10-25-2017 The Fund that O'Connors argued about is My Private Wealth Lawfully Owned(O'Connor家在争执的这个基金是我合法拥有的私人财产）

10-25-2017 The Fund that O'Connors argued about is My Private Wealth Lawfully Owned(O'Connor家在争执的这个基金是我合法拥有的私人财产）

Heard this morning's argument about contributions to U.S.(中文附后）
My response: I am a U.S.citizen, I am not the United States.

The fund caused O'Connors families' confusion is my money because it was set up by my grandfather's entrust I inherited lawfully according to his will.

O'Connors contribution to the great United States should be recognized by United States, the great lawful country protect my private wealth as a U.S. citizen's lawfully owned.

Any contribution reward recognition should be directed to Congress Hill, White House, Federal Treasure Department and Federal Bank of the United States. It is inappropriate to belittle the contributors contributions' National Greatness to individual citizen's privately owned wealth.

O'Connors contributions to the Fund that I inherited, the one they are confused because of their grandfather's letter, had been recognized by the Fund appropriately and historically, reflected by incentives paid on time for each deal O'Connors helped to reach and $200 Million per year sized agreed-upon-providing provided for six generations after two generations Attorney O'Connors' total 55 or 65 years working time for the funds as General Counselor.

Further reward of entire size or partial size of the Fund regarding O'Connors families contribution to the Fund is inappropriate. This inappropriateness is the reason that caused mention of corruptions, money laundries and criminal activities on the radio. I did call law enforcement's help regarding some similar rumors I heard.

----Oct. 25th, 2017

**Heard the saying of 1775's speech of independence. 
My response: The fund's 400-500 staffed between 1774-1776 and it was under a CEO's leadership entire time since it was setup in 1545 or so. Attorney O'Connor was General Counsel who was responsible for Fund's legal matter only before he quit the job to be a Senator.

This Fund has been a British Fund's Child Fund since it setup.

The British investments have been respected as lawfully owned British investments after America announced its independence from Britain.

----Oct. 25th, 2017


Heard this morning's money "illegally entrusted abroad".
My response: The Fund caused O'Connors families confusion was set up by my grandfather's entrust entrusted 600-800 years ago.

That was either Chinese Yuan Dynasty time or Chinese Ming dynasty time. There is no such historical records of such "forbidden entrusting abroad" documents is possibly the reason you heard "You (heard it referred a Ming dynasty's Emperors'(Zu's family) possible offspring) just lie like this".

This "lie like this" has been my complain regarding this administration of People's Republic of China.  They state lies about me in a matter of fact tone as if nobody would ever check any evidences or facts, or as if there is no such evidences or facts at all. It is as if whatever they like to say should be the statement and that should be it. What is their problem?

By the way, this offspring is the person that, by rumor, whose great-great-great grandfather was denounced by the family inheritance rule. The rumor is: The father of his great-great-great grandfather changed family inheritance rule from first born son to first born when there were two daughters and one son (youngest). The son did not get family wealth inheritance the same like the heir title.


----Oct. 25th, 2017

Heard arguments this morning about why I can be a 3-Stars General in U.S. Military without years.
My response: I was recruited a 3-Stars General Strategist because of my understanding of WWII.

I know this is how researchers or technology personnel recruited into U.S. Military.

Heard Strategist is a combat officer position, I assume that is maybe the reason I was impressively having commanding power in 2004's meeting, other than I was identified by psychologists ( since teenage time) that I have the nature of a leader in my personality.

----Oct. 25th, 2017


Heard the strange competition from China about who I am.
My response: That is ridiculous has been my complain all these time.

I have been shitted by Chinese government officials wives because they are the real winner wives whose husband includes those I never even met or heard of. And this jealousy expressions is hatred intensive across half of the earth to United States while their husbands are right next to them in Beijing,China entire time in the past 20 years. * I left China in 1996, which is 21 years ago.

Heard in China, the jealousy toward People's Republic of China's Chairman Mao (Zedong Mao) and his first wife Yang (Kaihui Yang) has been phenomenal in the past 10 years. Chairman Mao passed away in 1976, his first wife Yang died in 1930.

This hatred jealous against me is over half of the planet earth geographically, the enormous jealous against Chairman Mao and his first wife Yang is over almost a century time-space-ly. Is there anyone can get what this is?

I am a individual person who only have securities but not military. Why I am the target of Chinese Military as if I am the United States? And according to the rumors I heard, this "war" is targeted against me not the United States. This is the reason why "murder for money attempt" was mentioned.

The Fund that caused O'Connors families confusion, you must have heard how Chinese government insist on to have a saying of who owns it? That Fund was setup about 400 years ago in America, which was 200 years before United States was established (in 1774) and over 300 years before People's Republic of China was established (in 1949). It was another 200-400 years in earliness of time when money left China. Why People's Republic of China's government just insist on having some sayings over this Fund's ownership?

I am a U.S. citizen, O'Connors are all U.S. citizens and the Fund is an American Fund, why People's Republic of China's government has to be the voice in ownership? According People's Republic of China's Inheritance Laws and People's Republic of China's entrusting Laws, the understanding should be the same as United States that the Fund is my lawfully owned fully.

I just do not get what is wrong with this administration of People's Republic of China's?

----Oct. 25th, 2017


听说了今天早上的争议是有关对美国的贡献。
我的回应：我是美国公民，我不是美利坚合众国这个国家。

造成O'Connor家困扰的基金是我的钱财就是因为这个基金是我爷爷为我设立的信托创建的，我是按我爷爷的遗嘱合法继承了我爷爷的信托。

O'Connor家对美国的贡献应该由美利坚合众国这个伟大国家来认可，是美国这个伟大的法治国家在保护着我作为美国公民的合法私有财产。

所有这些贡献奖励应该是向美国的国会，白宫，联邦财政部及美国的联邦储备银行提出。把做贡献者对国家贡献的伟大成就与个人法律拥有的私有财富相提并论是在贬低对国家做出贡献者的国家伟大性。

O'Connor家对我所继承的基金（也就是他们因为一封爷爷的信而很困扰的那个基金）的贡献，历史上就已经被该基金很恰当的予以认可， 这份认可就是通过对于每笔他们帮助实现的交易当时立即付清相关的销售提成，以及在他们父子两代一共只做了55-65年的公司法律总顾问后“同意供给”了六代O'Connor后裔每年2亿美金的给付。

进一步把基金的全部或者一部分在用来奖励O‘Connor家对基金的贡献是非常不恰当的。这个不恰当是造成广播上就此提到贪腐，洗钱，和犯罪活动的原因。我本人也因听到了一些类似的传言而已经报警处理了。

----2017年10月25日。


**听说了有关1775年宣布独立的说法。
我的回应：这个基金在1774-1776年期间有400-500职员，从基金成立开始，这个基金就一直是在CEO的领导之下。O'Connor律师辞职去做参议员之前是这个基金的法律总顾问，只负责基金的法律事务。

这个基金从成立开始就一直是一个英国基金的美国子基金。

美国宣布从英国独立之后，英国在美国殖民时期的投资一直也是英国在美利坚合众国的合法投资。

----2017年10月25日。


听说了今天早上提到“非法信托海外”
我的回应：引起O'Connor家争议的这个基金是用我爷爷600-800年前信托的钱所设立的。

当时是中国的元朝或者是明朝。根本就没有任何所谓的“禁止信托海外"历史文献记录可能是你听到广播里说”你就这么撒谎啊”的原因。（*听说：这个“你”指的是明朝皇帝（朱家）的可能后裔）。

这种“你就这么撒谎啊”一直是我对这届中华人民共和国政府的投诉。他们用“那种事情就是这个样子的”口气说起有关我的假话，也就是睁着眼睛说瞎话，就好像没人会查核事实或者物证，或者就是根本就没有任何事实物证似的。他们想怎么说就可以怎么说，还指望事情应该也就会是这么样。他们到底是什么毛病啊？

顺便提一句，有传言说这个后裔的曽曾曽祖父是根据朱家家族继承规则没有了继承权的一个。传言是：这个曽曾曽祖父的父亲在有两个女儿和一个儿子（最小）的情况下，把家里的长子继承规则改成了头胎继承。这个儿子没有继承人的头衔也没拿到家里的财产。

----2017年10月25日。

听说了今天早上提到我根本没有年资怎么就有了三颗星当上了将军？
我的回应：我是被招募为三颗星的将军策略家是因为我对第二次世界大战的理解。

我知道美军中的研究人员和科技人员也是这么招募的。

听说策略家是属于战斗部队的官职，我估计那是2004年会议时我被认为有让人印象深刻的指挥权的原因，还有就是我本人在十几岁就已经被心理学家鉴定为有领导者的性格。

----2017年10月25日。

听说了来自中国的对于我是谁的那份竞争。
我的回应：我就一直说这简直是莫名其妙。

我是被中国领导人的家属谩骂就是因为她们自己才是胜利的做了妻子的，而她们的丈夫有些是我从未遇见，甚至从未听说过的。在过去的二十年里，她们的丈夫就一直在北京她们自己的身边，而她们这份嫉妒表达那真是仇恨满腔还飞了半个地球到美国来宣泄。*我是1996年离开中国，那可是21年前。

我听说在中国，过去十年里，对于毛泽东主席和他的第一个妻子杨开慧的嫉妒都已经是沸沸扬扬铺天盖地了。毛泽东可是1976年就去世了，杨开慧是1930年去世的。

这种针对我的仇恨满腔的嫉妒是在地理位置上横跨了半个地球，对毛泽东杨开慧的嫉妒是飞跃了将近一个世纪的时空。有没有人弄的明白这是怎么回事？

我是一个人，一个个体，就只有保安人员并不拥有没有军队。怎么我就像是美利坚合众国似的成了中国军方的标靶？而按照我听到的传言，这场“战争”是冲着我来的而不是美利坚合众国。这就是为什么提到了“企图谋财害命”的说法。

那个O'Connor家里吵个不停的基金，你一定听到了中国政府就是坚持由中国政府来给个说法谁才是主人？那个基金是400年前美国还是英国的殖民地时期就设立了，那是在有美利坚合众国（1774年）之前的两百年，在中国人民共和国成立（1949年）之前的三百年。设立这个基金的钱离开中国的时间还要再早上个200-400年。为什么中华人民共和国政府就是坚持一定要由中国政府来说谁才是基金的拥有者？

我是美国公民，O'Connor一家也都是美国公民，这个基金是美国注册的基金，怎么中华人民共和国就成了这个基金拥有权的喉舌了？就是按照中国人民共和国自己的继承法和中华人民共和国自己的信托法，都应该会有和美国一样的理解，也就是这个基金是我方敏合法全部拥有的。

我就是弄不明白这一届的中华人民共和国政府究竟怎么回事啊？

----2017年10月25日。