03-29-2019 A challenge that I can only answer from who I am, a geek engineer and a jerk Princess

A lot of people don't realize attempting to stuck-on is an expression of desperation to be socially associated with. Is that means non-stuck-on-ers are the groups that don't care about the social association or because of never being threatened enough in their social life to be desperate?

To me, the first analytical approach would be why people associate with each other socially?

• For functional joint-affiliation biologically or marriage related families? 
• For professional promotional opportunities? 
• For life-changing adventure possibilities? 
• For the joy of accompany-ship? 
• For the alley-ship in challenging situations?

The further analysis would be on why some people turn into desperation to be a stuck-on if only felt being rejected by one or some of the above reasons? Or is that actually THE association that means all above to have such power? Or is that the only association a person can hope to be related to?

Next, my own curiosity would be a focus on if anybody can avoid such desperation if in such a situation that been set up and "ensured" to be rejected by all, such as, my current situation?

In my situation, as a lot of people have already heard, there have been so many no-association announcements for the purposes of: "don't ask if there are any intellectual incomes", "don't ask what has happened?", or "don't ask if there are any inherited money?", etc.

I heard there are more such no-association announced or about to be announced for the reason of "It is humiliating to be associated with such person...", and I heard such announcements have already started, began with five European Kingdoms, eight big names, and ten same-highschool marriages (five same junior-high schools, five same high schools).

So, for my own situation, the questions I would ask are:

• Who am I as "such person" in those announcements? 

• Why? The necessities or reasons for such announcements, for circumstances or for objectives? 

• What impacts would these announcements mean to me as a U.S. citizen?

Then, some immediate obvious would be:

Some would say it is insulting for me to consider asking,

• I say I am lucky to be a U.S. citizen who have such lawfully protected right. 

Some would say it would be a humiliating situation for me to pursue asking,

• I say it is a definite not when such public announcing is already a definite must.

Some would ask if such public announcing efforts is a hate crime activity already?

• I say I share the same question.

Some would ask who and why to need to have all these to be done as such?

• I say I share the same curiosity.

Some would concern if this asking furtherly negative my situation?

• I say I take on as a social challenge I need to answer as a geek engineer.

Some would concern how this would impact all those Emperor entitlements I inherited from Trusts?

• I say my concern is if I can roar as an Emperor instead of howling as a Princess.

----March 29th, 2019

03-28-2019 Marriage certificate represents the lawful ownership of naked human bodies, not the lawful ownership of financial wealth.

03-28-2019 Marriage certificate represents the lawful ownership of human bodies, not the lawful ownership of any financial wealth.


The ownership of a land-lot is strictly regulated by property laws, the same as a commercial company's ownership. The Trust Registration Laws forbid taking over Trust's Wealth via updating Trust registration record. I have heard the confusion about the ownership of the land-lot and if I argued as such is too much, I say, being the sole beneficiary person "female palm" to Trusts that have been set up by some of my ancient birth grandfathers, I did argue as such to respond to some harassment.
---- March 28th, 2019

The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is never lawfully owned by the husband nor by the husband's biological relative families. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说，这钱那钱很可能根本从来就不是该丈夫的钱也根本从来就不是该丈夫血缘亲属关系的家族财产。）----Originally published on March 26th, 2019

For the purpose of clarification:
How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? 

1. The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD. Both the Ford name's and the Rockefeller name's wealth started investing in North America since the year of 1700AD, which was about one hundred years later.
2. The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),   
3. The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size ($400 Million) is possibly from this company. (Rumored payments to Boston of Massachusetts are smaller amounts but can be checked similar to this)
4. The registration certificate's title sequential number and certificate's issuing government agency, this is for the purpose if need to contact the issuing agency (with the sequential number) to check out information about the owner(s) of this company and each owner's share of ownership.

----originally published on March 16th, 2019

据说那几个南京四中毕业的婚姻，和我同一届初中毕业的就是4个，估计南京那边闹得天翻地覆的，和他们这几个是说中文和南京话的有关。要真是如此，实在莫明奇妙至极。钱是谁的，是由法律所规范的，结婚证书只是男女裸体的法律所有权证明，并不是财产的法律所有权证明。所有的争执都是关于，这钱那钱的，根本就不是她们男人家里或者她们男人家族里的钱。不需要他们举着个结婚证书满大街的证明他们才是拥有丈夫裸体的法律所有权的人。
----2019年3月28日。

据说“有个育姓老师的家属嫁了同一个人”的传言是汽车厂创立人的家属强调说明目前的几代子孙亲属关系内还没有一个华人妻子的原因。
----2019年3月28日。

信托继承和遗嘱继承都是依据逝者所立的遗嘱，区别在于：遗嘱继承是逝者生前依据自己意愿将其所有死后留下的全部财产以一份遗嘱或多份遗嘱方式予以安排。信托继承是：财产所有人生前将其特别指定的一部分财产转入信托，委托第三方照看，并立下意愿书指定这份财产应该归谁所有。一个信托的第一方第二方分别是指信托设立人和信托受益人。如果信托设立人在其意愿书里只指定了一个信托受益人，这个被指定的唯一的信托受益人就被称为该信托的唯一受益人。信托设立人的意愿书在信托设立人去世后即成为该信托财产的遗嘱。
----2019年3月28日

03-27-2019 My parents have been provided by my Chinese ancient paternal grandparents' blessing handsomely(我父母的费用是一直由我父系的华人祖爷爷们的祝福所支付的）

The ownership of a land-lot is strictly regulated by property laws, the same as a commercial company's ownership. The Trust Registration Laws forbid taking over Trust's Wealth via updating Trust registration record. I have heard the confusion about the ownership of the land-lot and if I argued as such is too much, I say, being the sole beneficiary person "female palm" to Trusts that have been set up by some of my ancient birth grandfathers, I did argue as such to respond to some harassment.
---- March 28th, 2019

The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is never lawfully owned by the husband nor by the husband's biological relative families. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说，这钱那钱很可能根本从来就不是该丈夫的钱也根本从来就不是该丈夫血缘亲属关系的家族财产。）----Originally published on March 26th, 2019

For the purpose of clarification:
The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is lawfully owned by the husband. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说，这钱那钱根本就不是该丈夫的钱。）----Originally published on March 26th, 2019

How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? 

1. The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD. Both the Ford name's and the Rockefeller name's wealth started investing in North America since the year of 1700AD, which was about one hundred years later.
2. The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),   
3. The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size ($400 Million) is possibly from this company. (Rumored payments to Boston of Massachusetts are smaller amounts but can be checked similar to this)
4. The registration certificate's title sequential number and certificate's issuing government agency, this is for the purpose if need to contact the issuing agency (with the sequential number) to check out information about the owner(s) of this company and each owner's share of ownership.

----originally published on March 16th, 2019

----March 27th, 2019

据说那几个南京四中毕业的婚姻，和我同一届初中毕业的就是4个，估计南京那边闹得天翻地覆的，和他们这几个是说中文和南京话的有关。要真是如此，实在莫明奇妙至极。钱是谁的，是由法律所规范的，结婚证书只是男女裸体的法律所有权证明，并不是财产的法律所有权证明。所有的争执都是关于，这钱那钱的，根本就不是她们男人家里或者她们男人家族里的钱。不需要他们举着个结婚证书满大街的证明他们才是拥有丈夫裸体的法律所有权的人。
----2019年3月28日。

据说“有个育姓老师的家属嫁了同一个人”的传言是汽车厂创立人的家属强调说明目前的几代子孙亲属关系内还没有一个华人妻子的原因。
----2019年3月28日。

信托继承和遗嘱继承都是依据逝者所立的遗嘱，区别在于：遗嘱继承是逝者生前依据自己意愿将其所有死后留下的全部财产以一份遗嘱或多份遗嘱方式予以安排。信托继承是：财产所有人生前将其特别指定的一部分财产转入信托，委托第三方照看，并立下意愿书指定这份财产应该归谁所有。一个信托的第一方第二方分别是指信托设立人和信托受益人。如果信托设立人在其意愿书里只指定了一个信托受益人，这个被指定的唯一的信托受益人就被称为该信托的唯一受益人。信托设立人的意愿书在信托设立人去世后即成为该信托财产的遗嘱。
----2019年3月28日

My parents have been provided by my Chinese ancient paternal grandparents' blessing handsomely(我父母的费用是一直由我父系的华人祖爷爷们的祝福所支付的）

Heard about five related names married to five "the same high school".
I heard all from the same junior high school: Nanjing Fourth Middle School (都是南京第四中学的初高中毕业）. I heard these five names' marriages are the sworn protection to prevent me to sneak into "children's life", so, I have to declare I (Min Fang) refuse to gift blessing such marriage(s), permanently for the past, permanently for the present, and permanently for the future.

I heard these five marriages are also the reasons for a lot of negativeness about my parents' wish to be with me in the United States, so I (Min Fang) have to declare that my own biological lawful Chinese parents have been provided, $400Million a year each on healthcare, by my own biological lawful Chinese ancient paternal grandparents' blessing.

Since 2004, the above response has been the style for all similar financial concern related arguments, one more example:
Argument: The apartments were donated by the name,
Response: But the land-lot is owned by Chinese ancient grandpa's blessing.

For the purpose of clarification:
The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is lawfully owned by the husband. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说，这钱那钱根本就不是该丈夫的钱。）----Originally published on March 26th, 2019

How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? 

1. The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD. Both the Ford name's and the Rockefeller name's wealth started investing in North America since the year of 1700AD, which was about one hundred years later.
2. The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),   
3. The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size ($400 Million) is possibly from this company. (Rumored payments to Boston of Massachusetts are smaller amounts but can be checked similar to this)
4. The registration certificate's title sequential number and certificate's issuing government agency, this is for the purpose if need to contact the issuing agency (with the sequential number) to check out information about the owner(s) of this company and each owner's share of ownership.

----originally published on March 16th, 2019

----March 27th, 2019

03-26-2019 What exactly is the anger from Chinese communities? 华裔社区究竟在吵什么呀？

03-26-2019 What exactly is the anger from Chinese communities? 华裔社区究竟在吵什么呀？


Heard some confusion in Chinese communities about the famous American company's ownership, I heard the confusion is from a marriage certificate owner.

I have to ask the question, is there anyone disagree that a marriage certificate represents the lawful ownership of a female' bare breasts or a male's joy of hiding in the depths of such bare breasts? Can I say if disputed is about some money's lawful ownership, should the confusion be related to a money ownership certificate?

The money ownership confusion is not about if a wife deserves to be provided for by the husband's money, but if that money is lawfully owned by the husband. （这些钱财所有权的争执并不是在争执谁才是合法妻子以及做妻子的是否理应由丈夫支付生活费用，而是在说，这钱那钱根本就不是丈夫的钱。）

How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? 

1. The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD. Both the Ford name's and the Rockefeller name's wealth started investing in North America since the year of 1700AD, which was about one hundred years later.
2. The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),   
3. The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size ($400 Million) is possibly from this company. (Rumored payments to Boston of Massachusetts are smaller amounts but can be checked similar to this)
4. The registration certificate's title sequential number and certificate's issuing government agency, this is for the purpose if need to contact the issuing agency (with the sequential number) to check out information about the owner(s) of this company and each owner's share of ownership.

----originally published on March 16th, 2019

----March 26th, 2019

提到我究竟有没有钱，就不能不提华裔社区普遍奇怪为何我敢宣布我有钱就到处查询钱在哪里，华裔社区也普遍很奇怪为何法治国家的美国会允许我如此嚣张？我的回答：其实原因很简单，我继承财产的经历是真实的，我争执公司的所有权确实是有原因，争执另一方也是事出有因。所以，当时争执双方都是必须面对争执处理困扰，不管华裔社区如何对此难以置信如何表达对我方敏难以理解的愤怒，美国执法机构也一直都是在撇清究竟什么原因造成了困扰。

据说波城及其他地区的一些华裔对我不用做工挣生活费很反感，我本人对此也是投诉这根本是在进行仇恨犯罪。我本人难以理解的就是，既然美国各级政府相关机关机构都有其相应的专业工作人员在处理和我方敏有关的事宜的情况下，为何一些华人需要个别介入私人处理，并因此对我方敏在波城的生活制造困扰？
----2019年3月26日。

有些华裔社区的困扰是关于我对丁姓私人助理家人的态度为何与对美国欧家人的态度如此不同？我的回答：原因其实也很简单的。丁姓私人助理家人对我而言，丁姓一家就是扣留了我每月一万美金生活费用达二十九年的一家人，丁姓一家就是强奸了我奶奶却要我爷爷支付我奶奶子宫费的那个人的家人，丁姓一家就是以我父亲的弟弟所假冒的我爷爷签名而企图掠夺我父亲及我方敏财产的一家人。丁姓一家至今都还在到处宣传他们有一张我爷爷签名信，说是只要我父亲有钱就必须归他们所有，其实那是一张伪造签名的信件，我父亲也在1965年当时就已经向上海市的公安机关派出所报案了，而我方敏所继承的信托也都是我方敏自己拥有的合法财产。以上就是我所听说的丁姓私人助理相关的事件真相。有人很奇怪我为何如此冷静？我的回答是生活费是由那家汇款的美国公司在处理，我的法律权益已经由美国公司的律师在保护着，当年的生活困窘，我也是因我父母为我全心的付出而受惠，所以我本人对整个事件比较冷静。

至于美国的欧家人，我所知道的，欧家两代是在美国公司做法律总顾问的，从政后也一直支持美国公司的发展，在铁路建设发展后，还经常以参赞身份到访参访公司并过问指导公司的投资建设，对于美国公司的发展也都是实质上的贡献。虽然我和美国欧家一家就美国公司发生过争执，我一直尊敬也理应珍惜欧家对于美国公司发展所做的贡献，特别是在我的法律权益是被欧家所尊重的情况下，我对欧家因为一直参与公司经营决策所产生的困扰更是理应理解。

----2019年3月26日。

03-25-2019 If "prevention strategy" can prevent Mr. Peru Lu's money-desperation effectively? 以及·“1541年，一艘船的故事”

Heard some talks about "If it is this person's money...", it is rumored a Mr. Peru Lu from the U.S. Justice Departement can grant such money.

I don't know if this is a true rumor and I don't know who is this Mr. Peru Lu other than he has been featured in some negative similar rumors. For the same reason as rumored famously effective "prevention strategy" from this Mr. Peru Lu, which means in case this Mr. Peru Lu would abuse my lawful income's lawful ownership and my lawful money's lawful spending-ship, I make this following announcement: I, Min Fang, refuse this Mr. Peru Lu's any attempt to grant any of my money.

In case anyone has not heard, this famously effective "prevention strategy" has been on the public media propaganda since 2014 or so, which has been to shit me all over and to trash my all over for over 4-5 years which was after I called law enforcement's help, in order to prevent me from attempting to stuck-on any rich or not-rich males, nor to be a career successful female professional. It is rumored all advised and forcefully pushed through by this Mr. Lu's associated. Now, after this 4-5 years shits-throwing, this Mr, Lu's associated must have felt so victory of "already can take-over the money to grant"? Is this any agasp "really"? possibly shocking "really"? My reaction to this is "I have been so, and so, and SO disgusted by this pig-born type money-desperation, so, I refuse any such attempt." Well, as long as this is for the realistic prevention purpose, it should be nothing wrong for me to make this paragraph and this article as it is. I have complained to the U.S. laws about possible sexual harassment and hate crime that conducted via the public media.

This prevention purpose is for the reason that it is rumored this "grant-money" started from a joke on July 1st of 2004 when everyone "doubts" whose money I was spending, I was asked how to split my wealth between my possible biological birth children. I was asked if I would be willing to give some money to the biological birth child(ren) from rumored possibly "willing Ford-father" and "willing Petraeus-father, I said of course if they ask. The "willing Ford-father" asked immediately, and the "willing Petraeus-father" said he would ask if he needs to. So, according to rumors, this "willing Petraeus-father" had answered someone a favor to link-pass this request has been the reason that I have been constantly requested for money, which I have refused all. Why shouldn't I? Of course, I should refuse. I have refused all, and I will refuse all in the future.

----March 25th, 2019

Following is the version of rumored ”1541's or 1547's ship or shipment“ story that I heard of. （据说下面故事不是上海于姓的而是上海育姓的。据说他们要求目前我所宣布的由五家美国公司指示支付的一年4亿我的生活费用给付，其中三年的给付必须因为这艘船的故事而归这个于（育）家所有。简直某明奇妙。上篇中的Mr. Peru Lu是相关的一个于（育）小姐的丈夫。）

---March 25th, 2019

有关上海丁姓私人助理的于家亲爹于家亲戚们。据说，是因为“1541年的一艘船故事”而认定那笔从1967年开始的每月汇款中国一万美金应该是他们家的钱，每月汇款的那家美国公司也应该归他们家所有。于家这种说法根本是无稽之谈，1541年的那船和于家一点关系都没有。

“1541年，一艘船的故事” （”1541's ship or shipment“）
我听说的，1541年的时候，有一家欧洲国家的公司雇佣了一家欧洲国家的船运公司将其从中国购入的一批货运回欧洲销售。其中的一个中国供货商和上海的这个于家关系不太好，于家不乐意看着那家中国供货商因为这笔生意大发利市，所以，就把船给扣了，一口咬定那船是他们于家的。当时争执的结果是于家给抓了，一家子给关在牢里了。现如今，经过了四百八十年，是480年呐，于家的后人坚持认为他们家当年（1541年）是冤枉的，他们家（1541年）当时是坐拥六十多万两银子的家当，那船真有可能是他们于家的。

我听说的，因为买货的这家欧洲公司是我所继承的信托一直有投资的一家公司，所以，于家认为那几家美国公司所支付给我的生活费用给付的钱统统都应该是他们于家的，把我给气的是上蹦下跳的。他们于家认为1541年当时那船是他们于家的，我所继承的信托所投资的是那家买货的欧洲公司，怎么也被他们于家划进他们于家去了？还捎带上其他根本就没买货的公司？

据说，我这愤怒一吼，上海那边的于家听到又气上了，说我根本是岂有此理呀，那船和货根本是一家的，说那是八国联军在入侵的时候，那船根本是只鸦片船，当时没给扣押成功，实在就是对不起那些深受鸦片之害的中国老百姓。我一听，这指控还了得，赶紧上网一查，中国的第一次鸦片冲突是在1800年，不是1541年，1541年的时候也还没有八国联军。这些于家后人估计也是历史没学好，和我一样，历史事件居然能如此上下求索的滑了两百多年，吓了我一大跳。

我又赶紧问啊，当时这船和货究竟怎么回事啊？据说，于家是一腔的愤怒说于家当时有着六十万两银子的身价，凭什么那不是他们于家的船；欧洲那家船运公司是不停的嘶嘶说那一船货的单程运费都已经一百万两银子了，妈妈的，那船本身至少是五千万两银子的身价（据说船价至少是每年运费的五十倍左右）。当时就因为这个价钱的差别，船员和于家的伙计打成了一团，中国当时的官府是直接就将于家上下抓入大牢。现在，这于家又“吵回来啦？”

听说，1541年的时候，一张单人单程船票去欧洲是一万两银子，历时需一年，那船是货船，货运规模是可装一千石粮食的重量，一石的运费是一千两银子到欧洲，所以，那艘船的一趟运费是1000 石*1000 两银子每石= 一百万两银子。

所以，1541年的那船和那货真的都不是上海于家的，那家美国公司支付给我的的生活费用给付是我的。

----2019年3月23日撰写，3月24日更新。

03-24-2019 南京方面的矛盾（22）---- 被开除军籍的处罚？我父亲方文海的中国陆军勘探兵坚强

听说了一些针对我这篇博文的疑问，如果我父亲方文海很坚强，为何不能长期坚守？
我的回答：是你自己在怀疑我父亲方文海是否坚强吗？那你自己可以在那个地处沙漠无人区，一年有超过半年是深埋在地下的狭小环境里独自一人坚守三年吗？如果你自己已经知道了你自己不可能，你也就已经知道了你自己不可能和我父亲比坚强，你就应该已经知道了我父亲方文海的坚强是真实，是事实。那种艰苦的工作环境不光是我爸爸一个人所需要面对的，而是所有的勘探兵都有可能面对的工作环境，我父亲他们几个能够坚守三年的，都是勘探兵，所以是勘探兵的坚强。（---- 2019年3月24日）


03-24-2019 南京方面的矛盾（22）---- 被开除军籍的处罚？我父亲方文海的中国陆军勘探兵坚强

我方敏和我父亲方文海，似乎很明显是被华裔社区及中华人民共和国所摒弃的。很多华人甚至表态，如果我方敏和我的父亲方文海确实是唐太宗李世民的继承人，哪里会这么惨？就算是我方敏有居额的信托财产且与个别人有一些私人矛盾， 就算我方敏在美国的傲人成就是否真实被普遍怀疑着，但我父亲方文海在有着十三亿人民的中华人民共和国的处境为何会如此凄凉？

我不知确切答案，我也在探寻答案。普通的国人确实难以核实我和我父亲是否是一千四百年前的唐太宗李世民的继承人，但为何我父亲方文海作为一介普通中华人民共和国公民的基本法律权益都没有了？为何十三亿国人对我八十多岁的老父亲方文海所表达的或愤怒或冷漠，似乎都是在表达我父亲方文海就是应该人人见而诛杀的？我父亲方文海作为一个从不热衷社交生活且已退休多年的的南京紫金山天文台的一个天文学家，为何应该被十三亿人民理解成是中华人民共和国的一个敌人？

我听说这和我父亲以前的从军经历有关。我父亲十八岁就入伍当兵，是中国人民解放军陆军的一个勘探兵。从军五年，却是终身不得享受退伍军人待遇，军龄不算做工龄，就是因为当年的一个“开除军籍”的处分。广播剧曾经对此有过报道，但我听说有很多非勘探兵的现役和退伍军人都没听懂，不知道那是部队对于我父亲他们几个人最合适的安排和最安全的保护。很多有过从军经历的人都认为那是很严重的处分，我听说有很多人甚至认为中国方面对我父亲的态度其实是在执行军事法庭当年的处罚。

以下是我方敏作为我父亲方文海的女儿依据对我父亲方文海的了解和理解所做的解释博文。

我父亲方文海的中国陆军勘探兵坚强

前言：
我听说的是，那个观测站一年有七个月是深埋在厚沙下面，只有通气口，没有任何日光也没有电，观测站除了观测设施，没有任何其他物品也没有多余空间，只能容纳一人。广播剧所报道的几个人当时都是已经连续三年单人驻扎如此恶劣环境，全部都已经有了心理已经难以承受如此环境的临床心理症状。

我也听说了是当年那个长官的家属在过去几年里到处放话说我父亲他们几个当年造成影响实在是恶劣以制造公众对我父亲的敌意，轻视和仇恨。我也听说了，当年的事情后续经过是，那个长官只在那个恶劣岗位服役一年，就因自杀未遂原因，以这种根本就是逃避兵役方式离开的部队并保留了所有退伍军人待遇，而因为那个长官不负责任的行为所造成的恶劣后果是，我父亲他们几个作为那个长官的下属，个个都是在艰苦环境服役经年，离开时都是因公造成的心伤累累却终身没有任何退伍军人福利。

----2019年3月21日撰写，3月23日更新。

还有一件影响我父亲从军记录的传言是我父亲当年的“擦枪走火”事故，这次事故是记录在我父亲的档案里的，但其实不是我父亲的经历也不是记录在我父亲从军的当年部队原始档案资料。当年军内著名的“千元赔偿的擦枪走火”事故是发生在1950年，我父亲方文海当时已经是在陆军武汉测绘学校读书了，属于技术兵种也不再是新兵了。如果现役军人和退伍军人对此有疑问，可查询部队领导。（2020年9月8日）

----2019年3月21日撰写，3月23日更新。


我父亲当年被开除军籍的处分 (摘自：11-12-2018 和我父亲有关的 ---- 我父亲当年被开除军籍的处分 )

我父亲在中国军队服役五年，包括在沙漠无人区观测站一个人驻扎整整三年，却是被开除军籍离开中国人民解放军的。我父亲究竟做了什么违反军纪的事情，会导致如此严重处分？我听说当时是因为我父亲违抗军令拒绝再在同一个沙漠观测站再待三年。

那个观测站就位于著名的科学家彭家木1980年6月失踪的沙漠地区，本应是一个任命为期一年的无人区观测站。我父亲是第一个奉令驻扎三年的军人，他被同一个长官命令再在同一个观察站驻扎三年是我父亲拒绝执行该军令的原因。当年的军事法庭裁决是我父亲因不执行军令被开除军籍，他的长官自己进该沙漠无人区观察站驻扎三年。

我听说我父亲的整个上级领导单位里，只有这个顶头上司从未有过奉令驻守沙漠观察站或者类似的沙漠无人区工作经验，是整个事件及处理意见的原因。

那个观测站位于沙漠无人区内，没人可以在步行三天后还能存活。我听说我父亲的长官是在一年以后被调离该观察站。我听说自从我父亲的长官被调离后，那个观测站被调整成了小组观测站。我听说这是八年多以前我父亲从军经历首次播出时的故事，但好像是很多没当过兵的普通老百姓统统都没听懂的故事。

为什么我父亲从未抱怨军事法庭的如此裁决对我父亲是否公平？我估计，我父亲可能是认为这个裁决一下来，就没人可以让他再留在军队里，再给他类似的工作安排。我父亲当时是观测兵，属部队培训的技术兵种，至少需服役五年，但可延长至20年。服役期间如想离开部队需申请转业，转业申请如不批准就不得离开部队，直到20年的最高服役期满。

----Nov. 12th, 2018

以上摘自：11-12-2018 和我父亲有关的 ---- 我父亲当年被开除军籍的处分

----2019年3月24日。

03-22-2019 南京方面的矛盾（21）---- 我的2004年苏州建议和江苏省的2001年苏州规划

前序：

很明显，和江苏的矛盾，也就是需要撇清一下，究竟对苏州发展的贡献是什么？是谁的贡献？没什么特别的。

我是在外自己创业自己立业的，和南京同父同母的区别就是这点。也就是俗称的，什么是真的有本事。我和南京同父同母的最大矛盾就是我父母在南京的遭遇。南京那边最骄傲的本事就是不声不响就能把爸爸妈妈的东西全部抢到手，非常骄傲，估计如果他们再能把我的智慧专利想办法偷点，他们更是觉得他们自己很了不起。我是打心眼里瞧不起所有那些帮着他们如此”能干“就为帮助他们可以独自倾吞我父母毕生积蓄而特意向我隐瞒我父亲消息，完全无视我八十多岁老父亲2013年当时凄凉处境的那群南京师范大学附属中学及南京第四中学毕业的所谓“能人”。我和中国政府一些人的矛盾也是类似。

自信拥有一身的本事，是否白手就应该可以创业，就应该可以施展身手；还是必须有现成的大企业大办公室，才能证明拥有经营企业的才华，这一直是很多人的纠结。在很多优秀的企事业管理人才中，很多也会从大学毕业一开始就选择在大公司学习经营管理，而不是自己辛苦创业。其实，这就像电脑行业里选择做个网络管理员或者软件程序员一样，各有各的爱好，我认为也应该都是，”如果环境真的没有可能选择，两者应该都能做的情况“才是真的有本事。

我和美国这边的有钱人老婆的矛盾，也是类似。不过，这不是我一个人和某一个特定富家老婆的矛盾，而是富家女儿和富家媳妇普遍的矛盾。富家女儿从小的家教就是尊重企业的经营管理是一项特殊技能，富家媳妇认为她们自己能嫁入豪门就已经证明了才华出众，不可能不懂经营，作为投资人家里的媳妇，企业必须尊重她们的出众才华，企业必须被她们指手画脚。美国这边的企业，包括广播剧广播公司，被几个富家媳妇搅的是天翻地覆。我是因为自己的亲身遭遇公开痛骂中国政府根本就是娼妓婊子院。

（富家子女和富家伴侣的区别，就是富家子女都有需要证明自己能力的压力，而富家伴侣通常认为豪门婚姻就已经证明了自己的实力。----2019年3月24日）

----2019年3月22日的一篇博文，2019年3月23日改写。


我的2004年苏州建议和江苏省的2001年苏州规划


南京方面其他的矛盾，其实是和江苏的矛盾，也就是苏州能够享受中央政府的类似深圳政策，是否和我有关。

符合参与智慧专利评估资格的三个基本要素一般是1）机构单位有收到某人的智慧创意，2）机构单位认为该智慧创意会对该机构单位有贡献，3）该机构单位因为采用了该智慧创意而获益。在该智慧创意是对该机构单位的获益有贡献的情况下，智慧专利评估的初审就是界定什么是该人自己独立的贡献，什么是他人已经独立做出的贡献。---摘自 2019年3月22日一篇博文

我是在2004年6月的一个星期天去上医大同班的黄莉家里时，谈到我对苏州的欣赏的，就是我做奥运会创意的同一天。

我因为在上海待过五年，听到的都是上海人要定制衣服做点东西，就去苏州；要住，就去嘉兴。苏州做出来的东西拿出来就是满意，退休了能住在嘉兴就蛮好的。我在小说报纸杂志上看到的，也都是苏州自上海建埠以后，就一直是上海富人的精致品供货商，这也是苏州的绣娘一直很有名的一个重要原因。我对此的文绉绉的理解就是：苏州加工是能够体现上海设计的精髓的。

还有，上海人不会担心孩子在苏州接受教育是否会影响教育质量，因为自古苏州的私塾就很好；苏州的衣食住行，上海人都觉得挺合口味，苏州虽小，但样样物件都有苏州自己打出的的名号。我对此的文绉绉的理解就是：苏州有自己的文化底蕴，好东西随手可点但都在深巷里藏着，且都是小规模作坊式经营。

所以，那天我提到深圳就是因为中央政府的优惠政策，以密集人力劳动型代客加工为经济发展的驱动力发展起来的，如果中央政府也能给苏州这样的优惠政策，苏州作为上海设计的加工基地，再加上苏州自己的文化底蕴，以这两者作为苏州经济发展的驱动力，苏州一定是可以向深圳一样迅速发展起来的。

所谓的深圳政策，就是政府区划留在江苏，享受中央政府的贷款和税收优惠，也就是地方税收是交给江苏省的，而不像上海那样归省级的上海市自己留用。这样，江苏省政府一定是会支持的。我毕竟是南京长大的人，胳膊肘子弯一弯，要是完全不想到点南京，非得被江苏省的省会城市南京痛骂不可。这也算是捎带上了南京福利。

听说江苏省对我的愤怒，就是苏州发展计划是江苏省2001年就已经提出的，依托苏州的传统代客加工也是在该计划里就提出的，2006-2007年苏州发展计划被中央批准，享受深圳待遇。为何这却被说成是我的贡献？

我也问了一下，如今苏州发展已经是事实了，当年矛盾的真相究竟是什么？我就说我听到的。

我的贡献就是对于苏州传统加工工业的欣赏性理解。做个比喻，就是有个人很会做菜，这是我和江苏省的共识。江苏省认为中央应该大笔拨款，让这个人的做菜才华可以有施展的空间；我方敏认为这人可以自己凭借自己烧菜的才华，自己挣个钵满盆满丰厚的未来，只要能够享受贷款优惠税收优惠，方便企业经营的资金需求，这人就可以大展鹏图。

据说中央政府当年听到的建议是：江苏省的2001年苏州发展计划：没有经济发展的驱动力，只有苏州的城市发展规划和大笔资金的需求；我的2004年苏州建议：不要钱，有经济发展的驱动力，就只要求少交点税钱就可以了。

我还不清楚的是，中国政府是否有收到我对苏州发展的建议。同一天的奥运创意，我是已经通过2008年的北京奥运会很确定中国政府有收到我的奥运创意，90%以上是我那天的创意。

---- 2019年3月22日。

03-16-2019 Prenup was never a desired but a comprised fundamental for all discussion participants on July 1st of 2004

Abstract: 
I have already asked law enforcement's help to free me from possible sexual harassments from any party that has intended to maim my biological nature appearance, to compromise my health, to take over my wealth, to replace me from my possible marriage, or to destroy my way of living my life.

If all those financial confusions are about if someone's lawfully-owned money, this someone should have no need to commit any crime in order to get this lawful money when laws-help are already available all around,

If the intention is to get not-lawfully-owned money, this someone is also not privileged at all to commit any crime without being prosecuted as well.

How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? 

1. The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD. Both the Ford name's and the Rockefeller name's wealth started investing in North America since the year of 1700AD, which was about one hundred years later.
2. The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),   
3. The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size is possibly from the same company. 
4. The registration certificate's title sequential number and certificate's issuing government agency, this is for the purpose if need to contact the issuing agency (with the sequential number) to check out information about the owner(s) of this company and each owner's share of ownership.

----March 16th, 2019


The prenup was never a desired but a comprised fundamental for all discussion participants on July 1st of 2004

Heard some confusion about prenup based marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004.

My-side financial status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I: Why I say those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth?
Those payments-instructor American companies have been operating on North America soil for over 400 years, which means these companies have been investing on North America soil since the year of 1600, which was at about the same time when the most famous British East India company (1600) was first established or the famous boat of "May Flower"(1620) time, this was over 200 years before the famous America Staking (Land Run) time (1800-1850). I heard the land price at the Land Rush(1800-1850) time was about a Guinea per acre, never free but affordable was the reason for the era to be referred as Land-Run time, but land-payments paid to the Federal government had caused huge tension between local Indians and the U.S. federal government.

I heard Rockefellers started to invest in North America at Gold Rush time (1800-1850), Ford wealth started from 1900's Ford Motor. (Heard it was corrected that both names started investing (buying land) in North American after the year of 1700. That is still at least a huge one-hundred years’ time difference. ----March 18th, 2019)

So, I say those payments-instructor American companies have never been owned by any Rockefeller nor by any Ford, and those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth.
 ----March 15th, 2019

II: A company's lawful ownership = Commercial Company's Registration Laws
If any of your friends have a concern that those companies I have claimed may have been owned by your friend's family-name, and the anxiety is somehow the company insist on to provide me money as I requested, I personally think the best way for a friend to do is to verify the company's lawful ownership according to the commercial company's registration law, which is similar to the motor vehicle's registration title or the property certificate, then ...

In my personal opinion, if the company is lawfully owned by your friend's family name, the matter can certainly be resolved according to laws, even if the confusion only has impacted your friend's family name, not to mention the anxiety of watching me receiving money from the company by just announcing "I have this money" on the internet. (updated on March 16th, 2019)
----March 3rd, 2019

III: How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? (March 16, 2019)
According to laws, the commercial registration certificate(license) needs to be displayed at the operating facility of the company so that its legal ownership may not be printed on the certificate:

1. The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD。 Bi
2. The asset size of the company at the time the company was established.
3. The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),   
4. The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size is possibly from the same company. 
5. The registration certificate's title sequential number and certificate's issuing government agency, this is for the purpose if need to contact the issuing agency (with the sequential number) to check out information about the owner(s) of this company and each owner's share of ownership.

If a company registration certificate can pass all above screening check, then, check the registration certificate's title sequential number on that registration certificate which is helpful to identify the ownership information from the registration-certificate issuer government agency. (----March 16th, 2019)

Reference about commercial company's registration:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_license

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_ownership_within_England_and_Wales

https://www.mygov.scot/business/starting-business/

----March 3rd, 2019

My-side personal status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I was 37 years old in 2004 who newly inherited some handsome Trusts-wealth that a family with an heir, some children, and a marriage partner(s) naturally became such a concentration in my life, but I was in a biologically exhausted health situation that sexually involved romance was not appealing at all. So, I participated in that discussion for the reason to have children in a (polygamist or not) marriage with one (or more) marriage partner(s) who did not have any biological offspring yet in 2004. To me being a polygamist, a man who already a biological child means a leftover male who is old and undesirable in considering seriously involved romance.

The reason for the comprised prenup became fundamental for that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion
Not willing to let any part of the own-wealth to be in risk of the possible taken-over was from all participants of that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion.

What I think what might have happened after that marriage discussion?
I don't have a clue about what might have happened after July 1st of 2004, but I am positive, which means not assertive, that I may have biological and legitimate children from definitely a factually virgin-father man that, in 2004, I was willing to be involved in marriage. The not-assertive is about if I do have a biological child or children but I don't think that is any public interest but my own private matter.

Do I positively look forward to reuniting with my biological children and the marriage partner?
That depends on if that is a marriage partner who only shares biological children with me and still in the marriage with his heart. To me, marriage means a willingness-based responsibility, relationship, and exclusive inside-marriage sex (when I am healthy enough).

How long it takes for me to be healthy from my current health situation?
I have already asked law enforcement's help to free me from possible sexual harassments of any party that intended to maim my biological nature appearance, to compromise my health, to take over my wealth, to replace me from my possible marriage, or to destroy my way of living my life.

----March 16th, 2019

My understanding of all those financial confusions:
If confusions are about if someone's lawfully-owned money, this someone should have no need to commit any crime in order to get this lawful money when laws-help are already available all around,

If the intention is to get not-lawfully-owned money, this someone is also not privileged at all to commit any crime without being prosecuted as well.
----March 17th, 2019

03-15-2019 南京方面的矛盾（19） ---- 上海南京方面的愤怒，执法界的闪烁言辞，我的解释和一些道听途说

Why I say those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth?

Those payments-instructor American companies have been operating on North America soil for over 400 years, which means these companies have been investing since 1600 which was at about the same time when the most famous British East India company was first established or the famous boat of "May Flower" time, this was over 200 years before the famous America Staking (Land Run) time. I heard the land price at the Land Rush time was about a Guinea per acre, never free but affordable was the reason for the era to be referred as Land-Run time, but land-payments paid to the Federal government had caused huge tension between local Indians and the U.S. federal government.

I heard Rockefellers started to invest in North America at Gold Rush time (1800-1850), Ford wealth started from 1900's Ford Motor.

So, I say those payments-instructor American companies have never been owned by any Rockefeller nor by any Ford, and those payments I have been expecting are never from any Rockefeller wealth nor from any Ford wealth.

 ----March 15th, 2019


03-15-2019 上海南京方面的愤怒，执法界的闪烁言辞，我的解释和一些道听途说


南京师范大学附属中学校友及南京第四中学校友的愤怒：

1：凭什么说我是南京师范大学附属中学的骄傲？他们自己才是。

• 我的回答是：作为南京师范大学附属中学的骄傲应该是什么什么条件，我和他们自己之间的区别是什么？
• 在我对南师大附中的学习方法改进所作的贡献是已知真实的情况下，为什么我被作为南师大附中的骄傲就是他们这些南京师范大学附属中学校友的耻辱愤怒？

2：凭什么说这些生活费用的给付不是福特家的或者洛克菲勒家的钱？

• 我听说的，我的生活费用给付的美国给付签字公司（payment Instructing companies）都是在北美土地上营运了400多年的一些公司，也就是他们是在美国历史上著名的”跑马圈地“时期还要早一百年就已经在美国投资，是和英国著名的有武装力量的那个东印度公司成立（1600年）的同时期开始在北美开始投资的，差不多是著名的1621年的美国“五月花号”移民的时间。北美历史上的跑马圈地时期是指北美的土地价格还很便宜的时期，从来不是不用付钱就可以得到北美土地的。
• 据说洛克菲勒家是在淘金热时期（1850年）开始在北美投资的，洛克菲勒家在北美的投资历史比我的生活费用给付的美国给付签字公司在北美的投资历史要少了（晚了）至少两百五十年左右，从来不是同一个财富，只有1860年以后的合作投资关系。福特财富起家的福特汽车是在1900年的事情了。。(据说两家都公开纠正各自在北美的投资（买地）是从1700年以后就开始了，但那也是和我所宣布的公司在北美开始投资的时间差了至少一百年的时间了，不是什么很短的时间。通过公司的工商登记资料也是很容易查出公司的合法投资者拥有者。----2019年3月18日更新）
• 所以，我说由这些美国给付签字公司授权的我的生活费用给付从来不是福特家的钱，也从来不是洛克菲勒家的钱。

----2019年3月15日。


听说了一些就香港2004年汇到美国的五亿美金款项的一些争议。

1：我听说的：香港2004年汇出的五亿目前以丁姓私人助理家人名义扣留在上海，是美国的Peru Lu按照上海法院的判决并无视美国香港方面对此判决的争议而将该款项汇往上海的，Peru Lu是上海丁姓私人助理的亲生父亲的一个五等亲戚的婚姻丈夫孩子父亲。

2：我听说的：上海法院的判决法官是方智仁一女的孩子的中学同班同学。据说上海法院判决这笔款项是根据方智仁1964-1965年的一纸签名：“如果方文海”竟敢”还有钱，每一分钱都必须归丁姓私人助理或其家人所有“。据说这纸1964-1965年的签名信是由当时年仅二十四岁左右的我父亲的弟弟以我爷爷方智仁的名义签署的，而我父亲的弟弟是听我爷爷告知我父亲说给我父亲的钱存在了香港而获悉香港可能有我爷爷给我父亲的钱的。

我方敏对此的回应是：

首先，香港2004年汇出的五亿是由香港的一个信托所支付的，该付款信托从来都是我爷爷方智仁在1948年就已经直接给了我方敏（方文海所生的女掌）的钱，不是我父亲方文海的钱，我的这份回应是依据我所知道的中国人民共和国信托法及欧美国家的信托法对于信托的定义。（索引：中华人民共和国信托法， 欧美有关信托的法律知识， 也可上网查询“property law"  或者”Trusts.”）

其次，我父亲1965年已经年满三十三岁了，是中华人民共和国法律上界定的独立法律行为责任人，如果该1964-1965年的签名信是由我父亲的弟弟所写这个信息属实，那么，依据中华人民共和国的法律，我父亲方文海的弟弟是根本无权以我爷爷方智仁的名义在1964-1965年擅自掠夺我父亲方文海的财产。

----方敏（2019年3月15日）。

为何我不肯在2004当时就送出我自己愿意的这份五亿美金的礼物？

爸爸妈妈：。。。上海方面因为大娘娘的·去世，一直很愤怒，怪我为什么2004年的时候就是不肯给。很简单，当时我是身体很不好，就只有5分钟记忆力，我自己都帮不了我自己，你和妈妈我更帮不了，我自己的身体难以承受环境突变所带来的心理及环境压力，如果我给你们，你们肯定没好果子吃。如果我给他们不给你们，他们是一定会想查出个水落石出，究竟钱是不是就是确定只给我一个人的，我本人当时完全没有记忆力，根本弄不清，又不能保护你们，他们要是又有经济实力，我们三个会是很惨很惨的。所以我坚持一定要等我拿到钱的时候一起给。他们要查是他们的事，我就是不会因为好心想送礼而已就把自己弄到很惨很惨。2015年以后就不是我在拖延了，我也只能是安慰安慰他们，先注意身体，这钱是从2015-2016年就开始有传言在飞来飞去，现在的传说也还是在飞，着急了，也就是自己得高血压，我是从2015年1月就报警了。（摘自我2019年2月16日的一篇博文）

回望过去这些年，事实是：我父母的遭遇已经很吓人了，我想送礼的那几个要么没参与或者参与的很有限。

据说我父母一直很气愤我没有通知他们我继承财产这件事，否则他们对可能的危险会有点防范意识。我本人当时身体不好只有五分钟的记忆是真实，2004年6月30日当天离开律师办公室的时候我就已经完全不记得了，2004年7月1日那天也是。我相信我父母还在，我相信我自己能被保护着，那些保护我的人就会在乎尊重我托付他们照顾保护我父母的意愿。

希望上海南京方面一切安全。

----2019年3月15日

中美政府的司法执法部门为何对我继承财产说法颇多闪烁？

我听说的：据说中国的外交政策就是利用不懂什么是信托继承为借口从国外拿钱，而这些国外的钱都是外国公司在国外（即非中华人民共和国的领土上）做生意忙生产赚来的，所以对中国公安部司法部在”是否是继承之争，是否专利收入之争，还是在偷钱洗钱”事件中的角色究竟是国际刑事合作组织的一部分还是中国”拿钱来“外交政策中为偷钱抢钱探寻银行账号的协作成员部门一直争议很大。

据说美国这边矛盾也很多，美国找工作又容易，只要应聘报纸广告上的一份工作就可以成为美国的政府干部了。听说美国政府执法界的争议，除了工作中的细节处理，主要的争议有，

• 是否我的一些信托已经其实归属美国政府所有了（按照美国的信托登级法，没有任何可能。美国法律禁止通过更改信托登记在未经财产主人的授权的情况下就擅自更换财产的法律所有权），
• 这些美国公司给我的钱财是否都是合法给付即是否是事实上我继承了我爷爷们给我设立的信托及我是否确实是这些信托的唯一受益人（按照我听说的，依据美国付款公司的各级投资公司（美国付款公司上溯六百年之内的投资链）的证词及相关六个国家司法部门的相关辅助证明，我是美国付款公司的投资信托的唯一受益人；同时，按照美国的税收法，我符合缴纳投资人收入税。）

----2019年3月15日。

03-14-2019 南京方面的矛盾（18） ---- 医学上的假死状态，山东的王家，爸爸的遭遇

听到华裔社区一些愤怒。他们很气是因为，有关各方都已经证明爸爸妈妈必死无疑了，我为什么还坚持说爸爸妈妈活着。我是我父母的女儿，我在乎的是我父母好不好，所以，听到我的耳朵里，那些传言都是在说不准我父母活；很多人很气是他们有些没听明白，我也只能说如果他们没有那种王博贤，方文海都是死绝了才好的心态，再重新听听这些传言，可能就和我听到的一样了，”如果王博贤是因为医学上的假死状态被送了进去，怎么好像就是铁了心的不准王博贤有任何逃生的机会啊？究竟是谁恨王博贤恨成这样啊？她是没有钱也没有任何可能继承财产的一个？” (----摘自2019年3月13日的一篇博文)

医学上的假死状态：类似众人所熟知的昏迷。在某些心理病理原因的刺激下，人的大脑意识认知区域会出现极度休克状态，造成失去知觉的现象，这是人类的主观神经受到刺激所致，而植物神经的极度休克状态就是医学上的假死状态，也就是没有了可检测的生命指标。

----2019年3月14日。

我的犹豫：很希望尽快和爸爸妈妈团圆，但很担心在谁恨你们如此还没有查清楚的情况下，即使我已经报警，也还是担心暴露你们会威胁你们的安全。我也还是坚持认为你们必须在公众场合出现，因为我常听到的说法，策略是在各个击破及蒙在鼓里解决。钱一定要扣紧。

----2019年3月14日。

爸爸妈妈：我说我听说的，你们自己小心：

山东王家：妈妈王博贤有10个兄弟姊妹，7个是一个模子出来的漂亮，但既不像他们的爸爸，也不像他们的妈妈。据说这是山东王家认为他们这7个是杂种的原因。

我的回答：听说是因为他们像他们的爸爸的妈妈（奶奶），是典型的河南漂亮，不像他们爷爷的山东模样，不像他们妈妈的山东漂亮，也不像他们爸爸王怀迎自己的河南山东混血后的河北长相，所以做爸爸的王怀迎看着他们一直很开心，从不认为他们不是他自己的孩子。

对妈妈的恨：有一部分可能和方智仁爷爷的遗嘱有关。爷爷替我在香港设立的信托遗嘱说的是，钱是给方文海的女掌一个人的。大陆很多人在2004年以后可能听说了，但不明白女掌是什么意思，以为是妻子角色，所以妈妈很惨。

现在已经清楚了，爷爷方智仁遗嘱中所说的女掌是我方敏（爷爷的家族胎记掌纹孙女）。我在国外一直很安全，就因为国外的都很清楚，只有我活着，才会有信托每年所支付的生活费用给付。所以，国外的恶意传言都是，让我得癌，让我没有日子过。

----2019年3月14日。


爸爸的遭遇：1）我一直说我是唐太宗李世民的继承人，爸爸在激愤的时候，也因为他自己的胎记掌纹说他自己是唐太宗李世民的继承人，因为国内的很多各种传言，所以让国内的大众很气愤。2）国内不熟悉什么是信托继承，认定我是偷了爸爸的应继承财产但爸爸并不介意，所以只要爸爸不挡道了，我就没有可能拿到钱了。

我的回答：
1）：我因为是在国外生活，广播剧的国外华人非华人听众很多都是生活在法制国家里，很清楚广播剧的美国制作的法律思维逻辑，普遍很认同我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，所以我在国外一点压力都没有。（看附注，摘自：02-26-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （16）-- 南师大附中，广播剧矛盾，及唐太宗李世民的继承人）

中国国内对方文海作为我爸爸当然也是唐太宗李世民继承人的这个事实的这种愤怒态度，我方敏的回应是：我父亲方文海也是有家族胎记掌纹的，他从未因此而向中国政府要求政治上的认同，也没有要求中国政府及江苏省政府的财政特别拨款作为家庭经济来源，为何民间对于我父亲方文海是否是唐太宗李世民继承人的怀疑及不认同，会对方文海的人生财产安全造成如此威胁，实在难以理解。

2）：法律上的信托继承，是指我是继承了爷爷方智仁直接指定并在1948年就已经直接给了我的钱。所以，我没有偷爸爸的钱，也从来不是爸爸不介意别人偷了他的钱。

----2019年3月14日。

附注：

广播剧那一个星期的播出对于我的唐太宗李世民继承人的介绍：

第一，用考古学的专业知识分析推理研究而得出结论说我可能是一千三百年前的唐太宗李世明的继承人而将我和爷爷唐太宗李世民连在了一起，

第二：用法律所认可的事实依据证实了我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，

第三，用历史学的知识说明了唐高祖李渊唐太宗李世民是东汉皇帝的继承人，而说明了历史上的汉唐一家，

第四，用一个法律上的我是一个东汉皇帝信托的唯一受益人而证实了汉唐一家。

但广播剧的制作没有就考古，法律，及历史对于该说明所需要的背景知识充分展开，是造成海外华裔非华裔社区普遍认可我是唐太宗李世民血脉传承的继承人，而很多不熟悉没有基本法律概念的中国大陆人士认为我是假冒伪造根本就是被外国势力扶持在讹诈中国政府的重要原因。

如果我的说法很不准确，请纠正。

----2019年2月26日，2019年2月27日更新。

03-09-2019 南京方面的矛盾（17）---- Why I was accepted so immediately by the wealthy community in 2004's meetings? （2004年开会时那些有钱人怎么那么轻易的就接纳了我?)

I heard about some confusion regarding my current situation.

1: Exactly, what has been the issue between me and some persons I met.
My answer: The real issue has been who owns the company that paid my living expenses to Boston of Massachusetts. (--updated on March 13th)

Saying from same high school and Chinese communities, the living expenses paid to Boston of Massachusetts are paid by a husband whose most beloved wife not willing to let me receive. These some persons and Chinese communities are helping the wife to ensure I don't ever receive any such money.

Saying from the paying-instructor American company, the living expenses paid to Boston of Massachusetts are paid by the company according to its known lawful investor's instruction, and I am the person qualify to pay investor's income taxes for those payments.

Saying from myself, The paying-instructor American company is a company that my inherited Trust has been investing, I am an investor of the paying-instructor American company.

How to verify such a company's registration certificate that your friend is having? (March 16, 2019)
According to laws, the commercial registration certificate(license) needs to be displayed at the operating facility of the company so that its legal ownership may not be printed on the certificate:

1. The registration date which is to verify the company was established around the year of 1600AD, 
2. The asset size of the company at the time the company was established.
3. The issuing date which means when this certificate was renewed (suppose to be yearly),   
4. The current asset size at the time this registration was renewed to check if my announced providing size is possibly from the same company. 

If a company registration certificate can pass all above screening check, then, check the registration certificate's title sequential number on that registration certificate which is helpful to identify the ownership information from the registration-certificate issuer government agency. (----March 16th, 2019)

Reference links:

03-03-2019 A company's lawful ownership = Commercial Company's Registration Laws

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_license

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_ownership_within_England_and_Wales

https://www.mygov.scot/business/starting-business/

----March 9th, 2019

2: Some anger related to why I so comfortably calling people Uncles in 2004.
My answer: I heard the anger about 2004's meeting is regarding why I was so easily take-in by the wealthy community that I was not part of, at least, not as a newly inherited.

I am a beneficiary person of Trusts that my grandfathers set up for me, all set up abroad before China's 1949-liberation. I grew up in China but I had been taken good care of, I grew up with the rich experiences that my frustration can be smoothed even if my parents don't listen to my complaints, but I couldn't identify who are the smoothing group.

That 2004 meetings, on June 30th and July 1st, were the meetings that I felt like I was brought to a parents-alike group's affiliated-company-party that I was known to them even though I don't know anyone and they don't really know my parents, I felt its so very natural to call anyone Uncle or Untie if they are over 10 years older than me and treated me as a young girl, especially when my requests for all those "I want..." were answered with obvious smiles. Now I know most of the participants are from my grandfathers' Trusts related groups, I was introduced to them as the little girl of my grandfathers'.

My achievements in computer-research related are all real, that my in-depth understanding about the matters, in those casual chats with me about investments as the newly inherited, was the reason for those chats stayed as business work-centric discussions instead of drifting to social talks. I think this "listen to me seriously" is the reason-impression that I was fully take-in as a part of.

There are rumors if I am a threat to the United States has been the reason that I deserved to be smashed in order to protect the United States, I have been wondering why so when I am a U.S. citizen and a "self-claimed" investor to a lot of American companies who have being obviously very protective to my own money that I thought I have hard-earned the reputation of not-willing to give out any at all?

----March 9th, 2019

很多的愤怒是关于外国有钱人怎么那么容易就接纳了我，把我当自己人，是因为我喜欢叫叔叔讨好他们吗？其实，我的经历是一个典型的信托受益人的经历，我是我爷爷们替我设立的信托的受益人，信托都是在1949年解放前就已经设在国外的。我是在国内长大，但我从小就知道既使我爸爸妈妈不管，我的投诉是有人管的有人听的，就是不知这些人是谁。2004年6月30日和7月1日这两天，我的感觉是虽然我不认识任何人，但我是在一个类似和我的家长工作相关的一个公司的工作联谊场合，虽然他们也并不认识我的家长，但他们都知道我是谁家孩子，我自己觉得我把一些比我大了十岁以上又把我当小孩子看的人称呼为叔叔阿姨是很自然的，特别是他们都是笑眯眯地听我说我那一堆小女孩的“我想要这个，我想要那个"。现在我知道很多参与会议的都是我爷爷们替我设立的信托的相关人士，我是作为我爷爷们的小孙女介绍给他们的。

同时，我自己在电脑软件研究方面的成就都是真实，作为刚刚继承信托财产的受益人，我对他们礼貌问询对信托投资有何看法的相关谈话内容的充分理解和认知，是这些闲聊成为工作探讨而非社交闲谈的原因。我认为他们”很认真听我说话“是大众觉得我被富裕阶层充分接纳的界定印象。

----2019年3月9日。

爸爸妈妈：

如果方姓人士通过一些方式联络询问，就让他们自己看我的博客，自己找律师解疑释惑，亲兄弟明算账，他们既然认为他们是在捍卫他们自己的合法权益，就让他们自己找法律问讯清楚，比较合适。我没有隐瞒我爸爸还有一子，我爸爸有三个弟妹，也没隐瞒我爷爷有一弟一妹。我所知道的所有相关继承的资讯也都在那个博客上了，从未隐瞒。我是已经将我的博客在2015年就特别通知了南京，2018年也问了上海是否要我博客地址。

全世界各地，懂中文英语的，也都可以看懂我的那个博客，没什么需要特别谈的，他们是一腔愤怒，好像我偷了藏了他们的钱，我也是一腔愤怒，没兴趣看他们的老脸拖着老长，不愿意他们一副上门就是该砸该跺的气势，更不愿意自己家里被他们直接上门打砸抢。

美国政府，美国法律，中国政府，中国法律也都是可以看到我的那个博客，也都已经由我本人在2015年及2018年就特别通知了我父系母系的主要亲属关系。按照法律，没有他们的钱，就是没有。我知道的是我们家的爷爷们每代都有分家产，也就是没有任何一个爷爷欠下了他自己的下种费和亲热费，需要我这个做孙女的代为偿还，所以，也就没有什么只是因为有血缘关系就必须拿我的钱的。这就是在亲兄弟明算账，遗嘱继承是依照爷爷自己的意愿，我拿的是爷爷特别给我一个人的钱。

--------节摘自2019年3月6日文章“亲兄弟明算账”。

03-07-2019 Commercial Property Registration Laws and Political Governing-ship

I heard it has been a huge amusement in Chinese communities when there was an episode about a lady who had a big forehead family birthmark wish to let her family birthmark heir child own the Europe which was her share of the allot.

I was part of this amusement because my family (also) have a big forehead birthmark, I used possibly "also" because I don't know if that episode is about my Trust and there were some other families also have big forehead family birthmarks in that same episode.

Why it is so funny? Well, there are a lot of countries now in Europe. China has been through so many dynasty changes that even commercial ownership of a piece of land in the Republic of China time has not been acknowledged since the New Communism China since 1949, and this episode announced ownership entrusted of the land of entire Europe. I heard there was some guess if that lady is a daughter from Genghis Khan who was the only Chinese Emperor in history that had occupied Europe.

Let me try to explain a little more. Over history, tons of stories about how one group of people fought against another group of people to own a piece of land, this in China sometime brought dynasty change if the fight was big area enough, the fight was all about political governing-ship, but commercial ownership, which means owned by paying the fair property price of the land,  normally acknowledged as valid even after dynasty changed, except the communism governing since 1949. Commercial property ownership is governed by property registration laws in almost all countries.

I was such amusement in Chinese community also because I do have lawfully valid entitlements which historically means normally should associate with a piece of land each, well, I say I do have some commercial ownership of some pieces of lands. Yeah!

----March 7th, 2019

Also, there were rumors in Los Angels area's Chinese communities that a Yu-family and a Li (Lee)-family had a big fight that involved several hundred Chinese people in the 1960s, which should mean a Lee's Family Trust company in Hong Kong area should be owned by the winner of such famous fight. I also heard that Lee's Family Trust company, as well as Hong Kong people never heard of such rumor, has caused a lot of agitation from the "winner" group. I say the company's ownership in this rumor is commercial ownership of a commercial company, not the political governing-ship of the Hong Kong geographic area, so this Hong Kong company's ownership has been governed by the commercial registration laws and owned by its lawfully registered owner, not the "winner" group.

----March 7th, 2019

03-06-2019 Three cousins Mr. Lu-s and their three Miss Yu wives (三个台湾人卢先生和他们的三个于小姐妻子）

I heard there is an attorney Mr. Peru Lu, a cousin to the famous Mr. Christopher Lu, is the featured person in the new rumors who can decide how to distribute my intellectual incomes without legal authorization but his own personal thoughts.

I heard his personal thoughts include:
1: Intellectual Incomes are supposedly based upon the evaluations happened in the past, not by my demand. But if the company insist on granting me, he thinks he can grant some amount given-out as well.
My answer: Mr. Lu is not part of the rumored investigation efforts to say that I was not granted intellectual reward by fair evaluation, and what I have been demanding are the intellectual incomes from the past evaluations. I disagree Mr. Lu has the privilege to change any money's lawful ownership by his personal opinions, unless that is lawfully his own money.

2: I don't have any valid inheriting, so he thinks it is absurd for me to demand to provide payment.
My answer: I have valid inheriting experience but what I have inherited have been what I heard of, I can't receive pre-decided living expenses providing from my inherited Trusts have been the reason I contact law enforcement, and I heard all pre-decided payments have been paid out on time as scheduled. I disagree these Mr. Lu-s don't believe if I have factually lawfully valid inheriting can be any excuse for them to encourage spreading hate expression among the Chinese communities to against me being a female living alone, nor to against if I can be capable to have any intellectual contributions that have earned intellectual incomes.

Plus, I heard both Mr. Peru Lu and one of his two cousins have been married to a Shanghai native Miss Yu. And I heard, Mr. Peru Lu's wife is a sister to a wife of an investor to Boston's Chinese Supermarket chain.

----March 6th, 2019

03-03-2019 A company's lawful ownership = Commercial Company's Registration Laws

Heard there was a recent interview that mentioned if I wrongly claimed someone else's money even though the name has not been spelled on my web blog.

My answer to that confusion is NO. I have not wrongfully claimed any money.

The money I have claimed are all investments from some ancient Trusts that each investment has been a part of an investment chain for, at least, accumulated over 600 years of operating history and has been operating in over 6+1 countries for over 400 years. The claims may not be accurate but all are definitely not wrongful claims.

If any of your friends have a concern that those companies I have claimed may have been owned by your friend's family-name, and the anxiety is somehow the company insist on to provide me money as I requested, I personally think the best way for a friend to do is to verify the company's lawful ownership according to the commercial company's registration law, which is similar to the motor vehicle's registration title or the property certificate, then ...

In my personal opinion, if the company is lawfully owned by your friend's family name, the matter can certainly be resolved according to laws, even if the confusion only has impacted your friend's family name, not to mention the anxiety of me receiving money from the company just by announcing so on the internet.

I have been calling laws help because my living has been impacted, and I am concerned if my life will be threatened as well. I am not fighting for my freedom of speech but speaking from the best knowledge of knowing who I am and what I own.

I am currently patiently waiting for my providing as a Trusts-beneficiary person, and I am not the person aware of a lot of investment issues which means I won't be helpful to a lot of confusions, but I hope none of those confusions can be the reason that I need to call law enforcement's help for any complaint that I may file for threatening my life and/or my living.  

Reference about commercial company's registration:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_license

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_ownership_within_England_and_Wales

https://www.mygov.scot/business/starting-business/

----March 3rd, 2019

About those "so despised" same high school alumni:
My question: How they can be so despised when I never apply for any government benefits from them as their case-client, especially when I was never so impressively desperate and eager to please them while they are the almighty help-provider?

My understanding: They got to have some power not just don't care anything about my situation, but so despised by my situation plus how frustrated I have been.

02-24-2019 What possibly "I am surrounded by the same school graduated" means?（ “我的一切都被同一个学校毕业的给包围了“究竟可能是什么意思啊?

----March 3rd, 2019