）

4 Question： "Why you kept on insulting so many people and the Chinese government?"
My answer： I understand the entire situation and most of my troubles are from their intentional malicious efforts, so my answer-statement should be: I have been returning their "courtesy" as my own care-free expression, just my learning experiences of being my own way of witty smart.
（4 华裔社区问：“你为什么老是羞辱挑衅那么多人以及中国政府？”
我的回答：我认为整起事件以及我所有的麻烦都是由这些人及中国政府一些人明知真相而恶意胡言故意所为所造成的，所以我的回答应该是：我也就是在用着同样的毫不在乎地态度对他们所做的一切礼尚往来而已，就当练习练习我自已独特风格的“机智对应聪敏利齿”吧。）

----October 19th, 2018


Anger from other Communities（来自其他社区的愤怒）:

Question："You can't keep claiming other people's wealth to be yours to own!"
My answer：I claimed I am the sole beneficiary person of some Trusts I inherited. The confusion of these paying companies' lawful ownership is beyond my knowledge as a beneficiary person whose Trusts may have invested in these paying companies. Please consult those paying companies regarding your confusion about their lawful ownership, and please consult attorneys regarding your confusion about what Trust-Inheriting or sole beneficiary person is.

My confusion about one American company in 2016 has been corrected as that American company is 100% solely owned by its lawfully registered investor which is the British East India Company's British Financier.

(其他社区问：“你不能老是把别人的财产宣布成你自己的!"
我的回答：我宣称的是：我是我所继承信托的唯一受益人。至于那些向我支付生活费用的公司的法律所有权困绕，我的那些信托可能有投资在这些公司里，但这些公司的法律所有权并不是我作为这些信托的受益人可能会知道的信息。如果你对于这些付款公司的法律所有权有困扰，请向这些付款公司咨询；如果你对什么是信托继承及什么是唯一受益人有困绕，请向律师公司咨询。

至于我2016年时对一家美国公司法律所有权的困扰，我已经纠正了我的说法，其正确说法是：这家美国公司是100%由其合法注册的投资者英国公司所独家拥有，该英国公司是著名的英国东印度公司的主要英国投资公司。

----October 19th, 2018

10-18-2018 The anger from cousins and friendly (方家亲戚以及一些友好人士的愤怒）

10-18-2018 The anger from cousins and friendly (方家亲戚以及一些友好人士的愤怒）


From my cousins（亲戚的愤怒）:

1: Their family seniors were not cared for by me the same way as I cared for my parents.
My answer: My parents' marriage family is the poorest among my father-side relatives. In 2004, the understanding of my parents' health care was good health-insurance and some retirement pension which were both affordable to my father side relatives' own finance. In the meeting, the decision was they buy their insurances in China, and I gave them the gift of over $80Million in U.S. dollar in years later which would be around 2014 or 2015. They still have not received the gifts is beyond my control.
1：他们家的老人没有被我想我自己父母一样照顾着.
我的回答：我父母的婚姻家庭是我父系亲戚里最穷的一个。2004年，我给我父母所做的安排，当时的理解就是一个好的医疗保险及一份普通的退休工资，这些在当时就是我父系亲戚们自己就有也买得起的。在会上当时提到的就是，他们自己在中国买保险，我在2014或者2015年左右给他们一家一份超过8千万美金的礼物（即五亿人民币）。他们至今没有收到礼物是因为事件发展不在我的掌控之中。

My anger is I only receive a Trust of $15Million in 1948, and I gave them each over $80 Million which is 5 times of the total of the year 1948's size for each, why it is ridiculous for them to buy their own insurance for the time being? All either can afford to have good one or having good company-offered insurance, either small business owner (“个体户”自己做生意) or college graduated having a good retirement.
我的愤怒是：我继承的信托在1948年设立时就只有一千五百万美金（五百万大洋），而我2004年愿意给他们的是每家超过八千万美金（即五亿人民币）的一份礼物，他们自己付钱买一份他们买的起的保险怎么就变成离谱了？他们所有的人都是要么做“个体户”自己做生意已经好多年了，要么大学毕业有一份很好的公费医疗退休金。

Those Trusts I inherited were from my father-side grandfathers,  my mother side relatives are not who I owe which is not to say they are not my relatives,  other than my mother's eldest sister who had been nice to me before her own child-adoption which was when I was 12 years old. Her relentless fierce efforts after her own adoption to make her own home a clearly-owned place to her own adopted daughter had already pushed me very clearly in my own parents' place only, her husband passed away before 2004. So, as I stated early in my blog, as long as she had what she needed when she was sick, I am comfortable not being the one who should be around and I don't owe her family more than this because of her and her family's attitude towards my mother. My mother worked her food as a maid when she grew up in her eldest sister's place since my mother was 11 years old, but my mother was never a doomed-maid person to her eldest sister, nor to her eldest sister's family".
（我妈妈那边的亲戚，除了我妈妈的大姐，我是谁也没欠，这不是在说他们不是亲戚，而是说我继承的是我父系爷爷们给我的礼物。我妈妈的大姐在我十一二岁左右她领养她自己的小孩以前对我非常好。她领养了自己的小孩以后就坚持用各种方式强调她自己的家是她自己所领养的小孩所拥有的，她这份持续不懈的努力早就让我非常非常地清楚我父母的家才是我唯一的家，她丈夫是在2004年以前就去世了。所以，就像我曾经在我博文里曾经提到的，在我妈的大姐生病去世之前，她可以收到所需要的公费医疗以外的医疗以其他照顾，我就很自在，我不觉得我是应该需要亲身照顾陪伴她的那一个，我也不觉得我亏欠她家里比这更多就因为他们一家对我母亲的态度。我的母亲从十一二岁起是在她的这个大姐家里长大的直到我父母结婚，我妈妈必须协助独立操持家务才能有口饭吃是我妈妈自己的认知，那些家务事做得动做不动都是她必须做的是我妈妈告诉我的她的成长经历，我认为我妈妈是做工挣得她自己的成长伙食费，对我妈妈的大姐及我妈妈大姐的家庭来说，我妈妈并不应该被认为是他们家里一个“永远都改变不了地位的”的低贱保姆而已。）

2: Why I refuse to give them that "over $80Million in U.S. dollars" in 2004.
My answer: That is a gift, not I owe. I do have the privilege to decide when and how to gift. I have the concern that they would get into some trouble that already existed in that meeting which was so many ridiculous demands to have some money.
（2：为什么我拒绝在2004年就送给他们这每家超过80万美金的礼物。
我的回答：那是礼物不是欠债，我愿意什么时候给怎么给就什么时候给怎么给。我当时就是担心他们卷入当时在会上就已经存在的一堆某明奇妙的要钱要求。）

I said in that meeting I have this gift allocated for my father's siblings and my grandfather's siblings because they were relatives to me and my father, and I asked them to try not to get involved with those who don't have this kind of gift from me. Those are the people I never owe a bit. All these noises you heard that they deserve to have some money were in that meeting to bilk and fiercely demand money already, all behaved as if I owe them. They are the people I never even heard of till they harmed me, I never owed them a penny and I never owed them any kindness that ever from them. Why would I ever reward those people I never even heard of just because they dare to harm for money or they dare to bilk for money?
（我当时已经说了，我有这每家一份给我父亲弟妹及我爷爷弟妹的礼物准备好了也特别安置好了，我让他们尽量别卷入那些没有这份类似礼物的人的吵闹不休。我没欠了那些人的。你们现在能听到的就是应该拿钱的吵闹声在2004年7月1日那天就有，不停的在那儿不是讹就是诈，都是一副我欠了他们似的。而在他们伤害我之前，我根本就没听说过他们，更没欠他们一分一厘的钱债，也没欠他们一丝一毫的人情债。我为什么要奖励他们就是敢伤害我就是一定要钱反正不是讹就是诈的这份努力？）

My anger towards my father side cousins is why they can't consult laws to know that "over $80Million" is never what I owe but a gift.
（我对我父系的亲戚的愤怒就是：他们为什么不做法律咨询以了解我从来没有欠了他们的，就只是在送礼而已。）


From friendly（友好人士的愤怒）:

They have been friendly to me without any expectation as conditions, but why I disappreciate them as such?
My answer: Never my intention but the reason I have called for laws' help.

Since 2004 which was soon after July 1st of 2004 if not immediately after the meeting, the enormous efforts I complained to laws about have been "who hates me or who is willing to harm me should deserve anything I lawfully own, and only negativenesses can be allowed to reach to those who have once been nice and friendly to me". I have complained to laws since 2015 when I myself has become a clear victim of this obvious hate crime.

他们对我友善从未有过附加条件也没有过什么不切实际的幻想，但我为什么对他们如此不稀罕？
我的回答：这不是我的本意而是我报警的原因。
这是从2004年就开始甚至是从2004年7月1日开完会就立即开始的，我向法律所投诉的就是：有这么很大的一份努力就是要表达：“仇恨我的人就应该得到我所拥有的，对我友善的就只配没好事”。我是从2015年当我自己已经明显成为这种仇恨犯罪的受害者时就已经报警了。

----October 13th, 2018

10-17-2018 "She really has money" is so exciting for a lot of people, but because of whom? ("她真的有钱“对很多人来说太激动了，可究竟为谁激动？）

10-17-2018 "She really has money" is so exciting for a lot of people, but because of whom? ("她真的有钱“对很多人来说太激动了，可究竟因为谁激动？）

I am happy to hear that Trusts set up for me by five of my near grandfathers (including my father's father) have been validated, and also my family tree. I am a 6th-outside cousin to the wife who I "never heard of".（听说离我最近的五代爷爷（包括我父亲的父亲）替我设立的信托被证实了，还有我家的族谱， 我还真是挺高兴的。原来我和那个做老婆，也就是我说“从未听说过的”那个，还真是6等亲以外的族亲。估计她和我爷爷是一辈的，要是五等亲以内，我估计就得叫她姑奶奶的。）

I heard of several cousins confusion about "a share", they are my at least 6-cousin outside as well (not the same direction to the wife). That is the thing has agitated me that we are, at least, the eighth generation from the grandfather we share and we are never associated, how can they be confused so much compare to my much closer cousins? A lot of my troubles are from this morning's revealed confusion or even more ridiculous confusion. The example: You can hear loud cheers whenever I have money validated, but all these happiness has nothing to do with me somehow. I know my inheriting is handsome since 2004 so that I stay in calm, but all these excitement are not because of me either. So, because of whom? （我也听说了几个堂亲的”应该有一份”的困扰，他们和我至少是6等亲以外（和那个做老婆的“6等亲”从三维立体上来说不是一个方向）。就是这个“应该有一份”让我烦的不行，我们共一个爷爷至少是8代以前的事了，我们又从无交往，他们怎么困扰的如此剧烈，比那些和我近亲一点的还激烈太多？我很多的抱怨就是因为今天早上提到的这份困扰，还有比这更奇怪的困扰。举个例子：只要听说我有钱是真实被证实了，感觉就能听到那是一片的欢呼，但好像不是在为我欢呼。我是从2004年就已经知道我信托的规模挺大的，所以现在我听到这些消息可以很平静，但其他人的这份激动也都不是因为我很有钱而激动着。因为谁有钱而激动啊？）

----October 17th, 2018

10-16-2018 伟哥的智慧产权 （Viagra's Intellectual Income confusion)

10-16-2018 伟哥的智慧产权 （Viagra's Intellectual Income confusion)


听说了今天早上伟哥的智慧产权的“Done deal"让很多华人不太明白，也听说了今天早上已经提到，是付款的药业公司和真正收到钱的人做的“就这样了”这句中文翻译造成的困扰。我也就只做一个小小的解读提示：这两个人中间还有个一个因为智慧产权人员收款手续不完备而无法向智慧产权人员付款的律师公司，该律师公司不知为何却把钱给了这个今天早上提到的真正收到钱的人，所以这两个“就这样了”，不一定是同一个具体细节。(About "done deal" this morning, I heard it was from both recipient of the money and evaluating management. So, the decoding reference is: there is a law firm got stuck in between who supposed to hold this money till the confusion resolved, but somehow this law firm gave this money to this morning's recipient instead is the argument. So, the "done deal" may not mean the same meaning. )

我听着这事情的经过大概是：药业公司因为某些原因无法寄出该智慧产权的通知领取函（挂号信），或者因为某些原因该挂号信寄出后，智慧产权人员没有收到，该律师公司因为没有收到应由药业公司给与的该通知领取函的挂号信回执而无法确定付款手续是否完备，所以不能付款，是造成目前状态的原因。(From what I gathered, either the company can't mail out the certified letter for some reason, or the mailed out letter has not been received, that the law firm has not received the certified letter receipt from the company is the reason that the law firm can't start the paying process which is the confusion that needs to be resolved.)

----October 16th, 2018

10-15-2018 Is private assistant's family a Down syndrome family(私人助理那一家子是不是都是唐氏综合症病人啊？）

10-15-2018 Is private assistant's family a Down syndrome family(私人助理那一家子是不是都是唐氏综合症病人啊？）


First, about the other day's blog article(10-12-2018 Spoiled females), I echo what has been clarified this morning that I mistook the husband as a friendly figure from one of the 2004's meetings I participated. Also, this morning's broadcasting clarified that the wife's maiden family name has the record that can be traced back to over 800 years ago which indicates clearly they do not any association with me, and I agree this certainly means we don't share blood at least for this 800 years. （先澄清10月12日博文所提到的，我错以为做丈夫的是和我在2004年会议上有过友善交谈的一位，还有做妻子的提到他娘家的800年族谱和我一点关系都没有，我同意这证明，虽然都姓方，但至少这800年是一点血缘关系都没有。）

Also, the Li's Family mentioned in this morning's broadcasting is actually a Li's Cluster in the People's Republic of China, this is the same family I referred to as the Stamped heir family. Their family's last name is Li which of course the reason made them the Li's clan. I called them the stamped heir cluster because, according to the rumors I hear, they claimed they are the heir of Tang dynasty only because they have a stamped letter stated so from the 1950s, by the People's Republic of China's government which was formed in 1949, based on the signatures collected by Wang Zhen (王震). I heard they have absolutely nothing to do with Hongkong's very famous Li's Family Trust. (有关李氏宗亲，今天早上提到的李氏宗亲其实是中国大陆一家姓李的，就是我说公章继承人的那个李家。他们一家都是姓李的，当然就是李氏宗亲了。我说他们是公章继承人，是因为我听说他们自称是唐朝皇帝的继承人就凭着一张纸，而那张纸是由1949年才成立的中华人民共和国政府在1950年代左右根据王震所收集的群众签名而出具的。我听说他们和香港很有名的一家公司“李家信托”一点关系都没有。）

And, the question of why my grandfather's former private assistant's family has been so stubborn about having a saying over me? When the private assistant was hired in 1949, my father already joined the Chinese Army and left Shanghai ever since, which is the fact already made the private assistant and his family a never associated cluster to my father's marriage family that I born into. As I stated, I had spent five years in the Shanghai First Medical College, I never even heard of this private assistant nor his family at all that entire time. Why, all of sudden, this private assistant that my grandfather had hired as a footman became such a voice of my matter? The secret? It is because one of the daughters-in-law is in Shanghai radio company. So, I refuse this "voice involving into" my any matter. （还有，就是我爷爷以前雇佣的专门为他跑腿的私人助理一家子怎么就是够资格一定要对我的事情指手画脚的？1949年这个私人助理被我爷爷聘用时，我父亲已经参军从此离开了上海，这就已经是我所出生的我父亲婚姻家庭和私人助理一家没有任何交往关系的事实证据了；就像我自己讲的，我在上海第一医学院读了5年，这5年我人就在上海就是从来没听说过这私人助理一家子。怎么，忽然之间，以前替我爷爷跑跑腿的一家现在就可以亮着嗓子对我所有事情都指手画脚的啦？秘密?因为他们家有一房媳妇是上海的广播电台系统的。这样，我就只好公开表态我拒绝他们这种‘声音介入干涉”我的任何事物。）

I heard this private assistant's family has this weird understanding they are taking care matters on behave of the "$10,000 monthly payment story" company to dis-eligible me to have any association with that company to spin me out, this is one of the reasons I questioned if they have the Down syndrome which certainly implies my doubts if they are the born-stupid. If you can have the opportunity to listen to their logic,  I say you pretty much can get all the reasons why I asked if they have the Down syndrome. （我听说这个私人助理一家有一种奇怪的理解，他们是在帮助那个每月汇款一万美元的那家公司来处理我让我以后再也不够资格和这家美国公司有任何搭界的地方，也就是他们这样做的结果就可以把我给甩出去了。这是我一直在问这私人助理一家是不是唐氏综合症的原因，当然这意思也就是他们一家是不是都是一群天生的痴呆症患者啊？如果你有机会和他们聊一聊，听听他们说话的逻辑思维，你可能就知道了我为什么问他们一家是不是都是痴呆的所有可能的原因。）

Ever since I heard of this family in this past March or April, I have experienced a lot of surprises how extraordinary their understanding of the matters can be. If you have read my articles about my grandmother, well, that is necessary I have to do based on their broadcasting on Shanghai radio, according to rumors I heard of which says "they are the children fathered by my grandmother's most beloved man and mothered by the relative of my grandfather's most beloved female, so they are the true beloved children to my grandfather's money, that they deserve to own any money I inherited." Will anyone in my shoes doubts if they are the Down syndrome family? So, you heard this morning's emphasis on deep creese on palms as the response from them. （自从我从今年的三四月份开始听说了这一家人，我是一次次经历了他们家对于各种事物的理解如此独特离奇的惊诧和惊恐。如果你有看过我博文里对我奶奶的语言表达，那是因为我听说了他们是如何在上海的广播里谈论我奶奶的， 大意就是：“他们这一族是我奶奶最心爱的男人和我爷爷最心爱的女人的亲戚所生出来的孩子，所以他们才是我爷爷的财产最真爱的孩子们，所以我作为我爷爷奶奶的亲生孙女，我所继承的所有财产应该就是被他们拥有才对。”你要是我的话，你会不会认认真真问一问他们一家是不是都是天生痴呆啊？所以，你们如果听到的今天早上的播出内容，你们就是听到了他们一家对我如此问题的回应也就是对于"横贯掌”的一再强调。）

----October 15th, 2018


This morning's Down syndrome sparks a lot of hush, hush on what is this "a single deep crease across the center of the palm" as a major symptom of the Down syndrome, so I publish the reason of these hush-hush here, and some copied photos from Wikipedia and pasted below.

(my both palms definitely not a Down syndrome)

----October 15th, 2018


Down Syndrome:




(source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transverse_palmar_crease )


"A few of the common physical traits of Down syndrome are low muscle tone, small stature, an upward slant to the eyes, and a single deep crease across the center of the palm – although each person with Down syndrome is a unique individual and may possess these characteristics to different degrees, or not at all".(source: https://www.ndss.org/about-down-syndrome/down-syndrome/)

"Males are twice as likely as females to have this characteristic, and it tends to run in families. In its non-symptomatic form, it is more common among Asians and Native Americans than among other populations, and in some families, there is a tendency to inherit the condition unilaterally; that is, on one hand only." source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transverse_palmar_crease )

Useful link to know more about what is Down Syndrome  National Down Syndrome Society website


----October 15th, 2018

10-14-2018 Why it is Trust-Inheriting instead of Family Inheriting?（为什么是信托继承而不是分家产继承？）

10-14-2018 Why it is Trust-Inheriting instead of Family Inheriting?（为什么是信托继承而不是分家产继承？）


A lot of anger expressed through these couple of weeks' broadcasting is the anger why everyone supports me to "choose Trust-Inheriting over Family Inheriting"?（这两个星期所表达的愤怒都和为什么这么多人都支持我选择信托继承而不按照分家产继承来谈这些钱的法律归属。）

This has been ridiculous to everyone who knows that Trust laws have been applicable for 1000 years but a true question to those who never heard of it. My father-side family has the tradition of setting up a Trust for each under-age son in family inheriting since ancient that Trust-Inheriting is never unheard of in China, but not to everyone as well.（这种愤怒对很多知道信托法已经存在有1000年的人来说实在是无稽直至， 但对很多人从未听说过信托法历史的人来说确实是他们不明白的地方。我爷爷家里自古就有替每一个年幼尚未成年的儿子在分家产时办一份信托，等他们成年后再提取现金的传统，所以中国也是自古就有信托存在，但也不是每一个人都很清楚。）

No one can choose how to inherit because inheriting has been regulated according to laws since ancient time, to if receive wealth from the deceased should be because of either blood or the will is a very common knowledge to most of the people, another aspect related to inheriting is often ignored which is how to receive the wealth from the deceased.（没人可以选择继承的方式，因为自古以来，如何继承财产就已经是由法律所规范的而非个人可以选择的，是否可以从一个去世的人那里继承到财产是由血原关系或者死者的遗嘱所决定的是很多人都知道的常识，但另一个和继承有关的方面却被大多数人所忽视了，就是这死者财产的法律归属是如何从死者名下转入继承者名下的。）

The ownership transferred from the deceased directly to the living, by blood or by will, is the family-inheriting. The ownership transferred from the deceased to the intended recipient through a third party is the Trust-Inheriting.（财产的法律所有权从死者名下直接转入继承者名下的，凭血原关系或者遗嘱继承，都属于分家产继承。如果这财产的法律所有权是从死者名下通过第三方再转入继承者名下的就是信托继承。）

In detail, my Trust-inheriting as an example, my grandfather transferred some money out of his name to "Female palm（女掌)" when he was a living person but I was not born yet, so he asked a third party(attorney) to set up a Trust look after this money he gave to "female palm", so the ownership of this money transferred to the sole beneficiary person "female palm" of the Trust and would be taken care of by this attorney. （具体来说，以我自己的信托继承为例子，我爷爷在他自己还活着时就将他自己的钱转入了“女掌”的名下，但我那时还没有生，所以我爷爷就找了一个律师设立了一个信托来照看这笔他给了“女掌”的钱，所以这笔钱就此从我爷爷的名下转入了该信托的唯一受益人“女掌”的名下并由该律师负责照看。）

So, this money is no longer my grandfather's money once this Trust set up, but owned by the "female palm" who is the sole beneficiary of this Trust. Who should be this female palm and how this female palm can have this money transferred into this female palm's legal government-registry name are all specified in my grandfather's letter(Trust-settler's letter) of how to set up this Trust.（所以说，在这信托设立以后，这笔钱就不再是我爷爷所拥有的了，而是由该信托的唯一受益人“女掌”所合法拥有。谁才是此“女掌”以及该“女掌”如何才能将这笔钱转入该“女掌”的户籍注册名下，都是我爷爷在设立该信托时就已经在其“信托设立人委托书”里就已经规定了的。）

In my grandfather's settler's letter, he specified the female palm should be a girl born from his eldest son Fang, Wenhai (方文海) who also would share his family birthmark as the attached illustration. In 1967, I was born as Fang, Wenhai's lawful and biological daughter who shares my father Fang, Wenhai's and my grandfather's birthmark exactly as that attached illustration in my grandfather's settler's letter. （在我爷爷的“信托设立人委托书”，我爷爷制定了该女掌是其长子方文海所生的女儿，这个女儿有和他自己一样的掌纹（附有掌纹图）。我是1967年出生，是方文海的婚姻所出的亲生女儿，有着和我父亲方文海及我爷爷一模一样的胎记掌纹，就如我爷爷的“信托设立人委托书”的附图所示。）

So, the money of the Trust my grandfather set up in Hong Kong has been my money since 1948, this money was transferred to my legal government-registry name Min Fang (方敏）in 2004 after my inheriting. （所以，这笔钱从1948年我爷爷替我在香港设立信托开始就已经是我的钱了，这笔钱的法律所有权在2004年我继承后转入我的户籍注册名方敏的名下。）

----October 14th, 2018


Anger from the cousin who was presented on July 1st of 2004 why he was not even asked?(2004年7月1日在场的那个亲戚的愤怒"当时明知他在场，却连问都没问他一声。”）

My response: （我的回应:)

Who should ask him about what? (谁需要就什么问题询问他的意见？）

Money was given by my grandfather, the attorney was hired by my grandfather as well, never his mother (one of my father's younger sister) nor himself. The attorney did not need his permission to fulfill my grandfather's entrusting, I don't need his permission to transfer that money into my lawful registry name, why anyone needs to ask him? Plus, inheriting was the day before.（这钱是我爷爷给我的，律师是我爷爷聘请的，从来不是他妈妈的(我爸爸的一个妹妹）更不是他本人的钱。我爷爷聘用的律师不需要他的授权来执行我爷爷的嘱托，我也不需要他的批准才能把钱转入我自己的户籍注册名。谁需要问问他的意见？何况继承是前一天的事。）

He did ask if he has a share in it and he got the "Nope" answer very politely.（他是有问他是不是也有继承份额，他当时就已经听到“没有”的回答啦，回答的态度是非常客气也非常礼貌的。）

I have some anger as well. When my father did not get a penny in 1965's handsome family-inheriting, none of his siblings felt sorry for my father, no comforting for that from them at all, no comforting gift when my father got married nor when his firstborn was born. My mother married a man who only had an empty employee dorm room with a lot of carton boxes has been my family story. All their tones have been "It is the father(my grandfather) who does not willing to give, it is not their fault and it is absolutely none of their business". My father never blames them nor educates us to blame them as his marriage family. （我也是一腔的愤怒。当我父亲在我爷爷1965年去世分家产时一个子都没有分到，他们是一人一万元人民币。我爸爸的三个弟妹就没有觉得我父亲蛮惨的，当时没有安慰一下，我父亲结婚时也没有，我父亲的第一个孩子出生时也没有。我母亲嫁给我父亲时，我父亲就只有一件空空的员工宿舍房间加上几个纸箱子， 这是当时的街坊邻居都知道的我父母婚姻故事。他们态度始终都是“这是做父亲的（我爷爷）不想给，又不是他们的错，管他们什么事。”我父亲从来就没怪过他弟妹一句，更没教育我们这些他自己的婚姻家庭成员去指责他弟妹。）

When I inherited money in 2004 from the same person (my grandfather), I actually gifted them handsomely and they actually have been educating everybody to blame me. What the suck is this?（我2004年继承的是同一个人（我爷爷）给的钱，我还有送一份不薄的礼物给他们，他们居然还到处教育别人来一起指责我。这他妈的算什么事？）

----October 14th, 2018

10-13-2018 This morning's mountain man has enabled a Chinese actress to have a "same size marriage" to the richest Malaysia man (是今天早上播出的那个山上男人让演员胡静以同等财富规模“平嫁”了她的马拉西亚特级富豪丈夫）

10-13-2018 This morning's mountain man has enabled a Chinese actress to have a "same size marriage" to the richest Malaysia man 

This morning's mountain man's story can be very scary if his wife is a 1980PRC style talker.

That mountain man Ford, according to rumors, has once dated a Chinese actress Hu, Jing（演员胡静) for a couple of weeks (even that is "only") is possibly the reason why Hujing(胡静) is the so jealous voice against who he is to all these Chinese rumors or speculations as you heard this morning. Hujing's（胡静) weird understanding that a richest Mr. Rockefeller's underwear payment for a couple of nights can eligible a female to be a Mrs. Ford to a richest Mr. Ford with the understanding of "she is the same rich", is possibly from her own experience of "not married into rich" to a Malaysia richest guy according to rumors.

As Ford's houses keep announcing I have nothing to do with them, it should be my pleasure to imagine how the major Ford Houses would be like currently if they read my blog. Well, Fords are all so happy to listen to a Rockefeller's woman's underwear power because of the huge rich Rockefeller wallet all these time when I have been the victim, well, this is all Fords' good fortune turn to know how rich a Rockefeller's underwear payment can be. This entire time, some Fords' wives have been in the producing efforts to practice their underwear power as well, just not so powerful.

----October 13th, 2018


就是今天早上播出的那个山上男人让演员胡静可以同等财富规模“平嫁”了她的马拉西亚特级富豪丈夫

今天早上所播出的那个山上的男人，他的那个孩子妈妻子要是个中国80年代风格的说话风格，那是一字一句都吓人。

那个山上的男人福特据说以前和中国大陆的电影演员胡静谈过恋爱（虽然"就只有"一两个星期），但胡静就是听不得华人圈里对这个山上的男人福特究竟是谁的种种传闻，据说闹吃醋闹得很凶， 今天早上就是她。特级富裕的一个洛克菲勒豪迈付给女人的裤裆钱（虽然“就只”一两次裤裆关系），居然可以让一个什么都不是的女人可以风光嫁给最富的那一个福特当上个福特夫人还居然“不是嫁入了豪门”，胡静的这种理解，据说是因为她自己的亲身经历，据说胡静自己就是因为和这个山上的福特睡了一两个星期（虽然"就只有"一两个星期），据说拿到的钱就可以让她风风光光的以同等财富规模之资格“平嫁”给了她那个据说还是马拉西亚特级首富的特级富豪丈夫。

福特家整天宣布我是和他们一点关系都没有的，所以我是非常“幸灾乐祸”的快乐想象这几个最大的福特家里要是读到我的博客会是什么样的震撼，什么样的难以言喻之心情。我可是心情舒坦的多了，当那些洛克菲勒家的女人豪气冲天就凭着洛克菲勒有个超级特大的钱包，让我成为他们“裤裆能力就是商业政治运作管理的能力”的受害者时，福特家里可是各个笑得开心呢，今天总算轮到我笑得咯咯了。这可是所有的福特们最大的福气可以领教一下洛克菲勒家里给出来的裤裆钱有多丰厚了。据说福特家有几个女人一直也都在参与广播剧的制作以施展“裤裆能力就是商业政治运作管理的能力”，就是没那么实力雄厚。

----2018年10月13日

10-12-2018 Spoiled females

10-12-2018 Spoiled females


1: If I heard of a spoiled wife story as this moring's broadcasting story, will I feel bad for the husband?

Never. It is the husband's preference to choose his marriage and his lawful right to live his preferenced marriage is protected by the U.S. laws. If the husband is enlisted personnel, well, I will be privileged if I can hear the updates after his retirement. 

Will I feel bad for his adult children? Well, in the United States, "his adult children" as introduction already says the father already have raised them properly, and I should not feel bad about children because of their father's preferenced romance life.

As a female, I should feel jealous about the wife if I fancy the husband's romance but my romance preference is a never-married man which already made me so famous for since 2004, that I am certain I won't let myself in that jealous situation.

So, if the wife came forward to self-introduce herself to me as a cousin to me or my grandfather, what will I do? My answer will be a definitely true statement "never heard of you", but I will be hearty-welcoming her if she introduces who her husband is.

Is that means we can be best friends forever? It is so hard to say because we both have obviously well-spoiled characters so that we may not willing to compromise a bit mutually. 

Will I welcome the father's adult children heartily? Of course, same heartily.

----October 12th, 2018

2: Will I refuse to bow to a spoiled wife if I want to be a friend to the husband?
Well, as a friend, I do have the option to choose to stay clear from a friend's marriage or his family but stay in touch with the friend.

If the husband's not willing to let me have that option, what will I do? I would definitely choose to live my life the way I myself prefer. So, I certainly would just move on and move out of this friend's radar completely.

----October 12th, 2018

3: Somehow, I have been expected to be a spoiling figure to my classmates' children.
I can imagine it will be if I can spoil their financial fantasy better than their parents. Well, my children are much younger than all my classmates', and I am not the one learned to be a parent figure by raising my children.

So, even if I am getting along with some of them or all of them, and willing to listen and satisfy their girly or boyishly wild wishes if I can, I won't be the spoiling aunt to them. I am too girly is a true statement that I most likely would be very impressively as if the same generation girly with them.

My Trusts' business investment already have contributed to the charity-related professionally, my donation shares are in there as well. So, once I can regularly receive my monthly daily-living providing, I have considered using 5% (hard bar) of it to privately gift my own friends and my relatives, not the general public, not as if I owe. I myself will be the contact person and I will let everybody know how to contact me once I have the regular monthly providing.

----October 12th, 2018

10-11-2018 About rumored $500,000 daily spending on me && 为什么是我一个人的钱？

10-11-2018 About rumored $500,000 daily spending on me && 为什么是我一个人的钱？


I heard rumor for some time that some R's women so angry that why this Mr. R willing to spend such a big amount on me daily, no matter how I disappreciate this name on my web blog.

Well, first of all, this rumored $500,000 dollars a day spending is the donation to some special program that needs funding support, my name has been associated with this daily donation has been because the donator has been so pissed off about why his name can't get rid of stories with my name in it. So, he donates this $500,000 daily to support that special program with a condition that whoever sees this donation needs to know that I have nothing to do with his family name as well. So, I express myself to that special program's supervision group that I won't complain about truth been told, but no matter how everyone cares about that special program, I can't be a victim of any sort of harassment because of this donation associated.

Also, I heard rumors that the Mr. Senior R has been the subject being complained about for his overspending and so unnecessary spending by his relatives. I heard it is out of the efforts to take some from that donated money and transfer some into their own names. Well, it is purely their family matters that I have nothing do with, I just can't be a victim of harassment as if I am the recipient of that donation.

Another rumor I heard, every David R has heard a rumor that himself is the person who has been spending my $500,000 daily. Well, if together with that rumor of spending $500, 000 daily on me would make this a mutual same-amount spending rumor that nobody needs to do anything about other than being pissed off, right? but why? So, I assumed the "customary" 20% buyer-back 回扣(pron: huikou) related to my $500,000 daily spending rumor is what I should have the panic about where this money would come from?

----October 11th, 2018


我也是经常抱怨不知哪儿冒出来的人不准我花钱，现在好多了。听听都是些什么原因：

1：我有钱可以花了，那他们的钱在那里。他们不是在问我要我的钱，他们是在问我他们自己的钱在那里。还连哭带喊得。
我是经常被气到半死。我根本就不认识他们，也从未听说过他们，更没见过他们的钱，他们根本是在一口一声说我偷了他们的钱。我有时气急了就会回答说“一定是藏在你自己的肛门里被你自己给忘记了。那可都是黄金万两。”


2：“你凭什么说那是你的钱”？以及“你凭什么说那是你一个人的钱？”

2-1： 这句话冷静点的问法就是“为什说那是你的钱？”“为什么那是你一个人的钱而不是方家后人公共的钱？”，确实是所有方家后人一定会问的问题。

我所继承的都是信托都是按照遗嘱继承，我在遗嘱上的名字是“女掌”。每一份都按遗嘱，每一个遗嘱都附有掌纹胎记的画像。信托究竟如何规定的确实不是由我决定的，而是在信托设立时就已经书写立在了遗嘱里的。方家后人如有问题，请就继承法和信托法向你自己的律师咨询。

信托继承和一般遗嘱继承的区别就是这些所继承钱财都是早就已经不在那个已经去世的给钱的家里老人的名下，而是这个家里老人在去世前办理了该信托后就已经转入了老人所指定的该信托唯一受益人“女掌”的名下。在我2004年继承后就转入我户籍注册名字"方敏"的名下，每一笔信托都是如此，所以所有这些信托都不是方家后人共同的钱财而是我方敏一个人的。

*女掌是我爷爷们给我起的名字（信托注册名），方敏是我父亲方文海给我起的名字（户籍注册名）。----2018年10月12日更新。

----2018年10月11日。


2-2： 我所继承的不是“芝麻芝麻开开门”，不是什么海盗藏在某个山洞里的金银珠宝在2004年被发现了我连腰都不弯一下就捡到的钱，而是一直都有人在管理的家里已经去世的老人特意留给我的礼物钱， 从来不是什么不知是谁丢在荒地上的钱袋子被发现了所以只要听说了有钱就都应该分一份的。

这些钱更不是美国有钱男人给的性交费，所以不是什么比比谁才是该男人如今最爱就应该够资格拿走的。

2-3： 我曾祖母是自1930年开始就已经寡居，她寡居期间的私人恋爱生活传言是否真实都是与我无关。

听说我爷爷方智仁去世前已经被告知一些传言，在DNA鉴定不普及的1965年，我爷爷方智仁已经就他所听到的传言做了恰当处理。所有一切都与我及方智仁给我的信托无关。
1989年时是否是灵异，即是否是已去世的方智仁在表达对他自己亲生孩子婚姻的担心，我不清楚。我知我父亲兄弟二人的婚姻因为稳定都未被提及，但他好像很关心我是否知道他也有给我一份丰厚的礼物（就是在中国香港投资的那个信托，其他的当时说的是“世界各地”）。

我所有爷爷奶奶的私人生活都与我本人及我继承的信托没有任何关系。

----2018年10月11日。

10-09-2018 Decoding references （中文附后）

10-09-2018 Decoding references （中文附后）


1: What is city-watch? Citywatch is the crime-alerting program conducted through high-tech cameras to keep an eye on all streets located in Massachusetts for any given seconds. Citywatch people are police officers who sit in front of tons of same-time camera images of the Massachusetts streets.
(should be similar to this link: http://www.aberdeen.sd.us/437/CityWatch)

2: My inheriting day was June 30th of 2004. I became a resident of Boston, Massachusetts since August of 2004. My appearance has impacted a lot because of glasshouse cancer treatment but in process of recovering.

3: My Trust-inheriting is a private matter and lawfully valid is the reason that I have been provided for lawfully, I have not received providing to cover my daily living expenses is because of some confusions regarding my Trusts' business investment.

4: Any confusion regarding the ownership of the paying-company is the matter of laws but not the matter of explaining laws.

5: All the confusions regarding the ownership of the paying company are, actually, not from any of Rockefellers except some wives because of their maiden name, nor any of Fords except some wives because of their maiden name, and nor any of Walden except some wives because of their maiden name. But, one can imagine the husbands must be confused as well with their wives.

The frustration, how to let the younger generation of that three big names to know that no matter how many angry voices are around them, the paying company ownership confusion should not be their headache nor panic because all these confusion are their in-laws' maiden family's confusion.

So, I still need to wait a bit till some confusion clarified to receive my daily living expenses provided.

----October 9th, 2018


还有：

爸爸妈妈：如果有人建议你留下字条留下身边的钱给你所在乎的某某人然后悄悄搬家，就赶紧报警或者和我联系，并要特别注意交通安全，家里安全等等。请注意保护好自己。
我的电邮：somebodyinMA@gmail.com
我住家附近警局电话：(617) 343-4633 （把我的博客地址给他们， 我的住址：BHA 2494）
我住家附近警局的地址：1 Schroeder Plz, Boston, MA 02120.

据说加州洛杉矶及旧金山老华侨参与广播剧制作的人很多，像现在这种“只要没有人承认认识你，也没人承认知道你做过什么，你就没有了任何身份证明你是谁”就明显带有1850年左右旧金山大火后华人所经历的那份惊恐无奈痕迹，

还有，据说旧金山70年代四五百人失踪故事的受害人及造事者家属都有多人参与广播剧制作，“把钱放在桌上，话就是要讲清楚才行（而不是依照法律解决钱财纠纷）”，就是旧金山那四五百人失踪前的争执。当时据说是房东把房客的一封律师通知继承信托的邮件给扣下了然后坚持要分多少钱。据说这个广播剧的华人导演就是当时这个旧金山事件的导演者的家人。是真是假，反正小心就是。据说旧金山那些人就是给家人留一个纸条及身边所带的一点钱就这么从此失踪了，特别吓人。

----2018年10月9日。

10-08-2018 公开场合与私下场合的态度立场一定会是一致的

10-08-2018 公开场合与私下场合的态度立场一定会是一致的


有人会问中国政府是否会在私下，通过民间对我作为真实的唐太宗李世民的继承人表达友善？
我的回应；我不会相信这种猜测也不会接受这种表达，我方敏不认为让民间人士违反中国政府三令五申的立场对我表达友善是明智之举。

很简单的原因就是我方敏从未反对中国共产党对中国960万平方公里土地的统治权，我方敏也从未反对中国中央政府建设法治国家的立场和努力。我方敏更从未对中国中央及地方政府的对内对外政策评头论足。

我方敏本人也没有意愿利用在国外生活的条件从事任何间谍活动，我方敏很感激各国人民对我所继承的这些信托在各国所投资的企业所付出的所有勤奋工作，我方敏没有任何意愿伤害我方敏所选择生活安家的国家以及那些为我所继承的信托所投资的企业而勤奋工作的各国人民。

不管中国政府和我之间的矛盾究竟是什么，公开场合与私下场合的态度立场是一致。

就中国中央政府对于我方敏在美国生活20多年后居然有可能不做任何努力就可以远程干扰多名中国公民在中国土地上的婚姻恋爱自由的指责，我方敏认为存粹是出于荷尔蒙失调造成的严重花痴型性迫害幻想症。

----2018年10月8日


有中国国内人士认为我在2004年适合一些外国名人的谈话有些矫情。
我的回应：我当时已经在国外生活多年，我的谈笑尺度在国外属于社交合适范围之内。至于是否矫情，国内人士应该最清楚作为唐太宗李世民的继承人，只要是真实，对海内外华裔社区来说，谈不上是在矫情。对外族裔人士来说，就是只要我所宣布的所继承财产规模是真实的，也是谈不上是在矫情。至于和外国皇室成员的玩笑，在我既是中国皇室继承人又有丰厚财产头衔继承都是真实的情况下，也是谈不上是在矫情。也就是说说笑笑，聊完走人。

----2018年10月8日


南京有个南京汽车制造厂，上海有个飞机制造厂，所以这两地人士最清楚我不可能有小孩。
我的回应：我还是从南京汽车制造厂的“子弟中学”南京第四中学初中毕业的，可以想象究竟有多少中国人特别知道我的底细。

我再加上几条，我是曾今在纽约曼哈顿中城生活和福特家经常共用一条街边人行道，如今是在福特家投资重镇的麻州波士顿生活。开个玩笑的说法是，从波城的中国城一直到波城的大图书馆以及我现在住的房子还有我现在读MBA的学生贷款，都是和福特家的名字连在一起。海外华人当中知道这些的人太多啦。

我方敏有自己家亲生爷爷的撑腰的好处就是隔空吵起架来，你就能听到一片类似的回应：方敏现在住的这房子的房基地是方敏自己所继承的信托所投资的企业所拥有的。这是从2004年就一直如此的。

至于是否和福特家有孩子，不管是真是假，都是双方在慎重。我选择回应“不是太清楚”。

----2018年10月8日