02-28-2019 How could I possibly contribute to Viagra's lab-testing?

Heard about doubts how could I possibly contribute to lab testing? The doubts obviously from the fact I have very bony lousy hands which means no good at all in lab testing.

I heard this doubt is related to some Viagra related lab testing. Well, I have to say the lab testing can occur into my mind may purely because the basic "if... else..." training as a computer programmer. I don't remember if I did contribute but I can try to illustrate if I can.

Since I was mentioning about my understanding of human reproductive function on a June Sunday in 2004, well, of course, "if that thought can be helpful, what else need to be in consideration to ensure this 'application' to be fully successful?" is a computer programmer's thinking-route.

So, as an FDA-equivalent institute's former apprentice member of Health Department organized pharmaceutical industry's yearly Inspection group, and in a coercive tone that I learned from those health department's Inspectors, the thoughts might have been "you are saying this can improve male-sexuality? how effective can you define this improvement? and how stable this effectiveness can be? Is it still 'no one knows if it is the beauty or the wine' effective? And what will be the effectiveness comparison objectives? I need all these."

So, it would be how to define the effectiveness of this improvement, how to define stability (or effective scope), and what should be the test objectives are what I might have been contributed to lab testing.

----Feb, 28th, 2019

I heard I had been a quick learner of the coercive leader style who having this authoritative deep in-tone but easy apprentice appearance in pharmaceutical industry Inspecting related work experience, may be the reason I was criticized heavily by the former colleagues if I can be a person having any academic achievement even after I changed my profession to technology. I heard pharmaceutical industry personnel can easily relate me as one of the health department's Inspectors, but relate some former colleagues, if on Inspecting assignments, to own quality in-house assurance departments.

Also, I got the following test score from my MBA graduating critical thinking test, it seems I need to have the law education to improve, such an LSAT baseline score.

----Feb, 28th, 2019

02-26-2019 南京方面的矛盾 （16）-- 南师大附中，广播剧矛盾，及唐太宗李世民的继承人

Heard the anger that I have cash money with me but refuse to pay what I should and live comfortably.
My answer: I have been helped by laws to have a compromised thrift but not miserable living. I have been in a legal situation that I can't receive my lawful incomes is the reason I don't have a lot of money. Paying bills have been huge spending that can make my life very miserable.

----Feb. 26th, 2019


听说了一些关于广播剧的困扰是“如果没有这些独立故事支撑，广播剧的播出时间会短些，我的利润分成会少些，所以，如果我不拿钱出来，我就对不起南师大附中校友。”
我的回应是：这是误会。

首先，这些独立故事在广播剧超过10年高收听率的总播出时间上所占比例很小，其次，如果有时间，广播剧是可以充分展开一些相关内容的。广播剧因为时间的限制，对所播出内容所牵涉的背景资料知识没有充分展开，致使很多播出内容没有被并没有相关特定的专业知识背景的社会普通大众所听懂，这也是造成2017年美国广播公司对这一由中国总理和英国王子代为表达的问题做出根据法律而给出的公开回答后，至今尚未被南师大附中校友所听懂所理解的原因。还有一个就是广播剧那一个星期的播出对于我的唐太宗李世民继承人的介绍：

第一，用考古学的专业知识分析推理研究而得出结论说我可能是一千三百年前的唐太宗李世明的继承人而将我和爷爷唐太宗李世民连在了一起，

第二：用法律所认可的事实依据证实了我是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人，

第三，用历史学的知识说明了唐高祖李渊唐太宗李世民是东汉皇帝的继承人，而说明了历史上的汉唐一家，

第四，用一个法律上的我是一个东汉皇帝信托的唯一受益人而证实了汉唐一家。

但广播剧的制作没有就考古，法律，及历史对于该说明所需要的背景知识充分展开，是造成海外华裔非华裔社区普遍认可我是唐太宗李世民血脉传承的继承人，而很多不熟悉没有基本法律概念的中国大陆人士认为我是假冒伪造根本就是被外国势力扶持在讹诈中国政府的重要原因。

如果我的说法很不准确，请纠正。

----2019年2月26日，2019年2月27日更新。


还有，有关谁才是唐太宗李世民继承人一事，
我的说法：其实，究竟谁是继承人应该是按照唐太宗李世民自己定下或认可的家族继承规则而言，如有变更，也必须是由按照唐太宗李世民自己认可的继承规则而继承的人所更改的才是有效更改。按照唐太宗李世民自己所认可的家族继承规则，我父亲方文海和我方敏是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人。

我们家在唐朝历史上有一些皇帝不是我方敏的爷爷而是我爷爷的兄弟叔侄等，他们的后裔继承人应该说是他们自己这个皇帝爷爷的继承人，而不应该说他们自己是唐太宗李世明的继承人。他们自己的这个皇帝爷爷其实是他们这一支的起家立户爷爷。

----2019年2月26日

02-24-2019 What possibly "I am surrounded by the same school graduated" means?（ “我的一切都被同一个学校毕业的给包围了“究竟可能是什么意思啊?）

It may mean they are illegally privileged to block any financial payment to me.

The saying I heard is "This blocking effort is all about laws, not about if friendly or not."

If so, I need to ask the following questions:

1: Which part of the process of transmitting money payment to me is unlawful?

2: Is my name, or my SSN(ID), or my contact address unlawful? 

If all information about me which include my name, my SSN(ID), my legal status and my contact address are all lawfully correct, why it is forbidden to transmit money into my name related any financial account?

3: If it is not the transmitting money into my name account is illegal but the money itself, I must ask the question how you can verify if that is lawful nor not money being transferred to me?

Being a non-financial nor legal department employed personnel, how do you have the means to verify the lawfulness of the money being transmitted to my name account?

4: If you don't have the money lawfulness-verification capability, how do you have such privileged power to delete and/or change the money's lawful transmitting purpose to change money's lawful ownership?

5: If this is all about precaution in blocking payment to me because you thought it is never my money.

I have to ask according to exact what law this precaution, which includes delete payment and/or transfer out (not reject) money, can be authorized as lawful action? And why a regular employee can't do such a job but need specially recruit the same school graduated? 

It is all about laws which precisely is the reason I called law enforcement's help. 

It is imaginable how it has been in Boston where I am a resident of when all have such power to smear about me waiting for my living expenses payments. It may have started- off amicably, but now it is all so-despised, disgusted, and hate, nothing else. 

I, Min Fang, refuse to be a victim of such.

----Feb. 24th, 2019

“我的一切都被同一个学校毕业的给包围了“究竟可能会是什么意思啊?

这有可能意味着他们可以非法阻隔不让我收到任何财务给付。

我听说的态度是：“这一切努力都是关于法律，不是什么友善不友善的事“

如果如此，我就要问以下的问题：

1：究竟支付款项给我的过程中那一步是非法的？

2：是否我的名字，我的社会安全号码（身份证号码），我在美国的居民法律身份，或者我的联络地址电话，有哪一个是牵涉了非法？

如果我的姓名，社会安全号码，在美居民身份及所有联络地址信息都是合法，为何支付钱款给我是被你们所禁止的？

3：如果不是因为支付款项给我这个行为本身是非法行为，而是怀疑所支付的钱款是否合法，

那么我必须问一下，作为一个既非财务部门又非法律部门的普通工作人员，你又有什么方式和能力可以核实你所怀疑的支付给我的钱款是否合法？

4：如果你没有任何核实所支付钱款是否合法的能力和方式，你如何会有权力为了改变该支付钱款的法律所有权就直接删除甚至转出所支付的钱款？

5：如果所有这些小心防范行为是因为你怀疑所支付钱款从来不是我的钱，

我就必须问你，究竟是根据那一条具体的法律条款，所有这些小心防范包括删除付款甚至转出钱款是可以被认为是合法的？如果这种小心防范行为合法，那为什么普通的一般雇员不可以执行这份工作而必须特别招募“同一个学校毕业的？

所有这一切都确实是关于法律的，是我报警求助从未犹豫的确切原因。

可以想象我在麻州波士顿是什么样的一个处境，每一个都是如此的大权在握笑看我苦苦等着我的生活费用给付以及我失踪父母的消息。刚开始可能还算心态平和，现在我感受到的就只有鄙视，厌恶和仇恨。

我方敏拒绝成为这类行为的受害者。

----2019年2月24日。