01-30-2019 我的亲朋送礼计划 (15) ---- My online gifting idea -- 《Modern Contemporary and Classic Tradition》

I was often doubted how I can claim I am a Chinese Emperors' heir without the People's Republic of China's acknowledgment? I say because the heirship is by the blood and family inheriting rule, not by the People.
----Jan. 30th, 2019

I was often confronted with as long as the Chinese government does not acknowledge, I say only because you are such a barbarian who doesn't know THE CLASS represents the culture with history, not just modern contemporary of round-shape impressionism or functional consciousness that you heard of.
----Jan. 30th, 2019

So I was asked, but how do I say I am truthful on the matter after my own family lost track of the family stories? I say by confronting matter and probing for an answer. Let's see how many doubts about the matter so far.

1: The paintings published on the internet in 2011 were all one-year-old copies,
I heard they were all from the digital version of the originals that each comes with a year certificate.

2: The year certificate has the year 1927, year 1970...on it.
I heard it represents the edition of the photo, the copied-from edition is a digital version.

3: How these paintings relate me to be the heir of the featured Emperors?
First of all, both my father and I resemble my Emperor-ancestors featured in these family portraits.
Second, my 2004's Trust-inheriting was a birthmark-inheriting(updated on Feb. 3rd, 2019)
Also, I own Emperor equivalent entitlements such as Ingonyama etc. originated by them, and I own these family portraits gifted by them since my lawfully valid willed Trust-Inheriting in 2004.

As so popular in a lot of Kingdom-novels, a King normally gift a person with an entitlement,  some valuables (gold, jewelry, etc.), and a beauty.

Well, I am the daughter gifted by my ancient birth Emperor-grandfathers, so I only received entitlements and valuables from my Trust-Inheriting, which means I need to find my handsome, with my ancestors' blessing but won't be an assigned.

----Jan. 30th, 2019

1: Ingonyama title is in the local language, but I came from China?
My response: There are two possibilities for how I got this entitlement officially on June 30th of 2004.
1) I received the original entitlement, given by my ancient Emperor grandfather in Chinese, together with my Trust-Inheriting, Ingonyama its translation in the local language, or
2) this is the entitlement of my ancient grandfather's that I inherited together with the my Trust-Inheriting as the direct-beneficiary-heir of the entitled ancient grandfather of mine.
----Feb. 3rd, 2019

01-28-2019 How a novel, a TV series, or a radio program(show) is evaluated and granted to be published （小说，电视剧和广播剧的遴选发行的程序是什么？）

Another anger I often encounter is the anger from talented literature people: Why I can have the privilege of being the major featured person of this radio program?

I once said I never read scripted lines that every joke or thought was my own articulation as a plus, I said this has been accumulated over the years because the audio raw materials have been from my security tape which has started recording every second since the moment I was born. Some said they all have this type of audio raw material as well, why their thoughts and their articulation are not this privileged? I say they had never thought of so before 2004 was the reason that I was privileged, and they possibly won't persist on publishing their privileges currently because of the sensitiveness from whom have been participating in their thoughts-sharing.

I once expressed my understanding about those English majored literature person, about their anger why it is so easy for me to be recognized in their profession knowing I was never a literature person? I will explain this as much as possible from the knowledge I recently learned from an MBA.

The process of how to evaluate and to grant an opportunity to publish a novel, a TV series, or a radio program (show). （小说，电视剧和广播剧的遴选发行的程序是什么？）

Step 1: When a publishing representative producer(editor) is approached with a piece of work, this producer need to evaluate this piece of work's academic value, and if good, to recommend to publishing executives:（编辑初选）

1)Theme evaluation based on the trends of the readers' choice:（对于作品题材的初选）

• Currently in favor of? Belong to categories that have up-rising favor in readers' choice. recently? Or not obvious yet, but will be in reader favorable trend in this producer's personal opinion.（题材是否是读者喜欢的及喜欢程度等）

2) Literature evaluation based on the publishing company's publishing history,（对于作品文学水准的初选）

• How this theme is expressed? Expression style? Frame style of the storytelling, etc.（观点表达能力及写作水平）

...

Step 2: When a publishing executive received a recommendation from a publishing representative producer (editor), this executive need to evaluate the overall value of publishing this piece of work, and if good, to recommend to publishing financing executive for funding of publishing.（主编筛选）

1) Based on if publishing can upgrade this publishing company's academic value.（学术价值文学价值很高)
2) Based on if publishing can be a best-seller, profitable, etc. (是否可以盈利）
3) Based on if publishing can fulfill the publishing company's social responsibility. (保护地球之类的题材，类似中国的政治任务）
...

Step 3: When a publishing financing executive received a recommendation from a publishing executive, the publishing financing executive will make funding evaluation, and if good, to recommend to publishing CEO to print.（是否能挤进有限的出版指标？）

1) Based on if profitable and how profitable it can be, (根据是否可以盈利值得投资）
2) Based on if easy to raise special funding from somewhere,（发行费用是否可以筹措）
...

Step 4: When the publishing CEO received a recommendation from a publishing financing executive, the publishing CEO need to evaluate possible sales if publish and if worth a try, to grant the pilot publishing. （出版总编的总评估，是否可以短时间小批量的实验性发行）

1) Based on experience from the company's publishing history,（根据公司以前的类似销售纪录）
2) Based on distribution channels feedback. (销售点会不会进货？）
....

Step 5: When the pilot time finished, the publishing CEO will make the decision of official publishing if funding is not an issue. （实验性发行结束后，出版总编会作出是否正式发行的决定）

1) Based on the rating(sales) during the pilot time. (实验性发行期间的收听率，销量）
2) Based on the profitability during the pilot time, from sales or advertising income.（实验性发行期间的销售额和广告收入）
3) Based on if enlarged producing can have funding and how much. (扩大发行需要多少资金）
...

How I was granted pilot publishing(broadcasting) as a major featured person? （我是如何获得试发行的机会成为广播剧的主要人物的？）

1) The pass of Step 3 and 4: I heard on July 1st of 2004, some distribution channels already giving "will participate in broadcasting" feedback, investor-funding was granted, both during the meeting. （第三步和第四步：当时在2004年7月1日的会上，就有广播公司（就是我的生活费用给付的合法性核实的6+1个国家的）表态会参与播出，（就是我的生活费用给付的付款公司）表态会参与投资，还有一些的个人投资,  听说是一百万美金一个，共7百万投资。

2) The pass of Step 5: I heard only one-month pilot broadcasting already generated good rating and good advertising income to cover full-scale producing and publishing (broadcasting) and to be handsomely profitable to the publishing company (radio company). （第五步，我听说一个月的实验性发行结束后，收听率就已经很高，所产生的广告收入也已经可以由广播剧的广告收入本身提供资金支持广播剧的最大发行量出版了，广播公司的收益预计可以很可观。）

3) The pass of Step 2: I heard the reason is: This radio program is the first time uniqueness in radio broadcasting history: Reality show produced from audio raw materials collected from the major featured person's historically accumulated security tape. （第二步，我听说筛选通过的原因是：这个广播剧由主要人物的保安影像记录提供该人物的历史语音资料作为广播剧制作的制作素材资料是广播史上的第一次。）

I will update if I heard how this was officially evaluated in step 1, I know I sell my story good in the same meeting, and I heard the step 1 evaluation was broadcasted in the radio program over 2-3 years ago. （我听说两三年前广播剧就已经播放过当时第一步是如何评估的。）

----Jan. 28th, 2019

Why some Mrs. Rockefellers and some Mrs. Fords have been so angry about me and the radio program?
My response: I assume, it was because I was not really even associated,  while they are the married wives from the entertainment industry background but never have such a privilege in R and F names' family investments. The process of how step 3 and step 4 could be passed at the spot so immediately on July 1st of 2004 was not just unfair to them but also insulting to those who truly romantically involved and associated with.

But the truth was I am the heir Missy, not a wife nor a short romance, to my own birth ancient grandfathers' Trusts that have been investing in those 6+1 counties' participating broadcasting companies. This was explained at the moment already that they themselves have been interested to know who I am was the reason for the willingness to participate in the broadcasting distribution. These participating companies are not Ford name nor Rockefeller name majorly invested.

 The work-centric evaluation based pass of step1 and professional evaluation based pass of step5 are the real true reasons for this radio program's public channel's longtime popular broadcasting.

----Feb. 7th, 2019

01-27-2019 How one's intellectual Income is evaluated? (智慧专利收入是如何评估的？）

I was asked often how I can earn intellectual income? I was so not a hard-working student when I was in school that no one from any school I graduated from could imagine I could possibly be a person who can have some intellectual income. I say this group of people also include those colleagues from Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, but not from Janus Associates who watched me developed modules of Biogate, my first intellectual income. How I grew into a research type of person?

When I was assigned a job in Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, I was a girly college newly graduated who fully welcomed leadership education from Health Department Inspectors I worked with. My work experiences there did not shape into a good lab research tester, but made me into a coercive leader-apprentice enjoyed the opportunities to say, "Do As I Said".

My second job was a computer programmer where I assigned to work on BioGate project, this work experience was when I learned "to form my own hypothesis independently, to discover dynamics in trending independently, and to relate complexities with theories independently. "(quoted from my personal statement of schooling)

Currently, I am in training to be a business leader which means I am in process of being less research geek style but become more humanly understandable, I can tell it is not an easy process so far because still too many people complaining "don't know what she is saying".

Ok, after I briefly explained why I do have some intellectual incomes, let me try to explain how my share of intellectual incomes is evaluated from the best of my knowledge.

Intellectual Incomes evaluation process:
Step 1: When a research project is successfully finished and ready for sale, the first step is to evaluate how much is the price this project can ask.

This project price evaluation would be conducted by a professional evaluation company, and evaluation is based on how much time and cost would be needed in average to conduct such research by an average peer in the industry.  This project evaluation would detail each module and each component of the entire project to have a price as the negotiation base for the research company to bargain with possible buyers.

Step 2: After a successful sale of the research project, the research company would decide the size of rewarding package for the entire group of all kinds of contributors to this research project. The rewarding company would also decide the share for each contributor group, such as research group, helping group, and etc in the company's level of the rewarding package.

Step 3: Once research group's rewarding package size is decided, the research department will evaluate rewarding shares for each component's research group, which is based on the project price evaluation report of each component as well as research participating years.

Step 4: Once each component's rewarding size is decided, each individual contributor's share to this same component can be evaluated based on each academic contribution.

How can my brief idea contribute to intellectually?
Let's see the example of my idea to have a hair growth product based on 章光101(?). My idea is a concept hypothesis and the academic direction of a research project. If I contributed, its market price should also be in the project evaluation report as a component, and I will be evaluated with the contributors to this same component.

How to tell the difference between public relation help with research contribution help?
From my own experience: When research got stuck, help can be from public relation if the research company does not have internal resources to help out. This internal helping resource is also the reason why researchers from a big research company have much less share in their company's rewarding packages. And IRS has the standard to different research contribution help with public relation help to ensure the correct income tax rate.

----Jan. 27th, 2019

How a company buys an intellectual property?
It is similar to buying a house property. Once the price of the intellectual property is decided, the payment size of downpayment and each installment can be calculated based on the valid patent's duration time which is averaged for about fifty years.
----March 31st's next day, 2019

很多人经常问我，我哪有可能会有智慧专利收入？读书时，我确实不是一个用功的学生，我所毕业的每一所学校，就没人相信我居然可以有智慧专利收入。我说这拨人还得加上我曾经工作过的南京市药品检验所，不过我的第二份工作，就是美国的电脑公司的同事就不会这么说了，因为他们都是亲眼看着我一天一点的做出了Bio Gate这个研究项目。那我究竟是如何成长为一个研究人员的？

当我大学毕业分配到南京市药品检验所上班时，我就只是一个大学刚毕业的女孩，特别喜欢跟着卫生局药品监督室的工作人员学习当领导，这第一个工作没让我成为一个实验室的强手，而是让我有机会练习独立强硬的领导风格，我也非常喜欢练习这一句“就照我说的办”。

我的第二份工作是电脑程序员，接到的项目就是Bio Gate。是这份工作的研究经历让我学会了自己"独立的决定研究方向，独立的发现变化中的动态界定因素，独立的将研究所经历的复杂性与相应的理论相联系。”（摘自我自己写的一份上学用的《自我介绍》）

目前，我因为在读MBA的企业管理，所以我正在努力让自己少一点研究人员“不理世俗事”的倔强，多培养一点可让凡人都可沟通的理解，不过我很清楚这过程不那么简单，目前还是有太多人在抱怨“根本就不知道她在说什么做什么”。

好了，简略地说清楚了我确实是有智慧专利收入的，我来尽我的能力解释一下智慧专利收入都是如何评估的。

智慧产权的评估过程：
第一步：当一个研究项目成功且可以出售时，第一步就是对这个研究额项目可能的市场价值做个评估。

这个研究项目的市场价值评估是由专门的评估公司进行的，评估是根据“如果这个行业里的一个中等水平的企业需要做这样一个研究，会需要多少时间和经费”来评估的。这个研究项目的评估报告还会详细列举这个项目中的每一个部分每一个环节的可能市场价值，作为研究公司和可能买家进行讨价还价的依据。

第二步：一个科研项目成功卖出后，研究公司就会决定智慧专利奖金的一些细节奖励对于研究项目成功的各种贡献人员。研究奖励公司也会决定各贡献部门的各自奖金规模（由公司发放的），包括研究部门，辅助部门等等。

第三步：当研究部门拿到公司给予的奖金规模，研究部门就会依据这个研究项目的市场价值评估报告中的细节单价来决定每一个环节每一个部分的奖金大小，再根据参与研究人员的学术贡献及参与研究团队的年份予以评估（这一步有点像国内的上下级单位一起的分房，专利奖金就是“上级单位可以拿到的总房源”）。

第四步，当每一个环节的小组奖金的多少决定了之后，这个小组的所有参与人员再根据贡献大小评估各自的奖金。（这一步就是国内的下级单位分房）

类似我的一些简短概念型的一两句话贡献，又是如何评估的？
那就看一下我2004年7月一日有一段利用章光101来研究头发生长产品的主意。我的主意其实就是一个研究项目的概念立项和研究方向。如果我做出了贡献，也就是说我的概念和方向让研究课题立项了，也成功了，也可以赚钱了，按照这个研究概念方向对这个研究项目成功所做出的这一份贡献的市场价值也是在整个研究项目的市场价值的评估报告中的一个细节项目，我也会和其他参与这个概念立项环节的人员一起参与奖金评估。

如何区别对于研究项目的公共关系类帮助和智慧投入类帮助？
从我自己的研究经历：当研究遇到卡壳的时候，当研究单位内部的资料室没有相关资料可协助研究时，公共关系类的帮助让研究人员可以查阅一些外部资料，对研究项目的贡献是很大的。这个内部资料室是很多大的研究机构的研究员在其单位的专利奖金里的份额不高的很大原因（内部资料室是公司的智慧实力所以是属于公司的奖励份额，不是个人份额）。因为公关奖金收入（美国联邦税30%左右）和智慧专利收入(美国联邦税10%）的税率不同，所以税务局有严格规定标准来区分究竟奖金所得是属于公关奖金还是智慧奖金。

----2019年1月27日。

公司如何购买智慧专利产权
公司买智慧专利产权，就像老百姓买房子。买房子是先支付一部分的钱做为首期，然后住在房子里每月一边拿工资一边付贷款；公司买专利也是先付一部分首期，然后用买到的专利做生意赚钱同时按月支付专利费用款项。智慧专利平均有效期是五十年，所以购买公司一般按五十年分期付款。智慧专利奖金就是奖金发放公司从专利购买公司的付款中支付的，也是首期和每月付款。

----2019年3月31日的第二天撰写

01-23-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （12）--- 刘凯故事的播出制作

（我一直在做解释，就因为我一直在被这个问题困扰愤怒: 我不就是和你们在同一个学校念过书吗？自1985年从高中毕业到现在这么多年，我和谁谈恋爱，拿了什么钱，能管你们这些同一个高中毕业的什么事？怎么都应该被你们吆喝“凭什么”？还要联合起来对付我？怎么就只是在同一个学校念了几年书，我就欠了你们的了？听说他们的愤怒居然是: 他们就是难以相信我居然敢把钱直接放进自己的口袋里？我的什么钱居然就是不可以放进我自己的口袋里？！！！！南师大附中的：我在美国20年的过去就从未联系过你们，今后也不会需要联系你们。----2019年1月26日。）

我方敏是南师大附中85届2班毕业的，但我不是这个班毕业的其他人的同学。我已经学到了这个知识，我会终身记得的。我也听到了这个班毕业的其他人的声明，那是正常了，既不是朋友，又不是同学，还能是什么态度还能说些什么话？我也是这样了。----2019年1月27日。

有人说，我是否需要如此立场，我方敏态度，如果我听说的传言真实，一切都是预谋，我方敏就认为我方敏是需要而且必须是如此立场态度。因为我方敏不愿因为认识了这些南师大附中毕业的，就被算计，就被暗算，就被陷害，就被设计而成为任何意义上的受害者。我目前是已经在法律保护下，我今后也会毫不犹豫需求法律保护而不被这些人骚扰，恐吓，威胁。----2019年1月31日。

（听说刘凯已和她的儿子在美国团圆，听说目前各方也都在按照她本人的意愿保护她的新的婚姻。如果听到今天早上的播出内容，就应该很清楚所宣布的就是我不可能是弄清传言是否真实的人选。就此类声明传言，我方敏只会强调我方敏的私人财产和这些名字人物统统无关，也不是他们的婚姻伴侣所可以任意占领的，我也已经就这些传言报警处理。如对有关刘凯的传言有任何疑问，请接洽南师大附中高中85届2班的其他在美同学，我和这些85届的（包括在波士顿的），甚至南师大附中的其他校友统统都没有联络，今后也不会有任何联络。----2019年1月24日。）

听说，在南师大附中校友中，很多人非常气愤的是刘凯婚姻家庭故事的制作播出对刘凯本人生活所造成的负面影响。

我先说明并请查实：
1：我本人从未参与广播剧的制作，也从未听到过广播剧的制作版本或播出版本。
2：我听说的，广播剧有关刘凯故事的制作是在国内制作，所采用的是由刘凯授权的国内商业运作模式剪辑制作宣传促销。

我听说的，刘凯本人的难以理解在于为什么她的故事只是有限收入，而非百分比的利润提成？刘凯的愤怒是为什么她被“如此当众处罚”， 而我却是按百分比提成？在可以查实上述两点说明的前提下，我对此的解释：

1：广播剧是在2005年在美国广播公司上线播出，2007年年底左右被中国进口在中国播放。刘凯的故事在国内可以被商业制作就是因为有这个热播的广播剧作为播放平台，而我按百分比利润提成就是广播公司对于我的人生经历对广播剧热播贡献的奖励。也就是俗话说的，如果没有我的这个热播中的广播剧作为播放渠道，刘凯的婚姻家庭故事就卖不出一个子。

(我和美国制作团队的提成和投资人一样，是在美国的广播剧发行总公司的利润里提取，而作为我曾经的高中同学大学同学等等参与广播剧制作的，有适当的由制作中心从广播剧的制作费里所支付的参与酬谢金；或者类似刘凯这种，作为我曾经的高中同班同学参与广播剧制作，又同时有她自己独立的婚姻家庭故事的，所领取的是由制作中心从广播剧的制作费里所支付的故事费，所领取金额大小也是由制作中心根据中国美国相关法律，广播公司的公司规定和所参与制作的故事情节的可能收听率（也就是市场价值）所决定的，我方敏本人完全没有参与价格的制定。我听说的：美国制作中心对这些类似刘凯婚姻家庭的独立故事的制作规定是 1)故事的市场吸引力，至少是可以让广播剧继续保持已有的收听率，2）制作费用不得高于多少 ---- 2019年1月26日更新）
（类似于综艺节目来说明，中国制作中心类似是特邀评审，这些独立故事人物就是类似综艺节目的特约嘉宾，美国制作团队和我的基本人生经历故事制作就是在保持该综艺节目的收视率，这样，这些特邀评审和特约嘉宾可以有参与制作费甚至可以高一些。----2019年2月8日）

（我和广播剧美国制作团队能够拿到广播公司给予的百分比提成作为奖励，就是因为我的人生经历和制作团队的努力将广播剧制作成了一个非常成功的播放平台，这点就类似于国内的综艺节目，支持人和采编团队的努力就是让综艺类节目成为了一个可以让参与节目的人一炮而红的播放平台。刘凯的故事及其他的参与者就是因为有了这么一个播放平台才可以有每集的参与制作费用及故事费。如果广播剧不是一个盈利的播出平台，刘凯的故事在中国包括江苏人民广播电台的播出（综艺或者社会探讨栏目）都是不会有任何故事费可以领取的，更不用说其他人只是在广播上说几句话就可以拿到的丰厚参与费用了。因为一切费用的支付都是根据美国中国的法律及行规而给付的，所以，我（的收入）和刘凯的故事究竟如何给付也没有任何直接关系。---- 2019年1月26日更新）

(听说了一些关于广播剧的困扰是“如果没有这些独立故事支撑，广播剧的播出时间会短些，我的利润分成会少些，所以，如果我不拿钱出来，我就对不起南师大附中校友。
我的回应是：这是误会。首先，这些独立故事在广播剧超过10年高收听率的总播出时间上所占比例很小，其次，如果有时间，广播剧是可以充分展开一些相关内容的。广播剧因为时间的限制，对所播出内容所牵涉的背景资料知识没有充分展开，致使很多播出内容没有被并没有相关特定的专业知识背景的社会普通大众所听懂，这也是造成2017年美国广播公司对这一由中国总理和英国王子代为表达的问题做出根据法律而给出的公开回答后，至今尚未被南师大附中校友所听懂所理解的原因。还有一个就是广播剧那一个星期的播出对于我的唐太宗李世民继承人的介绍，
第一，用考古学的专业知识分析推理研究而得出结论说我可能是一千三百年前的唐太宗李世明的继承人而将我和爷爷唐太宗李世民连在了一起，
第二：用法律所认可的事实依据证实了我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，
第三，用历史学的知识说明了唐高祖李渊唐太宗李世民和东汉皇帝的继承人，而说明了历史上的汉唐一家，
第四，用一个法律上的我是一个东汉皇帝信托的唯一受益人而证实了汉唐一家。
但广播剧的制作没有就考古，法律，及历史对于该说明所需要的背景知识充分展开，是造成海外华裔非华裔社区普遍认可我是唐太宗李世民血脉传承的继承人而很多没有基本法律概念的中国大陆人士认为我是假冒伪造根本就是被外国势力扶持在讹诈中国政府的重要原因。如果我的说法很不准确，请纠正。----2019年2月26日）

我一直也被这个问题困扰: 我不就是和你们在同一个学校念过书吗，怎么个我和谁谈恋爱，拿了什么钱，都应该被你们吆喝？怎么就只是在同一个学校念了几年书，就欠了你们的了？

我本人在2015年2016年时期，也一再就国内一些人士认为他们自己也可以让任何广播剧成功而表态：各个国家的广播公司很多，频道很多，时段也很多，为什么不找广播公司推销你们自己故事，做你们自己的广播剧？非得砸了我的广播剧？这不是钱的问题，或者广播剧是不是播出时间太长该下线了的问题，而是我本人的名誉受到很大影响。

美国方面很多人也有国内类似看法，所以从2015年年底开始，他们替换了整个制作团队，对我进行痛骂打砸，并大幅增加其他人物故事，以区分并呈现不同，就为使用这同一个热播平台展现各自才华。我听说的，从2016年3月起，广播剧就不再热播，并造就一堆的投诉和法律问题，我本人是从2015年年底起就本人名誉受损一再报警。

2：刘凯的婚姻家庭故事的商业运作范围主要局限在中国，是因为这一类问题在美国属于法律处理的范围，没有中国国内的全民纠结。

在美国，一旦碰到孩子被证实是婚姻外所育这一类事情，做丈夫的，首先是搬出夫妻的共同居所，然后诉请离婚或婚姻无效，也就是寻求法律支持，拒绝支付孩子生活费用。这婚姻纠结就解决了，这婚姻家庭故事就结束了。这在美国是通识常识，没人会将刘凯婚姻家庭故事作为社会问题探讨，所以刘凯的婚姻家庭故事对世界其他法制先进国家的广播公司的吸引力有限。刘凯的故事在广播剧里的播出，播出内容其实并没有强调她的婚姻故事的对与错，而是强调中国的国情及美国的法律处理之间的差别。

我听说的，刘凯的收入中，1）一部分是由制作费用支付的，由国内的一家艺术中心从美国公司所支付的这几集的制作费用中支付的，2）还有很大一部分就是广播剧播出后的周边产品所产生的广告收入所支出的，也就是俗称的听众点评节目所吸引的广告，这一部分是由国内广播电台作为播放公司所支付的，我听说和刘凯的分成比例很高。据说美国没有类似的听众点评所产生的广告收入，刘凯就不会有美国方面的评论节目广播电台所支付的广告收入提成。至于其他亚洲国家是否有类似听众点评，应该可以向广播公司查询。

我本人广播剧收入的百分比提成是由各国购买节目及广告收入提成后的美国制作播出公司的总利润里提成的，也就是我的提成基数是在刘凯的收入作为广播公司的制作及促销播出的成本费用予以扣减后，才进行核算的，与刘凯故事的制作播出收入没有任何直接关系。

举例说明：
1：剧集播放版权的销售收入，按播放季节（年）计算。如果广播剧的剧集是1万元一集，每天一集，中国买一季（年）就是365万。当年由中国制作的刘凯节目只有几集。
2：广告收益提成，也是按播放季节（年）计算，主要收入都是在广播剧的主要播放时段所产生的，听众点评节目所产生的很少，而且不是固定收入（只有在一些听众点评节目愿意点评所播出的内容时才会有）。听说刘凯挨骂主要是因为听众点评节目。
3：如果按照合同，中国播出公司需要交给美国公司这一年由广播剧时段播段所产生的广告利润的50%，这也就是已经扣除了因为这几集而由刘凯本人所产生的听众点评相关的广告收入分成收入之后所计算出的利润，而且还是全年收入。

这两项，是美国广播公司的广播剧收入，还要再扣除美国方面的制作和推销的成本等等之后，才是我的百分比提成的计算基数。所以说，我的百分比提成和刘凯故事的商业运作没有直接关系。

我的意思就是：刘凯故事的2009年所制作的，后期剪辑成7天应该是美国团队，美国人因为很熟悉法律处理方式，没有中国国内对此类婚姻问题的一腔愤怒，所以，对她的婚姻应该没有任何对错的指责，也没有愤怒控诉，就只是报道中美对此婚姻问题的不同处理方式。播出前后，中国以外地区的收听率也应该不会有很大波动（这些都可以查核）。在中国，如果播出前后的收听率有很大波动，那就看一下广告客户广告收入是否有很大波动。就我所知，广播剧的广告收入来源主要是广播剧播出时段的广告收入，点评节目的广告收入份量很小。

如果刘凯本人或南师大附中的校友对我的解释有疑问，请接洽广播剧的制作播出公司以寻求真相。如果我本人言论与事实真相之间有重大区别，可以电邮给我予以纠正。电邮地址：somebodyinMA@gmail.com

----2019年1月23日。

刘凯故事的商业运作，可能是所有中国女人都可以对我方敏高吼：“就是要操了你的男人，就是要拿了你的钱，就是够资格“的原因。估计现在是掀锅盖的时候，来表达“你他妈的算老几”。我是在美国已经报警了。

据说是从2009年起，就实施了这份操作。她还在中国政府安排下，由别人付费整容后，特意与我喜欢的什么男人谈恋爱，不知真假，也不知是哪一个。据说就是2003年8-9月间我在华盛顿维州的Hyatt（假日酒店）大厅遇见的那一个，还一再强调，很确定就是同一个才。。。。

气的就是这份气势："他妈的，就是冲着这人是你喜欢的男人才要操的，中国政府就是有这个能力有这个实力拉这个皮条"。要是真实，中国政府根本就是妓院打杂的下贱本事下贱做法下贱有效，中国政府所呈现的本事能力，也就是妓院的打杂的就是会乘着替妓女拎个屎盆子出来倒倒的机会，顺便在你身上泼点，耍点小聪敏，就为恶心死你。

----2019年1月23日。

01-21-2019 与南京方面的矛盾(11) --- 广播剧制作和南师大附中85届2班（乙班）的刘凯 （A classmate from the high school )

听说刘凯前夫刘丹是否在和刘凯结婚之前已育有小孩，是造成刘凯婚姻困扰的原因，也是造成刘凯及很多南师大附中校友认为我1996年当时做法很离谱的原因。听说广播剧对此“是否有小孩”的报道是：英文用的是“Abortion”（流产，意即没有离开母体存活的小孩），中文用的是“引产”（可能有离开母体后存活的小孩） 。我本人是在1990年以后曾听刘凯说过刘丹很花心，但只在2015年以后才听说刘丹以前的恋爱故事花絮。

Abortion is the ending of a pregnancy by removal or expulsion of an embryo or fetus before it can survive outside the uterus.^{[note 1]}  （from： https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion ）
----2019年8月2日增。


I had never romantically associated or socially close to her ex-husband or his associated, in high school or after graduation.

I don't have a male's middle section, and I don't have Liu, Kai's female middle section, please don't ever consult any money matter associated with any male's middle section nor Liu, Kai's female middle section. I am not the person care about this article featured Liu, Kai in any way nor anyhow.

I don't have a male's middle section, and I don't have other female's middle section but my own, please don't ever consult any money matter associated with any male's middle section nor any female's middle section except my own. I am not the person care about any matter associated with any male's middle section nor any female's middle section except my own.
(----updated on Jan. 22nd, 2019)

我只是也是她的前夫的高中同班同学，在南师大附中上学期间及高中毕业以后，从未与其前夫甚至其前夫友好交往过密，既从未有过任何情愫，也鲜少社交往来。

我身上没长一条男人阳具，我身上也没长了刘凯自己的屁股，请不要向我查寻任何有关男人阳具所牵涉的任何金钱事物，也不要向我查询刘凯自己的屁股所牵涉的任何金钱事物。我不关心任何有关这个南师大附中85届2班毕业的刘凯的任何事情任何情形。

我身上没长一条男人阳具，我身上也没长了其他的女人自己的屁股，请不要向我查寻任何有关男人阳具所牵涉的任何金钱事物，也不要向我查询任何其他女人自己的屁股所牵涉的任何金钱事物。除了我自己的，我不关心任何男人阳具任何女人屁股所牵涉的任何事物包括金钱事物。

南京传言我给了南师大附中高中85届2班的这人那人什么钱，对其他人非常不公平，我方敏声明这是从未发生过的事，我方敏也不知困扰疑问是什么。2004年7月1日那天我所做的金钱安排都有当时的会议记录可供查寻，我现在就是基本上可以很肯定没有做过此种安排。
（----2019年1月22日更新）。


Liu, Kai graduated from the same class of 1985's Nanjing Teacher's College Affiliated High School. I heard radio program had featured some stories of her family and her marriage. Before I left China in 1996, I was not happy with her attitude about how she insisted on to let the entire world know "the only person would truly interest in me" was a happily married, aged and dwarf man from Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, I was not tough on expressing myself strong opposite opinion because of the situation that I was leaving China for good.

When I visited her in China in 2007, her attitude toward me had been "who the fxxx you think you are?" and challenging. I truly don't think I need nor obligated to be in touch with this person, and I never contacted her ever since. I will never get in touch with such a person.

I heard about in 2010 that my round-trip ticket to the U.S. that I bought from another same class graduated in 1996 was ￥4000-5000 higher than it should be. I heard it was per her request which was after she voluntarily lent me ￥3000 which I had paid back by the end of 1997 with the amount of ￥4500.

In 2009, I heard rumors that she had a car accident in Nanjing which was right after the featured broadcasting of her stories, but I did not hear any negative reactions from the Chinese community in Boston, so I thought the rumor was either untrue or she came out OK. I heard recently that she never had such a car accident and she has been living with her son in the U.S. for some years already. I heard she may have participated producing the radio program, which I assume has been the reason of such base theme in the radio program as "who the fxxx you think you are?", "I do the exact opposite of whatever you say", and "you will be so lucky if you can ever be wanted sexually."

I heard she remarried well, and tons of rumors about how well her marriage has been. I declare I have independent finance from any male's middle section, and I will never have any financial association with this Liu, Kai, her family associated, and her marriage associated.

Other clarifications that I need to make:
1: About her maiden family before 1996. She told me that her mother's husband, a retired veteran in 1996, had been very nice to her, and always willing to handsomely answer her financial demands including her wedding costs in 1992. Her mother's apartment was related to her mother's workplace and, possibly registered in her mother's name. This was pretty much I had spilled in that 1996 conversation in Nanjing Institute of Drug Control.

2: About her own marriage. She told me during my 2007 visit that she had a divorce after 2004, her ex-husband paid her son's support monthly from Canada.

----Jan. 21st, 2019


我只是也是她的前夫的高中同班同学，在南师大附中上学期间及高中毕业以后，从未与其前夫甚至其前夫友好交往过密，既从未有过任何情愫，也鲜少社交往来。

我身上没长一条男人阳具，我身上也没长了刘凯自己的屁股，请不要向我查寻任何有关男人阳具所牵涉的任何金钱事物，也不要向我查询刘凯自己的屁股所牵涉的任何金钱事物。我不关心任何有关这个南师大附中85届2班毕业的刘凯的任何事情任何情形。

我身上没长一条男人阳具，我身上也没长了其他的女人自己的屁股，请不要向我查寻任何有关男人阳具所牵涉的任何金钱事物，也不要向我查询任何其他女人自己的屁股所牵涉的任何金钱事物。除了我自己的，我不关心任何男人阳具任何女人屁股所牵涉的任何事物包括金钱事物。
（----2019年1月22日更新）。

.
刘凯是南师大附中85届2班的毕业的，据说广播剧曾经报道过她的家庭及婚姻。我是1996年离开中国前，因为1996年南京市药检所的绯闻事件，对于刘凯1996年在事件中立场是强调让大众知情那才是“唯一会爱”我方敏的而很反感，但因即将出国而未采取强硬立场表达我方敏本人态度。2007年我回中国探亲期间，感受到其始终对我方敏保持挺着脖子较劲对着干的态度，我方敏认为没有任何需要也没有任何责任义务和刘凯保持任何联络，2007年离开南京后就再未联络，我今后也永远不会联络。

我是2010年前后才听说我1996年离开中国时，在刘凯以同学名义借给我3000元人民币后，刘凯和傅萍联手将价值5000-6000元人民币的赴美往返飞机票以一万元人民币的价格卖给我，而我本人在1997年年底左右就以1：1.5的比例偿还了刘凯人民币共计4500元。

在2009年，我在美国听说了刘凯可能在南京出车祸的消息，但波士顿华人社区似乎无人听说，我也认为可能消息是假或者她本人安然无恙。现在听说她当时没有出车祸，目前她是和她儿子在美国生活，可能有参与广播剧的制作是我认为造成广播剧情调充斥“你他妈的算老几”，“你说东我就偏要朝西”，“你能有人要就不错了”等等情怀的原因。

听说她本人有再婚，传言很多，我方敏强调我方敏财务独立，和任何有钱男人的财务都无关，也与刘凯现在及今后的可能的生活不可能有任何财务交往。

我方敏所需做的其他相关说明：
1：1996年以前刘凯的家庭生活，她本人和我说的，她母亲的丈夫对她很好，刘凯本人20多岁时婚前婚后都很愿意按照刘凯要求给予经济资助，刘凯结婚所需费用也是由他出资。刘凯家里当时的住所当时是因刘凯母亲单位分房而得，估计是登记在刘凯母亲名下。这基本上就是1996年我在离开药检所之前和别人所说的。

2：刘凯自己的婚姻生活。2007年我回南京探亲，刘凯本人亲自和我谈及，她本人2004年后离婚，其前夫（也是高中同班同学）每月从加拿大支付她所生儿子的生活费用。

----2019年1月21日。

01-20-2019 My money is law matter, never a debatable political matter.（我的遭遇是法律事务而不是政治问题）

I am often asked why I insist on to make my horrible experience a law matter instead of a political matter?
My answer: The difference between law matters and political matters is the same distinction as the difference between civil law matter and criminal law matter.

My horrible experience is not a political matter but a law matter
1: Because I am not a public official of the United States or of the People's Republic of China, but a commoner citizen in the United States.
2: Because my wealth is not tax-payers' money collected from citizens of the United States or citizens of the People's Republic of China, but my private wealth inherited from my birth grandfathers.

Taking my money is not a civil law matter but a criminal law matter because:
1: There is no argument if I am the sole beneficiary person according to the money-giver's wish.
2: There is no argument if money is lawfully given to me exclusively.

This is precisely the reason I say it has been ridiculous for producing radio program to debate if I could possibly have some money. If I have money is a law matter, never a debatable political matter.

I heard this morning's debate is all about why I should be the one having lawful ownership, which is also never a debatable political matter but a law matter.

----Jan. 20th, 2019

经常有人问我，为什么一定要坚持我的遭遇应该是法律事物而不是政治问题？
我的回答：法律事务和政治问题的区别是很明确的，就像刑法案件和民法纠纷之间的区别一样非常明确。

我的悲惨遭遇是法律事物而不是政治问题，就在于
1：我不是美国或者中国的政府官员，只是美国的一个普通公民。
2：我的财产不是中华人民共和国或者美国的纳税人缴纳的税收而来，我的财产是由继承了亲生爷爷的信托而来的私人财产。

拿走我的钱是刑法案件而非民事纠纷，就在于：
1：我是每一笔钱的给钱者所愿意给钱的唯一受益人，这点是无可争议的。
2：每一笔给我的钱都是合法支付给我一人独自使用的，这点也是无可争议的。

所以我说老在那里辩论来逻辑推理我应不应该有钱，简直是某名奇妙。我是否有钱是法律事务，不是什么可辩论的政治问题。

听说今天早上是在辩论为什么就必须是我的钱？这也是法律问题，不是什么可辩论的政治问题。

----2019年1月20日。

据说一些89年学运在美国的一直很气愤我为什么在2004年取消了他们的工资钱。
我就一直说，我哪有可能取消美国的国会批准给他们的工资钱？那钱是美国国库的开支，就像美国的联邦雇员的工资一样，只有美国的国会可以做决定，州政府的开销及州府雇员的工资只能是由州政府做决定一样，我根本从来就不是美国政府的联邦或者州府官员，那有可能搭界？

就像我的财产是私有财产，美国的国会或者美国的联邦或者州政府官员也不可能决定一样，完全不搭界。

我就是认为他们当时只有三十几岁，都有美国公民身份，也就是再找一份工作做做，没什么了不起的。

2004年以前，我是在美国的私营公司工作，和美国国库的关系就是缴税，对国库的开支等等并不关心，也就是和普通老百姓一样，会为一些传说中的国库的不合理开销而气愤气愤。但当时因为牵涉到的都是一批89年学运人士，很多也就是留学美国的和我前后几届的大学毕业的，所以也没有特别的气愤，就只是觉得他们重新找份工也没什么了不起的。

----2019年1月20日。

01-19-2019 Who should be the one to help me in such a situation? （究竟谁是能帮到我的？）

01-19-2019 Who should be the one to help me in such a situation? （究竟谁是能帮到我的？）


Heard about curiosity, from a lot of people, who would be responsible to help me out of my current situation.

Law enforcement is the answer, but how? I will explain what I know step by step.

1: If a family has family stories about a possible Trust but nobody informs anyone from the family to inherit it.
Answer: Law enforcing will do the investigation and, if true, will replace entrusting attorney(s), etc. on behave of the beneficiary patron(s), and will ensure newly assigned (by a Judge) entrusting attorney(s) will inform the beneficiary patron(s) of the family to inherit the Trust. But no law enforcing personnel will need to contact the beneficiary family unless for investigation purpose.

Entrusting attorney(s) do not pay out money according to the agreement, law enforcing involvement is similar to this.

2: If similar to my situation, which is I can't receive those on time paid-out from my inherited Trusts. 
Answer: Law enforcing will do the investigation upon my complaints, to track down why, and to ensure I can receive the paid-out from my inherited Trusts, but no law enforcing personnel will contact me unless for investigation purpose. All I know would be I will receive letters that include some deposited credit cards, or informing me about my banking access information of how much money. Law enforcing will also ensure I can receive such letter(s) even if I have to change my mailing address for some reasons.

3: If similar to my situation of intellectual incomes, which is I don't know for certain but positive about if I have intellectual income or how much.
Answer: Law enforcing will do the investigation upon my inquiry and, if true, will ensure I receive intellectual income that is evaluated and paid by the rewarding company, but no law enforcing personnel will contact me unless for investigation purpose. All I know would be I will receive an informing letter, or together with a paying check. Law enforcing will also ensure I can receive such letter(s) even if I have to change my mailing address for some reasons.

----Jan. 19th, 2019


很多人很好奇，像我现在这种情况，究竟谁是能帮到我的？
答案是：警方。我会就我所知道的做一步一步的解释。

1：如果家里传下来的故事说是家里老人有财产，或者是办过信托之类的，但没人通知家里任何人继承。
答案：警方接到这类查询投诉，会进行调查，如果属实，警方会代表这家受益人的利益，通过法庭更换信托或财产的受委托律师，再确保由法庭所指定的新的受委托律师通知这家的受益人继承财产。除非有调查取证的需要，否则不会有警方人员和这个家庭的任何联络。

2：如果类似我的情况，也就是收不到已经继承了的信托所支付的金钱给付。
答案：警方接到我的投诉，会进行调查原因，会保证我收到我已经继承了的信托所按时支付的金钱给付，但除非警方人员的调查需要，否则不会有警方人员和我联络。我就只会接到一些信件，每个里面有一张已存入了预定的给付金额的信用卡，或者是如何从某银行提取预定的给付金额的提款信息。警方也会确保我收到这些信件，不管我是否因为某些原因而必须更换收信地址。

3：如果类似我的情况，也就是不太确定但估计应该会有智慧产权收入。
答案：警方接到我的查询投诉，会进行调查，如果属实，警方会确保我收到由智慧专利的奖励公司评估并支付的智慧专利收入，但除非警方人员的调查需要，否则不会有警方人员和我联络。我就是会接到一份通知我有关智慧专利收入的信件，可能在这同一份信里就附了一张支票。警方也会确保我收到这些信件，不管我是否因为某些原因而必须更换收信地址。

----2019年1月19日。

01-18-2019 Weather forecasting style interview to argue about what already happened in the past（以天气预报形式做访谈以预期展望过去早已发生过事件）

Heard about this morning's arguments if I can have money. I heard this is the same 2016 producing team that completely ignored all factual truthful evidence but argued if I could possibly be the creator of Beijing Olympic Gaming Opening Ceremony（2008北京奥运会开幕式创意). Well, it is well known that "logically can't be me" was broadcast as the Chinese Central government's official announcement on the matter despite what the truth is together with factual evidence.

I heard the leader editor is an MBA graduated who obviously knows what is pro forma, predicting,  and forecasting. So, this is the radio program interviewing for discussion of the past events using"logical arguments, weather forecasting style to forecast the chance of "what happened in the past" with the possibility presented in percentage. In this year of 2019, they are still predicting if I could possibly have inherited some money already in 2004!!!

据说今天早上又在争辩预报究竟我有没有钱了。据说这就是2016的同一个制作团队，就是那个完全无视事实依据和真相，就只用一些他们自己认为 “逻辑上来说不可能是方敏”的访谈评论和预期，将这些逻辑预期在2016年作为中国中央政府对于我是否是2008北京奥运会创意人的正式声明来播报的同一个制作团队。

我听说主要剪辑是个美国的工商管理硕士毕业的，估计就是因为学过专业的财政预算，经济政策金融风险的预期，以及经营融资收益预报的。所以，就用专业的预测，预算和预期来报道这些过去就已经发生过的种种事件，制作如此专业的“是逻辑类别的争辩，但采用天气预报形式，以事件发生的可能机率，运用预估模式”，对已发生过的事件所进行的时事访谈报道。都已经2019年了，他们还在预期展望我是否有可能早在2004年就已经继承过财产没有。

也就是没话找话，啰里啰唆，广东人说的“口水多过茶”，鲁迅作品里的那个祥林嫂了。

----Jan. 18th, 2019

01-17-2019 Anger featured in "Put the money on the table !" （“把钱放在桌上！” 所表达的愤怒）

Yesterday, I finally understand why the Chinese producing team has featured some stories about Chinese government supported yelling at everybody "put the money on the table".

First, for my blood associated, it means "Put the old man's stuff on the table" to feature my cousins' anger of not familiar with what is a Trust or its legal definition. I heard it has been explained all this time but some of my close cousins are still angry at me for
1) Why insist that my 2004's inheriting was Trust-Inheriting instead of Family Inheriting,

• Answer: Trust-inheriting was the category of my 2004's inheriting, which is according to its legal definition, not upon my insist-on.

2) Why to insist that I am the sole beneficiary person?

• Answer: Because I was specified a sole beneficiary person by the settler of the Trust. So, it was inheriting according to will, not upon my insist-on.

Second, for some who don't have blood association with me, it is to feature their anger from the misunderstanding of 1950's Shanghai stock market shutdown.

In 1950 or so, newly formed People's Republic of China's government sent a group of armed military personnel to forcefully shut down the Shanghai stock market. Other than with yells of "Put everything on the table and leave", it was reported that the entire process was tense and peaceful but left every investor empty hand with tears.

The misunderstanding was since China re-opened Shanghai Stock Market which enriched a lot of investors through IPO. A lot of Chinese, not just some rich Shanghainese, have started questioning what happened to all those investors money in the 1950's shut down? The question is not about the cash that those investors carry with them but what their stock certificates represented.

Each stock certificate represents an investor's ownership of a company. When those investors at the market left the trading room, they left behind their stock certificates, not the cash value that these stock certificates represented but the share of ownership of the company. Since that day, all market tradable stock certificates became invalid, all those market-traded companies became country-run companies by depositing business profits into the government-anointed bank accounts. The entire time, there was no cash value transacted, but those companies' ownership taken-over by groups of marched-in government employees.

The misunderstanding featured in the radio program was from the anger about who took the cash value of those handed-over stock certificates in 1950 and who has hidden these cash value at where since that day. Well, there is no such cash value at all, it was only companies' management change to deposit business making into bank accounts owned by the country instead of those owned by investors.

昨天，我总算弄清楚了为什么中国广播剧制作团队在中国政府的支持下，会对着所有的人叫唤”把钱放在桌上，让所有人看看清楚1”。

首先，这是在说“把老人留下的东西都放在台面上，让所有人看清楚” 所呈现的是那些和我有血缘关系的人因为不懂什么是信托及其法律条文定义而产生的愤怒。我听说已经是解释了又解释，和我血缘关系近的一些还是一腔的愤怒。
1）我为什么坚持是信托继承而不是在分家产？是否是在掠夺别人的继承权？

• 信托继承是我的2004年继承的法律类别，是由法律条文定义的，不是由我坚持的。所继承财产在信托设立时就已经指定给予了我（家族名字“女掌”)，所以不是掠夺别人的继承权，也不需要将那些信托放在台面上让任何人看清楚。
• 举例：协助设立信托是一个律师事务所的日常法律业务。如果你去一家律师事务所，要求在50年后给予你指定的小孩100万元（连本带息），律师就会要求你在离开律师事务所之前交付100万元的本金，不然律师就不会允许你带走为你所准备的信托文件，否则律师就会因为这一份信托文件而在50年后欠了你所指定的小孩100万元的债务。
• 信托的登记制度也体现了法律对信托受益人利益的保障 (万一委托人或受益人丢失了信托文件）。

2）为什么坚持我自己是唯一受益人？

• 唯一受益人是由信托的设立委托人在其亲自签名的委托书里所指定的，不是由我自己坚持的。所以是按照遗嘱继承，不是擅自独吞，也不需要将所继承的信托放在台面上让任何人看清楚。

其次，所呈现的是那些和我没有血缘关系的人因为有关1950年关闭上海的股票证卷交易所的一些疑问而产生的愤怒。

1950年左右，新中国的上海市政府派了一队持枪的军人强制关闭了上海的证卷交易所。据报道，除了一些粗暴声音的命令“把随身的东西都放在桌上”，整个过程很紧张但是还算平和，但那些股票投资人离开的时候都是眼含泪水两手空空。

就此关闭过程所引发的一些困扰是在80年代中国重新开放了上海的股票证卷交易所，新股票的上市（IPO）造就了一批又一批的中国富豪。从那时起，不只是一些上海的零星有钱人，而是全国人民都在开始质疑1950年关闭上海股票证卷交易所的时候，究竟哪些被没收的价值连城的股票都是怎么处理的？

每一张股票证书代表的是一个投资人对于一家公司的股份拥有权，拥有一家公司多少百分比的股票，也就是意味着拥有的多少百分比的这家公司。1950年的那天，当那些投资人离开上海的股票证卷交易所时，他们留下的不是这些股票证书的票面上的现金价值，而是这家公司的所有权。从那天起，所有这些公司的股票都作废了，所有这些公司都被充公成为国营企业， 也就是，从第二天起，这些公司被国家工作人员进驻，那些公司企业的利润也不再存入那些投资人自己的银行账号，而是存入由国家财政部财政厅所指定的银行账号。整个过程都没有现金交易，就只有公司被充公。

有关的愤怒就是因为不明白那天所没收的价值连城的股票都被谁给拿走了，又给藏在了哪里。但是那天并没有任何股票被兑现，就只是这些公司被中国政府没收了，公司的经营利润从此归国家所有。

----2019年1月17日。

01-16-2019 Same high school producing team ---- today's and 2016's team （南师大附中制作组）

Heard this morning's broadcasting's lead editor was Chinese Propaganda Minister Wang，Yang's daughter or daughter-in-law (据说是汪洋的女儿或者媳妇做的主编剪辑), the entire producing team was associated with the high school I graduated from (南京师范大学附属中学). Participating producers include Fudan University's Business Professor Yan's son (复旦大学经济学院严教授的儿子)。 This Professor Yan is the person that, in a broadcasting a couple months ago, has demanded a "Lee's Family Trust" set up in 1941,  to be transferred to him because his grandfather already took and kept the 10,000 Dayang that he was requested to send to this Trust in Hong Kong in 1945 by a rich lady in Shanghai. I heard the propaganda in China has been that I had publicly robbed Professor Yan's family wealth because I inherited this Trust in 2004 as the sole beneficiary great-granddaughter that was specified by the settler (my great-grandmother, the one who raised my father under her own roof, and also the one who was the next door neighbor to my grandparents' family). I heard this "Lee's Family Trust" was sized 60,000 Dayang in 1941.

I was harassed by local same high school "harassing team" so that I did not hear what was broadcasted this morning, but I heard the style is the same as 2016's Chinese producing team, which is using one different voice to read one differ scripted line to make-up a featured story that absolutely has nothing to do with the featured person in the story, but each scripted line is read by a person who is reading this person's own situation of the moment to fit this style in a "reality show eligible". This team's such producing efforts is the reason I accused Chines government intentionally blackmailed to threat and to demand money. （制作风格就是编纂剧本后，由演员一人读一句，而每人读的那一句台词也很符合该演员的“朗读时刻”时的真实生活实情，但整个编纂后由朗读而成的广播剧故事却与所讲述的该故事的主要人物没有任何一点关系。据说这是中国制作团队所能够理解的什么是“真实剧”。而我本人就一直因为这种编纂而成的“假真实”而自2016年起就一直指责中国政府是故意抹黑造谣以制造事件实施敲诈绑架勒索财物。据说国内的宣传基调自2016年起就和广播剧的2016年制作基调始终保持一致。）

I heard this producing team has the understanding this is lawful because this is how British Royals blackmailed my name through patched-up some so stuck-on so unwanted stories, obviously, Chinese Foreign Department has not informed them that British Royals and media have already revealed the real European female featured in those stories in 2017 to clarify the matter. （我听说制作团队认为这是国外的通行做法，英国王室就是这么编了一个故事痛骂我方敏是个没人要的烂货的呀。很明显，中国外交部还没有通知他们，英国王室及各国媒体早在2017年就已经在整个欧洲，美洲，大洋洲，亚洲，中东各地区揭示了那些故事中的一个真实的欧洲女性以澄清事件。）

----Jan. 16th, 2019

能够想像，如果我有钱，作为同是南师大附中毕业的其他人，会希望有个什么可帮助的资源，比如说海外留学的助学金之类的。可我听说的，南师大附中毕业的，和中国外交部的抱怨类似，就没人认为区区一点海外留学的助学金是够胃口的，想要的，是海外生活终身所需的供养，至少每年几万美金或者几十万美金，再加房子或者豪宅，甚至必须是海外超级富豪级别的生活水准。所以，只要听说是我的钱就必须全部拿光，否则根本不够。

我听说的，这拿钱活动，根本就不需要我本人同意或者听说或者知道，他们就是直接通过在银行，公司，或者政府机关之类的找个工作，只要听说有可能是我的钱，虽然根本就不在我的名下，而是很明确地在别人名下，他们照样就直接从公司呆账里或者银行里拿钱，弄到海外一片惊恐，人人自危。以前，要是听说有人居然作为银行工作人员，直接在银行里把别人户头的钱先挪后转，就转账到那人自己账户名下，作为老百姓，根本就不会听，因为美国是个法治国家，哪里会有这种做事情，现在态度是，只要听说就赶紧报警，万一警察还没听说。据说南师大附中相关的，参与类似活动的人员很多很广。

还有一个矛盾焦点就是我的广播剧收入。我听说美国的广播公司已经特意解释了，我的主要角色收入是完全按照美国相关法律的规定而决定的提成分配比例，我听说在中国也有类似的行规方式决定的提成分配比例，从来不是中国根本就没听说过类似的提成分配。电视剧主角和主要配角，以及跑龙套的，就是类似有主角的工资再加电视剧集销售的百分比提成，主要配角的工资（或有或没有的百分比提成），以及跑龙套的就只有每集参与才有的那种台湾人所俗称的车马费。我听说的南师大附中相关人员的最大投诉就是，他们不愿意作为某一些剧集的录制参与人员也就是类似跑龙套的参与程度，就只拿车马费，而是只要参与就必须提领主角级别的广播剧销售收入提成。估计要是不能从广播公司拿，他们就特别委屈所以就直接从银行里或者其他公司呆帐里拿，胃口大的实在是某明奇妙，贪得不得了，吓死人。

----2019年1月16日。

01-15-2019 Do I have Trust Inheriting? （我是否有继承信托？）

Heard this morning's saying about my intellectual incomes.
My answer: I can't wait to receive them.

I heard if safe for me to possess money in my own name has been the concern, I say now is much improved that I am no longer concerned if my mailbox or my apartment can be opened forcefully but so comfortably right in front of me or my neighbors. So, I am safe as my neighbors now, to receive checks or inquiry letters, and to have some cash in my apartment.
----Jan. 15th, 2019

Heard the Chinese community's anger is still if I have inherited money or financially independent.
My answer: I heard JD has announced Trust registration information can be verified for my most recent 5 generations' grandfathers'. I heard some Chinese angry that all are partial information that does not include current bank accounts information nor current investing activities.

Being the sole beneficiary person of all those Trusts, I state it is not necessary for anyone to know any current financial information of any of those Trusts, as long as it is verifiable that I am the sole beneficiary person and my Trust inheriting are both factual truths.

I heard the prints do not look professionally formal is the reason for the doubts if this is a piece of joky information. I say it is the original print0format from (possibly) a UNIX computer system which is authentic original print-out information. （听说中国政府机关有向美国司法部查询所公布的信托信息，但怀疑所提供的打印件是否不正式不正规而是在开玩笑。我估计那是电脑一种大机器系统的原始记录的打印格式就是这种样子的。这种电脑系统不是适合个人使用的视窗系统，但也是电脑系统，适合大规模资料贮存，多用于大机构大公司，是否如此应该可以通过中国国内的电脑系统核实的。）

I heard following are included in the information, together with me being the sole beneficiary person and in which year. These three generation grandfathers were the three-generation donators of Chinese colleges in the Republic China time.（ 台湾应该有方治兴，方励其和方智仁是三代祖父子关系的户籍登记资料，中国大陆有方智仁和我的祖父孙女关系的户籍登记记录，我继承的是他们为我所设立的信托）

My grandfather Fang, Zhiren (祖父方智仁，1965年去世） $15M美金 (exchange rate 1:$3)
My great-grandfather Fang, Liqi（曾祖父方励其(第七子），1930年去世）$11M美金 (exchange rate 1:$1)
My great-great-grandfather Fang, Zhixin （曾曾祖父方治兴，1907-1911年左右去世) $15M美金 (exchange rate 1:$1)
...
----Jan. 15th, 2019

01-14-2019 Who is doing the propaganda that I should be evicted from the U.S. if I dare to complain about public service?

What I have complained about public service? and Why?

I heard, to the government sector of the Boston city and Massachusetts state, "who is the wife to a Ford" is the critical decision factor to the matter if I could possibly have inherited Trusts from my own birth family,  or if I am allowed to have my own making to be owned by myself. I heard it is the same critically important in government sector in China as well. Why???

I heard it has been very confusing who is the real authentic wife to a Ford, a Chinese Miss Zhu or an American (Miss) Juliet, but no matter how confusing it might be, why my own birth Chinese grandfathers' money I inherited or my own making should be whoever's to take in the United States or in the People's Republic of China? and why this taking over without authorization has been supported by some government employees? And why shouldn't I complain about public service from the government sector because of my such severely impacted unhappy experiences?

This morning, I was asking my own attorneys through the recording to my own smartphone about why I can't receive my $400Million yearly providing. I heard rumors that TS announced each $400Million for all five years has been clarified my lawful money verified and transmitted into 5 of my banking estate accounts which mean each bank account should use my name(pseudo or real) listed as owner of the account, I was never asked to provide my own banking information but I have the direct express card. And I heard there was another TS announcement a couple of months later that I (not specifically spelled, so, possibly me) may never get any of these $400Million per year but paid service-fee for each year can be returned or given to me, which means after losing each $400 Million a year, TS can return 400,000 per month service fee. I heard the service fee charged by TS is supposed to be 5% at least, and I heard there is some extra donation to TS that is matched and beyond the difference, well, I assume that is implied as won't be returned because that is a donation.

Some said as long as the money is from some foreign investors, the U.S. certainly can understand this is beneficial to the U.S. How? when I am a U.S. citizen? when the paying money is from these U.S. companies local business profiting? So, some U.S. money that is hard earned by some U.S. companies which should be given to a U.S. citizen has got lost in the U.S., even though it is according to some foreigners' instruction, why this can be understood as beneficial to the U.S.? How this logic can be understood?

I was asking my attorneys exactly what is going on and gets agitated because I just can't get expected money while it seems everyone in Boston including MA government sectors keep saying impatiently"You don't have any money because Rockefellers already said so loudly, you are not associated is loudly from Fords as well.", so, I heard this question "why don't you evict yourself from the United States if you don't like this government?" Am I the one being ridiculous?

I did complaint about Rockefellers regarding their possible involvement of inappropriateness. I heard R claimed this is hostility, I complained why they took my money and claimed I have no money as if I have ever lived on their money? As long as it can be certain I did not claim their money, even though Rockefellers may not know if I am lawful to claim I inherited money from my own birth Chinese grandfathers, my own making from radio program broadcasting should be easy to be understood as my own lawful making, right? R took every penny of my making from the radio program broadcasting.

I heard that saying it is understood that even though it has been all about my life experiences, but the radio program's success is all because of Rockefellers' name, or Fords' name. So, I have to ask why they can have this assumption about their own importance if none of them is a pathetic psycho? When everyone in the U.S. already heard the truth of their real romances, and when whoever in the entire world that heard of their names also heard so many rumors about their true romances already, Why would anyone only listen to the radio program because of their huge importance would waste their time to listen to those fake romance stories, even though it was only a couple of months for each of the two important names while the successful broadcasting was over 10 years? 

 The following has been my statement since June 30th of 2004. It is not hard at all for Rockefellers or Fords, or Waltons, to verify all these money is never owned by any of them, right? The same with Ford's association, it should \not be hard to verify that my inheriting is not associated with the truth if I have ever been associated with any Ford, right?

My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth. My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years. 
----Jan. 7th, 2019

----Jan. 14th, 2019

I heard this article pissed off everybody, well, I don't live on their money certainly means I speak up comfortably if they pissed me off.
----Jan. 14th, 2019

01-12-2019 Knit-top incident in UB in 1998 (硚口大学的不雅衣服事件）

01-12-2019 Knit-top incident in UB in 1998 (硚口大学的不雅衣服事件）


Heard about this morning's broadcasting, it seems still very confusing. So, I just keep these statements here.
My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth. My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years. 
----Jan. 7th, 2019

Heard it is clarified “the same person" in the rumor is never her husband, never her romantic partner, etc., No contact with her since 1999, know nothing about her romance. 
----Jan. 8th, 2019

Heard my casual dress incident in the University of Bridgeport on a 1998's Sunday has been a wildfire rumor in the Chinese community. Exactly, what was the story?

I was in a weekend computer science program in Springfield campus of the University of Bridgeport in the summer of 1998. As usual, I woke up at 7AM after an 11-hours weekday shift in a Chinese restaurant to catch the commuter train to school, well, it was summer, what I grabbed from my trunk was a normal knit-top that I put on without a Virginia Secret nor its equivalent underneath. I was not harassed at all on the train, in the classroom, and on my way home, but I did notice the insides could be seen if I stand straight during the lunch hour. This was rumored the famous indecent dress story in school.

I was lucky to be my carefree character to live in the United States that only police officers cared if it was appropriate even if I was completely without my entire knit-top, but I was not carefree about the dress code but carefree about what I can put on. I once joked that I possibly can be a pioneer for an exotic style dress as long as that is my taste of exotic but not the exposure.

I heard this incident has a wildfire sex-offender equivalent rumor since 2004, maybe because I was with class 4 at the time, which this entire confusion of "who is who and what is what" originated.

----Jan. 12th, 2019

（听说查过了，传说中的“同一个人”从来不是女方的丈夫或者女方的恋爱男朋友之类的。久未联络，真是完全不知女方的婚恋情况。----2019年1月8日）

(听说女方和南京的华姓是三等亲关系。很烦，女的自己弄不清谁是丈夫，什么钱是夫家钱，可是只要做丈夫的还没继承财产，也应该是由弄得清什么是自家钱，什么不是自家钱的公公婆婆处理啊，哪里需要做儿媳妇的满大街只要是钱就说是她自己夫家钱了。----2019年1月11日）

有关硚口大学的”1998年的不雅衣服事件”，就是一件普通的针织短袖上衣，空心穿着，衣服有点小所以穿着有点紧绷了。当时我还是在硚口大学的四班上课，当时硚口大学春田分校的华人学生也大都是居住在纽约及新泽西州的，应该很了解我那天的衣着在美国，至少是美国的东部地区，根本也没什么了不起的，就是华人看着有点突兀而已，其它什么的，性疯狂啦，暴露狂啦，淫妇想勾引啦等等就一点都谈不上了。

听说89年学运是我在硚口大学上学时穿了一件”不雅衣服事件”的主要传播者（纽约新泽西确实有大批的89年学运），据说这届中国政府都是89年学运的同情者也是我被中国政府痛打的原因。我听说是因为我方敏老是用中华人民共和国的口气发表言论，让89年学运很气愤。

我方敏的回应：我从2004年起就一直强调我是方敏，我是唐太宗李世民的继承人，我所发表的言论都是以方敏名义发表，也从未回避我方敏就是唐太宗李世民的继承人，可方敏或者唐太宗这两个名字都不是中华人民共和国的名称标识啊？为什么说我以方敏名义所发表言论就是在以中华人民共和国名义表达立场？

有关”89年的时候也是如此“论点，我想请问89年学运:
1：请问你们是否认可当时的中共中央及中央军委对中国960万平方公里土地拥有合法领导权？
2：请问你们是否认可89年清理天安门广场的军事行动是由中共中央政府授权的合法管理行为？
3：请问你们是否认可我方敏作为在校学生，有法律权利及自由向当时的中共中央政府畅谈我对89年学运的想法？
4：30年后的2019年，请问你们是以什么样的阅历经历，认为当时的中国政府是管理过当而且这份过当是由我方敏造成的？请提出或理论或事实做为依据，而非只是一味空空洞洞的指责指控？

----2019年1月12日。

01-07-2019 Bridgeport University Graduated Chinese Mrs. Ford, whom? maiden name is Zhu Hongqing （真正的福特夫人其实是北京医学院药学系1990届的朱红箐？）

Big news: 

To all University of Bridgeport's insider-alumni: This is no big secret anymore!!!!

（Heard it is clarified “the same person" in the rumor is never her husband, never her romantic partner, etc., No contact with her since 1999, know nothing about her romance. ----updated on Jan. 8th, 2019)

My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth.

My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.

请告知所有知情的中华人民共和国中共中央政治局, 中国外交部，中共中央宣传部，中共中央军委，中国文化部：这已经不再是天大的秘密了。

请告知所有上海医科大学的知情校友：这已经不再是天大的秘密了。

（听说查过了，传说中的“同一个人”从来不是女方的丈夫或者女方的恋爱男朋友之类的。久未联络，真是完全不知女方的婚恋情况。----2019年1月8日）

(听说女方和南京的华姓是三等亲关系。很烦，女的自己弄不清谁是丈夫，什么钱是夫家钱，可是只要做丈夫的还没继承财产，也应该是由弄得清什么是自家钱，什么不是自家钱的公公婆婆处理啊，哪里需要做儿媳妇的满大街只要是钱就说是她自己夫家钱了。----2019年1月11日）


1: Heard a Chinese female from the same class in the same year that I graduated from University Bridgeport married "Charles Ford". The Chinese female is, rumored, a father-side fourth cousin to Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, and a father-side first cousin to the famous denounced descendent of Ming dynasty Emperor, a Mr. Zhu from Chinese Military.   (Never a typo but a rumor with a long-time joke who has the correct family name)

2: Heard this is the Chinese female who lived near 82nd street in Queens in 1997 who graduated in 1990 from the Beijing Medical University's School of Pharmacy, her maid named is Zhu, Hongqing.（据说是北京医学院（北京协和医学院？）药学系90届的朱红罄(?). I graduated from Shanghai Medical University's Pharmacy School in 1990.

3: Rumored there was a special open to the public wedding reception(?) in 2011 in Shanghai, China,  and it was rumored an open to public reception because both had no Shanghai local association at the time.

4: Rumored this "Charles Ford" is the person visited University Bridgeport's 2000 commencement and recognized by the same Chinese female at the moment.

• I was the person never heard of such incident from the same commencement, from the fourth class nor from the fifth or sixth, until it was broadcasted is a true statement. 
• I have no association with the entire 4th class of UB's Springfield campus weekend program since 1999 is a True statement. I registered my remaining courses with the 5th or 6th class from the same program.
• The incidence I was blocked is a true report, and I was not with the graduating students during the entire commencement is a true statement. 
• So, I know nothing about what happened during the UB's year 2000 commencement is a True statement.

5: Rumored this is the person who visited Jennifer's apartment at 140 E46 street in October of 1996 and the same person broadcasted on the radio.

6: Heard this "Charles Ford" is not biologically associated with any of my possible biological birth child(ren) from pregnancy mother(s)' help.

7: My 2004 Inheriting has no association with Ford wealth, nor Rockefeller wealth, nor Walton wealth.
My Trusts' announced investments in the U.S. have not changed any portion in its entire investing-company-chain for an accumulated over 600 years.

----January 7th, 2019

不知为什么，这个婚姻据说2007年就已经在纽约注册，一直都是纽约市的婚姻记录上的有效婚姻，就是从未在福特企业公开，也从未在华人圈子里公开，就是有一堆一堆知道此内情的人在我周围活动，不知为什么。

还有，2004年7月1日我开电讯会议那天，那女的也在场，据说那女的和别人说：又没人知道是谁在继承财产，怎么就不可能是她呐？她的父亲好像是中国宣传部的，这次广播剧上中国政府的高调痛打就是中国宣传部牵头的，在国内也是同样的宣传基调。

很奇怪的，中共中央宣传部国内国外的宣传基调：中国政府一副腔调好像我欠了中国政府什么大钱了，不是撒谎其实根本没钱，就是如果真有钱就必须把钱拿出来，不给就是不行；福特家就是一堆女人在花枝招展的表达强悍，是真正的了不起，真正的很能干；洛克菲勒家的就是气势汹汹的强调只要我有钱就只能是偷了他们家的财产。

有人一直问我，为什么就只痛骂中国政府，那你们看看这三拨人，我最应该骂谁？福特家莺歌燕舞的出现，除非我真的是弄不清谁是谁了，否则我骂她们干嘛呀？洛克菲勒家的，我就是一直吵一个电话都没打过，那有可能花到洛家的钱？那你们听听中国政府的气势，我还会怎么处理？

如果认为我有钱就只能是洛克菲勒家给的裤裆钱，为什么福特家的老婆就是够资格抢啊？不是据说已经就是最富的那个福特了吗？我是一直奇怪，我要是和福特家的人已经生了孩子，怎么各个都认定洛克菲勒家的那个就是一定要大把给我钱花，还拒不承认，居然公开撒谎说从没给过我钱？据说南师大附中毕业的，就是认为只要是我的钱就只能是洛克菲勒家的这人给的，所以各个南师大附中毕业的，都可以直接从银行里提领就可以，洛克菲勒家是不会过问的。据说银行里任何户头任何人名下的钱都有可能是我的钱，也就是说只要是钱，南师大附中的就可以直接从银行里拿，也是吓死人的传言。

听听就知道今天早上的英文博客为什么这么写了：前一阵子，据说和我在波城生活密切相关的一个什么机构，整个一个电脑信息中心或电脑房，整个部门一共就8个人，一个是南师大附中毕业的，7个是桥口大学毕业的。吓坏所有人。我经常去的图书馆，据说电脑房也是有几个是桥口大学毕业的。我是在麻州的波士顿哎，有名的大学城。怎么都是康州我以前读电脑的这个大学毕业的，这个大学离波士顿有2个小时以上的车程呐？就我现在的住处，出门一条小路，小路左边和小路右边的两个邻居就是两个名校，还都有电脑专业。真是不知道还有多少类似传言，真是能吓死人。那个女的，就是福特老婆，就是和我在这个硚口大学同一个班级里学电脑的，她是北京一个医学院的药学系的，我是上海的，她和我是同年毕业的，但她不是药理专业。

----2019年1月7日。

01-06-2019 和南京方面的矛盾(8)-- 《Two hundred years punishment 王博真夫妻及王家要求》

Heard this morning's broadcasting about 200 years' in-prison time.
I heard this is the law item applicable to anyone who seriously intends to own a company illegally.

Why I am not concerned? Because I am lawfully inherited some Trusts that have been investing in some companies is the reason that I am expecting to receive my living expenses that already paid-out by those companies as their investor, which means it is so clear that I never have any intention to own those companies illegally.

Those payments I have been expecting are all paid-out according to each of those companies lawfully registered investor's instruction, and all those instructing investors have not changed their investment share in each of those paying companies entire upstream investing chain for over accumulated 600 years is the reason that I claim I am never provided for by any rich male but Trusts set up by my own ancient birth grandfathers.

By the way, I was asked where this radio program has been broadcasting? I heard it has been tour-broadcasting, similar to what is commonly known for concerts but on radios.

----Jan. 6th, 2019

南京方面说我家一直是由王博真夫妻一家资助生活的，谁说的？
我的回应：王博真1990退休前江苏省人民医院的退休护士（不是护士长），她丈夫苏家隆是1956年左右就因病退休的中学老师，他们家是在1982年就领养了王淑秋作为他们自己的孩子。他们家的经济情况就可以凭中国的工资标准判定了。

我母亲高中毕业后做出纳，1980年代后才升为初级会计，1988年失去南京市汽车运输公司的正式工作，无退休金。我父亲是南京大学毕业的，1992-1993年退休前是中国科学院紫金山天文台的研究编辑人员，我是1990年大学毕业，1996年离开中国来美，我们家的经济情况也应该可以从中国的工资标准判定，请问我们家为何需要由王博真夫妻两个资助才能吃口饱饭？

我母亲确实是因为王博真才有了机会离开山东老家，但我母亲所有的兄弟姊妹当中，只有我母亲是必须做所有家务包括力所不能及的，才有可能留在南京而不被赶回山东老家，这是我母亲对于王淑秋确实是一个被领养的女儿待遇而一直耿耿于怀的原因。

所有的矛盾就在这里，是谁在坚持说我们家亏欠了王博真夫妻两个的抚养费用？我们家里谁需要他们出资抚养？我们家的气愤就是从没要求过，就送来好一大包的厕所草纸（省一点是一点)，还带着血迹的医院都已经不再使用的床单(垫在褥子下面总是可以暖和点），生了蛆的泡菜（好好煮煮还是可以省点菜钱的）。。。我们家是谢谢真心的好意不抱怨什么，怎么就成了我们家欠了他们的生活费了？给我的压岁钱，也就是我母亲的兄弟姊妹也给的出手，我大学毕业后一年会有两至三次每次几十元的零花钱，去了会有好吃的（也就是愿意拿出来招待我这个客人的），但怎么就成了我们家欠了他们一家生活费了？

在我母亲所有的兄弟姊妹当中，只有我们家被要求必须永远记得我母亲当年是如何离开山东老家的，我还必须不要自己的母亲王博贤而把王博真一家当自己亲娘，是谁这么花痴? 是谁认定了就只需坚决不准我有就会“抢了”王博真家的任何东西，王家人再齐心坚决痛骂我亲妈王博贤是个婊子，一齐栽赃说我是苏家隆下的种，就这么着，就可以让王博真成了亲娘待遇了？我方敏坚决拒绝。

还有，一口一声的，如果我方敏敢不按要求给钱，就让全世界都看着王家上下，齐声为王博真不能拥有亲娘待遇而痛哭而悲壮，看谁还会愿意做方敏的朋友？我方敏态度，我方敏立场就是，投诉这分明是在恐吓威胁以实施敲诈勒索。你们可以听听，王家上下，提的都是什么要求？表达的都是什么愤怒？都是为什么原因在悲壮着？

我听到的，就是我（婚姻）家，王家人必须想来就来，而且是如果我的婚床实在不能上去躺躺（不是肮脏的躺法），那我的卧室隔壁就必须放张床给他们；我（婚姻）家的东西，王家必须够资格捡好的拿。。我方敏态度，王博真自己很分得清谁是她自己的家里人，我方敏也分得很清楚，所以我方敏坚决拒绝这种过分的要求，我方敏坚决拒绝任何类似过分的要求。

不管王家及其所有亲朋如何诅咒我方敏断子绝孙，我方敏坚决拒绝领养王博真苏家隆的（领养）女儿王（苏）淑秋所育小孩，我方敏坚决拒绝领养王家及王家所有亲朋的任何小孩，我方敏坚决拒绝领养方家及方家所有亲朋的任何小孩。

我方敏拒绝领养任何非我方敏本人所亲生的子女*。

*听说，在美国，经代理孕母协助所生的亲生子女，也需要经过法律上的领养手续才可以建立父母子女法律关系。

----2019年1月6日。

01-04-2019 我的亲朋送礼计划 (14) ---- My online gifting idea -- 《Commercial Registry & Ownership Confusion, Trust Registry& Sole Beneficiary》

I heard it is broadcasted "(The paid-out radio company's major featured person fee is) not your income" this morning, I heard it was not from the paying radio company but from a representative of a company that is set up by the person who deposited some portion of this money to own. I already asked laws help on why I have not received this paid-out-to-me money yet.
----Jan. 4th, 2019

I was asked what is the commercial registry, and what is the company(corporate) law?
My response:

An example: If you intend to open a coffee shop, the first permission you will seek is the commercial registry, and then the IRS' tax-id, and you need both commercial registration certificate and tax-id to apply for the health department's permission.

The commercial registration certificate is the government's record of this coffee shop's ownership, the commercial registry related laws are all about this coffee shop's ownership. The corporate (company) laws are about how to operate this coffee shop.

I think in the United States, because the land of North America was a colony to UK and France, etc. before its 1776's independence, so that commercial registries for all those companies operating on this North America soil before 1776 were in each of these countries' general consulate (convoy), but must have been re-registered in the United States commercial department(?) since 1776 when the U.S. established its own commercial registry laws. So, it is correct to say commercial registry laws has a history for over 400 years in North America.

I heard a lot of annoyances expressed against me keep saying I have inherited money, I don't consider speaking up my true inheriting experience inappropriate at all in the U.S., plus, with law enforcement's help, it can be verified if I am provided for by these paying companies even I haven't received anything yet,  and please correct me in an email if your verification proves that inaccuracy in my blog articles is beyond informational purpose.

So, I am asking if these annoyances are because of those American companies' ownership confusion?I am a beneficiary person of some Trusts that have been investing these American companies through its at least 6 countries away upstream investor, so please direct your ownership-confusion to your concerning company directly, and I think lawful ownership commercial registry record can be verified from government's record as well. Thanks.
----Jan. 4th, 2019

Heard annoying rumors of promises to don't ever let me have my money.
My response: What these rumored promises mean in the U.S? First of all, this is a crime of discrimination against me.

Promise never to let laws prevail? What kind of rumor is this? This promise means the promising person's police badge would be taken off (badge-off) immediately in the U.S. In the young United States time, a police badge means sincere sworn to protect and to enforce, that those police officers stories have been all over cowboy-movies to praise how bravely they were to face challenges of loaded guns. Don't ever consider this kind of promises a joke to a law enforcing personnel or any government employee in the U.S.
----Jan. 4th, 2019

What is Trust Registry and Sole Beneficiary Person? 什么是信托登记和信托的唯一收益人
My answer: Trust Registry is the record of a Trust which records who is the settler, who is(are) this Trust's settler's specified beneficiary person(s), who is(are) this Trust's entrusting attorney(s), and how much money has been entrusted by this Trust's settler, etc. 信托登记是一个信托的登记记录，记录内容包括信托的设立人，信托设立人所指定的受益人，信托的受委托律师，以及所信托的财产有多少，等等。

If this Trust's settler has only specified one person to receive all of the entrusted money of this Trust, this one person is the sole beneficiary person of this Trust. 如果一个信托的设立人只指定了一个人接受所信托的所有财产，这一个人就被称为唯一受益人。

Please consult the attorney of your own if you are concerned about being a co-beneficiary person of any Trust I inherited. I heard the most recent 5 generation's grandfathers' Trusts have registry record verified that I am the sole beneficiary person of all five. And, I don't think anyone can be a beneficiary person specified in the same Trust with me when birthmark is how I was specified.如果你对你自己是否有可能也是我所继承的信托的受益人，请咨询你自己的律师。我听说最近代的五代爷爷给我的信托等级都已经核实过了，我确实是这五代爷爷所设立信托的唯一受益人。而且，我也不认为胎记掌纹是指定我是受益人的情况下，也不可能需要让我和其他人共一个信托（因为爷爷在当年就可以从一开始就可以把钱分开，就可以分别给，再分别信托给同一个律师或者不同律师就可以，也就是多写一张信托委托书而已）。
----Jan. 4th, 2019

01-03-2019 the U.S. Treasury Department's Christmas bonus is not from my money

01-03-2019 the U.S. Treasury Department's Christmas bonus is not from my money


Heard this morning's broadcasting of U.S. Treasury Department's Christmas bonus.
My response: I don't know yet why it is so confused to be associated with my money. I heard it is not some intellectual income nor any paid-out for my exclusive usage money. So, I know that is definitely not my money

I only have two sources of cash-money, intellectual incomes, and paid-out living expenses. My inherited Trusts are in-entrusting which means all payments are strictly followed what was decided on July 1st of 2004's entrusting teleconference, and not easy for myself as the sole beneficiary person to increase the decided amount of each's yearly payment. So, the U.S. Treasury Department's Christmas bonus is nothing to do with me money.

Remember the pattern whoever's changed heart is so confusing if associated with me? Is this seems the same pattern about whoever's money now? Is this to arouse anger how dare TS employees to take whoever's lawful money? Or to confuse the public if I possibly have any lawful money? Is this the same expectation as all those confused romances broadcasting?

Also, I heard about rumored IRS internal broadcasting of the statement "known reason for income-depositing substitution & unchangeable permanently" without any further explanations. So, I asked this question to the laws: why being the person most impacted by this intellectual-income depositing substitution, I am not part of the informed group even after I filed complaints about this substituting my name titled on the check when depositing? Why the lawful ownership of some money can be so confusing in the media industry?
----Jan. 3rd, 2019

I heard the saying how I speak up on the Boston radio can actually get myself some money and change the ownership of an American company that has been historically owned by O'Connors?
I have explained this already that no lawful-ownership has ever changed no matter how long O'Connor have been confused, or how loudly I spoke my side stories. The confused company still owned by its historically lawfully registered owner which is that American company's British investor-company for over 400 years.

I heard: O'Connors have been confused because of their family's over 50 years hard savings. Their two generation stubborn grandfathers insisted on to invest in this not-for-sell American company by refusing to take salary payments or by refusing to sign the salary-receipts of each's 6-months-salaries per year for over 50 years. These two generations of O'Connors' families lived on thrift half-salary for over 50 years has been the reason for their confusion and all their anger in their yearly meeting with the American company. The arguments have been "We are the investors" from O'Connors replied with "This is the company never for sale" from the American company; and "Why you took the money" from the O'Connors replied with "Because you refused to sign the salary receipts" from the American company. I heard all these 50 years salaries had been saved in the bank, and all the savings had given to the O'Connor family with the first installment of their agreed upon providing from the American company.

I was confused because everybody says O'Connor families own the 100% of the American company I thought I inherited in 2004, my anxiety was where would be my inherited share if so? It turned out what I inherited is a Trust that has been investing for centuries in this American company through its upstream investors. The company I confused is this American company's American investor-company. My expected money is the yearly providing from the Trust I inherited in 2004 as its sole beneficiary person. I have not received the expected money because of all these confusion.

Why the government didn't stop both parties real owning efforts on the media? I assume because nobody knew which American company I was confused but my inheriting experience in 2004 is real, or this assumption is applicable to both parties? Both parties stopped arguing after this American company's British investor-company explained about this American company's investing history and about my expected paid-put-already is upon its upstream investor's instruction.

The media can certainly verify the commercial registry record of this American company's ownership which should have not been changed by all these confusion.

----Jan. 3rd, 2019


I was asked why I haven't say Merry Christmas or Happy New Year to my biological children? Currently, I am eligible to choose to protect their privacy over my needed public explanation. Currently, in their associated matters, it is very clear that they do have a resourceful mother who can protect them no matter how confusing it can be about if they have a father care about them at all.
----Jan. 3rd, 2019

01-02-2019 我的亲朋送礼计划 (12-A) ---- My online gifting idea -- 《About my lawful investor income tax rate》

I heard my yesterday's blog aroused a lot of curiosity if the validation is needed. My understanding was if that was because the commercial registry law has been around for about 400 years in history (600 years in my previous blog article is the years has been in the same dynasty), but my grandfather's Trust, that I am the sole beneficiary person of, was set up 800-1300 years ago. I heard it is concluded that "the validation for that 600-800 years' investor-ownership is not necessary", because my ancient family portraits and other hard factual evidence already made up that 600-800 years historical gap. So, I heard it is announced this morning that, it is concluded that all five years'(2015-2019) all providing-payments are lawful payments qualified for investor income tax rate.

I heard this lawful investor-ownership was announced with a "so-annoying" tone, I understand it is from the annoyingness that I was never the person who contributed to any of these companies great history. I respect this is a true statement and I respect all those contributions. I am willing to contribute to the futures of these companies and I already have started such efforts since 2004.
----January 2nd, 2019

I heard the five years paying companies' upstream Trust-investors have been:

• The first year's settler was Tang dynasty's Emperor Xuanzong（唐玄宗李隆基), at about 1300 years ago. The known heir of the Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong(唐太宗李世民), both featured in those published paintings which were copies from the digital version of those original ancient family portraits.

• The second year's settler was painter Zhang, Guotao（国画大师张国焘), at about 800 years ago. He was a famous painter in China, one of whose paintings was discovered with the royal collection stamp that cost all his non-heir children been prosecuted by the Emperor of the Song dynasty. I heard this painter's private (royal) collection stamp is identified as the same or characteristically same to the royal collection stamps from the Chinese Tang dynasty and the Chinese Southern Tang dynasty.

• The third year's settler was Southern Tang dynasty's Emperor Yuanzong (南唐中主唐元宗李璟), and at about 1000 years ago.

• The fourth and fifth years' settlers were father and son. The father was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wenzong(唐文宗李昂) and the son was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wuzong(唐武宗李瀍), at about 1200 years ago. These two Emperors are historically known heir-grandsons of famous Chinese Tang dynasty's Emperor Taizong and Emperor Xuanzong.

----Jan. 2nd, 2019

USJD and my entrusting attorneys, who is better?
My answer: I am a U.S. citizen and I am the sole beneficiary person.
----January 2nd, 2019

Regarding the anger why it has to be my money. 为什么这钱就只能归你所有的愤怒？
My answer: I understand this can be angry when someone is in the situation that in need of some money or wish to live in a better life, and I understand anger may out of the conceptual understanding that money represents problems-solved or a better life to all those people who share this anger. My own anger has been why it has to be my lawful money? So, let me materialize this anger to illustrate if this anger is about "someone's lawful money but not necessarily specifically my lawful money"我能理解当某人需要钱或者想过一份好的生活时，会有一些钱能解决问题及有钱就能过好日子的理解，并由此而产生一些愤怒，我的愤怒就是为什么想要钱就应该还必须拿我方敏合法的财产及收入？我来展示一下你们是否“只想要别人的合法的钱财但不一定是我的合法钱财”。

Illustration 1:
If you are in a grocery store, you saw an obviously fat wallet displayed casually in your next person's shopping cart, and if you were emotional with this anger "Why it has to be your money?", what will you do? 如果你是正在超市买东西，看到旁边一个人的推车上放着一个鼓鼓的钱包，如果你当时又正好在为“为什么就是应该是你自己的钱”这个道理而生气，那你看到了这个鼓鼓的钱包你会怎么做？

Illustration 2:
If you bypass a wonderful house and saw a beautiful couple with their happy children, and if you were emotional with this anger "Why it has to be owned by you?", what will you do about that house, that couple and those children?如果你经过一个高档住宅，看到一对漂亮夫妻和他们的快乐孩子，如果你当时又正好在为“为什么好的就是应该你自己的”这个道理而生气，那你准备对这房子，夫妻及孩子采取什么行动？
----Jan. 2nd, 2019

Regarding rumors that one of Painter's non-heir son also had set up a Trust, I don't know it that has been next-kin-inherited by the Painter's heir-son (my next generation grandfather) and distributed already, or otherwise. I myself have not heard if that heir-son grandfather of mine also has a Trust for me, so, I have not heard anything regarding that non-heir son's rumor.
有关800年前的国画大师张国焘有一个非继承人儿子可能也有一个信托的传言。我本人不清楚是否应该已在当时被他的继承人兄弟即我的下一代的爷爷按照亲属继承法所继承，并已经由该下一代爷爷的所有孩子所拥有，还是另有说法等等。我本人也还没有听说该下一代爷爷是否也有信托给我等等，所以我目前没听说任何相关信息。

----Jan. 2nd, 2019

01-01-2019 At least it is certainly won't be the fifth year, Happy New Year to the Federal

01-01-2019 At least it is certainly won't be the fifth year, Happy New Year to the Federal 


Heard this morning's broadcasting that NJ took 300Million, and MA announced a couple of months ago that any money paid to Boston stay in MA which possibly including my this year's Christmas store gift cards (heard it right before this Christmas).

All from the third year's living expenses paying company. The reason? It is the Federal's "lousy" job granted this opportunity. If you have read my blog yesterday, you know this is certainly won't be the story for the fifth year's paying company. The validation is beautifully done, it is not the Federal's lousy validation issue if whoever read validation-certificate incompletely.

What this meaning to me? I have to be a little more patient till all sorted out. The fourth year is the Father's company which may also possibly validation-safe, which means I may be able to get the fourth and the fifth year's providing soon. Others may need to wait some more time, but no concern if the money can be declared lawfully mine or if I can still have that third year's $400Million back. (Assumed Federal's lousy validation job of a private company's payment check is the reason of this experience, not certain if it was the Federal Reserve in this morning's arguing voice to NJ: "You can't do this" and Federal's determination "nobody can touch any money till confusion cleared".)

It is not good for me because those payments to MA are mostly from the third year's paying company (10,000 per month story company), that is all currently. I heard tighten the validation itself or the validation-certification may need several more weeks, but I don't know how lengthy argument it can be between the Federal Reserve and these states.

I truly appreciate the Federal's great job on validating so beautifully done, so I say "At least it is certainly won't be the fifth year's, Happy New Year to the Federal."

I say "For the fifth year's $400Million validation, it is absolutely your problem if you do not read the entire validation-certification page word by word, from the page's most-top to the page's most-bottom."

Why I am this relaxed to the Federal's "lousy" validation job? Because I know the proud of making a rough prototype works so imperfectly wonderful.

---- Jan. 1st, 2019