04-05-2018 The O'Connor family's shared confusion is the reason of some O'Connor-s' frustration.

04-05-2018 The O'Connor family's shared confusion is the reason for some O'Connor-s' frustration.


Heard this morning's talk about notorious Tina O'Connor's "successfully conceived" story.
My response: My own children are factually not biologically associated with her birth children.

----April 5th, 2018

Heard this morning's correction on Mr. James Rockefeller's age.
My response: I have no problem to remove the Mrs. Petroeus title from Miss Jessica Petroves. It is still a great marriage even though she is a Mrs. Rockefeller only.

----April 5th, 2018

Heard this morning's talk about if my inheriting complete.
My response: It is none of anyone's business because I am the sole beneficiary person of the Trusts I have inherited. No confusion if there is any other possible beneficiary person so that there is no eligible person to confront anything about my inheriting. The money in those Trusts is none of anyone's business at all.

I am the sole lawful owner of those Trusts that set up for me.

----April 5th, 2018.


The O'Connor family's shared confusion is the reason for some O'Connor-s' frustration.
My explanation: To me, it seems O'Connor family's shared confusion is their great-grandfathers' contributions have been under-valued.

Also, it seems that some O'Connors' frustration is these arguments on what is appropriate recognization has gone beyond the boundary. By the way, these frustrated O'Connors are Politics profession O'Connor-s, Attorney profession O'Connor-s, and Accounting profession O'Connor-s.

Let me do the explanation on what I heard of.

About 200 years ago, there was a chance that the young United States needed a railroad. The company set up a team to compete for this opportunity with some other companies. The team worked as business representatives of the company to make all the contacts and to arrange all the necessary meetings, it took them over a year to present the company to be good enough for this railroad deal.

Well, Senator O'Connor's significant contribution was achieved quickly but not easily. Senator O'Connor's great vision and explicit points were expressed clearly by his robust elaboration to make everyone understood the importance of reaching this deal with the company. He achieved this deal by only several of his great speeches.

I heard both the representing team from the company and Senator O'Connor were greatly appreciated by the company. The appreciation was understood as appropriate by both the representing team and Senator O'Connor at the time.

The frustrated arguments I have been participating is O'Connor family shared confusion if their great-grandfather's contribution to the company has been undervalued because that deal was the fundamental reason of why the company is this great today.

Well, being a new immigrant who has not participated the glorious developing history of the company, all I could hear from these arguments have been "the Chinese don't deserve anything". And my frustration has been that O'Connor family can't ignore the fact it is the Trust I inherited that has been participating the funding to all these great achievements. I understand I have not sweated for this company's growth but I deserve to point out that the Trust I inherited is my ancient grandfather's hard-earned, and I do share the company's enthusiasm to support O'Connor family to devote themselves to serve the United States when O'Connor-s' talents were needed but public posts were not paid-jobs .

The reason of current argument if Senator O'Connor's contribution has been undervalued that O'Connor family deserve to have the entire ownership or some ownership of the company to justify it, to my understanding, is that some O'Connor-s have ignored the facts that it has been everyone else's sweats in that company to make that signed railroad contract a real transportation. To my understanding, this is precisely the reason some O'Connor-s are really frustrated about this beyond boundary argument.

The fact is it was the construction crews on the field sweating to lay down the logs, that fact is it was the management team who overseeing the logs been sent to the worksite, the fact is it was the administration team who ensuring those logs and construction crews got paid on time, the fact is it was the entire company's sweats to ensure those tracks kept on extending. O'Connor family can't deny it has been everyone's contribution to make the company this great today. Some said, well, the everybody employed by the company only got paid by salaries. I say, well, all those invested-in money only yield at an average of 5%-7% a year. *This Trust I inherited in 2004 has been investing in this American company through its parent company for about 400 years now.

By the way, I got the similar frustrations about my Intellectual Incomes from those frustrated O'Connor-s who understand it has been the sweats from the entire company. These frustrated O'Connor-s are the ones who have supported the understanding that it is the sweats from the hard working people in those companies that made Taiwan's touching glass an industry, not my two minutes brief "neuron talk", or my half an hour smartphone annoying conversation.

Well, I say to these frustrated O'Connor-s that if they believe their own great-grandfather's great vision and explicit points were the real contributions to the company, the same greatness as their own contributions they are currently making in their own professions, please don't say my hard-earned intellectual incomes are nonsenses. I have sweated 5 years in a medical college and another 2-plus-5 years in computer science to have the knowledge & vision to make that half an hour talk.

----April 5th, 2018

04-04-2018 Why not Seeking Free Volunteer Attorney's Help?

04-04-2018 Why not Seeking Free Volunteer Attorney's Help?


Heard this morning's talk about what it would be like if I "beg" for some help in Chinese Communities.
My response: I heard that was said by Lu, Pei ling（卢沛宁) and his rumored romance (mother of his child).

I was advised to seek free volunteer attorney's help through Bar Association's referral service. I did not go to a volunteer attorneys association in Boston once in 2015 to file bankruptcy to clean my band debts to open a bank account, but I was rejected because I stated in my letter that I have my inherited wealth under entrusting.

I have no problem to seek free volunteer's help when I am in need, and I have no reason to restrict myself to only seek help from Chinese communities because I can communicate in English about my frustrations thoroughly.

I haven't sought any free volunteer attorney's help regarding my frustration from the radio program, my concern is the possible hostility employment opportunity offering from the party who has been frustrating me.will have huge impacts on my lawful interests. If Jessica Petroves can spend $400K U.S.dollars a month to promote that I have no money, it takes a no-brainer to imagine that this Jessica Petroves would have no problem to offer this $400K U.S. dollars to employ an attorney who happens to be a volunteer attorney helping on my case. And I know for certain this Jessica Petroves is not the only person who frustrates me this way.

I have constantly called law enforcement's help and completely ignored "so annoying" rumors, this comfortableness is from the confidence I learned from the American cowboy movies what "the badge of laws" means to the United States' law enforcement, plus, I do have inheritances that come with local attorneys who can work with my entrusting attorneys if needed. I am protected by the United States laws.

I don't know what it was exactly like in this morning's broadcasting because of my own personal experiences regarding this same radio program, I have never met this Mr. Lu in any occasion, and I don't foresee that I would call on his help from his attorney's professional knowledge. So, most likely, I am being honest to state that I may not have the opportunity to meet this Mr. Lu in an occasion even if I am in a situation.

----April 4th, 2018

04-03-2018 $400 Million = $400,000 monthly providing X 83 years ( It is Never her saved money )

04-03-2018  $400 Million = $400,000 monthly providing X 83 years (It is Never her saved money)


Heard this morning's talk on a Jessica Petroves.
My response: I heard this is the family name associated with Javits Center in New York City as well as Ford Business. Obviously, she married well to be a Mrs. Rockefeller & Mrs. Petraeus.

But I don't get why she thinks I am so afraid of her? And why she needs me to be another terrified one? Obviously, her husband and her in-laws are all enormously terrified by her, it is really hard for me to imagine that strong attraction towards the multi-aspects of terrifying.

And I don't get the idea why she needs to spend her maiden monthly providing of $400,000 to tell everyone I have no money? Why would she say that could be a strategy when it is actually abducting me in poverty efforts according to the United States Criminal laws? I just don't get the idea what she intends to achieve? By the way, it was this Jessica Petroves this morning who announced my SSI from SSA would stop.

Also, why she insists on getting my money? The accusation that I spend some of her husband's or her inlaws money is a fake accusation if not misunderstanding. As far as I know, those accused unwillingly spending during the 2004-2005 time were all actually profitable investments on hot popular shows or profitable hospital that those popular shows already handsomely paid back their original investments together with the average yield returns (profits).

I am wealthy enough compare to her husband, I have no reason at all to need her husband's money. That $400Million paid-out by a Ford Business in Nov. 2016 or so is $400,000 thousands to cover my 2017 living expenses which would eventually be deducted from my own Trust that I inherited on June 30th of 2004, well, it has to be upon my receipt of it.

Conclusion: 
1: I am not the person and I won't be the person terrified by this Jessica Petroves because there is no imaginable reason at all.

2: That $400 Million is the size of over 83 years savings of every penny on a $400,000 per month budget which is so clearly obvious that $400 Million is never her money. Never her Money.

----April 3rd, 2018

Explanation: 

What I have inherited are trusts that my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was born.

My name (Min Fang) is in my trust (Example Name: XYZ), this trust XYZ has invested a company ABC, this company ABC only has the trust XYZ as the name of its investor in its capital account (owner's account which means company ABC's owner is the trust XYZ). The company ABC further invested a company ABC-1, the company ABC-1 only has the company ABC as its investor in its capital account which means ABC-1's owner is the company ABC, etc. that there are these company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1-1, etc. My named account (Min Fang) is only in my trust XYZ, but my providing can be paid by the company ABC-1-1-1-1 that later deducted from the company ABC-1-1-1's profiting share, and subsequently deducted from company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1, company ABC, and then deducted from my named capital account ( Min Fang's capital account) in my trust XYZ.

Another way to get my providing is to let my trust wire that money directly to me which is seldom used by investors because of inconvenience caused by tedious procedures. Also, the Investor's tax for each providing check is paid to the country according to its signing local company's geographic location.

----originally published on February 27th, 2018