05-31-2018 Inheriting means money received is from a deceased who should be a dead body corrpse already, never from a living prominent

05-31-2018 Inheriting means money received is from a deceased who should be a dead body corrpse already, never from a living prominent


Heard this morning's talk about $400Million.
My response: Since this $400 Million is American money in confusion, so I use English to explain what I heard of.

First of all, I said, "I inherited money" and I was never corrected the entire time on both June 30th and July 1st of 2004. Inheriting means I got my money from some already dead persons who died on or before June 30th of 2004. The intention to use the money ownership confusion theme to curse all these living prominent rich is never from me.

Second of all, I inherited is the Trust Inheritances, not the family inheritances. The difference can be illustrated as: A grandfather of mine gave me a gift of Trust as a Christmas gift on the morning of a Christmas day, and he died in a car accident on the next day which is the December 26th of the same year. Is that Christmas gift of Trust can be counted as what he left behind? Never, of course. The Christmas gift of Trust is what I inherited, what my grandfather left behind his death was the family inheritance. I inherited my Trusts from several generation grandfathers after their deaths so that these Trusts are my Trust Inheritances. I inherited each of my Trust inheritance as the sole beneficiary person according to the settlor grandfather's will.

Third, I heard there are actually 2 instances of $400 Million in this morning's broadcasting. One was transmitted on November 1st of 2014 which is the one currently in Connecticut's New Haven area, the other one argued that is still in Washington area is the one transmitted to Treasury Department on November 1st of 2016. Both have $400,000 service fee paid each month to the Treasury Department for a full year from the November 1of the paying year. These 2 instances of $400 Million are from two different Trust Inheritances of mine. This $400Million a year is my daily living expenses providing that Treasure Department agreed to help to transmit to me on July 1st of 2004.

Fourth, this morning's Chinese producing team, I heard, is heavily staffed with the offspring of the siblings of my grandfather's former private assistant. This private assistant's own offspring and related are also involved. I heard they have been involved in producing efforts since 2014.

I heard, this private assistant was the receipt person in Shanghai who had received ￥9000 RMB each month since the month I was born till I left China in 1996 when I was 29years old. My parents never received a penny from this ￥9,000 RMB monthly living expenses providing ever since I was born.

I heard, this ￥9,000 RMB per month had been part of the $10,000 U.S. dollar per month which had been paid by the American "Pejoves" Fund, the exchange rate had been fixed $1=￥1 till 1980 or so. I heard the amount of $10,000 has not been changed since it started in July of 1967.

My grandfather passed away in 1965 before I was born, I heard this private assistant became my grandfather's assistant since my father joined the Chinese Army in early 1949 and served my grandfather until his death. I heard this private assistant Yu(于) was a son-in-law to my grandfather romantically involved ex-girlfriend's cousin. I heard my grandfather never involved with this private assistant's mother-in-law. I heard the ex-girlfriend's marriage family as well as her child from the marriage, biologically, have been Hong Kong residents since 1948. The Trust this grandfather set up for me is the Hong Kong Trust which has nothing to do with any $400 Million in the U.S. Treasure Department stories but $500Million transferred from Hong Kong in 2004 story.

I was born in the crazy 1967 when China was having the Culture Revolution (Red Guards Revolution) and I grew up smooth are the reasons that I am listening what happened instead of accusing immediately. But you can hear from this radio program's broadcasting, it is all about who truly deserve this living expense providing instead of who lawfully own this $400 Million.

----May 31st, 2018

05-30-2018 每月一万美金是怎么回事以及我现在究竟有没有生活费用

05-30-2018 每月一万美金是怎么回事以及我现在究竟有没有生活费用


听说了今天早上提到了我在中国期间每月1万美金生活费用给付。
我的回应：我听说的也是美国方面每月汇出$10,000美金到香港，由香港扣除$1000美金手续费后￥9000人民币交付上海方面，当时汇率是1：1，后来听说是按官方汇率将人民币交付上海方面。我父母和我是在南京生活，一分钱也没收到。

香港手续费很贵是因为我是于1967年在中国文化大革命期间出生的，这笔钱是从1967年7月我出生后开始每月支付，直到我1996年10月离开中国后停止向中国方面支付。美国方面在明知我没有收到一分钱的清况下继续支付有美国方面自己的原因，我本人也已在此博客上用英语表态我已在美国生活20年，能理解美国方面确实会有自己的原因，不会多想。

1965年或1966年将我母亲的结婚礼物送到上海的也是这同一个香港方面，上海方面是当年跟随我爷爷方智仁近16年的私人助理，我爷爷方智仁是1965年去世。我大表哥1964出生，我是我爷爷的第二个孙辈，我弟弟是第三个于1969年出生。

----2018年5月30日。


现在为什么没有生活费用给付可以让我日常使用？
我的回应：
我现在的生活费用已经由美国方面给付，我的信托都是按我办理信托时的决定按时支付了我所需要的费用，从2015年起听说已经增加到每年4亿美金的生活费用，每年财政年度开始就支付，听说手续费是每月40万美金，也就是大概每年1.2%左右。听说还在找这些已经由我的信托支付给我使用的钱都在哪里卡着。

我目前对钱进银行的担心是真实，因为电子转账实在太快太容易，我好像又被人给盯上了，一旦有点风吹草动，我就有可能不能提取现金，就一直得等到钱又回到我账上才可以有钱用。我这份担心是真实，我也确实有打算在身上放点儿，在家里藏点儿，日常生活就用银行里的。

我现在就是只在银行账户里放一点每月需要通过银行付账的钱，其余都是全部提取现金随身携带。我现在因为不付房租水电，买食品用粮食卷（类似商店的礼品卷，只能购买食品，不做现金通用），所以我现在身上现金不是很多/。收到生活费后，也会有比现在明显的保安服务，所以也不是太担心家居和个人安全，就只担心电子转账实在太快了。

一直听说华裔圈里有传言，只要能有机会拿到钱，就可以跑回中国过一辈子，有中国政府支持根本不用怕。说是只要我敢把钱放银行，就有华为和华裔；要想把钱放家里，从天上把你房子炸了，从地上或踹门而入或乔装用钥匙开门，从地下挖个地道一天一两百米根本不是问题。所以我就开始叫唤我把钱全放身上，只要有高科技保安服务，我在美国领土上是连人带钱都安全了。

再加上那一群莺莺燕燕的中国政府扯着嗓门的叫唤她们的奶子屁股才是真实中国奶子真实中国屁股才是全世界公性都馋得紧要得着的真正中国，这是为什么我痛骂中国政府根本是一个卖淫集团犯罪团伙被取名为了政府。

----2018年5月30日。

05-29-2018 My apartment from Boston Housing Authority

05-29-2018 My apartment from Boston Housing Authority


Heard about this morning's talk of how I moved into this Housing Project Apartment.
My response: I heard the enrollment specialist Veronica who enrolled me into my current MBA education of a west coast college in 2017is the same social worker Veronica from Boston Hope Found who had signed me this apartment I currently living in Boston, MA in 2010.

She is the same caring helpful on my MBA education. I heard she enrolled me through random enrollment campaign call, and I assume it must be really surprising to her that the person who picked up the phone was the Boston Min Fang she knew as a homeless.

She was the person tried to ask me some questions when I was homeless she helped as a social worker. I regret my rejection, I should let her probe a little because let me be a homeless was advised by a person who might have been provided for by that $10,000 monthly living expenses providing from the American "Pejoves" Fund since I was born in July of 1967 till I left China in October of 1996. I heard the adviser was mothered by a sister of the person who had received this monthly providing in Shanghai to sent it to Nanjing to my parents but my parents never received a penny.

I heard this receipt person was a private assistant (于）to my grandfather after my father joined the Military in 1949 till my grandfather passed away in 1965, I heard all his own offsprings and his siblings' offspring and some of their marriage families associated have been in the Chinese producing team of this radio program.

I heard this private assistant's wife was not fathered by my grandfather and his mother-in-law was never involved with my grandfather romantically. At least, this "not fathered by" certainly can be verified by a DNA test.

This morning's story about how my grandfather willing to financially support dating activity instead of academic advances. This story was this Mr. Private Assistant's family saying about my father's relationship with my grandparents whenever my father demanding something he really wanted. Well, if you read this blog, you already knew with me this was because my grandfather was so eagerly waiting for me to be born to ease his financial strains. He entrusted 5 Million silver dollar to the birthmark girl who should be born from my father's line, the Hong Kong Trust I inherited, and all he had was only ￥70,000- ￥80,000 at the time to support his entire family which included his 4 adult children and my grandmother for the rest of his & my grandmother's years.

This Boston housing apartment from Boston Housing Authority was booked on July 1st of 2004, together booked some food stamps with cash assistance for my homeless adventure. I moved in since 2013 and got my food stamps at the same time. But it was only supposed to be one year in this apartment and I only on-and-off got $300 cash assistance for Massachusetts' disabled since January of 2015.

I wish I could tell this angel Veronica that Boston refuse to listen to my story that I inherited money is the reason I got stuck in my current housing. I kept screaming I said I inherited something to a lot of people from Boston on July 1st of 2004 which means I got money from someone who died already on or before July 1st of 2004, my inherited money should not be from any living one. 

Trusts I inherited have been paying everything on time as decided on July 1st of 2004. I suppose to have food and cash from Boston or Massachusetts Food Stamp card but amounted as a computer programmer's salary income since 2014 or 2015, I should have moved into apartments with paid maid-service since 2015, etc. All these should have been paid on time already. Rumored $400 Millions yearly providing is not paid to Boston or Massachusetts but these should be paid to Boston or Massachusetts. Since 2015, everywhere I asked has kept quiet to my inquiries which seems to imply no such money should have been allocated, now I know it was not a secret that all these prominent males had announced nothing to do with me at all or moved on already through some channels. But all these should have been paid by my own money that I inherited from my own deceased birth grandfathers, not some living prominent males.

It is already 2018 and I heard this morning's announcing efforts from the radio program to evict me from this apartment because it is so confusing to some females how I could have money without a sex partner. Well, my money is either inherited from a deceased birth grandfather or my own making. I am currently waiting to be "rescued".

----May 29th, 2018

05-28-2018 My "rebut" on this morning's Judge's Rulings

05-28-2018 My "rebut" on this morning's Judges' Rulings


Heard this morning's broadcasting of the Chinese American Judge's and the People's Republic of China's Judge's ruling.
My response:
I never contacted such 6 patrons nor anyone for any financial providing to me nor the children who I have claimed my biologic children.

I have already asked U.S. law enforcement's help on the possible child-abuse efforts from the radio program producing & its related promotion to target the 2012-published girl.

I have already contacted the U.S. law enforcement regarding radio program's intentional blackmail against my public image.

I have already contacted the U.S. law enforcement regarding the efforts of the radio program producing to intentionally culture hate against me being the financially independent female.


The efforts of my biological & same parents' younger brother and his marriage family to take-over my father's own apartment had caused my biological lawful father currently being missing and being legally announced the death.

The efforts of my biological & same parents' younger brother and his marriage family to take over what I lawfully own have caused my financial well-being together with my personal safety in jeopardy.

I have informed the U.S. government's official and the People's Republic of China's government officials that I refuse to be provided by my biological & same parents' younger brother nor his marriage family for any reason, and I refuse to provide for my biological same & parents' younger brother nor his marriage family for any reason.


My life has been threatened by Albert Gore's murder-intended-for-money publicly announced
multiple times on the radio that produced to call for actual murder action in reality on the soil of the United States, and today also in the name of protecting this marriage family on the soil of the People's Republic of China.

I have already contacted the U.S. law enforcement regarding my accusation against Albert Gore's public robbery and public murder-attempted-for-money through the radio program producing since 2007.

I have contacted the U.S law enforcement regarding my income from this radio program has been, rumored, illegally taken with the help from the American rich Rockefellers' family.

I have already contacted the U.S. law enforcement regarding severe sexual harassment and hate culturing efforts that targeted me in the producing & promoting of this radio program.

----May 28th, 2018

05-27-2018 A MBA Student's analysis of what the Radio Program is trying to demonstrate (I) - Decision Power

05-27-2018 A MBA Student's analysis of what the Radio Program is trying to demonstrate (I) - Decision Power

The PPC curve is related to the market model of demand and supply, and the most important is how the curve is shifted as a whole versus the output combination shifted individually.

The demand and supply curve in any industry including special industry is by the local LAWS of demand and supply.

I will use the human nature of mating desire to illustrate the demand and supply even though that sounds like a demonstration of the special industry of prostitutes, but it is the demand purely from human sexual desire without any further consideration of possible restriction if matrimony is not in consideration.

I have been a "loner" resident of Boston, Massachusetts since mid of 2004, I had heard a lot of rumors related to this morning's broadcasting that I think the demonstrated effort pf this broadcasting is to "efficiently push the current output combination out of the wealth of the PPC Curve". So, I analyze it as the following:

What would move the PPC curve, versus what would move the current output combination

Satisfying a requested-demand is restricted by the supply of the resources in quality as well as in quantity in a market economy but by the wish, ill or decent, of the chief provider who has the decision power of what demand to satisfy in a pure command economy. The demanding law from the desire to own good quality resources as cheap as possible also determines the prices of the resources or the strength of the decision power of the chief provider. 

Well, the realistic "rumor demonstration" is: To highlight a private economy's (obviously a pure command economy) chief provider's decision power of refusal that is based on its own self-illusional demands which have never actually been requested from the owner of another completely independent and completely not-related market economy (obviously I am a market economy on this matter). Even though his is totally against local harassment LAWS, this is the Blackmail Strategy called "Prevention Purpose" from the Economy in Transition (the People's Republic of China) without any LAWS nor the knowledge of what is its economy's possible boundary, nor the appropriate training education to prevent its government's representatives to worry if the Chinese economy of a government’s Central Reserve is eligible to supply a U.S. citizen's living expenses on the U.S. soil.

In this demonstration, I am the illustration of "the loud refusal to pay for the past sexual activities have been loudly broadcasted without any such demand ever has been requested by me at all". and I am the person actually have concerned "if rumored transacted-already $5000 is paid from my account that is totally another independent economy which I am the self-provider in charge", and it did arouse the question if I have to seek local laws help to find out who actually paid that $5000? It is great to hear that it is announced this morning it should not be my concern at all in a lawful country. Thus, this "rumor demonstration" is obviously a good example of different decision powers from a pure command economy, a market economy and an in-transition economy which makes the PPC curves of each economy so confusing in this inter-economy world, and how the PPC curve of a market economy can be impacted or moved by the decision power of another economy's concern of whether to satisfy a demand, which demonstrated as move inwardly by never-made-demand or move outwardly by the concern of whose money paid that $5000, in this mixed world together with the pure command economy and the in-transition economy.

The demanding law which decides the price of the supplied resource is from the desire to own, and if the supply can satisfy the demand is related to the price but based on quality and quantities of the resources supplied.

In prostituting industry, the quality is the female's sexual attraction and the quantity would be how many sexually attractive females in the supplying chain. The aged female body certainly would reduce the quality of sexual attraction to the reality of "should lower the asking price" and the refusal of the acceptance of this reality would certainly reduce the demand that may have mixed sexual attraction expectation with "some affection". A pure command economy can be the example of purely wish based economy that the chief provider's decision power can change a locally famous unwanted story* to be a world-wide announced wanted story just several years later without any rumored connection in between, or to showcase an unattractive aged can never change to be attractive no matter how hard the female insists on to demand the "price expected should be the original asking price". Well, this characteristic prostituting industry's supply-demand market model would be a true statement to any independent economy including the People's Republic China which impressively has a state-supported prostituting industry to facilitate this demonstration of this decision power this professionally with the proud as a government.

*Actually, I heard new rumor is that money-paying has been since the Boston Cafeteria month, on the same day it was announced on the radio program which was merely a couple of day's late than the Boston Cafeteria's day.

----May 27th, 2018

05-26-2018 我父亲家里究竟有钱没钱？我所继承的究竟是什么钱？

05-26-2018 我父亲家里究竟有钱没钱？我所继承的究竟是什么钱？


听到说我父母家里从来就没有钱我却有财产继承还是很困扰。
我的回应：主要是因为我一直没有收到我的生活费用给付，就是由美国“Pejoves”基金公司从1967年7月我出生起起就一直有支付的那个每月一万美金的生活费用，就是广播剧提到的由福特控股的一个投资公司（“Pejoves”基金公司）支付的那个每月一万美金。

据说从1997年起，这每月一万元的福特控股支票是以我的名字“方敏(Min Fang)”作为支票支付原因。我当时已到美国生活也已经认识了一个福特先生，我听说这就是为什么福特先生们的恋爱关系女士都是各个扯着嗓门的在广播剧上说自己才是收到每月一万美金的生活费用那一个，不怕比。今天早上的那个听着有点闹吃醋的是个拉丁美洲裔女士，我听说是广播公司的高层，是一个福特夫人，她丈夫和我一点关联都没有，闹吃醋似的就是因为这个每月一万美金的原因。

1996年我来美国之前这钱都是付到中国的，从2007年起至2018年4月，我听说这每月一万美金是支付给了一个Jessica Petroves，据说就是现在在波士顿96.9FM上做节目的R夫人。我还是同样的想法，就是我用英语已经表达的，不管什么原因我没有收到一分钱的生活费给付，这每月的一万美金和我继承的信托规模根本没法比，我相信让我能够安全继承比收到这每月一万美金重要。经历过2004年我的继承日大花钱之后，我更是不会多想了。那一天加上投资在唱歌跳舞上的，我一共花了有40-50亿美金。就是这40亿到50亿美金的花销让很多人说我那天一定是花了洛克菲勒家的钱，其实不是，我从来都是在花我自己的钱。当时是有一些我想投资于唱歌跳舞的那些钱是被R家给“花了”，这也是为什么从广播剧上你们听到了洛克菲勒家族公司的一些非洛家血脉的机构投资公司代表所发出的“洛家族人把投资机会都给抢走了”的抱怨。

至于提到我父亲为什么没有财产继承，我不是太清楚，我所继承的不是遗产，是信托财产。我所有的爷爷们都是在我出生之前就已经去世，他们的遗产都是在他们去世前后就已经分给了他们自己下一代的子女。我收到的是我的一些爷爷们在世时帮我办理的信托，也就是特意留给我的一份礼物了。因为我爷爷们都已经去世，所以我是继承信托。如果我生下来时我爷爷方智仁还在，我就是接受了而不是继承了方智仁爷爷替我办理的信托。继承信托是指信托的受益人（我）是在作为财产赠与者的信托委托人（我爷爷）已经去世后才收到了我爷爷所信托的钱财，接收信托是指作为财产赠与者的信托委托人还在世时信托的受益人就已经收到所信托的钱财。

上海的方家亲眷是可以核实方智仁爷爷替我办理的香港信托的信息的（就是香港长江实业2004年所开具的五亿美金支票的故事）。我听说确实是在1949年10月前办理，有明确遗嘱。我收到的其他祖爷爷帮我办理的信托也是类似，我方敏都是信托遗嘱所指定的唯一受益人，我确实没有拿方家亲眷的任何钱财。

关于我所继承的信托在中国的一些投资产业及公司，我方敏和这些公司的关系，就像在股票市场买股票的投资人一样，只有我的信托作为投资机构的股利分红，但完全不牵涉公司业务经营及公司管理。我方敏是我方敏所继承所有信托的唯一受益人，我方敏所继承的所有信托都没有任何方家亲眷任何方家血脉的任何份额，方家亲眷方家血脉如果和这些在中国的公司之间有任何矛盾，都和我方敏无关；牵涉到我方敏的法律利益的，我方敏是报警处理。

至于我为什么没有收到每月一万美金的生活费用，传说很多。我父亲的那个“北京前女友”，就是把我妈妈的结婚礼物给拿走的那个，新的传说是她在南京大学时据说从未和我父亲谈过恋爱，但在大学就读期间曾有一次放暑假和我父亲同一趟火车去上海的经历，见识了我“一看就是大富豪”的爷爷方智仁穿着精致气派带着人来接火车，还听到了我爷爷方智仁抱怨我父亲不肯花一百多元坐飞机，浪费8个小时坐便宜火车，而我父亲强调他是当过兵的，听说坐飞机就给吓死。我父亲以前当过测绘兵。当时是1960年前后，据说当时上海飞机场的准确地标和飞机导航系统上的差了有一公里。那真是谁知道飞机会在哪儿降落啊，在广播剧里有提到过“只有测绘兵”当年一听说坐飞机就给吓死。

据说那个被我爷爷方智仁带着去接我父亲火车的，就是负责替我爷爷的朋友将国外送的礼物转给我妈妈的人， 听说是姓“于”。我估计这“北京前女友”是认识了这人。把我妈妈的结婚礼物拿走是至少6-7年以后的事了。据说她在广播剧上说她家1967年以后是每个月都有生活费可以拿，后来不知怎么就停了，我就回答说那是因为方智仁的孙女我没当过兵，坐了飞机一路冻得哆哆嗦嗦就飞到了美国。

----2018年5月26日。

05-25-2018 The impacts on me from the Family Story and the Produced Stories

05-25-2018 The impacts on me from the Family Story and the Produced Stories


Heard this morning's mention of the impact of the O'Connors' Confusion.
My response: Ya, I felt it too because I haven't received my rumored $400Million providing for the year 2016 yet.

I heard O'Connors are so confused because they have the family story that there had been over 30 years hard saving in order to invest in this American Fund Company

What I heard was there were two Mr. O'Connors (father &son) decided not to pick-up their attorney-fees no matter how they had been persuaded to, and Accounting Department of this company needed their signatures to complete the accounting procedure were the reasons that O'Connors has this family story.

So, I heard this O'Connors' family saying is true but this American Fund company has been 100% privately owned by its British investor in this entire time since it has been established 400 years ago. All of O'Connors saving plus the interest-incurred, together with the first year's agreed-upon providing, were given to the first Senator O'Connor. I heard this are all in records.

This Ameican Fund Company has been 100% privately owned by its British Investor Fund Company. The Trust I inherited in 2004 has been its investor through its upstream investing chain.

I am the sole beneficiary of the Trusts I inherited that any of my relatives don't have any share in any of my Trusts.

I have to clarify that any of my relatives don't have any investment in this American Fund Company's investments in China.

To this American Fund company and its British Investor Fund company, I am investor owner similar to a stockholder of a public listed company who receives yearly dividends but not part of its business operation nor its management. This is the same to all of its investments.

----May 25th, 2018


Heard this morning's talk about $400Million of the Pejoves name.
My response: I heard this $400 Million is my year 2017's living providing that paid out by the American "Pejoves" Fund company to the Treasure Department as decided on July 1st of 2004.

I used "Pejoves" name to identify this American Fund company but what I referred is actually a British family's name that associates with this American Fund company and its British Investor Fund company. This American Fund company is a great-grandchild investment of a Spanish Fund company through its British Investor.

I heard the Miss Pejoves featured in this morning's broadcasting is a Spanish lady, not a Hispanic, who works for the Treasury Department. Her name has the spelling and her family is from Spain are the reasons for this morning's featured joke.

Rumored this has been a produced story intended to take away the $400 Million paid-out providing.

----May 25th, 2018


Heard this morning's talk about my cohort study.
My response: I am an east coast online student registered at a west coast college who obviously has very limited social with local online students.

My current financial thrift situation is not a secret in Boston, Massachusetts where I am a resident of, and I am comfortable with this in the cohort class. Those "romance shits" on the radio have made me the well-known target of all kinds of gossips as well as severe sexual harassments, and I am not comfortable to be part of any gossip of any confused romances that I have nothing to do, are the reasons I will stay aloof in this cohort class at least for this semester.

I heard this morning's $60,000 was announced by a Miss Jessica "Pejoves". Well, I heard this announcer is a British-American female who adopted her last name from her birth mother. I heard she is the same Jessica "Pejoves" who is the announced mother of David Petraeus' child or children.

Both David Petraeus and Jessica "Pejoves" are none of my business people. As long as this announced $60,000 is not paid by my money, it is none of my business whatever this Miss Jessica "Pejoves" wishes to announce to pay. I heard this Jessica "Pejoves" was the female sitting at the table in college cafeteria rumors in Boston.

It is rumored this Miss Jessica "Pejoves" has deposited some of my major-featured-person fee-income from the radio company into her own bank account and paid tax in her name as well in 2016. I did call law enforcement's help on this rumor. I refuse to pay anything that David Petraeus or this Jessica "Pejoves" has announced.

----May 25th, 2018

05-24-2018 作为可能的继承人母亲处女身进了我家的门结婚，我的奶奶们没有一个是妓女收房的（All my grandmothers were married a virgin, none was a brought-in home-pussy)

05-24-2018 作为可能的继承人母亲处女身进了我家的门结婚，我的奶奶们没有一个是妓女收房的 (All my grandmothers were married a virgin, none was a brought-in home-pussy)


Heard Chinese government has been so confused if any of my grandmothers was a brought-in home-pussy, so I assume this may be the reason of so-supported home pussy's 
professional shit-throwing radio program (中文附后）.

My response: 
All my grandmothers were married a virgin. None of my grandmothers was a brought-in home-pussy.

Among Chinese dynasties, only Song dynasty and Ming dynasty were known for certain of their first-born son inheriting rule, all other dynasties in Chinese history have each's own inheriting rule that some of which are very certainly not the first-born son inheriting while others may not be the first-born son inheriting. 

My grandfathers were all born by decent virgin daughters from local officials or local squires. Only one of my grandmother was the first wife, all others were not is a true statement, but none of my grandmothers was concubine nor brought-in home-pussy. 

Being local officials or local squires, the reason that my grandmothers' maiden families willing to let their daughters marry my already married grandfathers with the handsome blessing from their maiden families, was because every one of my grandfathers was in for a decent polygamist marriage to have the heir of the family.

All my grandmothers were married a virgin, none was a brought-in home-pussy。


----May 24th, 2018



听说了中国政府对我世世代代的奶奶们是否是妓女被收房的很困扰，我估计就特意找了一堆的破鞋妓女在广播剧上进行所谓的收房妓女的专业谩骂打砸。
我的回应：

我的奶奶们都是处女嫁给我爷爷的。我的奶奶们都不是什么妓女收进门的。

中国古代的帝王朝代中，就只有明朝和宋朝确定是长子继承，中国历史上的其他朝代都是各有各的继承规则但都确定不是或者不一定是长子继承。我的爷爷们作为家里的继承人都是由处女结婚的乡绅官宦人家的女儿生出，我的奶奶们就只有一个是第一房妻子，其他都不是第一房妻子，但从来都不是偏房或者妓女收房。做为乡绅官宦人家的女儿，我的这些奶奶们的娘家愿意让他们的女儿带着娘家置办的不薄嫁妆嫁给我已婚的爷爷就是因为我爷爷们各个都是正正经经在娶妻生个继承人。

作为可能的继承人母亲处女身进了我家的门结婚，我的奶奶们没有一个是妓女收房的 .

----2018年5月24日。



Heard the confusion expressed this morning is the Chinese tradition of Firstborn Son Inheriting Custom.
My response: First Born Son inheriting is not the custom of Chinese Emperors' family.

West Han dynasty (西汉, 206BC - 8AD）, East Han dynasty（东汉, 25AD-220AD）, Tang dynasty（唐朝, 618AD - 907AD）, Yuan dynasty（元朝, originated from Genghis Khan， 1279AD-1368AD) and Qing dynasty（清朝, 1644AD-1911AD） were having own inheriting rules that were not according to the firstborn son inheriting custom, especially Tang dynasty, Yuan dynasty and Qing dynasty are well known not firstborn inheriting. I do not know if Yuan dynasty or Qing dynasty had female heir disguised in male's appearance to inherit. I am the female heir of Tang dynasty Emperors and I had a grandmother crowned herself a Wuzhou Empress with the support from her Tang dynasty Emperor husband's heir son (my grandfather). Her Emperor husband was Emperor Gaozong of Tang（唐高宗李治）

http://www.yutopian.com/history/

西漢 (West Han dynasty)
(1) 漢高祖 劉邦 (前206-前195) (my grandfather)
(2) 漢惠帝 劉盈 (前194-前188)
(3) 漢高后 呂雉(漢少帝 劉恭，漢少帝 劉弘) (前187-前180) (a wife)
(4) 漢文帝 劉恆 (前179-前157)（竇皇后）(a wife)
(5) 漢景帝 劉啟 (前156-前141)
(6) 漢武帝 劉徹 (前140-前87) (possibly my grandfather, 东汉的开国皇帝是光武帝)
(7) 漢昭帝 劉弗陵 (前86-前74)
(8) 漢宣帝 劉詢 (前73-前49)
(9) 漢元帝 劉爽 (前32-前7)
(10) 漢成帝 劉驁 (前32-前7)
(11) 漢哀帝 劉欣 (前6-前1)
(12) 漢平帝 劉衍 (1-5)
(13) 孺子 劉嬰 (6-8)

http://www.kmuh.org.tw/www/drgga/www/C.H/CH02.htm)

----January 9th, 2018

05-23-2018 请出示够资格向我索要钱财的法律条款及事实依据

05-23-2018 请出示够资格向我索要钱财的法律条款及事实依据



听说了今天早上提到得华裔社区及华人观点“我和你一点关联都没有，你有钱为什么就不可以给？”
我的回应：
没有任何关联是我方敏没有亏欠你任何人情债金钱债的最好证据，所以我对你既没有任何法律上的责任义务，也没有任何道义情感上的亏欠，我方敏不乐意给你一分一厘我自己的钱。

也就是说作为美国公民，我方敏的钱是按照美国法律界定为我方敏自己合法拥有的钱财，只要我方敏没有美国法律所界定的法律责任义务必须给你钱，我方敏就是不乐意给你一分一厘。我方敏来自中国，2015年6月前曾是中华人民共和国的公民，只要我方敏没有中国法律所界定的法律责任义务必须给你钱，我方敏也还是不乐意给你一分一厘。

对于坚持以编造故事或者将他人故事予以剪辑的手段对我方敏栽赃造谣诽谤以混淆大众视听进行讹诈钱财骚扰恐吓敲诈勒索的人员及行为，我方敏誓言按照中国法律美国法律捍卫我方敏的一切合法权益。

任何够资格在大众广播频道上扯着嗓门向我要钱的人：
1：请出示我方敏必须承担法律责任义务必须抚养你及你家人的事实依据及法律条款依据（中国法律和美国法律）。
2：请出示我方敏必须承担法律责任义务必须瞻养你及你家人的事实依据及法律条款依据（中国法律和美国法律）。
3：请出示我方敏必须承担法律责任义务必须偿还对你及你的家人所欠债务的事实依据及法律条款依据（中国法律和美国法律）。
4： 请出示我方敏必须按照中国法律和美国法律必须归还本应由你及你的家人予以继承的财产的事实依据及法律条款依据（中国法律和美国法律）。

5：请注意，按照中国法律和美国法律对财产继承的定义，继承从被继承人死亡时开始，而不是因为财产赠予人和财产受益人之间的性交关系是否还存在。我方敏所继承的是信托，我去世的爷爷生前是委托人，立有遗嘱，我是唯一受益人，继承及受益方式由遗嘱信托文件规定。请参阅下附信托继承相关资讯。
6： 请回答为何不上民事诉讼法庭解决所有这些民事法庭上就可以依据法律解决的金钱纠纷?我方敏的态度是一定会追究这种坚决不上民事法庭却通过恶意制造负面社会舆论对我方敏实施敲诈勒索的行为的刑事责任。


----2018年5月23日。


信托继承相关资讯：

信託（英语：Trust）是一個三方託付的關係。第一方為信托人，轉移財產（一般為金錢，但必須是金錢）至第二方（受託人），使得第三方（受益人）獲得利益。^[1]
（ 信托----维基百科 ）


中国信托法

第二条    本法所称信托，是指委托人基于对受托人的信任，将其财产权委托给受托人，由受托人按委托人的意愿以自己的名义，为受益人的利益或者特定目的，进行管理或者处分的行为。

第七条    设立信托，必须有确定的信托财产，并且该信托财产必须是委托人合法所有的财产。
 第八条    设立信托，应当采取书面形式。
        书面形式包括信托合同、遗嘱或者法律、行政法规规定的其他书面文件等。

第十三条    设立遗嘱信托，应当遵守继承法关于遗嘱的规定。
        遗嘱指定的人拒绝或者无能力担任受托人的，由受益人另行选任受托人；受益人为无民事行为能力人或者限制民事行为能力人的，依法由其监护人代行选任。遗嘱对选任受托人另有规定的，从其规定。

第十五条    信托财产与委托人未设立信托的其他财产相区别。设立信托后，委托人死亡或者依法解散、被依法撤销、被宣告破产时，委托人是唯一受益人的，信托终止，信托财产作为其遗产或者清算财产；委托人不是唯一受益人的，信托存续，信托财产不作为其遗产或者清算财产；但作为共同受益人的委托人死亡或者依法解散、被依法撤销、被宣告破产时，其信托受益权作为其遗产或者清算财产。

第四十三条    受益人是在信托中享有信托受益权的人。受益人可以是自然人、法人或者依法成立的其他组织。
        
第四十四条    受益人自信托生效之日起享有信托受益权。信托文件另有规定的，从其规定。

（中华人民共和国信托法： 中华人民共和国信托法 ）


中国继承法：

第二条    继承从被继承人死亡时开始。
第三条    遗产是公民死亡时遗留的个人合法财产。
第五条    继承开始后，按照法定继承办理；有遗嘱的，按照遗嘱继承或者遗赠办理；有遗赠扶养协议的，按照协议办理。
( 中华人民共和国继承法 中华人民共和国继承法 )

----2018年5月23日。

05-22-2018 I am a Female and I have no willingness to pay for another female's sexuality

05-22-2018 I am a Female and I have no willingness to pay for another female's sexuality


Heard this morning's broadcasting of the Vietnamese Anh's story again.
My response: This morning's broadcasting certainly is demonstrating if a decision is purely based on willingness, then this decision can be expected to be changed. 

The Vietnamese Anh's story is so unique and worthy to be featured is that this Vietnamese Anh is a College Cafeteria's famously unwanted story in Boston, MA just several years ago, and now she is the proud of a rich man's hard to get the wish-come-true story. This intended theme of this morning's featured story may be the reason for the confusion if that is the same rich man.

Well, it is the same or a different rich male is totally none of my business. My only concern is whose money actually is the paying account. I heard a male has announced his willingness to pay to let his family enjoy life as his family wish, but I already had some bad experiences that all these kind of announced spending's actual paying account is rumored from my $4.5Billion income as a major featured person.

I totally against this broadcasting theme to imply if giving me endlessly enough time and put me under the condition of no-chance-not-to-bent, my refusal to give out my money can be changed with the joint efforts. I accuse this kind of efforts is armed kidnapping.

I came from a long history polygamist family as a female heir with the expectation of a male's privilege in marriage if I have a polygamist's marriages,  and I have no moral issue with whoever's wish to live their romance life the way as announced this morning.

My only anxiety is if that is my cash again or why my money? It is purely because I am a Female and I have no willingness to pay for another female's sexuality, and it is also because I came from the culture that no tolerance on overlappings among polygamists' marriages.

Also, I came from China that I heard enough how an honorable-name can mean nothing if I just wait for the never-going-to-happen-paying-back of my own money. So, I did ask Law enforcement's help and expressed myself that I have no willingness to be abducted in Poverty nor wish to be washed-clean by rich names own malicious abusiveness towards their own names.

I have this doubt all this time that why the Chinese government's strong supporting voices are in this sort of the broadcasting theme of Mistress Proud To be Paid For Sex parade?

The People's Republic of China is known for how its ruling government determined to against Corruptions which includes corruption of taking its central reserve's money or corruptions of keeping a Mistress in a marriage ever since the 1949 establishment by the Chinese Communist Party.

Why this shouting to support this morning's efforts of making a Marriage with a Mistress a public known acknowledgment is actually from the current administration of the People's Republic of China that is still completely governed by the Chinese Communist Party? Is China really governed by the rumored "Brothel administration" currently?

05-20-2018 Why I say "I refuse you abuse my money, I refuse you steal my money, and I refuse you publicly rob my money"?


----May 22nd, 2018

05-21-2018 I would listen to what my father says and On different proud in a team of a successfully implemented project（我会听我父亲方文海怎么说）

05-21-2018 I would listen to what my father says and On different proud in a team of a successfully implemented project （我会听我父亲方文海怎么说）

Heard this morning's talk about my father （中文附后）.
My response: My father was pushed out of a moving vehicle after he was invited into the chauffeured Chinese Premier Li's office's equipped-car was a complaint I filed to the People's Republic of China's Government via an email to Chinese Consulate New York.

What I heard was my father was invited to share a ride in Nanjing City by the Chinese Premier Li. There was a female on the other side of the Chinese Premier Li who was very agitated and initiated push. I heard her agitation was because of my inheriting, her maiden name is my same last name and from same hometown origin of Nibo City , but I am not certain if she has any blood association with me or she is the same branch of the " the real Zu's family heir" who has the Fang last name who has no blood association with me at all (only 79% similarity from DNA test).

I heard it was a hard fall that my father couldn't get up immediately but he did not say anything either.  I would definitely ask and would listen to what my father says about what happened and what else.

Attached at the end of this blog is the letter I sent to Chinese Consulate New York.

----May 21st, 2018

Heard this morning's talk about being a creative person.
My response: In a movie-making project, a creator is different with script-writer, producer or director, not to mention the movie-making crew.

In a technology related project, other than each project's team member definitely has a different assignment on own specialty that the successful implementation of the project would bring out a totally different proud from another team member which obviously not on each other's toes, the proud of making a successful project is also different among the project's leaders.

A project initiator who normally is a business person.
A project leader who has to be a technology background and technological enough.
A project coordinator who may be a technology person, or a business person, or an administrative person.

Obviously, the proud of implementing a successful project is not going to be on each other's toes for the entire technology project personnel.

For a business related or a social related project, a local community project or statewide project, from the human resource perspective, a firm sized big is the same as a region sized big. All need some project members, as a group or as an individual, who has a different assignment but work together on a different aspect of the same project. These team members as the group or an individual who got different assignments, certainly don't step on each other's toes on their contribution to the success of the project, some fights may exist in the same group who has the same assignment.

Example for this would be me and the Viagra(blue) research team on our contribution to it. Nobody needs to argue what I contributed which was how much research time plus research money I contributed to saving, but there may be tons of arguments on who contributed more to research academically among its research team members.

The project team leaders of a business project or a social project would be similar.

A project initiator who may be a representative of a community, a community leader or state leader, or a commoner who has a great idea that these leaders agreed.

A project leader, who has the professional knowledge of the business or the true understanding of what the community needs that can prioritize and organize the project resources, and also has the capabilities to manage the project team. This person may be a business leader, a community leader, or assigned by a business leader or a community leader.

A project coordinator, who most likely is a business leader, a community leader or even a state leader.

Well, obviously, the proud shared among these business project or social project leaders shouldn't be the same and shouldn't be on each other's toes.

----May 21st, 2018


听说了今天早上提到了我的父亲。
我的回应：我父亲是被中国总理李克强在南京邀请而上了李克强总理的的公务小轿车上之后又被从已经启动的车里推出去是我通过中国驻纽约领事馆向中华人民共和国政府的投诉。

我听说的是我的父亲在南京被中国的李克强总理邀请才上的李克强总理的小轿车。 在中国总理的另一边坐着一个女的，那女的情绪很激动，最早开始推推搡搡的就是那个女的。我听说那女的很情绪是因为我方敏继承财产的事，她娘家姓方也是宁波镇海人，但我不清楚她和我是否有血缘关系或者和那个姓方的“明朝朱家的真正大少爷”是同一支的。那个广播上播出的方姓“明朝朱家的真正大少爷”也是宁波镇海人，但和我是一点血缘关系都没有 （DNA鉴定结果只有70%左右的相似度）。

我听说的是我父亲摔倒在地时摔的很重，不是一下子就可以爬起来的，但他摔倒当时没说什么。至于当时究竟怎么回事以及是否还有其它的经历，我是一定会问，也一定会听我父亲方文海的说法。

附后的就是我当时寄给中国纽约领事馆的投诉原信（9成5是原信）。

----2018年5月21日。



----------------------------------------------

方敏：回应父亲方文海的寻人启事
M F Tue, Jan 16, 2018, at 12:13 PM
To: 纽约中领管侨务

你好，

更多一些我听说的我弟弟婚姻家庭和我父亲的矛盾，请你们调查。

1： 我弟弟的婚姻注册妻子与中国总理李克强有性关系，据说是拉上窗帘但房门打开方式，就在女方的娘家居住地附近。

 2： 我父亲现在是失踪，而且我父亲是人所共知的没有发生任何财产继承的一个。我父亲所有的全部 就是他自己买的那一套房子以及他被从那房子里赶出去时没能带出来的全部积蓄。我父亲从被从自 己家里赶出来的那一天起，就是靠他那每个月发放的退休金生活着。
（我是在这信发出之后才听说2013年10月起我父亲的户籍被注销死亡，退休金停止发放----05/21/2018）

3：我听说的是：我父亲就是在南京的北京东路上，就是在大白天，就是在天文台宿舍大院的前面被 公然推出已经启动的汽车而当众摔倒在地的，就在我父亲好不容易从地上站起来回到家里的同一天 （或者第三天），就收到他儿子的老婆递上的装着我父亲身份证件的小塑料袋并被告知永远别回来 了。我2015年一月打电话回家时, 我被那女的告知的是我父亲已经走了。

4： 我的父亲是被人拖着上的小轿车，再被人从已启动的车里给推出去，那人是看见我父亲摔倒在地, 没等我父亲能够站起来，就轻轻松松扬长而去的。但我没听说是什么时间。

此致，
谢谢
方敏

---------------------------------

05-20-2018 Why I say "I refuse you abuse my money, I refuse you steal my money, and I refuse you publicly rob my money" ?

05-20-2018 Why I say "I refuse you abuse my money, I refuse you steal my money, and I refuse you publicly rob my money"?


Heard this morning's broadcasting of "Rockefeller Investor Group"
My response: Why I say "I refuse you abuse my money, I refuse you steal my money, and I refuse you publicly rob my money" this morning?

First of all, this morning's is the newly formed, as you heard on the radio a couple of months ago, "the Rockefeller 100% Chinese Only Investor Group".

Second of all, that $400 Million is my income from my Trust (investment income or dividend income ) that I withdraw to cover my living expenses. No reason for me to live on a welfare standard (housing project, food stamp, no cash assistance) in order to invest this money.

Third of all, this $400Million had paid $400,000 per month service charge for consecutive 12 months to the same place but the different office and paid investor tax for the same paying year.

Fourth of all, I had bad experience since 2015 that there were so many males I never even heard of had shouted on the radio program that he never wanted me, followed by a female' announcing herself a true love to that him, and rumored, followed by Albert Gore's arranged announcements to have some of my intellectual incomes which actually transacted on the same day after each broadcasting without me even need to hear about it. This was when I was frantically searching where is my money because I was living on Massachusetts' welfare. I have been constantly calling laws help since.

Fifth of all, I am allergic to R's name associated romances is because with the full house shitting me on the radio, my $3Billion income of being the major featured person from radio program (2005-2012) was taken by announced R's romances in the mid of 2016 and rumored, another $1.5 Billion in 2017. With each full-housed shit spelled at me that followed by who might be the real deal romance announced, I have built up the anxiety to call law's help to find out whose money would cover this or that romance's really wanted "own financial security" while I am living on Massachusetts' welfare.

I know the Rockefellers' names, at least some, are decent names from this experience, and I really don't know anything at all, but I did develop some allergy about "handling my affair" from the Rockefellers' names associated. I did refuse to let the Rockefeller Investor Group handle my money.

I do have my own inherited wealth that I have my own independent attorneys and accountants groups who have been handling my investments all these time, before and after my inheriting in 2004, is the reason I really do not need any of Rockefellers' romances to handle any of my own financial matters.

I am not responsible nor obligated to provide the financial security feeling for anyone of Rockefellers' romances. I am not willing nor privileged to spoil anyone of Rockefellers' romances.

I am upset, not because I don't take Rockefeller a decent name, but the reality I can't have access to my own providing because all my cash providing and all my intellectual incomes have been in this similar situation no matter how many situations have been taken care of by the decent ones.

----May 20th, 2018

05-19-2018 Boston's Chinese Supermarket C-Mart and Residential Kensington Palace (波士顿的中国超市和肯辛顿宫居民楼）

05-19-2018 Boston's Chinese Supermarket C-Mart and Residential Kensington Palace (波士顿的中国超市和肯辛顿宫居民楼） 


Heard this morning's broadcasting of Chinese Supermarket C-Mart in Boston City（中文附后）.
My response: Most likely, all four were on the conference call on July 1st of 2004. Plus, there were other from another major Boston Chinese Supermarket, a joint-venture with C-mart (平价超市). I can imagine what was the shock when they were informed I am such a "fake" right after that conference by Chinese Foreign Department. But another C-Mart's joint venture "Jiahe Supermarket"（家和) did open in 2012 or so as well-expected after 2004, at the corner near the same famously expected newly-built "Kensington Palace（肯辛顿宫）" residential building.

They were the people might even have seen me counting my fingers and how I was interrupted "Is that 5 enough (male underwears)? by Chinese diplomats, and how I obviously not satisfied by only 5 fingers. Well, what happened was I was counting which grandfather in China, from how many generations ago, had blessed me this handsomeness locally in the United States. So far, the American Fund company has been operating on the America soil for 400 years already, 5 generation only covered about 200 years. Obviously, 5 fingers were not satisfying enough.

Yes, I heard this American "Pejoves" Fund is a co-investor of these Chinese supermarkets was the reason a Miss Jessica Pejoves told them I was never a Ford woman this morning. This is the Fund has been paying my $10,000 a month providing upon its British Investor's instruction since I was born in July of 1967. My father-side eldest cousin was born in the mid of 1964, and my younger brother was born in the mid of February of 1969 were the reasons of this morning's broadcasting of July of 1964, June of 1967 and January of 1969's accounting record of this monthly payment.

It has been smooth whenever I went grocery shopping in the past, so, I am not concerned what it will be like after this morning's broadcasting those yellings from the four brothers who own the majority of C-Mart supermarket chain: "I hate this Chinese woman Min Fang in Boston's local Roxbury area."

Also, it was mentioned on July 1st of 2004 that my first cousin would be in "Jiahe Supermarket" to learn to run his own company. He has been in the grocery business since 1992 or so and has a very successful career as an independent agent representing some big foreign investors in Shanghai were the reasons for that conversation. That discussion never meant to make him a CEO or the Investor Owner of "Jiahe Supermarket" but sort of a "visiting trainee".

I currently seldom go grocery shopping is because of my health, I still feel tired and need to lie down often. And I seldom go luncheon out because of the same reason. I often make do with porridge and throw-in some meat and vegetable. Ya, I need to pay attention to my nutrition. And I am still on Food Stamps.😃


----May 19th, 2018



听说了今天早上播出的波城中国超市。
我的回应：很可能这四个都是在2004年7月1日的电话会议上的，当时还有一些是波士顿另外一个主要的华人超市平价超市的，现在也是由这个中国超市合伙的。我能够想象那天电话会议刚一开完就被中国外交部工作人员通知说我是“最大的假冒伪造”是怎样的一份震惊。不过呐，这个中国超市合资的“家和超市”是在2012年底左右在波士顿华裔社区的广泛关注之下，就如2004年7月1日开会时所讨论的一样，在预期的地点（同样广为关注的新建的肯辛顿宫居民楼对面）开张营业。

他们有可能还亲眼看见了我在数手指时是如何被中国外交部吓阻，问我“5个(男裤档）够不够啊？”， 而我还真是明显一副意犹未竟的态度。我的解释：当时是我在数一数究竟可能是由我的哪一代远在中国的爷爷能够给我这么一份在美国当地的丰厚投资。现在知道了，这个美国基金公司在美国这片土地上营运都已经有400多年了。5个手指头就只有5代爷爷最多也就200年左右啊，很明显是不够的。

对，我听说了美国“Pejoves”基金公司是这些中国超市的投资人之一，这是为什么这家的一个小姐Jessica Pejoves 今天早上会对这几个中国超市老板说我从来就不是什么福特的女人。就是这家美国Pejoves基金公司按照其上级英国投资公司的指示从我1967年出生就每月支付我一万美金的生活费用。我父系的大表哥是1964年的年中出生的，我弟弟是1969年2月中旬才出生是今天早上播出这每月一万美金生活费未在1964年7月及1967年6月支出而在1969年1月就已经有该支出财务记录存在的原因。

过去我去这些中国超市买东西都还平顺，所以就算今天早上是这中国超市最大股东的东家四兄弟在广播上吼叫着“我恨死这个居住波士顿地区Roxbury市区的中国女人方敏。”，我也不是太担心如何去这些超市采买中国食材。

还有啊，2004年7月1日的会上提到过我父亲大妹妹家的小孩想自己开个公司要去家和超市学一学。他是从1992年左右就已经做外企的进出口杂货小商品生意了，当时已经是在做外商在上海的独立生意代理了，做得很好是他希望如果有机会就自己做进出口贸易而引发那番谈话的原因。那番谈话从来不是说他要去家和超市当个老板或者当个总经理，而是去家和超市做个“短期见习生”的这种。

我现在很少去超市，午餐外食也很少，都是因为健康原因，我现在还是经常会觉得很累很需要躺一躺。我现在也就是经常煮个粥扔点肉菜进去混一混。是啊，我真是得注意一下自己营养。我现在还是在用粮食卷采买。

----2018年5月19日。

05-18-2018 Radio Program Producing is not Judicial Justicing (制作广播剧不是在进行司法上的裁决）

05-18-2018 Radio Program Producing is not Judicial Justicing (制作广播剧不是在进行司法上的裁决）


Heard this morning's talk about a "Chinese delivery guy" Peter （中文附后）.
My response: I had not even attempted to contact this "Chinese delivery guy" Peter since the year of 2001 or 2002, which is after I was told by a Miss Li, who picked up his apartment's phone I called, that she already moved into his apartment as his romance.

I knew nothing about his life or his life experience since 2001. I am not obligated, nor interested to know anything about this "Chinese delivery guy" Peter at all. I am not obligated nor responsible for anything about his life or his interest.

If anyone concerned about this featured story in this morning's broadcasting, please contact the LAW enforcement.

----May 18th, 2018


Heard this moring's talk about the "radio-program-announced ruling".
My response: I heard that those rulings announced on the radio program were announced by the  Judge-licensed, but do not have the court ruling sequential number of the year from the Court that announcing Judge belongs, nor related court-records number, nor related case name or number as part of the court's records keeping references from the Court that announcing Judge belongs. I heard there is no court record at all for all those radio-program-announced rulings.

----May 18th, 2018


听说了今天早上提到的“外卖小弟大脚”。
我的回应：从2001年或2002年我被一位自我介绍为李小姐的接听由我拨通的这个“外卖小弟大脚”的住宅电话，并被告知她自己是这个“外卖小弟大脚”当时已经同居的女友后，就再未试图和这个”外卖小弟大脚“取得任何联系。

从2001年起，我方敏就完全不清楚这个“外卖小弟大脚”的生活状况或者人生经历。我方敏没有任何责任也没有任何兴趣知道这个“外卖小弟大脚”的任何事情。对于这个“外卖小弟大脚”的人生及他生活的各个方面，我方敏没有任何责任也没有任何义务。

如果有任何人对今天的广播剧播出所涉及的该内容有点疑虑，请向警方举报。

----2018年5月18日。


听说了今天早上谈的“广播剧上所宣布的法庭判决”。
我的回应：我听说的是：那些广播剧上所宣布的法庭判决都是由持有有效法官执照的人所宣布的，但这些判决都没有在那些广播剧上宣布裁决的法官所属法院的该年度该法院该法庭判决的序号，没有该法庭判决的相关档案号，也没有该法庭判决的相关诉讼案的名称或号码，以作为宣布裁决的法官所属法院已存档的该法院已审理诉讼案的法庭判决的档案索引。我听说根本就没有一个美国司法部的法院有任何这些广播剧所宣布的法庭判决的存档记录。

----2018年5月18日。

05-17-2018 I have been provided for $10,000 per month since I was born (从我出生开始就有每月一万美金的生活费用给付）

05-17-2018 I have been provided for $10,000 per month since I was born (从我出生开始就有每月一万美金的生活费用给付）


Heard about this morning's mention of I have been provided for since I was born.
My response: I heard this morning's talk of $10,000 monthly providing since I was born in July of 1967 that paid by the American "Pejoves" Fund Company upon its investor British Fund Company's instruction.

It is true my parents and I only heard of this today. I know it is very handsome size even in the United States, not to mention how handsome it was at the time when my parents only got the joint income of ￥45/month in China in 1967. The exchange rate was one to one till 1980 or so.

Looking back, I don't know a lot why I had not received a penny but I knew I grew up with affluent food (may have received some subsidy on food 😋), good shooling, best college and education I wanted, and easy childhood growing up. My parents and my younger brother had not got affluent food as much as I got and my parents had to worry about how to make the ends meet each month may be the impacts I can think of regarding I hadn't received a penny of this handsome monthly providing.

Compare to the handsome blessing I inherited, the American Fund Company itself is about $400 Billion and the British Fund Company is even bigger, this $10,000 per month is not the size would make me itching even I fully aware what this $10,000 per month means in my childhood time in China. Plus, after I heard some historic stories that already called "tradition" in Britain, I really have no reason to complain at all why this $10,000 dollar had been spent all these years knowing I hadn't received any. I heard the paying to China had stopped soon after I left China in 1996.

Regarding what happened to this $10,000 per month providing, I don't know anything beyond my mother hadn't received her wedding gift yet which was given before I was even conceived. If I received this $10,000 dollar monthly providing, I would be raised by my birth parents but provided by my ancient birth grandfather instead of raised by my birth parents' own hard-earned salaries.

By the way, the Trust invested in this American "Pejoves" Fund company was set up for me by my ancient grandfather who was already in hometown Nanjing city a thousand years ago, the second Emperor of Southern Tang Li, Jing (南唐中主李璟 即 南唐元宗 916－961年8月12日， https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%9D%8E%E7%92%9F/29096 ). My mother had been telling me ever since I was little that I am a premature-born, my due-birthday was August 4th of 1967 or so.

----May 17th, 2018


听说了今天早上谈的我生下来就有给付养育费用。
我的回应：我听说今天早上提到我1967年7月生下来就有每月一万美金的养育费用,由美国的Pejoves基金公司按照其上级英国投资公司指示支付。

我和我的父母确实都是今天才听说这事，我很清楚这每月一万美金的生活费用在如今的美国都是很富足，更不用说在我小时候的当年，那时我父母每月加起来就只有￥45元人民币（1967年）收入。1980年代以前，人民币美元的汇率好像一直都是1：1。

现在回头看，我不清楚我为什么一分钱都没收到，但我知道我从小到大都吃得很舒服（估计有收到些食物补贴😋），学校也挺好，大学是中国最好的医学院之一也是我想要的专业教育，从小到大也都平平顺顺。我父母和我弟弟没有能够象我一样吃得很舒服，我的父母是月月都为钱不够用发愁，这些可能也就是我没有收到这每月一万美金生活费所受到的影响了。

我所继承的信托所投资的这个美国基金公司就有大概$400Billion 的规模，其上级英国基金公司规模还要大。和我所继承的信托规模相比，就算我很清楚这没有收到的每月一万美金会让我在当年贫瘠中国的童年富足很多到什么样的幸福程度，这金额都不是会让我心疼肝疼肺都疼的一笔支出。再说了，在我听说了一些历史真实都已经在英国被称为“传统”了，我更是没有任何理由抱怨为什么明知我一分钱都没收到还继续支付这每月的一万美金。我听说在我1996年离开中国后不久就已经停止了这每月的一万美金对中国方面的支付。

至于这每月一万美金的钱去了哪里，我还真是什么都不知道。/我就知道我母亲到现在都还没收到过她的那份结婚礼物，那可是在我母亲结婚怀上我之前就已经送出来了。我要是收到了这每月的一万美金，我就是由我的亲生父母养大但由我的祖爷爷支付生活费用保姆费用房租费用等等，而不是像现在这样是由我的亲生父母用他们自己挣的工资辛苦把我养大。

顺便提一句，那个投资于美国“Pejoves”基金公司的信托是由我那个1000年前就已经在江苏南京（金陵）的祖爷爷南唐中主李璟为我设立的（南唐中主李璟 即 南唐元宗 916－961年8月12日， https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E6%9D%8E%E7%92%9F/29096 ）。从小我妈就告诉我，我是个早产儿，预产期应该是1967年的8月4日左右。

----2018年5月17日。

05-16-2018 Investor Ownership can only be by LAWs, never by some published arguments

05-16-2018 Investor Ownership can only be by LAWs, never by some published arguments


Heard this morning's "the husband shares the wife's children with his mother-side cousin biologically".
My response: I heard this conclusion is drawn from the arguments, confrontation and frustrated verbal fights among the Chinese producers and their invited guests.

I just can't stop laughing because I also heard over a year ago that this same wife mother all her husband's children are the facts that factually supported by physical DNA test results conducted by the trustworthy groups and tons of curious groups.

----May 16th, 2018

Heard this morning's talk of the O'Connors confusion.
My response: I heard the real reason to produce the two pieces of the O'Connor confusion and above "clarification through arguments" together to broadcast is to "turn over the case" of who owns that American Fund that I call "O'Connors' confusion." I heard the efforts are from the Chinese producing team. "The CEO since 2011" is a Chinese as you heard from broadcasted clarification later in this morning's same episode.

Somehow, it was understood in China and Chinese Communities abroad that I have some investment in that American Fund via its investing chain is only a "truth of the arguments" through an episode broadcasted several months ago.

By factual & physical company legal registration, by its factual & physical tax-paying history, and by the company's factual & physical internal records, this American Fund company (I call O'Connors Confusion) is lawfully owned 100% by its British Investor Company since it was founded around the year of 1600AD. A Trust I inherited lawfully has some investment in the American Fund company via its investing chain. Investor Ownership can only be by LAWs, never by some published arguments.

I share the same frustration of this "announce to own" misunderstanding regarding the anger expressed by the government of the People's Republic of China and Chinese communities abroad towards confusion how I can have wealth really owned by me as inherited, in reality, only by me declared I am the heir of an ancient Chinese Emperor without any credible physical evidence.

Well, I have explained a lot about this already. I am the heir of an ancient Chinese Emperor is by the fact I have this Emperor's famous inheriting birthmarks physically and biologically on both of my father's hands and both of my own hands, and by the fact I inherited the Trust set up for me by the known Emperor heir of this ancient Chinese Emperor on June 30th of 2004.

I inherited this Trust because I am my father's daughter who has this family birthmark and my father's name is listed as the beneficiary person's father-by in the entrusting legal documents together with all my ancestor grandfathers from this known Emperor heir of this ancient Chinese Emperor.

That American Fund's ownership is not decided by any arguments, broadcasted or not broadcasted, but by LAWs. That broadcasted piece is announced by the O'Connors family as the guided exposures of the true O'Connors' confusion. The confusion of O'Connors family and my anxiety over this O'Connors' confusion have impacted the American Fund company in a lot of ways which includes the rumors of over 400 employees (40% of all its staff) have been laid off from that company since 2013.

By factual & physical company legal registration, by its factual & physical tax-paying history, and by the company's factual & physical internal records, this American Fund company (I call O'Connors Confusion) is lawfully owned 100% by its British Investor Company since it was founded around the year of 1600AD.

A Trust I inherited lawfully has some investment in the American company via its investing chain.

----May 16th, 2018

05-15-2018 If I owe money? should be a case of a lawfully valid Judicial Court, instead of being the reason to build public hate and hostility through public channel broadcasting

05-15-2018 If I owe money? should be a case of a lawfully valid Judicial Court, instead of being the reason to build public hate and hostility through public channel broadcasting
（我是否欠钱？应该是一个司法上有效的法庭诉讼案子，而不是通过大众广播频道制造仇恨和敌意的原因）



Regarding today's title （中文附后）
My response: My understanding, there are tons of confusion if I earned my intellectual incomes or if I indeed have inherited some money or why I am the only one in the family who got the money that may have caused a lot of public confusion, but the public confusion should be broadcasted by the guidance of laws to report and to clarify the confusion instead of mounting these "why not give out money"complaints & frustrations only, and via a public channel's broadcasting, in order to demand money without any legal grounds and to arouse public anger and hostility against my refusal of all these ridiculous and illegal demands of financial arrangement that I call Extortion efforts.

----May 15th, 2018


Heard of this morning's broadcasting about another orphan.
My response: What I heard earlier was that Chinese producing team has prepared 6 female orphans to demand the acknowledgment of birth daughter relationship and to demand financial arrangement as a birth daughter acknowledged. I heard radio program has already broadcasted 2-3 orphans' such demands. I am not certain if this morning's broadcasting is the fourth orphan or one of the already broadcasted. All my life till today, I have not yet been pregnant yet.

The orphan who I have mentioned in my web blog that may be a birth daughter to He, Guoqiang ( from the Shanghai Communism Youth Party), I heard she is a Chinese Communist party member, born in the year of 1989-1990. Her mother was a resident of Chongmin before her mother entered college, I heard her mother had been a resident of Shanghai city after college graduation and came to the United States and had well-known worked in restaurants since mid of the 1990s. All above is what I have heard of and have mentioned on my web blog. To sue my web blog conducted name-harm to He, Guoqiang's name, etc. using this morning's broadcasting materials will be understood as bilking.

----May 15th, 2018

Heard this morning's broadcasting of "No Money & No Property is painful, how dare Min Fang refused to give out Min Fang's own money?"
My response: What I inherited according to my several generations grandfathers' wills are Trusts that my grandfathers specially set up for me, which are the gifts to me from these grandfathers before their deaths. What I have inherited are never family wealth that left behind by my grandfathers at their death. My closest grandfather who fathered my father died in 1965 which was 2 years before I was born. Ever since I was born till I was college graduated, I was raised and had been provided by my own parents' on their own salaries.

According to Laws, the United States' Laws as well as the People's Republic of China's Laws, to those who I have no obligation nor responsibility to raise, nor to take care of education & medical expenses, nor to shelter with housing & senior care, I have no obligation nor responsibility to provide financial arrangement to pay for housing, nor living, nor education, nor medical, nor senior-care expenses. I have no obligation nor responsibility to provide financial arrangement means I refuse to give out my money.

If anyone deserves to have my money, I expect that person to provide lawful pieces of evidence of why I owe & how much I owe to the lawfully valid judicial Courts.

----May 15th, 2018



有关今天的标题
我的回应：我的理解是：对于我方敏是否有自己挣到的智慧产权收入，是否有继承财产以及我家怎么就只有我一个人有钱继承等等，是有可能造成了很多社会困扰，但对于这些有关社会公众困扰的播出应该是在法律的规范下进行的报道和澄清，而不是通过制作播出广播节目来单方面堆积那些没有任何法律依据的“凭什么就是不给钱”的抱怨和愤怒而不给与任何法律上的疏导和解释，就因为我方敏竟然敢公开拒绝这些被我称为敲诈勒索的无理要求，而引发制造社会大众针对我方敏的愤怒敌意和仇恨，

----2018年5月15日


听说了今天早上又播出了一个孤儿。
我的回应：我以前听说的是广播剧中国制作团队准备了6个女孤儿就是要来美国认亲妈要钱，今天之前已经播出的有2-3个。不知今天是第四个那还是以前已播出的那2-3个中的一个。我方敏从出生至今从未怀过孕。

我在以前的博文里提到的那个有可能是贺国强（上海共青团小贺）的亲生女儿的那个孤儿，据说是个党员，1989-1990年间出生，她母亲是上大学前住在上海崇明，据说毕业以后就已经留在上海，90年代中期就在美国，很多在美国做过餐馆的都听说过。以上是我所听说的并在我博客里提到过的那一个孤儿。用今天早上的播出内容上法庭打官司告我的博文伤害了贺国强名誉等等会被理解成为讹诈的。

----2018年5月15日

听说了今天早上提到的有关“没房没钱很痛苦，凭什么方敏就是不给钱”。
我的回应：我按照爷爷遗嘱所继承的是各代的爷爷们特别为我设立的信托，也就是我是按照各代的爷爷们各自的愿望收到了爷爷们生前给我留下的礼物。我所继承的从来就不是我的任何一个爷爷死后留下的家产。我最近的一个爷爷即我父亲的父亲也是在我1967年出生的2年前的1965年就已经去世了。我从出生开始就都是由我父亲方文海我母亲王博贤用他们自己的工资由他们自己亲手带大。

按照法律，对于一些我方敏没有任何法律道义上的责任义务必须提供抚养教育医药养老等各项费用的各方人士，我方敏也没有任何法律道义上的责任义务提供每月生活学习医疗照顾费用及住房养老安置。我方敏没有任何法律道义上的责任义务给钱也就是我方敏不会给钱。

如果有任何人认为我就是应该给钱，这人必须提供法律上有效的依据向司法机关（法庭）呈现我如何欠了这人钱以及欠了这人多少钱。

----2018年5月15日

05-14-2018 Heard this morning's broadcasting of the car accident.

05-14-2018 Heard this morning's broadcasting of the car accident.


Heard this morning's broadcasting of the car accident.
My response: I have heard the saying that this Fund shares the same great grand or the grand investor Fund of the American (Pejoves) Fund which I have already announced that had provided for me for the year 2017 on this web blog, and I agree what has been announced about this American Fund's on the radio program.

Regarding my own ancient birth grandfather's Trust that may have been the sole investor of this American Fund through its investing chain as announced on the radio program:

1. I am the well-known lawful heir of my long history birth family by my birth family's biological birthmark inheriting rule.
2. I am the well-known lawful sole beneficiary person of my own ancient birth grandfather's Trust, to the descendants of those who had carried the wealth out from China in ancient time and those who have worked for the Trust as well as this Fund historically.
3. I have inherited my own ancient birth grandfather's Trust on June 30th of 2004.

----May 14th, 2018.

05-12-2018 引发奥运会创意人困扰的原因

05-12-2018 引发奥运会创意人困扰的原因


听说了今天早上的播出的引发奥运会创意人困扰的原因。

我的回应：在我前一阵的博文里有提到，上海地区有家广播电台在2007年播出的一段奥运创意是引发困扰的原因。

我当时已经听说给那家广播电台收到的是DVD，后来听说是参照我2004年的创意所进行的表演，也听说了表演者是唐朝著名诗人白居易的后裔，是美国四大华裔女星之一。她标新创异的服饰风格经常是海外华文报纸的好奇，也可能是引发国内“一看就知”的原因。

----2018年5月12日

05-11-2018 True statement in reality

05-11-2018 True statement in reality

Heard this morning's talk about the Chinese in-laws.
My response: That was the big Chinese wife I have complained about in my blog articles several months ago.

I am the sole beneficiary person of the famous Asian Man's Trust is the real true statement in reality.

----May 11th, 2018

05-10-2018 谢谢中国法律和美国法律依据事实的调查澄清了2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意人是我方敏的事实。

05-10-2018 谢谢中国法律和美国法律依据事实的调查澄清了2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意人是我方敏的事实。


听说了今天早上广播里播出的中美警务人员（非演员）的现场事实调查。
我的回应：谢谢中国法律和美国法律依据事实的调查澄清了2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意人是我方敏的事实。

我方敏2004年6月住址是美国康州斯坦福市夏街900号的4E套房，就在夏街1010号的Janus Associates公司傍边。我是2004年7月-9月搬到麻州的波士顿居住至今，Janus Associates公司也在2004年2月我离开公司后不久就已搬离该地址。

我是在2004年6月一个星期天去美国新泽西州探访我在上海医科大学的黄姓同学住家的时候即兴创作了08年北京奥运会的开闭幕式。我当时没有没有做任何的录音录像努力，当时在场的就只有该黄姓同学及她的婚姻家庭。所以我是相信中国北京政府及08年奥运会创作组一定有收到该创意的录影录音资料的事实依据才有可能在2008年8月8日向全国世界呈现按照我的创意所创作的2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式（至少9成以上节目是源自我方敏的创意）。

谢谢中国政府及警务人员和美国政府及警务人员对此事实的调查。

广播剧节目制作人员是究竟在做事实报道及评论还是在任命“谁才够资格做2008年北京奥运会的创意人”，这是我方敏自2015年以来对广播剧节目制作组的投诉。谁是2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意人是没有可能通过2018年的讨论辩论以"谁可能是，谁才可能有这个才华，以及所谓的同意不同意这个人可以做个创意人”作为节目制作内容，而成为对2008北京奥运开闭幕式创意人真相的权威认证的，这种通过节目制作人来”任命”的做法只能造成舆论混乱的效果。


*physical evidence：看得见摸得着的证据。
*上海医科大学：现复旦大学上海医学院。
*中美警务人员（非演员）的现场事实调查：我听说今早所播出片段是录音室现场事实真相调查而不是现场案件调查，由在录音室现场的中美警方职业调查员进行，不是由演员进行的表演。 I heard the in-studio investigation of the factual truth regarding "who is the creator of the Opening by factual evidence" is conducted by the law enforcement's investigators presented at the studio. The broadcasted piece is not a piece of performing art but in-studio investigation of the truth (not the case).

----2018年5月10日。

05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。

05-09-2018 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。

我方敏从未反对中国共产党对中国960万平方公里土地的管理和统治权， 我方敏从未反对中国共产党，我方敏从未反对中华人民共和国的法制建设。

我方敏反对中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以他们共同利益相关的程虹作为提拔标准来选拔任用中国的国家及地区的领导者，我方敏反对中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以他们共同利益相关的程虹作为中华人民共和国的最高国家利益的唯一准则以及中华人民共和国法制权益的特别高级的拥有者。

我方敏从未在乎中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以及其他已经公开宣布的中国政府官员和他们所共同挚爱的程虹共居一室拥有他们自己的私人恋爱性生活或者一妻多夫的父母子女家庭生活，但我方敏坚决反对中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以他们和程虹的恋爱及性行为作为全面篡夺中华人民共和国的党政军权力及立法司法权力的原因和理由。

我方敏所投诉的一直就是我方敏在作为中国公民在海外生活期间以及我方敏在成为美国公民（2015年6月）以后被中国中国国家主席习近平及中国国家总理李克强以中国国家政权以及中国政府资源所侵犯的中国公民合法权益（2015年6月前），我也已经向美国政府投诉我成为美国公民后被中国政府以中国国家政权所侵犯的美国公民合法权益。

我方敏坚决反对阻碍中华人民共和国法制建设的任何行为， 我方敏坚决拒绝特意向违反中华人民共和国法律的人士提供任何财务资助的任何企图。

----05-09-2018


I, Min Fang, never against Chinese Communist Party's ruling over the land of China.

I, Min Fang, never against China to be a lawful country.

I, Min Fang, refuse to provide financial assistance specially &intentionally to anyone who is convicted by the Laws of the People's Republic of China.

I, Min Fang, refuse to let any unauthorized person spend my money.

I, Min Fang, refuse to let anyone spend my own money against my own wish.

I, Min Fang, refuse to be the victim of the helped harassment through glasshouse cancer. Anyone who deserves to have a place to chat important matters can certainly be redirected to their own glasshouses via the webpage-similar redirecting technology.

----May 9th, 2018

05-08-2018 MBA Education and Economic Theories

05-08-2018 MBA Education and Economic Theories


Heard this morning's talk about what is the general administration in MBA.
My response: I decided to go for MBA education is because of my ambition to be a business person that inspired by the book of <Macroeconomy>.

An Economy is a financial entity and careful managing of it. The Macroeconomy is about the financial entity that has the size of a country or of a region while the microeconomy is about the financial entity that has the size can be small as a coffee shop or big as a multination corporation.

I entered the world of economics from the Macro side which is about the infrastructure of producing, trading and financing the microeconomy in a region or a country that opened my view that is above the size of a multination corporation, but I lack the understanding of how to carefully manage a multination corporation or a coffee shop in its daily operation and in its detailed business transactions. The is the answer I gave when I am asked what I want to learn from an MBA education: When I step into an empty room that I rent to open my first coffee shop, where should I start? Other than the knowledge about how to arrange counters and brew coffees, what else I need to know to run this coffee shop business to make profits?

I read that Macroeconomy when I was a college student and I had worked in a one staff company to take care of all non-managerial matters after college graduation. General Administration of the MBA is the education that I lack in between is what I am studying now: General Administration of the MBA.

My work experience as an independent computer programmer has helped me to bridge the gap between the Macro and Micro of the economy. I had worked in a team that had only 3 full-time and 2 helping hands staff on  a window's security software project under the guidance of a former IBM R&D director, the fact that I had to work independently in each assigned module has helped me to learn to work from the infrastructure conceptual to detail out any software's coding issues systematically.

Under the guidance of the former IBM R&D director, I learned to approach each assignment from the effort of understanding the theoretical concepts of the assignment, then to break down the assignment to the theoretical research of each concept in order to create my own module based on the theories of the concepts.

With this independent research experience, I have been confident that I can correctly assess a technology project's progress in just several brief exchanges with the project team. Ironically, this quick assessing ability that impressed a lot of technology people on June 30th and July 1st of 2004 that I have been so proud of myself was how I got the title of "a performing actress who kept on saying things that are universally correct and applicable".

Actually, all those things I said were all infrastructure-approaching of the project assessment that each brief question & answer exchange had ceased only when the frustrations and issues had been discussed effectively.  I am working on to build this confidence and ability in managerial related progress assessment.

.----May 8th, 2018

Heard this morning's talk about how I could possibly learn without reading enough.
My response: This MBA is the first major I do my homework is a true statement, but I had been a very intense learning listener in most of the in-classroom sessions for the other two majors I graduated, which is a BS in Pharmacology major and an MS degree in Computer Science major.

I was known for doing nothing at all beyond classroom sessions attendance in my entire college years and in my entire graduate education in computer science, while a lot of my college mates needed to study till 1AM-3AM and got up at 5AM daily for some semesters that heavy loaded with Basic Medicine System plus Pharmaceutical courses in pharmacology major. I heard the broadcasting of my saying that I did learn a lot from my college education has triggered a lot of anger from my college mates from both colleges. I only meant to express that I did learn instead of didn't from my college education, how much I actually had learned is surprising to myself as well. Most likely, the real anger is related to how I could earn intellectual incomes so hugely different with their salary incomes from this lousy learning experience.

I am currently a "cancer" patient under constant micro brain surgeries that certainly affected my reading ability. I am a full-time student who can only read for less than 15-20 hours a week. My treatment progresses well that I can now finish most of the required basic reading materials plus do my homework on time.

I may need to learn those what I haven't from some work experiences and I know I will be guided like I always have been.

.----May 8th, 2018

05-06-2018 What is the need to announce "No Such Children" on this Mother's Day?

05-06-2018 What is the need to announce "No Such Children" on this Mother's day?


Heard about this morning's talk of "No such children".
My response: I heard the Ford house featured in this morning is the 5th or 6th generation offsprings of a Miss O'Connor, and this grandmother Miss O'Connor was a Senator's daughter.

No wonder these Fords' mating is O'Connors' to authenticate.

My anger has been why O'Connors so impressively do not allow me to have a child or children? No one ever has expected any O'Connor to concern or to raise my children, why my mother-hood is O'Connors to deny?

So, what is the need to announce "No Such Children" on this Mother's Day?

My anger towards the name Rockefellers is that why this name supports the efforts to belittle a female's value to the degree that completely deny a female's value can be beyond attraction to the biological mating desire from a male? Especially when I am being the female who never attempted to contact anyone from this name in the past to demand anything, how this name needs to have this enormous agitation so impressively in broadcasting as if I have demanded a lot?

But Rockefellers' name is the name insist on to clear out the PPC curve* of my Trusts' investments in their family business as "no association announced". So, I do not know what Rockefeller name means in the matter.

----May 6th, 2018


Heard about this morning's broadcasting about "Judge's Ruling".
My response: My complaint about this radio program has been how it has organized these unrelated & unprofessional to debate these none-of-their-business matters on a public broadcasting channel in the authoritative tone as if announcing the "final ruling", the same as the debate in Chinese you heard from this morning's broadcasting.

I am angry at the fact that all these "performing debates" to devoid me or my wealth are still going on, not for the entertaining purpose but for announcing unauthorized financial transactions purpose.

All my intellectual incomes have been debated by unrelated people through this kind of performing arts, and "ruled" by these Chinese who own Judge licenses as you heard from this morning's broadcasting, and factually transacted in reality since 2007 by rumor.

There never have been cases filed by me or the companies who granted these intellectual incomes in any judicial court for anyone who has a Judge license to rule. And all these transacted money never went to anyone who has intellectually contributed to the companies to deserve a reward that has been in any disputes with the companies who granted these financial rewards of received intellectual contributions that I contributed. These are the rumors I heard and I did call laws help on why my intellectual incomes have been deposited into whoever's bank account and paid taxes in whoever's name?

These efforts are organized by Albert Gore to take over my intellectual making and giving out against my wish is the reason I have to declare Albert Gore's manhood is not privileged to change what I have declared as what I want or what I refuse.

I do not have any association with this Albert Gore is a common knowledge. So, why this Albert Gore's manhood activity is my money to pay or to compensate? Why my wish of how to spend my own money is this Albert Gore's privilege to deny or to challenge? Who the Fxxx this Albert Gore is?

----May 6th, 2018


05-01-2018 My anger is why my name is O'Connors to shit all over on the radio?

*PPC (Production possibility Curve), is commonly understood as the scope of the wealth.

05-02-2018 I refuse sexual harassment

05-02-2018 I refuse sexual harassment 

Heard about a Vietnamese-Chinese girl Anh was featured in this morning's broadcasting.
My response: I heard she is the same Chinese Anh in the same cohort team of risk assessment of mine.

And I heard she was associated with some rumors related to Boston University was the reason she was featured this morning and the announced $5000/month. And I heard this is to encourage this Anh to register for any class that I register from now on.

None of these is my business as long as that is not my money which includes the paid-out $3Billion that was taken by the announced mother of this same person's child. Entire Boston may have heard of this rumor since 2016.

Well, all I care is I am protected by the U.S. laws from sexual harassment and this Anh is not the person privileged to harass me.

I refuse to be harassed by this Anh for any excuses including the blackboard discussion. There is no team project for this course.

The other patrons associated with Charles Ford/Charles Schnieberg name are also not privileged at all to harass me by registering for this online course.


----May 2nd, 2018