Home

Three elements to recognize if it is an opportunity to succeed:

1) Can you understand the frustration expressed during the conversation to identify the possible causes of the frustration?

2) Can you identify if you can offer some help from your knowledge, experiences, and expertise?

3) Can you effectively communicate your expertise to be understood as possible helpful solutions?

----Min Fang, July 10th of 2019


Featured Articles

Wednesday, February 28, 2018

12-28-2018 Anger of "How you can claim you still own a business after you announced you would giving somebody some business?" -- 基金会就是一个可以让你要钱要东西实现梦想的地方啊。

12-28-2018 Anger of "How you can claim you still own a business after you announced you would giving somebody some business?"  -- 基金(会)就是一个可以让你要钱要东西实现梦想的地方啊。


These freak you out true anger (能够吓死你的那些真实的愤怒)

You already give me business, why you say that Fund is your business?
你已经说了要给我一些生意,为什么你还到处说你自己才是那个基金的老板?

You inherited that Fund? How much you can give me? Why don't I have a share? How dare you just don't give me money?
你继承那个基金啦,那你可以给我多少钱啊?我为什么没钱,你凭什么就是不给我钱?

That company is your investment, then you are its investor, but why you say you own that company?
那家公司是你投资的啊,那你也就是那个公司的投资人,可你为什么说你是那个公司的主家(东家)?

You said you would give me some investment share, then why you deny I own this much share, what do you mean I need to buy this much share?
你说你会给我一些投资份额,那你为什么不承认我已经拥有的这些份额?你凭什么要让我掏钱来买这些份额?


----February 28th, 2018

What I have inherited are trusts that my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was born. 
My name (Min Fang) is in my trust (Example Name: XYZ), this trust XYZ has invested a company ABC, this company ABC only has the trust XYZ as the name of its investor in its capital account (owner's account which means company ABC's owner is the trust XYZ). The company ABC further invested a company ABC-1, the company ABC-1 only has the company ABC as its investor in its capital account which means ABC-1's owner is the company ABC, etc. that there are these company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1-1, etc. 

My named account (Min Fang) is only in my trust XYZ, but my providing can be paid by the company ABC-1-1-1-1 that later deducted from the company ABC-1-1-1's profiting share, and subsequently deducted from company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1, company ABC, and then deducted from my named capital account ( Min Fang's capital account) in my trust XYZ.

Another way to get my providing is to let my trust wire that money directly to me which is seldom used by investors because of inconvenience caused by tedious procedures. Also, the Investor's tax for each providing check is paid to the country according to its signing local company's geographic location.

----February 27th, 2018


The anger is the confusion of the specific & the generic term of "Business".
My response: If you hear the angry reply of "You never give me any business, you still claiming yourself owning it" when the other one said, "Why you are so angry as if I owe you after I gave you all the  business I could give you?"
You would know this anger is the confusion of the specific & the generic term of "Business".

There was something more because of this changing attorney on July 1st of 2004. Somehow, Albert Gore got this impression that I asked his father's attorney firm to be the attorney for the job that lady had quitted should mean that I was willing to give him that Fund. I heard later the attorney fee was $100 Million a year or so, how my offering of two attorney positions could possibly mean that I was giving out a Fund that is $200 Billion size in 2004? It was clarified in front of everyone that was a participant in that chat at that moment already that I was only offering an attorney position to Albert Gore's father's law firm when Albert Gore kept asking confirmation of giving. But somehow since then, Albert Gore has this determination to take over my money as if I owe him.

----published on February 27th, 2018

You said you would give me some investment share, then why you deny I own this much share, what do you mean I need to buy this much share?
你说你会给我一些投资份额,那你为什么不承认我已经拥有的这些份额?你凭什么要让我掏钱来买这些份额?

In the meeting on July 1st of 2004, there were some talks of giving out investment share which only means reserved investment share for these "privileged" to buy because all the discussion was about how to let salary-recipient can pay for these investment shares through their 401K retirement plan.

----February 28th, 2018

In Chinese community, the anger is from the confusion of the same Chinese translation of "Fund" and "Foundation", "Fund" is "基金“, "Foundation" is ”基金会“ while "会” means a gathering place in the Chinese language.

The anger in Chinese community is the misunderstanding that a "Fund" is equal to a "Foundation" which means a place to demand to fulfill all desires or all wishes or all dreams.

----February 28th, 2018

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

02-27-2018 Why everyone so deserve to get my money as if owe -- 老爸爸,请去美领馆证实妈妈是或否已在美国并和我取得联系

02-27-2018 Why everyone so deserves to get my money as if owe? -- 老爸爸,请去美领馆证实妈妈是或否已在美国并和我取得联系


Heard about this morning's talk about the U.S. Consulates‘ help on searching my missing father.
My response: I truly and truly appreciate and in desperate need of this help.

老爸爸方文海:你要是听到了今天早上的广播的话,请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆),不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份,他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历,想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息,也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后,或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后,再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。

----February 27th, 2018

听说了我很喜欢的中国最著名的女作家张爱玲居然知道我给生出来了
我详细说:我是六十年代出生的,张爱玲是1994年在纽约去世的。我昨天听说海外有很多认识张爱玲的人都从她那儿听说过“方智仁的那个孙女居然给养出来了。”

我特别相信这是真实,因为这口气就是在说一个年轻时旧识的新闻。上海滩当时很多人都知道方家等我这个大小姐真是等了很多很多年哎,我实在是太幸福了。

----2018年2月27日。


Why there is so much hostility about my inheriting?
My response: I have asked this question for a long time and I can provide a little what I have realized.

On the day I entrusted I just inherited wealth (July 1st of 2004), I got a very friendly hello from a lady attorney that triggered the huge anger that had accumulated in me since my inheriting.

I was once contacted by this lady attorney in 1999 or early 2000 that if I need sponsorship of my green card. I did not know who she is was the reason I "rejected offer" by saying the company I was working for would sponsor me.

When I heard that hello from this lady attorney, I was remembering all the tears I shed for that "office romance" and I had this grudge of "where was she when I was crying?", so I refused to hear anything but determined to change attorney who had "neglected" me. Here, I am sincerely apologizing to that lady attorney again.

I did not know she was not the attorney representing my trust or me, and she possibly did not know why I should not blame her for my tears as well were the reasons she "decided" to quit her job. It caused a lot of controversy and confusion in the Fund later that how I could possibly have replaced her.

There was something more because of this changing attorney. Somehow, Albert Gore got this impression that I asked his father's attorney firm to be the attorney for the job that lady had quitted should mean that I was willing to give him that Fund. I heard later the attorney fee was $100 Million a year or so, how my offering of two attorney positions could possibly mean that I was giving out a Fund that is $200 Billion size in 2004? It was clarified in front of everyone that was a participant in that chat at that moment already that I was only offering an attorney position to Albert Gore's father's law firm when Albert Gore kept asking confirmation of giving. But somehow since then, Albert Gore has this determination to take over my money as if I owe him.

----February 27th, 2018

Monday, February 26, 2018

02-26-2018

02-26-2018 


02-21-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?

02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.

----February 8th, 2018

This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018

This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. My providing, by rumor, that a Miss Pejoves took is from a Ford's Holding investor Fund's British parent Fund's French grandparents Fund's Capital Account. Their agreed-upon providing is from their shared account with their British relatives as operating expenses in the British Fund which is the parent fund of this local American fund, so the American Pejoves' agreed-upon providing is booked in local American Fund's British Parent's Fund's capital account in the U.S that would be deducted as operating expense in Britain together with British Pejoves.

----February 21st, 2018


In the U.S, my providing and theirs providing both deducted from local American Fund's parent British Fund's capital account.

But in Britain, my providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund so that my providing is deducted from the British Fund's parent French Fund's Capital Account, and theirs is deducted from the local British Fund's operating expense accounts.

Conclusion: Their providing is paid by the British Fund, My providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund. Nothing to do with each other.

----February 27th, 2018

My name (Min Fang) is in my trust (Name: XYZ), this trust XYZ has invested a company ABC, this company ABC only has the trust XYZ as the name of its investor in its capital account (owner's account which means company ABC's owner is the trust XYZ). The company ABC further invested a company CDE, the company CDE only has the company ABC as its investor in its capital account which means CDE's owner is the company ABC, etc. My named account (Min Fang) is only in my trust XYZ, but my providing can be paid by the company CDE that later deducted from the company ABC's profiting share, and subsequently deducted from my trust XYZ's profiting share, and then deducted from my account ( Min Fang's account).

----February 27th, 2018


Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore. 

----February 1st, 2018

This above item certainly applicable to everyone who has so publicly/privately announced "having nothing to do with" me. I have no recommendation of a psychiatrist but 911 would be the number that you can try if you are in the situation of being the subject of those "insist-onfrom those announcers who ask you to do what they are insist-on telling you to do over any of my matter.

----February 21st, 2018


Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.

If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.

The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.

----February 14th, 2018

Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.

The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.

-----February 10th, 2018


听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影,也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应:如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。

2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样,就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的,更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体,这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例,如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。


-----2018年2月10日。

Sunday, February 25, 2018

02-25-2018 About Zhu's Family's Wealth & Heir and My Own Wealth & Fertility.

02-25-2018 About Zhu's Family's Heir and My Own Fertility.


Heard this morning's talk about Ling, Jihua's son(令计划的儿子).
My response: I heard there was a car accident as widely rumored abroad, but the victims of that car accident were all actress or actor from the entertainment industry, not from political related. This car accident has nothing to do with me.

Ling, Jihua is not the crown prince of the ancient Zhu's family from Chinese Ming dynasty. His last name was changed from Zhu when his family line is out of 5-cousin with Crown Prince.

I had some hostile conversation about this Chinese Zhu's family because I took them as a bad gang like family. I was corrected and I have no hostility at all against the crown prince of the Chinese Zhu's family.

06-13-2017 (3) 澄清有关令计划的传言

----February 25th, 2018

Heard this morning's talk about the real heir of the same Chinese Zhu's family.
My response: I heard that "that was the rumor not corrected yet" was said by Fang, Zhiqiang(方志强), the once featured possible heir of the Zhu's family.  He has the same last name with me, but no blood association.

I heard the reason China is promoting this "son's line " is that this person is willing to take over my wealth.

I heard the Zhu's Crown Prince, last named Chen, has Zhu's family wealth as his inheritable (*it is his mother's wealth currently), but the "son's line" does not have any inherited wealth. According to rumored stories I heard, the "son's line" is from the youngest child(son) when Chinese Zhu's family's inheriting rule changed to firstborn instead of the firstborn son which certainly made this "son's line" a denounced one. I heard the youngest child(son) and his mother only got coverage of living cost but not the family wealth at the time when the father passed away.

I heard a lot of rumors how the "son's line" is determined to take over my wealth. I have to declare if he relies on his ancient family to violate laws, I also have my own ancient family to protect me by laws. I heard Chinese Zhu's family has a lot of people live abroad now, they can verify all these rumors I heard of to know who is the real heir of their own ancient Chinese Zhu's family.

*I also heard rumors that they were informed of having their inherited wealth in 2006 which was not at the time when the family senior (grandparent) passed away, and their inherited wealth is not some sort of trust. And I heard they have no access to spend that informed inherited wealth. I did not hear who informed them.

----February 25th, 2018


Heard this morning's talk about Chinese "Stamped heir" participated in the same meeting on June 30th of 2004.
My response: I have no idea if he was in any of June 30th of 2004's meetings or which attorney/accountant group & wealth he was having the meeting with. My inheriting on June 30th of 2004 and my inherited wealth has nothing to do with this person's participating in any meeting on June 30th of 2004.

I was having my inheriting meeting with attorneys representing trusts that my biological grandfathers set up especially for me as the family heir birthmark-heir daughter of my biological father Fang, Wenhai(方文海) who is the family heir-birthmark heir from the family heir birthmark line.  I was informed to attend my inheriting meeting by the attorneys representing those trusts that my biological grandfathers set up for me.  *I was informed by my green card application attorney who was my representing attorney that was informed to have the inheriting meeting by a female case-attorney on inheriting meeting matter representing those attorneys representing trusts that my biological grandfathers set up for me.

I did hear he was informed by a Chinese Foreign Department diplomat. I do not know if he shares any grandfather with me biologically. By DNA test, he has only about 70% chance to share a grandfather. By DNA science, the DNA test result will be similar even if he shares a grandfather with me biologically which means it is not identifiable if he shares any grandfather with me biologically.

02-23-2018 Why I say "According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting."?

----February 25th, 2018



Heard this morning's talk about my childbirth.
My response: Other than malicious cursing to express hate, it means nothing at all.

I already inherited all the trusts that set up for me and I reject any donation of all kinds of pig-borne in human format but just a true moron in any format.

*pig-born in human format but just a true moron is the term I use to address those who born from a known-birth-womb but don't know who the mother should be since that birth-womb is a creature pig's womb, must have been.

---February 25th, 2018

This morning's talk may be sparked by a conversation in glass house cancer.
My response: It was in 2008-2009 when I still lived in Somerville, MA.

I woke up from my dream during a still-on conversation. What I remembered was there were some male asking for the confirmation if the request to have Ovariectomy(卵巢切除) could be sincere, and a female's voice continuing to give the answer "yes, because of the concern for ovarian cancer."

I do not know who that female was but the voice was from my throat area. I kept quiet about it since cancer talk did sound concerning. But I was never asked legally valid if I intend to do any ovarian surgery, and there was never such a surgery ever performed in-hospital or remotely.(从未做过在医院或者远程的卵巢(切除)手术)

And I say to anyone who is so confident to harm me remotely through technology, that this threat won't worth my concern but will be that person's own price to pay permanently on that person self as well as all of that person's own next generation via the exact same remote method.

----February 25th, 2018


02-18-2018 All About Fertility Related (都是有关生小孩的)

02-06-2018 为什么说我是的钱以及我能做的一些解释


Heard "Next Kin" inheriting law is the reason for current radio program's producing effort.
My response:

I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to (or owned by) any next kin of mine.

I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth go to (or owned by) anyone who has publicly and/or privately announced deservedness or intends to announce deservedness publicly and/or privately.


I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth go to (or owned by) anyone who has publicly and/or privately announced the willingness(desire) to own or intends to announce the willingness(desire) to own publicly and/or privately.

I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to (or owned by) anyone who has committed/participated or intend to commit/participate murder and/ or hate-crime that intended(intend) to make me a victim of.

I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to become No-Owner wealth through intentionally spread hate crime that targets me in order to make my lawful wealth a no-owner wealth.

I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to any charity without my clear instruction.

I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to be owned by any organization or any charity as well as any government.

I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my privately owned lawful wealth to become any format of public wealth through any criminal effort.

I, Min Fang, refuse to consider to let any of my privately solely owned lawful wealth to be owned by any other patron(s) and/or any organization and/or any government and/or generic(specific) public in any format.

(*The pressure of writing this to save my own life was the reason I started to send letters to FBI in January of 2015).

----published on February 1st, 2018



Friday, February 23, 2018

02-23-2018 Why I say "According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting."?

02-23-2018 Why I say "According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting."?

Why I say "According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting."?(中文附后)
My explanation:
The entrusting person(my grandfather) of the trust specified the sole qualified beneficiary person of his entrusted wealth is the entrusting person's (my grandfather) biological grandaughter who has family inheriting birthmark and born from a grandson of the family inheriting birthmark line with the identical family inheriting birthmark.

This means that according to entrusting and inheriting related laws:
1: If you are not a female, you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
2: Further, if you have no factual evidence of the biological grandfather-granddaughter relationship with the entrusting person(my grandfather), you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
3: Further, if you are not the biological daughter of entrusting person's family inheriting birthmark line's grandson Fang, Wenhai(方文海), you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
4: Further, if you are not the biological daughter of Fang, Wenhai who has the identical family inheriting birthmark as Fang, Wenhai's, you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.

I am my father Fang, Wenhai's one and only biological daughter,
My father Fang, Wenhai is the grandson of the entrusting person's family inheriting birthmark line with factual evidence as part of the entrusting document in entrusting records.
I have identical family inheriting birthmark as my father Fang, Wenhai's that has been verified when I was born.

Conclusion: 

1: According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting.

2: A very simple inheriting case, indeed.

----February 23rd, 2018


Heard this morning's talk about why a rich person would need to get cash from an investment.
My response:

I was once in an emergency similar situation when I was locked out of my newly moved-in apartment. I did not even have a penny or a photo ID with me, and the neighbor I asked for help doubted if I was the resident of the apartment I asked his help to open.

I heard it is a common understanding that it would be understood as impersonating with a forged ID if a rich person goes into a small investment(a coffee shop) to borrow a $20 bill in an emergency situation.

I say I would go ask where I can find a police officer because that is an emergency I am possibly in and I am in need of some help, either help of making a phone call on my behave to ask some cash to be sent over, or to help me more on my possible situation, a police officer is the most appropriate person to help me out in this kind situation.

----February 23rd, 2018

Some said if a cousin of mine can make such a phone call to me to demand cash to be sent over if in an emergency?
My response: First of all, none of my cousins share my inherited wealth. I am the sole beneficiary person of all those trusts I inherited. Those trusts I inherited were specially set up for me by my birth grandfathers before I was born. All my birth grandfathers had passed away before I was born. Mine inheriting in 2004 was not associated with any family senior's death. My inheriting was not family wealth inheriting but trusts inheriting.

Second, I do not know who this cousin can call to make such a request, and I am certainly won't answer this kind of calls from everyone of all my cousins. In China or in America, it would be the same person or same group of persons that this cousin can call to make the same or similar request.

----February 23rd, 2018


为什么我说"根据法律,没有人够资格质询我继承财产的合法性"?
我的解释:信托基金的托付人(我爷爷)指定信托基金这笔财富的唯一受益人必须是信托基金的托付人(我爷爷)的亲生孙女,这个亲生孙女必须是信托基金托付人(我爷爷)的家族继承胎记掌纹儿孙这一支生出来的,而且必须有信托基金托付人的家族继承胎记掌纹。

这个意思就是,按照信托和继承相关的法律法规:
1:如果你不是个女的,你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。
2:进一步,如果你没有事实依据来证明你是这个信托基金的托付人的亲生孙女,你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。(我爷爷)
3:进一步,如果你不是这个信托基金的托付人(我爷爷)的家族继承胎记掌纹儿子的这支所出且有家族继承胎记掌纹的孙子方文海的亲生女儿,你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。
4:进一步,如果你不是方文海的有着和方文海一摸一样的家族胎记掌纹的亲生女儿,你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。

我是我父亲方文海唯一的亲生女儿。
我父亲方文海是信托基金托付人的家族胎记掌纹这一支的有家族胎记掌纹的孙子,这事实证据是在信托文件里作为记录存档的。
我有和我父亲方文海一摸一样的家族胎记掌纹是在我出生的时候就已经证实了的。

结论:
1:根据法律,没有人够资格质询我继承财产的合法性。
2:这其实是一个非常简单而且很单纯的信托继承。

----2018年2月23日。

Thursday, February 22, 2018

02-22-2018

02-22-2018 

Heard this morning's talk about why I should be the sole beneficiary person of my grandfathers' trusts.(中文附后)
My response: I am the person who inherited trusts that my grandfathers set up for me as a sole beneficiary person is according to each one of those entrusting grandfathers' clearly expressed will.

I am the sole owner of my own inherited wealth is according to my own will.

I can inherit all these trusts after all these years is according to laws.
I can keep all these trusts as my own wealth is according to my own wish.

According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting.
According to laws,  no one can harass me to demand to have a share of my inherited wealth.
I am not willing to be harassed regarding why I am the sole beneficiary person of those trusts I inherited.

----February 22nd, 2018


Heard this morning's talk about China.
My response: Being part of Chinese who already migrated to another country's life, I agree it is important to let 1.3 Billion people in the People's Republic of China hear our doubts, and I think it should be solely 1.3 Billion people in the People's Republic of China's privileges to make any decision regarding what eligible whom to lead the People's Republic of China and to take care of the piece of land we call our root.

----February 22nd, 2018


About the concerns and doubts if I can have the health to enjoy my inherited wealth.
The rumored dynamic infection with food consumption is not concerning. The treatment technology to remove dynamic infection's food-leaking & redirecting mechanism has been available. I have no concern of all these rumors possible impacts to my health.

----February 22nd, 2018

The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.

----February 14th, 2018


*HIV new treatment technology is similar to this.

----published on Nov. 7th, 2017

听说了今天早上所提到的为什么我是我爷爷们所设立的所有信托基金的唯一受益人。
我的回应:我继承的信托基金都是我爷爷们为我设立的,我是这些信托基金唯一的受益人是根据每一个为我设立了信托的我爷爷们自己所清楚明确表达的意愿。

我是我自己所继承财产的唯一主人是根据我自己的意愿。

我可以在这么多年后还能继承这些为我设立的信托基金是根据法律。
我可以继续将这些信托作为我自己的财产保留是根据我自己的意愿。

根据法律,没有人够资格质询我继承财产的合法性。
根据法律,没有人可以骚扰我要求瓜分我所继承的财产。
我本人不愿意被任何人骚扰质询有关为什么我是这些信托基金的唯一受益人的相关问题。

----2018年2月22日。

听说了今天早上所提到的有关中国的话题。
我的回应:做为已经移居海外并且已经融入另外一个国家生活的海外华侨中的一个,我同意让那些在中华人民共和国生活的13亿中国人民知道我们这些海外华人对中国政治的质疑是非常重要的,我同时也认为只有中华人民共和国的13亿人民才有资格决定究竟应该是什么样资历的人凭什么样的资格才可以领导中华人民共和国以及管理那一片我们称之为“我们的祖国“的土地。

----2018年2月22日。

有关我是不是有可能有一份健康来享受我所继承的财富。
有关只要吃东西就会自动被感染的传言不是那么令人担心。去除造成自动感染的食物从消化道泄露及转移机制的治疗技术一直都有。我从未担心这些传言对我健康的影响。
----2018年2月·122日。

传言中的癌症移植没那么吓人,这年头,绝大多数的癌症都是可以治疗的,很多都已经可以彻底痊愈了。传言中的癌症移植就是根据癌症形成的病理机制,模拟如何从人体健康细胞来人为形成这种那种癌症的一种诱发早期癌症形成的机制。众所周知,现代医学对于癌症的诊断就是依据对于这些病变后细胞的正确识别。至于治疗吗,我估计也就是一旦发现就尽快去除这些病变后的细胞。如今这种治疗机制已经开始用于那些自然形成的癌症的治疗了。

----发布于2018年2月14日。


*HIV new treatment technology is similar to this.

----published on Nov. 7th, 2017

Wednesday, February 21, 2018

02-21-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?

02-21-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?

02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.

----February 8th, 2018

This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018

This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. My providing, by rumor, that a Miss Pejoves took is from a Ford's Holding investor Fund's British parent Fund's French grandparents Fund's Capital Account. Their agreed-upon providing is from their shared account with their British relatives as operating expenses in the British Fund which is the parent fund of this local American fund, so the American Pejoves' agreed-upon providing is booked in local American Fund's British Parent's Fund's capital account in the U.S that would be deducted as operating expense in Britain together with British Pejoves.

----February 21st, 2018


Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore. 

----February 1st, 2018

This above item certainly applicable to everyone who has so publicly/privately announced "having nothing to do with" me. I have no recommendation of a psychiatrist but 911 would be the number that you can try if you are in the situation of being the subject of those "insist-onfrom those announcers who ask you to do what they are insist-on telling you to do over any of my matter.

----February 21st, 2018


Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.

If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.

The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.

----February 14th, 2018

Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.

The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.

-----February 10th, 2018


听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影,也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应:如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。

2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样,就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的,更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体,这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例,如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。


-----2018年2月10日。

Tuesday, February 20, 2018

02-20-2018 Well, Is it a charity or a deservedness to have a own blood

02-20-2018 Well, Is it a charity or a deservedness to have an own blood

Heard this morning's broadcasting of "why don't you get that HE is the person really supports the wife".
My response: Why don't you get the fact I am much wealthier than him. Please notice the capital "I" and the lowercase "him" according to the English grammar.

I am the wealthiest heiress ever. I do have my own great and great which is a lot of "great" prefix that is so well-deserved birth grandfathers.

----February 20th, 2018


Well, Is it a charity or a deservedness to have an own blood?
My response: I do not have any child (children) with anyone featured in this morning's radio broadcasting is a true statement.

I do have the obligation to express myself that I have nothing to do with that those him with the same level of "paying attention to the necessity of expressing publicly the fact of really having nothing to do" for my future young and handsome who possibly already paying attention to the medical treatment progress of my appearance. So, let me have a start as:

Be alert: according to the rumor, this morning's featured wives are all truly well-known to the husbands' society because they were all once very expensive and famous prostitutes in Las Vegas who get paid to open legs to all riches that can afford to pay their expensive prices.

This rumor may actually be convincing to everyone who ever doubted why they are only acknowledged as "a longtime girlfriend" for years till this recent public proud announcements as if there are some secrets need to hide, as well as all those "the price proves the goodness" logic &"mother-fxxxer" titles. This rumor may just be the secret and reason of the proud of shared or even inherited Connoisseur level of knowledge and capability.

As long as this wife is what he truly deserved, I love to spread this rumor to tell everyone who he truly deserves.

Well, the answer to the question "Is it a charity or a deservedness to have an own blood" depends on who he really is for both scenario, so, I let the reader of this blog decide what it is based on their own knowledge of who he truly is. I just don't understand why Tina O'Connor can be so willing to sacrifice herself to be a Pathetic Psycho on this blog.

02-14-2018 This morning's Proud of "Well Deserved Giving-only Promised Share Forever Romance"

----February 20th, 2018




Monday, February 19, 2018

02-19-2018 Two different Accounts & A Chinese Jennie from Ford Foundation believed Ford name is a beggar's name

02-19-2018 Two different Accounts & A Chinese Jennie from Ford Foundation believed Ford name is a beggar's name

Heard this morning's broadcasting of Beggar Ford.
My response: Heard that is a Chinese Jeannie from Ford Foundation's joke about who the Ford name truly is.
-----February 19th, 2018


02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.

----February 8th, 2018

This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018

Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.

----February 1st, 2018

Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.

If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.

The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.

----February 14th, 2018

Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game Opening Ceremony would never be presented as it was.

The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening Ceremony is what it was is because that is produced from my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.

-----February 10th, 2018


听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影,也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应:如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。

2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样,就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的,更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体,这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例,如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。


-----2018年2月10日。

Sunday, February 18, 2018

02-18-2018 All About Fertility Related (都是有关生小孩的)

02-18-2018 All About Fertility Related (都是有关生小孩的)


Heard this morning's talk about "why do you need to have your own biological child".(中文附后)
My response: I heard it was a first cousin from my father side who possibly expecting to be a "Next Kin". I already refused to let my wealth to be owned by any next kin of mine.

I repeat what I said in the morning for whoever has this understanding even if this is indeed from a cousin: "I can watch your biological child or biological children get burned to death without my eyes blinking because I do have my own biological children already. It is from the same understanding that I don't think you need to have your own biological child at all."

----February 18th, 2018

Heard this morning's confusion expressed "Who is going to father your biological child since all those old have already publicly denounced you?"
My response: I can choose the excellent handsome juicy young man from those who expect to share easy luxury life with me happily.  I got very handsome blessing from my own birth grandfathers and a fertility-specific blessing from a birth grandmother of mine. I am happy and I don't mind to share a happy luxury life with a great young man even if that means much younger man.

I can totally envision my young and handsome with all our children cheering our securities marching in my own designed uniforms from our private balcony. Well, I do have tons of Imperial titles from my own birth Imperial grandfathers that I inherited together with the financial blessing.

I am a female but I am an heiress of a long history polygamist family, it has been 2000 years long to be specific. I am not the person can be so easily freaked out to be so readily miserable by this kind of shitty talks.

----February 18th, 2018


Heard the reason that my reward from Viagra(Blue) was taken is "Fertility Goddess worship" rumors.
My response: I refuse to let my contribution to Viagra (Blue) to be taken by anyone for any reason.

I heard of this Fertility Goddess rumor today and I have to say I do not know if this is part of so many build-up a case efforts to take my intellectual income because the argument of the true deservedness of taking my share of viagra (blue) invention reward is that it should be deserved by a viagra(blue) beneficiary person who can use viagra to perform sexual intercourse.

I do my clarification here: I contributed to help females' infertile issues with pregnancy-mother is a true statement. It was inspired by my own efforts to help myself to have my own biological children through pregnancy mothers. This inspiration was promoted by so many people who truly wish infertile women can be mothers of their own biological children. And this inspiration was based on already existing matured medical technology of tube baby - IVF(In vitro fertilization).

*I heard oral intake Viagra(Blue) can result having at least several valid sperms in each outburst which can be used to produce healthy children through the same IVF technology. I contributed to Viagra(Blue) is a true statement too.

----February 18th, 2018


听说了今天早上所提到的“你还需要你自己亲生的小孩干嘛?”
我的回应:听说那是我父亲的弟弟妹妹的一个小孩讲的,估计自认是可以够资格凭近亲法律继承的。我已经拒绝让我的财产被按照所谓的近亲法律继承了。

我重复我早上说的,谁愿意这么说,我就愿意对这人那人这么回应:“我可以看着你自己的亲生孩子被火活活烧死,我可以连眼睛都不眨一下。就因为我也已经有了我自己的亲生小孩,就因为我也认为你是不需要有你自己亲生小孩子的。和你也就是彼此彼此啦。”

----2018年2月18日。


听说了今天早上的广播所传达的“那些年纪老了的都已经公开宣布不要你了,你还跟谁生孩子啊?”
我的回应:可选的人多啦。我可以从那些愿意和我共度快乐奢侈人生的年轻英俊又多汁多液的成堆小伙子当中选啊。我可是继承了我爷爷们给我的非常非常丰厚的祝福啊,我还有一个奶奶专门给了我一份多子多福的祝愿。我很快乐而且我也不介意让一个年轻英俊的好小伙和我共度美好快乐的奢侈人生,就算那是一个年轻了一大截的,只要他优秀,我也是不会在意的。

我真是很能想象我的年轻英俊和我们论堆算的孩子们一起,站在我们自家阳台上共同检阅那些穿着我自己所设计的制服一起迈着那整齐的步伐的保安们。我还真是有一堆我那些帝王将相的爷爷们所给的高贵王室帝王头衔,像Ingonyama(狮子王)这种,我继承爷爷奶奶们的祝福就是连信托的财产和这些头衔就一起都继承了。

我是个女孩,但我可是有着2000年历史的一夫多妻家庭的继承人。我可不是那么容易就被这种下三烂的狗屎说法轻易的给吓到从此苟且偷生的。

----2018年2月18日。


听说我从伟哥蓝片拿到的智慧产权奖励被拿走是因为一个"凭什么把我当送子观音"的说法。
我的回应:我拒绝我对伟哥蓝片的贡献被任何人以任何借口而领走。

我是今天才听说送子观音的说法,我还必须得说我不知道这种说法是不是属于那一堆以制造案子来掠夺我的智慧产权收入的违法活动的一部分。听说伟哥蓝片的智慧产权收入中属于我的那一部分奖励被拿走的理由就是这份奖励就是应该属于那些吃了伟哥蓝片可以进行男女性交的受益者。

我做我能做的解释:我对“不孕女性可以通过代理孕母以实现拥有自己·亲生孩子的愿望”有贡献是事实。这份想法是源自我希望我自己可以通过代理孕母有我自己的小孩。这份想法被很多真心希望不孕妇女可以拥有自己亲生骨肉的人士所大力推广,这份想法是基于当时已经存在也已经很成熟的现代医学的试管婴儿技术--人工体外受精胚胎移植受孕技术。

*我听说口服伟哥蓝片可以在每次服用后的射精时产生至少几个有效精子可以用来通过同样的人工体外受精胚胎移植受孕技术以实现不孕男子拥有自己健康亲生小孩的梦想。我对伟哥蓝片有贡献也是真实。

----2018年2月18日。

Thursday, February 15, 2018

02-15-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal named capital account everywhere?

02-15-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal named capital account everywhere?

02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.

----February 8th, 2018

This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018

Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.

----February 1st, 2018

Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.

If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.

The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.

----February 14th, 2018

Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.

The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Openning is what it was is because that is produced from my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.

-----February 10th, 2018


听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影,也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应:如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。

2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样,就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的,更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体,这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例,如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。


-----2018年2月10日。

Wednesday, February 14, 2018

02-14-2018 This morning's Proud of "Well Deserved Giving-only Promised Share Forever Romance"

02-14-2018 This morning's Proud of "Well Deserved Giving-only Promised Share Forever Romance"

Heard this morning's announcement of a Jessica's one female's polygamist family.
My response: The four announced proud sharing males have nothing to do with me is a true statement. Let whoever read this blog to decide if I am writing out of jealous.

I heard this morning's proud announcement of 4 brothers sharing a one-and-only child each from one Jessica. This Jessica, I accused, is the hater you heard on the radio that fully supported by this males group to throw all those shits towards me.

I heard the announced four males are not really brothers but cousins by blood. Their willingness to be a group to center the Jessica to have this polygamist family is indeed very impressive.

Compared to the four prominent named males, this Jessica is in her late forties who has no advantage in age, no advantage in appearance, no advantage in education, talents or achievement, no advantage in family wealth, no advantage in the family name's prominence and resources.

Very impressively is the rumor that romance is promised forever as long as this Jessica is available to anyone of the four's desire.

Very impressively is the enormous supports publicly presented by the families as well as relatives of those males.

Very impressive is the full-heart willingness that proudly emphasized publicly & privately through all these spoil this Jessica rotten expression.

So, I say
It is not some disgustingness because it is obvious that the wealthy family name's proud is that brothers sharing one woman is not out of poverty,

It is not some sacrificing because it is obvious that none of these four prominent males have done this without their own full heart willingness.

It is not some unfitness because it is obvious that there is nothing to match the males with the female Jessica at all when matchmaking concept needed to be mentioned.

Thus, I conclude
It must be the Gift of Deservedness from whatever creature these four males take as their almighty.

It must be the Fair Evaluation of who those males truly are to have this female Jessica to be what they truly deserve.

It must be the Pure Simplicity of what Jessica vs David is in British-American adult slang.


Being the victim of this polygamist family's public expression of negativeness, I confess
I am truly happy I am truly not what they deserved in romance,

I am truly not willing to be a giving-only in my romance,

I truly not deserve to be such a David to have this Jessica-Davids style of fair evaluation.

I can't afford not to mention that none of these Davids, Jessicas or equivalent has a capital account that is big enough to self-claim a significant investor or an investor at all in the radio company or any of R's investment.

Compare to most of them, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.

If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is everyone of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil..

----February 14th, 2018

Sunday, February 11, 2018

02-11-2018 Two different Accounts

02-11-2018 Two different Accounts

02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.

----February 8th, 2018

This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018

Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.

----February 1st, 2018

听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBJI所录影,也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应:如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。

2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样,就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的,更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体,这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例,如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。


-----2018年2月10日。

Saturday, February 10, 2018

02-10-2018

02-10-2018

Heard this morning's mention of two Fang's names health.
My response: In 2004, it was mentioned that my father's siblings and my grandfather's siblings would have local health insurances provided that, as a joke, should be deducted from their own money of ¥500 Million that I was willing to gift later or so. They are my father side's relatives that I heard of or am familiar of.

I would feel bad if there was no such discussion in 2004 when I made the arrangement of my own parents' healthcare. The healthcare I received is the reason I have this confidence about if my parents still alive.

----February 10th, 2018


Heard some confusion of other health care.
My response: My mother's eldest sister, 王博真, who was very nice to me when I was little, had received best available local health care provided for her in her last days. It was from her, when I was 12-14 years old, that she had her own child adopted and I was only her sister's child. I felt comfortable that she had received the health care she needed in her last days, and I am comfortable that I was not the person she needed for accompanying in her last days.

----February 10th, 2018


Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.

The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Open is what it was is because that is produced from my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.

-----February 10th, 2018


听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBJI所录影,也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应:如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。

2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样,就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的,更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体,这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例,如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。

-----2018年2月10日。

Thursday, February 8, 2018

02-08-2018 Two different Accounts

02-08-2018 Two different Accounts

Heard this morning's talk about two different accounts.
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.

----February 8th, 2018

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

02-06-2018 为什么说我是的钱以及我能做的一些解释。

02-06-2018 为什么说我是的钱以及我能做的一些解释。


我的继承是怎么回事:
我继承财产的故事其实很简单,就是因为我是家里2500年来第一个有着和爷爷们一样的家里的继承掌纹胎记的女孩子,我爷爷们用为我设立信托的方式给了我一些礼物以示庆贺总算有了我(女孩)加盟之意。这钱那钱是我的就是因为是由我爷爷们替我设立的信托投资的。


我所继承的信托里就没有方承捷的名字,我和他都还没有生出来啊。我在我爷爷的遗嘱里是个代号“女掌(有掌纹胎记的女儿)”。我能抢他什么钱?

我的祖爷爷(我爷爷A),也就是设立这个信托的那个人在他的信里(遗嘱里)界定了一个由他自己的哪个儿子(我爷爷B)所出的家族继承胎记一支的一个有着家族继承胎记的女儿是这个信托的唯一受益人。遗嘱信中所界定的那个儿子(我爷爷B)是一个有家族继承胎记的儿子。

我爷爷B,也就是我爷爷A在他自己所立遗嘱里所界定的继承人儿子,没有生出一个有继承胎记的女儿而是生了一个有继承胎记的儿子(我爷爷C)。所以,我爷爷B就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人,这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子(我爷爷C)这支所出的。

就这样一代又一代,直到我爷爷方智仁这一代。我的父亲方文海是我爷爷方智仁所出的有继承胎记的儿子。所以我爷爷方智仁就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人,这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子方文海这支所出的。

我是1967年出生,我的家族胎记掌纹和我父亲方文海的胎记掌纹几乎是一摸一样的。

这是为什么我说我是按照我祖爷爷(我爷爷A)的遗嘱继承了我祖爷爷(我爷爷A)所设立的这个信托。那个基金是由我所继承的这个信托所设立的,所以我说那是我的基金。


有关我继承财产的一些矛盾愤怒及我的解释:

"你要是有钱,为什么就不能给他或她一点。”
我回答:我有钱,只因为有个他或她想要也需要,你就替他或她跟我要钱,也就是你在替他或她讨饭就是了,否则谁不需要钱哪。街边上讨饭的哪一个不是因为觉得过路人有钱,而讨饭的确实需要才讨的呀?可你讨得也太狠了点,不是一分两分,是豪宅名车貂皮大衣,还要永远如此。我方敏就是拒绝给钱。

你要真是需要帮助,去慈善机关就得。只要你属于慈善帮助的对象,符合条件,他们会帮助你,不会给你脸色看的。我所继承的财产都有支持慈善。需要说明的是,虽然是我方敏的投资在捐款,但这些钱都是当地人挣得,所以“同样来自中国大陆”不会是优先得到慈善帮助的任何原因。


“你要是继承了财产,为什么就不能对中国做点贡献”
我回答:你指的是对中华人民共和国960万平方公里和十三亿人民做贡献吗?文化上,2008年北京奥运会残奥会开闭幕式;经济上,蔬菜大棚,城市公交地铁,等等,这可都是2004年我继承财产以后对中国的贡献。你想要的究竟是什么具体的贡献?


“你要是有钱,为什么就不能给你弟弟老婆一点钱”。
我回答:我的母亲作为我父亲的老婆被我父亲养着,吃住我父亲的,就是因为她自己没有收入就被我弟弟的老婆找了一堆的朋友来教训教训要我母亲识相点,别忘了她自己就只是个没有收入的人。我作为我母亲的女儿,我就是不乐意给这个所谓弟弟的老婆一分一厘我的钱。我就是不乐意给这个所谓的弟弟的老婆所生的任何杂种非杂种一分一厘我的钱,更不用说大把钱。我方敏就是拒绝给任何钱。


“我就是不明白,那些有钱男人已经是一次次的宣布和你一点关系都没有,你为什么还说你很有钱?”
我回答: 因为我的钱不是那些有钱男人给的,而是我自己亲生的爷爷们给的。我的钱和他们家里财产有一些投资伙伴的关系,就这关系。

他们一次次的宣布和我没关系,有些是出于他们自己的生活状态以及和我的矛盾,有些是不堪被这些来自中国的愤怒言语及被要求协助非法分我所继承的财产所骚扰。


“我就是不明白,为什么你有钱,我怎么没有?”
我回答:你很清楚你和我一点血缘关系都没有,而我的钱是我自己亲生爷爷给我的,你还问为什么你没有?

你是在强调中国是个大妓院,而你是中国大妓院成员之一吗?也就是你虽然和我没有性关系,你也可以凭你的裤裆应该有钱吗?你也是因为弄不清性交,夫妻性关系与父母子女之间因父母性交而产生的血脉传承关系的区别吗?还能有什么原因你就是不明白,我的钱和你一点关系都没有,你还就是必须要让我把话跟你说清楚还必须让你弄明白为止,还特别够资格就是愤怒?

你得先问问谁愿意做你的嫖客再问凭什么。我方敏拒绝做你的嫖客,我方敏拒绝让你幻象你可以凭你的裤裆来要我的钱。

“我就是不明白,你有钱,为什么你的亲戚却是一点都没有?”
我回答:我继承的是信托,是我的爷爷们因为我是个女继承人另外给的。我的亲戚们都已经在他们的父辈去世分家产时拿到了他们自己的那一份,这包括我父亲的兄弟姊妹也都在他们的父亲1965年去世时拿到了他们父亲给的财产。中华人民共和国的信托法和继承法可以帮助你了解很多什么是信托继承或者继承信托。

我的父亲目前是失踪,我到目前为止都没有听说我父亲继承了什么财产,而我父亲的毕生积蓄和唯一的一套房子估计已经被他唯一的儿子(我弟弟)转移到了我弟弟的名下。

我所继承的信托不是我父亲给的,是我的爷爷们,也就是我父亲的父亲及爷爷们给的。


“我就是不明白,你有钱,为什么你要吃救济?”
我回答:我不是在吃救济。因为信托财产之后经常会出现一些这样那样的意外状况,而且因为法律为保障信托人的利益而设置的一系列规范,财产信托后再更改信托财产时所决定的生活供给很难,所以在我2004年继承信托后,因为健康原因又再办理所继承财产的诚信托付时,有人建议我的生活供给通过美国政府的福利系统给付以保障我的生活不至于因为一些意外状况而真的流落街头没饭吃。我现在的生活低水平就是因为一些这样那样的状况,这些状况目前已经在法律处理当中了。


有没有可能有其他方家血脉的钱在我的信托里?
回答:真的没有。目前我在我博客上宣布的已经向我支付健康保健给付的,也就是被闹得很凶的那几个基金,都是已在美国几百年了,也就是几百年以前就已经被信托的钱了。从当年办理信托到现在已经好几百年,也换了很多律师,都没有联络他们就是因为没有他们的钱。。

有人说万一那?
我回答:没有万一。要么就是有钱但不想给才没给,要么就是没有钱。没有任何万一的。一切是按照信托法和继承法所规范的。

我有收到钱就已经说明我的律师是诚信很好的,按我爷爷的托付把钱给我了。这就已经说明我的律师没有他们的钱。

如果有方家亲戚问他们爷爷奶奶的钱在哪里。
我的回应:他们的爷爷奶奶从来就没告诉过我。

解释:我不认识他们的爷爷奶奶,我的爷爷奶奶是在1965年及之前就去世了。我是1967年才出生的,从未见过他们的爷爷奶奶或是我的爷爷奶奶。我父亲是连他自己亲爹的钱藏哪儿了都没有听说过。我哪里会知道他们的爷爷奶奶把钱给藏在哪儿啦?

至于我的信托律师会不会知道他们爷爷奶奶的潜藏在哪儿啦,我得说清楚现在应该所有人都知道我的信托律师诚信很好,要是他们这些律师知道他们爷爷奶奶的藏钱处,那一定是会通知他们继承的。

至于我要是听说什么消息,我可以通知警方,因为“不知道他们人在哪才没给钱”这种情况是不大可能的。在国外,都是受委托律师承担通知受益人继承财产的责任。


为什么说那家基金从来不是欧家的(O'Connor)。
这家美国基金公司从来不是OConnor家的钱。这个美国基金和英国东印度公司投资人基金是由同一个上级的·法国基金公司所投资的。整个英国法国都知道,听说就因为东印度公司的投资人基金(也是这家基金的投资人)是英国王室曾经最想要的基金。但这个基金是有个法国上级公司,虽然法国英国是谁也不怕谁,但这家法国公司还有个斯堪的纳维亚半岛的上级投资公司,所以整个英国和法国都知道这个基金是个亚洲人所设的信托投资的,从来就不是欧家的(从来不是O'Connor家的)。闹了有一两百年,英国王室没弄到手也就算了。现在他们也不要了。都听到英国王室宣布不会和我有任何关系没有任何小孩也不会有任何小孩,就是宣布不会再要这个基金。(基金只有被我所孕育的英国王储所拥有才可以被英国王室合法拥有)。

我是英国东印度公司的投资人就是因为英国的东印度公司是由我的信托投资的。英国东印度公司有很多投资人,这家投资基金时期最早的投资人,也是最有名的。我的主家资本账户是在我所继承的信托里,不在这家英国基金里, 这家企业账本上只有其上级法国基金投资公司作为主家有主家资本账户。况且公司也不见得人人都确定知道我是公司的投资人,所以尽管这家美国企业是我的信托所投资的,一般情况下我也不会直接跑去公司拿钱。

就象有个银行家开了10家饭店,这个银行家要是需要什么东西,最恰当的就是联络和他有直接工作关系的替他照看餐馆的经理,因为那些餐馆员工不见得人人都认识这个银行家。我也是一样。我是在我自己的手机录音机上就可以有效留言给我的信托律师,我父亲应该也可以。但我父亲最好是和我联络以免感觉被忽视了。

我要劝我父亲耐心点,我们的情况已经在好转。众所周知,如果我的情况好,我父亲就不可能是现在这份处境,而我们是现在这份处境,就已经说明我的律师们是很忙很忙了。我知道的是,至少是美国的执法机关在我寻求他们的帮助开始就是忙的不得了。

我是有适当的授权而由这家美国基金支付费用医药及生活,这家美国基金是把这份替我支付的费用从其上级法国基金投资公司的主家资本账户里的应缴盈利部分扣除,而这法国基金投资公司再把这笔钱从其斯堪的纳维亚上级投资公司的主家资本账户里的应缴盈利部分里扣除,持续如此,最终就是由我自己的信托里的我的主家资本账户里的应收账款里扣除。所以,如果这家美国基金在其法国投资公司的授权下,由美国投资基金公司的法国基金主家资本账户里替我支付费用,这份费用付款是合法支付而且只能被我使用,因为这些钱最终是由我替我自己支付的。所有这些费用支付都不应该被误认为是什么捐款。

----2018年2月6日。

Sunday, February 4, 2018

02-04-2018 My father still alive but not on public welfare (我父亲还在但不由民政局援助)

老爸爸方文海,你其实是被我给信托了, 我所信托的财产很安全,你也很安全,请尽快和我联系,或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227,或者和美国上海领事馆联系要求美国公民的紧急联络服务(021-8011-2400, 属美国公民服务),我已经和他们都联系过了,美国上海领事馆也已经打电话和我取得联系,他们有我的有效联系方式。(联络信息在01-19-2018的文章里)。你如果智能手机以及可以使用无线上网的电脑(一体机电脑,手提电脑,平板电脑等),可以使用手机上的《移动热点》功能通过电脑的《无线上网》功能上网。紫金山天文台的联络信息: http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/

妈妈王博贤,听说了你有收到我的信托提供给你的健康照顾,我相信你很好,我会想办法如何可以和你取得联系。爸爸目前和我也失联。你要是能看到这个博客,就去图书馆办个图书馆卡用somebodyinma@gmail.com 和我联系。用手机上的《Email(电邮)》功能就可以。
(*我目前不是太清楚我母亲是否也有故事,她是2007年“去世”。一切就为我的一些爷爷们在我出生前就替我办的信托,。只有我有,我父亲没有。据说抢夺这份天上掉下来的财产以及我丰厚的智慧产权收入,闹得确实很吓人。我也不太清楚。)



02-04-2018 My father still alive but not on public welfare (我父亲还在但不由民政局援助)

Heard my father is alive.
My response: I heard through this morning's messy arguments that my father is alive but he is not his own pension or provided through Chinese government's welfare as I am provided through U.S. government welfare system.

It was decided on July 1st of 2004 that my mother would have some financial help because she lost her pension. I do not remember what is the financial arrangement decided about my father because he should have his pension from Chinese Academy of Science Nanjing Purple Mountain Observatory. It was not about to save some expenses, I knew for certain from my own experience of living in China after 1980 time, they won't have a chance to enjoy what I provided for them without me ensuring that. It did shock me how he could be threatened to "lose" his own pension. He may be on the emergency arrangement of my providing.

A lot of people have puzzled how that rumor could be possible, it is actually the typical 1980 is about. This "how could it possible" is possibly the same reason that my father got up from the ground on his own and left home without taking his Bankcard where his pension should be deposited. He was announced dead after he ousted from his own home this way.

The rumor I heard is he was pushed out of a moving vehicle after he was pretty much dragged in. And when he was threatened that Do not call the police, Do not try to the get pension, and if he dares to demand the pension, he won't have a next meal to eat. By rumor, my father was pushed out by the current Chinese Premier Li, and all these threats were told by a female with the current Chinese Premiere's Li's presence. I heard this rumor can be verified from Satellite records.

The typical 1980 means there was no pre-arrangement to ensure my father could get up from his fall, there was no pre-arrangement to let my father have some food or lodging. And it means that after all these were said, my father has nothing to do with those who pushed him out of the moving vehicle and threatened him unless my father called police or demanding his pension. My father is not the person know this language smartness. He just got up and left home without his pension. When I finally have some cash to call his home phone in January of 2015, I was told my father was announced dead on October 4th, 2013. I survived similar "how could it possible" situation in 2014 and I started to call police ever since I was told I am supposed to live in poverty and die in this apartment I am currently residing.

Another typical 1980 is, for example, if you do not have a bank card or a bank statement, the bank employee who opened your banking account can tell you know nothing about if you have any saving in this bank. If you go to the Clear Channel radio company now, this "no such money in our keeping " may be the standard answer you will hear if you ask where is my major featured person fee. I did not receive a penny and I did not have any reference to say there is such a radio program ever produced by Clear Channel (IHeartRadio), even though it was such a worldwide popular radio program. In 2016 time, I was still on Boston 96.9FM when there was rumored that radio company would pay this $3Billion major featured person fee. And the Jessica group took it with nothing wrong attitude and till today, it is not in my possession. No lawsuit about it because I can't even afford attorney fees. I called police on this as well.

I am searching for my father because I saw his searching me advertising he requested to be posted on August 11 of 2015 on Chinese Consulate website.
http://newyork.china-consulate.org/chn/fwzc/zxtz/t1070938.htm




Following was posted by my younger brother, as he told me, on August 29th of 2013. My father's one is August 11th which two weeks before this August 29th which means unlikely an automatic extension.(2013年是我弟弟所登。但这2015年是在到期2个星期之前,不是什么自动延期)。
(http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/cgny/chn/lsyw/lsbh/xqxx1/t1070938.htm)



----February 4th, 2018


听说了我父亲确实还在。
我的回应:听说今天早上的广播是乱七八糟的,不过结论就是我父亲还在,但不是由中国的民政系统提供生活资助。

因为我母亲在80年代时失去了退休金,2004年7月1日我信托财产那天有决定我母亲由我供给生活费用。我不记得我父亲的生活费用是怎么决定的,因为他应该有中科院南京紫金山天文台的退休金。不是我不肯替他付钱,我经历过中国的八十后年代,没有我在旁边盯着,他们根本没有可能用到这笔钱。我父亲居然会被恐吓而“失去”他的退休金,确实是挺吓人的。他有可能有一些紧急援助给付。

很多人都很奇怪,哪有可能会有这种传言, 其实这是典型的1980年代。这一份“哪有可能会就这样啊”可能是我父亲从地上自己爬起来,然后就这么没拿退休金提款卡就离开了家。他被这么赶出门后就被“宣告死亡”了。

我听说的传言是我父亲是被拖进小轿车里在被从启动的车里给推出去的。当时我父亲就被恐吓说不得报警,不得要求去拿退休金否则就没下一口饭吃。根据传言,我父亲是被中国的现任李总理给推出汽车的,又是在现任李总理在场时被恐吓的。我听说这传言是可以被卫星录像所核实的。

1980年“就是这样”的意思就是说没有任何事先的考量以确保我父亲可以从地上能够自己爬起来,没有事先的安排以保障我父亲有饭吃有房子住,而在把我父亲推出车说完这些话之后,我父亲就和他们这一车的人没有任何关系了,除非我父亲敢去报警,或者吵着要退休金。我父亲不是弄的清这种语言机智的人。他就是站起来也没有拿退休金提款卡就离开家了。当我终于有了一点现金打电话回家时,我被告知我父亲是2013年10月4日“去世了”。 我熬过了2014年类似这种“哪有可能”的时期,2014年底我一听到我就是应该生活在贫困里就是应该在我现在这个房子里穷死,我就开始报警了。

1980年代的另一个“就是这样”的例子,就是如果你手上没有一张银行的提款卡,或者银行的月结单,就是那同一个曾经帮你开户的银行职员会告诉你完全不知道你是否有银行户头在他们的银行里。如果你去清晰频道广播公司(IHeartRadio)探寻我的主要人物的那份收入在哪,你会听到标准答案"我们账上没有这笔钱”。我至今没有收到一分一厘,我也没有任何线索可以说请究竟是什么广播剧,尽管那是一个曾经如此全球红火的广播剧。2016年时,我还在波士顿96.9FM上时,从听说广播公司要付这30亿美金主要人物费用了,到广播公司付出后由Jessica那一帮人拿走,就是一副天经地义,到今天,我就没看见这30亿美金。因为我手上没钱所以请不起律师没有办法打官司。我是就此报警了。

我在找我的父亲就是因为我看见2015年8月11日等在外交部网站上的他在找我的广告。
http://newyork.china-consulate.org/chn/fwzc/zxtz/t1070938.htm

----2018年2月4日。

Saturday, February 3, 2018

02-03-2018 Authorized Providing to me from an Investment would be eventually deducted from my owner's account in my trust which should not be mistaken as a donation. (投资企业经授权所支付给我的费用最终是从我所继承的信托里我自己的东家账户中扣除,这些钱从来不是捐款。)

老爸爸方文海,你其实是被我给信托了, 我所信托的财产很安全,你也很安全,请尽快和我联系,或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227,或者和美国上海领事馆联系要求美国公民的紧急联络服务(021-8011-2400, 属美国公民服务),我已经和他们都联系过了,美国上海领事馆也已经打电话和我取得联系,他们有我的有效联系方式。(联络信息在01-19-2018的文章里)。你如果智能手机以及可以使用无线上网的电脑(一体机电脑,手提电脑,平板电脑等),可以使用手机上的《移动热点》功能通过电脑的《无线上网》功能上网。紫金山天文台的联络信息: http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/

妈妈王博贤,听说了你有收到我的信托提供给你的健康照顾,我相信你很好,我会想办法如何可以和你取得联系。爸爸目前和我也失联。你要是能看到这个博客,就去图书馆办个图书馆卡用somebodyinma@gmail.com 和我联系。用手机上的《Email(电邮)》功能就可以。
(*我目前不是太清楚我母亲是否也有故事,她是2007年“去世”。一切就为我的一些爷爷们在我出生前就替我办的信托,。只有我有,我父亲没有。据说抢夺这份天上掉下来的财产以及我丰厚的智慧产权收入,闹得确实很吓人。我也不太清楚。)


02-03-2018 Authorized Providing to me from an Investment would be eventually deducted from my owner's account in my trust which should not be mistaken as a donation. (投资企业经授权所支付给我的费用最终是从我所继承的信托里我自己的东家账户中扣除,这些钱从来不是捐款。)


Heard this morning's talk about a Shanghai Investment.
My response: It is my apology to this Shanghai investment if my father just goes demand money without an authorized attorney's letter.

This Shanghai investment is invested by the Fund that causes O'Connors’ confusion. I heard Shanghai investment's management is aware that the American Investor Fund has a British Parent Fund as well as a French grandparent Fund.

I am the British East India Financier because my trust is the Investor of the British East India Financier Fund. The British East India Financier Fund is the investor of this Shanghai investment's American investor which make my trust an investor of this Shanghai investment.

My owner's accounts are all in the trusts that I inherited, not in this Shanghai Investment, this Shanghai Investment only has its American Investor as its Owner in its accounting book. So, even this Shanghai investment is an investment of my trust, it is not appropriate for my father to ask for providing from this Shanghai investment without appropriate authorization.

It is just like a banker who owns 10 restaurants, it is more appropriate for the banker to ask his manager who works with him to look after all these restaurants if he needs anything from these restaurants because not necessary all restaurants' staff know this banker. I am the same. I am privileged to leave an effective message to my digital recorder to my entrusting attorneys, my father should have the same privilege but the best is to contact me to avoid being neglected feeling.

I am asking my father to be patient, we are improving. It is a common sense that my father won't be in his current situation if I have been good, and we are in our current situation already means my attorneys must have been very busy. And I know, at least, the American law enforcement has been very busy ever since I started to call their help.

If my father has appropriate authorization to be provided for by this Shanghai investment, this Shanghai Investment need to book this providing from its American Investor's Owner's Account which means my father's providing would be deducted from the profit that this Shanghai investment owed to its American Investor's, the American Investor would deduct this providing from the British East India Financier Fund, and go on that eventually my father's providing would be deducted from my owner's account's receivable in my trust. So, if this Shanghai Investment is instructed by its American Investor to provide from my father from American Investor's owner's account, the providing is lawfully provided for my father's exclusive usage because it is eventually my providing for my father. None of this authorized providing should be mistaken for some donations.

I heard my father has an attorney's letter but I do not have any such letter myself, so I am asking my attorneys to check out what is the complaint this Shanghai Investment has filed.

----February 3rd, 2018

Heard what happened on the radio program and related is because it is a CIA project.
My response: No such thing. The rumored U.S. Military CIA personnel is a Miss Pejoves whose last name already means she has huge interest conflicts with me. Her involvement in all kinds of radio program related may have sparked such rumors. I heard U.S. Military has no such CIA project targeted me as rumored, it can be verified if what I heard is true.

Another group people that may spark CIA project rumors is the Chinese 1989 Student movement group. That is obviously impossible anything valid.

I heard the American Pejoves Fund I inherited through inheriting my trust is the investor Fund of Ford's Holding. I have nothing to do with Ford name as Ford house announced.

I heard there are tons of business peoples are so annoyed that I announced this American Pejoves Fund, O'Connors' confusion Fund, both French Funds' American Investments and the Portugal fund's American Investment as $200 Billion each incorrectly which is not encouraging, so I change my announcements now that from this day of February 3rd of 2018, all these funds I inherited that I mistakenly announced $200 Billion each are now officially going up to at least $2000Billion each.

----February 3rd, 2018

Heard this morning's crying talk about where's her grandparent's money.
My response: I repeat what I said in the morning that her grandparents never told me.

Explanation: I heard her grandparents(方智强) died in 1961, I know my grandparents died before and in 1965. I was born in 1967, I never met her grandparents or my grandparents. My father never even heard his own father's secret money hidden place. How could I possibly know where her grandparents hid their money?

Regarding if my attorneys have her grandparents money, I say everyone already knows my attorneys are good enough to inform her if they know her grandparents' money hidden place.

And if I hear any rumor about her grandparents' money, I can tip law enforcement since unlikely unaware where she is can be the reason.

----February 3rd, 2018


Heard some confusion why I make such a big fuss about my father.
My response: My father is alive. He was threatened not to call police as well as not to take his pension. My father was told he won't be tolerated to live if he dares to demand his pension. I heard it was recorded by Sattelite image when he was pushed out from the moving vehicle. The female who threatened him is also a granddaughter of Fang, Zhiqiang(方智强). I am not certain if the name is correct by most likely a cousin to my grandfather 方智仁. My father is not the person knows what she said only means by dictionary definition and never imply anything else. My father did not take his bank card with him when he left his own home. He probably thought how could it possibly mean anything malicious just like what I had been through in 2014 time. In 2015 after I became a sworn U.S. citizen, I was yelled at that I should throw out my no longer in use Chinese passport. I did not listen. I have called U.S. law enforcement's help after I heard this rumor.

----February 3rd, 2018


听说了今天早上谈到的一个在上海的投资企业。
我的回应:如果真是我的父亲方文海在没有适当的由授权律师所出具信件的情况下就跑去找他们要钱,我替我父亲方文海向他们道歉。

这家上海企业是有一个美国基金投资的,也就是让两百多个O'Connors为谁才够资格做东家而困扰不已的那家美国基金公司投资的。我听说了这家上海企业很清楚他们的美国基金投资公司是有一家全资的上级英国公司及全资的上上级法国公司的。

我是英国东印度公司的投资人就是因为英国的东印度公司是由我的信托投资的。英国东印度公司的法国投资公司是这家上海企业的上上上级投资公司,所以我也就是这家上海企业的投资人了。

我的主家资本账户是在我所继承的信托里,不在这家上海企业里, 这家企业账本上只有其上级美国基金投资公司作为主家有主家资本账户。所以尽管这家上海企业是我的信托所投资的,尽管方文海是我父亲,他也不可以在没有授权的情况下直接跑去公司拿钱。

就象有个银行家开了10家饭店,这个银行家要是需要什么东西,最恰当的就是联络和他有直接工作关系的替他照看餐馆的经理,因为那些餐馆员工不见得人人都认识这个银行家。我也是一样。我是在我自己的手机录音机上就可以有效留言给我的信托律师,我父亲应该也可以。但我父亲最好是和我联络以免感觉被忽视了。

我要劝我父亲耐心点,我们的情况已经在好转。众所周知,如果我的情况好,我父亲就不可能是现在这份处境,而我们是现在这份处境,就已经说明我的律师们是很忙很忙了。我知道的是,至少是美国的执法机关在我寻求他们的帮助开始就是忙的不得了。

如果我的父亲是有适当的授权而由这家上海企业支付费用,这家上海企业是把这份替我父亲支付的费用从其上级美国基金投资公司的主家资本账户里的应缴盈利部分扣除,而这美国基金投资公司再把这笔钱从其英国上级投资公司的主家资本账户里的应缴盈利部分里扣除,持续如此,最终就是由我自己的信托里的我的主家资本账户里的应收账款里扣除。所以,如果这家上海企业在其美国投资公司的授权下,由其美国投资基金公司的主家资本账户里替我父亲支付费用,这份费用付款是合法支付而且只能被我父亲使用,因为这些钱最终是由我替我父亲支付的。所有这些费用支付都不应该被误认为是什么捐款。

我听说我父亲去要钱是因为他有一封律师信,但我自己没有什么律师信,所以我会让我的律师们问一下上海企业投诉的究竟是什么呀。

----2018年2月3日。


听说了广播剧及其相关的这一片混乱是因为这是美国中央情报局的一个工作项目。
我的回应:没有这回事。传说中的美国军方CIA人员是一个Pejoves小姐,这个娘家姓氏就已经告诉你她和我之间的利益冲突关系了。她的介入参与广播剧及其相关事宜,可能是造成这些传言的原因。我一听说美国军方从未有这么一个针对我方敏的CIA工作项目。至于我听说的是否正确,那是可以核实的。

那一组可能造成所谓CIA工作项目传言的就是89年学运在海外的那批。这个一听就知道不太可能了。

我听说我通过继承我的信托所继承的美国的Pejoves基金公司就是福特控股的投资人基金。就如福特家族所宣布的,我和福特这个名字一点关系都没有。

我听说有一堆的生意人对于我把我所继承的美国Pejoves基金,让O'Connor家困扰不已的那家美国基金,两家法国基金所投资的美国基金,以及葡萄牙基金的美国基金被我大概说成每家$200Billion美金很不爽(都不止这个数,嫌我这么说好像没有祝好运),所以我改改。

我现在郑重声明,所有这些被我宣布我所继承的每家$200Billion的美国基金公司,从2018年2月3日的今天开始全部正式成为至少每家$2000Billion美金的基金公司。

----2018年2月3日。


听说了今天早上的哭诉提到的她爷爷奶奶的钱在哪里。
我的回应:我重复我早上说的,也就是她的爷爷奶奶从来就没告诉过我。

解释:我听说她的爷爷奶奶(方智强夫妻)是在1961年就去世了,我的爷爷奶奶是在1965年及之前就去世了。我是1967年才出生的,从未见过她的爷爷奶奶或是我的爷爷奶奶。我父亲是连他自己亲爹的钱藏哪儿了都没有听说过。我哪里会知道她爷爷奶奶把钱给藏在哪儿啦?

至于我的信托律师会不会知道她爷爷奶奶的钱藏在哪儿啦,我得说清楚现在应该所有人都知道我的信托律师诚信很好,要是他们知道她爷爷奶奶的藏钱处,那一定是会通知她的。

至于我要是听说什么消息,我可以通知警方,不知道他们在哪才没给钱是不大可能的。

----2018年2月3日。


听说了很多人很气愤我为什么拿我父亲说事。
我的回应: 我父亲还活着。我父亲是被恐吓不准报警,不准去拿他的退休金。我父亲还被警告说如果我父亲要是敢去闹着要领退休金,他就没有下一口饭吃。我听说这一切都已被卫星图像记录下来了,就是在我父亲被推出已经开动的汽车摔倒在地那天。那个恐吓我父亲的女的是方智强的另一个孙女。我不清楚名字对不对,但估计是我祖父方智仁的智字辈堂兄弟。我父亲不是听得懂这种按字典定义说话没有任何其他意思的语言的人。我父亲离开家时没有带着他的银行卡。估计我父亲是认为一切出于善意,就因为哪有可能会是恶意啊。我2014年时也是如此。2015年我成为美国公民后,我是被吆喝着一定要我扔了留作纪念用的中国护照,我没理。听到这个传言,我是在美国报的警。如果我父亲现在还是中国公民的话,就必须把户口给恢复了,是必须。

如果我说的不对,请纠正,但要是说我敢这么说出来就不配是中华民族的英雄,我说还是让那个方智强的孩子们成为如此捐躯的“中华好儿女”吧。

----2018年2月3日。