My response: Entire time I am saying this Chinese government organized performance is a whore business advertisement.
If Chinese woman choose to be with Chinese guy is only because she is not a loser, is it should be understood by audience that Chinese guys are losers only according to P. R Chinese citizens?
If I do not choose to be with any Chinese guy only means a prove of this, is that imply I have to have a Chinese guy for fxxx only purpose? Is this further imply a Chinese guy is a pig only fxxx-able?
With my analyze above, with another a Chinese female citizen supported by Chinese government officials insist on "have to have a child with a rich stranger" story that radio program also featured, I got the conclusion this is whore ring business organized activities.
----June 28th, 2017.
Why I screamed why this radio program try to impress audience that United States is a colony to People's Republic of China?
My explanation: As a citizen of United States, as a citizen who is ruled by US laws including Constitution, why my US lawful money can be announced on this radio program as denied by Chinese government officials? Why my personal life can be announced by whoever as long as Chinese government officials stand by them?
Evidence: 1:The fund often confused as O'Connor family wealth. This fund is my lawful money according to British laws and US laws, why my lawful ownership constantly insulted by Chinese government officials on this radio program?
2: Yesterday, my representative attorney announced I have inheritance entrusted 2100 years ago represented by him and his announcement was insulted 2 minutes later by a Chinese government stating "she has no money" on the same episode of the same radio program. Is this to say US attorneys announcement according to US laws means nothing at all as long as insults being supported by Chinese government officials?
3: US marriage conducts are freedom granted by US constitution. Why my personal life constantly insulted by Tina O'Connor's "truly felt" as a US Foreign Department employee as long as she got Chinese government officials supports? I decided to sue her to everything she did in US government employee's name.
My statement: There is no Chinese citizen can yell managing my personal matter including my private romance and my private wealth.
----June 28th, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播讲到如果一个中国女人选择和一个中国男人在一起是因为这个女人没用，我方敏不肯要中国男人就说明了这一点。
我的回应：我一直都讲中国政府组织的这场演出根本就是在做妓院卖淫广告。
如果宣布中国女人选择和一个中国男人在一起就是因为这女人没用，这是不是希望世界各国的听众认为中华人民共和国的公民都认为中国自己的男人只是窝囊废而已？
如果进一步宣布我方敏没有选择和中国男人在一起就证明了上述观点，这是不是暗示我应该就只为性交媾而找一个中国男人？这是不是在进一步暗示一个中国男人也就”只是个有屌会操的猪种而已？“
根据我以上的分析，再根据广播剧报道着的中国女公民在中国政府官员支持下坚持"就是一定要和有钱的陌生人生个孩子”的另一个故事，我得出的结论就是：这根本就是一场卖淫集团组织的卖淫活动。
----2017年6月28日，
请参阅
内容大意：中国政府认定只要没看到我的银行存折或缴税记录，在2004年会议上当众宣称是我会计师的人就是在招摇撞骗。我就问当时在场的周小川先生是否衣服上所贴名片（中国人民银行副行长）必须经过中国人大正式核查才能确定周小川先生不是个在会议现场行骗的犯罪分子。
----2017年6月28日。
What else to freak you out? 吓死人的婚姻登记
**吵个没停的主题就是1：中国的女公民才是真正有奶有屁股凭什么是你被外国有名有钱的男人给操了，2：凭什么你说你有钱？3：凭什么你说你真实？4：都是会说英语的，凭什么要看事实？5：外交官都是外语学院毕业的，已经说了不相信你懂电脑，你凭什么坚持说你有成就？What else to freak you out? 吓死人的婚姻登记
最后一段：（我就一直说这中国政府在全世界组织的这场演出基本上是：用"一本正经事实阐述"手法，通过表现花痴症状("谁都在馋又老又干的中国公民男女还馋的口水嗒嗒的”），甲状腺亢进症状（吵个没停叫辩论，叫“真理越辩越明“）来讲述严重精神分裂似的故事观点（“中国政府整个就是腐败下三滥的妓女婊子地痞流氓呀”)。我今天早上都已经痛骂“中国政府国家领导人是妓女婊子养的杂种才会认为只要有洞就应该拿别人的钱。”
----2017年5月30日。）
----2017年6月28日。
我为什么怒吼这广播剧根本就是在向听众申明美国是中国的殖民地而已。
我的解释：作为美国公民，作为受美国法律包括美国宪法所保护及规范的美国公民，为什么我的符合美国法律的财产可以在广播剧上经常性的被中国政府官员加以否认？为什么我私人的生活只要有中国政府官员支持就可以任意被任何人随心所愿任意宣布？
证明： 1： 常被混淆为O'Connor家财产的那个基金。按照英国和美国的法律，基金就是我方敏财产，为什么我的合法拥有基金事实却经常被中国政府官员通过这个广播剧加以挑衅？
2： 昨天, 我的代表律师宣布我有一笔2100年前的信托由他代理，他的声明2分钟以后就被中国政府官员在同一集广播剧里以“她根本就没钱”进行挑衅。这是不是在说只要有中国政府官员支持挑衅，美国律师根据美国法律发表的声明就只是胡说八道而已?
3：美国的婚姻相关法律体现美国宪法所赋予的自由。为什么我私人生活经常被Tina O'Connor 的一句句“我真的这么认为”来挑衅就只因为她是美国外交部雇员且受到中国政府官员的支持？我已经决定就她以美国政府雇员身份所做的（侵犯我私人合法权益)一切诉诸法律。
我的声明：没有任何一个中国公民可以对我的私人事务包括私人财产及私人婚恋进行指手画脚说三道四的行为。
----2017年6月28日