06-03-2018 Wanton producers' whore curiosity can't be mistaken as the public curiosity

06-03-2018 Wanton producers' whore curiosity can't be mistaken as the public curiosity


Heard this morning's talk about why it takes law enforcement's help to have a providing check signed.
My response: Well, because there was some confusion if that British Investment in America is an independent American company or owned 100% by a British investor company.

I heard in the government records, this American company has been registered as a British Investment in America as well as paying taxes as a British Investment in America since the year 1600 or so.

I heard this confusion caused the American company refuses to sign the providing check as instructed by its British Investor was the reason for law enforcement's help to have the British Investor's instructed providing check signed.

I don't know a lot, but I am comfortable because what I heard tells me that my Trust is an investor from up-stream has been acknowledged and I have been protected by laws. I don't know anything beyond that there is some confusion but I am protected.

----June 3rd, 2018


Heard this morning's curiosity about how I provide for my children if I do have biological children?
My response: I heard that was the office-mate Raquel from Janus Associates. The intellectual income was the software based on Secure_Transport prototype that was broadcasted as the cool software that can transmit data securely together with video.

I heard my share of intellectual income from this software prototype has been either in investment on my behave with good intentions or have been "deserved taken with an announced ruling" which I have called law enforcement's help.

My biological children should have been provided for their daily expenses, and they should also have been covered by mine for emergency protection and special concerns such as skin care and cotton dresses. The arrangement for my side coverage was decided as not from my intellectual income.

----June 3rd, 2018


Exactly what is the public curiosity regarding my biological children?

My response: I heard there are "public curiosity" who is the exact "seeder" to them and exactly which bank accounts pay for them, I doubted this can be from any public curiosity, so I did call law enforcement's help on this possible child abuse intended and harassment intended.

From my understanding, the efforts to dig-out all from this producing group's curiosity is beyond normal or ordinary already, and all these intentions are to manage the "seeder's" underwear or to gain access to the "seeder's" underwear to trash the children and to have access to the bank accounts to steal or to publicly rob the money.

It is already well known they are not on any radio program producers' personal spending. It is never any wanton producer's deserves to know their exact whereabouts nor their exact financial situation, nor to express the wanton producers' own opinions on who can better serve their "seeder's" underwear, nor how unworthy the children can be to have a father who loves them only.

This is entirely the whores' curiosity, never a public curiosity.

----June 3rd, 2018

Heard producing team felt being dis-appreciated.
My response: How could I appreciate them? I can totally imagine what it is like when I heard those Fords' wives complaints broadcasted publicly on the radio program was "without searching the entire house, the process to verify that child is not associated with their marriage just can't finish." Why this is necessary? What kind public curiosity can it be?

She was announced in 2012 in the most comfortable way for all parties, for the best interest of that published girl as well, why searching everyone's house to impress the public just to publicly trash her as so unwanted by any Ford anyone ever heard of can be necessary to produce a radio program?

I heard there was some confusion if that is a physically biologically realistic child or just a painting is the reason for verification, well. why verifying it is a video of a biologically realistic child is not enough?

Why identify the birthfather, to interview the birth father and introduce the birth father to the public is so important? it is to whom it is so necessary that the birth father has to be presented?

For the best interest of that child, why the fact that the mother has own financial resources to support the child is not enough?

If there is any private curiosity or confusion, why this female or that female can be so privileged to ignore the fact that the United States laws forbid to abuse the child nor to harass the birth father in any way nor by any means? How dare this can be said as a public interest?

----June 3rd, 2018

06-02-2018 Do I dare to claim who I am after this morning's broadcasting? Yes, I do.

06-02-2018 Do I dare to claim who I am after this morning's broadcasting? Yes, I do.


Heard this morning's broadcasting of agitated cohort team.
My response: My personal opinion, if this is the cohort team I am a member of, why can't they confront me on the school blackboard? why the need to go the route of the radio program instead of getting the answer from me directly? I publicity is preferred, why not after confronting me and publish the answer together?

The great part is, this is the cohort team has technology person, several medical people, accounting person, a business professor, and a lot of them either are veterans or having Chinese colleagues or Taiwanese friends. The even greater one, this west coast college has a law school.

I already published some references on the blackboard in MBA506 to ask for the cohort team to confront me that I even sent out several emails asking, "please confront me". I am confident about my authentication regarding who I am, and I am a scientific-enough person to know it is realistic to adjust inaccuracy. I am comfortable confronting all these denials and seek the answer to why this organized denials regarding who I am? Why all these hostilities and who is trying to arouse these hostilities?

----June 2nd, 2018


Heard some agitation expressed this morning, I explain what I can.

1: Why the CEO refuses to talk about rumored "drag out" experience?
My guess: Possibly, the rumored experience is a pending lawsuit. If so, it is not a surprise because this is the United States.

2: Do I dare to claim I am a U.S. Military 3-Star General from now on?
My answer: Absolutely. The "verification" group is not the authenticating group nor any experienced investigating group so that their conclusion can't be the decisive one nor the authoritative one.

I was well-known recruited with a 3-Star rank in a teleconference in January of 2004 by the United States Military, I accepted with no pay and no station-office.
I was well-known asked to leave on July 1st of 2004 with the stars taken back in the teleconference.

I heard I was recruited as a 3-Star General Strategist of a research institute, a combat role.
I heard I have my rank kept because of my lifetime contribution.

So, I am a 3-star U.S. Military General Strategist.

3: Why I say I have children?
My response: Because it is announced with a published Digital Video that resembles me. I resemble my ancient grandmother of 7th or 8th century and I don't resemble any of my modern-time relatives.

The published girl resembles my grandmother from the ancient family painting that I have inherited, and she resembles me from a 2012-published 1997-recorded Digital Video. I heard she has a brother who also carries my blood.

I heard the broadcasted arguments were between some O'Connors and some Rockefellers, I heard both parties have been confused as the public and both are in-laws to some unrelated Fords, but how can that broadcasting be the reason that I should not have biological children? or how dare I say I have my biological children after that "so critical" broadcasting?

This entire time, this radio program has been ridiculous on who can have what sayings on what matters. In old saying, this is called "not behaving" or "not even educated" of the producing team, well, you heard the response that was broadcasted was they are the "proudly spoiled decisively powerful wantons".

----June 2nd, 2018.

06-01-2018 My Own Birth Grandfathers' love I received is also the huge responsibilities I inherited

06-01-2018 My Own Birth Grandfathers' love I received is also the huge responsibilities I inherited


Heard this morning's talk about the Cohort team.
My response: I have expressed myself as "I go to school for education, not hyperthyroid". So, I do my explanation on this blog, and I will stay clear of the anxiety from the excited cohort members. I am a resident on the east coast so I really don't know why they are this excited on the west coast.

This refusal to have hyperthyroid is also the reason I stay clear from this or that name who have their own confused romances with this or that man whom I have nothing to do with romantically. I refuse to build up some allergy symptoms if the blackboard posts are from free spirits.

I had been accusing this or that name's romances kept on harassing me whenever I try to study, now I get the points expressed that the intention understood was I study academically is to take over this or that wealthy man's family businesses. Well, the ridiculous thing is this or that man are not the same persons who have associated with me romantically for their own romances to have this misunderstanding or anxiety.

Some insist on this or that is the same person who moved on already. Well, if this is the case, it was already clarified on July 1st of 2004 that I can be consulted by his family businesses because of the romantic association, but my decision won't be the final one nor mandatory. The person himself is the decision maker on his own business as well as his own family businesses. I am the decision maker on my own businesses.

Do I have my own businesses to study for or to make decisions about? Of course, I do. I have very handsome blessing from my own birth grandfathers, and I already inherited them on June 30th of 2004 when I was only in my thirties, unlike this or that person who can be this lucky enough to still be an apprentice to their own loving Senior to build up the experiences.

I am not this lucky to be shielded by the loving protective Senior, I have been guided but I have no shelter to my own responsibilities on my inherited. My father is the typical scientific scientist and my grandfather passed away before I was even born. I understand the huge inherited wealth also means the huge responsibilities to look after what I have inherited. I am lucky enough already to be guided all this time by the great entrusting groups, and I am learning to have the academic knowledge to understand them.

I haven't been enjoying the luxury of my wealth nor having the luxury to experience any normal romance. I know it had been my own fault that I was not interested in dating at all before my inheriting. I am working on to improve my life quality because I want to enjoy my romance life at the same time when I can academically understand my entrusting groups.

I hope my decision on taking care of my parents' health has protected them well so I can reunite with them soon, I hope it can be soon enough that I can really look young and healthy pretty as I have wished, and I hope my healthy children are well-beloved and well taken care of when I am not around. I have not been available to my parents and my children, but I have been the "Western Union -- Connecting families around the world" to them ever since I inherited on June 30th of 2004.

----June 1st, 2018