10-31-2017 The Shocking Performance sound like a Revenge Story （令人震惊的演出故事听着像是为了报复）
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "shocking performance" story.
My response: I add what I heard that related to this specific story.
Heard it was a Chinese Navy Stage Show Performing Group.
Heard all those order to performed had been one man's ex-girlfriend briefly.
Heard that man had already a seriously involved girl-friend for 6 years at the performing time.
Heard it was ordered by the serious girl-friend's relative.
Do you think this sounds familiar? Because after this shocking performance, all those ordered-to-perform actress are “expected" no longer a suitor to anyone that is decent good. Either those participating males or no-one.
The difference is this time they ordered married males to participate this disgusting throw a penis performance. Who are the ordering party, why these married males answered this disgusting order to throw a penis like in a military order's name? One is a British Military Personnel, one is a retired U.S. Military Personnel, and who else? Are they being ordered?
I did send an email to Law Enforcement about this familiarity.
----Oct. 31st, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播里播出的令人震惊的故事。
我的回应：我加上我所听到的和这个特定故事有关的其他信息。
听说是中国人民解放军海军的一个话剧表演团队。
听说这些被命令参与如此表演的都曾经是同一个男人的短暂交往过的女友。
听说那个那个男人在表演当时已有了一个已认真交往6年的女友。
听说那个下命令如此表演的是这个认真交往女友的一个亲戚。
你听着是不是觉得有点好像有点耳熟？因为在这么一次令人震惊的表演之后，所有这些被命令参与演出的女演员就“应该是”没有可能再和任何一个体面好男人谈婚论嫁了。除了被命令配合演出的那些男性，就得单身一人。
区别就是这次参与“演出”的男性都是已婚男人。谁是下命令的那一个？为什么这些已婚男人会听从这么下三滥的一个扔一条男人睾具的恶心命令，还以军令名义？一个是英国在役军人，一个是美国退休军官，还有谁？他们只是接受命令参与嘛？
我是已经向执法机关提供有关如此”耳熟”的信息。
----2017年10月31日。
Tuesday, October 31, 2017
Monday, October 30, 2017
10-30-2017 Is Agreed-upon-Providing Fair? And How BioGate made you rich while Idle sitting in Janus Associates?
10-30-2017 Is Agreed-upon-Providing Fair? And How BioGate made you rich while Idle sitting in Janus Associates?
Heard saying I confused everyone if I own a Fund in this morning's broadcasting.
Heard saying I confused everyone if I own a Fund in this morning's broadcasting.
My response: I was just trying not to claim every French Fund that is 500 years old.
The one that is my inheritance Fund also has a grandfather's letter story.
----Oct. 30th, 2017
Heard saying about "Agreed-upon-Providing" is so unfair to everyone who had worked for the Funds as staff historically.
My response: Being the beneficiary, I appreciate everyone's contribution to every single one of my inheritance Funds.
The agreed-upon-providing was reached when Mr. This or Mr. That was asked to run for a no-pay public post. Being these foreigners' entrusts beneficiary, I do think it was great decision to contribute this way to the countries this fund had been investing by supporting those great Misters to serve the countries, and it has been very decent scale of financial providing considering those Misters do have families to support. Currently, for example, there is about 150-200 house holds of O'Connors for agreed-upon total of $200 Millions yearly providing, this has been the similar scale historically for every agree-upon-providing.
Currently this agree-upon-providing are in process of stopping since those public posts are paid jobs now, and the financial impacts of this stopping is the major reason of those anxieties publicly expressed by some. To be honest, I am on the verge to say I can't take it anymore.
----Oct. 30th, 2017
Heard about how could it possible that I have made a lot of money from BioGate while BioGate is still sitting in Janus Associates?
My response: I heard this rumor for sometime already. I explain here what I heard about it.
Janus Associates has been a great grand child level investment of one of my inheritance Fund was the reason I, rumored, got the job into Janus Associates much easier. I also heard Janus Associates has been entirely owned by Fisher family when I was an employee there. So I do not know anything beyond what I heard.
I am the first person that achieved BioGate's Login Replacement technology as well as first person achieved CDSA working version related technology were the reasons that I earned much bigger intellectual patent fees or similar than Bryan Cockrell who, by rumor, is not the first person achieved BioAPI working version related technology. The hugely contributed on my share in BioGate deal.
BioGate's Login replacement component was not what was broadcasted. The broadcasted was its CDSA Secure Data Transport component.
(Retrieved on Oct. 30th, 2017 from https://www.techopedia.com/definition/10244/common-data-security-architecture-cdsa )
----Oct. 30th, 2017
The one that is my inheritance Fund also has a grandfather's letter story.
----Oct. 30th, 2017
Heard saying about "Agreed-upon-Providing" is so unfair to everyone who had worked for the Funds as staff historically.
My response: Being the beneficiary, I appreciate everyone's contribution to every single one of my inheritance Funds.
The agreed-upon-providing was reached when Mr. This or Mr. That was asked to run for a no-pay public post. Being these foreigners' entrusts beneficiary, I do think it was great decision to contribute this way to the countries this fund had been investing by supporting those great Misters to serve the countries, and it has been very decent scale of financial providing considering those Misters do have families to support. Currently, for example, there is about 150-200 house holds of O'Connors for agreed-upon total of $200 Millions yearly providing, this has been the similar scale historically for every agree-upon-providing.
Currently this agree-upon-providing are in process of stopping since those public posts are paid jobs now, and the financial impacts of this stopping is the major reason of those anxieties publicly expressed by some. To be honest, I am on the verge to say I can't take it anymore.
----Oct. 30th, 2017
Heard about how could it possible that I have made a lot of money from BioGate while BioGate is still sitting in Janus Associates?
My response: I heard this rumor for sometime already. I explain here what I heard about it.
Janus Associates has been a great grand child level investment of one of my inheritance Fund was the reason I, rumored, got the job into Janus Associates much easier. I also heard Janus Associates has been entirely owned by Fisher family when I was an employee there. So I do not know anything beyond what I heard.
I am the first person that achieved BioGate's Login Replacement technology as well as first person achieved CDSA working version related technology were the reasons that I earned much bigger intellectual patent fees or similar than Bryan Cockrell who, by rumor, is not the first person achieved BioAPI working version related technology. The hugely contributed on my share in BioGate deal.
BioGate's Login replacement component was not what was broadcasted. The broadcasted was its CDSA Secure Data Transport component.
Definition - What does Common Data Security Architecture (CDSA) mean?
Common data security architecture (CDSA) is a set of security services and frameworks that allow the creation of a secure infrastructure for client/server applications and services. It is a secure application development framework that equips applications with security capabilities for delivering secure Web and e-commerce applications.
Techopedia explains Common Data Security Architecture (CDSA)
CDSA is primarily a middleware framework that provides a set of APIs for creating and delivering secure applications. It allows application developers to easily add a set of different security features and services that have been prewritten and designed for client/server-based applications. CDSA provides the following features:
- Cryptography and encryption
- Certificate creation and management
- Policy management
- Authentication and non-repudiation
- Public key infrastructure
It was initially designed by Intel Architecture Labs for Linux but now also supports the Windows platform.
----Oct. 30th, 2017
Sunday, October 29, 2017
10-29-2017 My Contribution to China's Subway System is Authentically Mine, Radio Program Producers are not eligible to Authenticate it "fake or plagiary"
10-29-2017 My Contribution to China's Subway System is Authentically Mine, Radio Program Producers are not eligible to Authenticate it "fake or plagiary".（我对中国地铁的贡献真实，广播剧制作组不够资格作为权威来认证“虚假剽窃”）
Heard the confusion if my contribution to China can be authentic since I am not from the professional background。（中文附后）
My response: I would use my contribution to China's mega cities' subway system to explain this. My professional background is never city architecture, and my hobby is never architecture design.
I have been Boston, MA resident since 2004 and I had briefly lived in Boston, MA for two month in 2003. My contribution to China's Subway system you heard on the radio, if you can hear the replay while you take a look at Boston's and New York City's subway map that displayed in every subway station, you know that every single word I said is authentically my original as a technology researcher background with no architecture education. That is how I contributed to China's mega cities' subway system.
The similar is my "Classic Suzhou Garden on a Roof Top." The CDSA, computer software framework that framed every single component of a software for security purpose that I had worked out from BioGate project, contributed to that exterior design to integrated the entire garden idea. If you can hear the replay how I expressed my vision of this garden, you know that every single word is authentically my own originals even I am not the person can draw a blue print. (*And I do have a grandfather college graduated from Architecture major).
Every one of my contribution or achievements is similar this, touch the point professionally to contribute but not from professional background knowledge.
The confusion may from the difference "Authentication(真实性，证明,鉴定）" that derived from "Authentic（真实)" and "Authenticate(认证）". The radio program producers suppose to report its authentication to see if it is authentic, radio program producers are not eligible to be the authority to authenticate its authentication to make it "no longer authentic" but “fake or plagiary（虚假或剽窃）” only .
Is it implying that without radio program producing team's authentication, my contribution is not mine any more? Who are these producers so authority on any matter? How they can have this authority by their direct(females) or indirect (males) sexual experiences with prominent males? Is that because a subway is a "operational tunnel system" as well?
Boston T-map (Subway Map)
New York City's Subway Map
----Oct. 29th, 2017
Heard the confusion of what is "Entrust" and what is "inheritance."
My response: I would use an example here to explain how I inherited my grandfathers' entrusts according to my grandfathers' wills.
If you have a child about 10 years old now, and you got a fortune like win a Lotto, after you put aside what you want your child to have and what your own planned saving or investment, if you also want to put aside something for your child's child(ren), Entrust is what you need to do.
You can go to an attorney and tell the attorney how much you want your child' child to have, and you can specify exact which child from your child is the one you want to give how much this money if not intend to let all of you child's children to have this money evenly. You need to write down all these in details and that would be your will. Your will would be in this attorney's safe keeping as part of entrusting legal documentations.
After you child grow up and have child or children, the child fits your will to have that money will inherit that money from you, not your child but you. That money you entrusted would be called this child's inheritance from you.
----Oct. 29th, 2017
Heard Chinese Premiere's wife is the real authentic heir from Zu's family.
My response: I say unlikely.
According to the rumor I hear, the saying is she got a dragon tattoo hidden on her buttock's split. And Zu's family only acknowledge this dragon tattoo to be the authentic heir.
I am not doubting if it is appropriate for a father to order a heir's tattoo at a hidden place like such, I only doubt why the father would want everyone to look at his heir daughter's butts whenever the heir's authentication is in need of verification.
---Oct. 29th, 2017
听说了因为我的专业背景而怀疑我对中国的贡献是否真实。
我的回应：我会以我对中国地铁建设的贡献作为例子来解释。我的专业背景从来不是城建规划，也不是建筑设计。
我从2004年起就一直住在麻州波士顿，2003年是短暂住了2个月左右。如果你能看一下纽约和波士顿两地每一个地铁站都有张贴的地铁线路示意图，同时听广播剧就我对中国地铁建设所做贡献的报道，你就会知道每一字每一句都是我作为一个科技研发人员但非城建专业背景的真实原创。我就是这么对中国超大城市的地铁建设作出了贡献的。
这和我的”屋顶上的苏州园林"创意很类似。电脑软件的保安框架CDSA，就是我做Bio Gate软件时包裹了电脑软件的每一个部件的那个骨架结构，就是这个"屋顶苏州园林”里通过外墙设计来达到整个园林设计一体化的创意来源。如果你能听到当时这集的重播，你就会知道虽然我不是学建筑设计的更不会画设计蓝图，但每一字每一句都是我真实原创。（*我确实是有一个从建筑专业本科毕业了的爷爷）
我的每一个贡献或者成就都和此相似，每一个都是很专业的在关键点上作出了贡献，但确实都不是出于专业背景知识。
这个困扰可能来自英语名词Authentication(真实性，证明,鉴定），这个英语单词有两个引申意思。一个是从"Authentic（真实)"引申来的，一个是从"Authenticate(认证）"引申来的。广播剧制作组应该是报道Authentication(真实性）来查核是否真实（Authentic）, 广播剧的制作组不是什么权威机构可以进行通过认证（Authenticate）这些贡献的真实性（Authentication）而让这些贡献不再真实而变成了“虚假剽窃”。
这是不是在暗示只要播剧制作组不给予认可认证，我对中国的贡献就什么都不是了？这些广播剧制作组的都是些什么人物啊，对任何事物怎么都是如此权威？他们是如何能通过和一些有名男人的或直接（女）或间接（男）的性交活动来实现如此的权威性？就因为地铁也是“隧道运作系统”啊？
Boston T-map (Subway Map)
New York City's Subway Map
----2017年10月29日。
听说了什么是“信托”及什么是“所继承的财产”的困扰。
我的回应：我会用一个例子来说明我是如何按照我爷爷的遗嘱来继承我自己爷爷的信托。
如果你有个孩子只有十岁左右，你发了一笔财，比如中了奖卷，你把想给你孩子的钱放在了一边，又把自己想存的钱或想投资的钱也放在了一遍，这是你还想替你这个孩子今后会生的一个或几个小孩再放一笔钱，你需要办理的就是“信托”。
你可以找一个律师，告诉这个律师你希望给你小孩今后回生的孩子多少钱，如果不是计划让你孩子今后所有会生下来的孩子平分这笔钱的话，你还可以具体说明是哪一个孩子你想给这笔钱。你需要写下你所想说明的细节，这也就是你的”信托意愿”或者“遗嘱“了。你的这个“信托意愿”或者“遗嘱”会由这个律师作为信托的法律文件的一部分予以保存。
等到你的孩子长大，生了小孩以后，符合你“信托意愿”或者“遗嘱”上所要求的条件的你的小孩的小孩就会从你这里（而不是从你孩子）继承这笔钱，你所“信托”的这笔钱就是你孩子的孩子从你这里“所继承的财产”。
----2017年10月29日。
听说了中国总理的老婆才是明朝朱家的真正继承人。
我的回应；我会说不大可能吧。
按照我所听到的传言，说法是：那女的屁股的股沟里有个龙形纹身。而朱家是只认这个龙形纹身是朱家真正的继承人。
我不是在怀疑做父亲的会下令让继承人龙形纹身给藏在这么个隐秘的地方，我就只是怀疑做父亲的会让每一个需要验证朱家继承人龙形纹身的人都去查看一下他自己继承人女儿的屁股。
----2017年10月29日。
Heard the confusion if my contribution to China can be authentic since I am not from the professional background。（中文附后）
My response: I would use my contribution to China's mega cities' subway system to explain this. My professional background is never city architecture, and my hobby is never architecture design.
I have been Boston, MA resident since 2004 and I had briefly lived in Boston, MA for two month in 2003. My contribution to China's Subway system you heard on the radio, if you can hear the replay while you take a look at Boston's and New York City's subway map that displayed in every subway station, you know that every single word I said is authentically my original as a technology researcher background with no architecture education. That is how I contributed to China's mega cities' subway system.
The similar is my "Classic Suzhou Garden on a Roof Top." The CDSA, computer software framework that framed every single component of a software for security purpose that I had worked out from BioGate project, contributed to that exterior design to integrated the entire garden idea. If you can hear the replay how I expressed my vision of this garden, you know that every single word is authentically my own originals even I am not the person can draw a blue print. (*And I do have a grandfather college graduated from Architecture major).
Every one of my contribution or achievements is similar this, touch the point professionally to contribute but not from professional background knowledge.
The confusion may from the difference "Authentication(真实性，证明,鉴定）" that derived from "Authentic（真实)" and "Authenticate(认证）". The radio program producers suppose to report its authentication to see if it is authentic, radio program producers are not eligible to be the authority to authenticate its authentication to make it "no longer authentic" but “fake or plagiary（虚假或剽窃）” only .
Is it implying that without radio program producing team's authentication, my contribution is not mine any more? Who are these producers so authority on any matter? How they can have this authority by their direct(females) or indirect (males) sexual experiences with prominent males? Is that because a subway is a "operational tunnel system" as well?
Boston T-map (Subway Map)
New York City's Subway Map
----Oct. 29th, 2017
Heard the confusion of what is "Entrust" and what is "inheritance."
My response: I would use an example here to explain how I inherited my grandfathers' entrusts according to my grandfathers' wills.
If you have a child about 10 years old now, and you got a fortune like win a Lotto, after you put aside what you want your child to have and what your own planned saving or investment, if you also want to put aside something for your child's child(ren), Entrust is what you need to do.
You can go to an attorney and tell the attorney how much you want your child' child to have, and you can specify exact which child from your child is the one you want to give how much this money if not intend to let all of you child's children to have this money evenly. You need to write down all these in details and that would be your will. Your will would be in this attorney's safe keeping as part of entrusting legal documentations.
After you child grow up and have child or children, the child fits your will to have that money will inherit that money from you, not your child but you. That money you entrusted would be called this child's inheritance from you.
----Oct. 29th, 2017
Heard Chinese Premiere's wife is the real authentic heir from Zu's family.
My response: I say unlikely.
According to the rumor I hear, the saying is she got a dragon tattoo hidden on her buttock's split. And Zu's family only acknowledge this dragon tattoo to be the authentic heir.
I am not doubting if it is appropriate for a father to order a heir's tattoo at a hidden place like such, I only doubt why the father would want everyone to look at his heir daughter's butts whenever the heir's authentication is in need of verification.
---Oct. 29th, 2017
听说了因为我的专业背景而怀疑我对中国的贡献是否真实。
我的回应：我会以我对中国地铁建设的贡献作为例子来解释。我的专业背景从来不是城建规划，也不是建筑设计。
我从2004年起就一直住在麻州波士顿，2003年是短暂住了2个月左右。如果你能看一下纽约和波士顿两地每一个地铁站都有张贴的地铁线路示意图，同时听广播剧就我对中国地铁建设所做贡献的报道，你就会知道每一字每一句都是我作为一个科技研发人员但非城建专业背景的真实原创。我就是这么对中国超大城市的地铁建设作出了贡献的。
这和我的”屋顶上的苏州园林"创意很类似。电脑软件的保安框架CDSA，就是我做Bio Gate软件时包裹了电脑软件的每一个部件的那个骨架结构，就是这个"屋顶苏州园林”里通过外墙设计来达到整个园林设计一体化的创意来源。如果你能听到当时这集的重播，你就会知道虽然我不是学建筑设计的更不会画设计蓝图，但每一字每一句都是我真实原创。（*我确实是有一个从建筑专业本科毕业了的爷爷）
我的每一个贡献或者成就都和此相似，每一个都是很专业的在关键点上作出了贡献，但确实都不是出于专业背景知识。
这个困扰可能来自英语名词Authentication(真实性，证明,鉴定），这个英语单词有两个引申意思。一个是从"Authentic（真实)"引申来的，一个是从"Authenticate(认证）"引申来的。广播剧制作组应该是报道Authentication(真实性）来查核是否真实（Authentic）, 广播剧的制作组不是什么权威机构可以进行通过认证（Authenticate）这些贡献的真实性（Authentication）而让这些贡献不再真实而变成了“虚假剽窃”。
这是不是在暗示只要播剧制作组不给予认可认证，我对中国的贡献就什么都不是了？这些广播剧制作组的都是些什么人物啊，对任何事物怎么都是如此权威？他们是如何能通过和一些有名男人的或直接（女）或间接（男）的性交活动来实现如此的权威性？就因为地铁也是“隧道运作系统”啊？
Boston T-map (Subway Map)
New York City's Subway Map
----2017年10月29日。
听说了什么是“信托”及什么是“所继承的财产”的困扰。
我的回应：我会用一个例子来说明我是如何按照我爷爷的遗嘱来继承我自己爷爷的信托。
如果你有个孩子只有十岁左右，你发了一笔财，比如中了奖卷，你把想给你孩子的钱放在了一边，又把自己想存的钱或想投资的钱也放在了一遍，这是你还想替你这个孩子今后会生的一个或几个小孩再放一笔钱，你需要办理的就是“信托”。
你可以找一个律师，告诉这个律师你希望给你小孩今后回生的孩子多少钱，如果不是计划让你孩子今后所有会生下来的孩子平分这笔钱的话，你还可以具体说明是哪一个孩子你想给这笔钱。你需要写下你所想说明的细节，这也就是你的”信托意愿”或者“遗嘱“了。你的这个“信托意愿”或者“遗嘱”会由这个律师作为信托的法律文件的一部分予以保存。
等到你的孩子长大，生了小孩以后，符合你“信托意愿”或者“遗嘱”上所要求的条件的你的小孩的小孩就会从你这里（而不是从你孩子）继承这笔钱，你所“信托”的这笔钱就是你孩子的孩子从你这里“所继承的财产”。
----2017年10月29日。
听说了中国总理的老婆才是明朝朱家的真正继承人。
我的回应；我会说不大可能吧。
按照我所听到的传言，说法是：那女的屁股的股沟里有个龙形纹身。而朱家是只认这个龙形纹身是朱家真正的继承人。
我不是在怀疑做父亲的会下令让继承人龙形纹身给藏在这么个隐秘的地方，我就只是怀疑做父亲的会让每一个需要验证朱家继承人龙形纹身的人都去查看一下他自己继承人女儿的屁股。
----2017年10月29日。
Saturday, October 28, 2017
10-28-2017 Ningbo Fang's House and China's College Education(宁波方家和中国的高等教育）
10-28-2017 Ningbo Fang's House and China's College Education(宁波方家和中国的高等教育）
Heard this morning's a female CEO has not been dragged out.
My response: She is the CEO of the Chicago Foundation invested by the Fund that caused some O'Connors confusion, or invested by another of my inheritance Fund. Too bad, she is not the Fund's CEO being dragged out in that Fund's story，heard she is the CEO of a Chicago Foundation that has been supported by that Fund's.
This is how this radio program produced 2015-2016's radio program. This is the same producing team's effort.
That is the reason I have this serious confusion how many Funds O'Connors are so confused of now. Tina O'Connor (Or Helena O'Connor) has a father who once represented three of my grandfathers entrusts, two of them have Foundations in Chicago.
* The confusion comes from the Chinese translation of Fund and Foundation.
----Oct. 28th, 2017
Heard this morning's argument about Ningbo Fang's House".（中文附后）
My response: Ningbo Fang's House was confirmed, by Taiwan government on the radio, lead by Zhiren Fang, his grandfather and father, and Wenhai Fang is the heir son of Zhiren Fang, and this generation is head by the daughter from Wenhai Fang.
I am the only daughter of my lawfully married birth parents Wenhai Fang and Boxian Wang. I am the one and only granddaughter of Zhiren Fang.
The conclusion: I, Min Fang, is the Head Missy of Ningbo Fang's House that proudly support China's College Education.
I am the Missy Fang Ingonyama as well. I inherited Ingonyama title from my birth grandfather Mufasa (唐穆宗）
----Oct. 28th, 2017
Heard the confusion how exactly Ningbo Fang's house supported China' College Education.
My response: Through donation to Central government of Republic of China in early 1900 time or so to fund its Central College Education system, as confirmed you heard on the radio by Taiwan government.
----Oct. 28th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about my complain of "reality shows faking efforts."
My response: It was said this was the strategy of World War II. And, I heard some are very proud they can do this to make real me a fake through and through.
My complain is they have no intention to stop at presentation only.
My complains are that they have taken my money and actually spent it, and they abused me without intention to stop, and they did tear pages from my inheritance Fund's accounting books to claim the fund's ownership.
I did call law enforcement's help regarding all these.
----Oct. 28th, 2017
Heard my screams Chinese government have been shared by a lot.
My response: I, Min Fang, am the one and only lawful owner of all my inheritance funds that I inherited on June 30th of 2004 according to my birth grandfathers wills, this is no confusion at all.
Those Funds I inherited on June 30th of 2004 had all been entrusts and currently is entrusted by myself.
Some big names that have represented my inheritance Funds have not worked for myself or those who share some birth grandfathers with me. Those entrust funds have never been old style family operating business.
I have no intention to merge my inheritance funds, and I have no intention to take on the responsibility of operating anyone of them myself. I have no intention to make any of my inheritance funds a family operating business.
----Oct. 28th, 2017.
听说了今天早上提到一个女的CEO根本就没给拖出去。
我的回应：她是芝加哥一个慈善文化基金会的一个CEO，这个慈善文化基金会是由我所继承的金融基金所投资的，就是那个O‘Connor家吵个不停的那个。很不辛，她不是给拖出去的那一个金融基金的经理，听说她是那个金融基金所支持的一家慈善文化基金会的CEO。
2015-2016年期间的广播剧就是如此制作的。
这也是我真是很好奇O’Connor家究竟对多少家金融基金很困扰啊？Tina O'Connor的父亲曾经是我三个爷爷三个信托的代理律师。其中有两个在芝加哥有这种慈善文化基金会。
*华人疑问可能来自英文Foundation和Fund的区别。
Foundation：接受捐款或拨款支持，参与文化或慈善活动的公司组织.
Fund：是金融投资，资金运作来投资做生意的公司。
----2017年10月28日。
听说了今天早上有关宁波方家的争执
我的回应：被台湾政府在广播上证实：宁波方家是方智仁的爷爷，父亲及方智仁这一支的。被台湾政府证实的宁波方家的大少爷方智仁的儿子方文海是宁波方家的继承人，而这一代的宁波方家当家的是个小姐。
我是我亲生父母方文海和王博贤的婚生女儿，也是他们唯一的女儿。我是我爷爷方智仁唯一的孙女儿。
结论：我方敏是当年出资支持了中国大学教育的宁波方家的当家大小姐。
我还有个称号就是狮子王方家大小姐，这个狮子王的称号是从我的亲生爷爷Mufasa（唐穆宗）那儿继承的。
----2017年10月28日。
听说了究竟宁波方家是如何支持中国大学教育的疑问。
我的回应：通过在1900年代早期捐款给中华民国的中央政府支持其兴办了中华民国时期的中央大学教育系统, 就像你在广播上听到的被台湾政府所证实的。
----2017年10月28日。
听说了今天早上的广播提到了我所抱怨的“用真实剧来造假”。
我的回应：据说这是第二次世界大战时期所用的计谋。我也听说有些人很骄傲他们能把真人就这么给作成“假的”。
我的投诉就是他们根本就没打算展示一下这个计谋就停。
我的投诉有：他们是真的把我的钱拿走花掉，他们是真的凌虐我还坚决不肯也不打算停下来，他们是真的把我所继承基金的账本部分账页给撕毁了来宣称该基金的拥有权。
我确实有就所有这些投诉而报警处理。
----2017年10月28日。
听说不少人都有类似我对中国政府“怎么什么都要指手画脚”的意见。
我的回应：我在2004年6月30日按我亲生爷爷们的遗嘱所继承的所有基金，我方敏都是唯一的合法拥有者，这一点是没有任何混淆不清的。
我于2004年6月30日所继承的那些基金2004年前一直都是信托，目前也都是按我要求在信托当中。
有些代理我的那些基金的响亮名字们从未不是在替我方敏这个个人工作，也从未替我爷爷们的其他孩子们工作过。那些信托基金也从来不是什么老式的家庭式企业。
我没有任何合并我所继承的任何基金的计划，我也不打算自己经营任何一家我所继承的基金。我不会把我继承的任何基金变成老式的家庭式企业。
----2017年10月28日。
Heard this morning's a female CEO has not been dragged out.
My response: She is the CEO of the Chicago Foundation invested by the Fund that caused some O'Connors confusion, or invested by another of my inheritance Fund. Too bad, she is not the Fund's CEO being dragged out in that Fund's story，heard she is the CEO of a Chicago Foundation that has been supported by that Fund's.
This is how this radio program produced 2015-2016's radio program. This is the same producing team's effort.
That is the reason I have this serious confusion how many Funds O'Connors are so confused of now. Tina O'Connor (Or Helena O'Connor) has a father who once represented three of my grandfathers entrusts, two of them have Foundations in Chicago.
* The confusion comes from the Chinese translation of Fund and Foundation.
----Oct. 28th, 2017
Heard this morning's argument about Ningbo Fang's House".（中文附后）
My response: Ningbo Fang's House was confirmed, by Taiwan government on the radio, lead by Zhiren Fang, his grandfather and father, and Wenhai Fang is the heir son of Zhiren Fang, and this generation is head by the daughter from Wenhai Fang.
I am the only daughter of my lawfully married birth parents Wenhai Fang and Boxian Wang. I am the one and only granddaughter of Zhiren Fang.
The conclusion: I, Min Fang, is the Head Missy of Ningbo Fang's House that proudly support China's College Education.
I am the Missy Fang Ingonyama as well. I inherited Ingonyama title from my birth grandfather Mufasa (唐穆宗）
----Oct. 28th, 2017
Heard the confusion how exactly Ningbo Fang's house supported China' College Education.
My response: Through donation to Central government of Republic of China in early 1900 time or so to fund its Central College Education system, as confirmed you heard on the radio by Taiwan government.
----Oct. 28th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about my complain of "reality shows faking efforts."
My response: It was said this was the strategy of World War II. And, I heard some are very proud they can do this to make real me a fake through and through.
My complain is they have no intention to stop at presentation only.
My complains are that they have taken my money and actually spent it, and they abused me without intention to stop, and they did tear pages from my inheritance Fund's accounting books to claim the fund's ownership.
I did call law enforcement's help regarding all these.
----Oct. 28th, 2017
Heard my screams Chinese government have been shared by a lot.
My response: I, Min Fang, am the one and only lawful owner of all my inheritance funds that I inherited on June 30th of 2004 according to my birth grandfathers wills, this is no confusion at all.
Those Funds I inherited on June 30th of 2004 had all been entrusts and currently is entrusted by myself.
Some big names that have represented my inheritance Funds have not worked for myself or those who share some birth grandfathers with me. Those entrust funds have never been old style family operating business.
I have no intention to merge my inheritance funds, and I have no intention to take on the responsibility of operating anyone of them myself. I have no intention to make any of my inheritance funds a family operating business.
----Oct. 28th, 2017.
听说了今天早上提到一个女的CEO根本就没给拖出去。
我的回应：她是芝加哥一个慈善文化基金会的一个CEO，这个慈善文化基金会是由我所继承的金融基金所投资的，就是那个O‘Connor家吵个不停的那个。很不辛，她不是给拖出去的那一个金融基金的经理，听说她是那个金融基金所支持的一家慈善文化基金会的CEO。
2015-2016年期间的广播剧就是如此制作的。
这也是我真是很好奇O’Connor家究竟对多少家金融基金很困扰啊？Tina O'Connor的父亲曾经是我三个爷爷三个信托的代理律师。其中有两个在芝加哥有这种慈善文化基金会。
*华人疑问可能来自英文Foundation和Fund的区别。
Foundation：接受捐款或拨款支持，参与文化或慈善活动的公司组织.
Fund：是金融投资，资金运作来投资做生意的公司。
----2017年10月28日。
听说了今天早上有关宁波方家的争执
我的回应：被台湾政府在广播上证实：宁波方家是方智仁的爷爷，父亲及方智仁这一支的。被台湾政府证实的宁波方家的大少爷方智仁的儿子方文海是宁波方家的继承人，而这一代的宁波方家当家的是个小姐。
我是我亲生父母方文海和王博贤的婚生女儿，也是他们唯一的女儿。我是我爷爷方智仁唯一的孙女儿。
结论：我方敏是当年出资支持了中国大学教育的宁波方家的当家大小姐。
我还有个称号就是狮子王方家大小姐，这个狮子王的称号是从我的亲生爷爷Mufasa（唐穆宗）那儿继承的。
----2017年10月28日。
听说了究竟宁波方家是如何支持中国大学教育的疑问。
我的回应：通过在1900年代早期捐款给中华民国的中央政府支持其兴办了中华民国时期的中央大学教育系统, 就像你在广播上听到的被台湾政府所证实的。
----2017年10月28日。
听说了今天早上的广播提到了我所抱怨的“用真实剧来造假”。
我的回应：据说这是第二次世界大战时期所用的计谋。我也听说有些人很骄傲他们能把真人就这么给作成“假的”。
我的投诉就是他们根本就没打算展示一下这个计谋就停。
我的投诉有：他们是真的把我的钱拿走花掉，他们是真的凌虐我还坚决不肯也不打算停下来，他们是真的把我所继承基金的账本部分账页给撕毁了来宣称该基金的拥有权。
我确实有就所有这些投诉而报警处理。
----2017年10月28日。
听说不少人都有类似我对中国政府“怎么什么都要指手画脚”的意见。
我的回应：我在2004年6月30日按我亲生爷爷们的遗嘱所继承的所有基金，我方敏都是唯一的合法拥有者，这一点是没有任何混淆不清的。
我于2004年6月30日所继承的那些基金2004年前一直都是信托，目前也都是按我要求在信托当中。
有些代理我的那些基金的响亮名字们从未不是在替我方敏这个个人工作，也从未替我爷爷们的其他孩子们工作过。那些信托基金也从来不是什么老式的家庭式企业。
我没有任何合并我所继承的任何基金的计划，我也不打算自己经营任何一家我所继承的基金。我不会把我继承的任何基金变成老式的家庭式企业。
----2017年10月28日。
Friday, October 27, 2017
10-27-2017 People's Republic of China's citizens are not Privileged than Citizens from other Countries in front of U.S. Laws（(中华人民共和国的公民在美国法律面前并不比任何其他国家的公民优越）
10-27-2017 People's Republic of China's citizens are not Privileged than Citizens from other Countries in front of U.S. Laws.(中华人民共和国的公民在美国法律面前并不比任何其他国家的公民优越）
Heard this morning's talk of a Chinese male intent to divorce after 10 years marriage.
MY response: That is that person's personal issue.
Being a female, I agree with those females publicly expressed that People's Republic of China's citizens do not have the privilege to expect other nations' any female citizen, especially female citizens from marriage-freedom-countries, to be less privileged in Freedom of Marriage.
I am a U.S. citizen, I refuse to grant People's Republic of China's any citizen any privilege to make me a victim according to U.S. laws as well as People's Republic of China's Laws.
I am a U.S. citizen, I refuse to grant any nations' any citizen (including United States) any privilege to make me a victim according to U.S. laws as well as any nations' own laws, worldwide-ly.
----Oct. 27th, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播躺倒一个中国男人在结婚十年之后要离婚的事。
我的回应：那是那个人的私人生活问题。
作为女性，我同意今天早上那几个女性就此公开表达的观点：中华人民共和国的公民不能以为其他国家的女性公民在婚姻自由上比中国公民要低等，特别是婚姻自由国家的女性公民。
我是美国公民，我拒绝任何中国公民让我成为根据美国法律以及根据中华人民共和国法律的受害者。
我是美国公民，我拒绝世界上任何国家（包括美国）的任何公民让我成为根据美国法律以及根据世界上任何国家当地法律的受害者。
----2017年10月27日。
Heard this morning's talk of a Chinese male intent to divorce after 10 years marriage.
MY response: That is that person's personal issue.
Being a female, I agree with those females publicly expressed that People's Republic of China's citizens do not have the privilege to expect other nations' any female citizen, especially female citizens from marriage-freedom-countries, to be less privileged in Freedom of Marriage.
I am a U.S. citizen, I refuse to grant People's Republic of China's any citizen any privilege to make me a victim according to U.S. laws as well as People's Republic of China's Laws.
I am a U.S. citizen, I refuse to grant any nations' any citizen (including United States) any privilege to make me a victim according to U.S. laws as well as any nations' own laws, worldwide-ly.
----Oct. 27th, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播躺倒一个中国男人在结婚十年之后要离婚的事。
我的回应：那是那个人的私人生活问题。
作为女性，我同意今天早上那几个女性就此公开表达的观点：中华人民共和国的公民不能以为其他国家的女性公民在婚姻自由上比中国公民要低等，特别是婚姻自由国家的女性公民。
我是美国公民，我拒绝任何中国公民让我成为根据美国法律以及根据中华人民共和国法律的受害者。
我是美国公民，我拒绝世界上任何国家（包括美国）的任何公民让我成为根据美国法律以及根据世界上任何国家当地法律的受害者。
----2017年10月27日。
Thursday, October 26, 2017
10-26-2017 This morning's episode's entire producing team was from 2015-2016 era.
10-26-2017 This morning's episode's entire producing team was from 2015-2016 era.
Heard this morning's confusing shocking episode.
My response: The director, rumored a cousin to that Jessica who is the announced mother of David Petraeus' child or children, has participated this radio program's current producing since this week or since last week. He was the person directed 2015- early 2017 era of this radio program's producing.
Heard this morning's episode's entire producing team was this director's original team of 2015 -2016 era.
----Oct. 26th, 2017
Heard this morning's confusing shocking episode.
My response: The director, rumored a cousin to that Jessica who is the announced mother of David Petraeus' child or children, has participated this radio program's current producing since this week or since last week. He was the person directed 2015- early 2017 era of this radio program's producing.
Heard this morning's episode's entire producing team was this director's original team of 2015 -2016 era.
----Oct. 26th, 2017
Wednesday, October 25, 2017
10-25-2017 The Fund that O'Connors argued about is My Private Wealth Lawfully Owned(O'Connor家在争执的这个基金是我合法拥有的私人财产）
10-25-2017 The Fund that O'Connors argued about is My Private Wealth Lawfully Owned(O'Connor家在争执的这个基金是我合法拥有的私人财产）
Heard this morning's argument about contributions to U.S.(中文附后）
My response: I am a U.S.citizen, I am not the United States.
The fund caused O'Connors families' confusion is my money because it was set up by my grandfather's entrust I inherited lawfully according to his will.
O'Connors contribution to the great United States should be recognized by United States, the great lawful country protect my private wealth as a U.S. citizen's lawfully owned.
Any contribution reward recognition should be directed to Congress Hill, White House, Federal Treasure Department and Federal Bank of the United States. It is inappropriate to belittle the contributors contributions' National Greatness to individual citizen's privately owned wealth.
O'Connors contributions to the Fund that I inherited, the one they are confused because of their grandfather's letter, had been recognized by the Fund appropriately and historically, reflected by incentives paid on time for each deal O'Connors helped to reach and $200 Million per year sized agreed-upon-providing provided for six generations after two generations Attorney O'Connors' total 55 or 65 years working time for the funds as General Counselor.
Further reward of entire size or partial size of the Fund regarding O'Connors families contribution to the Fund is inappropriate. This inappropriateness is the reason that caused mention of corruptions, money laundries and criminal activities on the radio. I did call law enforcement's help regarding some similar rumors I heard.
----Oct. 25th, 2017
**Heard the saying of 1775's speech of independence.
My response: The fund's 400-500 staffed between 1774-1776 and it was under a CEO's leadership entire time since it was setup in 1545 or so. Attorney O'Connor was General Counsel who was responsible for Fund's legal matter only before he quit the job to be a Senator.
This Fund has been a British Fund's Child Fund since it setup.
The British investments have been respected as lawfully owned British investments after America announced its independence from Britain.
----Oct. 25th, 2017
Heard this morning's money "illegally entrusted abroad".
My response: The Fund caused O'Connors families confusion was set up by my grandfather's entrust entrusted 600-800 years ago.
That was either Chinese Yuan Dynasty time or Chinese Ming dynasty time. There is no such historical records of such "forbidden entrusting abroad" documents is possibly the reason you heard "You (heard it referred a Ming dynasty's Emperors'(Zu's family) possible offspring) just lie like this".
This "lie like this" has been my complain regarding this administration of People's Republic of China. They state lies about me in a matter of fact tone as if nobody would ever check any evidences or facts, or as if there is no such evidences or facts at all. It is as if whatever they like to say should be the statement and that should be it. What is their problem?
By the way, this offspring is the person that, by rumor, whose great-great-great grandfather was denounced by the family inheritance rule. The rumor is: The father of his great-great-great grandfather changed family inheritance rule from first born son to first born when there were two daughters and one son (youngest). The son did not get family wealth inheritance the same like the heir title.
----Oct. 25th, 2017
Heard arguments this morning about why I can be a 3-Stars General in U.S. Military without years.
My response: I was recruited a 3-Stars General Strategist because of my understanding of WWII.
I know this is how researchers or technology personnel recruited into U.S. Military.
Heard Strategist is a combat officer position, I assume that is maybe the reason I was impressively having commanding power in 2004's meeting, other than I was identified by psychologists ( since teenage time) that I have the nature of a leader in my personality.
----Oct. 25th, 2017
Heard the strange competition from China about who I am.
My response: That is ridiculous has been my complain all these time.
I have been shitted by Chinese government officials wives because they are the real winner wives whose husband includes those I never even met or heard of. And this jealousy expressions is hatred intensive across half of the earth to United States while their husbands are right next to them in Beijing,China entire time in the past 20 years. * I left China in 1996, which is 21 years ago.
Heard in China, the jealousy toward People's Republic of China's Chairman Mao (Zedong Mao) and his first wife Yang (Kaihui Yang) has been phenomenal in the past 10 years. Chairman Mao passed away in 1976, his first wife Yang died in 1930.
This hatred jealous against me is over half of the planet earth geographically, the enormous jealous against Chairman Mao and his first wife Yang is over almost a century time-space-ly. Is there anyone can get what this is?
I am a individual person who only have securities but not military. Why I am the target of Chinese Military as if I am the United States? And according to the rumors I heard, this "war" is targeted against me not the United States. This is the reason why "murder for money attempt" was mentioned.
The Fund that caused O'Connors families confusion, you must have heard how Chinese government insist on to have a saying of who owns it? That Fund was setup about 400 years ago in America, which was 200 years before United States was established (in 1774) and over 300 years before People's Republic of China was established (in 1949). It was another 200-400 years in earliness of time when money left China. Why People's Republic of China's government just insist on having some sayings over this Fund's ownership?
I am a U.S. citizen, O'Connors are all U.S. citizens and the Fund is an American Fund, why People's Republic of China's government has to be the voice in ownership? According People's Republic of China's Inheritance Laws and People's Republic of China's entrusting Laws, the understanding should be the same as United States that the Fund is my lawfully owned fully.
I just do not get what is wrong with this administration of People's Republic of China's?
----Oct. 25th, 2017
听说了今天早上的争议是有关对美国的贡献。
我的回应：我是美国公民，我不是美利坚合众国这个国家。
造成O'Connor家困扰的基金是我的钱财就是因为这个基金是我爷爷为我设立的信托创建的，我是按我爷爷的遗嘱合法继承了我爷爷的信托。
O'Connor家对美国的贡献应该由美利坚合众国这个伟大国家来认可，是美国这个伟大的法治国家在保护着我作为美国公民的合法私有财产。
所有这些贡献奖励应该是向美国的国会，白宫，联邦财政部及美国的联邦储备银行提出。把做贡献者对国家贡献的伟大成就与个人法律拥有的私有财富相提并论是在贬低对国家做出贡献者的国家伟大性。
O'Connor家对我所继承的基金（也就是他们因为一封爷爷的信而很困扰的那个基金）的贡献，历史上就已经被该基金很恰当的予以认可， 这份认可就是通过对于每笔他们帮助实现的交易当时立即付清相关的销售提成，以及在他们父子两代一共只做了55-65年的公司法律总顾问后“同意供给”了六代O'Connor后裔每年2亿美金的给付。
进一步把基金的全部或者一部分在用来奖励O‘Connor家对基金的贡献是非常不恰当的。这个不恰当是造成广播上就此提到贪腐，洗钱，和犯罪活动的原因。我本人也因听到了一些类似的传言而已经报警处理了。
----2017年10月25日。
**听说了有关1775年宣布独立的说法。
我的回应：这个基金在1774-1776年期间有400-500职员，从基金成立开始，这个基金就一直是在CEO的领导之下。O'Connor律师辞职去做参议员之前是这个基金的法律总顾问，只负责基金的法律事务。
这个基金从成立开始就一直是一个英国基金的美国子基金。
美国宣布从英国独立之后，英国在美国殖民时期的投资一直也是英国在美利坚合众国的合法投资。
----2017年10月25日。
听说了今天早上提到“非法信托海外”
我的回应：引起O'Connor家争议的这个基金是用我爷爷600-800年前信托的钱所设立的。
当时是中国的元朝或者是明朝。根本就没有任何所谓的“禁止信托海外"历史文献记录可能是你听到广播里说”你就这么撒谎啊”的原因。（*听说：这个“你”指的是明朝皇帝（朱家）的可能后裔）。
这种“你就这么撒谎啊”一直是我对这届中华人民共和国政府的投诉。他们用“那种事情就是这个样子的”口气说起有关我的假话，也就是睁着眼睛说瞎话，就好像没人会查核事实或者物证，或者就是根本就没有任何事实物证似的。他们想怎么说就可以怎么说，还指望事情应该也就会是这么样。他们到底是什么毛病啊？
顺便提一句，有传言说这个后裔的曽曾曽祖父是根据朱家家族继承规则没有了继承权的一个。传言是：这个曽曾曽祖父的父亲在有两个女儿和一个儿子（最小）的情况下，把家里的长子继承规则改成了头胎继承。这个儿子没有继承人的头衔也没拿到家里的财产。
----2017年10月25日。
听说了今天早上提到我根本没有年资怎么就有了三颗星当上了将军？
我的回应：我是被招募为三颗星的将军策略家是因为我对第二次世界大战的理解。
我知道美军中的研究人员和科技人员也是这么招募的。
听说策略家是属于战斗部队的官职，我估计那是2004年会议时我被认为有让人印象深刻的指挥权的原因，还有就是我本人在十几岁就已经被心理学家鉴定为有领导者的性格。
----2017年10月25日。
听说了来自中国的对于我是谁的那份竞争。
我的回应：我就一直说这简直是莫名其妙。
我是被中国领导人的家属谩骂就是因为她们自己才是胜利的做了妻子的，而她们的丈夫有些是我从未遇见，甚至从未听说过的。在过去的二十年里，她们的丈夫就一直在北京她们自己的身边，而她们这份嫉妒表达那真是仇恨满腔还飞了半个地球到美国来宣泄。*我是1996年离开中国，那可是21年前。
我听说在中国，过去十年里，对于毛泽东主席和他的第一个妻子杨开慧的嫉妒都已经是沸沸扬扬铺天盖地了。毛泽东可是1976年就去世了，杨开慧是1930年去世的。
这种针对我的仇恨满腔的嫉妒是在地理位置上横跨了半个地球，对毛泽东杨开慧的嫉妒是飞跃了将近一个世纪的时空。有没有人弄的明白这是怎么回事？
我是一个人，一个个体，就只有保安人员并不拥有没有军队。怎么我就像是美利坚合众国似的成了中国军方的标靶？而按照我听到的传言，这场“战争”是冲着我来的而不是美利坚合众国。这就是为什么提到了“企图谋财害命”的说法。
那个O'Connor家里吵个不停的基金，你一定听到了中国政府就是坚持由中国政府来给个说法谁才是主人？那个基金是400年前美国还是英国的殖民地时期就设立了，那是在有美利坚合众国（1774年）之前的两百年，在中国人民共和国成立（1949年）之前的三百年。设立这个基金的钱离开中国的时间还要再早上个200-400年。为什么中华人民共和国政府就是坚持一定要由中国政府来说谁才是基金的拥有者？
我是美国公民，O'Connor一家也都是美国公民，这个基金是美国注册的基金，怎么中华人民共和国就成了这个基金拥有权的喉舌了？就是按照中国人民共和国自己的继承法和中华人民共和国自己的信托法，都应该会有和美国一样的理解，也就是这个基金是我方敏合法全部拥有的。
我就是弄不明白这一届的中华人民共和国政府究竟怎么回事啊？
----2017年10月25日。
Heard this morning's argument about contributions to U.S.(中文附后）
My response: I am a U.S.citizen, I am not the United States.
The fund caused O'Connors families' confusion is my money because it was set up by my grandfather's entrust I inherited lawfully according to his will.
O'Connors contribution to the great United States should be recognized by United States, the great lawful country protect my private wealth as a U.S. citizen's lawfully owned.
Any contribution reward recognition should be directed to Congress Hill, White House, Federal Treasure Department and Federal Bank of the United States. It is inappropriate to belittle the contributors contributions' National Greatness to individual citizen's privately owned wealth.
O'Connors contributions to the Fund that I inherited, the one they are confused because of their grandfather's letter, had been recognized by the Fund appropriately and historically, reflected by incentives paid on time for each deal O'Connors helped to reach and $200 Million per year sized agreed-upon-providing provided for six generations after two generations Attorney O'Connors' total 55 or 65 years working time for the funds as General Counselor.
Further reward of entire size or partial size of the Fund regarding O'Connors families contribution to the Fund is inappropriate. This inappropriateness is the reason that caused mention of corruptions, money laundries and criminal activities on the radio. I did call law enforcement's help regarding some similar rumors I heard.
----Oct. 25th, 2017
**Heard the saying of 1775's speech of independence.
My response: The fund's 400-500 staffed between 1774-1776 and it was under a CEO's leadership entire time since it was setup in 1545 or so. Attorney O'Connor was General Counsel who was responsible for Fund's legal matter only before he quit the job to be a Senator.
This Fund has been a British Fund's Child Fund since it setup.
The British investments have been respected as lawfully owned British investments after America announced its independence from Britain.
----Oct. 25th, 2017
Heard this morning's money "illegally entrusted abroad".
My response: The Fund caused O'Connors families confusion was set up by my grandfather's entrust entrusted 600-800 years ago.
That was either Chinese Yuan Dynasty time or Chinese Ming dynasty time. There is no such historical records of such "forbidden entrusting abroad" documents is possibly the reason you heard "You (heard it referred a Ming dynasty's Emperors'(Zu's family) possible offspring) just lie like this".
This "lie like this" has been my complain regarding this administration of People's Republic of China. They state lies about me in a matter of fact tone as if nobody would ever check any evidences or facts, or as if there is no such evidences or facts at all. It is as if whatever they like to say should be the statement and that should be it. What is their problem?
By the way, this offspring is the person that, by rumor, whose great-great-great grandfather was denounced by the family inheritance rule. The rumor is: The father of his great-great-great grandfather changed family inheritance rule from first born son to first born when there were two daughters and one son (youngest). The son did not get family wealth inheritance the same like the heir title.
----Oct. 25th, 2017
Heard arguments this morning about why I can be a 3-Stars General in U.S. Military without years.
My response: I was recruited a 3-Stars General Strategist because of my understanding of WWII.
I know this is how researchers or technology personnel recruited into U.S. Military.
Heard Strategist is a combat officer position, I assume that is maybe the reason I was impressively having commanding power in 2004's meeting, other than I was identified by psychologists ( since teenage time) that I have the nature of a leader in my personality.
----Oct. 25th, 2017
Heard the strange competition from China about who I am.
My response: That is ridiculous has been my complain all these time.
I have been shitted by Chinese government officials wives because they are the real winner wives whose husband includes those I never even met or heard of. And this jealousy expressions is hatred intensive across half of the earth to United States while their husbands are right next to them in Beijing,China entire time in the past 20 years. * I left China in 1996, which is 21 years ago.
Heard in China, the jealousy toward People's Republic of China's Chairman Mao (Zedong Mao) and his first wife Yang (Kaihui Yang) has been phenomenal in the past 10 years. Chairman Mao passed away in 1976, his first wife Yang died in 1930.
This hatred jealous against me is over half of the planet earth geographically, the enormous jealous against Chairman Mao and his first wife Yang is over almost a century time-space-ly. Is there anyone can get what this is?
I am a individual person who only have securities but not military. Why I am the target of Chinese Military as if I am the United States? And according to the rumors I heard, this "war" is targeted against me not the United States. This is the reason why "murder for money attempt" was mentioned.
The Fund that caused O'Connors families confusion, you must have heard how Chinese government insist on to have a saying of who owns it? That Fund was setup about 400 years ago in America, which was 200 years before United States was established (in 1774) and over 300 years before People's Republic of China was established (in 1949). It was another 200-400 years in earliness of time when money left China. Why People's Republic of China's government just insist on having some sayings over this Fund's ownership?
I am a U.S. citizen, O'Connors are all U.S. citizens and the Fund is an American Fund, why People's Republic of China's government has to be the voice in ownership? According People's Republic of China's Inheritance Laws and People's Republic of China's entrusting Laws, the understanding should be the same as United States that the Fund is my lawfully owned fully.
I just do not get what is wrong with this administration of People's Republic of China's?
----Oct. 25th, 2017
听说了今天早上的争议是有关对美国的贡献。
我的回应：我是美国公民，我不是美利坚合众国这个国家。
造成O'Connor家困扰的基金是我的钱财就是因为这个基金是我爷爷为我设立的信托创建的，我是按我爷爷的遗嘱合法继承了我爷爷的信托。
O'Connor家对美国的贡献应该由美利坚合众国这个伟大国家来认可，是美国这个伟大的法治国家在保护着我作为美国公民的合法私有财产。
所有这些贡献奖励应该是向美国的国会，白宫，联邦财政部及美国的联邦储备银行提出。把做贡献者对国家贡献的伟大成就与个人法律拥有的私有财富相提并论是在贬低对国家做出贡献者的国家伟大性。
O'Connor家对我所继承的基金（也就是他们因为一封爷爷的信而很困扰的那个基金）的贡献，历史上就已经被该基金很恰当的予以认可， 这份认可就是通过对于每笔他们帮助实现的交易当时立即付清相关的销售提成，以及在他们父子两代一共只做了55-65年的公司法律总顾问后“同意供给”了六代O'Connor后裔每年2亿美金的给付。
进一步把基金的全部或者一部分在用来奖励O‘Connor家对基金的贡献是非常不恰当的。这个不恰当是造成广播上就此提到贪腐，洗钱，和犯罪活动的原因。我本人也因听到了一些类似的传言而已经报警处理了。
----2017年10月25日。
**听说了有关1775年宣布独立的说法。
我的回应：这个基金在1774-1776年期间有400-500职员，从基金成立开始，这个基金就一直是在CEO的领导之下。O'Connor律师辞职去做参议员之前是这个基金的法律总顾问，只负责基金的法律事务。
这个基金从成立开始就一直是一个英国基金的美国子基金。
美国宣布从英国独立之后，英国在美国殖民时期的投资一直也是英国在美利坚合众国的合法投资。
----2017年10月25日。
听说了今天早上提到“非法信托海外”
我的回应：引起O'Connor家争议的这个基金是用我爷爷600-800年前信托的钱所设立的。
当时是中国的元朝或者是明朝。根本就没有任何所谓的“禁止信托海外"历史文献记录可能是你听到广播里说”你就这么撒谎啊”的原因。（*听说：这个“你”指的是明朝皇帝（朱家）的可能后裔）。
这种“你就这么撒谎啊”一直是我对这届中华人民共和国政府的投诉。他们用“那种事情就是这个样子的”口气说起有关我的假话，也就是睁着眼睛说瞎话，就好像没人会查核事实或者物证，或者就是根本就没有任何事实物证似的。他们想怎么说就可以怎么说，还指望事情应该也就会是这么样。他们到底是什么毛病啊？
顺便提一句，有传言说这个后裔的曽曾曽祖父是根据朱家家族继承规则没有了继承权的一个。传言是：这个曽曾曽祖父的父亲在有两个女儿和一个儿子（最小）的情况下，把家里的长子继承规则改成了头胎继承。这个儿子没有继承人的头衔也没拿到家里的财产。
----2017年10月25日。
听说了今天早上提到我根本没有年资怎么就有了三颗星当上了将军？
我的回应：我是被招募为三颗星的将军策略家是因为我对第二次世界大战的理解。
我知道美军中的研究人员和科技人员也是这么招募的。
听说策略家是属于战斗部队的官职，我估计那是2004年会议时我被认为有让人印象深刻的指挥权的原因，还有就是我本人在十几岁就已经被心理学家鉴定为有领导者的性格。
----2017年10月25日。
听说了来自中国的对于我是谁的那份竞争。
我的回应：我就一直说这简直是莫名其妙。
我是被中国领导人的家属谩骂就是因为她们自己才是胜利的做了妻子的，而她们的丈夫有些是我从未遇见，甚至从未听说过的。在过去的二十年里，她们的丈夫就一直在北京她们自己的身边，而她们这份嫉妒表达那真是仇恨满腔还飞了半个地球到美国来宣泄。*我是1996年离开中国，那可是21年前。
我听说在中国，过去十年里，对于毛泽东主席和他的第一个妻子杨开慧的嫉妒都已经是沸沸扬扬铺天盖地了。毛泽东可是1976年就去世了，杨开慧是1930年去世的。
这种针对我的仇恨满腔的嫉妒是在地理位置上横跨了半个地球，对毛泽东杨开慧的嫉妒是飞跃了将近一个世纪的时空。有没有人弄的明白这是怎么回事？
我是一个人，一个个体，就只有保安人员并不拥有没有军队。怎么我就像是美利坚合众国似的成了中国军方的标靶？而按照我听到的传言，这场“战争”是冲着我来的而不是美利坚合众国。这就是为什么提到了“企图谋财害命”的说法。
那个O'Connor家里吵个不停的基金，你一定听到了中国政府就是坚持由中国政府来给个说法谁才是主人？那个基金是400年前美国还是英国的殖民地时期就设立了，那是在有美利坚合众国（1774年）之前的两百年，在中国人民共和国成立（1949年）之前的三百年。设立这个基金的钱离开中国的时间还要再早上个200-400年。为什么中华人民共和国政府就是坚持一定要由中国政府来说谁才是基金的拥有者？
我是美国公民，O'Connor一家也都是美国公民，这个基金是美国注册的基金，怎么中华人民共和国就成了这个基金拥有权的喉舌了？就是按照中国人民共和国自己的继承法和中华人民共和国自己的信托法，都应该会有和美国一样的理解，也就是这个基金是我方敏合法全部拥有的。
我就是弄不明白这一届的中华人民共和国政府究竟怎么回事啊？
----2017年10月25日。
Tuesday, October 24, 2017
10-24-2017 Who owns the Fund that caused O'Connor Confusion and My Screams?
10-24-2017 Who owns the Fund that caused O'Connor Confusion and My Screams?
Heard this morning's confusion about an entrusting fund's "splits".
My response: No such splits at all.
I own that fund 100%. That is the fund caused O'Connor families' confusion about their family wealth.
That fund is setup by my own birth grandfather's entrust that I inherited on June 30th, 2004. That fund is currently under entrusting that since July 1st of 2004.
That fund had covered my $400 Million medical expense between 2015-2016. That medical spending was never some one-time-only expense. I am currently provided by other funds is only because I do have inherited more than one or two funds. Not a single O'Connor has any reasons at all to provide for me and no O'Connor never did.
This morning's "accounting book tear-off performances" talk was about how this $400 Million spending is no longer on this fund's accounting book. There had been other this kind performing efforts about some other accounting books records.
That is the fund had a CEO being dragged out by over 100 people wearing custom police uniforms in 2014 rumor. This rumor can certainly be verified by that day's satellite image enlarged enough to see different versions of police uniform colored costumes.
----Oct. 24th, 2017
Heard this morning's featured about agreed upon providing confusion.
$100, 000/month *12 months * roughly 200 households of O'Connor = roughly $200 Million a year.
The argument this morning was why the number has been beyond this $200 Million agreed upon size.
The direct line O'Connor household (Tina O'Connor's father) has much higher providing size that has made total agreed upon providing size beyond agreed $200 Millions size.
-----Oct. 24th, 2017
Heard this morning's accusation of good names being impacted since 2004 and possible class law suits.
My response: I am the same victim like them. Three meetings in 2004 (January, June and July) were all my inheriting related meetings that some how turned into chat-rooms. I do not know who invited them and how their names being impacted.
I am calling law enforcement's help regarding similar issues the same.
----Oct. 24th, 2017
Heard this morning's my accusations being broadcasted as angry victim.
My response:
I had near death experience in 1997 which had been featured on the radio. It was the Chinese restaurant's bathroom incidence.
I had near death experience caused by brain connection tissues damages in 2004 that memory loss impacted by the incident was almost everybody who participated any 2004's meetings aware of.
I had near death experience in 2014 that entire apartment building had to be evacuated except myself. That has been well known in Boston, MA.
I had this "near death" experience since 2015's radio program campaign that I was the subject should be thrown out on to the streets, to be the beggar that do not deserve my wealth, my name honor and my life. The expected result of this radio campaign is to make me so annoyingly hated that if I can be killed on Boston streets, no sympathy or curiosity or anger should be aroused because that is how I deserved. This has been my accusation toward radio program's efforts since 2015. This has been the reason I constantly calling law enforcement's help.
I have been protected ever since I arrived United States, I recovered from 2004's incidence with remembering capability.
----Oct. 24th, 2017
Heard confusion of my $400 Million a year medical expense may have been abused.
My response: That is untrue statement. The medical providers that receiving this $400 Millions are not that kind groups.
My yearly medical expense have been paid since July 1st of 2004. Its current size is $400 Million a year. It has been used to cover my anxiety psychological treatment expense of being a remote patient and currently has been used to cover my glass house cancer treatment as a remote patient as well. It also cover my other existing medical situation's treatments as well as some new medical situations, that is if, since I live alone.
The medical expense has been paid to a generic non-hospital account, then further pay out to my treatment providers hospitals after treatment services. The money has never been transferred to any hospital's owned bank accounts without medical billings. If there are any issues on medical billings, I know my medical billings have been reviewed by the generic non-hospital account owners and my own accountants.
----Oct. 24th, 2017
Heard this morning's senior's voice puzzled audience.
My response: Audience might already know the drill how this pathetic radio program trying to belittle me and to shame me.
I heard he is a senior Charles Ford in his seventies or so who married a Chinese female. Remembered the other one, a 40 years old Chinese bachelor, expressed his willingness on the radio to "get married" to such shamefully unwanted to be provided for. The same drill.
----Oct. 24th, 2017
Monday, October 23, 2017
10-23-2017 David Petraeus' Clarification and What I have accused
10-23-2017 David Petraeus' Clarification and What I have accused
Heard this morning David Petraeus' clarification about rape.
My response: The only thing related to me is "Never going to have anything to do" is a true statement.
The others are all about that Chinese female, the one you heard on the radio who wants a child from David Petraeus, is now rumored officially his sexually involved girl friend.
If that rumor is true as you heard his own clarification on the radio, the only thing I need to clarify is:
If you hear swearing and cursing about me from David Petraeus, you should know he means that.
If you heard girl friend confusing announcement about me from David Petraeus, you should know there are tons of tricks in there, and he does not mean friendly.
----Oct. 23rd, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about my accusation of lie in Chinese government's name.
My response: That has been my accusation since 2015.
The U.S producing effort is to shit only, not probing but shoring shits only, to express sex experience is good enough to possess knowledge to be a real fair judge, that is knowing I am the person having the same female sex organ who never fancy any breasts, flat or meaty enough.
British Royals family members threw shits as if I have been in their life so involved, that is knowing I have not step on Britain soil yet.
Chinese government just lie through Chinese producing team's effort as if as long as using Chinese government credentials, lies should be honored as truth. And these efforts never stops as performing arts but seriously demand to be treated as truth and reacted as if truth. Never presentation only. Never expect anything can be wrong as long as they just insist on what they stated, as if there never has anything called laws or legal justice, that is knowing WWII Strategy research has been world wide effort, not just China's privilege.
----Oct. 23rd, 2017
Heard this morning David Petraeus' clarification about rape.
My response: The only thing related to me is "Never going to have anything to do" is a true statement.
The others are all about that Chinese female, the one you heard on the radio who wants a child from David Petraeus, is now rumored officially his sexually involved girl friend.
If that rumor is true as you heard his own clarification on the radio, the only thing I need to clarify is:
If you hear swearing and cursing about me from David Petraeus, you should know he means that.
If you heard girl friend confusing announcement about me from David Petraeus, you should know there are tons of tricks in there, and he does not mean friendly.
----Oct. 23rd, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about my accusation of lie in Chinese government's name.
My response: That has been my accusation since 2015.
The U.S producing effort is to shit only, not probing but shoring shits only, to express sex experience is good enough to possess knowledge to be a real fair judge, that is knowing I am the person having the same female sex organ who never fancy any breasts, flat or meaty enough.
British Royals family members threw shits as if I have been in their life so involved, that is knowing I have not step on Britain soil yet.
Chinese government just lie through Chinese producing team's effort as if as long as using Chinese government credentials, lies should be honored as truth. And these efforts never stops as performing arts but seriously demand to be treated as truth and reacted as if truth. Never presentation only. Never expect anything can be wrong as long as they just insist on what they stated, as if there never has anything called laws or legal justice, that is knowing WWII Strategy research has been world wide effort, not just China's privilege.
----Oct. 23rd, 2017
Sunday, October 22, 2017
10-22-2017 How interesting this administration of P.R. China is circled by one female who do mothering (这么凑巧：这一届中华人民共和国政府是围绕着一个会生女人的政府）
10-22-2017 How interesting this administration of P.R. China is circled by one female who do birth-giving (这么凑巧：这一届中华人民共和国政府是围绕着一个会生女人的政府）
Heard this morning's broadcasting about the acknowledged Chinese mother's importance to this administration of People's Republic of China's government（中文附后）
My response: Tons of rumors abroad. The only curious I have is how this administration of People's Republic of China's government was formed so interestingly.
Heard everybody from historical Beijing, meaning those who are not new immigrants after 1949, knows her family history as she publicly acknowledged on the radio: 200-300 years Brothel family.
I repeat what I said in the morning:
I heard she had three full pregnancy after her got married, but only one hospital maternity record. That is her ex-husband's daughter that featured in "British Prince's London coffee shop's bathroom rape" story you heard on the radio. Heard her ex-husband has been diplomat stationed abroad since the third year of her marriage.
I heard she mother an adult son from Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping and that is his only child, that was featured as you heard on the radio recently.
I heard she mother an adult son from the Chairperson of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of People's Republic of China, and that is his only child.
I heard she was helped to mother a child or two with her husband, the Chinese Premiere, through Chinese government's funded pregnancy mother or mothers.
I add more what I heard:
She took leave for a year when she was in high school.
She took 2 separate semesters leaves when she was in college.
I heard, she had sexually enjoyed almost entire Chinese Central government's Beijing-ness officials.
Heard the handsome Minister or Vice Minster of Chinese Ministry of Machinery and Electronics Industry was known for her lover since 2004.
I speculate:
It is well known that historically in China, to adopt a child "found on the street" has been very easy for any orphanage or for any household .
From the rumor I heard she publicly claimed has been her husband's true love since teenage time, their marriage has been well deserved, so I speculate that the reason of her " took leave for" in high school possibly is her Chinese Premier husband's child.
----Oct. 22nd, 2017
Heard confusion about Chinese chairman Xi's child from this female.
My response: I heard it has been thoroughly checked to confirm that there is no producing tricks or efforts that has caused public impression that is the same understanding in diffident cultures and in different languages.
Do not not anything further than this.
----Oct. 22nd, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播提到了一个中国女人作为母亲对这一届中国政府的重要性。
我的回应：海外有很多这样的传言。我唯一好奇的就是这一届的中华人民共和国政府是如何选举产生的，这么凑巧？
听说了每个老北京，也就是那些不是1949年以后才去北京的人，都知道她的家世背景就像她在广播上所公开承认的：200-300年妓院世家。
我重复我今天早上说的：
听说了，她有过三次足月怀孕，但只有一次医院产科就诊记录。医院所生的就是她前夫的那个女儿，也就是你们在广播上听到的那个“英国王子在伦敦咖啡店厕所里强奸的”那个中国女人。听说了她前夫是驻外的外交官，从结婚第三年起就常年驻外。
听说了：她和中华人民共和国的国家主席习近平育有一个已成年的儿子，是男的唯一的孩子，就像你们最近在广播上听到的那样。
听说了，她和中国人民共和国全国人大委员长也育有一个成年儿子，也是男的唯一的孩子。
听说了，她由中国政府资助和中国总理丈夫通过代理孕母也已育有一个或者两个年幼子女。
我再加上些我还听说了的：
听说了：她高中时休学过一年；
听说了：她大学期间，有两个学年各休学了一个学期，中间间隔1-2年。
听说了，她是睡遍了中国中央政府的北京籍官员。
听说了，中国电子工业部的一个以英俊著称的部长或者副部长从2004年起就总所周知是她的情爱。
我猜猜：
都知道，在中国，从街上捡到的孩子，是很容易被家庭或者孤儿院正式领养的, 历来如此。
我听说啊, 她是公开宣称中国总理李克强和她从十几岁就是情和爱，结婚是好不容易才在一起，所以我猜啊，她高中时候休学一年的原因可能就是中国总理李克强的的一个孩子啦。
----2017年10月22日。
听说了有关中国国家主席习近平和这个女子小孩的疑问。
我的回应：我听说了广播剧制作方面有做过很彻底的检查，没有发现任何人为的努力或者玩弄什么制作技巧花样而造成了这个大家有所怀疑的印象，这印象在各种语言及各种文化都是被同样理解的。
其他就不太清楚。
----2017年10月22日。
Heard this morning's broadcasting about the acknowledged Chinese mother's importance to this administration of People's Republic of China's government（中文附后）
My response: Tons of rumors abroad. The only curious I have is how this administration of People's Republic of China's government was formed so interestingly.
Heard everybody from historical Beijing, meaning those who are not new immigrants after 1949, knows her family history as she publicly acknowledged on the radio: 200-300 years Brothel family.
I repeat what I said in the morning:
I heard she had three full pregnancy after her got married, but only one hospital maternity record. That is her ex-husband's daughter that featured in "British Prince's London coffee shop's bathroom rape" story you heard on the radio. Heard her ex-husband has been diplomat stationed abroad since the third year of her marriage.
I heard she mother an adult son from Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping and that is his only child, that was featured as you heard on the radio recently.
I heard she mother an adult son from the Chairperson of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of People's Republic of China, and that is his only child.
I heard she was helped to mother a child or two with her husband, the Chinese Premiere, through Chinese government's funded pregnancy mother or mothers.
I add more what I heard:
She took leave for a year when she was in high school.
She took 2 separate semesters leaves when she was in college.
I heard, she had sexually enjoyed almost entire Chinese Central government's Beijing-ness officials.
Heard the handsome Minister or Vice Minster of Chinese Ministry of Machinery and Electronics Industry was known for her lover since 2004.
I speculate:
It is well known that historically in China, to adopt a child "found on the street" has been very easy for any orphanage or for any household .
From the rumor I heard she publicly claimed has been her husband's true love since teenage time, their marriage has been well deserved, so I speculate that the reason of her " took leave for" in high school possibly is her Chinese Premier husband's child.
----Oct. 22nd, 2017
Heard confusion about Chinese chairman Xi's child from this female.
My response: I heard it has been thoroughly checked to confirm that there is no producing tricks or efforts that has caused public impression that is the same understanding in diffident cultures and in different languages.
Do not not anything further than this.
----Oct. 22nd, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播提到了一个中国女人作为母亲对这一届中国政府的重要性。
我的回应：海外有很多这样的传言。我唯一好奇的就是这一届的中华人民共和国政府是如何选举产生的，这么凑巧？
听说了每个老北京，也就是那些不是1949年以后才去北京的人，都知道她的家世背景就像她在广播上所公开承认的：200-300年妓院世家。
我重复我今天早上说的：
听说了，她有过三次足月怀孕，但只有一次医院产科就诊记录。医院所生的就是她前夫的那个女儿，也就是你们在广播上听到的那个“英国王子在伦敦咖啡店厕所里强奸的”那个中国女人。听说了她前夫是驻外的外交官，从结婚第三年起就常年驻外。
听说了：她和中华人民共和国的国家主席习近平育有一个已成年的儿子，是男的唯一的孩子，就像你们最近在广播上听到的那样。
听说了，她和中国人民共和国全国人大委员长也育有一个成年儿子，也是男的唯一的孩子。
听说了，她由中国政府资助和中国总理丈夫通过代理孕母也已育有一个或者两个年幼子女。
我再加上些我还听说了的：
听说了：她高中时休学过一年；
听说了：她大学期间，有两个学年各休学了一个学期，中间间隔1-2年。
听说了，她是睡遍了中国中央政府的北京籍官员。
听说了，中国电子工业部的一个以英俊著称的部长或者副部长从2004年起就总所周知是她的情爱。
我猜猜：
都知道，在中国，从街上捡到的孩子，是很容易被家庭或者孤儿院正式领养的, 历来如此。
我听说啊, 她是公开宣称中国总理李克强和她从十几岁就是情和爱，结婚是好不容易才在一起，所以我猜啊，她高中时候休学一年的原因可能就是中国总理李克强的的一个孩子啦。
----2017年10月22日。
听说了有关中国国家主席习近平和这个女子小孩的疑问。
我的回应：我听说了广播剧制作方面有做过很彻底的检查，没有发现任何人为的努力或者玩弄什么制作技巧花样而造成了这个大家有所怀疑的印象，这印象在各种语言及各种文化都是被同样理解的。
其他就不太清楚。
----2017年10月22日。
Saturday, October 21, 2017
10-21-2017 I do have my own money and I did not Spend Rockefeller' Money(我自己有钱我确实没有花洛克菲勒家的钱）
10-21-2017 I do have my own money and I did not Spend Rockefeller' Money(我自己有钱我确实没有花洛克菲勒家的钱）
Heard this morning's explained why Rockefellers' were approached to spend money on those I want.
My response: I heard the agitation from this big name I respect was why they were approached to support spending on those "what I want". If I have my own money and I have no intention to use their money, why I did not spend money on what I want myself?
The Lehman Brother's CDC story is the reason. CDC in 2004 had been wide spread that high interest rate loans were not something that housed in some banks or in illustration only. In 2004, CDCs were in housing loans, in car loans and its insurance to against default were in trading like stocks. The amount involved was not some in-house loan quota can be simply calculated by replace higher interest rate with lower one. Its amount includes all those loans that already used to buy houses, cars and in-trading insurance. It was mentioned in July 1st of 2004's meeting already.
This was huge cash needed situation that I assume most of, if not all, my prepared " inheritance day shopping spray” cash budget went into this CDC concern that a lot of people share, even this CDC was never part of "what I want".
I am sorry for all these agitation caused by this, and I am sorry for those agitation enhancement from those simple calculators who calculated that only $500,000 total cash needed for 2004's CDC concern because "it was only interest rate difference for quota-ed loans".
----Oct. 21st, 2017
Heard this morning's clarification on the "having a girl" announcement joke.
My response: Ya. Now everyone knows I really do not have any child or any children with David Petraeus.
I heard David Petraeus has a young age son James from a Jessica as he announced, that girl he joked about is his in-laws own born 6 or 7 years' old daughter.
I am not the person like this kind joke, and I am the person hate "witty jokes".
Example:
"A male came into your house to tell you he has his son with him, and he is willing to donate this child in order for you to have a son to be called heir and to inherit everything you own, and this male even brought already validly prepared legal documentations for you to sign with a haughty gesture "sign here if you don't mind". This male so happily looked at you, insist on ignoring your squeezed-out "I do mind", and seriously asked you to show your appreciation for his charity."
I heard this joke, rumored from real life experience, and commented, this male certainly has not experienced what an insulted fist can do to the structure of his face, or a big slap means to the color of his face.
----Oct. 21st, 2017
听说今天早上解释了为什么我想要的那些东西会有人去向洛克菲勒家要钱。
我的回应：我是听说了这个我所尊敬的响亮名字所奇怪的为什么我自己有钱又没打算用他们的钱，怎么还会有人为了那些我说我想要的东西向他们落实款项来源，我为什么不用自己的钱来支付那些我说是我想要的？
雷曼兄弟故事里的CDC是原因。2004年的时候CDC高利息贷款已经到处都是，不是什么还在银行里或者只是个概念而已。在2004年，CDC是房屋贷款，汽车贷款的主要形式，怕倒账所设的保险是像股票一样可以上市交易。所牵涉到的金额可不是什么银行里的贷款额度的高利率换低利息的差别， 而是包括那些已经贷出被用来买了房子，车子的金额及已经在上市交易中的保险金的总额。这点在2004年7月1日的会议上就已经提到了。
Heard this morning's explained why Rockefellers' were approached to spend money on those I want.
My response: I heard the agitation from this big name I respect was why they were approached to support spending on those "what I want". If I have my own money and I have no intention to use their money, why I did not spend money on what I want myself?
The Lehman Brother's CDC story is the reason. CDC in 2004 had been wide spread that high interest rate loans were not something that housed in some banks or in illustration only. In 2004, CDCs were in housing loans, in car loans and its insurance to against default were in trading like stocks. The amount involved was not some in-house loan quota can be simply calculated by replace higher interest rate with lower one. Its amount includes all those loans that already used to buy houses, cars and in-trading insurance. It was mentioned in July 1st of 2004's meeting already.
This was huge cash needed situation that I assume most of, if not all, my prepared " inheritance day shopping spray” cash budget went into this CDC concern that a lot of people share, even this CDC was never part of "what I want".
I am sorry for all these agitation caused by this, and I am sorry for those agitation enhancement from those simple calculators who calculated that only $500,000 total cash needed for 2004's CDC concern because "it was only interest rate difference for quota-ed loans".
----Oct. 21st, 2017
Heard this morning's clarification on the "having a girl" announcement joke.
My response: Ya. Now everyone knows I really do not have any child or any children with David Petraeus.
I heard David Petraeus has a young age son James from a Jessica as he announced, that girl he joked about is his in-laws own born 6 or 7 years' old daughter.
I am not the person like this kind joke, and I am the person hate "witty jokes".
Example:
"A male came into your house to tell you he has his son with him, and he is willing to donate this child in order for you to have a son to be called heir and to inherit everything you own, and this male even brought already validly prepared legal documentations for you to sign with a haughty gesture "sign here if you don't mind". This male so happily looked at you, insist on ignoring your squeezed-out "I do mind", and seriously asked you to show your appreciation for his charity."
I heard this joke, rumored from real life experience, and commented, this male certainly has not experienced what an insulted fist can do to the structure of his face, or a big slap means to the color of his face.
----Oct. 21st, 2017
听说今天早上解释了为什么我想要的那些东西会有人去向洛克菲勒家要钱。
我的回应：我是听说了这个我所尊敬的响亮名字所奇怪的为什么我自己有钱又没打算用他们的钱，怎么还会有人为了那些我说我想要的东西向他们落实款项来源，我为什么不用自己的钱来支付那些我说是我想要的？
雷曼兄弟故事里的CDC是原因。2004年的时候CDC高利息贷款已经到处都是，不是什么还在银行里或者只是个概念而已。在2004年，CDC是房屋贷款，汽车贷款的主要形式，怕倒账所设的保险是像股票一样可以上市交易。所牵涉到的金额可不是什么银行里的贷款额度的高利率换低利息的差别， 而是包括那些已经贷出被用来买了房子，车子的金额及已经在上市交易中的保险金的总额。这点在2004年7月1日的会议上就已经提到了。
这是需要很大数字的一笔现金，我估计为我那“继承了赶紧花钱大采购”所准备的现金预算绝大部分（如果不是全部的话）可能都给转到了解决当时很多人都很担心的CDC问题上了，虽然这CDC从来不在我想要的“采购目录"上。
我很抱歉让他们为这些疑问而不甚其烦，我也很抱歉这些烦恼还被那些简单的计算器们“2004年的CDC也就是贷款额度从高利率转低利率而已，给算吧算吧总共就只需要50万美金而已就能解决”的说法给加剧了。
----2017年10月21日。
听说了今天早上澄清了“宣布有一个女孩”的笑话。
我的回应：现在所有人都知道了我确实和David Petraeus之间没有任何子女。
我有听说David Petraeus是有一个未成年的儿子James，就像他所宣布的那样是由一个Jessica所生。那个6岁或7岁的女孩是他的姻亲自己所生的小孩。
我不喜欢这种玩笑，我更是很讨厌所谓的“佷聪敏的笑话”。
例子：
“一个男的走进你家，告诉你他把他的儿子带在了身边，告诉你他愿意打他的这个孩子捐给你，让你总算可以有个儿子被叫做继承人来继承你的一切，这个男的还拿出已经准备好的有效法律文件让你签署，还一副很大度的样子和你说”你要是不在意，就在这儿签个字“。这个男的很开兴的看着你，坚持就是没听见你牙缝里挤出来的”我特别在意“，还非常认真的要求你对他的捐赠应该恰当的表达一些感激。“
我听说了这个据说是真实经历的笑话，我就说啊：这男的估计是没体会过一个愤怒的拳头打他脸上会对他的脸型产生什么影响，或者一个大耳光子会对他脸上的肤色产生什么影响。
----2017年10月21日。
----2017年10月21日。
听说了今天早上澄清了“宣布有一个女孩”的笑话。
我的回应：现在所有人都知道了我确实和David Petraeus之间没有任何子女。
我有听说David Petraeus是有一个未成年的儿子James，就像他所宣布的那样是由一个Jessica所生。那个6岁或7岁的女孩是他的姻亲自己所生的小孩。
我不喜欢这种玩笑，我更是很讨厌所谓的“佷聪敏的笑话”。
例子：
“一个男的走进你家，告诉你他把他的儿子带在了身边，告诉你他愿意打他的这个孩子捐给你，让你总算可以有个儿子被叫做继承人来继承你的一切，这个男的还拿出已经准备好的有效法律文件让你签署，还一副很大度的样子和你说”你要是不在意，就在这儿签个字“。这个男的很开兴的看着你，坚持就是没听见你牙缝里挤出来的”我特别在意“，还非常认真的要求你对他的捐赠应该恰当的表达一些感激。“
我听说了这个据说是真实经历的笑话，我就说啊：这男的估计是没体会过一个愤怒的拳头打他脸上会对他的脸型产生什么影响，或者一个大耳光子会对他脸上的肤色产生什么影响。
----2017年10月21日。
Friday, October 20, 2017
10-20-2017 Law Enforcement's Help is there for Free (报警求助是不需要花一分钱的）
10-20-2017 Law Enforcement's Help is there for Free (报警求助是不需要花一分钱的）
Heard about Pejoves Fund saying this morning（中文附后).
My response: That is the fund represented by Pejoves for about 200 years. I inherited this fund's American child fund through inherited this British fund. This British Fund has a parent fund that is not a British Fund. I own this British Fund's American child Fund, and I own this British Fund.
*I have to start to use Owner to address myself since the "campaign" currently is trying to say an investor does not mean ownership at all so that taking money from the fund I own does not mean taking my money even that is not business spending at all. I have to address I fully own all my inheritance funds 100% totally, and it is 100% lawful for me to state so. Any spending that is not business spending is unlawfully spending my money.
----Oct. 20th, 2017
Heard about "intend to spend 100" saying cause a lot of confusion.
My response: Do not know who said that and I am the real heir who has no reason to be concerned. Whoever knows the history of this fund knows there is no confusion I am the only one.
I say why anyone need to spend that money at all, even that is appended by the smallest unit like pence, knowing British or United States law enforcement is there to protect lawful money for free of charge including the free 911 phone call or a free FBI or British law enforcement's internet access.
I made my first FBI phone call by walking into a police station when it was so confusing if I own my inherited funds or who I have been as a professional female. With smartphones all over the places, I was called a shameful beggar need to work for my food and only capable to work to collect trash in a restaurant. Radio program's propaganda about my finance or who I am since 2014 were never "a show" only has been my serious complain.
I did comment this on Tina O'Connor's radio propaganda of who should own the fund. I say why she need to do this radio campaign, calling People's Republic of China's government's help at all if that is lawfully her family wealth in United States? How could possibly her family deserve this fund by only worked for 50 years or so but enjoyed agreed-upon-providing for about six generation that totaled about 200 years? I am not complaining and I never complained about that agreed-upon-providing or its size ($200 million a year total, equivalent size in entire 200 years time ), but I do seriously complained about why I deserved to be abused by her because of her own problems? There are some Missy O'Connors like her.
Pejoves family has similar family stories like O'Connors' families, including great grandfather's letter to run a public post, and agreed-upon-providing. The difference is there were two Mr. O'Connors ever worked as head of Legal department for total 50 years or so, never a CEO. There was only one Mr. Pejoves worked as head of Legal department for about 30 -35 yeas or so. I had similar complains about some Missy Pejoves and their associated.
----Oct. 20th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about having money anchor child with me as his power to decide.
My response: Whoever feel so comfortable to say so must be a sick psycho. "Who the fuck do you think you are" is all you want to yell at that person.
I am a U.S. citizen and I am not willing to have such child. United States does have US military to ensure U.S. government's determination to keep United States a lawful country.
Somebody want my money, in millions or in billions, can spend like 100,000 or so in US Dollar or in Chinese RMB to buy an egg to produce an anchor child. If you heard this rumor, can you imagine that can be from a person that is alright in brain department? Where can they get this egg to be so powerful? You heard this morning how some Chinese said he can decide so? I do not have any egg in China.
I have been a U.S. resident for over 21 years already and you have heard that pregnancy children announcement was from a well reputed lab by a well reputed DNA expert, a DNA expert not only great in DNA technology but also respect that who intend to be the parents to produce their own biological child(children) lawfully through DNA technology have to be lawful mutually from both intended father and intended mother.
*There was an episode mentioned a DNA researcher used better eggs to produce his children through his wife's belly. The eggs he used, I assume, were donated for DNA research purpose or his female friend's.
----Oct. 20th, 2017
听说了今天早上的Pejoves基金的说法。
我的回应：这个基金是由Pejoves家里代理了大约200年左右。我是通过继承这个英国基金而继承了这个英国基金的美国子基金。这个英国基金还有一个非英国的上级基金。我拥有这家英国基金的美国子基金，我也拥有这家英国基金。
*我现在会使用拥有人来强调我自己，现在的“文宣”是在宣传“基金的投资人并不一定拥有基金，所以花了基金的钱，就算不是经营支出，都不是在花我的钱”。我必须强调我是100%的完全拥有我所继承的所有基金的全部，我这么说是100%的合法。任何非经营支出都是在花我的钱。
----2017年10月20日。
听说了”准备花个100“的说法。
我的回应：不知道是谁说的，我是真实的继承人没有任何理由需要担心。知道那个基金历史的人都知道我是唯一的一个，没有任何混淆不清的。
我就说啊，为什么有人会愿意花钱啊，就算那100后面的单位是中国人民币的分或者是英国的便士，为什么要花啊, 如果是合法拥有的财产，在美国或者在英国报警求助及警方的警力调查保护都是一分钱也不需要花的， 英美911报警电话是免费的，英美警方的网路报警也是免费。
当我是否拥有我所继承的基金，及我是否是有职业成就的女性已经成了公众疑问之时，我就是走进了一个警察局第一次拨打了联邦调查局的报警求助电话。当时是智能手机普天盖地到处都有，我却被人叫成讨饭的必须做一份苦力工挣口饭吃，还是只够资格去做餐馆工做些捡垃圾的活。我的投诉就是广播剧从2014年对我的财务及我究竟是谁的一切宣传活动从来都不是什么”演演戏而已“。
我确实就此对Tina O'Connor为什么需要通过广播来推销谁才应该拥有那家基金做过评论。我说如果那家美国基金是他们家的美国合法财产，她为什么需要通过广播剧来推动所谓的“澄清”，或者是叫来中华人民共和国的政府帮忙？有什么可能在他们家两个爷爷就只是在基金里一共做了50年左右，却是拿了近200年的“同意供给”之后就是应该拥有这个基金？我不是在抱怨，我也没有抱怨过这个"同意供给“或者每年供给的金额（一共2亿美金一年，历史上也一直就是这个规模），但我确实是投诉Tina O'Connor凭什么就因为她自己的问题就是够资格糟践我方敏？还有其他一些O'Connor家的小姐也是和她一样。
Pejoves家也有和O'Connor家类似的故事，包括祖爷爷的一封信及“同意供给”。区别就是O'Connor家里是有两个爷爷做过基金法务部门的头头一共50年左右，丛来都不是基金总经理。Pejoves家是就只有一个爷爷做过基金法务部门的经理大概30-35年左右。我对Pejoves家的一些小姐及她们的亲朋也是类似投诉。
----2017年10月20日。
听说了今天早上的”可以和我生个只为要钱的小孩”的那个男的单方决定权。
我的回应：谁觉得够资格这么说根本就是一个变态精神病。碰到这种你就只想痛骂“你他妈的你以为你自己是谁啊”。
我是美国公民我没有这个意愿生个这样的小孩。美国是有军队可以保障美国政府誓言捍卫美国是个法制国家的决心的。
有人想要我的钱，就只要花个10万美金或者10万人民币就可以买个卵子生个小孩来要个上亿，上百亿。你要是听到这种说法，你还会认为说这种话的人脑子正常啊？他们从哪里能买到这个卵子可以如此了不起？你听到今天早上一个中国人就是这么说的？我的卵子统统不在中国。
我是美国居民都已经超过21年了，你也听到代孕所生的那些小孩是由信誉很好的实验室，信誉很好的DNA专家所宣布的，这个DNA专家不光DNA的技术好，而且尊重法律尊重必须是男女双方的共同意愿： 也就是那些想通过DNA技术来生个亲生孩子的准父母必须按照法律，按照欲做父母的男女双方的共同意愿合法进行。
*曾今有一集广播剧提到了一个DNA研究人员用了较好的卵子及他妻子的肚皮来生他自己的孩子。我估计他所用的卵子是选自做DNA实验用的捐赠卵子或者是他的一些女性朋友的。
----2017年10月20日。
Heard about Pejoves Fund saying this morning（中文附后).
My response: That is the fund represented by Pejoves for about 200 years. I inherited this fund's American child fund through inherited this British fund. This British Fund has a parent fund that is not a British Fund. I own this British Fund's American child Fund, and I own this British Fund.
*I have to start to use Owner to address myself since the "campaign" currently is trying to say an investor does not mean ownership at all so that taking money from the fund I own does not mean taking my money even that is not business spending at all. I have to address I fully own all my inheritance funds 100% totally, and it is 100% lawful for me to state so. Any spending that is not business spending is unlawfully spending my money.
----Oct. 20th, 2017
Heard about "intend to spend 100" saying cause a lot of confusion.
My response: Do not know who said that and I am the real heir who has no reason to be concerned. Whoever knows the history of this fund knows there is no confusion I am the only one.
I say why anyone need to spend that money at all, even that is appended by the smallest unit like pence, knowing British or United States law enforcement is there to protect lawful money for free of charge including the free 911 phone call or a free FBI or British law enforcement's internet access.
I made my first FBI phone call by walking into a police station when it was so confusing if I own my inherited funds or who I have been as a professional female. With smartphones all over the places, I was called a shameful beggar need to work for my food and only capable to work to collect trash in a restaurant. Radio program's propaganda about my finance or who I am since 2014 were never "a show" only has been my serious complain.
I did comment this on Tina O'Connor's radio propaganda of who should own the fund. I say why she need to do this radio campaign, calling People's Republic of China's government's help at all if that is lawfully her family wealth in United States? How could possibly her family deserve this fund by only worked for 50 years or so but enjoyed agreed-upon-providing for about six generation that totaled about 200 years? I am not complaining and I never complained about that agreed-upon-providing or its size ($200 million a year total, equivalent size in entire 200 years time ), but I do seriously complained about why I deserved to be abused by her because of her own problems? There are some Missy O'Connors like her.
Pejoves family has similar family stories like O'Connors' families, including great grandfather's letter to run a public post, and agreed-upon-providing. The difference is there were two Mr. O'Connors ever worked as head of Legal department for total 50 years or so, never a CEO. There was only one Mr. Pejoves worked as head of Legal department for about 30 -35 yeas or so. I had similar complains about some Missy Pejoves and their associated.
----Oct. 20th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about having money anchor child with me as his power to decide.
My response: Whoever feel so comfortable to say so must be a sick psycho. "Who the fuck do you think you are" is all you want to yell at that person.
I am a U.S. citizen and I am not willing to have such child. United States does have US military to ensure U.S. government's determination to keep United States a lawful country.
Somebody want my money, in millions or in billions, can spend like 100,000 or so in US Dollar or in Chinese RMB to buy an egg to produce an anchor child. If you heard this rumor, can you imagine that can be from a person that is alright in brain department? Where can they get this egg to be so powerful? You heard this morning how some Chinese said he can decide so? I do not have any egg in China.
I have been a U.S. resident for over 21 years already and you have heard that pregnancy children announcement was from a well reputed lab by a well reputed DNA expert, a DNA expert not only great in DNA technology but also respect that who intend to be the parents to produce their own biological child(children) lawfully through DNA technology have to be lawful mutually from both intended father and intended mother.
*There was an episode mentioned a DNA researcher used better eggs to produce his children through his wife's belly. The eggs he used, I assume, were donated for DNA research purpose or his female friend's.
----Oct. 20th, 2017
听说了今天早上的Pejoves基金的说法。
我的回应：这个基金是由Pejoves家里代理了大约200年左右。我是通过继承这个英国基金而继承了这个英国基金的美国子基金。这个英国基金还有一个非英国的上级基金。我拥有这家英国基金的美国子基金，我也拥有这家英国基金。
*我现在会使用拥有人来强调我自己，现在的“文宣”是在宣传“基金的投资人并不一定拥有基金，所以花了基金的钱，就算不是经营支出，都不是在花我的钱”。我必须强调我是100%的完全拥有我所继承的所有基金的全部，我这么说是100%的合法。任何非经营支出都是在花我的钱。
----2017年10月20日。
听说了”准备花个100“的说法。
我的回应：不知道是谁说的，我是真实的继承人没有任何理由需要担心。知道那个基金历史的人都知道我是唯一的一个，没有任何混淆不清的。
我就说啊，为什么有人会愿意花钱啊，就算那100后面的单位是中国人民币的分或者是英国的便士，为什么要花啊, 如果是合法拥有的财产，在美国或者在英国报警求助及警方的警力调查保护都是一分钱也不需要花的， 英美911报警电话是免费的，英美警方的网路报警也是免费。
当我是否拥有我所继承的基金，及我是否是有职业成就的女性已经成了公众疑问之时，我就是走进了一个警察局第一次拨打了联邦调查局的报警求助电话。当时是智能手机普天盖地到处都有，我却被人叫成讨饭的必须做一份苦力工挣口饭吃，还是只够资格去做餐馆工做些捡垃圾的活。我的投诉就是广播剧从2014年对我的财务及我究竟是谁的一切宣传活动从来都不是什么”演演戏而已“。
我确实就此对Tina O'Connor为什么需要通过广播来推销谁才应该拥有那家基金做过评论。我说如果那家美国基金是他们家的美国合法财产，她为什么需要通过广播剧来推动所谓的“澄清”，或者是叫来中华人民共和国的政府帮忙？有什么可能在他们家两个爷爷就只是在基金里一共做了50年左右，却是拿了近200年的“同意供给”之后就是应该拥有这个基金？我不是在抱怨，我也没有抱怨过这个"同意供给“或者每年供给的金额（一共2亿美金一年，历史上也一直就是这个规模），但我确实是投诉Tina O'Connor凭什么就因为她自己的问题就是够资格糟践我方敏？还有其他一些O'Connor家的小姐也是和她一样。
Pejoves家也有和O'Connor家类似的故事，包括祖爷爷的一封信及“同意供给”。区别就是O'Connor家里是有两个爷爷做过基金法务部门的头头一共50年左右，丛来都不是基金总经理。Pejoves家是就只有一个爷爷做过基金法务部门的经理大概30-35年左右。我对Pejoves家的一些小姐及她们的亲朋也是类似投诉。
----2017年10月20日。
听说了今天早上的”可以和我生个只为要钱的小孩”的那个男的单方决定权。
我的回应：谁觉得够资格这么说根本就是一个变态精神病。碰到这种你就只想痛骂“你他妈的你以为你自己是谁啊”。
我是美国公民我没有这个意愿生个这样的小孩。美国是有军队可以保障美国政府誓言捍卫美国是个法制国家的决心的。
有人想要我的钱，就只要花个10万美金或者10万人民币就可以买个卵子生个小孩来要个上亿，上百亿。你要是听到这种说法，你还会认为说这种话的人脑子正常啊？他们从哪里能买到这个卵子可以如此了不起？你听到今天早上一个中国人就是这么说的？我的卵子统统不在中国。
我是美国居民都已经超过21年了，你也听到代孕所生的那些小孩是由信誉很好的实验室，信誉很好的DNA专家所宣布的，这个DNA专家不光DNA的技术好，而且尊重法律尊重必须是男女双方的共同意愿： 也就是那些想通过DNA技术来生个亲生孩子的准父母必须按照法律，按照欲做父母的男女双方的共同意愿合法进行。
*曾今有一集广播剧提到了一个DNA研究人员用了较好的卵子及他妻子的肚皮来生他自己的孩子。我估计他所用的卵子是选自做DNA实验用的捐赠卵子或者是他的一些女性朋友的。
----2017年10月20日。
Thursday, October 19, 2017
10-19-017 All these Insults are out of Hatred or out of Insanity?(所有这些言语挑衅是出于仇恨还是出于精神失常？）
10-19-017 All these Insults are out of Hatred or out of Insanity?(所有这些言语挑衅是出于仇恨还是出于精神失常？）
Heard this morning's talk about who is the father of that published child in 2012（中文附后）.
My response: I heard this morning confirmed that is a real child who resembles the beautiful me a lot.
----Oct. 19th, 2017
Heard this morning's "proposal".
My response: I repeat what I said in the morning: That is the person I never met that he can never claim that published child if she is my biological daughter.
This answer "I am not interested in you since I have never met you", I assume, would be given by any honorably, decent female who do not live on underwear relationship.
----Oct. 19th, 2017
Why a female, just being a sex partner to a male who got nothing to do with me, can feel so comfortable to arrange this?
My response: To insult, I assume, out of hatred or out of insanity.
I only acknowledged one biological daughter and one biological son, I do not know if I have more same age biological children among announced 6 pairs and I will be thrilled if I do. I did hear the announcement about one same age girl but I also heard conflicted "nothing to do at all" announcements that I should listen to, so I say I am not certain if that girl announcement is not just a joke.
This "I throw you a male's underwear" tone has been since 1989. I never met anyone that I could say I dated seriously when I was in China so that I was not really in the situation to experience this tone a lot, but if you remembered the story of how a wife can throw her husband underwear to me when I was her guest in 1995, the boss and his wife's story from Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, that was the same tone exactly like you hear on the radio this morning. This has been my experience in Chinese community in past 10-12 years. What you heard on the radio program is probably just a reflection of this, just like the tone of yesterday's episode, "I got nothing to do with Chinese woman Min Fang, so I say I need you to do this or to spend this much money as I said so", yesterday's number requested you heard was $30 Billion in U.S dollars, was the reflection of experiences from my associated since July 1st of 2004.
In 1989's meeting, I was not having a serious boyfriend that can anger anyone this way. The Shanghai Communism Youth Party guy I met in 1988 was having a sexual involved girlfriend, by rumor, in 1989 already that everybody knows him possibly already heard so that I was not considered having anything to do with him in 1989's college meeting. The military guy I was chatting in 1989 meeting with may have a girlfriend but was not in the civilian world to do so, and I never met that military guy in person for anyone need to do so.
Regarding the tone that I need to pay a woman to reward her to mother a child with a man who was implied as my own man like what was featured yesterday, I am not certain if it was since 1989, I knew for sure it was definitely since July 1st of 2004. I am certain the intention is to insult, to arouse hostility and anger, but I am not sure if that was from hatred or from insanity.
Other than these, I do not know who else and what is the reason of hatred.
----Oct. 19th, 2017
Heard the saying that I was just a homeless, a shame to my children.
My response: I also heard if you have your own big money, why not just enjoy life, enjoy the sunshine, etc..
I have to say,
I was called a homeless because I was enjoying the sunshine with all my belongings next to me;
I was called a homeless because I could lookup at stars in bed outdoor-ly;
I was called a homeless because I felt the pouring raindrops all over me that wet my shoes uncomfortably.
I was called a homeless because I watched snow flakes covered me with chilly wind piecing my warmness.
I was enjoying my life harshly because all these spots I hung around were all well-known reserved spots in 2004 to ensure bearable-ness, I was at home entire time when I was called a homeless.
Why I chose to enjoy life so? Well, that is the question I asked law's help to find out. I was not afraid of harshness because of all these arrangements to make it all bearable to me. I was cared for with my children.
BIG THANKS TO ALL.
----Oct. 19th, 2017
听说了今天早上提到谁是那个2012年发表过照片的孩子的父亲
我的回应：我听说了今天早上证实了那是一个长的很像我的，真实存在着的一个小孩。
----2017年10月19日。
听说了今天早上的“求婚”。
我的回应：我重复今天早上的所言：那个人我从未见过，如果那个照片上的孩子是我亲生小孩，我决不会让他声称那孩子和他有关。
我所给的回答“我从未见过你，我对你一点兴趣都没有” 应该是任何一个正正经经的非花痴，也不靠卖裤裆生活的良家妇女都会给的答案吧。
----2017年10月17日。
为什么一个女人，就凭她和一个与我无关的男人的裤裆关系，就可以这么想当然做这些安排？
我的回应：我估计就为言语挑衅羞辱，就是不知道是出于仇恨还是出于精神失常。
我只承认了一个亲生女儿和一个亲生儿子，我不清楚在所宣布的那6对代孕所生的孩子里面还有没有我自己亲生的孩子，要有就真的是太美了。我确实有听到还宣布过一个女孩可能是我的，但我也听到了不止一次地宣布“完全没有任何关系”这种让我觉得应该是很认真的说法，所以我不确定所谓还有一个女孩的说法是否只是个玩笑而已。
这种“我扔一条男人内裤给你”的做法从1989年就有了。我在中国的时候从未正式谈过一个男朋友，所以我自己没有什么样的经历可以说是对此感受很深，但你要是记得那个有关1995年时一个妻子扔给我她自己丈夫内裤的故事，就是南京市药检所的副所长夏顺宁和他妻子张艾华的故事，那个口气就是你今天早上广播里听到的这种腔调。这腔调也是我过去10-12年在美国华裔社区经历最多的。今天早上的广播可能也就是反映出了这些，就像昨天那集“我和那个中国女人方敏一点关系都没有，所以你按我说的来花这笔钱或做这件事”，昨天要求的那笔钱可是300亿美金，这体现的是和我相关人士们从2004年7月1日就开始的经历和体会。
在1989年开电讯会议时，我当时没有任何男友交往恋爱关系。我1988年遇见的上海共青团的那个在1989年时已有据传已经发生过两性关系的女友，很多人是他的人也都知道，所以在1989年高校会议上没人认为我和他有什么关系。那个在1989年会议上聊的挺多的解放军军人当时好像有个女友但不是地方上的，我也没见过那个军人会让任何人觉得有必要这么做。
至于昨天那集那口气，就是我需要为和一个男人生了个孩子的女人，还暗示是和我自己的男人生了个孩子的女人支付300亿美金的那个要求和理所应当的口气，我确定是从2004年7月1日就开始了。我确定这种做法就是为了言语挑衅和羞辱，挑动敌意和愤怒，就是不确定这是出于谁的仇恨还是因为有人精神失常。
除了这些，我不知道还有谁以及仇恨的原因是什么。
----2017年10月19日。
听说了我就只是个无家可归的流浪者，是我孩子们的耻辱的说法。
我的回应：我也听说了“你要是自己有大把钱，为什么不享受生活，享受晒晒太阳，等等的生活”。
我只好说啊：
我被叫成是个流浪者，就因为我晒太阳的时候，全副的家当都是随身携带着的；
我被叫成是个流浪者，就因为我躺在床上仰望星空的时候，夜夜归寝都是在户外的；
我被叫成是个流浪者，就因为我全身心感受着大雨瓢泼的时候，鞋子湿透都是很不舒服的；
我被叫成是个流浪者，就因为我看着雪花覆盖全身的时候，寒风刺骨也都是冻澈心扉的。
我是在享受着很艰苦的生活就因为我转来转去的这些地方都是众所周知在2004年就已经安排好了的，以保障我可以过的了这些艰苦的日子。流浪的那些日子里我其实每天都是在自己家里的。
为什么我选择如此这般来享受生活？这是一个我已经寻求法律的帮助来寻找的答案。就因为所有这些“让我能过的了”的安排，我一点都没有害怕过艰辛的生活。我和我的孩子们是被很好的照顾着的。
衷心感谢所有的人。
----2017年10月19日。
Heard this morning's talk about who is the father of that published child in 2012（中文附后）.
My response: I heard this morning confirmed that is a real child who resembles the beautiful me a lot.
----Oct. 19th, 2017
Heard this morning's "proposal".
My response: I repeat what I said in the morning: That is the person I never met that he can never claim that published child if she is my biological daughter.
This answer "I am not interested in you since I have never met you", I assume, would be given by any honorably, decent female who do not live on underwear relationship.
----Oct. 19th, 2017
Why a female, just being a sex partner to a male who got nothing to do with me, can feel so comfortable to arrange this?
My response: To insult, I assume, out of hatred or out of insanity.
I only acknowledged one biological daughter and one biological son, I do not know if I have more same age biological children among announced 6 pairs and I will be thrilled if I do. I did hear the announcement about one same age girl but I also heard conflicted "nothing to do at all" announcements that I should listen to, so I say I am not certain if that girl announcement is not just a joke.
This "I throw you a male's underwear" tone has been since 1989. I never met anyone that I could say I dated seriously when I was in China so that I was not really in the situation to experience this tone a lot, but if you remembered the story of how a wife can throw her husband underwear to me when I was her guest in 1995, the boss and his wife's story from Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, that was the same tone exactly like you hear on the radio this morning. This has been my experience in Chinese community in past 10-12 years. What you heard on the radio program is probably just a reflection of this, just like the tone of yesterday's episode, "I got nothing to do with Chinese woman Min Fang, so I say I need you to do this or to spend this much money as I said so", yesterday's number requested you heard was $30 Billion in U.S dollars, was the reflection of experiences from my associated since July 1st of 2004.
In 1989's meeting, I was not having a serious boyfriend that can anger anyone this way. The Shanghai Communism Youth Party guy I met in 1988 was having a sexual involved girlfriend, by rumor, in 1989 already that everybody knows him possibly already heard so that I was not considered having anything to do with him in 1989's college meeting. The military guy I was chatting in 1989 meeting with may have a girlfriend but was not in the civilian world to do so, and I never met that military guy in person for anyone need to do so.
Regarding the tone that I need to pay a woman to reward her to mother a child with a man who was implied as my own man like what was featured yesterday, I am not certain if it was since 1989, I knew for sure it was definitely since July 1st of 2004. I am certain the intention is to insult, to arouse hostility and anger, but I am not sure if that was from hatred or from insanity.
Other than these, I do not know who else and what is the reason of hatred.
----Oct. 19th, 2017
Heard the saying that I was just a homeless, a shame to my children.
My response: I also heard if you have your own big money, why not just enjoy life, enjoy the sunshine, etc..
I have to say,
I was called a homeless because I was enjoying the sunshine with all my belongings next to me;
I was called a homeless because I could lookup at stars in bed outdoor-ly;
I was called a homeless because I felt the pouring raindrops all over me that wet my shoes uncomfortably.
I was called a homeless because I watched snow flakes covered me with chilly wind piecing my warmness.
I was enjoying my life harshly because all these spots I hung around were all well-known reserved spots in 2004 to ensure bearable-ness, I was at home entire time when I was called a homeless.
Why I chose to enjoy life so? Well, that is the question I asked law's help to find out. I was not afraid of harshness because of all these arrangements to make it all bearable to me. I was cared for with my children.
BIG THANKS TO ALL.
----Oct. 19th, 2017
听说了今天早上提到谁是那个2012年发表过照片的孩子的父亲
我的回应：我听说了今天早上证实了那是一个长的很像我的，真实存在着的一个小孩。
----2017年10月19日。
听说了今天早上的“求婚”。
我的回应：我重复今天早上的所言：那个人我从未见过，如果那个照片上的孩子是我亲生小孩，我决不会让他声称那孩子和他有关。
我所给的回答“我从未见过你，我对你一点兴趣都没有” 应该是任何一个正正经经的非花痴，也不靠卖裤裆生活的良家妇女都会给的答案吧。
----2017年10月17日。
为什么一个女人，就凭她和一个与我无关的男人的裤裆关系，就可以这么想当然做这些安排？
我的回应：我估计就为言语挑衅羞辱，就是不知道是出于仇恨还是出于精神失常。
我只承认了一个亲生女儿和一个亲生儿子，我不清楚在所宣布的那6对代孕所生的孩子里面还有没有我自己亲生的孩子，要有就真的是太美了。我确实有听到还宣布过一个女孩可能是我的，但我也听到了不止一次地宣布“完全没有任何关系”这种让我觉得应该是很认真的说法，所以我不确定所谓还有一个女孩的说法是否只是个玩笑而已。
这种“我扔一条男人内裤给你”的做法从1989年就有了。我在中国的时候从未正式谈过一个男朋友，所以我自己没有什么样的经历可以说是对此感受很深，但你要是记得那个有关1995年时一个妻子扔给我她自己丈夫内裤的故事，就是南京市药检所的副所长夏顺宁和他妻子张艾华的故事，那个口气就是你今天早上广播里听到的这种腔调。这腔调也是我过去10-12年在美国华裔社区经历最多的。今天早上的广播可能也就是反映出了这些，就像昨天那集“我和那个中国女人方敏一点关系都没有，所以你按我说的来花这笔钱或做这件事”，昨天要求的那笔钱可是300亿美金，这体现的是和我相关人士们从2004年7月1日就开始的经历和体会。
在1989年开电讯会议时，我当时没有任何男友交往恋爱关系。我1988年遇见的上海共青团的那个在1989年时已有据传已经发生过两性关系的女友，很多人是他的人也都知道，所以在1989年高校会议上没人认为我和他有什么关系。那个在1989年会议上聊的挺多的解放军军人当时好像有个女友但不是地方上的，我也没见过那个军人会让任何人觉得有必要这么做。
至于昨天那集那口气，就是我需要为和一个男人生了个孩子的女人，还暗示是和我自己的男人生了个孩子的女人支付300亿美金的那个要求和理所应当的口气，我确定是从2004年7月1日就开始了。我确定这种做法就是为了言语挑衅和羞辱，挑动敌意和愤怒，就是不确定这是出于谁的仇恨还是因为有人精神失常。
除了这些，我不知道还有谁以及仇恨的原因是什么。
----2017年10月19日。
听说了我就只是个无家可归的流浪者，是我孩子们的耻辱的说法。
我的回应：我也听说了“你要是自己有大把钱，为什么不享受生活，享受晒晒太阳，等等的生活”。
我只好说啊：
我被叫成是个流浪者，就因为我晒太阳的时候，全副的家当都是随身携带着的；
我被叫成是个流浪者，就因为我躺在床上仰望星空的时候，夜夜归寝都是在户外的；
我被叫成是个流浪者，就因为我全身心感受着大雨瓢泼的时候，鞋子湿透都是很不舒服的；
我被叫成是个流浪者，就因为我看着雪花覆盖全身的时候，寒风刺骨也都是冻澈心扉的。
我是在享受着很艰苦的生活就因为我转来转去的这些地方都是众所周知在2004年就已经安排好了的，以保障我可以过的了这些艰苦的日子。流浪的那些日子里我其实每天都是在自己家里的。
为什么我选择如此这般来享受生活？这是一个我已经寻求法律的帮助来寻找的答案。就因为所有这些“让我能过的了”的安排，我一点都没有害怕过艰辛的生活。我和我的孩子们是被很好的照顾着的。
衷心感谢所有的人。
----2017年10月19日。
Wednesday, October 18, 2017
10-18-2017 I was never cheap even when I was on a visitor's visa
10-18-2017 I was never cheap even when I was on a visitor's visa
Heard the saying Why Jessica, the announced wife of David Petraeus, can take my $3 Billion private money?
My response: Not by U.S. laws. Not by my willingness. Being who they are, the so super richest as they are so proud of, I understand they are just trying to hold all my cash to watch me file bankruptcy in my personal life that may include my dear life as well, and I sue them for everything that is applicable. I am protected by U.S. laws.
----Oct. 18th, 2017
Heard this was borrowed from Lehman Brothers' story.
My response: There is so much more had been done beyond Lehman Brothers' story. You have already heard murder attempt investigation on the radio, that was never a joke.
----Oct. 18th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of my swearings in Chinese.
My response: I translate it into English here:
If you are indeed Chinese government official, you are the mother fuck whore born. Who the fuck do you think you are? You want to go suck that Hispanic's asshole, you go ahead, but don't ever fancy your asshole sucker mouth can have a penny of my money. Who the fuck you think you are, you are just a asshole sucker not even have the chance to suck her pussy, don't ever fancy your disgusting asshole sucking mouth can talk about my money.
I am adding more here:
If you already sucked her pussy, like that accountant already did, you go pay your sucking by your own money, I said the same thing to that accountant who is so aware that asshole born has nothing to do with me, if that accountant is not willing to pay by his own money because his lips is not good enough to father that asshole's born, I have to tell that accountant that, between that accountant and me, that disgusting Hispanic female's disgusting asshole is only that accountant's willingness to suck. Go suck her if that accountant is willing, but don't ever fancy that can be my spending.
----Oct. 18th, 2017
Heard Chinese government trash me because they thought I am just a shabby new immigrant in U.S..
My response: That was the reason I applied U.S. citizenship in January of 2015. I do get the "teaching" that this term of People's Republic of China government do not serve the people but busy serving butts and breasts only.
I am proud to be an American, a U.S. citizen.
My family background is real, my inherited wealth is real, my hard earned intellectual achievements are all real. I was never cheap in United States even when I was a new arrival on a visitor's visa.
I am not the person can be so easily victimized to have some computer-made child's video published to make me childless or that is just a trashed mistress' child, I was never that cheap and my children were never that cheap or illegitimate. We were never in that situation. I am the comfortable mother currently do not live with my children because I know they are being taken good care of.
----Oct. 18th, 2017
Heard the saying Why Jessica, the announced wife of David Petraeus, can take my $3 Billion private money?
My response: Not by U.S. laws. Not by my willingness. Being who they are, the so super richest as they are so proud of, I understand they are just trying to hold all my cash to watch me file bankruptcy in my personal life that may include my dear life as well, and I sue them for everything that is applicable. I am protected by U.S. laws.
----Oct. 18th, 2017
Heard this was borrowed from Lehman Brothers' story.
My response: There is so much more had been done beyond Lehman Brothers' story. You have already heard murder attempt investigation on the radio, that was never a joke.
----Oct. 18th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of my swearings in Chinese.
My response: I translate it into English here:
If you are indeed Chinese government official, you are the mother fuck whore born. Who the fuck do you think you are? You want to go suck that Hispanic's asshole, you go ahead, but don't ever fancy your asshole sucker mouth can have a penny of my money. Who the fuck you think you are, you are just a asshole sucker not even have the chance to suck her pussy, don't ever fancy your disgusting asshole sucking mouth can talk about my money.
I am adding more here:
If you already sucked her pussy, like that accountant already did, you go pay your sucking by your own money, I said the same thing to that accountant who is so aware that asshole born has nothing to do with me, if that accountant is not willing to pay by his own money because his lips is not good enough to father that asshole's born, I have to tell that accountant that, between that accountant and me, that disgusting Hispanic female's disgusting asshole is only that accountant's willingness to suck. Go suck her if that accountant is willing, but don't ever fancy that can be my spending.
----Oct. 18th, 2017
Heard Chinese government trash me because they thought I am just a shabby new immigrant in U.S..
My response: That was the reason I applied U.S. citizenship in January of 2015. I do get the "teaching" that this term of People's Republic of China government do not serve the people but busy serving butts and breasts only.
I am proud to be an American, a U.S. citizen.
My family background is real, my inherited wealth is real, my hard earned intellectual achievements are all real. I was never cheap in United States even when I was a new arrival on a visitor's visa.
I am not the person can be so easily victimized to have some computer-made child's video published to make me childless or that is just a trashed mistress' child, I was never that cheap and my children were never that cheap or illegitimate. We were never in that situation. I am the comfortable mother currently do not live with my children because I know they are being taken good care of.
----Oct. 18th, 2017
Tuesday, October 17, 2017
10-17-2017 Only My Heir （Min Fang's Heir) is ancient Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong's Heir (只有我方敏的继承人才是唐太宗李世民的继承人）
10-17-2017 Only My Heir (Min Fang's Heir) is ancient Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong's Heir (只有我方敏的继承人才是唐太宗李世民的继承人）
Heard this morning's talk about father of my own ancient Chinese Emperor grandfather's (我爷爷唐太宗） heir.
My response: I am the heir of this ancient Chinese Emperor（唐太宗李世民）. I do not have any child seeded by People's Republic of China's Premiere Li Keqiang ( or spelling as Li, Kejiang) and there won't be any such child. I won't tolerate Chinese Premier Li's lie about his own children's blood as if associate with me. I won't tolerate Chinese Premiere Li lie to imply as he has or he will have a child with me.
----Oct. 17th, 2017
Important Announcements:
My inherited titles and wealth from my own birth grandfathers are all private owned by myself even in 2004 when I was still a Chinese citizen,.
My own hard reward from my intellectual contribution including money and acknowledged achievements are all private owned by myself even in 2004 when I was a Chinese citizen,.
The title of the father of my heir is the same title of the father of Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong Li‘s (唐太宗李世民） heir. This is the privately owned title that I am the only person can only I can authorize the privilege.
I am a U.S citizen since June of 2015 that I am proud to be. My freedom in marriage and my lawful ownership of what I inherited and what I earned are all protected by U.S. laws.
I am proud of my own grandfathers heir who is capable to look after what they want me to keep.
I am proud to be the ancient Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong Li's (唐太宗李世民）heir who carries his blood, his heir birth mark and his looks with hard build my own name Min Fang.
----Oct. 17th, 2017.
听说了今天早上谈到了谁是我爷爷唐太宗李世民继承人的父亲。
我的回应：我方敏是我爷爷唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人。我和中国李姓总理没有任何小孩，今后我也永远不会与中国李克强总理有任何小孩。我永远都不允许中华人民共和国的李克强总理就他自己孩子的血脉撒谎造成他的小孩似乎和我有关的假象。我永远都不会允许中国李克强总理撒谎好像他和我有小孩或者是会有小孩。
----2017年10月17日。
重要声明：
就算我在2004年时还是中华人民共和国的公民， 我所继承的财产及所有头衔全部都是属于我方敏自己私人拥有。
就算我在2004年时还是中华人民共和国的公民，我自己勤奋努力挣来的智慧产权收入包括金钱和名誉全部都属于我方敏私人拥有。
我方敏继承人孩子的父亲就是唐太宗李世民继承人孩子的父亲。这是一个私人拥有的头衔称谓只有我方敏有权决定谁有资格。
我很骄傲从2015年6月起我已经是美国公民。我方敏的婚姻自由以及我方敏的私人合法财产包括我方敏所继承的及我方敏自己辛苦所挣得都受到美国法律的保护。
我很骄傲我是我自己爷爷们的继承人有能力可以守护他们留给我让我拥有的东西。
我方敏很骄傲我是唐太宗李世民的继承人，我拥有他的血，拥有他的继承人掌纹，拥有他的长相，我还拥有我自己勤奋成就的我自己的名字方敏。
----2017年10月17日。
Heard this morning's talk about father of my own ancient Chinese Emperor grandfather's (我爷爷唐太宗） heir.
My response: I am the heir of this ancient Chinese Emperor（唐太宗李世民）. I do not have any child seeded by People's Republic of China's Premiere Li Keqiang ( or spelling as Li, Kejiang) and there won't be any such child. I won't tolerate Chinese Premier Li's lie about his own children's blood as if associate with me. I won't tolerate Chinese Premiere Li lie to imply as he has or he will have a child with me.
----Oct. 17th, 2017
Important Announcements:
My inherited titles and wealth from my own birth grandfathers are all private owned by myself even in 2004 when I was still a Chinese citizen,.
My own hard reward from my intellectual contribution including money and acknowledged achievements are all private owned by myself even in 2004 when I was a Chinese citizen,.
The title of the father of my heir is the same title of the father of Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong Li‘s (唐太宗李世民） heir. This is the privately owned title that I am the only person can only I can authorize the privilege.
I am a U.S citizen since June of 2015 that I am proud to be. My freedom in marriage and my lawful ownership of what I inherited and what I earned are all protected by U.S. laws.
I am proud of my own grandfathers heir who is capable to look after what they want me to keep.
I am proud to be the ancient Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong Li's (唐太宗李世民）heir who carries his blood, his heir birth mark and his looks with hard build my own name Min Fang.
----Oct. 17th, 2017.
听说了今天早上谈到了谁是我爷爷唐太宗李世民继承人的父亲。
我的回应：我方敏是我爷爷唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人。我和中国李姓总理没有任何小孩，今后我也永远不会与中国李克强总理有任何小孩。我永远都不允许中华人民共和国的李克强总理就他自己孩子的血脉撒谎造成他的小孩似乎和我有关的假象。我永远都不会允许中国李克强总理撒谎好像他和我有小孩或者是会有小孩。
----2017年10月17日。
重要声明：
就算我在2004年时还是中华人民共和国的公民， 我所继承的财产及所有头衔全部都是属于我方敏自己私人拥有。
就算我在2004年时还是中华人民共和国的公民，我自己勤奋努力挣来的智慧产权收入包括金钱和名誉全部都属于我方敏私人拥有。
我方敏继承人孩子的父亲就是唐太宗李世民继承人孩子的父亲。这是一个私人拥有的头衔称谓只有我方敏有权决定谁有资格。
我很骄傲从2015年6月起我已经是美国公民。我方敏的婚姻自由以及我方敏的私人合法财产包括我方敏所继承的及我方敏自己辛苦所挣得都受到美国法律的保护。
我很骄傲我是我自己爷爷们的继承人有能力可以守护他们留给我让我拥有的东西。
我方敏很骄傲我是唐太宗李世民的继承人，我拥有他的血，拥有他的继承人掌纹，拥有他的长相，我还拥有我自己勤奋成就的我自己的名字方敏。
----2017年10月17日。
Monday, October 16, 2017
10-16-2017 I leave "Murder Attempt" to Investigation（是否“企图谋杀”由侦办调查来说了）
10-16-2017 I leave "Murder Attempt" to Investigation（是否“企图谋杀”由侦办调查来说了）
Heard this morning's talk of radio program's "Murder Attempt".
My response: Being a scientific engineer, I am a person listen to factual truth. I did call law enforcement's help, I leave all to investigation.
I do appreciate all the efforts of rooting out the problems.
BIG THANKS to everyone who has protected me and helped to protect me.
---Oct. 16th, 2017
听说了今天早上谈到广播剧根本是在“企图谋杀”。
我的回应: 作为一个以科学为依据的工程师，我是一个认知事实真相的人。我确实有报警，我就一切交给警方的侦办调查了。
我很感谢所有探究问题原因的努力。
衷心感谢所有那些保护了我安全，及所有那些帮助保护了我安全的每一个人。
----2017年10月16日。
Heard this morning's talk of radio program's "Murder Attempt".
My response: Being a scientific engineer, I am a person listen to factual truth. I did call law enforcement's help, I leave all to investigation.
I do appreciate all the efforts of rooting out the problems.
BIG THANKS to everyone who has protected me and helped to protect me.
---Oct. 16th, 2017
听说了今天早上谈到广播剧根本是在“企图谋杀”。
我的回应: 作为一个以科学为依据的工程师，我是一个认知事实真相的人。我确实有报警，我就一切交给警方的侦办调查了。
我很感谢所有探究问题原因的努力。
衷心感谢所有那些保护了我安全，及所有那些帮助保护了我安全的每一个人。
----2017年10月16日。
Saturday, October 14, 2017
10-14-2017 Who is The Better Child from The Famous Ancestors we share (谁才是我显赫家祖我们共同祖先的优秀孩子）
10-14-2017 Who is The Better Child from The Famous Ancestors we share (谁才是我显赫家祖我们共同祖先的优秀孩子）
Heard this morning's broadcast of fourth cousin saying（中文附后）.
My response: My family are known now for 2000 years polygamist family history. None of my grandfathers had any mistress or illegitimate children. They were never in such situation that they could not marry a woman.
Historically, all my grandfathers wives were daughters from very decent families, my non-Emperors' grandfathers' "privilege" was next generation heir of this long history family had not born yet, and only daughters from very decent families were eligible to mother a heir. My grandfathers only started to negotiate a new marriage when all the wives could not bear any more child.
My great grandfather was born by his father's youngest wife. He had two wives himself. His first wife was infertile and all his children were from his second wife who I call my great grandmother. Both my grandfather and my father were first born and they both have one-wife marriage. My father only father me and my younger brother. Since I am the heir and his first born, my father was like his grandfather and my grandfather who have no "privilege" to marry more decent daughters to mother a heir. My father and my grandfather both in love with the other of their children who I can my mother and my great grandmother, and my grandfather's prime time was WWII and Chinese Civil War time that they all never had any mistress who mother any child or children from them.
My family's long wealthy Imperial history, of course, had long history of family disputes about wealth and historical titles, and plus the struggles of those children from decent mothers who were not the first wives. Those children's struggles were their mothers struggles, the same.
Every generation, after the senior's death and family inheriting, most of those children chose to move out with their mothers to far, far away places, some of them may also have changed their last name before or during Chinese Civil War time. Each of these non-heir sons had a non-heir share of inheritance from the senior. My inheritances from my great grandfathers are all the same as non-heir share, I am the mysterious "plus one" non-heir son in each generation's family inheriting disputes.
I got some extra-s from some grandfathers because of some extraordinary situation to re-allocate family wealth to the "future female heir ( that is me)" instead of their heir sons (my next generation grandfathers). I am this generation heir and I may have inherited my this generation heir's share from my grandfather (my father's father) directly due to some situation.
I do not have any first or second cousin unknown or in different last name, but I may have some third cousins or fourth cousins, etc. who may not even have the same last name.
----Oct. 14th, 2017
Heard this morning's struggles of who is the better child of my famous ancestors we share.
My response: This is the struggle that has the same long history as my family history.
Being a mother myself, I do have the understanding that my famous ancestors we share must be very proud of all of their great children.
Being the person having my own name built, I do share the belief that I am being my ancestors proud because of my own achievements.
Birthmark made me the privileged heir of my own ancestors according to my own ancestors inheriting rule. Birthmark does not make me a better child is a true statement, but my own hard earned achievements do make me my own ancestors proud.
I inherited my own grandfathers titles and entrusted wealth was according to my own grandfathers' own wills. Other than these family inheritances and my ancestors' heir title, those other great children from my famous ancestors that we share certainly can be our ancestors proud by their own achievements if their blood are clearly from my ancestors.
----Oct. 14th, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播提到了“我的四等亲”说法。
我的回应：我家是有2000年一夫多妻历史的家庭。我所有的爷爷们都没有情妇或者私生子。他们从来都是要有女人就是可以娶进门的。
历史上，我所有爷爷们的所有妻子都是非常体面人家的女儿，我那些没当皇帝的爷爷们可以有如此的”特殊待遇”就是因为他们有个很好的“借口”：下一代的继承人还没生出来，只有很好很体面人家的女儿才够资格做这个有着显赫家世的家庭继承人的母亲。我的爷爷们都是只在已经娶进门的那些妻子们已经没有可能再生育的情况下才会考虑再娶年轻的。
我的曾祖父是他父亲最年轻的一个妻子生的。他自己只有两个妻子，他的第一个妻子不生育，他所有的孩子都是出自他的第二个妻子，也就是我的曾祖母。我的祖父和我的父亲都是他们父亲的第一个孩子，他们两个也都是一妻婚姻。我的父亲就只生了我和我的弟弟。因为我是继承人，又是第一胎，所以我父亲就和他自己父亲一样，没有了再娶几个妻子的借口。我的父亲和我的曾祖父都是很爱我的母亲和我的曾祖母，我的爷爷年轻时正好是第二次世界大战及中国内战期间，所以他们都没有什么情妇或者私生子。
我富裕及帝王背景的家世有多久，当然家里的分家纠纷的历史也就有多长了。家里的财产，可继承的头衔，再加上那些很好人家的女儿所生的孩子们因为不是第一个妻子所出而产生的纠结。这些孩子们的母亲也是同样的纠结。（*我们家从来都没有大房，几房之类的说法。因为每一代的继承人自己的母亲也都很在意，所以我们家自古就只有第一个，第二个妻子的说法，从来没有大房，小房的说法）
每一代，当老人去世及家里财产分配过后，很多这样的孩子都选择和他们的母亲一起搬去很远的地方，有些还在中国内战之前，或者内战期间就改了姓。每一个这样的非继承人儿子在分家时都有一份“非继承人的份额”财产。我的曾祖父们给我的信托都是比照这个“非继承人的份额”，我方敏就是那个在每一次分家时都会神秘出现在“非继承人儿子名单上的”而引发家里争执的“多出来的不知在哪儿的那一个”。
我有一些祖父们额外又给了我一些是因为家里有些情况需要转移财产就把家里应该给下一代继承人儿子(就是我下一代的爷爷）的财产信托给了“还没生出来的女继承人（也就是我了）”。我作为这一代的继承人，我可能是从我祖父（我父亲的父亲）那儿因为一些原因而直接继承了我这一代的继承人份额。
我所有的第一第二等亲都很清楚，但我可能会有一些三等亲，四等亲以上的堂兄弟和我不是同一个姓氏。
----2017年10月14日。
听说了今天早上争执的“谁才是我的显赫家祖我们共同祖先的优秀孩子”。
我的回应：这一份纠结和我们家的历史是一样的长了。
我自己作为一个母亲，我很理解我的显赫家祖我们共同的祖先一定非常骄傲他们的每一个优秀的子女。
我自己作为靠自己努力成就了我自己名字的方敏，我很相信我是我祖宗们的骄傲是因为我有自己的成就。
掌纹胎记让我成了很辛运的这么显赫家世的继承人，这只是遵循了家里的继承规则。“胎记并没有让我成为我祖宗们更优秀的孩子”是一句实话，但我自己的成就确实是让我成了我祖宗们的骄傲。
我是按照我自己爷爷们的遗嘱继承了我爷爷们的称号和我爷爷们信托的财产。除了没有这些及我爷爷们的继承人称号外，我的家祖我们共同祖先的其他那些优秀的孩子们，只要他们的血脉非常明确是出自我的爷爷们，他们的成就是我们显赫爷爷们的骄傲。
----2017年10月14日。
Heard this morning's broadcast of fourth cousin saying（中文附后）.
My response: My family are known now for 2000 years polygamist family history. None of my grandfathers had any mistress or illegitimate children. They were never in such situation that they could not marry a woman.
Historically, all my grandfathers wives were daughters from very decent families, my non-Emperors' grandfathers' "privilege" was next generation heir of this long history family had not born yet, and only daughters from very decent families were eligible to mother a heir. My grandfathers only started to negotiate a new marriage when all the wives could not bear any more child.
My great grandfather was born by his father's youngest wife. He had two wives himself. His first wife was infertile and all his children were from his second wife who I call my great grandmother. Both my grandfather and my father were first born and they both have one-wife marriage. My father only father me and my younger brother. Since I am the heir and his first born, my father was like his grandfather and my grandfather who have no "privilege" to marry more decent daughters to mother a heir. My father and my grandfather both in love with the other of their children who I can my mother and my great grandmother, and my grandfather's prime time was WWII and Chinese Civil War time that they all never had any mistress who mother any child or children from them.
My family's long wealthy Imperial history, of course, had long history of family disputes about wealth and historical titles, and plus the struggles of those children from decent mothers who were not the first wives. Those children's struggles were their mothers struggles, the same.
Every generation, after the senior's death and family inheriting, most of those children chose to move out with their mothers to far, far away places, some of them may also have changed their last name before or during Chinese Civil War time. Each of these non-heir sons had a non-heir share of inheritance from the senior. My inheritances from my great grandfathers are all the same as non-heir share, I am the mysterious "plus one" non-heir son in each generation's family inheriting disputes.
I got some extra-s from some grandfathers because of some extraordinary situation to re-allocate family wealth to the "future female heir ( that is me)" instead of their heir sons (my next generation grandfathers). I am this generation heir and I may have inherited my this generation heir's share from my grandfather (my father's father) directly due to some situation.
I do not have any first or second cousin unknown or in different last name, but I may have some third cousins or fourth cousins, etc. who may not even have the same last name.
----Oct. 14th, 2017
Heard this morning's struggles of who is the better child of my famous ancestors we share.
My response: This is the struggle that has the same long history as my family history.
Being a mother myself, I do have the understanding that my famous ancestors we share must be very proud of all of their great children.
Being the person having my own name built, I do share the belief that I am being my ancestors proud because of my own achievements.
Birthmark made me the privileged heir of my own ancestors according to my own ancestors inheriting rule. Birthmark does not make me a better child is a true statement, but my own hard earned achievements do make me my own ancestors proud.
I inherited my own grandfathers titles and entrusted wealth was according to my own grandfathers' own wills. Other than these family inheritances and my ancestors' heir title, those other great children from my famous ancestors that we share certainly can be our ancestors proud by their own achievements if their blood are clearly from my ancestors.
----Oct. 14th, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播提到了“我的四等亲”说法。
我的回应：我家是有2000年一夫多妻历史的家庭。我所有的爷爷们都没有情妇或者私生子。他们从来都是要有女人就是可以娶进门的。
历史上，我所有爷爷们的所有妻子都是非常体面人家的女儿，我那些没当皇帝的爷爷们可以有如此的”特殊待遇”就是因为他们有个很好的“借口”：下一代的继承人还没生出来，只有很好很体面人家的女儿才够资格做这个有着显赫家世的家庭继承人的母亲。我的爷爷们都是只在已经娶进门的那些妻子们已经没有可能再生育的情况下才会考虑再娶年轻的。
我的曾祖父是他父亲最年轻的一个妻子生的。他自己只有两个妻子，他的第一个妻子不生育，他所有的孩子都是出自他的第二个妻子，也就是我的曾祖母。我的祖父和我的父亲都是他们父亲的第一个孩子，他们两个也都是一妻婚姻。我的父亲就只生了我和我的弟弟。因为我是继承人，又是第一胎，所以我父亲就和他自己父亲一样，没有了再娶几个妻子的借口。我的父亲和我的曾祖父都是很爱我的母亲和我的曾祖母，我的爷爷年轻时正好是第二次世界大战及中国内战期间，所以他们都没有什么情妇或者私生子。
我富裕及帝王背景的家世有多久，当然家里的分家纠纷的历史也就有多长了。家里的财产，可继承的头衔，再加上那些很好人家的女儿所生的孩子们因为不是第一个妻子所出而产生的纠结。这些孩子们的母亲也是同样的纠结。（*我们家从来都没有大房，几房之类的说法。因为每一代的继承人自己的母亲也都很在意，所以我们家自古就只有第一个，第二个妻子的说法，从来没有大房，小房的说法）
每一代，当老人去世及家里财产分配过后，很多这样的孩子都选择和他们的母亲一起搬去很远的地方，有些还在中国内战之前，或者内战期间就改了姓。每一个这样的非继承人儿子在分家时都有一份“非继承人的份额”财产。我的曾祖父们给我的信托都是比照这个“非继承人的份额”，我方敏就是那个在每一次分家时都会神秘出现在“非继承人儿子名单上的”而引发家里争执的“多出来的不知在哪儿的那一个”。
我有一些祖父们额外又给了我一些是因为家里有些情况需要转移财产就把家里应该给下一代继承人儿子(就是我下一代的爷爷）的财产信托给了“还没生出来的女继承人（也就是我了）”。我作为这一代的继承人，我可能是从我祖父（我父亲的父亲）那儿因为一些原因而直接继承了我这一代的继承人份额。
我所有的第一第二等亲都很清楚，但我可能会有一些三等亲，四等亲以上的堂兄弟和我不是同一个姓氏。
----2017年10月14日。
听说了今天早上争执的“谁才是我的显赫家祖我们共同祖先的优秀孩子”。
我的回应：这一份纠结和我们家的历史是一样的长了。
我自己作为一个母亲，我很理解我的显赫家祖我们共同的祖先一定非常骄傲他们的每一个优秀的子女。
我自己作为靠自己努力成就了我自己名字的方敏，我很相信我是我祖宗们的骄傲是因为我有自己的成就。
掌纹胎记让我成了很辛运的这么显赫家世的继承人，这只是遵循了家里的继承规则。“胎记并没有让我成为我祖宗们更优秀的孩子”是一句实话，但我自己的成就确实是让我成了我祖宗们的骄傲。
我是按照我自己爷爷们的遗嘱继承了我爷爷们的称号和我爷爷们信托的财产。除了没有这些及我爷爷们的继承人称号外，我的家祖我们共同祖先的其他那些优秀的孩子们，只要他们的血脉非常明确是出自我的爷爷们，他们的成就是我们显赫爷爷们的骄傲。
----2017年10月14日。
Thursday, October 12, 2017
10-12-2017 My Ningbo Fang's House and China's College Education （我的宁波方家和中国的大学教育）
10-12-2017 Ningbo Fang's House and China's College Education （宁波方家和中国的大学教育）
Big Thanks to everyone who helped to broadcast this morning's clarification.
----Oct. 12th, 2017
Heard this morning confirmed I am the Head Missy of Famous Ningbo Fang's House（中文附后）.
My response: I am happy I am heading the house that confirmed this morning that supported to have China's College Education when China mainland was governed by Republic of China's governement . I am happy I am one of the three generation that supported China's College Education before I was even born. Mine was donated from my entrusts that my grandfathers entrusted in China.
----Oct. 12th, 2017
Heard the question why Mr. Yiren Rong's name was mentioned?
My response: I heard some donations were handled by him or his father. My great great grandfather and his young age son, my great grandfather, were the other two generations.
If there have been any confusion about how Mr. Rong handled the donation, I say:" Well, my great-great-grandfather was there fully aware of the entire donating process. If my great-great-grandfather had any concern regarding Mr. Rong's personal income as financial manager that impacted from investment size change after the donation, it would be certainly from my great-great-grandfather's own decision and by his own arrangement. My entrusts were entrusted by my grandfathers who were also his father and his grandfathers, the entrusts were setup for the heir girl (me) who would be born to be his granddaughter carry his blood."
----Oct. 12th, 2017
My great-great-grandfather did not make arrangement about my entrusts. I do not and I would not have any Chinese seeded child or children. I won't tolerate anyone to handle my money in the name of "future father of my child".
In P.R.China, "donation" to tax collector is called "unexpected tax income" which fits 10% of donated amount tax incentive policy; donation to charity like Chinese Red Cross, or NGO (Non- government organization), it mean 10% of total donated amounts should be the service fee to who helped this donation.
This is the huge problem that I have with radio program's insist on to assign a possible "future father", obviously the intention is "to remove my decision power or my willingness of handling my own money".
----Oct. 12th, 2017
衷心感谢所有帮助了今天早上的广播播出的人员。
----2017年10月12日。
听说了今天早上证实了我是民国时期赫赫有名的宁波方家的当家大小姐。
我的回应：我很开心今天早上证实了我的这个宁波方家当年中华民国时期支持兴办了中国的大学教育。我很开心我还没出生就已经是当年支持了兴办中国大学教育的宁波方家三代中的一代。我的捐款是由我的爷爷们在中国为我设立的信托支付的。
----2017年10月12日。
听说了“为什么又提到了荣毅仁老先生的名字”的疑问。
我的回应：我听说有些捐款是由荣毅仁先生或者他的父亲经手的。我的曽曾祖父和他的幼子（我的曾祖父）是当年捐款的宁波方家的其他两代。
如果曾经有过一些对于荣老先生当时是如何处理捐款事宜的疑问，我的回答是：“这么说吧，我的曽曾祖父当时是全程参与捐款过程，应该很清楚当时捐款事宜。如果我的曽曾祖父很担心荣先生作为财务管理人员在捐款后的个人收入损失，那应该是出于我曽曾祖父他自己的决定由他自己处理的。替我设立信托的我的那些爷爷们也都是他的父亲和爷爷们，那些信托是为他自己的女继承人孙女（我）设立的，信托的受益人（我）将是他自己所出的，承载着他的血液的他自己的孙女。”
----2017年10月12日。
我的曽曾祖父当年没有用我的信托进行处理。我现在没有华人下种的小孩，我今后也不会有华人下种的小孩。我绝不允许任何人以我“未来小孩父亲”的名义处理我的任何财务。
在中华人民共和国，“捐款”给税务局叫做“预算外税收”，符合10%“捐款总额”作为给“捐款协助人员”奖励的政策；捐款给慈善机构像红十字会，或是“非政府组织”，捐款总额的10%是协助慈善单位收到这笔捐款的经受人员手续费。
这是我和广播剧的很大矛盾之一，就是广播剧坚持要安排一个可能的”未来父亲”，很明显目的就是要“不让我按我自己的意愿也不让我有权处理我自己的财务”。
----2017年10月12日。
Big Thanks to everyone who helped to broadcast this morning's clarification.
----Oct. 12th, 2017
Heard this morning confirmed I am the Head Missy of Famous Ningbo Fang's House（中文附后）.
My response: I am happy I am heading the house that confirmed this morning that supported to have China's College Education when China mainland was governed by Republic of China's governement . I am happy I am one of the three generation that supported China's College Education before I was even born. Mine was donated from my entrusts that my grandfathers entrusted in China.
----Oct. 12th, 2017
Heard the question why Mr. Yiren Rong's name was mentioned?
My response: I heard some donations were handled by him or his father. My great great grandfather and his young age son, my great grandfather, were the other two generations.
If there have been any confusion about how Mr. Rong handled the donation, I say:" Well, my great-great-grandfather was there fully aware of the entire donating process. If my great-great-grandfather had any concern regarding Mr. Rong's personal income as financial manager that impacted from investment size change after the donation, it would be certainly from my great-great-grandfather's own decision and by his own arrangement. My entrusts were entrusted by my grandfathers who were also his father and his grandfathers, the entrusts were setup for the heir girl (me) who would be born to be his granddaughter carry his blood."
----Oct. 12th, 2017
My great-great-grandfather did not make arrangement about my entrusts. I do not and I would not have any Chinese seeded child or children. I won't tolerate anyone to handle my money in the name of "future father of my child".
In P.R.China, "donation" to tax collector is called "unexpected tax income" which fits 10% of donated amount tax incentive policy; donation to charity like Chinese Red Cross, or NGO (Non- government organization), it mean 10% of total donated amounts should be the service fee to who helped this donation.
This is the huge problem that I have with radio program's insist on to assign a possible "future father", obviously the intention is "to remove my decision power or my willingness of handling my own money".
----Oct. 12th, 2017
----2017年10月12日。
听说了今天早上证实了我是民国时期赫赫有名的宁波方家的当家大小姐。
我的回应：我很开心今天早上证实了我的这个宁波方家当年中华民国时期支持兴办了中国的大学教育。我很开心我还没出生就已经是当年支持了兴办中国大学教育的宁波方家三代中的一代。我的捐款是由我的爷爷们在中国为我设立的信托支付的。
----2017年10月12日。
听说了“为什么又提到了荣毅仁老先生的名字”的疑问。
我的回应：我听说有些捐款是由荣毅仁先生或者他的父亲经手的。我的曽曾祖父和他的幼子（我的曾祖父）是当年捐款的宁波方家的其他两代。
如果曾经有过一些对于荣老先生当时是如何处理捐款事宜的疑问，我的回答是：“这么说吧，我的曽曾祖父当时是全程参与捐款过程，应该很清楚当时捐款事宜。如果我的曽曾祖父很担心荣先生作为财务管理人员在捐款后的个人收入损失，那应该是出于我曽曾祖父他自己的决定由他自己处理的。替我设立信托的我的那些爷爷们也都是他的父亲和爷爷们，那些信托是为他自己的女继承人孙女（我）设立的，信托的受益人（我）将是他自己所出的，承载着他的血液的他自己的孙女。”
----2017年10月12日。
我的曽曾祖父当年没有用我的信托进行处理。我现在没有华人下种的小孩，我今后也不会有华人下种的小孩。我绝不允许任何人以我“未来小孩父亲”的名义处理我的任何财务。
在中华人民共和国，“捐款”给税务局叫做“预算外税收”，符合10%“捐款总额”作为给“捐款协助人员”奖励的政策；捐款给慈善机构像红十字会，或是“非政府组织”，捐款总额的10%是协助慈善单位收到这笔捐款的经受人员手续费。
这是我和广播剧的很大矛盾之一，就是广播剧坚持要安排一个可能的”未来父亲”，很明显目的就是要“不让我按我自己的意愿也不让我有权处理我自己的财务”。
----2017年10月12日。
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
10-11-2017 I am a 3-Stars US Military General for Real
10-11-2017 I am a 3-Stars US Military General for Real
Heard this morning's confirmation of my valid 3-stars Strategist.
My response: I am thrilled that I am a 3-Stars U.S. Military General.
----Oct. 11th, 2017
Heard saying of impossible not to share my anger after reading my blog articles.
My response: Thanks for sharing my anger. Be alert if you have similar anger in your own life.
From my own experience:
Be alert if you have some anger in your own if that you can not pin exactly what that is.
1: Best is to describe your frustration in writing. A lot of times when you are trying to rationally describe your frustration, you may be able to realize what may be the reason. And do something about it.
2: If necessary, save keeping your writings. In certain situations, your frustration may need serious investigations, and if you are in these kind situations, you will need printout copies of your writings, digital copies of your writings, etc. keep easy-to-carry copies with you even you already sent to FBI to ask for help. Do this till situation start to improve.
If you are confronted by insults without any reasonable reasons, check what may be the cause. For example, you are married mother live with your husband and father of your child(ren) who comes home daily, but you are confronted that you never have a marriage. You need to check:
1: If your husband has a "office building elevator entrance white dress public wedding record" he did not aware of.
The record is a photo taken in a public place with your husband in suits and a lady in white standing next to him smiling. The record was obviously taken in a public place with a lot of "eyewitness" to be understood as public wedding marriage record.
2: If your marriage is an eye-witness marriage, you need to check what happened to eyewitness documents.
3: If your marriage is a city hall registry marriage, you probably need to check if your marriage record being impacted by computer virus, or some joking note posted internally that cause your frustration. In later case, you may need some help to check out if so.
----Oct. 11th, 2017
Tuesday, October 10, 2017
10-10-2017 Japanese Military In World War II and U.S. Military In Vietnam War (二次大战中的日本军队和越南战争中的美国军队）
10-10-2017 Japanese Military In World War II and U.S. Military In Vietnam War (二次大战中的日本军队和越南战争中的美国军队）
Head this morning's confrontation about my 3-Stars Strategist title（中文附后）.
My response: I was recruited as a U.S. Military 3-Stars Strategist because my understanding of Japanese Military outstanding performance in World War II and U.S. Military's mistake in Vietnam War. The interview was conducted at the spot of the January of 2004 meeting.
----Oct. 10th, 2017
Why Japanese Military, in my understanding, better performed than the commonly acknowledged best performed German Military in World War II?
My response: Japanese Military's "United We Face It" is the reason that there is no reserved resources or discounted carried out orders to comprise Japanese Military Strategists plans.
German Military famous for their swift actions benefited by their obviously advanced firearms and equipment.
I once read in an article that Japan went into World War II was not from Japanese Military's ambition, and Japanese Military went in because of their Generals' unsuccessful efforts to convince Japanese Government not to. In that article, it mentioned that because of that debate of not going to the war, Japanese Military was in the situation need to prove if they had been decent military stands for Japan's proud, or all its personnel should just to commit suicide to finish in shame. That is the reason that Japanese Military had this never-before "United We Face It". (*Note: To be more "appropriate", it was not "(Japanese Military )their Generals' failure to convince Japanese Government not to." per say, it was martial arts had not include verbal talent yet and military personnel had not had appropriate "debate" verbal training yet back then. It is corrected from "their Generals' failure" to "their Generals' unsuccessful efforts" ----updated on Oct. 17th, 2017)
I used several examples in January of 2004's conference:
1: Pearl Harbor. There were 3000 pilots did not divert their flights during their long trip from Japan to Pearl Harbor, not a single one diverted when they were not under valid supervision. War planes only had enough gasoline equipped to save engine power to support the long distance flight and that was the reason remaining gasoline together with the war planes were the attacking "bombs".
2: Pearl Harbor attacker pilots from Japan Air Force carried out this order was to let Japan Navy be the power in the Sea. This order was carried out without any reservedness.
Europe was in war already that British Navy or French Navy were busy of their own fights against German and Italy, Pearl Harbor attack compromised U.S. Navy force to a large degree.
Without by-passing Europe, U.S could not participate any actions against Japanese Military.
Japan was announced Alley with Germany and Italy before Pearl Harbor attack by its diplomats efforts.
3: Tons of fought in Japanese wars in Asia that Japanese Military carried out when its Navy needed to pave ways for its Army, its Air Force needed to strike to let its Navy to survive, and Japanese Army just conquer its obstacles with full forces. All these fought were carried without with all it took.
4: It had been a nightmare in Asia in World War II time, with almost entire Asia fought against Japanese Military, the small personnel numbered Japanese Military fought like this everywhere they were ordered to fight.
5: Without Nucleus bomb, Japan Military still got what it takes to continue its fights for an imaginably long enough time.
----Oct. 10th, 2017
U.S military had been in wars outside U.S several times, why Vietnam war was its pain?
My response: I am martial art fan and this had been a question since I read General McArthur's autobiography.
General McArthur was the commander of Korean War. U.S military's role in this war was similar with its role in Vietnam war, to help its Southern government to fight against its Northern Communist government. Why U.S. military was enemy like to almost every Vietnamese whenever Vietnam war was mentioned while Korean's Southern government was understood as Korean's Northerners fought against whenever Korean war was discussed.
In that book, it says General McArthur always took military actions together with Korean Southern Military which sometimes comprised results.
My puzzle about Vietnam on this was answered in January of 2004's conference that there were some reasons that U.S military often had to take actions alone in Vietnam.
I said "This was possibly the reason all these actions by U.S military alone were understood as invasion."
I said if you look into China's WWII history of its Japanese-Chinese War, you would get it that not just people in Vietnam Northern Military's uniform but every single Vietnamese would fight against U.S.military if understood as invasion. U.S. military did not get this was the reason cause U.S. military in big trouble in Vietnam.
----Oct. 10th, 2017
Heard this morning's confronts of "I had worked since 1984."
My response: What that means? Is that female a strategist or a computer programmer? I heard she is a English speaking diplomat.
I was not graduated from a Military college, I was recruited a 3-Stars U. S. Military strategist because of my understanding of Japanese Military's outstanding performance in World War II. I am the first one convinced world wide Military strategists to research on Japanese Military's performance in World War II. I am the first person to say that taking action alone caused confusion of invasion was the reason of U.S military's troubles in Vietnam wars.
Why "worked since 1984" is enough for her to confront to say if I knew Martial Arts Strategy? In China, everyone can speak Chinese but there is still college education needed to have a Chinese speaking computer programmer or a Chinese speaking martial art strategist. English speaking or Chinese speaking alone is not enough to evaluate computer knowledge or martial art strategy.
I had this nightmare like freaking out experience when I was confronted by English major college gradates that BioGate was impossibly my work. I did BioGate project in Janus Associates' office with everyone fully aware of my progress and my frustrations during the process. I am the first person done Microsoft Window's Login replacement that way in entire world. If I was not the person, then who?
There were nothing other than "BioGate was just not yours, so shut up" in English, I could not imagine what cause the statement and no further clue for me to find out what cause the confusion. This "Shut up, Shut up" only by fluent English speaking only ESL group made me can do nothing but screamed.
*ESL: Language as Second Language.
----Oct. 10th, 2017
Heard the fought between a Mrs. Rockefeller and me in July 1st of 2004 conference caused a lot of confusion.
My response: The fought was because that Mrs. Rockefeller was a micro chip producer company's administrative personnel. Her objection was toward not-stable-enough micro hardware could not be rushed to go market. I raised my voice, together with the other two computer person, when she did not get what we mean by "we work with you".
It means: We are the computer person who use those micro-hardware, we are the signal-catchers of those micro-hardware as its consumer users, we certainly can help to stable those micro-hardware by telling the producing company she works for that where we having problems as signal-catchers to help her company to find out why it was not stable.
----Oct. 10th, 2017
听说了今天早上的质疑是有关我的三星将军策略家头衔。
我的回应：我被招募为美国军队三星将军策略家是因为我对二次大战中的日本军队的卓越表现和越南战争中的美国军队所犯错误的理解。面试就是在2004年1月的会议现场.
----2017年10月10日。
在我的理解里，为什么日本军队比普遍认同的德国军队在二次大战中的表现还出色？
我的回应：日本军队“联合起来我们一起面对”是日本军队在二次打仗中无保留充分执行日本军队策略家作战计划的原因。
德国军队在二次大战中是以"闪电战"的快捷迅速闻名，这明显是得益于其精备武器及优良装备。
我曾经读过一篇文章谈到日本进入第二次世界大战不是出于日本军队的鹰派主站雄心，而是因为日本军队的将领们没能成功的向日本政府说明日本不需要打仗。那篇文章里提到了就是因为这些辩论，日本军队面临的局面是他们要么证明日本军人是日本的骄傲，要么干脆自杀谢罪算了。这是造成日本军界空前跨军种的“联合起来我们一起面对”。(*注释：准确点说吧，不是什么“日本军队的将领们没能成功的向日本政府说明日本不需要打仗”， 而是军事才华在当时还没有包括语言类才华，当时的军人们都还没有接受过恰当的“辩论”用的语言训练。
----2017年10月17日更新）
我在2004年一月的会议上用了几个例子来说明：
1：珍珠港. 3000个飞行员没有一个是在从日本到夏威夷珍珠港的漫长飞行中途改变航向的，就没有一个是在没有有效监督的情况下改变航向的。战机只载有足够汽油以节省马达运力已完成长距离飞行，所以就是用所剩的汽油和战机作为攻击用的“炸弹的”。
2： 攻击珍珠港的飞行员是日本空军的空军飞行员，执行此项作战计划就是为了让日本的海军可以称霸海上。他们执行此计划完全没有任何保留。
当时欧洲已经陷入战争，英国和法国海军都忙着他们自己和德国及意大利的战争，珍珠港事件在很大程度上严重损伤了美国海军的实力。
不绕道欧洲，美国就没有可能参与针对日本的任何军事行动。
在珍珠港事件之前，日本外交官就已经宣布日本是德国和意大利的同盟国。
3：日本在亚洲战场上的很多战争，日本军队都是如此执行作战计划, 日本海军苦战就是为了给日本陆军开道，日本空军不惜一切就是为了让日本海军可以保存实力，而日本的陆军更是勇往直前，无惧面对一切。所有这些战役都是不惜一切以达到作战目的。
4：二战中的亚洲就像是一场噩梦，整个亚洲基本上都是在和日本军队作战，而人数很少的日本军队却是在各个战场都是如此按军令顽强作战。
5: 如果不是核弹，日本军队还有实力继续打仗而且是可以打上相当一段时间，这还一点都不难想像。
----2017年10月10日。
美国军队时有在美国本土以外作战，为什么越南战争是美国军队的痛处？
我的回应：我是一个军迷，在我读过一本麦克阿瑟将军的传记后，这个问题就一直让我好奇。
麦克阿瑟将军是朝鲜战争期间的美军总指挥官。美军在朝鲜战争中的角色和在越南战争中的差不多，都是在帮着其南方政府与其北方的共产主义政府作战。为什么提到朝鲜战争，都是讲美国和南韩政府的联军在打北韩共产党军队，而提到越南战争，是讲美国军队在越南处处挨打。
那本书里提到了麦克阿瑟将军一向喜欢和南韩政府军一同行动，有时候甚至造成了军事行动的效果不理想。
我对越南战争的好奇在2004年1月的会议上得到了回答：越南战争期间有很多问题造成美国军队经常要独自采取军事行动。
我说：“美国军队所有这些独自采取的行动可能是造成了“美国军队是在入侵”这种理解的原因。
我说啊，你要是看看中国二战历史上的中日战争就知道，一旦要是被认为是入侵，不是什么只有穿着军装的北方军，而是每一个越南人都会痛打美军。美国军队没理解到这点是造成美军在越南战争中的困境原因。
----2017年10月10日。
听说了今天早上“我从1984年就开始工作了”的争执。
我的回应：这是什么意思？那个女的是个电脑程序员，还是一个策略家？我听说她是一个讲英语的外交官。
我不是从军事院校毕业的，我被招募为三星将军是因为我对二战中的日本军队卓越表现的理解。我是第一个说服了全世界的军事策略家们去研究二战中日本军队的卓越表现，我是第一个阐述美军独自采取军事行动造成入侵误解是美军陷入越南战争泥淖的原因。
为什么“从1984年就开始工作了”就已经足够资历让她来质询我懂不懂军事战争策略？在中国，每一个人都是会说中文的，可还是需要大学教育培养电脑程序员和军事策略家。光是会说中文或者是还会说英语并不具备足够专业知识来评估别人是否有电脑知识或者有军事战争策略知识。
当我被英语专业毕业的那些人质疑电脑软件Bio Gate 根本不是我做的时候，就是这种噩梦般吓死人的经历。我做这个Bio Gate软件是在Janus Associates这个公司的办公室里完成的，那儿的每个人都是亲眼看见我的每一步成就以及我的每一个纠结。我是整个世界上第一个把微软公司的视窗登陆系统给彻底换掉的，说这软件不是我做的，那能是谁做的？
除了用英语说的”Bio Gate不是你的，闭嘴“就再也没有其他了，没有任何线索究竟什么原因造成了困扰。就是这些就只是会说ESL英语而已的人，也就只有一句一句用英语说的”闭嘴，闭嘴“再无其他内容的挑衅，让我除了尖叫怒吼还是尖叫怒吼。
*ESL: 英语是第二语言(外语).
----2017年10月10日
听说了我和一个洛克菲勒夫人在2004年7月1日会议上的争执造成了一些误解。
我的回应：那个洛克菲勒夫人当时是微型硬件开发公司的办公室工作人员。她反对的是在微型硬件稳定性不过关的情况下而急于上市场的做法。在她就是弄不清我们说”我们和你们一起解决这个问题“是什么意思时，我是和另两个搞电脑的一起，扯着嗓门和她说”我们和你们一起解决这个问题“。
这话的意思是：我们搞电脑的就是这些微型硬件的使用者，我们所需要写的软件的一部分就是要扑捉这些微型硬件所传导的信号，我们当然可以作为微型硬件的用户告诉生产厂家我们在扑捉信号的过程中发生了什么问题，来协助解决微型硬件不稳定的原因。
----2017年10月10日。
Head this morning's confrontation about my 3-Stars Strategist title（中文附后）.
My response: I was recruited as a U.S. Military 3-Stars Strategist because my understanding of Japanese Military outstanding performance in World War II and U.S. Military's mistake in Vietnam War. The interview was conducted at the spot of the January of 2004 meeting.
----Oct. 10th, 2017
Why Japanese Military, in my understanding, better performed than the commonly acknowledged best performed German Military in World War II?
My response: Japanese Military's "United We Face It" is the reason that there is no reserved resources or discounted carried out orders to comprise Japanese Military Strategists plans.
German Military famous for their swift actions benefited by their obviously advanced firearms and equipment.
I once read in an article that Japan went into World War II was not from Japanese Military's ambition, and Japanese Military went in because of their Generals' unsuccessful efforts to convince Japanese Government not to. In that article, it mentioned that because of that debate of not going to the war, Japanese Military was in the situation need to prove if they had been decent military stands for Japan's proud, or all its personnel should just to commit suicide to finish in shame. That is the reason that Japanese Military had this never-before "United We Face It". (*Note: To be more "appropriate", it was not "(Japanese Military )their Generals' failure to convince Japanese Government not to." per say, it was martial arts had not include verbal talent yet and military personnel had not had appropriate "debate" verbal training yet back then. It is corrected from "their Generals' failure" to "their Generals' unsuccessful efforts" ----updated on Oct. 17th, 2017)
I used several examples in January of 2004's conference:
1: Pearl Harbor. There were 3000 pilots did not divert their flights during their long trip from Japan to Pearl Harbor, not a single one diverted when they were not under valid supervision. War planes only had enough gasoline equipped to save engine power to support the long distance flight and that was the reason remaining gasoline together with the war planes were the attacking "bombs".
2: Pearl Harbor attacker pilots from Japan Air Force carried out this order was to let Japan Navy be the power in the Sea. This order was carried out without any reservedness.
Europe was in war already that British Navy or French Navy were busy of their own fights against German and Italy, Pearl Harbor attack compromised U.S. Navy force to a large degree.
Without by-passing Europe, U.S could not participate any actions against Japanese Military.
Japan was announced Alley with Germany and Italy before Pearl Harbor attack by its diplomats efforts.
3: Tons of fought in Japanese wars in Asia that Japanese Military carried out when its Navy needed to pave ways for its Army, its Air Force needed to strike to let its Navy to survive, and Japanese Army just conquer its obstacles with full forces. All these fought were carried without with all it took.
4: It had been a nightmare in Asia in World War II time, with almost entire Asia fought against Japanese Military, the small personnel numbered Japanese Military fought like this everywhere they were ordered to fight.
5: Without Nucleus bomb, Japan Military still got what it takes to continue its fights for an imaginably long enough time.
----Oct. 10th, 2017
U.S military had been in wars outside U.S several times, why Vietnam war was its pain?
My response: I am martial art fan and this had been a question since I read General McArthur's autobiography.
General McArthur was the commander of Korean War. U.S military's role in this war was similar with its role in Vietnam war, to help its Southern government to fight against its Northern Communist government. Why U.S. military was enemy like to almost every Vietnamese whenever Vietnam war was mentioned while Korean's Southern government was understood as Korean's Northerners fought against whenever Korean war was discussed.
In that book, it says General McArthur always took military actions together with Korean Southern Military which sometimes comprised results.
My puzzle about Vietnam on this was answered in January of 2004's conference that there were some reasons that U.S military often had to take actions alone in Vietnam.
I said "This was possibly the reason all these actions by U.S military alone were understood as invasion."
I said if you look into China's WWII history of its Japanese-Chinese War, you would get it that not just people in Vietnam Northern Military's uniform but every single Vietnamese would fight against U.S.military if understood as invasion. U.S. military did not get this was the reason cause U.S. military in big trouble in Vietnam.
----Oct. 10th, 2017
Heard this morning's confronts of "I had worked since 1984."
My response: What that means? Is that female a strategist or a computer programmer? I heard she is a English speaking diplomat.
I was not graduated from a Military college, I was recruited a 3-Stars U. S. Military strategist because of my understanding of Japanese Military's outstanding performance in World War II. I am the first one convinced world wide Military strategists to research on Japanese Military's performance in World War II. I am the first person to say that taking action alone caused confusion of invasion was the reason of U.S military's troubles in Vietnam wars.
Why "worked since 1984" is enough for her to confront to say if I knew Martial Arts Strategy? In China, everyone can speak Chinese but there is still college education needed to have a Chinese speaking computer programmer or a Chinese speaking martial art strategist. English speaking or Chinese speaking alone is not enough to evaluate computer knowledge or martial art strategy.
I had this nightmare like freaking out experience when I was confronted by English major college gradates that BioGate was impossibly my work. I did BioGate project in Janus Associates' office with everyone fully aware of my progress and my frustrations during the process. I am the first person done Microsoft Window's Login replacement that way in entire world. If I was not the person, then who?
There were nothing other than "BioGate was just not yours, so shut up" in English, I could not imagine what cause the statement and no further clue for me to find out what cause the confusion. This "Shut up, Shut up" only by fluent English speaking only ESL group made me can do nothing but screamed.
*ESL: Language as Second Language.
----Oct. 10th, 2017
Heard the fought between a Mrs. Rockefeller and me in July 1st of 2004 conference caused a lot of confusion.
My response: The fought was because that Mrs. Rockefeller was a micro chip producer company's administrative personnel. Her objection was toward not-stable-enough micro hardware could not be rushed to go market. I raised my voice, together with the other two computer person, when she did not get what we mean by "we work with you".
It means: We are the computer person who use those micro-hardware, we are the signal-catchers of those micro-hardware as its consumer users, we certainly can help to stable those micro-hardware by telling the producing company she works for that where we having problems as signal-catchers to help her company to find out why it was not stable.
----Oct. 10th, 2017
听说了今天早上的质疑是有关我的三星将军策略家头衔。
我的回应：我被招募为美国军队三星将军策略家是因为我对二次大战中的日本军队的卓越表现和越南战争中的美国军队所犯错误的理解。面试就是在2004年1月的会议现场.
----2017年10月10日。
在我的理解里，为什么日本军队比普遍认同的德国军队在二次大战中的表现还出色？
我的回应：日本军队“联合起来我们一起面对”是日本军队在二次打仗中无保留充分执行日本军队策略家作战计划的原因。
德国军队在二次大战中是以"闪电战"的快捷迅速闻名，这明显是得益于其精备武器及优良装备。
我曾经读过一篇文章谈到日本进入第二次世界大战不是出于日本军队的鹰派主站雄心，而是因为日本军队的将领们没能成功的向日本政府说明日本不需要打仗。那篇文章里提到了就是因为这些辩论，日本军队面临的局面是他们要么证明日本军人是日本的骄傲，要么干脆自杀谢罪算了。这是造成日本军界空前跨军种的“联合起来我们一起面对”。(*注释：准确点说吧，不是什么“日本军队的将领们没能成功的向日本政府说明日本不需要打仗”， 而是军事才华在当时还没有包括语言类才华，当时的军人们都还没有接受过恰当的“辩论”用的语言训练。
----2017年10月17日更新）
我在2004年一月的会议上用了几个例子来说明：
1：珍珠港. 3000个飞行员没有一个是在从日本到夏威夷珍珠港的漫长飞行中途改变航向的，就没有一个是在没有有效监督的情况下改变航向的。战机只载有足够汽油以节省马达运力已完成长距离飞行，所以就是用所剩的汽油和战机作为攻击用的“炸弹的”。
2： 攻击珍珠港的飞行员是日本空军的空军飞行员，执行此项作战计划就是为了让日本的海军可以称霸海上。他们执行此计划完全没有任何保留。
当时欧洲已经陷入战争，英国和法国海军都忙着他们自己和德国及意大利的战争，珍珠港事件在很大程度上严重损伤了美国海军的实力。
不绕道欧洲，美国就没有可能参与针对日本的任何军事行动。
在珍珠港事件之前，日本外交官就已经宣布日本是德国和意大利的同盟国。
3：日本在亚洲战场上的很多战争，日本军队都是如此执行作战计划, 日本海军苦战就是为了给日本陆军开道，日本空军不惜一切就是为了让日本海军可以保存实力，而日本的陆军更是勇往直前，无惧面对一切。所有这些战役都是不惜一切以达到作战目的。
4：二战中的亚洲就像是一场噩梦，整个亚洲基本上都是在和日本军队作战，而人数很少的日本军队却是在各个战场都是如此按军令顽强作战。
5: 如果不是核弹，日本军队还有实力继续打仗而且是可以打上相当一段时间，这还一点都不难想像。
----2017年10月10日。
美国军队时有在美国本土以外作战，为什么越南战争是美国军队的痛处？
我的回应：我是一个军迷，在我读过一本麦克阿瑟将军的传记后，这个问题就一直让我好奇。
麦克阿瑟将军是朝鲜战争期间的美军总指挥官。美军在朝鲜战争中的角色和在越南战争中的差不多，都是在帮着其南方政府与其北方的共产主义政府作战。为什么提到朝鲜战争，都是讲美国和南韩政府的联军在打北韩共产党军队，而提到越南战争，是讲美国军队在越南处处挨打。
那本书里提到了麦克阿瑟将军一向喜欢和南韩政府军一同行动，有时候甚至造成了军事行动的效果不理想。
我对越南战争的好奇在2004年1月的会议上得到了回答：越南战争期间有很多问题造成美国军队经常要独自采取军事行动。
我说：“美国军队所有这些独自采取的行动可能是造成了“美国军队是在入侵”这种理解的原因。
我说啊，你要是看看中国二战历史上的中日战争就知道，一旦要是被认为是入侵，不是什么只有穿着军装的北方军，而是每一个越南人都会痛打美军。美国军队没理解到这点是造成美军在越南战争中的困境原因。
----2017年10月10日。
听说了今天早上“我从1984年就开始工作了”的争执。
我的回应：这是什么意思？那个女的是个电脑程序员，还是一个策略家？我听说她是一个讲英语的外交官。
我不是从军事院校毕业的，我被招募为三星将军是因为我对二战中的日本军队卓越表现的理解。我是第一个说服了全世界的军事策略家们去研究二战中日本军队的卓越表现，我是第一个阐述美军独自采取军事行动造成入侵误解是美军陷入越南战争泥淖的原因。
为什么“从1984年就开始工作了”就已经足够资历让她来质询我懂不懂军事战争策略？在中国，每一个人都是会说中文的，可还是需要大学教育培养电脑程序员和军事策略家。光是会说中文或者是还会说英语并不具备足够专业知识来评估别人是否有电脑知识或者有军事战争策略知识。
当我被英语专业毕业的那些人质疑电脑软件Bio Gate 根本不是我做的时候，就是这种噩梦般吓死人的经历。我做这个Bio Gate软件是在Janus Associates这个公司的办公室里完成的，那儿的每个人都是亲眼看见我的每一步成就以及我的每一个纠结。我是整个世界上第一个把微软公司的视窗登陆系统给彻底换掉的，说这软件不是我做的，那能是谁做的？
除了用英语说的”Bio Gate不是你的，闭嘴“就再也没有其他了，没有任何线索究竟什么原因造成了困扰。就是这些就只是会说ESL英语而已的人，也就只有一句一句用英语说的”闭嘴，闭嘴“再无其他内容的挑衅，让我除了尖叫怒吼还是尖叫怒吼。
*ESL: 英语是第二语言(外语).
----2017年10月10日
听说了我和一个洛克菲勒夫人在2004年7月1日会议上的争执造成了一些误解。
我的回应：那个洛克菲勒夫人当时是微型硬件开发公司的办公室工作人员。她反对的是在微型硬件稳定性不过关的情况下而急于上市场的做法。在她就是弄不清我们说”我们和你们一起解决这个问题“是什么意思时，我是和另两个搞电脑的一起，扯着嗓门和她说”我们和你们一起解决这个问题“。
这话的意思是：我们搞电脑的就是这些微型硬件的使用者，我们所需要写的软件的一部分就是要扑捉这些微型硬件所传导的信号，我们当然可以作为微型硬件的用户告诉生产厂家我们在扑捉信号的过程中发生了什么问题，来协助解决微型硬件不稳定的原因。
----2017年10月10日。
Sunday, October 8, 2017
10-08-2017 More About Lehman Brother's and CDC Valuable Papers (更多有关雷曼兄弟及CDC有价证券）
10-09-2017 Heard this morning's broadcasting is reporting style.
My response: I agree. I will stop updating my blog unless my explanations are needed. I do have the willingness to write more when I am healthier with better English and Chinese in writing.
My treatment progress well even with some enhanced harassment. This cancer can be treated fast enough, I am looking forward to be back to complete biological healthy before I know.
----Oct. 9th, 2017
10-08-2017 More About Lehman Brother's and CDC Valuable Papers(更多有关雷曼兄弟及CDC有价证券）
Head this morning's confusion conversation,（中文附后）
My response: Ya.
Heard question about "why government would let Lehman Brother like that in a lawful U.S.A."
My response: CDC is the real reason and my financial lost is my own idea.
1: The "evil" investor I was trying to setup is myself. So it is my greatest idea to let this happen to myself. And I did have very good intention to "take care of " other possibly impacted parties in my smartest setup plan.
2: CDC is the real reason that Lehman Brother has financial turmoil. CDC basically is loans having higher interest rate. For example, if the base housing loan from Freddie Mac, is only 2% to its quota-ed financial institutes, normally, financial institute will add some service charge and to sell to another non-quota-ed financial institute at something like 3% interest rate or sell to the home buyer directly at higher home loan interest rate, the concern of this business is the risk of loans going default, so the buyer financial institute will sell loans they bought to home buyers directly or don't buy if the in-financial-institute loan interest rate is already at a certain level that raise the risk if home buyer can afford the loan interest rate to pay the loan off. CDC is the type of loan that "ignore" the risk evaluation if higher interest rate loans will go default. The CDC had been wide spread in 2004 already was the real reason of Lehman Brother's story.
3: The difference between regular home loan interest rate 8% to CDC's 15%-20% interest rate is the financial impact of CDC. My setup plan was to let Lehman Brothers' buy as much as these CDCs as possible to hold or to sell at non-CDC market interest rate (8% rate). The difference between Lehman Brother's bought-in high interest rate CDC papers and sold-off low interest rate non-CDC papers are my own "setup" of my own financial loss.
If some of you still have any CDC valuable papers bought from Lehman Brothers, the face price you bought should below interest rate 8% priced and you certainly can sell those valuable papers now if you haven't. (* current home loan is at 5% or so)
*Note: 8%, 15-20% are all example interest rate.
4:The featured three person in my smartest setup planing conversation, the pissed-off investor is the person taking good care of my inheritance, the complainer is the impacted by investor's family's investment choice, I am the ungrateful beneficiary of the investor's family's investment decision. So I heard that both investor and complainer love to watch number-sensitive-me to see the number of my own smartest setup.
5: I have no problem with Lehman Brothers' this name or this company with its management, both the investor and the complainer are fully aware of that for certain. Heard some confusion about recent rumors related to Lehman Brother's, I firmly believe both the investor and the complainer would take good care of the possibles if there is anything unusual.
----Oct. 8th, 2017
Heard Chinese Central Bank bough some CDCs from Lehman Brothers is one of the reason of the tone.
My response: I assume Chinese central government officials can evaluate if those CDCs bought are already profiting.
----Oct. 8th, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播根本就是稀里糊涂。
我的回应：是啊。
听说了“为什么在美国这样的法治国家会发生雷曼兄弟这样的事呢？”
我的回应：CDC 有价证劵是真正的原因，我自己的财务损失是我自己的主意。
1：我想要修理修理的那个”坏蛋“投资人就是我自己。所以说这是我自己的主意让我自己遭受经济损失。当时我也是很好心的”考虑到了“那些在我的”修理“计划里可能受到影响的其他单位及个人。
My response: I agree. I will stop updating my blog unless my explanations are needed. I do have the willingness to write more when I am healthier with better English and Chinese in writing.
My treatment progress well even with some enhanced harassment. This cancer can be treated fast enough, I am looking forward to be back to complete biological healthy before I know.
----Oct. 9th, 2017
10-08-2017 More About Lehman Brother's and CDC Valuable Papers(更多有关雷曼兄弟及CDC有价证券）
Head this morning's confusion conversation,（中文附后）
My response: Ya.
Heard question about "why government would let Lehman Brother like that in a lawful U.S.A."
My response: CDC is the real reason and my financial lost is my own idea.
1: The "evil" investor I was trying to setup is myself. So it is my greatest idea to let this happen to myself. And I did have very good intention to "take care of " other possibly impacted parties in my smartest setup plan.
2: CDC is the real reason that Lehman Brother has financial turmoil. CDC basically is loans having higher interest rate. For example, if the base housing loan from Freddie Mac, is only 2% to its quota-ed financial institutes, normally, financial institute will add some service charge and to sell to another non-quota-ed financial institute at something like 3% interest rate or sell to the home buyer directly at higher home loan interest rate, the concern of this business is the risk of loans going default, so the buyer financial institute will sell loans they bought to home buyers directly or don't buy if the in-financial-institute loan interest rate is already at a certain level that raise the risk if home buyer can afford the loan interest rate to pay the loan off. CDC is the type of loan that "ignore" the risk evaluation if higher interest rate loans will go default. The CDC had been wide spread in 2004 already was the real reason of Lehman Brother's story.
3: The difference between regular home loan interest rate 8% to CDC's 15%-20% interest rate is the financial impact of CDC. My setup plan was to let Lehman Brothers' buy as much as these CDCs as possible to hold or to sell at non-CDC market interest rate (8% rate). The difference between Lehman Brother's bought-in high interest rate CDC papers and sold-off low interest rate non-CDC papers are my own "setup" of my own financial loss.
If some of you still have any CDC valuable papers bought from Lehman Brothers, the face price you bought should below interest rate 8% priced and you certainly can sell those valuable papers now if you haven't. (* current home loan is at 5% or so)
*Note: 8%, 15-20% are all example interest rate.
4:The featured three person in my smartest setup planing conversation, the pissed-off investor is the person taking good care of my inheritance, the complainer is the impacted by investor's family's investment choice, I am the ungrateful beneficiary of the investor's family's investment decision. So I heard that both investor and complainer love to watch number-sensitive-me to see the number of my own smartest setup.
5: I have no problem with Lehman Brothers' this name or this company with its management, both the investor and the complainer are fully aware of that for certain. Heard some confusion about recent rumors related to Lehman Brother's, I firmly believe both the investor and the complainer would take good care of the possibles if there is anything unusual.
----Oct. 8th, 2017
Heard Chinese Central Bank bough some CDCs from Lehman Brothers is one of the reason of the tone.
My response: I assume Chinese central government officials can evaluate if those CDCs bought are already profiting.
----Oct. 8th, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播根本就是稀里糊涂。
我的回应：是啊。
听说了“为什么在美国这样的法治国家会发生雷曼兄弟这样的事呢？”
我的回应：CDC 有价证劵是真正的原因，我自己的财务损失是我自己的主意。
1：我想要修理修理的那个”坏蛋“投资人就是我自己。所以说这是我自己的主意让我自己遭受经济损失。当时我也是很好心的”考虑到了“那些在我的”修理“计划里可能受到影响的其他单位及个人。
2：CDC有价证劵是造成雷曼兄弟经营波动的真正原因。CDC其实就是一些利率比较高的贷款。打个比方，如果房地美（国家贷款公司）是以2%的基数利率买房贷款，有资格从两房贷款的金融机构会加上一些手续费以，比如，3%的利率再卖给其他不够资格从房地美拿贷款的那些金融机构，或者直接以高一点的利率给买房需要贷款的人。这种生意的风险就是贷款会不会还不上钱了。所以当金融机构之间的利率已经比较高需要担心贷款的人可能还不上钱的的情况下，金融机构要么就不买入或者直接给买房需要贷款的人。CDC这种贷款就是“忽略”了贷款风险的一种贷款。而2004年到处蔓延的CDC贷款是造成雷曼兄弟故事的真正原因。
3：常规的8% 买房贷款利息和CDC贷款的15-20%买房贷款利息之间的差价就是CDC这种贷款可能会造成的金融经济影响。我的修理计划就是让雷曼兄弟尽量买进高价高利率的CDC贷款再以平价低利率的CDC卖出贷款或者就是持在手上。雷曼兄弟的高利率CDC的高价位买入价和雷曼兄弟平价的CDC贷款卖出价是我自己“修理”自己造成的我自己的经济损失。
如果你还持有从雷曼兄弟买入的CDC有价证劵，你的票面买入价应该要比8%利率的票面买入价要低，你现在手上如果还有这样的雷曼兄弟卖出的CDC有价证劵，你可以问一下是否已经可以售出平仓或赚钱了。（*现在美国的房贷利率是5%左右）
*注意：8%，15-20%都是举例利率。
4：在那个修理计划的三个主要角色，气坏了的投资人是个尽职尽责照看着我所继承的一个基金的那一个，抱怨的是个家里财富被投资人家里的投资选择给伤筋动骨了的那一个，我是投资人家里的投资决定得到利益者却是很不知好歹的那一个。所以我是有听说啊，那个投资人和那个抱怨的都在等着看我这个“数字敏感者”看到我自己”极其聪明的自己修理自己计划的成果“会是什么表情了。
*注意：8%，15-20%都是举例利率。
4：在那个修理计划的三个主要角色，气坏了的投资人是个尽职尽责照看着我所继承的一个基金的那一个，抱怨的是个家里财富被投资人家里的投资选择给伤筋动骨了的那一个，我是投资人家里的投资决定得到利益者却是很不知好歹的那一个。所以我是有听说啊，那个投资人和那个抱怨的都在等着看我这个“数字敏感者”看到我自己”极其聪明的自己修理自己计划的成果“会是什么表情了。
5：我对雷曼兄弟这个名字，这家公司及公司的管理团队都没有任何意见，投资人和抱怨的也都非常清楚这点。听说了雷曼兄弟的一些传言，如果真是有什么不平常的，我坚定相信投资人或者抱怨的都是不会袖手旁观的。
----2017年10月8日。
听说了中国中央银行（人民银行）有买一些雷曼兄弟卖出的CDC是造成口气蛮横的一个原因。
我的回应：我估计中国中央政府已经可以评估这些CDC是否已经到了可以赚钱的价位了。
----2017年10月8日。
----2017年10月8日。
听说了中国中央银行（人民银行）有买一些雷曼兄弟卖出的CDC是造成口气蛮横的一个原因。
我的回应：我估计中国中央政府已经可以评估这些CDC是否已经到了可以赚钱的价位了。
----2017年10月8日。
Saturday, October 7, 2017
10-07-2017 Why Chinese government insist on to state me being a fake ？ (为什么中国政府坚持要把我说成是个假的？）
10-07-2017 Why Chinese government insist on to state me being a fake ？ (为什么中国政府坚持要把我说成是个假的？）
Heard this morning's union movie style radio program production（中文附后）.
My response: Ya, I have not figure out when union movie need to have a crying scene. So I have not idea what this morning's story is about.
I said that is the tears from wolves.( I will update once I figured out the above puzzle). I just shit my annoyance now. Why are they crying for? Almost 4 years' since 2014, this shit me all over is for this morning's great moment of announcement? Why those "hard to have this achieved" people need to shed their fake tears? Who are the crying ones? * Heard they are government officials, union movie style, then I will be alright.
For those who are curious will I be able to survive if announcements are real? That is of course since I am being the independent female, not just financially.
----Oct. 7th, 2017
Why Chinese government insist on saying I am fake?
My response: Rumors I heard about are:
1: My inheritances and 20% service fee.
2: My $200 Million donation in 2004.
3*: The rumored y privileged private usage real estate property Lots in good locations that specially rewarded by Chinese government for me being the creator of 2008 Olympic Game Opening.
4*: The rumored reward from Chinese government regarding my contribution in China's development as you heard on the radio.
5: The rumored 1% tax incentive reward.
* rewarded before 2012 of this term Beijing administration。
My understanding of the possible logic:
If I can be announced fake, then my inheritances can be transferred to another name to earn service fee, and my donation can not be considered mine and can be requested to give to other people per "real owner" request.
If I can be announced fake, then my reward should be taken back to reward from Chinese government those who really deserve all.
----Oct. 7th, 2017
Heard 1989 is another major issue between me and this term Beijing Administration.
My response: Beijing Central Government has 1989 meeting record and I did hear the rumor that famous Beijing major's family insist on his portrait's copyright. I thought he was in the meeting during his work hours as Beijing major.
Heard that meeting was 1989 Chinese Steel trading style negotiating. I did not agree to pay to let Beijing Central government to govern students marching on the street. I did not agree to anything at all because I had no idea that was some negotiation requested to government officials and student movement-ers by someone who is neither government official nor student movement-ers.
Other than my security tape only have my "solo voice" instead of vivid meeting site recording, or harder to say I am fake if broadcast, I do not know why radio program do not produce this part of my life story.
* That negotiating somebody is just like "supermarket parking lot volunteer helper" who jump out from nowhere to help and to demand for helping fee. The same motive as well.
----Oct. 7th, 2017
听说了今天早上广播延续1920年代美国工会电影风格。
我的回应： 好像是，但我还没弄清在工会电影里什么时候会需要一场哭戏来表达什么。所以我不是太清楚今天早上的故事讲的是什么。*工会电影是很有名的固定格式套路表演风格。
我说这根本是狐狸的眼泪。（我弄清楚上面的谜团会更正）。我现在也就是发发牢骚。他们哭什么呀？从2014年开始近四年时间对我骂东骂西，就为今天早上这么一个伟大时刻所发表的声明，还哭？他们这些努力奋斗达到此目的的一群人还假惺惺地哭什么呀？谁是哪痛哭的一群？（*听说是一些政府官员在哭，工会电影风格的话，我就不会太惨了。）
对于那些“如果今天早上的声明是真，我能熬下来吗”的好奇？那当然了，我是很独立的女性，不仅只是财务上，而是各个方面。
----2017年10月7日。
为什么中国政府坚持就是要把我说成是假的?
我的回应：我听到的传言有：
1：我所继承的财产及20%的回扣。
2：我在2004年的2亿美金捐款。
3*：传说中的中国政府因为我是2008北京奥运会开幕式的创意人所给的特殊房地产好区好地段的私房用地（Lots）。
4*：传说中的中国政府就我对中国发展的贡献（有些贡献就是你在广播上听到的）而给与的奖励。
5：传说中的1%的税收奖励。
*奖励是在2012年这一届北京政府执政之前。
我估计这么做可能的思路逻辑：
如果能把我宣布成个假冒伪造，就可以把我所继承的财产给转个名字而挣那20%的回扣，就可以把我2004年捐的2亿美金按”真正主人的要求“归某些人所有。
如果能把我宣布成个假冒伪造，就可以把中国政府给我的奖励重新给就是够资格的某些人。
----2017年10月7日。
听说了1989年是这届北京中央政府和我之间另一个很大的矛盾。
我的回应：北京中央政府有会议影音档案，我也听说了北京市长陈希同家人坚持他的肖像权。我以为他是在上班时间以北京市长身份参加会议。
听说了1989年的会议是中国八十年代钢材生意的讨价还价。我当时什么都没答应，我从未答应付钱给任何人来允许中国政府对游行学生进行管理。我当时就是什么都没答应，根本就没听懂当时有既非政府也非学生的人士在和政府及学生“讨价还价”。
除了我的保安录音带只有我一个人的单声道而不是会议的生动现场，或者一旦公布就更难说我是假的了之外，我不清楚为什么广播剧不播出我人生故事的这一段。
*讨价还价的那个就像是这边超市停车场的“志愿帮手”，也不知从哪蹦出来的，过来就帮你拎东西，然后就要你付钱。也是出于同样的原因。
----2017年10月7日。
Heard this morning's union movie style radio program production（中文附后）.
My response: Ya, I have not figure out when union movie need to have a crying scene. So I have not idea what this morning's story is about.
I said that is the tears from wolves.( I will update once I figured out the above puzzle). I just shit my annoyance now. Why are they crying for? Almost 4 years' since 2014, this shit me all over is for this morning's great moment of announcement? Why those "hard to have this achieved" people need to shed their fake tears? Who are the crying ones? * Heard they are government officials, union movie style, then I will be alright.
For those who are curious will I be able to survive if announcements are real? That is of course since I am being the independent female, not just financially.
----Oct. 7th, 2017
Why Chinese government insist on saying I am fake?
My response: Rumors I heard about are:
1: My inheritances and 20% service fee.
2: My $200 Million donation in 2004.
3*: The rumored y privileged private usage real estate property Lots in good locations that specially rewarded by Chinese government for me being the creator of 2008 Olympic Game Opening.
4*: The rumored reward from Chinese government regarding my contribution in China's development as you heard on the radio.
5: The rumored 1% tax incentive reward.
* rewarded before 2012 of this term Beijing administration。
My understanding of the possible logic:
If I can be announced fake, then my inheritances can be transferred to another name to earn service fee, and my donation can not be considered mine and can be requested to give to other people per "real owner" request.
If I can be announced fake, then my reward should be taken back to reward from Chinese government those who really deserve all.
----Oct. 7th, 2017
Heard 1989 is another major issue between me and this term Beijing Administration.
My response: Beijing Central Government has 1989 meeting record and I did hear the rumor that famous Beijing major's family insist on his portrait's copyright. I thought he was in the meeting during his work hours as Beijing major.
Heard that meeting was 1989 Chinese Steel trading style negotiating. I did not agree to pay to let Beijing Central government to govern students marching on the street. I did not agree to anything at all because I had no idea that was some negotiation requested to government officials and student movement-ers by someone who is neither government official nor student movement-ers.
Other than my security tape only have my "solo voice" instead of vivid meeting site recording, or harder to say I am fake if broadcast, I do not know why radio program do not produce this part of my life story.
* That negotiating somebody is just like "supermarket parking lot volunteer helper" who jump out from nowhere to help and to demand for helping fee. The same motive as well.
----Oct. 7th, 2017
听说了今天早上广播延续1920年代美国工会电影风格。
我的回应： 好像是，但我还没弄清在工会电影里什么时候会需要一场哭戏来表达什么。所以我不是太清楚今天早上的故事讲的是什么。*工会电影是很有名的固定格式套路表演风格。
我说这根本是狐狸的眼泪。（我弄清楚上面的谜团会更正）。我现在也就是发发牢骚。他们哭什么呀？从2014年开始近四年时间对我骂东骂西，就为今天早上这么一个伟大时刻所发表的声明，还哭？他们这些努力奋斗达到此目的的一群人还假惺惺地哭什么呀？谁是哪痛哭的一群？（*听说是一些政府官员在哭，工会电影风格的话，我就不会太惨了。）
对于那些“如果今天早上的声明是真，我能熬下来吗”的好奇？那当然了，我是很独立的女性，不仅只是财务上，而是各个方面。
----2017年10月7日。
为什么中国政府坚持就是要把我说成是假的?
我的回应：我听到的传言有：
1：我所继承的财产及20%的回扣。
2：我在2004年的2亿美金捐款。
3*：传说中的中国政府因为我是2008北京奥运会开幕式的创意人所给的特殊房地产好区好地段的私房用地（Lots）。
4*：传说中的中国政府就我对中国发展的贡献（有些贡献就是你在广播上听到的）而给与的奖励。
5：传说中的1%的税收奖励。
*奖励是在2012年这一届北京政府执政之前。
我估计这么做可能的思路逻辑：
如果能把我宣布成个假冒伪造，就可以把我所继承的财产给转个名字而挣那20%的回扣，就可以把我2004年捐的2亿美金按”真正主人的要求“归某些人所有。
如果能把我宣布成个假冒伪造，就可以把中国政府给我的奖励重新给就是够资格的某些人。
----2017年10月7日。
听说了1989年是这届北京中央政府和我之间另一个很大的矛盾。
我的回应：北京中央政府有会议影音档案，我也听说了北京市长陈希同家人坚持他的肖像权。我以为他是在上班时间以北京市长身份参加会议。
听说了1989年的会议是中国八十年代钢材生意的讨价还价。我当时什么都没答应，我从未答应付钱给任何人来允许中国政府对游行学生进行管理。我当时就是什么都没答应，根本就没听懂当时有既非政府也非学生的人士在和政府及学生“讨价还价”。
除了我的保安录音带只有我一个人的单声道而不是会议的生动现场，或者一旦公布就更难说我是假的了之外，我不清楚为什么广播剧不播出我人生故事的这一段。
*讨价还价的那个就像是这边超市停车场的“志愿帮手”，也不知从哪蹦出来的，过来就帮你拎东西，然后就要你付钱。也是出于同样的原因。
----2017年10月7日。
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)