Home

Three elements to recognize if it is an opportunity to succeed:

1) Can you understand the frustration expressed during the conversation to identify the possible causes of the frustration?

2) Can you identify if you can offer some help from your knowledge, experiences, and expertise?

3) Can you effectively communicate your expertise to be understood as possible helpful solutions?

----Min Fang, July 10th of 2019


Featured Articles

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

02-22- 2019 The reason for an attending phenomenon on July 1st of 2004 (2004年7月1日那天为何那么多的政府参与电讯会议?)

02-22- 2019 The reason for an attending phenomenon on July 1st of 2004 (2004年7月1日那天为何那么多的政府参与电讯会议?) 


Heard a lot confused, if it was my entrusting related meeting, why so many public officials were presented on July 1st of 2004's teleconference?
My answer: That was because it was the day right after June 30th's revolutionary talk about the invention of smartphones, also it was also the mid-term election time when economic development was very important topics to the running Republic party. A lot of conversations were about international economic development as well might be the reasons for worldwide governments' participation.

I was impressed on June 30th already right after finishing smartphones' related conversation, tons of people, who may have been informed by their associated, had "phoned me" asking if there are other investments opportunities because the smartphone-related were all overcrowded already. So many people feel so bad so they eagerly helped out by asking if there can be more ideas to create more investment opportunities? The next day which was July 1st, one can really use "people mountain people sea" to describe the teleconference attending phenomenon.

I got a lot of luck that day as well that I earned a lot of intellectual rewards from all those economic development related conversations. If some say that I should return the favor of opportunity granting from those public officials, I say the huge tax-incomes and job opportunities created for economic development have been all they have been working hard for, which should have been what drive them to serve the public as well.

It has been rumored in Chinese communities abroad that 1989's Student movement related teleconference was the reason I could have such opportunity to be such privileged by the U.S. government, this blog article is the clarification of such rumors. The entire teleconference on July 1st of 2004 was all economic-centric and related.

----Feb 22nd, 2019


听说华人社区及中国大陆很多人都很奇怪如果只是我的信托相关会议,为何2004年7月1日有那么多的各国政府官员参与?
我的回答:那是因为2004年6月30日那天有关智能手机的一场谈话对美国经济可能发生的正面影响所引发的,而且当时正在进行的美国总统中期选举可能是美国当时执政的共和党踊跃参与及组织各种相关会议的原因。有些话题因为国际层面的经济发展,可能是很多其他国家的政府也踊跃参与的原因。

我本人影响最深刻的就是6月30日智能手机谈话一结束,相关各方人员都在准备如何进行这场通讯革命的时候,估计大量的各方投资人就都被亲朋通知参与会议,我自己一下就被各方“致电查询”是否还有投资机会?智能手机的投资机会已经满额了。没有办法,当时是各方人士都在积极安抚这些致电查询人士,都在帮忙想办法看还有什么是可以创造一些投资机会的。第二天就是2004年7月1日那天,更是可以用“浩浩荡荡”来形容参与会议人员。

我占很大便宜了,因为很多涉及地区及行业经济发展的相关话题,我有机会拿了很多的智慧专利收入。有人会说我是否应该考虑回馈给创造这机会的那些从政人员?我说所创造的大量工作机会及高额税收就已经是他们最想要的了,这应该也是他们作为从政人员致力于发展经济的一个重要动力。

有很多国内人员听说1989年的全国高校会议是我在美国受到美国政府如此高规格待遇的原因,根本纯属误传。当时整个会议都是关于经济发展,以及由经济发展所延伸的。

----2019年2月22日。


Heard tons of rumor that it is understood as my own willingness to watch others take over my money.

My answer: This has been ridiculous rumors the entire time.

This rumor started since July 1st of 2004. It was a conversation that I was asked what else I would like to spend on my money, I said I am a business person that believe in making customers favorable products as long as it is a fair competition that regulated by laws, and I came from China that I enjoyed the United States lawful governing very much that I would be willing to encourage to make it even better.

I heard rumors that my complaints about I can't receive intellectual reward payment and living expenses payments are all related to the hypothesis that "this is a distribution channel market that refusal of distributing is the power" that no one can do anything about, especially those payments from Trusts are all strictly to be through fixed distributing channels. And any financial loss should be understood as my own willingness to be sacrificed to improve related laws, which is an untrue statement. Plus, any such things are possibly violating criminal laws.

I was willing to encourage to improve laws, but it does not mean to encourage to take advantage of the weakness of laws which normally are understood as "should be convicted as guilty if intended to take advantage of".

So, I refuse to be a victim. And I know I have been protected by laws already.

----Feb, 20th, 2019, updated on Feb 22nd, 2019