Home

Three elements to recognize if it is an opportunity to succeed:

1) Can you understand the frustration expressed during the conversation to identify the possible causes of the frustration?

2) Can you identify if you can offer some help from your knowledge, experiences, and expertise?

3) Can you effectively communicate your expertise to be understood as possible helpful solutions?

----Min Fang, July 10th of 2019


Featured Articles

Sunday, September 30, 2018

09-30-2018 Why a glamor talented bigname's daughter-in-law kept on challenging a daughter from a completely different house?

09-30-2018 Why a glamor talented big name's daughter-in-law kept on challenging a daughter from a completely different house?


Heard this morning's broadcasting that the glamor and talented Ina has been on this radio producing efforts that I accused as blackmail. Being talented herself, why she has problems with hard-earned fame? I search online and found out her husband carries the famous family resemblance obviously. She is a wife to a big name in a happy marriage probably is the reason for all these challenges.

I am an heir-daughter of a long history name whose privileges are protected, she is a daughter-in-law to a big wealthy business name who deserves the same privileges. This longtime struggle may have been shared among a lot of daughters-in-law who mistook my privileges are from being important enough to the big names' family seniors. This is a huge misunderstanding that my "huge success" in 2004 came from the romance, July 1st of 2004 was a big day in my life because it was the next day I inherited my grandfathers' blessing. That day was the day it was all about me and all about what I wanted because that day was my inheriting shopping spray day. My hard-earned fame glory day was on June 30th of 2004 when I participated in the conversation that led to the smartphone's invention.

I am a daughter of a big historic name whose privileges have already been acknowledged since I was born so that I was relaxed on the desire to prove to everyone I know that I have inherited some handsome blessing. I was a computer science engineer who also graduated from a medical college and had learned the basic medical system that my preference on spending my money is different to a lot of girls. I enjoy fashion, but fanciful life is not what I am not familiar with in my family's stories, I paid attention to my overall health and a healthy lifestyle more logically, of course, was the reason that my handsome spending on my own health and my own well-being has been invisible to a lot of people. My living expenses are not supposed to be shabby either, I am current just caught up in the situation called "impacted by the ownership confusion".

Being a daughter, I have learned a lot of family education on my way of growing up. One of the teachings my father had taught me was trying to listen instead of kept on expressing. So, I have learned to listen to other people's thoughts and I have learned how to recognize what sparks in other people's expression, which has been so beneficial to my own expression when I have my own thoughts. I would assume how not easy it has been to build up such a big family name has been part of the family education a daughter has brought up with, which must be such a treasure a daughter-in-law who must have been so envious of.

I have been constantly insulted to prove that I have some big money visibly, and I can imagine the pressure a lot of daughters-in-law may have been under to prove that they do have marriages truly appreciated by the big family names. I have been annoyed by all these competitions & challenges regarding who I am, and I don't have any prescription for any of them to help them to ease tons of pressures that drive them to challenge as such, but I would say it is better not to extend this pressure-handling to the family's business-investment because the old saying I listen to: "Don't party at the place you eat".

----Sept 30th, 2018

Saturday, September 29, 2018

09-29-2018 All are rumors, but I have to let people hear to check out if impacted (都是些传言,但我应该说出来让大家查查有没有受到过影响)

09-29-2018 All are rumors, but I have to let people hear to check out if impacted (都是些传言,但我应该说出来让大家查查有没有受到过影响)


中华人民共和国有已经出版的现成法律可以让政府向困扰人士解释什么法律权益及财产的法律所有权,有现成的中国公安部可以调查是否有违反法律的行为,有武装警察不怕穷凶极恶之徒,我难以明白,“活着不吃你们一粒米,死了也不用你们付丧葬费”,为什么我在美国以一个美国公民身份说我继承了我亲生爷爷在1949年中国大陆解放之前就已经信托在国外的钱居然会造成中国人民共和国的社会治安问题?
The People's Republic of China has existing in-prints laws for the Chinese government to explain to all those confused what is lawful ownership of any confused money, China has public safety department to track down those intentionally to challenge laws, and China has armed police in troops to protect Chinese people from extremes. I just can't understand, being an American citizen who "doesn't eat a piece of crops when living and bears no cost to you at death", why my freedom to state I am rich can become a disturbing factor to China's national security? All the money I stated to own has been entrusted outside China before 1949 the ruling of the current People's Republic of China.


1: I heard this morning's actress wife whose husband featured in this morning's story of "need to 30% profit need from companies in British, France, etc." is a British married since 2007. The Chinese wife is another Amercian's wife since 2006. I never met both husbands nor both wives either. (今天早上提到的“必须从法国英国的公司里拿三成利润的”那个人的妻子是个英国女演员,2007年就结婚了的。另一个中国人也是和她的美国人丈夫在2006年就已经结婚了。我从未见过这两个当丈夫的(美国人),也从未见过这两个人各自的妻子。)

2: One of the producers of this morning's broadcasting is. by rumor, the eldest child from "the Beijing ex-girlfriend's story." The updates on that story are that she was the girlfriend to my grandfather's private assistant who possibly mothers this eldest child from the private assistant Ding(丁). This private assistant Ding was rumored biologically fathered by a Mr. Yu who was in 5 cousins with the famous Beijing actor Yu, Shizhi(于是之). This private assistant Ding's biological family was rumored the group who have despised my grandmother so much to have been so reach-out to despise me in order to "disqualify" me to be the beneficiary of my own birth grandfathers' Trusts. I have contacted U.S. laws regarding all these hate-arousing efforts from the Chinese community. According to laws, I am the sole beneficiary of my own Trusts after my 2004's inheriting and entrusting.(今天早上提到的那个制作人是“北京前女友故事”的长子。最新消息是这个北京前女友其实是丁姓私人助理的一份情并一起育有这个长子。丁姓私人助理据传是有一位于先生的血脉传承,这个于先生和北京人艺的名演员于是之是五福以内的亲戚。据说这个丁姓私人助理及其血缘亲人们对我奶奶是厌恶至极,所以如此伸长了脖子对我表达如此不耻厌恶就为了让普天下的世人都明白我“如此不配”继承我自己亲生爷爷们替我设立的信托。我是就华裔社区一直有人不停的煽动针对我方敏的仇恨向美国警方报警。根据法律,在2004年我继承信托有重新办理信托之后,我是自己替我自己所设立的信托的唯一受益人。)

It is rumored private assistant Ding's biological family has been saying this in quotes: "She does not deserve you, and I would give you her money if I can have the opportunity" to everybody that in romance rumor with me. And "throw-out her children if you already have some by mistake. Just take the money," is rumored said by private assistant Ding's biological relatives in the Chinese foreign department. (据传就是丁姓私人助理的血缘家庭在到处和人说我方敏不配这个男人不配那个男人,有机会就只要把方敏的钱弄走就得。至于到处那些表态说”如果某人不幸犯错已经有了方敏的孩子也就是扔出去就得的“据说是丁姓私人助理在中国外交部的一些于姓亲朋。)

It is rumored American Albert Gore's Chinese romance Miss Yu was a former Chinese diplomat who is in 7th cousins association with private Ding's biological family, in 5-cousins relative relationship to the famous Shanghai Miss Yu who,rumored, died miserably at age 31(unmarried & unwanted, with a wounded womb incapable to carry a child) in the 1970s because her father conditioned her to have a child before inheriting the Trust in Hong Kong that her father had set up for her solely in 1946 or so. (据说美国名人阿尔贝特·高尔的中国情名嫒于姓小姐是中国外交部的前任外交官,和丁姓私人助理是7等亲,和70年代时在上海去世的那个上海名嫒于小姐是五等亲。据说上海在1970-1979年代有个于小姐,因为其父亲于先生在1946年替她在香港设立了一个信托并规定其女儿上海于小姐必须有她自己的小孩之后才可以继承(据说就是现在总值50万或者5千万美金的那个香港于家信托)。据说这个上海于小姐31岁悲凉去世时既没结过婚也交不到男朋友,她的子宫也还因为受损根本就不可能怀孕生子。)

Rumored this was the same group who may have made my father's both younger sisters had troubled marriages in Shanghai local area in the same tone as you heard from this morning's broadcasting, and possibly did give out my grandfather's money at family inheriting time as declared "get their money and move on" similarly as you heard from this morning's broadcasting.(据说就是这同一拨人可能让我父亲的两个妹妹在上海当地的婚姻都是有点故事。原因可能就是你们今天早上听到的语气表达,据说还有可能真是把我爷爷的钱在分家产时按照”就是不会要你,拿了钱就过自己日子去了”的原则送人处理了。就是你们今天早上听到的这种态度。。丁姓私人助理自己拿的是我父亲的应分的那一份。

3: I heard so many angry voices from the People's Republic of China saying I am too much. So I am asking exactly which money, what amount, whose money, what law & law items, what incidence to make you state so? In English or in Chinese. China has the Chinese Constitution(中华人民共和国宪法), Trusting laws(中华人民共和国信托法), inheriting laws(中华人民共和国继承法), and criminal laws(中华人民共和国刑法) in prints for whoever can read to find references to answer my question regarding what law & law items has regulated so clearly on what matter for so many Chinese to yell at me "too much". (我听说中华人民共和国和有很多愤怒的声音说我太过份了,我想问一下,究竟是什么钱,多少钱,谁的钱以及哪条法律的那一条条款,以及究竟什么原因让你们就是够资格如此说三道四?中华人民共和国的现行的宪法,刑法,继承法以及信托法等都是有已经正式出版过的中文版和英文版,念过书识点字的都可以查阅以回答我所提出的上述问题也就是:“究竟平哪条法律那一条款让你们可以对我吆喝实在太离谱了”。



----Sept 29th. 2018

Thursday, September 27, 2018

09-27-2018 于家故事还有多少?(How many more stories related to Yu's family)

09-27-2018 于家故事还有多少?(How many more stories related to Yu's family)


我爷爷方智仁在香港替我设立的信托,是在1948年,当时的设立资金就是一千五百万美金,方智仁爷爷在1948年设立该信托时就已经指定是为我这个(女掌)孙女所设立的该信托,方智仁爷爷的该意愿也从未更改,我方敏本人2004年是按照方智仁爷爷的遗嘱继承了该信托。丁姓私人助理及其于家亲朋和我父亲方文海以及我方敏本人都没有任何法律上的责任义务关系。

听说了上海有名的1970年代已经去世的那个于家小姐的信托,是由这个于家小姐的父亲于老先生为其女儿于小姐所设立的,设立时的金额也完全不同,和我方敏的信托根本就不是同一个信托,也不是由同一家机构进行投资管理的,我方敏和已去世的于家小姐也从无任何亲戚关系。我实在不清楚于家小姐的亲戚们究竟为什么要为我方敏的信托争执不休。
Abstract: There was a famous deceased who Miss Yu died in 1970 in Shanghai, her famous Trust was set up by her father Mr.Yu in Hong Komg. Her Trust was a complete different Trust with mine (amount, setttler, etc), and there is no association between me and deceased Miss Yu, I don't know why her relatives need to fight about my Trust.

----2018年9月27日。


据说我妈妈还在,也已经拿到了我给的退休金,据说我父亲也在,但还没有拿到我给的退休金,我自己的基本生活费也没拿到。原因就是2004年7月1日那天付款的公司就是由和每月一万美金(丁姓私人助理及于家)故事的同一个爷爷(南唐中主李璟)给我的信托所投资的。我听说目前还在撇清一些困扰,希望很快。(因为困扰,钱被困扰者给扣下了)。妈妈的那笔退休金不是这个爷爷的信托支付的,而是支付第一年生活费的那家信托,投资了一些退休基金,所以拿到了。如果爸爸的那笔和我也不是同一个爷爷,那他老人家还得再等等了。我的目前是在澄清困扰阶段(第三年的),他的那笔还没听说(如果是第二年的,就应该已经拿到了)。
(I heard my mother still alive and received retirement arrangement which was paid by the first year's providing Trust, I heard my father still alive as well but did not receive anything, similar to my situation. Mine was paid by the current still confusing one (the third year's), I don't know which one paid for my father's, he still need to wait a bit more. All paid on July 1st of 2004 but kept undistributed to us because of confusion.)

老爸爸,如果看到本博客,和我联系或者和妈妈联系,我有点现金可以支援支援你。要是你找到了妈妈,我就不用为你们两人的生活担心了。不用担心妈妈的私生活,妈妈不傻。据说有人坚持说妈妈已经又有了一个小孩,好几岁了,是不是我的亲生妈妈呀?我的亲生妈妈可是已经76岁了。那孩儿是不是她的猫孩儿狗孩儿啊?广播剧制作单位经常用电脑模拟修改真人声音也已经不是秘密。(Papa, please contact me or mama if you read this blog, I can send you some cash. If you can find out where mama is, I would feel much more comfortable about you both. Don't worry about mama's private life, she is never a stupid. The announced child may just be her cat child or dog child. It is not a secret already that radio producing often mimic voices.)

听说那几集广播剧的其中一个制作人就是那个“北京前女友”的女儿或者是其长子,据说其长子是丁姓私人助理的,据说爸爸你可是在晚餐饭桌上亲耳听到过丁姓私人助理就是当着他自己老婆的面以上海话“老二”称谓向方智仁介绍北京那女的。 据说方智仁(或丁姓私人助理自己)也在北京那女的第一个孩子出生后是用电汇送了100元人民币的礼钱。(I heard one of the producer is the Beijing ex-girlfriend's child, I heard her first born is from the private assistant Ding, I heard you heard by your own ears how she was introduced to grandpa by the private assistant in front of his wife. I heard grandpa or private assistant himself had sent her a ¥100 gift for her first child-birth.)

爸爸,估计广播剧如此制作是不希望你和妈妈联系,不是为了闹吃醋而是为了抢夺财产,理由据说是毛阿妹当年(1958年)答应过丁姓助理要和方智仁要求把方智仁想给你的那一份钱归丁姓私人助理。老爸爸,你的退休金安排是我方敏给的,香港的那个信托是方智仁自1948年设立伊始就指定我为唯一受益人的,方智仁也从未更改他是为了我在香港设立了该信托的意愿。我已经就你和妈妈的遭遇在美国报警。(I guess the radio program's producing such saying is to prevent you to reunite with mama in order to get my wealth. The reason I heard is grandma had agreed to ask grandpa give your share of inheritable to private assistant Ding. Papa, your retirement arrangement was paid by my money, I am the granddaughter grandpa specified as the sole beneficiary of the Trust he set up in Hong Kong in 1948. I have contacted laws in U.S. ever since I heard your "death".)

(4:据说我爷爷在1965年去世时,把我父亲的那一份所应继承财产(两万元人名币左右)全部给了丁姓助理,就是替我父亲还了我奶奶的那一份怀孕钱。都知道我父亲从出生起就是由我的曾祖母一手带大的。除了1956年我父亲离开部队考上南京大学之前的那一年,就从未和我奶奶共住一个屋檐下。
4: It was said that my grandfather gave my father's entire inheritable(about ¥20,000) to the private assistant in 1965 was to pay my father's debt of my grandmother's pregnancy-fee. It was well-known my father was raised by my great-grandmother ever since he was born. Other than that one year between my father left the Army and attained college, he never shared one roof with my grandmother.
----published on September 18th, 2018 )

----2018年9月27日。


很多华人都很好奇,British Convoy 究竟是什么机构?就是英国政府驻外机构的意思,据说就是英国驻美国领事馆在1776年美国独立以前的名称。当时那句话也就是在说“100%全权拥有英国驻美国领事馆”,就是一个英国在美国的移民吵架超级乐时一句笑话而已。


----2018年9月27日。

Wednesday, September 26, 2018

09-26-2018 The anger towards the possibility that my mother is still alive 我妈妈要是还活着妨碍谁了,哪来这么大的愤怒啊?

09-26-2018 The anger towards the possibility that my mother is still alive (我妈妈要是还活着妨碍谁了,哪来这么大的愤怒啊?)


The entire time I have complained this radio program is produced in order to bilk for money, please correct me on if this producing is to clarify confusions or intended to confuse the audience?

Example, who is my mother, if my mother is still alive, why my mother possibly still alive can anger so many people who never had anything to do with her entire life? All I could hear is who deserve to own her retirement arrangement and her medical expense leftovers (or the $400Million wholesome "if deceased already").

This arrangement I made for my parents is the reason I am holding the hope they may still alive even though I have an angry question regarding why it is necessary for them to be as such. I already called laws to help regarding my parents possible situation since 2015, I really have no such need nor such desire to beg some radio program producers' charity to know my parents' news, but I do appreciate any truthful reporting of my parents' whereabouts can truly ease my concern about them, as well as any respect to their privacy for preventing harassment purpose.这份退休金计划安排是我对我父母是否还活着抱有希望的原因,虽然我很气愤为什么他们需要被如此安排。2015年以后我就已经就我父母的处境而报警了,所以我不是仰赖广播剧制作人员的慈善之举才能知道我父母消息,但我很感谢对于他们生活行踪的所有如实报道让我放心他们许多,我也很感激对于他们隐私的尊重以及对于他们安全地保护。

The explanation I can give regarding the anger reflected in this morning's broadcasting:
  • 1: Regarding the retirement arrangement: I made such an arrangement for my birth mother exclusively and paid entirely by a Trust I inherited. This arrangement's related service fees were paid at the same time. It was decided on July 1st of 2004 already that any leftover in the $400Million medical expenses yearly prepayment will be taking back to the paying account. 退休金计划是我为我母亲她自己所作的安排,·100%由我所继承的一个信托已经支付了的,相关的手续费用也是同时一并支付了的。2004年7月1日那天就已经决定了医疗费用里剩余的部分会退回给付款账户。
  • 1-1: I have no idea why and how some other people can receive what money, nor from where.我完全不清楚其他人都是会从哪里拿些什么钱。
  • 2: A Trust can only be inherited by a will defined by the settler has been the major difference between a Trust-inheriting and family-inheritance. 信托是必须按遗嘱继承的,这是信托继承和一般继承的重要区别。
  • 2-1: I was never raised by my younger brother, and I never owe his wife a man's genitals I never had on my biological body. My younger brother's own willingness to have his marriage such way is none of my matter, but I have to make my statement that I do not owe my younger brother a penny nor his wife a man's genitals no matter how much I inherited, and I do not owe a penny to his wife's possible out-of-marriage child's possible birthfather's marriage family nor any of their marriages associated relatives.我不是由我的弟弟养大的,我也不欠他的妻子一条我自己身上从来没有长过的阳具。我弟弟自己愿意他自己的婚姻就是现在这种状态,这是和我完全无关的事情。但是我必须做出我自己的如下声明:不管我继承了多少钱,我都没有欠我的弟弟一分钱,我也没有欠了他的妻子一条阳具,我更没有亏欠了他的妻子可能是婚外所出小孩的可能孩子亲爹以及他们婚姻所涉及的亲朋。
  • 3: The paying American company is fully solely owned and lawfully registered by a British company which has been verified by the confusing family together with their explanations for their confusion in this same radio program's broadcasting earlier, please direct any confusion regarding this to this paying American company.
  • 3-1:  It has been explained by the paying American company that this paying together with the paying amount to cover my both parents' retirement arrangements and medical expenses are all lawfully instructed by this paying American company's lawfully registered owner-company. The ownership confusion regarding this particular American paying company's this particular payment is ridiculous enough to be a reason to insult my birth mother.

----Sept 26th, 2018


给爸爸妈妈:

1:我是否是因为个人生活方面的困扰,为了和洛家,福家的女人比飙,才一定要说自己和这两家是一样富裕。
我的回答:从来不是我在比飙。我所宣称的信托财富也从来没有和这两家的名字连在一起过。

我是在2004年6月30日继承那天被告知我所继承的信托中的两个是和这两家的财富规模差不多。如果结婚,就是同等规模的联姻 (same size match if considering marriage)。就是现在已经澄清了的合法的两笔生活费用给付(第一年,第二年)的付款信托。

听说:福家是因为每月一万美金自1997年1月起-2004年左右都是以我的名字(Min Fang)由支付公司所投资的的福家公司的总账支票账户所支付,虽然我本人没有收到,但福家的认为这是我和某某的相识被家里长辈认可的标志而比;洛家的是因为娘家姓氏和我的生活费用给付的支付公司有关联,对我的生活费用给付标准很气愤所以才比。两家都是普遍在比飙,不是一个两个特定人士。


2:我痛骂的原因:他们是在说妈妈如果还活着,就没有其他手段可以谋生。连吃饭,飞机票等恐怕都是以享受外国恋爱换来的。
我的回答:他们就是不敢相信妈妈是嫁了一个富豪的儿子,所以气势汹汹。虽然爸爸没继承到什么钱,爷爷给女儿的生活费也没让妈妈生下女儿就可以一辈子不为柴米油盐犯愁,可是,女儿给的退休金足够妈妈自己坐飞机到处游玩了,也不需要什么谋生手段了。妈妈已经退休了,女儿给的是退休金。在一切困扰澄清之前,请保护好自己。

据说国内就是这么说89年学运时出国的那一批女生的。在海外,从来没有人这么说89年学运出国的女生。美国买一张往返中国的飞机票就只要900美金,很便宜,就算是借款,她们这些女生在中餐馆做做工,两个星期就可以还得起,不需要用自己年轻的外国恋爱来换一张飞机票钱或者路费。

----Sept 26th, 2018

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

09-25-2018 89年学运同学为了Viagra的智慧产权就有和我杠上了&桥口大学的那个马一茜 (Tracy Ma )

09-25-2018 89年学运同学为了Viagra的智慧产权就有和我杠上了& 桥口大学的那个马一茜 (Tracy Ma )


今天早上的广播可以听出海外一些89年学运对当年的那份怀恋,当年89年的那一代,都是自己的孩子都快要大学毕业的一代人,如今还能在广播上听见当年自己上大学时的“同学们,我们上街游行去吧”的那一份认真和执着。

我对今天早上播出的意见就是: 作为警界从业人员,他们为什么说他们自己是美国法律管辖权的解释权威而不再只是法律的执行者?在美国,法律的管辖解释权争议应该是属于美国最高法院法官来解释的。

今天早上提到的就是我在Viagra里的那一份智慧产权收入被人提走是否属于美国警方查办案件范围,89年学运同学说就只是属于民事纠纷,警方不会理睬。

我听说的是美国药业公司已经就我方敏是否有智慧产权以及如何评估的做出了解释,89年学运的同学是在质疑美国药业公司所做的评估不公吗?可是拿钱的那一方根本就也没参与Viagra的研究也没对Viagra的研究做出贡献,就只是个制药行业的从业人员,为什么这种某名奇妙直接拿钱就变成了民事纠纷,依据是什么呀?

如果我不满意药业公司对我所作贡献的评估,或者参与Viagra的研究人员不同意药业公司所作的评估结果,按照法律常识,属于民事纠纷。也就是说,这笔钱,要么是我的,要么就是参与研究的其他人员的,或者就是专利买家公司不应该支付的款项。拿钱的人所拿的应该是什么钱,必须从Viagra的专利所得中支付?89年学运的同学有什么药业方面的专业知识能力以及权威可以在Viagra的专利产权评估的权威性上发表如此言论?

据悉,有华人坚持是该药业公司的权威人士对我所发表言论极为反感,我的态度是请给我一个电邮进行符合法律的权威性的纠正。我的电邮地址:somebodyinMA@gmail.com

----2018年9月25日


还有,就是上海人马一茜,就是以前硚口大学(BridgeportUniversity)的那个Tracy Ma,据说还在四处拨打电话散步对我方敏仇恨。据说她的做法被她的中国领导人“姻亲”,开玩笑说这是在从事当年中国共产党地下组织的工作。

如果这是真的,作为马一茜可能是在违反美国法律散布仇恨这种做法的可能的受害人,我方敏想问一下,这是在鼓励马一茜破坏美国法律甚至推翻美国政府吗?当年的中国共产党的地下组织就是用这种方法宣传中国当时执政的国民党政府是个贪污腐败根本没有法律只有贪赃枉法的政府。当年的中国共产党地下组织就是用这种方式成功推翻了中国国民政府,所以我才问,中国政府高官是在鼓励用这种方法散步仇恨就是应该吗,目的究竟是什么?有否想过这种做法有可能在中国推翻中国共产党自己领导的政府吗?为什么在中国共产党已经取得中国960万平方公里土地的政治领导权的情况下,不能用中国共产党自己所制订的中华人民共和国的法律来解决各种矛盾?作为中国国家法治建设的领导人,是否认为马一茜的做法是在违反美国的法律?

----2018年9月25日


关于康州硚口大学毕业的上海人马一茜(Tracy Ma, Tiffany Ma),华人社区有很多说法。

我的回应:2004年7月以前,我经常去她家里做客不是因为恨她。而是当她是个可以一起聊聊天的,但绝不愿意让她到我家里翻箱底的这么一个人。我当时从未听说过串婚,也打心眼里不赞同她的婚姻观,她的方姓丈夫虽也是籍贯宁波镇海的上海人,但我当时从未听说有此亲戚(现在听说也确实没有血缘关系),她丈夫也是马一茜向我介绍是她丈夫的,所以我是在2004年6月份在新洲一对夫妻都不是上海人的大学同学家里提到马一茜小孩一事,但从未向她丈夫举报,因为不是她丈夫朋友也确实不知该如何处理才合适。

2004年7月1日据说有提到马一茜,因为当时的美国移民法改革,她的方姓丈夫虽是美国公民但不能帮她解决美国居留身份问题,我当时挺乐意帮帮她解决她的身份(现在听说她的身份是别人帮忙解决的),但不乐意给她丈夫一笔钱。据说有些华人对此很愤怒,我就很奇怪,我当时是马一茜的朋友,我就只愿意帮她解决一下她的美国居留身份却会愿意给她丈夫一大笔钱,为什么呀?想让她丈夫把她当垃圾给扔出去啊?我当时并不恨马一茜,我为什么会这么处理?

很多人说,如果马一茜在2004年7月以前对我还是很友善,我为什么在2004年6月把她说成那样?因为确实就她的婚姻观对她有看法。我是听马一茜自己说她丈夫对她有多好,我是听马一茜自己说她是自己如何坚决愿意和以前的男朋友分手,就为和她的丈夫可以正正经经结婚生孩子的,我是听马一茜自己说她的丈夫如何愿意做两份餐馆工让她可以不用出去做工的 , 我从未像很多女人对马一茜不用出去做工很反感,就是因为我是亲眼看见是她丈夫自己的态度是他自己很愿意他自己多苦点可以让他自己的老婆小孩舒服点,然后我是自己发现原来她的小孩不是她丈夫亲生的。

就是因为我确实因为她的婚姻观对她本人有很多负面看法,平时很多不会说的与我无关的小细节,那天的负面态度也都体现了。但我当时很清楚,就算我对她有很多负面看法,她的婚姻问题还是不应该由我介入,2004年7月1日那天我当时还是乐意帮她解决身份问题让她不用依赖婚姻。

2004年7月底我搬到麻州波士顿后,马一茜对我当时在摩根大通银行工作的恶意仇恨宣泄似的干扰是我从那时起就不再和马一茜交往的原因,马一茜在我2007年1月离开摩根大通银行之后持续不懈的仇恨表达是我永远认为马一茜很恶劣的原因。

所谓的上海心理学界对此的一些解释,可能是基于他们都是上海人很清楚丁姓私人助理1967-1996年的家庭财务如何优越,而非对于已经远在美国多年的我方敏有多少了解。


------2018年11月2日。

Monday, September 24, 2018

09-24-2018 今天早上播出了中国出入境管理局永久禁止方敏入境 (Forbidden to enter China announced this morning on the radio program)

09-24-2018 今天早上播出了中国出入境管理局永久禁止方敏入境 (Forbidden to enter China announced this morning on the radio program)


听说了今天早上中国出入境管理局雇佣演员宣布了永久禁止方敏入境。我是接到过中国领事馆的一个电话通知,是有这么一个文件,起因于国内执法单位发现有我的假护照。我已报告美国警方我从未认识该案的涉案人员也从未参与提供私人资料。不知今天早上的播出是否和此有关,但我也不是太在意。
I heard this morning's broadcasting about the announcement from the Chinese Bureau of Exit and Entry Administration, the announcement is to forbid me to enter China permanently. I did receive a phone call from NYC consulate about a forged passport caught by Chinese law enforcement earlier this year. I have reported to the U.S. law people that I never heard of the involved personnel and I never participated by providing my personal information. I am not certain if this morning's broadcasting is because of this but it does not bother me a lot.

旁人看我的处境就是:如果我有钱,是中国政府在海内海外号召华人对我恶意攻击;如果我没钱,我是既没钱也没有任何亲朋好友或者任何工作学习需要去中国大陆,包括旅游在内。所有国内交往过没有交往过的人士名单基本上都已经一网打尽,全部通过广播剧高调宣布和我过去没有现在没有将来也永远不会有任何关系了。
From outsiders, my situation is if I have money, it is from the Chinese government who organized all these malicious attacks me as a person. If I have no money, I have no friends, nor associated personnel, nor associated any sort of organization, nor any sort of contacts to be a reason for me to go to China, not even as a tourist. All-inclusively in an almost complete list that has announced loudly on the radio program to have no association with me, in the past, at present, and in the future.

我本人看法:全部都是经过中国政府,美国人阿尔伯特·高尔和美国洛克菲勒家一些人士进行组织安排和协调而恶意制造的舆论事件。就广播剧制作单位的所有这些做法,我都已经在美国报警。
From myself, All these conducted malicious shit-throwing on the media are organized by this administration of Chinese government, American Albert Gore and Rockefellers,  I have already contacted U.S. law enforcement about all these illegal activities in radio program producing.

美国有法律,我就只要投诉向警方投诉美国的阿尔伯特·高尔及洛克菲勒家一些人士是否是在通过广播剧制作单位恶意性骚扰或者进行仇恨犯罪就可以,都是美国联邦刑事法律所规定的罪名。所以,如果确实是阿尔伯特·高尔或者洛克菲勒家一些人士有参与制造并传播仇恨,我会受到美国法律保障。美国政府是誓言捍卫法制国家的。
The United States is a lawful country so that I just need to complain to the laws if American Albert Gore or if Rockefellers have conducted malicious sexual harassment or even hate crime against me, both are federal crimes. So, I will be protected by laws if I have been the victim of the sexual harassment or the hate crime that possibly conducted by the American Albert Gore or the Rockefellers. The U.S. government has sworn to keep the U.S. a lawful country.

至于中国方面,如果确实是这一届的中国政府在通过广播剧参与针对我方敏的敲诈勒索恐吓威胁并破坏名誉的一系列中国刑法所界定的刑事犯罪活动,不准我入境中国的宣布,对我的人身安全来说,不是什么负面宣布。
About China, if it is indeed this administration of the Chinese government who conducted all these crimes as Extortion, threatening, blackmail and name harm against me, it is not a negative announcement at all to forbid me to enter China, as long as I won't be safe from being a victim defined by the Chinese criminal laws but possibly victimized by the Chinese government, this is from my personal safety point of views.

在美国,通过大众传媒制造谎言散布仇恨,已经超越了美国宪法所赋予的言论自由。
原因:不是每一个美国公民都可以任意凭一张美国公民身份证就可以走进任何一家大众传媒广播公司随便发表个人看法,所以,在大众传媒的广播上发表个人看法已经超越美国宪法所赋予每一个美国公民的的平等美国公民权力,我个人认为应该不属于是美国宪法所保障的每一个美国公民的,平等的,言论自由的权利。
In the United States, to spread maliciousness, negativeness or even hate emotions on public media is beyond the right of freedom of speech.
Reason: Not every single U.S citizen can freely walk into a public media radio broadcasting company to express the personal opinion on a public radio broadcasting media so that it is not the right of freedom granted by the U.S. Constitution that supposes to be a same equal right to all U.S. citizens. I personally think freely publish the personal opinion on a not free-accessible-to-all public media is not in the scope of freedom of speech as the right from the U.S. Constitution.

09-21-2018 The maiden names and a granddaughter's comments (娘家姓氏及一个孙女的评语)


----2018年9月24日。



Sunday, September 23, 2018

09-23-2018 Why my parents haven't contacted me if they still alive? (如果爸爸妈妈还活着,他们怎么还没和我联系啊?)

09-23-2018 Why my parents haven't contacted me if they still alive? (如果爸爸妈妈还活着,他们怎么还没和我联系啊?)


A lot would ask me why my parents don't come to Boston to unite with me if they both still alive. I assume one big possibility is the financial situation. I have been pennies that is truly no cash at all until I called law's help since 2015. I am still in the situation that taking an air flight will make me ponder. (很多人可能都会问我,如果我父母还活着,为什么他们不来波士顿找我。我估计最大的可能就是他们的经济状况。我2015年前就一直是一分钱现金都没有知道报警后才逐渐好转。我现在也还是没有坐飞机去外地的经济能力。)

Another possible reason is unrecognizable. Photos I published on this web blog are both unrecognizable to my parents if they both still alive. If they met me in person, I am possibly recognizable to them because my appearance resembles my mother when she was in her 50s. My body figure is unrecognizable. I assume they are possibly the same, recognizable to the family when in person.(另一个可能的原因就是因为癌症治疗期间,长相变得认不出来了。我在这个博客上发表的两张照片我父母就不会敢相认。如果他们还在,在街上遇见我就有可能认得出来,我现在的样子很像我妈妈50多岁的时候。我的身形还是完全认不出来。我估计他们也是差不多,但家里人见了面能认得出来。)

The third possible reason is why they are in this shabby situation if the daughter should have made a lot of money from the radio program worldwide broadcasting. Well, the daughter has been in a same shabby situation because “1) so many people deserve to take the daughter's intellectual income to live a much better life", 2) a lot confused families have been concerned if my living expenses payments are actually from their family wealth, so that law people have to withhold the intellectual income discovered and payments cleared from confusions (two out of four already) till the daughter is clarified to be safe to have the free access to the money.第三个原因可能就是他们难以理解为什么自己女儿的广播剧全世界热播挣了好多钱,他们怎么过的这么惨?因为 1) 有太多人“就是应该拿我的钱过一份应得的好日子”,2)还有很多人很担心我的生活费用给付是不是从他们家的财产里付出来的,所以一些已明确是我的智慧产权的收入以及一些已经澄清困扰的生活费用给付(4个中的两个已经澄清)都是在被警方保护着直到女儿我可以安全拿钱为止,女儿我现在经济上也是一样的惨兮兮。)

The fourth possibility is the doubts from the father why the daughter insists on to have such huge inheriting instead of being truthful, being truthful is still a never shabby inheriting at all. It is because the daughter has been truthful. This huge handsomeness the daughter was told was the reason the daughter needed to count fingers to calculate which generation grandfather could possibly have blessed the daughter this handsomely when the daughter was asked about which grandfather had blessed the daughter on July 1st of 2004. I was told two Trusts that one of which I still don't know blessed by which grandfather but fought high-pitched fiercely for one of its investment's ownership on Boston's radio 96.9FM, grandfather Fang, Zhiren's Hong Kong trust was the result of my inquiry because of our family story of the intended HongKong pickle factory. I have announced 4 grandfathers had blessed me but I only know which one for two, both my announcement and their mysterious anonymous are not jokes.(第四个可能的原因就是做父亲的奇怪为什么女儿坚持要把所继承的财产夸大,方智仁爷爷给我这个孙女儿的信托怎么不体面了,怎么丢人了?女儿没夸大,女儿说的是实话。就是因为规模好大,2004年的7月1日,当有人问做女儿的,究竟是哪个爷爷给的钱,做女儿的就只好扳着个手指头数数猜猜看有可能是那一代的爷爷给的钱。在继承那天,我是被告知了两笔信托(当时以为是公司),方智仁爷爷的那笔信托是我因为家里有爷爷曾经有运设备到香港想办个酱园厂的故事而特意询问的。我被告知的那两笔信托中的一个我至今不知是哪个爷爷给我的,就是那个我在波士顿96.9FM上吵的很凶的那个。我这个博客上所宣布的4个爷爷给我设立的信托中,有两个爷爷我还不知是那一代的,我的宣布和两个爷爷的神秘都不是吹牛的。)



If I have this much blessing already, why the younger generation grandfathers still blessing me handsomely? I have been the extra-son that nobody heard of for each of this blessing-story generation that blessed with a non-heir-son's size. It was so obvious in my great-grandmother's generation that all my great-grandfather's children were from her but she did not mind at all when there was one extra-child who was blessed with a Trust.(我都已经有好些爷爷给我钱了,为什么后面的爷爷还给我钱?我一直都是哪个多出来的一个不知哪儿冒出来的非继承人儿子。在分家产时也顺便给我设一个信托也就是给我送个礼物的意思。这在我曾祖母那一代就特别明显,我曾祖父所有的孩子都是我曾祖母生的,等到分家产时,还是又多出了一个非继承人儿子的信托,而我曾祖母还一点都没在意还一点都不生气这不知从哪儿冒出来的一个孩子分到了理应是她孩子们的财产。她其实很清楚,这多出来的一个也是她的孩子--- 她的曾孙女我。)

My grandfather put the majority of his wealth into that Trust in Hong Kong because the beneficiary girl (me) would be born as his heir-granddaughter so that he entrusted the heir's share together with the family traditional blessing in that Trust. I am the heir of my grandfather's line of this generation. (我爷爷方智仁是把他绝大部份的财产都给放在了他在香港替我设立的信托里,是因为受益人我是他孙女也是他的继承人,他给我设的这个信托既是他给我的礼物也是他给我作为继承人的继承人份额。我是方智仁这一支这一代的继承人。)

I am proud of my historical family, and I am blessed I came from a loving happy marriage. I already told everyone my family has been messy-looking since ancient times which gets messier and messier in the teleconferences in 2004, now I know it was since the Southern Tang dynasty which was about a thousand years ago, my Southern Tang Emperor grandfathers were famous in our hometown Nanjing area for their street-vendor appearances if not wearing their crowns.(我很为我的家世而骄傲,我很幸运我是出生在有爱的婚姻里。我在2004年就已经向全世界广而告之我们一家就是看着是瘪瘪遢遢的,现在我可是知道这瘪遢是从一千年前南唐时期就已经是这样了。我南唐皇帝的爷爷们在我的家乡南京是有名的不带王冠在街上晃悠的时候看着就像是街上的混混。)

I thought I already prepared the entire world about my family's messy appearance since 2004, why would I have any problem with my parents when I am the same messy? Definitely not being proud of being messy, I am a girl and I know for sure a complete change-over only takes a phone call to a good shopping specialist once I receive my living-expenses providing. (我还以为我都已经在2004年就给全世界就此打了个预防针,我哪里还会在乎我父母及我自己这瘪遢样子?这说法绝不是在为瘪遢骄傲,我是个女孩子,我很清楚一旦我的生活费用给付拿到,想要改头换面也就只需要打个电话给个好一点的购物专家就可以了。)

09-21-2018 The maiden names and a granddaughter's comments (娘家姓氏及一个孙女的评语)


----Sept 23rd, 2018

Saturday, September 22, 2018

09-22-2018 中国组织的所谓演出似乎就是对着全球华人肆意当个诅咒的和哭丧的

09-22-2018 中国组织的所谓演出似乎就是对着全球华人肆意当个诅咒的和哭丧的


中国自古就有家里死人的要声势浩大的哭丧表演的传统,而中国组织的这场演出号称是一切都是真实,也就是哭丧也是因为有真实丧事表演真实哭丧,针对真实人物表达真实诅咒。

从今年(2018年)的农历年三十开始,就有传言到处都是一片华人在表演嚎啕大哭的声音,这嚎啕丧哭直到农历新年结束,不知中国人民共和国如此表演哭丧,是中国政府里谁死了或者谁该死。

今天早上据说是电影演员陈坤和董洁在真实的表达诅咒,以他们自己一辈子永远不可能有个真正的家来表达对所谓如果某某有小孩是真实,这人也就一辈子只能如此地诅咒,就只是不知他们究竟是在诅咒谁。我方敏没声没音,就是因为还行。孩子今后和我一起生活也好,不和我一起生活也好,都是有人照顾也不担心孩子委屈,最多也就是担心孩子和我没感情或者被人教唆着对我狠三恨四的,我就自己想开,要是如此就再生几个和我亲的。

我现在也就是等着目前警方就我方敏是否被谋财者绑架勒索的司法调查有个眉目,我本人目前不是太清楚究竟是否是司法调查。/我所投诉的就是为什么我拿不到我所继承的信托所支付的生活费用,反正有人在处理。等目前这些事情结束,就凭我自己爷爷的祝福就是够资格找个年轻英俊的做个polygamist过我自己的甜美好日子,他们这些广而告之的诅咒也就是一场狗急跳墙的干嚎而已。

海外一直有传言,名导演张艺谋是中国这场实景演出的总导演,而我还听说我本人被广播剧公开宣布不可能是08奥运创意人就是因为张艺谋的老婆公开私下都如此表达。我对张艺谋的意见就是:瞧瞧,08奥运开幕式的特点是炫美华丽人文精粹,如今这广播剧整个就是哭穷讨饭拿钱来,摆明是在表达所谓张艺谋特色,就这,他老婆还说08奥运开幕式不是我的创意。

有人说最近这一阵子,广播剧制作都有海外89年学运的女生参与,那话就更多了。按照他们这些海外89年学运的宣布,我方敏早就已经被美国政府按照讹诈罪名起诉判罪被关在美国的联邦监狱里了。所有国内所听说的在海外华裔社区的种种说法,统统都是这些海外89年学运的宣布和分析。这些89年学运当年在国内是气势如虹轰轰烈烈,来到海外又都是特别人物特别待遇,据说女生们还都是被外族裔男士热追过,估计是实在难以平复那一腔的凭什么他们都不是些富豪名流的愤怒。

我也确实没看见过他们这些89年学运的。你们听听他们的计谋都是些什么呀,就是只要找个政府工作,以政府工作人员名义再以策略计谋的名头做这做那,只要木已成舟,就算是把个活人给上了手铐脚镣直接关在个黑屋子里,只要警察可以按照策略计谋的要求坚决就是不管,或者警察就是他们自己,老百姓就是一点办法都没有,一点办法都没有。你们说这是聪敏妙计谋还是刑事渎职罪?海外89年学运人士在海外华裔社区就是这个名声。当年二十岁的大学生,可以想象会如此幼稚,现在都快五十岁了,这是在表达他们才是真正有本事的啊?

广播剧上的海外华人所表达似乎全是如此,要是谈到我所享受的美国政府福利里的粮食卷政府楼,就只谈美国的福利相关法律说我不符合条件,却坚决不提我是美国的劳工相关法律所界定的理应从广播剧里有30亿-45亿美金收入的美国公民在法律协调期间符合享受美国政府帮助条件,他们还全都不是审批我是否够资格享受美国政府福利的美国政府工作人员,他们都是美国政府工作人员,就是都和我没什么关系,全部都是气势汹汹,必须要让我在餐馆做个洗碗的工作每个月可以挣个一千美金吃口饱饭。

我还听到,广播剧在宣传,要是我母亲还在,就必须得让外族裔人士给操了才能体现美国是个婚姻自由的国家,我本人认为我妈妈如果还在,就只能从英国王储威廉王子本人及美国的四星将军David Petraeus本人那里学学美国英国的真正婚姻自由。只有这两个人和我传过绯闻的人士是众所周知我非常非常喜欢的,一直很为其吃醋的高质量又有钱有品的高级上流社会 人物。要是他们两人在已经明确表态坚决永远不要我方敏之后,却愿意和我目前已经76岁的亲生妈妈恋爱恋爱的,这才会是被广大听众所认可的真正所有人都推崇的真正的恋爱自由,这才是由他们两个人所坚决支持的的广播剧所宣扬的真正的恋爱自由。其他任何人确实是统统都不够资格表达什么才是真正的恋爱自由。

妈妈,你要是还活着,你就只有是和英国王储威廉王子本人上床恋爱,你才可以被我理解,你就只是想要追求自由,你就只是想要证明你有恋爱的自由。全世界都知道,我很为英国王储威廉王子本人而吃醋不已。美国四星将军的年龄实在是有点不够资格体现真正的恋爱自由,就比我亲生妈妈小了十二岁而已,算什么呀。

我本人态度也就是:你们以绑架方式以表演手段污蔑造谣诽谤破化我方敏名誉,甚至以政府工作人员或者警方人员名义散布不实消息,就为毁灭我的一份感情一段婚姻并威胁我孩子的安全是我向美国警方投诉你们的原因,如果你们自己就是警方,你们自己也很清楚,美国警方也是有内部督察署的。

我方敏从来就不是嫁入豪门,我本人比我孩子爹家里富裕,我不是嫁入豪门也不担心害怕,今后我也还是那一份不愁没有英俊陪伴的浪漫婚姻家庭人生,你们的喧闹也就是一片过眼烟云,你们自己也很清楚,美国是一切法律。



----2018年9月22日。

Friday, September 21, 2018

09-21-2018 The maiden names and a granddaughter's comments (娘家姓氏及一个孙女的评语)

09-21-2018 The maiden names and a granddaughter's comments (娘家姓氏及一个孙女的评语)


A lot of people must have asked why I don't defend myself on the radio, I heard the explanation given is I lost my voice because of glasshouse cancer which is a true statement. I have complained about a lot of harassments to keep me in this "heavily flu-alike accented unrecognizable voice".

And, who are those attorneys on the radio? A lot are indeed sent by the female who publicly thrown a lot of shits at me to prove she is the real sexuality. Now you can imagine why it sounds some defenses are there but always effectively put me in the situation that has been "an overall disadvantaged enough" status. Some would say, but there are great points sometimes as well, well, that is my confusion as well if the intention is to keep the family name a bit decent.

Alright, but where are my attorneys if I am wealthy enough and financially independent enough as I claimed? They are obviously around because I am not crushed to pieces yet even though my financial identity is very confusing to the government sector as well. So, I am the one growing more and more comfortably quiet to wait for the things to be sorted out.

Exactly, what is the problem between me and the big family name? The maiden names.

Most involved are from maiden names that historically associated with my "financial identity". They are the Missy from the confused families who are so pissed off about my $400Million yearly living expenses providing and more. As you heard, the education from this radio program is the family name is the protection even if you performed a bank robbery as long as you make it clear in front the objective is the Chinese woman Min Fang's money only. And it seems the family names have dedicated promoting themselves as the role models for conducting real robberies to prove "nothing could be wrong even if it is truly a bank robbery (or murder for money) as long as Min Fang is the target." So, as I announced on this blog, I send the family names to the U.S. law enforcement already because I am so confused by this so impressive motive. But I did not call U.S. law enforcement's help on why every pissed off maiden name has been announced the true sexuality to the one & only family name I ever met, because I am indeed "not interested in a leftover sexuality."

So, what kind of confusion can be so impressively strong? I am not the person aware of a lot as well except the confusion is all about one company that has the $10,000 dollars per month story.

These maiden names anger has been:
They are the true owners of the paying company.

My anger has been:
I did not pick up any payment-checks in person from the paying company. All those payments were according to instructions from the paying companies' lawfully registered investor-owners. All by my entrusting groups' arrangement.

The result:
I have been shitted all over worldwide, and intended service providers have been harassed If dare to give out the payment money or provide any paid already service.

My hypothesis question:
Is the paying company the same company they truly own?
Evidential question: Why not confronting the paying company they truly own?

The action I have taken:
1: I asked U.S. laws protection on possible severe harassments and more.
2: I ask all confused families to do me a big favor to direct all their confusion to the paying company instead of me nor intended service providers.

By the way, why there is such an impressive expectation for me to pay to be disgusted as the never wanted who deserved to bow to the true sexuality?
(为什么会有让人印象如此深刻的期待,会要求让我付钱被骂成没人要的烂货必须向床上的真货顶礼摩拜?)

From the radio program, all that audience could hear is how this or that female is the real butts truly enjoyable. I am such unwanted disgusted is the enough reason to demand me to pay handsomely to be shitted all over and to be expected to bow to the true butts. Well, rumored it was from the private assistant's family this was how my grandmother was requested by the private assistant's wife in exchange for my grandmother to be acknowledged as the private assistant's woman.
从广播剧上,广大听众听来听去,都是在说这女的,那女的才是床上真货,我方敏没人会要,就是我方敏必须付钱必须挨骂必须向床上真货鞠躬的原因和理由。据说那是丁姓私人助理向我奶奶所提出的要求,作为我奶奶被他老婆所承认是他床上女友的交换条件。(据说是1958年我奶奶去世前住在医院的时候)

I have to say my grandmother was truly not pretty at all and truly fat enough after four children. Ever since marriage, she was the one under enormous pressure to be replaced instead of being wanted even by outsiders for most of her prime years, or more accurately, the entire marriage years. After all these years under my grandfather's "charitable touches out of the duty as the husband betrothed-before-birth" to share four children between them, she must have been desperate enough and proud enough when my grandfather finally made her the housewife with the family savings account.
(我只能说句实话我奶奶确实是长得很不好看(准确点是丑的真是很可以啦,她妈妈应该还可以,她娘家弟弟就很英俊。这就是指腹为婚了,惨哦,宝没押准),开始交往时又是在她生了四个孩子以后(最小的的都已经8岁9岁了),身材实在是肥的很离谱以后,据说她的腹部肚皮都已经是皮叠皮啦(还不是因为肥,就因生孩子太多),她才会面对如此要求啦。自从结婚以后,我奶奶就一直是在长期高压下担心被我爷爷因为喜欢年轻漂亮而给扫地出门的一个,年轻时候一直如此,确切地说是结婚以后及一直如此。在结婚多年就只有我爷爷会给她一点“看在指腹为婚的份上,就是尽尽丈夫义务”的爱抚,生下两人的四个孩子之后,再加上我爷爷总算是把家里的钱归她管了,可以想象我奶奶又是昂首挺胸总算是当家作主了,又是热锅上的蚂蚁一副猴急难耐寂寞的馋相,才会答应和我爷爷的私人助理来个床上坦诚相见(也就是展示展示那叠叠的肚皮,还能有什么呀?)

These are truly a granddaughter's comments from the story I heard that she actually accepted my grandfather's private assistant who she was so despised as "smelly stunk". I am definitely not after her in every bit and my grandfather had paid it ¥20,000 RMB very clear in 1965. (这还真是我作为孙女听说我奶奶在医院面对付钱才被承认的要求痛骂私人助理是个“肮脏恶心的垃圾货”之后对我奶奶所谓浪漫故事的真是评语。我还真是一丁点都不像她。我爷爷是在1965年支付了两万元人民币。

*My grandmother died in 1958 or so. She was betrothed to my grandfather before both were born. My grandfather was a famous playboy refused to divorce his ugly wife for his love to his firstborn ( my father ).
我奶奶是在1958年左右去世的,我爷爷奶奶是指腹为婚。我爷爷喜欢交女友是个有名的花花公子,但他为了对他第一个孩子的爱,也就是为了对我的父亲的爱坚决不肯休了他的丑老婆在30年代的老上海是很有名的。


(4:据说我爷爷在1965年去世时,把我父亲的那一份所应继承财产(两万元人名币左右)全部给了丁姓助理,就是替我父亲还了我奶奶的那一份怀孕钱。都知道我父亲从出生起就是由我的曾祖母一手带大的。除了1956年我父亲离开部队考上南京大学之前的那一年,就从未和我奶奶共住一个屋檐下。
4: It was said that my grandfather gave my father's entire inheritable(about ¥20,000) to the private assistant in 1965 was to pay my father's debt of my grandmother's pregnancy-fee. It was well-known my father was raised by my great-grandmother ever since he was born. Other than that one year between my father left the Army and attained college, he never shared one roof with my grandmother.
----published on September 18th, 2018 )


The Explanation to the Chinese community why I am the sole beneficiary? (对华裔社区所好奇的:为什么我是唯一的受益人?)
The answer: Inheriting according to the will (wills). (答案:是按遗嘱继承)

爸爸妈妈:你们要是活得还挺好,我的门牌号(apartment#)是2494.


----Sept 21st, 2018, updated on Sept 23rd, 2018


Thursday, September 20, 2018

09-21-2018 Trust-Inheriting and Trust-Investing (信托继承和信托投资)

09-21-2018 Trust-Inheriting and Trust-Investing (信托继承和信托投资)


今天听懂了一些2004年7月1日参与会议者的那一份激和急“我坐在那里为什么没有继承到东西?” (Finally I understand why there are people so angry about how come sitting there as well on July 1st of 2004 but haven't inherited anything yet?)

他们不是在和我抢东西,他们以为那是一个集体继承仪式,所继承的不是他们家里老人留下的钱,而是他们自己过去交往过的社交朋友或者恋爱经历在那人自己去世时以继承的方式送给了他们什么礼物。虽然他们在2004年以前从未想过,但如果这个朋友有送礼物,他们怎么就是不可以或者就是不准拿这份礼物。(They are not trying to get what is mine. They thought it was a group inheriting that day, the inheritable was not from their family-seniors but from their own deceased social friends or romances as a gift. Even though they never expected such gifting before 2004, but why they are not allowed to inherit if there is such a gift and where are their inheritable now? )

我本人是在2004年6月30日继承了我的父系爷爷们替我所办理的信托,是按照遗嘱继承的。我当时虽然是在一个大的电话会议上,但不在同一个电话线上(類似一线, 二线这种), 而是另外一个电话会议。所以虽然当时有中国代表在场(在大的电话会议上),但没有人知道我是否继承。我本人没有听说2004年7月1日时候有人是否继承。我确实不清楚. (I inherited some Trusts set up for me by my father-side grandfathers, it was according to each of my grandfather's will. Even though I was in a big teleconference but I was on a different line (such as line1. line 2, etc) with my grandfathers' entrusting groups so that nobody knew if I did inherit anything even though there were representatives from Chinese government presented in the big teleconference at the same time. I did not hear if there was such inheriting that day so I really don't know. )

Regarding this morning's some companies' ownership argument which is if the companies are investments of a Trust (Trusts) I inherited, I am not the person knows what might be the confusion. I am the acknowledged beneficiary person of the Trust (Trusts), but I am absolutely oblivious about its business entity's investing. Please direct all your confusion to the company. (至于今天早上有关公司所有权的争议, 即一些公司是否是由我所继承的一些信托所投资的, 我本人确实不清楚所争议的是什么. 我本人是法律所认可的这些信托的唯一受益人, 但我本人对于这些信托的投资运作完全不清楚. 请向引发争议的公司提出所有的困惑疑問.)


** 妈妈:要是你还在,以你自身经历 就不用太担心爸爸, 我听说他只有基本生活费,但有吃有住。我给的退休金还没有收到。我也在找爸爸的消息。听说爸爸也是因自身经历一直在找你的消息, 我也因为自身经历担心你和爸爸的生活, 已经向警方求助。

还有,听说有人一定要邀请老二的老婆或他们两人到美国,估计会有一些踩死你们的一些活动,请保护好自己。我已经就邀请方(据传是一个洛克菲勒夫人)如此执意介入我的私人生活及私人财物问题是否已是骚扰犯罪行为而报警处理。

另外,据说有人说爸爸是吃一口多一口,那可能和丁姓私人助理一家有关。听说爷爷就是因为答应了把你的那份两万左右的钱给他之后,才被救护车送进医院的,不是同一天。爷爷估计清楚才会说在医院说都怪他自己花钱太多了。

都是不知是否真实,但请保护好自己。我自己也已经向警方投诉华裔社区不知为什么就是不准我花我自己的钱,老逼着我去做低工资的工作挣口饭吃。

----Sept 20th, 2018


Wednesday, September 19, 2018

09-19-2018 My living-enough mother and Trust-Inheriting

09-19-2018 My living-enough mother and Trust-Inheriting


If alive, my mother should be over 76 years old and my father would be over 86 years old, why I need to scream about my mother's sexuality? That is for the leftover portion from the $400Million per year medical expense. So, I make my announcement here: All the accumulated leftover from the $400Million per year medical expenses of my both parents should be transferred back to my name.
----Min Fang 09/19/2018

Without this $400Million per year medical expenses arrangement, my mother's sexuality advantage in legal immigration status and retirement arrangement would be only attractive to "shabby looking man" or the truly homeless, this is indeed true from my own personal experiences. This is because every man else would be wanted by a so much better female that even touching or talking would arouse serious jealous reaction (from my real-life experience), but money hand-over would be tolerable and expected (from rumor-stories style education I have received).

So, I say to my obviously living-enough mother: Don't worry about your sexuality, whoever has an eye for you normally would be persuaded away before a Mister can have an opportunity to see you close enough or before you have ever heard of the Mister. This comforting message is from my own real rich experiences.

Also, the confusion between family-inheriting and Trust-inheriting. The questions are:
1: How can I choose Trust-Inheriting when I have relatives.
I did not choose. It was chosen by the deceased, never by the living. Inheriting is the process of the wealth's ownership change. Family-inheriting means the ownership immediate change from the deceased to the living upon death, by will or no will from the deceased.

Trust-Inheriting means the deceased had intentionally transferred the ownership to the intermedium party to look after the wealth before ownership to be transferred to the intended beneficiary by the will (the Settler's letter). The Trust-inheriting normally happen years after the death.

2: Why I did not inform relatives.
I did forget my inheriting in 2004 so I did not inform anyone. Also, I have no contact information to contact nor inheriting related information in 2015. So I informed everyone on this blog since 2017.

3: Why my brother's wife is not my in-law.
My brother stays in his marriage as his free will even though I heard it is public already that she mothers another man's child. I doubted if this freedom of marriage was the excuse that caused my parents' death-certificates ousted from my parents' own apartment. I am not willing to risk my own living nor my own life as long as I have this doubts. And I already wrote letters to the related places to announce myself have nothing to do with my brother's marriage and his in-laws. So, my brother's wife is not my in-law is factually effective.

4: What will happen if my brother's wife is invited to insult me as you heard on the radio wherever I need to present by those so publicly well-known enemies of mine?
As you heard on the radio, she has been obviously strongly supported by her child's birth father to insult his wife publicly. She may also have been supported by the similar party from the Rockefeller name for possibly similar reasons to insult their own.

I have nothing to do with all parties above and I don't care, but I have "entitled" my brother's wife an "outer public-bathroom" from her mating-pregnancy rumor, and I don't like to be insulted as you have heard on the radio as well for whatever true reasons.

So, I would understand the invitation to her is the public eviction message to me from the host for a lady-inappropriate reason if I am a visitor to a non-public-mating related event.

If the event is hosted in my own place, I would have to ask the inviting patron to publicly expose the personal private area to be convincible of the true needs for the invitation to the entitled "outer public-bathroom" to a non-public-mating related event to be evicted for mating with her.at some other places.


----September 19th, 2018

Tuesday, September 18, 2018

09-18-2018 有关私人助理的传言以及月经血计谋 (Rumors about the private assistant and the strategy of period blood)

09-18-2018 有关私人助理的传言以及月经血计谋 (Rumors about the private assistant and the strategy of period blood) 


听说了今天早上的播出是中国政府代表所强调的:如果我妈妈还活着,就没可能没有她自己的男人。据说这是中国政府所推广的“这才叫婚姻自由”。
I heard of this morning's broadcasting that Chinese government's representatives emphasized: If my mother indeed still alive, it is impossible that she still does not have a man of her own. It is rumored this is the theme of this propaganda from the Chinese government "Freedom of marriage."

据说特意会以这种中国聪明中国策略让我父母必须以已经死亡身份离开中国,就可以让我父母永远不再是夫妻而让他们自己这群靠着舔女人月经血才能有口饭吃的可以有机会吃口饱饭。所以我说中国政府的这一政治局根本就是特别选拔的全世界都知道的典型传统的妓院婊子才养得出来杂种组成的公共厕所政治局。
It is rumored that it was from the Chinese strategy and the Chinese smartness that my parents left China with real death certificates. It was intended to break their marriage in order to fill-in replacements from their own who are willing to suck money out from the period blood. This is precisely the reason I say this administration is the specially selected group, according to worldwide standard of traditions, the public bathroom of whore-born mother-fuckers.

所以我说这届中国政府根本是篡党夺权,就因我从自己的亲身经历,我很相信海外传言他们就是靠着共舔一泉月经血才被特意提拔成为这一届中国政府中共中央政治局的,他们的才华就是共舔一腔月经血,哪里会听得懂党纪国法或者科学技术都是什么意思,你就听见他们在使劲用中国外交部中国人民解放军的实力帮着卖髀抢鲷了。那才叫只要广播一响,全世界都知道那是中国那一群口舔月经血的外交解放大军都是在帮着脱衣卖髀呐。
This is exactly the reason I say this administration of the Chinese government is the result of usurping, it is from my own personal experiences, I truly believe it is possible as rumored that this administration (Central Political Committee) is specially grouped from one-woman's period-blood enjoyers. If their talents recognized are enjoying one-woman's period as a group, why should anyone expect them to understand laws or regulations, or anything else? All one could hear is the joint-power from the Chinese Military and Chinese Liberation Army and how hard it is to liberate the breasts and butts for everyone to enjoy the joy of sucking some period-blood. It has been such a phenomenon for the world to listen what a joy it would be to be liberated for period-blood sucking.

所以,我只好郑重声明:我替我母亲我父亲所安排的一切都是不可以由其婚姻另一方或其他子女所继承福利,包括目前及未来的医疗保险及退休金房子等所有安排。我希望我自己的父母如果还活着,看到这个博客可以保护好他们自己。
So, I make my announcement here: All the arrangements I made for my birth parents (including medical insurance, retirement financial arrangement, housing, etc) cannot be inherited by their marriage partners if they have, nor their other child, nor step-children if they have. I wish they could read this blog to protect themselves if they are still alive.

全是这种妓院狗屎公共马桶货言论居然被公然叫做新文化运动。完全违反本人意愿,被政府及文化部门公然绑架强迫逼迫所谓名人必须做这种娼妓文化运动的表率,就因为他们自己是一群真真实实婊子养的妓女妓男。
All these low cast shits are now be called new culture movement. Completely ignore one's own willingness, but purely abusive abducting efforts from the government to force so-called Famous people to be the Role Models of the True Shits, just because themselves are the true whore-born toilets' shits.

我是不会愿意看见我爷爷对我的祝福被靠舔月经血的给坑蒙拐骗了。我妈要是还在,还真是已经够老了,76岁了,没那月经血可以被人舔,我也绝不会用我爷爷给我的钱给那恶心讨饭的一口舔了月经的饱饭钱。
I am not willing to watch my grandfathers' blessing to me to be abused by those period-suckers. If my mother still alive, she is really old enough (76 years old now) to have any period blood. I refuse to pay any of my grandfathers' entrusted money I inherited to such disgusting period-sucker beggars.


----方敏于2018年9月18日。


据说,这些都是因为我爷爷的那个私人助理和我奶奶有性交关系。1949年时,已育有四名子女的我奶奶都已经37岁了又黑又丑又胖,但就是嘴馋爱偷吃。我听说的:
It is rumored, all these was because that my grandmother had sexually involved with the private assistant. Being a mother of four, my not-pretty at all grandmother was already 37 years old and fat enough, but it seems she just had this lust-appetite. What I have heard are the following:

1: 据说我奶奶和那个私人助理的偷情关系是我父亲1956年在上海长居期间,就是不够资格参加我爷爷付款的每日家庭晚餐的原因,而由我奶奶自愿自己留在家里做点给我父亲吃吃,然后我奶奶再自己一个人加入由我爷爷付款的家庭晚餐。
!: It is rumored this sexual involvement was the reason that my father was not allowed to attend daily family dinner function which had been financed entirely by my grandfather. It is said that my grandmother would voluntarily prepare something for my father to eat at home but herself would join the family dinner function later.

2:我知道的,我奶奶共育有四名子女,我父亲和我父亲的小妹妹随我爷爷长相,我父亲的大妹妹和弟弟随我奶奶长相。我听说的:据说是我奶奶自己对我父亲的弟弟说丁姓私人助理就和父亲一样。但丁姓私人助理是在我父亲的弟弟已经8岁以后才被我爷爷雇佣的。
2: What I know: My grandmother gave birth to total four children, my father and my father's younger sister were obviously resemble my grandfather, the other two obviously resemble my grandmother herself. What I heard: It was my grandmother herself told her younger son that the private assistant was the father equivalent. But the private assistant was hired when my father's younger brother was already about 8 years old.

3:我爷爷据说是在1948年替我在香港设立了五百万大洋(一千五百万美金)的信托后,就把家里剩余财产(20万左右的大洋)全部放在了我奶奶的名下,但在我奶奶1957年左右因病住院期间,又紧急转回我爷爷自己名下。
3: It is said that my grandfather had put all that was had left (200,000 Dayang) to my grandmother's name after he set up the Trust for me in Hong Kong (500Million Dayang, $15 Million U.S.dollar). But he had to transferred all back to his own name when my grandmother was hospitalized in 1957.

4:据说我爷爷在1965年去世时,把我父亲的那一份所应继承财产(两万元人名币左右)全部给了丁姓助理,就是替我父亲还了我奶奶的那一份怀孕钱。都知道我父亲从出生起就是由我的曾祖母一手带大的。除了1956年我父亲离开部队考上南京大学之前的那一年,就从未和我奶奶共住一个屋檐下。
4: It was said that my grandfather gave my father's entire inheritable(about ¥20,000) to the private assistant in 1965 was to pay my father's debt of my grandmother's pregnancy-fee. It was well-known my father was raised by my great-grandmother ever since he was born. Other than that one year between my father left the Army and attained college, he never shared one roof with my grandmother.

5:我还想补充说一下,据我所听说的,如果我父亲不是我奶奶的头胎子,就算我奶奶很漂亮,我爷爷都一定会被张爱玲的父亲逼着离婚的。众所周知,张爱玲自传就提到当年19岁20岁的张爱玲为情自杀,她父亲是千里迢迢到上海找那富家子算账未果。我奶奶娘家可是没有一点家世背景的,而我爷爷家自古就有继承人的母亲是母后娘娘的传统,否则,世家子弟的张爱玲父亲是绝不会善罢甘休的。据说我爷爷当时是愿娶,但张爱玲绝不肯做小。
5: I want to add a bit more here: From the rumors I heard, if my father was not my grandmother's first born, my grandfather would be forced to have a divorce even if my grandmother was a rare beauty. From the famous Chinese writer's autography, Miss Zhang committed suicide when she was 19 or 20 years old, her father went to Shanghai to take care of the matter but got no results. My grandmother was not from a huge name nor a big house, but my grandfather's family has this tradition historically that the mother of the heir has a King Mother's privilege. Otherwise, Zhang's father, who was from a historic house as well, wouldn't swallow her daughter's miserable experience. It is rumored that my grandfather was willing to wed her but she was not willing without his divorce.

6:至于为什么私人助理家里及我父亲的弟妹们都认为我奶奶是会为了丁姓私人助理而放弃她自己所育所养亲生子女利益的,我还没听说这情有多深,但似乎这是目前上海普遍共识,也就是我爷爷的一切是我奶奶会愿意统统都给丁姓私人助理的。
6: Regarding why the private assistant's family or my father's siblings have assumed my granmother would choose the private assistant over her own borns, I have not heard their romance story yet to know how deeply they were involved. But it seems it is widely understood in Shanghai that my grandmother would willing to give everything that my grandfather had owned to the private assistant instead of her own borns,

7:我本人郑重声明我爷爷方智仁1948年替我在香港设立的信托从未被我奶奶向其他人提及,我爷爷方智仁也从未更改过该信托。我本人已经在2004年6月30日继承该信托。我爷爷奶奶的婚姻是他们自己的问题。----方敏
7: So, I make my announcement here: The Trust my grandfather Fang, Zhiren set up for me was never bleached by my grandmother, my grandfather never changed his settler's will as well. I inherited this Trust on June 30th of 2004. My grandparents' marriage is their own story.


---- 2018年9月18日。

Monday, September 17, 2018

09-17-2018 The Ownership Confusion and the Infamous Private Assistant

09-17-2018 The Ownership Confusion and the Infamous Private Assistant 

If I see my mother alive on Boston's streets, what will be the scene? I guess she will be the crying one, I would be the hugging one. We have been like this since I was several years old. If that is my father, it would be we are both crying ones.

There are some questions if my parents need to pay income taxes if they still alive and have received the "retirement plan" payment. They don't need to. It is the same if one support one's parents or child on a monthly basis while living separately, it is still one's taxed-income that used to support the family. It is a retirement plan that I bought to support their living expenses which are paid by my Trusts. The payment is a portion of my income that is after investor-tax already. 

I Also heard about this morning's broadcasting of the argument about R Fund. I have no idea what the argument is about. My inheriting is Trust-Inheriting which means I inherited some Trusts. The Trust is similar to a 401K retirement plan in a lot of ways. It is a monthly deposit from an employed to a 401K plan in order to have good future monthly income, my Trust is a onetime deposit done by my grandfather so that I can have handsome yearly income; The retired wish good monthly payment can be received from the 401K plan but don't really know how it can be achieved or what might have happened during the investment, I am the same. I have great entrusting & business groups to take care of investments, I am good without knowing details. It is true I have announced some investments related to 4 Trusts I inherited because I need to complain about the rumors I heard which is I am provided via them, but how come I have not received any money to cover my living expenses yet.

This is precisely the reason why I am asking every confused family to keep an eye on their younger ones. All these providing via those paying companies are done through my entrusting groups' arrangements in order to provide for my living expenses, I am currently living on welfare because of some confusions from the business investment I have no idea of. I am asking these confused families to do me a favor to direct all your confusion about the lawful ownership of paying companies to your attorneys or to the paying companies. Please tell your younger generation don't take my money unless they have the lawful evidence to prove the payment amount is not from my entrusted-money.

About the private assistant family, this is the family I never heard of even I spent five years in their home-city Shanghai, I need to save my food expenses from my ¥50 monthly living expense while they could have about $8000 per month (in U.S. dollar, the exchange rate was $1 > ¥6 ) was possibly the reason I was never introduced. I never heard of this private assistant's family before my mother's wedding gift story is a True statement. I never had anything to do with this private assistant family is a Trust statement as well.

All I heard about this private assistant have been the following:

1: He started to work for my grandfather as a private assistant after my father joined the Chinese Army in 1949. His family name was different from his birth father's,

2: He started to join my grandparents' family breakfast & dinner daily in a year or so and how, one by one, he brought in his wife and his children daily until my grandfather passed away in 1965.

3: In 1965, He insisted on being a member in family-inheriting which was my father's share. My father has been famous for did not get a penny at all from my rich grandfather.

4: In 1966, He sent my mother's wedding gift from my grandfather's friends to Nanjing city which was taken later, which was every piece, by his girlfriend from my mother's maiden sister's house. It is rumored that is a mother of one of his illegitimate children.

5: In 1967, he detained my $10,000 living-expense providing which had been paid by a Ford's holding investor since July 31st of 1967 till October of 1996. This was the period of the entire time since I was born until I left China came to the United States. The amount this private assistant detained was $9000 in U.S. dollar per month between 1967 to mid-70s, and $8000 in U.S. dollar per month from mid-70s till October of 1996.

6: In March to September of 2018, I heard his children and his relatives have been fighting for their "deservedness to own at least some shares" of the $10,000 story's paying company which has been Ford's Holding investor-company.

7: Today, September 17th of 2018, I heard his children are fighting currently to have the "deserved ownership power" over a Rockefeller Holding's investor-company.

8: Plus, how despised this private assistant's family has been towards my grandmother,  my father and I.


----September 17, 2018

Sunday, September 16, 2018

09-16-2018 如果自己家里有曾经在国外办理过信托之类的故事,应该如何查询(How to inquire if you have a family story of entrusting)

09-16-2018 如果自己家里有曾经在国外办理过信托之类的故事,应该如何查询。(How to inquire if you have a family story of entrusting)


就我知道的,信托是有专门的法律登记处的,但零零总总到处都是,所以最好是通过当地警方查询。举例:如果家里的故事是家里的老人是在香港办理的信托,这个信托里的钱如果是在香港进行投资的话,应该会有在香港的工商登记,但信托登记本身却有可能是在香港,大英帝国的英国本土,加拿大,澳大利亚等等的各个城市以及各个州郡政府,所以通过英国警方查询比较现实。(From what I learned so far, there is also a government registry for Trust all over the places. Example, If your family story is a Trust set up in Hong Kong, there would be a commercial registry if the money has been investing in Hong Kong,  but the Trust registry itself can be in Hong Kong, cities or counties in the UK, Canada or Australia, etc.) It is obviously more practical to inquiry through the government's law system.

我自己的查询是通过写信给美国的FBI,我的信托管理人没有问题,因为我所求助的其实是为什么在我2004继承之后没有按时收到生活费用给付,但生活费用给付钱款其实已经按时按决定汇出,所以不是信托管理人的问题,至于究竟什么原因造成, 除了我前几天博文所谈到的钱财的法律拥有权困扰之外还有什么原因,也还在处理当中。如果有意向警方写信求助的,我估计警方的调查就是如此进行,牵涉法律的问题警方按照法律进行处理,其他民事管理问题就是通知信托管理人处理(比如通知受益人继承信托,等等)。我是2015年1月开始向FBI写信谈我的信托继承经历并尽可能地提供我所知道的线索。(I started my own inquiry since January of 2015 by writing letters to FBI referenced with everything I remembered about my inheriting experience. My entrusting-groups are good because my exact inquiry was why I have not received the expected living-providing after my 2004 inheriting. Currently, what I heard is all the living-providing has been provided by the Trusts on-time and as decided on July 1st of 2004. So, my inquiry has nothing to do with my entrusting groups, but it seems what might be the reasons, other than investing-ownership confusion, that caused the delay of my receipt of the money is still under investigation. I assume this is how the investigation is conducted if one send such inquiry to laws: Investigators take care of those matters that are beyond civil disputes but leave everything else to the entrusting-group (such matter as it would be the entrusting-group to inform the inquirer to inherit. etc.).

我和华裔社区及中国政府的矛盾就在于自2004年起,他们就全跑到工商登记那里”查证“2004年的会议内容,然后对着信托所投资的企业嚎叫不停。如果对于我是否应该是唯一受益人持异议,也应通过警方查询,而不是他们自己凭着资讯公开的工商登记资料在没有任何法律依据的情况下要求必须以投资人身份拥有并管理信托所投资的企业。就我所听说的,更大的问题是,当地警方进行查询的结果已经向他们解释,按照法律以及信托设立人的遗嘱,他们确实不是信托的受益人,他们的反应似乎是咬牙切齿“就是不信”,我听到的是一片“就是没法理解,就是 必须解决”。(My issue with Chinese communities abroad and the Chinese government is: Since 2004, they all went to the commercial registry to validate what they heard from 2004's meetings and yell at Trusts-investments ever since. If the dispute is if I am the sole beneficiary, the inquiry should be conducted through law enforcement instead of checking the public records of the commercial registry and insisted on to own and to manage the investment company as an investor but without any legal validating documents of their ownerships nor any valid authorization. According to what I heard, the bigger issue is: After the local law enforcement has answered their inquiry and has told them they are not the beneficiary person according to the Trust's Settler's will and local Trust & Inheriting laws, it seems their reactions were only grudging teeth and refusal to acknowledge, all I heard are all about "it is hard to understand that inheriting can be like this, this dispute has to be resolved." )

有什么需要他们理解的?有什么必须要解决的?作为钱财的主人,信托设立人爷爷当年没打算把钱给他们,信托唯一受益人的我如今也没打算把钱给他们,就凭着法律,就凭财产所有权的法律归属就已经很明确了,哪里还需要向他们特别解释?凭什么必须要我拿钱出来必须解决他们的要求?(Who and what needs their understanding? What needs to be resolved? Being the lawful owner of the money, my grandfather was the Seller of the Trust who had no intention to give them that money, I am the beneficiary person who has no intention to give them that money. This is very clear already by law and by lawful ownership, why I owe them a special explanation? Why I have to give out my money as they demanded to resolve their own dispute?)

他们那支的家里老人作为设立人的儿子在设立人爷爷去世的当年就有分到过家产,他们自己当时也还没生出来,设立人爷爷哪里会需要他们理解?我本人根本不认识他们也没听说过他们,我哪里会需要他们理解?凭什么就是需要我给个解释,解释什么?他们拿不到他们想要的钱,就是坚决没法理解还事不罢休,这不是敲诈勒索是什么?结果是中国政府出面撑腰助阵的漫天痛骂,“凭什么就你有钱?” 就这,我和中国政府能没矛盾吗?(Being a son to the Settler, their branch's senior had the family inheriting at the year when the Settler passed away, and themselves were not born yet, why would the Settler need their understanding? I never even heard of their existence, why I need their understanding? Why I have to give them an explanation? what I need to explain to them? And the attitude is all won't stop till I resolve this dispute by backing off from claiming sole beneficiary and give them the money. Is this an effort of extortion or what? And as you heard, all these shits of anger flying all-over by the strong support from the Chinese government. "How dare you say it is all your money?" Now you can imagine how huge the issue has been.)

他们当中,很多人和我还没血缘关系,他们就是抱怨对钱的法律上的归属弄不清,究竟是那笔钱他们弄不清?什么原因弄不清?钱财的拥有权是有明确法律所严格规范的,为什么不上民事法庭打诉讼官司,或要求刑事调查?( A lot of them don't even have any blood association with me. They are just so confused about who owns the money. Exactly, what money? for what reason? Money's ownership is strictly regulated by laws, why not files a civil lawsuit or request a criminal investigation?)

按照各国法律,所有从事商业经营的机构及个人必须进行工商登记。所有办理过工商注册登记的合法公司的利润都是按照当地法律必须交给其在工商注册上有效登记的合法投资人的。在中国也是如此。就没有任何一家合法有效注册的公司是没有法律上的合法拥有者的。(According to laws of most of the countries, all commercial activities need to be registered lawfully through the commercial registry. All lawfully registered organizations have each's lawfully registered investor-owner. This is the same in China as well. There is no such lawfully registered organization that does not have a lawful registered investor-owner. )

这些人一口一声说那些公司包括那些公司的利润所得就根本没有任何投资人在合法拥有着,也就是说那些公司的员工全是痴呆,一年到头上班就只拿工资奖金, 他们作为一个就只是想要钱的外国人而已,就可以对着公司员工吆喝必须必须拿钱来,公司员工就必须必须把利润所得给他们,还不给就是不行,因为公司员工就是必须解决他们这个”就是不明白就是不理解“的问题?这还就只是因为他们是中国公民而已,这世上有个中国政府还有个中国外交部而已?他们这些人还很奇怪为什么会有几十个国家都是由各个政府在大声强调都是有法律有政府的国家?美国英国法国西班牙当时都已经大声强调不光都有政府,还都有军队啦。(Their saying is all those companies don't even have a lawful owner to take in profits or to own the companies' assets. So it is equally saying those who work for those companies are all so stupid to work full time all year-round to take in only salaries & bonus. And them, being complete foreigners who just want some money, of course, should yell at those stupid people to demand some money, and to expect the demand to be fulfilled as a mandatory order, because it is those stupid people's obligation to resolve the dispute of "hard to understand why it can't be so". And, it seems this is all because they came from China, and China has a government equipped with a Foreign department. So, as you heard, the U.S. the U.K, France and Spain, all have to use high-pitched voices to emphasize each have a government as well and each equipped with the military.)

还有,我是在2004年美国东部时间的6月30日继承,不是2004年的7月1日,我本人对于2004年7月1日当天是否有人继承财产也完全不清楚。如果有人在2004年7月1日参加了电讯会议认为是在继承钱财,请向其他人士查询。2004年的6月30日及7月1日的会议类似于政府机关或者公司的大会议室办公,你办你的,我版我的,参加会议的来访人都是由各自的接待人员处理各自的问题的,清清楚楚。如果你在那天的会议上应该有财产可以继承,那天的会议上就会有知道你所继承的的应该是些什么财产的接待人员。(Also, my inheriting was on June 30th of 2004 (U.S. Eastern time), not July 1st of 2004. I did not hear if there is anyone inheriting on July 1st of 2004 as well, please inquire someone if there is any question regarding a possible July 1st of 2004 inheriting. The June 30th and July 1st meetings were similar to the one-hall office that each visitor had own recipient to take care each's matter. If you were there to inherit, somebody there should know what your inheritable were.)

我本人不是在2004年的7月1日继承的(美国时间),也没听说过那天是否有人在会议上继承财产,所以请不要因为你们自己的钱财继承困扰对我本人及向我提供服务的机构实施骚扰。如果对我方敏有钱感到困扰,请向美国警方提供线索法律依据为何我有钱会让你困扰。(My own inheriting was not on July 1st of 2004 and I did not hear any inheriting rumor from that day, so please do not harass me nor my service providers if you have your own inheriting-confusion about July 1st of 2004. If why I have money is what confuse you, please tip the U.S. law enforcement about reasons)

----2018年9月16日。

Saturday, September 15, 2018

09-15-2018 If my mother has been well & Why Chinese are so angry with me(如果我妈妈一直都生活的挺好的 & 为何华人很讨厌我)

09-15-2018 If my mother has been well (如果我妈妈一直都生活的挺好的)

I agree she just needs to take good care of herself; 我同意她就只要照顾好她自己就可以了,
I agree she just needs to find my father to take good care of my father;我同意她就只要找到我爸爸照顾好我爸爸就可以了;

I wish her to be happy as she has been for the years to come; 我希望她就这样快快乐乐的直到永远,
I wish her to be healthier and healthier in the years to come; 我希望她在未来的日子里健健康康的直到永远;

I say, Papa and Mama:
your permanent financial independence from pension-providing are ensured already;
我会说:

爸爸妈妈,让你们经济可以永远独立的退休金供给已经保障了。

Mama, enjoy your affluence as you wish and forever;妈妈,请按你心愿好好享受你所满意的富足生活,会永远如此,
Papa, enjoy your independence with Mama before I reach out to dictate you both. 爸爸,在我对你们指手画脚之前,请和妈妈一起好好享受你们的这份独立生活。

----Sept 15th, 2018


About this morning's broadcasting of why a lot of Chinese are so angry with me. (有关今天早上所播出的为何华人很讨厌我)

1: Chinese dislike radio broadcasting of those fake romances, (1:华人不喜欢广播上的假恋爱故事)
My saying: I have complained to laws about possible sexual harassment.(我已经向法律投诉是否这是性骚扰。)

2: Chinese dislike I say I have achievements.(2: 华人不喜欢我说我有成就)
My saying: I have complained to the laws about if broadcasting those blackmails to denial my achievement is to take over my intellectual income. (我已经向法律投诉广播所播出一些内容是否是在造谣诽谤对我的成就加以否定以掠夺我的智慧产权收入。)

3: Chinese dislike I say I am wealthy. (3: 华人不喜欢我说我很有钱)
My saying: My Trust-inheriting is a real true statement. I have complained to the laws about all the negative impacts on my life that are caused by this money's lawful ownership confusion. (我的信托继承是真实的事实,我已经向法律投诉所有这些针对财产的法律所有权的困扰对我生活所造成的负面影响。)

----Sept 15th, 2018




Friday, September 14, 2018

09-14-2018 The Cousins (五福内的亲戚)

09-14-2018 The Cousins (五福内的亲戚)

Among all my cousins from my grandfather, cousin Zhang is the eldest grandchild of my grandfather from my father's eldest younger sister. He has been who we have been looking up to since we were in elementary school and he is the most handsome one. He has been blessed with everything that is good from his both parents, which makes me so envious because I am the joined-dissatisfactions of my both parents. We grew up in different cities and I was a what-happened beauty to him when I started college in Shanghai, but we stayed aloof during my entire college years in Shanghai. 在我爷爷所有的孙子女中,我父亲的大妹妹所育的张家表兄是我爷爷最大的孙子。从小学起,他就是我们这些一等亲的小家伙们都应该学习的榜样,他也是我们当中长得最英俊的一个。他实在是太幸运了,他是他父母双亲所有优点的完美结合;我实在是太嫉妒了,我是我父母双亲所有自认缺点的综合体。我们从小就在不不同的城市长大,我到上海上大学的时候,我是他“哪有可能”的难以置信美女。整个大学五年期间,虽然都在上海,但我们之间完全没有任何联络。

Now, his blessed all-goodness has been such a wonderful joint with a real-beauty wife and a lovely child, while I am still struggling with the worldwide public doubts of "do you ever have a loving romance at all?" So, I will follow his advise of "don't say a lot", and I will "leave him alone" to his wonderful marriage. 这么多年之后,他的一切美好又添了一个很美好的“共同体”---- 一个确实很美丽的妻子和一个可爱的孩子, 而我,却是在面对着全世界对我"是否曾有任何男人爱过“的公众舆论质疑。所以,我会听从他”不要多言“的建议,我也会“别烦他”,让他可以安静的在他自己的美丽婚姻中流连。

Inside five cousins that traditionally called relatives, I am the only girl among my first cousins*, the only girl among my same family name second cousins, and possibly also the only girl among my same family name third cousins because I heard this morning's girl-cousins are my same family-name fourth cousins.  在传统的五等亲里面,我是一等亲里唯一的女孩,二等堂亲里唯一的女孩,从今天早上所播出的那几个女孩是四等堂亲这点来推测,我估计我也是三等堂亲里唯一的女孩,

They are obviously angry at our shared grandfathers because they don't feel being the spoiled girls as their loving parents have let them feel. Well, the youngest generation grandfather we share was the first-generation big donor of the Chinese college education in Republic of China time and died as a citizen of the Republic of China around the year of 1910, which was before their fathers were born if their fathers are much younger than 100 years old. So, I can imagine our shared grandfathers would just say this to them: "Hey, why are you so jealous? My child has been spoiling you ever since you were born, why you say he is not the representative of my love?" 今天早上这几个女孩很明显是极其的愤怒,对我们共同的爷爷们没像他们自己父母那样宠爱她们很是气愤。可是,我们最年轻的一代共同的爷爷,就是中国大学教育的第一代大捐款人的那个爷爷,是在1910年左右就去世了,如果这几个女孩的父亲还没到100岁的年纪,那1910年可是这几个女孩的父亲还没出生的年份。所以,我想象我们共同的爷爷们会对这几个女孩说:“嗨,你干嘛这么嫉妒啊?我们的孩子可是从你一出生就那么宠你爱你,你为什么说他不是在代我们表达对你的爱?”

But, how come I can be so lucky to be spoiled directly from my grandfathers? That is not only because I am their girl-grandchild but also because I am the rare species of a girl who carries their birthmark. I am the nicknamed their ”palms(birthmark) girl" who they had been expecting since the realization of "It has been all boys for so long already" which was about 2500 years long at the year when I was born. All these Trust-gifts to me are the recognition of "welcome a girl join this all-boys team". That is all. 可是,那我为什么这么幸运可以被我的爷爷们直接宠着?这不只是因为我是他们的孙女,更因为我是很罕见的一个长着他们共同的胎记的孙女。自从我爷爷们意识到“怎么这么多年来有胎记的都是男孩”之后,我爷爷们就是用“掌纹(胎记)孙女”来称谓我这个他们一直都在期待着的孙女,在我出生的那年,”这么多年来“指的是2500年来。所有我收到的这些信托礼物,都是在表达认可”欢迎加入这个全部男孩的团队“。就这些了。

*I had a girl first cousin died at several years old age.我曾有过一个一等亲的表妹,她在几岁时夭折了。

----Sept 14th, 2018






Thursday, September 13, 2018

09-13-2018 什么是世态炎凉?

09-13-2018 什么是世态炎凉?


现在据说在华人社区传开了我当年托付对我父母的照顾时,除了安排他们有和我一样的医疗保险照顾之外,还给他们安排了一份零花钱。我母亲的零花钱应该是她所居住地区的初级中级会计师的退休工资,我父亲是所居住地区的国家科学院高级退休科学家的退休工资。我当时做这样的安排就是因为我母亲从八十年代失去工资退休金后最大的抱怨就是没有了她自己的一份独立收入,想买点什么都得和我父亲要钱,所以我做女儿的收到我父系爷爷的礼物后的就从那里面给了我爷爷们的好媳妇这么一份退休工资。我母亲结婚以后真是除了照顾我父亲,就是干家务养大我和我弟弟,完全就没有她自己,有好吃的就是我们爷仨的,有好穿的也是我们爷仨优先,她要是用自家的缝纫机给她自己做了一件衣服也是在我身上穿着。所以,我给她一份从照顾我的生活这个工作上退休的退休金,由我爷爷给我的礼物里出钱就是天经地义。我母亲要是还在,就已经收到了我的四个爷爷出钱由我给付的的退休金了。我父亲估计是绝对不会给我妈退休金啦,铁了心要让我妈照顾他一辈子啦。我也给了我父亲同样的一份退休金礼物,今后我花钱还是存钱,他就不用絮絮叨叨了,他退休了。这退休金的起始日期,我母亲是2004年7月1日起,我父亲是在他离开中国后(因为他在国内已有退休金了,不需要重叠)。这退休金礼物是一笔付清,支付给代办机构后每月独立给付,不是每月由我的会计师转账。

据说有些漫天遍地要找我父母信息的就是因为要么想要通过广播剧宣布的方式想让他们这些人自己领取我给我父母的这一份退休金,要么就是想找到他们必须让他们继续承担“抚养义务”。我希望我的父母还活的好好的,过的好好的,可以看的这个博文,保护好他们自己。

我的愤怒是,不管一些人相不相信这些从2004年就有的传言,都是我父亲以他自己中国科学院的高工资高退休金及福利待遇在满足我母亲作为他的妻子和他自己亲生孩子的母亲对生活的美好向往。我母亲虽然在八十年代失去了工作和退休金,但她从来不是在讨口饭吃。为何现在的国内外华人的舆论宣传就是我母亲我父亲不应该有一份他们自给自足的美好生活?为什么中国政府所做的舆论宣传就是我不应该也不会准许我自己照顾抚养我长大的我自己的亲生父母,而是应该把我的合法钱财归为公共厕所功能所有以作为厕所马桶的粪坑屎臭奖金?中国政府及海外华裔社区如此宣传的目的除了敲诈勒索,讹诈钱财,还有什么?我父母在“去世”之前都是中国公民,理应受中国国家法律保护,却是只有中国政府出面组织的一片谩骂质问“凭什么有钱?”

亲兄弟明算账,究竟是谁认为我合法钱财在法律的财产拥有权上有争议?为何就是不通过法律寻求答案?我本人就是在完全没有任何财产信息的请况下,完全是按照法律继承了我早已去世的爷爷们所信托给我的财产,按照同样的法律,我就没有任何可能继承到任何其他人的一分钱财。

如果任何人对我的法律信托继承有任何质疑,都是应该咨询法律,而不是漫街吆喝只要你们这些人自己没拿到钱,就是这世上根本就没有法律,甚至不准我拥有我自己的合法财产使用我自己的合法钱财,不准我作为美国公民享受由美国宪法所保障的言论自由说我自己有钱。你对我叫嚣吆喝,我就是向法律举报你敲诈勒索,讹诈钱财。我确实是就此已经全部向美国的警方投诉了。


09-11-2018 Who has been paying for my expenses?

04-18-2018 都是有关我的方家亲戚以及方家后人的

06-16-2018 就我的信托继承,我给方家后人和方家亲戚的一份说明

----2018年9月13日。




Wednesday, September 12, 2018

09-12-2018 89年学运这一群人和我之间的矛盾究竟是什么?

09-12-2018 89年学运这一群人和我之间的矛盾究竟是什么?


听说了今天早上的女军官故事。她是89年学运成员来了美国,嫁了一个美国人丈夫又有一些很名人的美国军方同事。

我和89年学运这群人的根本矛盾从来就不是什么政治上的对立,因为对年的学运认知就是他们是一群爱国的学生,所以我和89年学运这群人的根本矛盾其实在于:
  • 因为当年的轰轰烈烈,他们是打心眼里瞧不起我一点声音都没有的风格;
  • 我是从1989年起就认为他们很幼稚园,所以很成年人的我从来就没看见过他们。
我不清楚很多事情,因为我过去几年生活中的经历,依据美国法律所赋予我的法律权益,我确实已经投诉了我是否被有组织地进行了性骚扰。

就这些啦。

----2018年9月12日。

Tuesday, September 11, 2018

09-11-2018 Who has been paying for my expenses?

09-11-2018 Who has been paying for my expenses?


From all the angry voices, it is obvious that the anger is from the confusion regarding the money ownership, it is definitely not any romance confusion.

*Reason: All of them are not from the three big U.S. rich names. The anger is about my very expensive invisible high-tech security and very expensive remote medical expenses. Plus, my daily living expenses such as housing and food, have been covered by the U.S. government's welfare system's Section 8 housing project and Food Stamps (SNAP), obviously never any rich man's any money (updated on 09-12-2018)*.

Very simple way to ease the anger: Money's ownership by LAW.

So,

Please do not request to stop any payment of my expenses, without presenting any lawful evidence of the ownership of the amount of the payment;

Please do not take away any money payment of my expenses, without presenting any lawful evidence of the ownership of the amount of the payment;

Please do not harass or interrupt any paid-already service providers of mine, without presenting any lawful evidence of the ownership of the amount of the payment;

Please do not harass anyone for any money payment of my expenses, and

Please consult the paying company or your own attorneys regarding your confusion.


If there is anyone confused because of romance, please contact your own male or your attorney for your confusion. I will sue you or you both for sexual harassment if you insist on harassing me.



All my father-side grandparents died before I was born, and my parents were both well in 2004. So, it was not a family-inheriting but Trust-inheriting in 2004. 我父系的爷爷奶奶都是在我出生前就已经去世了,我父母2004年也活得很好, 所以我在2004年的继承不是分家产继承(家里刚刚死了人的继承,family inheriting), 而是信托继承。

I only inherited Trusts that I was specified as the sole beneficiary person by the deceased Settler's letter. 我所继承的信托都是由已去世的信托设定人的信托委托书制定我是唯一受益人。

So, if there is any confusion regarding Trust-inheriting from my father-side associated, please consult your attorney. I will report extortion to the law enforcement if you insist on harassing for "your share of the money" that I did not take and don't have. 所以,亲兄弟明算账,如果我父系一方的相关人士,有任何关于我2004信托继承的疑问,请向你们自己的律师咨询,如果你坚持向我索要我从未拥有也从未拿过的所谓“你的那份钱”,我会向警方举报你敲诈勒索。


----Sept 11th, 2018

Monday, September 10, 2018

09-10-2018 Rumored broadcasting of "Never heard of this Min Fang" from the JPM Chase management

09-10-2018 Rumored broadcasting of "Never heard of this Min Fang" from the JPM Chase management

I heard there are a lot of people want to confront my saying about JPM Chase on the public channels.
I have no problem to be confronted, but I do request the challenger to declare the knowledge possessed for the privilege to challenge on a public channel as such a privileged knowledgeable voice. It takes much more than "freedom of speech" to be on a public channel is the reason I request so. (09/11/2018)

I stand by the truthfulness and authentication of my account on the changing process that I published on my web blog.

09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase

Some Clarifications:

1: The table "Force analysis table" illustrated my contributions.

The table is my MBA 503 Leading Organizational Change's homework "Force analysis table" in July of 2018, not any table of the technology projections from before mid of 2005-time from JPM Chase's management,

The table of this "Force analysis" illustrates my contributions of "What needs to change" was done before July of 2005, because the massive "how to change" already started at the online application level to serve the JPM Chase clients around July of 2005.


2: JPM Chase management.

JPM Chase (New York Headquartered) was having a merger with Bank One (Chicago Headquartered) since July of 2004.  The CEO retired in Dec. of 2005. Mr. Chief Technology Officer retired in Dec. of 2006, but there was no successor after his retirement, each business line's CTO reports to the Chief Administrative officer.

Its Treasure Lowell technology center I worked at was rumored to be shut down and had a massive layoff since 2006.

I was a contractor and new to JPM Chase, and I only stayed there till January of 2007, so I did not pay attention to any other human resource changes. The change process in JPM Chase, by end of 2006, was already at the GUI (Graphic User interface) level to ensure looks-and-feels of the software( applications) also exactly as Business-requested.


3: How would I know if I was ever heard of? 

The change conducted in JPM Chase was never a non-sense. I am proud of my lifetime achievement to promote Computer technology conversion from innovative invention only to crafted-arts creative technology.  Nobody ever has done this before me for me to copy from.

Without my promotion of the QA importance, not a change that computer technology can change from "Never heard of the super cool thing invented to explore the unknown area", to "practical customer-order to serve the daily business-conducting usage". The difference in-between is as big as the "water-painting portrait" so pretty to have but not really useful, to a "crafted artistic design of home electronic appliances".

WIthout the deep understanding of how quality assurance safeguards pharmaceutical products in every step of its manufacturing, it was impossible a computer programmer could understand that upgrading the academic-expectation for Quality Assurance personnel was so critical in conducting this sweeping change in JPM Chase.

 Not only I was a complete-project independent research programmer who did research on the client/server module (for authentication), the data transmission module and the database module independently for a never-done-before computer security project, but I was also a Quality Assurance personnel with the Inspector working experience from the pharmaceutical industry, the FDA equivalent in China. This was one of knowledge that I had contributed to JPM Chase management team.

Also, on July 1st of 2004, there was a brief conversation when I said I want to work in the financial industry to learn some economic & business, I was welcomed to take a look at its computer technology system since I was a top-notch computer security specialist, but I was not certain if I was welcome to JPM Chase. I was contracted to JPM Chase through a consulting firm from Florida.

----Sept 10, 2018


09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase

Force Analysis Table for Kotter's Change Model's Force Fields Analysis



Sunday, September 9, 2018

09-09-2018 The Story of a Property in Shanghai

09-09-2018 The Story of a Property in Shanghai

It is indeed very funny to hear the yell: "this is already a lawsuit if the husband insists on demanding that money back."

The story is started with a rumor: There is a property owned by me, which is actually owned by the American "Pejoves" Fund company in Shanghai, so, a lot of Shanghai's females who had some sexual intercourse experiences with He, Guoqiang (贺国强)deserved to take it over and actually occupied it to make the company-owned property such a Vagina-closet to serve those who are all obviously not active in-use but for private storage purpose.

My reaction: High pitched voice screaming "Why they occupy my property? Why my house is a Vagina storage? I need to burn this property".

The property's story: So, there went a Hispanic actress lady set the fire on a Shanghai property, I was very happy but she was not. She got a lawsuit in Shanghai because someone tried to pay her to buy that property she never owned, and this morning as you heard, her husband was demanded to pay for the damage to that property.

The confusion: 
  1. The damage to the property has been the expense already on the American "Pejoves" fund company who never asked her newly-wed husband to pay.
  2. The demander is from a French family who are confused about the ownership of the property, also a very good friend to the husband and knows his dating history.
  3. I never had any association with the husband, never even met.
----Sept 9th, 2018


A note:
A lot of people, who include myself, have been concerned about what will be the relationship between me and my biological children if I can't be with them?

Well, I have asked laws help on possible intentional hate-education from those who want or have wanted their father, and I am possibly in the situation of being intentionally abducted a-like by those people as well, but if with all the help I have called, they have still being educated to hate me, I have to say I am a polygamist-male through and through and I am not willing to let myself be around by anyone who hates me. So, I decided it very simply as a biological mother: They are either my children who return my love caring as my own children, or they are never my anyone.

Min Fang
09-09-2018


Saturday, September 8, 2018

09-08-2018 The M family and the Lehman Brother's French Investor

09-08-2018 The M family and the Lehman Brother's French Investor


Heard about the M family has been associated with Lehman Brother's French Investor.
My response:

Ya, but I am just a typical beneficiary person of some Trusts who knows nothing. I claimed the Fund company is because I heard my 2018's expenses have been provided for by this American Fund company according to its French investor's instruction which was an after its company-tax payment, and possibly after its French investor's company-tax payment as well, so I say a Trust I inherited has been its upstream investor, but I don't know anything other than this.

----Sept 8th, 2018

Friday, September 7, 2018

09-07-2018 The Sweeping Chane of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase

About the famous JPMorgan Chase technology upgrade, the complaints have been about if I did what I was asked.
  • I was asked to take a look at this bank's technology network as an outsider security specialist.
  • I did find out there is a security gap between securing physical access to money via internet money-transferring, and regular information security provided by the bank's technology department. 
  • I did help out upgrading the bank's security aspect in physical access to money via internet transferring, by establishing a quality mechanism to let physical access security specialists extend their specialty to include securing internet money-transferring access, with the technology department's help.
----July 15th, 2019


09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase 

I was surprised when I heard the saying has been that nobody knows what I did in JPMChase. I never explained myself to anyone because I thought everyone already knows. The change already happened successfully and my role in this successful change was never denied by anyone from Lowell technology center of JPM Chase, and it is unimaginable that any organizational change can be made so successfully without the entire management knew what needed to change and how to change cascadingly, and change has been replicated throughout the entire U.S. banking industry. Of course, can you imagine any technology executives in the banking industry to have a good night sleep when I was screaming with anxiety "the internet banking-access is a green passage."

The day I stepped into JPM Chase Lowell technology center was July 1st of 2004, the massive firm-wide technology upgrading started only a year later in Mid of 2005, it had been every weekend that there was some major upgrade went online and at the backend offices, how could all these be achieved without the massive managerial efforts?


Following is updated from my school blackboard post of the MBA503 Leading organizational change:




Exactly, what had I contributed to this change as a computer QA contractor in JPM Chase? 

I alerted the management my concern about banking technology and illustrated my vision of the banking industry in the digital era. 

To lead the change, I addressed all these status quo-es I listed in the table to specify what content needed to be included in the standard business requirement for technology people to understand the business objectives for technology projects, and promoted the tech-spec standard should be a shared standard between QA and development as the one and only tech-standard, etc. I had been guided by the management to input my knowledge into JPM Chase's existing best practices, through a series of conflicts between QAs, business interpreters, and developers' group in projects which made me known for confrontational and stubborn. 

How was I technically capable to lead this change?


The Window login replacement project made me a top-notch security personnel in the computer technology system as well as a full-project independent research programmer. I independently achieved prototypes of window login replacement Gina(client)/LSA(server) module, secure data transmission module, LDAP database module as well as helping functions such as admin tool and installer, etc. We only had a total of seven computer-major personnel in that company which included a research director, three programmers in this project, another three full-time in consulting (one had been in San Francisco who only visited the office during yearly holiday seasons).   

Also, it is from my work experience in the pharmaceutical industry, I had learned the QA's great importance in every step of the production which even includes the facilities' designing to hosting the manufacturing.

My personal experience from the change: "QAs and programmers with years' practicing experiences in the technology department were all supportive of changes. They were the group understood what I was changing before the changes in the requirements were clear. It was a sweeping change everywhere in JPM Chase with their enormous support, great changing experience."

How did the change happen in JPM Chase?

The planned change proposed in mid of 2004 was to change the existing situation of " Business units take-in whatever technology support unit can give", to upgrade the technology to make the software or applications to be designed & developed exactly as requested by the business units.


This change plan was overwhelmingly supported by all JPM Chase's business units who had been so fed up with "technology person tells us what we should do about our business through computers". I remembered how technology units across all JPM Chase business lines got affluent funding to upgrade the human resources as well as the computers and related, and how it had been like when there was at least one application successfully upgraded to best serve the business needs each weekend since 2006 (should be mid of 2005). 
The resisting forces were the status quo that technology developing group so got used to telling the business as well as the technical quality assurance group "we already gave the best we can do, what else do you want from us?" or technology groups were complaining "we are the computer person, not a financier, what exactly the business is requesting?", etc. Also, the realistic limits that certain business great requests just can't be achieved by existing known technology as I listed in the above table.
The shift of the equilibrium started after the Business Request was standardized by the Business-technology interpreters, which was followed by the standardizing of the technical specification shared between software(application) developing group and software(application) quality assurance group. With this two major upgrades, the human resource upgrading to enhance the quality assurance team achieved equilibrium change of "What Business requested can be achieved and should be developed exactly as requested." It had been my great experience to be the technological-leader to promote and to watch all these amazing changes.
Another Note:

 I was labeled "never a research type person". It is true that I am not the person enjoy endless devoted hours in a laboratory or in office for the passion of discovery, I am the person just do my job finishing assignment. When I started my research job, my research director was about to retire, I was a commuter planned to get my green card at suburb and to find a better-paid job in New York City, all of our research team was punctual-minute in at 8:30AM or equivalent and right-out at 5 PM sharp. If any guys stayed-in, that was only because they have nothing else to do that day. This was our group and our project-ing style was "tell me what you want, I take a look and do it". 
The boss wanted us to have a project to elevate our computer & security software consulting company, so the IBM well-experienced research director gave us this "impossible project" to expect 3 full-time programmers and 2 full-time helping consulting person to replace Microsoft Window password login, this was a project achievable to his understanding and really suited our boss' ambition. I was the person asking "what do you want from me? I can devote my 8-hours on it here", the guys were all saying "we want the best, super cool technology, I do what I can but I don't have a lot of time for it". So, we achieved this window logon project in 3 years time with 40-hours per week work-on-assignment style.
This was the technology-change I led in JPM Chase's technology upgrading. It was not about how innovative the computer technology can be, it was about how creative the computer technology can be when doing a project on-assignment: "tell us what your business unit need from us technology unit, we will achieve it in our 40-hours per week working time here as in-house project".
----Sept 7th, 2018