12-31-2018 我的亲朋送礼计划 (12) ---- My online gifting idea -- 《Validation confusion “How you got this conclusion?”》

I heard this morning's broadcasting of some confusion regarding my $400Million yearly providing. （中文附后）

I heard the confusion is from banks that have received this $400Million living expenses payment check titled with Min Fang's name from USTS together with a "lawfully Min Fang's money" validation letter from USJD office. I heard the confusion is because of some shared personal frustration in USTS and in Banks: "how the USJD office can have this 'lawfully Min Fang's money' conclusion with its own statements to explain the obvious otherwise"?

I heard the reading-tips are, for this shared personal frustration in reading this validation letter, :

• 1) there is a same-page prelude paragraph located pretty far above the main validation explanation statement paragraph that is not expected to be ignored. 
• 2) The validation has proceeded with the hypotheses that include "No investor been deprived because of the payment".
• 3) This validation proceeding is because my ancient Trusts' registries are private records.

Well, I heard that $400Million each year for the year between 2015-2019 is lawful living expenses providing money for Min Fang that qualified for investor income tax rate is the conclusion from very tight judicial arguments validation.

I add my own explanations:

• All these U.S. companies' payments are originated from profits of its local business operating, which means any paid-out $400Million is never "unknown source money".
• All according to its lawfully commercially registered investor-owner companies' lawfully valid instructions for my exclusive personal usage, which means any paid-out $400Million is never "any company's pre-company-tax money nor any public relation(PR) money".
• USJD office has never received any valid complaint regarding if any worldwide investor has been deprived at least $400Million each year since the payment, which means any paid-out $400Million is never "anyone else's money" but my lawful money.

I heard this shared personal frustration has aroused a lot of confusion if $400Million is my lawful money or a joking donation, with R's unsolved confusion if this is originated from their family wealth mysteriously without any publicly acknowledged "valid authorization". For this R's confusion, it is explained in this same validation letter that all five years paying companies have not changed any portion of its upstream instructing investors accumulated for over 600 years. R's family wealth was originated in most recent 2--3 centuries which certainly means the same validation letter already explained this $400Million a year from 5 different companies never originated from any R's house. And I say, of course. also not any Ford's house nor any Walton's house. It is so ridiculous that those R's houses never accused their own attorneys nor their own accountants have stolen their money for me, but ridiculously have insisted on my yearly lawfully validly instructed and receivable money has to be from their wealth. 

If any booked service providers of mine share the same frustration, please contact your own legal department on how to validate this information.

----Dec. 31st, 2018


《验证疑云：“你怎么得出这结论的？”》

我听说了今天早上的播出提到我每年的生活费用给付究竟是什么钱的困扰。我听说困扰是一些银行，就是那些收到了USTA的4亿美金“方敏”抬头的支票及附加的USJD的验证了“是方敏的合法钱财”信件的银行。我听说了USTS和银行业很多人共同的困扰就是“USJD明明说了一通为何否定的解释，怎么又结论说确实就是方敏的合法钱财？”

我听说对于这封让很多人纠结不已的USJD办公室的验证信的阅读指南如下：

• 1）这封信的同一页上，有一段前言或序言，离主要段落文章是隔得挺远的，但不应认为是可忽略的。
• 2）验证的推理思维包括验证是否在世界范围内有某些投资人因为给我生活费用而被掠夺了至少4亿美金一年。
• 3）使用这种验证推理逻辑是因为我的古老信托登记都是私人资料不可查询。

我还听说2015-2019年期间的我的每年4亿美金的生活费用给付合法及我本人适用投资人的收入税都已经验证合法，并且验证过程法理逻辑非常严密。

我再加上我自己的解释：

• 所有这些美国公司的付款都是源自这些美国公司在当地经营业务的利润所得，也就是所有这些美国公司所支付的每年4亿美金都不是什么“财产来源不明”的情况。
• 所有这些美国公司的付款都是按照其各自的合法有效的公司注册登记记录上的的投资人指示
• 所支付的，也就是说这4亿美金每年的付款从来不是哪家公司的公款或者哪家公司的公共关系给付。
• 自USTS收到这每年4亿美金的付款后，USJD办公室至今从未接到过世界范围内有哪个投资人被掠夺了四亿美金的投诉，也就是说这每一个4亿美金给付都不是任何其他人的钱，而是我自己的合法钱财。

我听说这份读信纠结造成了很多困扰，也就是这是我的合法钱财还是作弄人的捐款，而R家就一直在怀疑这钱是不是从他们家什么人的什么账号里给左挪右移而捣鼓出来的，就只是没有被那人公开承认确实是那人授权给付的。针对R家的这份困扰，这同一封验证信也证实了所有这些美国公司的4亿美金的给付授权投资公司的投资份额在所累积的600年公司历史上上都没有改动过。R家的财富是在近代的200-300年年里累积的，而付款公司的付款投资人已经是600年没动过其投资份额。所以这每年4亿美金的给付没有任何一年是由R家的任何人所支付的，也不是福特家的任何人或者沃顿家的任何人所支付的。R家从不指责他们自己的工作人员会计师律师等偷了他们家的钱给我用，但就总说我每年都可以收到的并且是明确合法支付的钱就只能是偷了他们家的钱，特别气人。

如果有已经预定向我提供服务的公司及机构也有类似的读信纠结，请联系你们公司的法务部门以核实该信息。

----2018年12月31日。