03-13-2018 About Managing or Governing （有关管理或者治理 ）

03-13-2018 About Managing or Governing （有关管理或者治理 ）


Heard this morning's talk about if I am the heir of my ancient Emperor grandfather.(中文附后）
My response: I am truly the heir of Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong （唐太宗李世民) by blood and family inheriting rule. I did inherit trusts that set up for me with titles and wealth.

Confusion of Charity and Providing

Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?

Why my lawful private wealth’s inheriting is Chinese government's Sovereign Issue?


----March 13, 2018


Heard a lot of saying if I know anything about managing.
My response: Well, certainly I do. I learned managerial skills through my work experiences of being an employee and being an independent researcher.

In China, we have a saying that you need to know how to be beaten up before you learn how to beat in Kongfu.

This saying never means that a Kongfu beginner deserves to be beaten up but to say that learn to protect oneself and learn to defend oneself is the beginner's class for kungfu or marshall arts.

It is the same about knowledge on managing or governing.

If a shool-graduated person is never employed as an employee that has been managed, this person may never know there are so many issues in any business or non-business operation that need some managerial skills to identify, to sooth and to resolve.

If an employee has not changed any employer in this employee's work experiences, this employee may never know there are so many different styles of managerial skills or what is effectively managing that is welcomed by those being managed.

If this school-graduated but never employed person think this person self can manage without being managed experience, well, this person may never know what is effective managerial skills or even lawful managerial skills.

If an employee who does not know how to learn managerial skills from being managed experiences, the promotion of this employee who has rich being managed experience won't benefit the business as well as the employees of the business.

There are a lot of issues between me and some of the 1989 group abroad related to this. I say they do not have the work or social experiences to be the real 1989 group and they feel their proved managing talents have been ignored.

----March 13th, 2018


听说了今天早上提到的我是否是唐太宗的继承人。
我的回应：我确实是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人。我的继承是按照唐太宗李世民家里的血脉传承继承规则。我确实是继承了一些为我设立的托付了丰厚财产及古老头衔的信托。

慈善和供养的混淆

不是同一个帐本以及谁会用本名来作为投资账户的名字来到处投资啊？

我私人财产继承怎么成了中国政府的主权问题了？

----2018年3月13日。


听到了很多有关我是否知道什么是管理的说法。
我的回应：我当然知道啊。我是通过做工的经历以及做了独立研究人员的经历学到的管理。

在中国有种说法就是如果你想学武打功夫，你就先得学会如何挨打。

这种说法可不是说武打功夫的初学者就是应该被人打的鼻青脸肿的，而是说如果想学武打功夫的话，就得先学会如何保护自己以及如何进行有效的防御。

有关管理或者治理的知识也是如此。

如果一个受过学校教育的毕业生从来没有一份替人做过工的经历，这个人可能永远都不会知道在任何一个企事业单位日常营运中会有那么多的问题需要管理技能来予以识别，来予以轻重缓急，来予以处理。

如果一个替人做过工的人从来就没有换过老板的工作经历，这个做过工的人可能就永远都不会知道世上有很多很多不同的管理方式以及什么是有效的并且受到雇员欢迎的的管理方式。

如果一个受过学校教育但从来没有替人做过工的人认为可以凭着自己的理解来管理，那么这个人可能永远都不会知道什么是有效的管理方式甚至说是合乎法律的管理方式。

如果一个替人做过工的人不知道如何从被别人管理的工作经历里学习一些管理技能，那么提拔了这个有着丰富的被人管理经历的人并不能够让任何一个企事业单位以及单位里的员工受到任何益处。

我和海外的一些1989年学运人士的矛盾在很大程度上都和这有关。我说他们根本就没有任何工作或者社会经验说他们自己是真正的89年学运组织者，他们就觉得他们自己那份已经在1989年的学运中得到证实的管理组织才华及能力在海外被忽视了被轻蔑了。

----2018年3月13日。

*还有，就是有些华人因为很喜欢某一家企业或者某一个职位，经常会想一些办法来保障自己的这个职务的“安全性”。其实这种理解很不安全。因为一但有意识地想把这份职务的安全感掌握在自己手里，往往就会采取一些让管理人员“没有办法管理”的做法，而这做法一旦开始就已经将自己放在了管理人员的对立面上。管理人员的能力是通过是否有能力对员工进行管理来体现的。其实在工作中学到的知识以及经验才是职场安全的保障，只是工作地点或者说只是在那里拿工资而已。

----2018年3月13日。

03-11-2018 Confusion of Charity and Providing (慈善和供养的混淆)

03-11-2018 Confusion of Charity and Providing (慈善和供养的混淆)



Heard confusion about how I could possibly entrust my parents on July 1st of 2004.（中文附后）
My response: I entrusted caring for my parents to be provided on my behave since July 1st of 2004.

----March 11th, 2018


Heard this morning's talk about "as long as my name not in each business' capital account, I can not say I have money".
My response: This is possibly a criminal effort of blocking me to spend my own money but attempts to transfer my own lawful money for illegal usage.

This saying is equally saying that if I have used a pseudo name(a company name) to open a bank account(capital account), even with bank employees testifying that is lawfully my bank account by internal instructions as well as by supporting legal documentation, as long as my name(Min Fang) is not printed or stamped on each single paper dollar bill that has been saved in that bank account, I should not be allowed to spend any money that is saved in that bank account.

Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?

----March 11th, 2018


Heard this morning's talk about deserved providing as charity.
My response: Charity means to help to survive, charity never meant to privilege free and easy luxury living.

If you listen to what has been demanded in this morning's talk, you would recognize that is not from any sort of surviving needs. I refuse any of these demands.

The People's Republic of China also has its own government-run welfare system (民政局) and Non--Government Organization provide charities.

If anyone needs charity to survive, please feel comfortable to go to any charity because that is what charity is about, you will be helped if you are qualified. My trusts have been supporting charities through local investments.

---- March 11th, 2018

If a business is my investment and this business is supporting charity, what that got to do with me?
My response: The charity expense is deducted from a Business' operating expenses.

This means
The government is supporting this business doing charity by freeing tax on this charity expenses.
Investors support this business doing charity by freeing investors' profit-share of this charity expenses.
Business management and employees support this business doing charity by earning this much money to do charity.

If a business is my investment that has supported local charities, it certainly means I have supported local charities from my profit-share that has used as the charity expenses.

----March 11th, 2018


Heard this morning's talk about these from the People's Republic of China are the ones who truly know what is the true meaning of Communism.
My response: I gathered from rumors I heard about the radio program that the Communism in the People's Republic of China means "Sharing one wife to share everyone else's wealth."

I gathered this is absolutely from the Communism concept that everybody should do the best everybody can and everybody deserves to get what everybody needs, and I gathered it  is interpreted as what all this person can do is to have sexual intercourses and this person indeed works very hard on it daily if not hourly, isn't this person deserves to get what this person truly needs which is an easy luxury life that should be provided by everybody else?

I came from the People's Republic of China, I am a U.S. citizen now and I was never a Communist party member, but I have my different understanding I learned through my growing up years in the People's Republic of China about what motivated Chinese Communist party to be such an overwhelmingly popular party ever since it was established in 1921: To serve the people, to create a better life through hard working with protected fair pay ensured by the government.

I refuse to be a provider of this "communism-style" providing on whoever's sexual intercourses work-experiences.

----March 11th, 2018


听说了有关我哪有可能信托了我的父母的疑问。
我的回应：我是诚信托付了从2004年7月1日起替我照顾我的父母。
----2018年3月11日。


听说了今天早上所提到的"只要我的名字没有出现在每一家投资企业的资本账户的户主名册上，我就不能说那是我的钱"。
我的回应：这有可能是企图不准我花我自己合法钱财而把我的合法钱财转为非法用途的一项犯罪行为。

这种说法也就是等同于在说如果我用一个假名（公司名字）开了一个银行账户（投资人主家资本账户），就算是银行的工作人员证明根据内部指示我方敏是那个银行账户的合法主人，就算同时也有相关的法律文件来证明我是这个银行账户的合法主人，只要我方敏的名字没有被打印或者是像盖章一样的盖在那个银行账户所存有的每一张美元面值的美金纸币上，我方敏就不准花这个银行账号里所存有的任何一张美金纸币。

不是同一个帐本以及谁会用本名来作为投资账户的名字来到处投资啊？

----2018年3月11日。


听说了今天早上所谈的"理应得到的慈善供养"。
我的回应:慈善是提供基本生存所需的帮助，慈善从来不是高规格优越供养免费奢侈生活。

如果你听一下今天早上的诉求谈论。应该可以听出那不是什么基本生存所需的诉求。我拒绝这类诉求。

中华人民共和国也有由国家政府的民政系统以及由非政府机构提供的以慈善目的帮助。

如果有人需要慈善帮助生存所需，请直接向当地的慈善机构提出申请，没有什么不好意思的，慈善的目的就是帮助解决生存所需的一些问题, 只要符合条件，你是会得到你所需要的帮助的。我的信托一直都有通过当地的投资支持当地的慈善机构。

----2018年3月11日。


如果一个企业一直都有支持慈善，就算这个企业是我的投资，可这慈善和我有什么关系?
我的回应：慈善支出是作为公司的一个营运项目支出的。

这也就是说
政府支持这个企业在当地做慈善是通过对这一笔慈善支出不收税的方式进行的。
投资人支持这个企业在当地做慈善是通过对这一笔慈善支出所需的金额不算做营业利润来进行投资利润分成的方式进行的。
企业管理层和员工支持这个企业在当地做慈善是通过努力工作挣出这一笔慈善支出所需的钱来做慈善的方式进行的。

如果我的一个投资企业一直都有支持当地的慈善事业，当然也就是说我已经有通过我在这个投资企业的利润分成在支持当地的慈善事业了。

----2018年3月11日。


听说了今天早上所提到的从中华人民共和国来的才是真正知道什么是真正的共产主义的。
我的回应：我从我听说的一些有关广播剧的传言中已经听出来这共产主义在如今的中华人民共和国就是指“先共妻（共一个女人做老婆），再共产（共其他人的财产过富裕日子）。”

我也听出来这说法绝对是从共产主义的定义和理念”尽其所能，按需分配”而来的。我也听出来对这定义理念的解释就是：其人所能就是男女性交，其人也已经尽其所能的就算没有时时男女性交也是竭尽所能日夜都在男女性交，难道其人就不应该得到其人真正所需要的舒适奢侈不用自己挣钱花的生活吗？

我从中华人民共和国来的，我现在是美国公民，我也从来就不是共产党员。但我在中华人民共和国成长过程中所学到的中国共产党之所以从1921成立伊始就成为在中国最受欢迎的政党的原因是：中国共产党主张国家政党政权是为人民服务的，是鼓励勤劳勇敢，独立自主地创建美好幸福生活的政党政权，全体公民有权充分享受在国家政党政权保障下的平等权利及按劳分配。

我拒绝成为这么一个有着”共产主义风格“而为其他人的”性生活工作经历“而付费的供养人。

----2018年3月11日。

03-10-2018 About my trust my grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong (有关我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托)

03-10-2018 A bit more About my trust my grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong (有关我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托)

Heard this morning's talk about what my father should do.
My response: Both my younger and I are in our late 40s now. My father has raised me and my younger brother with all he had.

----March 10th, 2018

Heard this morning's talk about my grandmother's “fight” with my great grandmother.
My response: I heard that was when my uncle, my father's youngest sibling, was only several years old.  That "fight" was because my grandmother wanted my great-grandmother took my uncle with her(my grandmother's) other children for an outing. My great grandmother just completely ignored the "fact" my uncle was crying hysterically non-stop.

All my grandmother's children are from my great grandmother. All my father's siblings share "the same birth mother, the same birth grandmother".

----March 10th, 2018

A bit more about my trust that my grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong.
My response: I heard it was said on the radio the total that received from my grandfather was "5 Million Chinese Silver Doller". I also heard that "10,000 Chinese Silver dollar in 1949 = ￥10 Million RBM in 2004".

If so, "500,000 Silver Dollar = ￥500 Million RMB".  Compare to the total of "5Million Silver Dollar", the size of the gift "50,000 Silver Dollar" I was willing to give to my father's and my grandfather's siblings is not shabby at all.

No wonder Chinese community abroad who know the price of the Silver Dollar never commented if "￥500 Million RMB" is shabby.

----March 10th, 2018


听说了今天早上所提到的我父亲应该怎么做。
我的回应：我和我弟弟现在都已经40多岁了。我父亲当年是倾其所有养大了我和我的弟弟。

----2018年3月10日。


听说了今天早上所提到的我奶奶和我曾祖母的一场“争执”。
我的回应：我听说了那是我父亲兄弟姊妹中最小的我叔叔只有几岁大的时候。那场“争执”是因为我奶奶要我曾祖母带着我的这个叔叔和我奶奶的其他几个孩子们一起出去玩。我曾祖母当时是”完全不理”我的这个叔叔当时已经是哭的“歇斯底里”的嚎啕不止。

我奶奶的所有孩子都是由我曾祖母所出。我父亲的兄弟姊妹们都是出自同一个亲妈，同一个亲奶奶。

----2018年3月10日。

有关我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托。
我的回应：我听说广播上讲的香港一共是收到了我爷爷所托付的五百万（大洋）。我也听说了“1949年时候的1万大洋 = 2004年时候的1千万人民币”。

如果是这样的话，“50万大洋= 5亿人民币”。和我收到的一共就只有5百万大洋相比，我最初愿意给我爷爷及我父亲的兄弟姊妹的·那份“5亿元人民币一家”的礼物规模可是一点都不寒碜。

怪不得海外华裔社区那些知道“大洋”价钱的从来就没说过我方敏给的礼物拿不出手。

我爷爷家里1949年解放前后是住在上海愚园路上的连栋6个三层单户的”人民小区“， 就在上海静安寺一个武警中队招待所的对面。当时是和我爷爷的一个朋友两家分租（各三个单户）。我爷爷奶奶和我的叔叔姑姑们一个三层单户，我曾祖母和我的父亲一个三层单户，另一个是杂用。我父亲从出生就一直是和我的曾祖母一起生活的，我父亲的叔叔姑姑未婚前也都很喜欢我的父亲。这是我愿意给我父亲的叔叔姑姑一家一份礼物的原因。

***现在我要降到“一家2千万人民币”的说法是因为他们六家（我爷爷和我父亲的兄弟姊妹）可能违反了“别闹腾”的条件。

----2018年3月10日。