Home

Three elements to recognize if it is an opportunity to succeed:

1) Can you understand the frustration expressed during the conversation to identify the possible causes of the frustration?

2) Can you identify if you can offer some help from your knowledge, experiences, and expertise?

3) Can you effectively communicate your expertise to be understood as possible helpful solutions?

----Min Fang, July 10th of 2019


Featured Articles

Thursday, September 26, 2019

Confusion about this blog's publishing

About my five announced 400Million payment, ①The third payment is from Rupuk Trust(李璟信托)。Min Rupuk is my birth name, Rupuk became a family name since the 1000 year ago Jewish marriage from Uighur area(新疆维吾尔族地区). ②The fourth payment is from Mercedes Trust, Min Mercedes is my birth name from a 500 hundred years ago Oldenburg-Mercedes marriage, Min Oldenburg is also my birth name. ③ The fifth payment is from Marcus Trust, Min Marcus is my birth name since the 400 years ago Stuart-Marcus marriage, Min Stuart is also my birth name. (05-22-2021)

Both the authenticness of my biological family and the lawfulness of all my financial incomes have been law investigated with factual truth-based conclusions. Issues with Chinese People and Chinese Community: Some of them are not demanding their fairness of what they should have earned from the LAW, some of them are not demanding their lawful inheriting share from their own biological and lawful marriage family, all these people are just demanding money as the desire of wish to own money, and with a tone that they are doing such a charity to only demand majority of what I lawfully own without taking my entire family's lives with the lawful wealth entirely.  I refused their charitable thoughts and action of such granted attitude to threaten my life and my lawful private wealth, I have asked LAW protection, and I truly believe they deserve law bullets in their heads to learn something.

To those academic veterans regarding if fair evaluation on the patent award: If you have received your copy of the evaluation report, you can check: ①how your award is evaluated and if it is a fair number, If my contribution helped you to be awarded, your own number will be discounted to reflect my contribution with your acknowledgment if fair at the evaluation committee meeting. I got nothing to do with anyone else. ②if your team's number is a fair number in your unit, ③ if your unit has a fair number in your division, and etc. All listed in your copy of the evaluation report. If you have any reasonable doubts about any of these numbers fairness, contact the 1800 number listed in the same copy of the evaluation report. About if I got my share fair? I don't think I got my number unreasonably and I am happy with what I got, but if any doubts are lawfully reasonable, fair evaluation matters is what I believe as well.

----04/29/2021


standard pad surgery for pandemic prevention (in person),6:30AM to 10PM,M-F daily available,currently open to government employee medical insurance. participating medical center: Alliance,Brigham,Cleveland,Deaconess,Eliazbeth. 
  • ①check participating local medical centers, and commercial sponsorship information if needed, from your health department colleagues, 
  • ②make appointments to the preferred medical center, special attention: sameday appoinntments are available now already since this April in Europe, Asia, Canada, USA.
----04/10/2021

A lot Hispanics wonder how I can be the only person to claim the ownership of the commercial landlot that my current residence locates? Answer: Because I am the sole beneficiary of a trust-investor of the landlot's owner company, the trust was set up by my ancient grandfather'Young Rupuk at about AD 1000. He was Southern Tang dynasty Emperor Jing Lee, Rupuk is his Uighur-mother‘s maiden name I inherited. Rupuk trust is my 2016-2017's $400Million living expense provider trust.  这是我博客上经常提到的自1967年7月开始汇款中国的那个美国公司的投资信托,也是我2016年至2017年四亿美金生活费的支付信托。就是位于南京的南唐中主李璟的英文名字,Rupuk是他继承的他维吾尔族妈妈的娘家姓氏,我在2004年继承。

To police officers regarding identity fraud and money lawful ownership: I am asking help on anti-harassment regarding remote medical treatement session that constantly being harassed becuase of the doubts if self-paid funding is lawful. It has been very harassive because there is a somebody constantly calling own private police officer friends who is not a local police officer that having the legitimate policing power to inquiry such citizen-obligational doubts on behave of this somebody in the medical provider facility, nor an investigator who has the legitimate investigation power to have some information authentic enough about this doubt, so I am asking all possible helps to help me to have a non-interrupptive medical session.
-- Min Fang (Min Fone, Min Lee), 06/14/2020

About authoritive denial of my biological family's history: Rumored Boston Magic 106.7FM weekends night-time-host James O'Neal is biological related to someone was from Shanghai Russian Prince Estate of 1900 times, I say to this Jamoe O'Neal: If authoritive denial has been from this "related to" reasons, I tip in authenticate information as following: 
  • From his Russian royal birth certificate, the boy's name was Alexander Ohnmor, his birth mother was Therese Petrovna Oldenburg Romanovsky, the boy Alexander Onhmor's birth father was Prince George of Russia. The boy born in 1894 was my great-grandfather who had a Chinese name 方蓠其, his birthmother (Russian Mistress) also had a Chinese maiden grandfather 蔚先, a Chinese maiden father 蔚前 and herself a Chinese name 蔚蓉, who was also known for her cat-yellow eyes and Asian smooth skin to both her maiden family-inlaws and those in Russian Prince Estate in Shanghai. I have inherited Ohnmor name  in 2004 from my ancient Mongol grandmother Yuelun Ohnmor (m. in 1260AD, Kublai Khan's daughter), her husband used Fone(方)as his surname which has been my family name, me and my father have used "Fang" as "方" translation, the same Fone grandfathers were all a heir-grandson to Chinese Emperor Li, Shimin (唐太宗李世民) that I claimed I am a heir-girl of since 2004.
----Nov. 16th, 2020

Chronicle Note _ My Ancestors 09/12/2020

Regarding anxiety angers from individually owned companies: 
  • You company should have a company registration license that clearly listed your ownership that I have nothing to do with.
  • I am the birthmark beneficiary of some ancient Trusts, any confusion regarding any investing- company's ownership is historically known to every related confused party, which should be nothing new, not beneficiary person particular, and not related to who beneficiary person is.
  • 10/27/2020
What "This American company never change hand for 600 years alreadymeans? The big American rich name who came to this land in 1650AD as the first generation immigrants were cousins from a shared grandfather that was only in-100-years, which means that all current American richname-cousins are offspring and family inherited from this one shared grandfather of 500 years ago, so that "600 hundred years never owned by a name" means the in-interest wealth has been for 600 years never owned by this shared one grandfather of all current children of this big rich name. It is the same to all 2004 related three American rich names. -- 08/24/2020


“已有六百年的投资历史是从未易手的”究竟是什么意思?

这些美国加拿大的著名超级富豪的祖先都是在1650年前后来到美洲大陆的,当时一同登上美洲大陆的是堂兄弟,而这几个兄弟的共同爷爷是一个1450-1550年前后的一个爷爷,这样,这家姓氏的所有美国加拿大富豪都是这同一个爷爷的后裔孩子,而美国司法部所核实的“这家指示付款的美国公司已有六百年从未易手的投资历史”的意思是这些富豪共同的一个爷爷及这个爷爷的所有后裔都从未持有这家美国公司的投资,而且美国这几家富豪都是如此类似情况,所以这家指示付款的美国公司是从未被洛柯菲勒家福特家和沃顿家所持有的公司。(08/29/2020)

为什么那些四亿美金不可能源自美国洛富豪的家族财产或者中国国内任何公司政府机关的公款?

我的解释:据说是依据美国司法部的调查。美国这边报道的是,根据美国司法部的调查,每一个四亿美金付款(共五个)的私人投资者都是一个在六百年前已经购买了美国的四亿美金付款公司的某个六百年前已经成立的非中国地区的投资者公司的股份,而且这个六百年前的非中国地区私人投资者的世代后裔在至今已经长达六百年的时间里从未易手这份投资。所以,每笔四亿美金(共五笔)的付款都不可能是美国洛富豪的家族财产或者中华人民共和国的国内任何公司及政府机关的公款。(11/03/2020)


Relationship between Trust, Investment, Wealth, Beneficiary

About curiosity regarding exactly whose wealth I have been claiming all these years? 
  •  I have been claiming my own Missy Fone's wealth!
  • It is very easy to verify if all those five years' providing Trusts I have claimed have been my Missy Fone's (Missy Lee's) wealth since 2004.
  • Family name changed from Lee (李) to Fone(方) around 1100AD (--06/13/2020).
The entire time, I have been introduced as 方家小姐(Missy Fang) but nobody realized I am actually introduced as Missy Fone. 

Fang is the People's republic of China's standard translation for 方,by my family use Fone since Kublai Khan's daughter Yunelun Ohnmor's husband Lin Fone who is one of my birthmark ancestors, his wife Yuelun Ohnmor has been verifed by US Justice Department as my birth grandmother ancestor, Yuelun's son is my next generation birthmark grandfather ancestor.

So, I am Missy Fone and I have been claiming my own Missy Fone wealth. It is very easy to verify if all those five years' providing Trusts I have claimed have been my Missy Fone's (Missy Lee's) wealth since 2004.

----April 22, 2020.

Basic Medical System are the full set of pre-quisite courses for clinical medicine major's specialty courses, so, no certificate after finishing all BMS courses but has valid transcript as the evidences of the qualification for futher specialty medicine major courses. I took all these courses, as part of the 1985 admission's pharmacology major class, with medicine major students in the sanme classroom, by same professors, in the same lab, and taking same exams.
  • *Specialty clinical medicine courses are generic surgery, specialty surgery, pediatrics, Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology(OB/GYN), etc,
  • * Pandemic-medicine school has its own medical related prequisites, but not the Basic Medical System and not provided by the clinical medicine school . 
    • In Shanghai Medical University, pharmacy major's medical prequisite are provided by Pandemic-medicine school.
----2020年6月19日。

About concerns over COVID-19:
I also believe in drinking half a cup of 10% saline water to do the full body cleanse if needed, but I strictly follow what my body desires that I will drink the full half cup only if I felt it is so delicious, which definitely means my body needs such cleanse (a bit or a quarter cup more if too delicious, and may be another half cup after five hours if still felt so delicious), and I will put on an extra layer to comfort my body when it turns to a slow mechanism to do the body-cleansing job. *Concerns are all about the cardio system and blood pressure. **10% saline water does mean 1 portion salt with 9 portion water. YOu can try to put some of this 10% saline water for your family beloved pet, see if they feel it delicious as well, please besure to have their water bowl fully filled.
----April 15th, 2020

Like a lot of kitchen people believe in baking soda, I totally believe in salt. I use ancient wound-cleanse antibacteria effective saline water (5% salt in distilled water or warm boiled water, 2 tsp per quarter),  to clean my kitchen, spray on grocery shopping bags, and do grocery preparing-wash. And I even bought a salt-inhaler (a asthma-patient-usage nebulizer, or a Mini Humidifier) so I can inhale some (5% saline salt-water fog) into my breathing system if necessary (*"No food or drink rule" applies for 30 minutes after each inhale-cleanse application of nebulizer treatment). ----March 21st, 2020

1:The confusion if my 2004's Trust-inheriting can be valid.
  • Related clarifications are in the numeric section “June of 2007's meeting” of <Three meetings in 2007 and related if I inherited confusion>, just scroll down to that numeric section.
  • It is best to ask your own private friend who is in the attorney profession to read it as well.
  • ---- January 11th, 2020
To law professionals:
There has been doubts if I am spending my own money on my remote-type medical care, and what has been clarified by Federal Justice Department as I known of?

My answer: What I heard is: $400Million and related other payments for each of these five years I published has been verified as lawful money source, lawful given, and lawful investor tax rate. The third year's providing-Trust I published has been verified as birthmark Trust-inheriting Trust. The third year means fiscal year started on October 1 of 2016.

The current confusion is if my current medical payment has been from this published five years, and if lawful if not one of the published five.  This confusion has caused a lot of employes of FBI agency and of Federal Justice department from Cinese community to be harassive and interruptive on my remote-type medical treatment. My complain is that this harassive and interruptive is beyond the disciplines of this two government agencies, and it has been unbearable to me.

So, I say, Can this generic legal concern be managed according to FBI and Justice Department's work protocols and disciplines? Those Chinese agents use their employment statuses to unauthorizely but forcefully stop my regular medical treatment has been very harmful to my biological health, not to mention how more harmful it can be from their enthusiam to conduct voluntary investiongation violently.

And, can medical providers' generic legal concern regarding if only making lawful money be addressed according to these licensed medical providers' standard procedures and protocols? Is it possible that medical and supporting staffs can imagine that they actual have some law professionals who work as their colleague(s) to protect them from this sort of concerns?

I refuse to receive voluntary & donation based medical care when I have my self-paid medicare availabe as lawful medicare program. So, from now on, I will address my patient-requests to self-pay remote-medical program that I am lawfully enrolled and has been supported by the  US law representive FBI Agency and Federal Justice Department.
02-06-2020

1:The confusion if my 2004's Trust-inheriting can be valid.
  • Related clarifications are in the numeric section “June of 2007's meeting” of <Three meetings in 2007 and related if I inherited confusion>, just scroll down to that numeric section.
  • It is best to ask your own private friend who is in the attorney profession to read it as well.
  • ---- January 11th, 2020

1-1: If curious how I got stuck in the "public denials" while Rockefellers got stuck in so many anxieties?
  • It was since the famous "marriage proposal discussion" on July 1st of 2004 when a handsome young Mr. Rockfeller was teased.
  • The innocent Mr. Rockefeller can not understand how it can be so unfair for a lady bride-to-be to bring her maiden family's same-size-wealth blessing to pass-down to her own blood birth-children but carry the groom's family name. 
  • The laugh was all around when the lady "bride-to-be" was negotiating, if getting married, how to self-indulge her-own-wealth while letting the "groom-to-be" to pay for all the thinkable and unthinkable for the entire marriage family for the years to come. 
  • Well, the "tragedy moment" happened when some Chinese parachutes jumped into the conversation to be the replacements of Rockefellers' such spending recipients, maybe from their understanding that negotiator does not have any wealth to be this teasing. 
  • Since that moment, I was completely dropped out of such conversation and got lost in the confusion and the public denial about if I have my own wealth from my Chinese birth grandfathers, while the entire Rockefeller names stuck in the bewilderment of why spending for years to come? 
  • This has been for the past big 15 years already. I still need to explain if I have my own money, while Rockefellers still fighting why it has to be their money to be spent? 
  • If you luckily still have that 07/01/2004's meeting-record, please verify this negotiation out and its prelude and its postlude, for some laughs and for some alerts.
  • It is best to ask your own private friend who is in the attorney profession to read it as well.
  • ----January 14th, 2020.
2:The confusion about if I published any Rockefellers' money as I claimed.
No, I did not publish any Rockefellers' money as I claimed.

All those companies I claimed have been doubted if this or that name's family wealth, the particular is the "Pejovic" company that I claimed as the third year's providing instruction company. This "Pejovic" company has never been owned by the "Pejovic" family historically has been clarified so that this company is not Rockefeller in-law's family wealth.

All those companies I claimed are not Rockefeller money because
  • Each of all of those companies I claimed is not owned by any individual Rockefeller's name as an individual investment.
  • Each of all of those companies I claimed is not owned by Rockefeller's names as the family names' shared investments.
  • Each of all of those companies I claimed has never been owned by any Rockefeller's in-law's family names as the in-law's family names' shared investments.
  • I am the Narylhn Khan has been verified, which proved that my wealth is from my birthmark Trust-inheriting has been the real story since 800 years ago.   
  • Reference: The confusion if I am an heir to ancient Chinese Emperors
  • 我是乌纳可汗,这一身份被证实为真实有效究竟意味着什么?很简单的,这意味着我的财产来自家族胎记为条件的信托继承的说法从此有了事实上的依据,以胎记做为继承条件不只是那些我近代的爷爷们给我的信托。乌玉的方姓丈夫和乌玉的方姓儿子是我的两代方家家族胎记祖先,我承载他们父子两代也拥有的方家家族胎记是乌玉儿子指定我为乌玉的可汗爵位继承人的原因,乌玉是1260AD年代的历史人物忽必烈可汗的亲生女儿(不是孙女儿)。
----October 3rd, 2019


3:The confusion about O'Connor's family name
There has been a lot of anger from O'Connor regarding my mentioning O'Connor names on my web blog. The reason I have to update my blog is to clarify some "why mention?", all the reason has been that I have been confronted fiercely or commented negatively, by O'Connor name's affiliated, regarding my inherited wealth I stated in my blog articles. So, I list my reasons why I agree there shouldn't be any mentioning for both parties:

1) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, that there shouldn't have any reason for any O'Connor affiliated to be confused about me stating my inherited wealth, nor for me to mention O'Connor name, which purely because I am not socially nor professionally associated with O'Connor name at all.

2) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, there should be no reason for me to be agitated regarding O'Connor name's family wealth, and there should be no reason for any O'Connor's name affiliated to be confused with my money and my money spending-ship, purely because O'Connor's family wealth is not associated to my inherited wealth.

----Sept. 26th, 2019

4:The confusion about my money-spending-ship and my any paid-in-full service:
I assume, all police officers and law peoples, at least in the United States, would agree with me that any money lawful ownership confusion can only be resolved by calling the police to do the law investigation, or file a civil lawsuit.

I firmly believe nobody can replace the police on law investigation or enforcing laws,

and I firmly believe nobody can replace the Judicial court on clarifying the money lawful ownership's legal confusion.

----Sept. 26th, 2019

Wednesday, July 24, 2019

The confusion if I am an heir to ancient Chinese Emperors

I am the anointed and biological heir to my ancient Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor 李世民:
  • I am the clearly anointed heiress who has  the family birthmark palms, 
  • I am clearly anointed by my recent generation grandfathers in their wills, 
  • I have the birthmark palms the same as the historically known birthmark inheriting rule of the ancient Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor Lishiming(李世民 )。
  • By DNA test result, I am the offspring of a known heir of the Chinese Tang dynasty Emperor 李世民。
我方敏是唐太宗李世民继承人是血脉传承的指定继承:
  • 依据已知的确定为唐太宗李世民家族的胎记掌纹继承规则,
  • 我是由我的近代爷爷方智仁,曾祖父方立柒,和曾曾祖父方治兴(单人旁)等的遗嘱所明确指定的生有家族掌纹胎记的继承女。
  • 我的掌纹符合已知的历史上的唐太宗李世民家族的继承掌纹。
  • 依据DNA鉴定,我是已知的确定为唐太宗李世民继承人的李始玉(?)的血脉子嗣孩子。
  • 摘自:华人好奇:"方敏,司法部是如何核实你是唐太宗李世民的继承人的?“
---- 2019年12月12日。

My Russian name:
  • Eпоттекатерина Николаевна Рома́новы
  • Yelottekaterina Nikolaevna Romanov (English)
  • 夏洛特卡特琳·尼古拉维纳·罗曼诺夫(中文)
  • I am from my great-great parents Russian Prince George de Beauharnais and his Chinese wife Therese Petrovna (蔚蓉).
  • My great-great-great grandparents are Grand Dutchess Emma Petrovna and her Mongol Khan husband Ohnmor.
  • My great-great grand father's chinese name was 方治寓 or 方治兴(单人旁)。My great-great-great grandfather's Chinese name was 方麟玉。
----September 12th, 2020
My promised French name for my "French Financier" newspaper entitlement:
  •  Le Cé'BonLieaufé WAYA(â)N-YONOH (汉译:李·奢邦丽艾傲妃·完颜育(汉名:育靓丽)), An objective achieved French name, a combined name of my family names from my grandmother-side and my father-side (Lieu, Lee, and Fang), and my great-grandmother's maiden Jurchen Wanyan (完颜育) family I am a doroi of (a Jurchen Duke's daughter). 
  • The newspaper entitlement "French Financier" is to the company that has been invested by a Trust from my another ancient grandfather, a famous Chinese painting painter, who is over 700 years more ancient than the husband of my great-grandmother baile Wanyan-Yu.  
  • Photos of Qing dynasty Emperor I resemble.and related
  • I am Jurchen Duke Wanyan-Yu, the doroi beile Yu (10/20/2019)
My pleasant British name for my "British Financier" newspaper entitlement:
  • Narylhn Wohnmor (pron: Narin Wohnmor;汉译乌纳:年轻初阳时候的玉纶·乌玛), a combined name Narylhn is from my Mongolian grandmother's possible first name "Yuelun", Mongolian word "Naran" and "Hin". Wohnmor is from my Mogalian grandmother's possible Mongolian entitlement-family-name from her maiden-father Kublai Khan: Ohnmor (or Womo?).
  • The newspaper entitlement "British Financier" is to the company that has been invested by a Trust from my another ancient grandfather, Southern Tang dynasty Emperor Jing, who is over 200 years more ancient than Yuelun's husband.   
  • Paintings of Yuan dynasty Emperor  I resemble and related.
  • I am Mongol Narylhn Khan (* a little not certain of Yuelun's begiven name -10/20/2019)).
  • I use my name Narylhn Ohnmor from today. (--04/27/2020)
----August 26th, 2019


How resemblance can decide I am an heir to Chinese Tang dynasty Emperors, but can't if tor Chinese Qing dynasty Emperors?
  • Qing dynasty Emperors' photos are collected from publicly accessible internet. Tang dynasty Emperors' paintings are from a private collection of family portraits that I inherited together with Trusts.
  • I was born to the Tang dynasty Emperors' heirship line and an acknowledged heir by Tang dynasty Emperors' entrusting letters (each settler's letter). I inherited some Trusts set up by Tang dynasty Emperors on June 30th, 2004.
  • I was not born into the known Qing dynasty Emperor's household, but into an in-law's whose family has generations of intermarriage history with Qing dynasty royals.
----July 24th, 2019


Photos of Qing dynasty Emperors:
Prince Gong: 恭亲王奕訢 (Previously marked as Xianfeng Emperor (咸丰皇帝))
These photos obviously presented a northern man's roughness. This is also what I look like very often when I was in college, especially when I was tired or exhausted sitting around bathing in the sun with a blank look and shining forehead. This resemblance possible are all the reasons that so many same-college-graduated so eagerly to tell how ugly I was in my college time.



Kuang Hsu Emperor (光绪皇帝):
My obvious resemblance with Kuang Hsu Emperor has been clearly recorded in a 1996's photo which I used for my first-ever Chinese passport. Another 1982's or 1983's photo, with other four girls from the same junior high school, also showed this obvious resemblance but with a hint of the resemblance to Xianfeng Emperor that made it the reason of being the evidence that "I am so ugly". The resemblance displayed on that magazine's cover page photo is possibly the "so so look" in a lot of telling regarding if I am never a fairy tale beauty. If you noticed that my chin is obviously not a resemble chin, I heard I got my chin from an ancient Mongolian grandmother of mine.






----July 24th, 2019



Related confusion and explanation:

To all who are concerning:
Between 1850-1903, there were two sets of multi-ship groups sending out some treasures from China, I heard all experienced tragedies with theoretically no survival, and I heard some such sunk-ships have been discovered and have research papers published as well. Also, the ship-discovering organization is a Corporate which means it is a non-public stock company., Please verify this information.
1850年-1903年,有两批由多艘船只组成的船队装载财宝由中国通过海运送往外国。我听说,这是很多人在查找的钱财,我赶紧告知我听说的:所有这些船只都遭遇了海难事故,相关的沉船也已经陆续被发现了,也已有了相关的研究论文发表过。也听说了发现沉船的机构是一家非上市股票公司(所发行的股票没有上市交易的股票公司)。请查询这批财宝的人员查实此信息。
----2019年8月3日

My great-grandmother born in 1892 or so in Shanghai of China, her maiden Jurchen Duke family had lived in Shanghai area before 1541. My great-grandfather was (possibly) mothered by a royal daughter of Qing dynasty Emperor Hong Taiji (皇太极) and no other further roral marriage till his own marriage with my great-grandmother in 1911 or so.
我的曾祖母是1892年左右在中国上海出生的,她娘家在1541年之前就已经是是女真贝勒(公爵),也在1541年之前就已经居住在上海地区了。   我曾祖父的祖奶奶可能是清朝皇帝皇太极(1592-1643)的 一个女儿,之后我家就没有和任何清朝皇室后裔联姻,直至我曾祖父于1911年左右和我曾祖母结婚。
----2019年8月3日

To all whose family name is Yu (育) :
  • If you are confused if being affiliated to Manchuria doroi beile Yu (满族旗人育贝勒), please use your family name in Tungusic Jurchen (Manchu) language to differentiate with its Chinese mandarin translation of Yu (育). My great grandmother's maiden family is Jurchen(Manchu) doroi beile Yu. I am sorry I don't my great-grandmother's maiden Jurchen family name but Baylor Yu is a very well-known Jurchen (Manchu) noble to Jurchen (Manchu) nobles.  (--updated on August 2nd, 2019)
  • My great grandmother's maiden family name, the doroi beile Yu's family name, in Tungusic Jurchen (Manchu) language, isWanyanYOYA-NORA (汉文:完颜·优育诺吒或wan'yan优育哪吒). (--updated on July 27th, August 2nd, 2019, 08/16)
  • Clarification:My great grandmother's maiden family name, the Jurchen (Manchu) doroi beile Yu (满族旗人育贝勒), is the Jurchen doroi beile of the WanyanYOYA NORA house(完颜育), not the Qing dynasty doroi beile of Aisin Gioro house(----updated on July 29th, August 2nd, 2019) 
  • Wikipedia: History doroi beile entitlement
  • Wikipedia: The Qing dynasty doroi beile Yu of Aisin Gioro house (清朝的豫亲王 ), this was the Qing dynasty Prince whose then entitlement-residence was sold to Rockefeller Foundation in 1915. (----updated on July 29th, 2019) 
  • Wikipedia: The Qing dynasty doroi beile Yu of Aisin Gioro house (清朝的裕亲王 )
----July 24th, 2019

My promised French name for my "French Financier" newspaper entitlement:
  • My French name: Mademoiselle Le Cé'BonLieaufé YOYA-NORA. (中文:李·奢邦丽艾傲妃·优育诺咤An objective achieved but may not yet perfect French name, a combined name of my family names from my grandmother-side and my father-side (Lieu, Lee, and Fang). --updated on July 27th, 2019) 
  • Updated my French name to Le Cé'BonLieaufé WAYA(â)N-YONOH (汉译:李·奢邦丽艾傲妃·完颜育(汉名:育靓丽)), to reflect the more appropriate family name in French: WAYA(â)N-YONOH (汉译:完颜育)----August 16th, 2019.
----July 24th, 2019


My British Name:Naryshn Wohnmor。 ( 发音:Narsh Womo)。

In Mangolian(蒙古语):
Naran (Sun,太阳) =》Nar;
Hin (Young,年轻)=》hn;
My grandmother's possible first name "Yuush(雅悠诗)" =》ysh;

My Mongolian grandmother is rumored to have given an entitlement family name by her maiden father Kublai Khan: "Ohnmar (Womo),(汉音译:“乌玛(乌莫)”)=》Wohnmar。

The meaning of my British name Naryshn Wohnmor: Young rising sun Yuush Ohnmar (Womo).
我的英国名字的意思是“年轻初阳时候的雅悠诗·乌玛”)

----2019年8月26日。



Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Elements to recognize an opportunity to succeed

Three elements to recognize if it is an opportunity to succeed:
  • Can you understand the frustration expressed during the conversation to identify the possible causes of the frustration?
  • Can you identify if you can offer some help from your knowledge, experiences, and expertise?
  • Can you effectively communicate your expertise to be understood as possible helpful solutions?
----Min Fang, July 10th of 2019

About the famous JPMorgan Chase technology upgrade, the curiosities have been about if I did what I was asked.
  • I was asked to take a look at this bank's technology network as an outsider security specialist.
  • I did find out there is a security gap between securing physical access to money via internet money-transferring, and regular information security provided by the bank's technology department. 
  • I did help out upgrading the bank's security aspect in physical access to money via internet transferring, by establishing a quality mechanism to let physical access security specialists extend their specialty to include securing internet money-transferring access, with the technology department's help.
  • 09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase 
----July 15th, 2019
About 3D movie Avatar, the curiosities have been about why those nonsense talks can be so valuable.
  • I recognized the frustrations expressed were about no available means to achieve the desired camera-images nor the special effects.
  • From my work experiences as a computer program on image processing, I identified all these frustrations can be helped by computerized image handling.
  • I did help out advising how to upgrade image-processing software for digital cameras as well as for digit editing tools.
  • This is the prelude of the customer-order quality technology in the famous JPM Chase technology upgrade. I was a translator between the movie-business and the digital camera manufacturer(s), and a customized-technology camera(s) ordering person in the conversation. (--added 08/07/2019 )
----July 16th, 2019

About Viagra, the curiosities have been about how I can contribute without participating in any lab work.
  • I recognized the frustrations were all about the known medical dilemma that blood vessels in the sponge area don't react according to the regular mechanism for blood pressure adjustment medications.
  • From my research experiences as a computer programmer, I realized this can be helped by re-consider the research hypothesis in order to isolate the area as an independent module.
  • I did help out advising how to develop some isolating hypotheses and related. 
  • The rumored public relation category reward is actually in the intellectual category, for the research facilities' commercial rental savings related.
----July 16th, 2019

About the radio program, the curiosities have been about how I won the deal.
  • I recognized the frustration as a listener that the U.S. radio industry has not much other than music playing. I also recognized the opportunity to save producing costs can be from if the deal can improve the turnover of available resources.
  • I realized an interesting, funny, inspirational and educational radio program to satisfy everyone's curiosity on how to achieve one's own American dream can be great as a popular alternative hotspot hour to iconic kinds of music.
  • I did provide the radio program's producing hypothesis as the following: Based on my life experiences before 2004,  and for the purpose to help the public audience to recognize THE opportunity to achieve success, this radio program would be produced with good story-telling, fun materials and reality practicality, to analyze the key factors of each success story, to introduce related backgrounds and related knowledge tips to the public, and to provide inspirational & informational ideas on how to catch THE opportunity as well.
----July 16th, 2019

About China, the curiosities have been what are my contributions to China's modern economic development.
  • Agriculture development in harsh geographic areas can be based on specially designed greenhouses.
  • Megacities' transportations can be improved via "the objective is being convenient and for the strategic development" in its architecture design.
  • Suzhou city's development can rely on its historic expertise of "manufacturing Shanghai design".
  • The objectives of geographic areas' strategic development can be "a characteristic economy with quality living".
----July 25th, 2019

About China, the curiosities have also been what are my contributions to China's overall.
  • Via the radio program, I introduced, to the world, the Chinese modern history to help the understanding of the Chinese Communist Party who took over the sovereign of China through cruel wars.  
  • Via the 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony, I introduced, to the world, the Chinese cultural history to help the understanding of modern China's characteristic political-economic developments.
----July 25th, 2019


以下摘自:《方家小姐扮作家 - 我方敏的成就究竟是什么?》
我方敏的科技职业成就
  • 2004年6月,我方敏是推动电讯业变革的手机智能化的主要决策关键性推动者之一;(即自2004年6月30日的会议结束,手机智能化已经没有了难以预料的科研难题,其后的变革实践中也没有难以克服的科研瓶颈。----2019年8月11日)
  • 2004年7月-2007年1月,我方敏是推动电脑行业从以发明为主的新兴工业转为有严格质量检测管理标准可以提供来客加工的成熟工业的主要决策关键性推动者之一。(即2007年我离开摩根大通银行后,电脑行业的成熟工业化进程已经没有了难以预料的变革难题,其后的成熟化实践中也没有难以克服的变革瓶颈。----2019年8月11日)
  • 电脑安全系统,我方敏是推动信息传导安全和银行系统安全的主要决策关键性推动者之一。1)自2004年1月以后,信息传导安全不光强调敏感信息必须保密安全,也加强了信息传导通道的保密安全;2)2007年1月以后,网络财经安全不光强调网络信息安全,也加强了网络金融安全。----2019年8月11日

以下中文摘自:07-25-2019 我方敏对中国所做的贡献究竟是什么?
我方敏对中华人民共和国经济发展的贡献是于2004年所做的以下建议
  • 沙漠兴农依大棚,(即“沙漠兴农,依托农业科技特殊大棚”,--2019年8月7日增)
  • 地铁便民依规划,(即“城交城建,强化地铁规划便民新兴”;--2019年8月7日增)
  • 苏州加工依上海,(即“苏州发展,起步加工产业上海设计”,--2019年8月7日增)
  • 地域发展依配套。(即“地域经济,发展特色经济品质生活”。--2019年8月7日增)
我方敏对中华人民共和国文化的贡献是
  • 通过广播剧集,向世界介绍了中国的现代史,让世界理解了当年以战争夺权的中国共产党人;
  • 通过奥运创意,向世界介绍了中国的人文史,让世界理解了如今以特色立足的中国政贸经济。
*政贸经济属人文政治。(--2019年8月7日增)
----2019年7月25日。

Saturday, June 22, 2019

Three meetings in 2007 and related if I inherited confusion

Note:
If anyone curious about what exactly this article means, this someone's curiosity can be helped by asking an own friend in the attorney profession to help out the reading. It truly means my any money is irrelevant with any Rockefeller's any wealth, legally, financially and materially (April 8th, 2019). This is a lengthy article, but please ask your own friend in the attorney profession to read it entirely (April 25th, 2019).

About the famous JPMorgan Chase technology upgrade, the complaints have been about if I did what I was asked.
  • I was asked to take a look at this bank's technology network as an outsider security specialist.
  • I did find out there is a security gap between securing physical access to money via internet money-transferring, and regular information security provided by the bank's technology department. 
  • I did help out upgrading the bank's security aspect in physical access to money via internet transferring, by establishing a quality mechanism to let physical access security specialists extend their specialty to include securing internet money-transferring access, with the technology department's help.
  • 09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPMChase 
----July 15th, 2019

Widely shared negativizes about me is how I dis-appreciated the gentlemen from 2003's Hyatt Regional Hotel's reception lobby, especially after I got the deal of the radio program that helped me to be handsomely financially independent (June 21st, 2019). Actually, it is not appropriate to imply so after the broadcasting of the story featuring his friend's presence upon his wife's request on that very next day at the bar of the same Hyatt Regional. Also, the radio program deal was my successful hard-sale which was 100 % totally, completely and factually based on a very shrewd market segment analysis of the radio industry(June 21st, 2019). and the true reason how I got that radio program can only be best described as similar to the famous IKEA model from Harvard Business Case. It landed my radio program a leading National broadcasting channel, a best broadcasting window and a rebroadcasting window, unlimited free & full access to a fully equipped recording studio, a ready producing team, a ready promotion team, and ready supporting resources fully provided free by the Radio company. All in July 1st of 2004's meeting-record. (June 22nd, 2019).
Reference of chronicle complaints about Rockefeller(s): Chronicles updates of events

Three meetings in 2007 and related confusion

It seems that the big name R has a shared family habit to announce their own speculation as if an authoritative statement is THE reason for a lot of my troubles. I heard they "have been announcing" that I don't have inheritance since 2005, which has been almost the exact same way they have been kept announcing on the radio since 2014, as you heard from, all those official public statements from the big authority R houses about everybody else's all private matters, the only difference is those since-2005-announcements are not addressed to the public audience so that my inheriting related knowing-groups never even heard of it. This is the reason for why I have been complaining that it seems nobody needs to listen to my anybody's saying regarding if I have inherited my birth grandfathers' money no matter how credible this my anybody might be, which insulted a lot of people who have tried to explain the confusion as well as kept me screaming this entire time.

I say it aloud again: My inheriting has my own inheritable and own inheriting administrative attorneys that absolutely & completely independent from any R's family wealth. My Trust-inheriting is irrelevant to any R's wealth. 
Reference of chronicle complaints about Rockefeller(s): Chronicles updates of events
----April 5th, 2019

Heard 2007's three meetings have been reasons for a lot of confusions. I heard there were three meetings in 2007 (January, June, and July respectively) intended to address some confusion regarding 2004's three meetings but resulted in broadcasting original confusion only.

June of 2007's meeting, I heard it was all about confusion if my 2004's inhering can be valid:

1: How can an inheriting without any identification verification?
  • My inheriting day was June 30th of 2004, my inheriting related identification verification was January of 2004, I was not asked to present my photo identification was because I was presented with the attorney in my U.S. resident immigration application attorney's office where all my identification (photo ID and legal documentation) were in records.
2: How can anyone inherit a company when being objected at the inheriting moment already?
  • On June 30th of 2004, I was being objected the eligibility to inherit several U.S. companies, but my 2004's inheriting on June 30th of 2004 was actually Trust-Inheriting which should not involve any specific business investment company so that those objections in 2004 to against me inheriting those companies were irrelevant to my Trust-Inheriting. 
  • All those companies, who expressed objection on June 30th of 2004 as mentioned above, have never been owned by any Rockefeller name, nor any Ford name, nor any Walton name. ( reference link of how to verify a company's lawful ownership --updated on 04-03-2019)
  • It is rumored there were other inheriting events on the same day of June 30th of 2004 as well. All were irrelevant events because each had a different wealth to be inherited and each had different inheriting administrative attorneys groups. Family inheriting normally administered by attorneys who are known to inheriting families. (--updated on 04-03-2019)
  • How to tell it is irrelevant or not-inheriting? The paid-out is gifting or Trust-annuity payment is different on money recipient's income tax type and income tax rate. Gifting is gift tax, Trust-annuity payment can be either ( Form 1040) yearly income tax or based on each annuity payment's investor tax. I am qualified for investor tax. (01/11/2020)
  • How to tell Trust-inheriting validly inherited the Trust's investment chain? Same to all investors who bought stock shares from all public-traded corporations that have each's own downstream corporation-investment-adventures. 2004's rejections were from those equivalent to corporation-investment adventures, Trust I inherited is equivalent to a stock-owner of a public-traded corporation,. (01/11/2020) 
2-1: The anger if I am the reason for those confused families lost their "confused family wealth"? (--updated on 04-09-2019)
  • The efforts have been on clarifying that, according to company registration historical records and commercial registration laws, those objecting companies are not part of the wealth of those confused families, which means those confused families historically never own those companies so that they never lost their "confused family wealth".
  • The efforts have been on clarifying that, according to Trust laws, Trusted wealth is beneficiary owned wealth since the date of the establishment of the Trust, which means a company-ownership confusion is not the reason for anyone to "take over" such already owned Trusted wealth, which is also according to Trust laws.
  • The efforts have been on clarifying that, those confused families did not lose any of their family wealth because of my birth nor because of my Trust-inheriting.
  • All these companies have never been owned by Rockefeller holdings, nor any individual Rockefeller, nor any individual Rockefeller's any marriage partner(s). ----August 12th, 2019
3: How can anyone inherit without public known inheritable nor public-known inheriting attorneys?
  • My 2004's inheriting was a sole beneficiary person's Trust-Inheriting, my inheritable was some Trusts set up by some of my birth Chinese grandfathers, so no reading needed.
  • My Inheriting attorneys are those Trusts' entrusting attorneys who have no reason to be known to the public because of the nature that my Trust-Inheriting is a private inheriting event. 
  • My financial providing have been paid-out on time as decided schedule already presented to the public that my 2004's private Trust-inheriting was a valid inheriting event.   
  • It is announced that I am eligible to pay investor income tax rate for all these paid-outs(06/26/2019).  
4: How can an inheriting be valid without signing at least one legal document?
  • Due to the private nature of inheriting, a signature is not the deciding factor in validating wealth inheriting after financial wealth's lawful ownership is already lawfully factually validly transferred. 
  • I entrusted my newly inherited wealth to June 30th of 2004's same entrusting attorneys' groups. I expressed my willingness to entrust my newly inherited Trusts on the same inheriting day which was June 30th of 2004.
  • My financial providing have been paid-out on time as decided schedule already presented to the public that my 2004's private Trust-inheriting was a valid inheriting event.    
July of 2007's meeting:

My-side personal status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I was 37 years old in 2004 who newly inherited some handsome Trusts-wealth that a family with an heir, some children, and a marriage partner(s) naturally became such a concentration in my life, but I was in a biologically exhausted health situation that sexually involved romance was not appealing at all. So, I participated in that discussion for the reason to have children in a (polygamist or not) marriage with one (or more) marriage partner(s) who did not have any biological offspring yet in 2004. To me being a polygamist, a man who already a biological child means a leftover male who is old and undesirable in considering seriously involved romance.

The reason for the comprised prenup became fundamental for that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion
Not willing to let any part of the own-wealth to be in risk of the possible taken-over was from all participants of that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion.

What I think what might have happened after that marriage discussion?
I don't have a clue about what might have happened after July 1st of 2004, but I am positive, which means not assertive, that I may have biological and legitimate children from definitely a factually virgin-father man that, in 2004, I was willing to be involved in marriage. The not-assertive is about if I do have a biological child or children but I don't think that is any public interest but my own private matter.

Do I positively look forward to reuniting with my biological children and the marriage partner?
That depends on if that is a marriage partner who only shares biological children with me and still in the marriage with his heart. To me, marriage means a willingness-based responsibility, relationship, and exclusive inside-marriage sex (when I am healthy enough).

How long it takes for me to be healthy from my current health situation?
I have already asked law enforcement's help to free me from possible sexual harassments of any party that intended to maim my biological nature appearance, to compromise my health, to take over my wealth, to replace me from my possible marriage, or to destroy my way of living my life.

----March 16th, 2019

My understanding of all those financial confusions:
If confusions are about if someone's lawfully-owned money, this someone should have no need to commit any crime in order to get this lawful money when laws-help are already available all around,

If the intention is to get not-lawfully-owned money, this someone is also not privileged at all to commit any crime without being prosecuted as well.

----March 17th, 2019

January of 2007's meetingI heard the clarification included:
  • 1: Eligibility for a veteran status is enlisted after a full year.
  • 2: A researching non-staff military strategist only has commanding power when on assignment.
  • 3: U.S. uniform personnel cannot be hostility to the United States nor the banking industry 
References of rumored 2007 hostility technology upgrading
* non-staff means employed but not on the payroll, similar to college's honor professor, sit-in professor for the semester(s), faculty, staff, etc.


I heard anger illustrated in July of 2007's meeting was regarding why the Chinese government tolerated a nobody in the U.S. military's name to insult the Chinese government?
  • I did not attend July of 2007's meeting, I did not attend any of 2007's meetings.
  • The rumored insulting was about what I said regarding the Chinese-Japanese war, and confusion was based on the fact that war was an invasion to China. I was only expressing my understanding about that war from the aspect of war strategy. The talk was never a deny regarding that war was an invasion to China.
  • I am a birth child (possibly an heir) from the famous Chinese Emperors of Tang dynasty was acknowledged since 1989 by a lot of historians from a lot of Chinese colleges.
----April 1st, the next day of March 31st of 2019


Reference of my claimed five years providing paying companies:

I heard the five years paying companies' upstream Trust-investors have been:
  • The first year's settler was Tang dynasty's Emperor Xuanzong(唐玄宗李隆基), at about 1300 years ago. The known heir of the Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong(唐太宗李世民), both featured in those published paintings which were copies from the digital version of those original ancient family portraits.
  • The second year's settler was painter Zhang, Guotao(国画大师张国焘), at about 800 years ago. He was a famous painter in China, one of whose paintings was discovered with the royal collection stamp that cost all his non-heir children been prosecuted by the Emperor of the Song dynasty. I heard this painter's private (royal) collection stamp is identified as the same or characteristically same to the royal collection stamps from the Chinese Tang dynasty and the Chinese Southern Tang dynasty.
  • The third year's settler was Southern Tang dynasty's Emperor Yuanzong (南唐中主唐元宗李璟), and at about 1000 years ago.
  • The fourth and fifth years' settlers were father and son. The father was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wenzong(唐文宗李昂) and the son was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wuzong(唐武宗李瀍), at about 1200 years ago. These two Emperors are historically known heir-grandsons of famous Chinese Tang dynasty's Emperor Taizong and Emperor Xuanzong.
----Jan. 2nd, 2019

Monday, April 1, 2019

Article: Complaints About Rockefellers ( and related )

(03-31-2019 (2): Three meetings in 2007 and related confusion )

All these companies have never been owned by Rockefeller holdings, nor any individual Rockefeller, nor any individual Rockefeller's any marriage partner(s).
----August 12th, 2019

To those who concerned what it means to me if I continually pissing off Rockefellers?
My answers are:
  • I have never on any Rockefeller money or any other financial resources (ref: Note 1),
  • I have never on any Rockefeller's recommendation nor invitation to have my professional or career success (ref: Note 2),
  • I have never on any Rockefeller's charity to be an heir of my own long history Chinese birth family (ref: Note 3),
  • and I am a free person who has never been ruled by any Rockefeller. (ref: Note 4)
Note 1: 《Three meetings in 2007 and related ‘if I inherited’ confusion》
Note 2: 《Elements to recognize an opportunity to succeed》
Note 3: 《The confusion if I am an heir to ancient Chinese Emperors》
Note 4: I have been enjoying my freedom of speech granted by the U.S. Constitution and I will continue doing my frankly talking as I have been.

Min Fang
08/09/2019


A tip: How to verify whose money or who is the investor? One simple way is to verify from "stock certificate number" or the ownership registration record, which is the evidence of lawful investor-ship and lawful ownership of the linked dividend-profit, another way is to verify the signature from a holder of such certificate.

Rockefellers' insist-on claiming ownership of any U.S. money that I am expecting but without presenting such valid certificate nor such valid signature from holder family senior of such certificate has been my huge complaints.
----July 29th, 2019

Note:
If anyone curious about what exactly this article means, this someone's curiosity can be helped by asking an own friend in the attorney profession to help out the reading. It truly means my any money is irrelevant with any Rockefeller's any wealth, legally, financially and materially (April 8th, 2019). This is a lengthy article, but please ask your own friend in the attorney profession to read it entirely (April 25th, 2019).

Chronicle updates:
国内一些误解是关于我们一家是否“家传痴傻”,可能是出于丁姓私人助理一家的亲生经历。他们对我们家的立场似乎是见钱就拿,见东西就搬,把我爷爷奶奶家都搬空了,一家三个孩子两个大人都是很不在乎还继续欢迎他们一家上门做客,把我爷爷去世时留下的一共六万余元银行存款拿了一半左右,而三个孩子都还是他们一家很好的朋友。我方敏对此的说明:我曾祖父的突然去世对当时很年轻的我爷爷影响很大,所以,包括我父亲在内的四个孩子,都是在7岁生日那天就已经拿到了我爷爷所给予所分配的家产(家里传统:女孩70多万,男孩一百五十万)。在物价便宜的1950年前后,四个孩子每人每年1%的利息就是七千元或上万元,超越我爷爷奶奶留给他们自己的每年生活费用及家里的全部家当,这才是当时在上海生活的三个孩子及我的爷爷奶奶毫不在意的主要原因。另一个原因可能是:丁姓私人助理是和我爷爷奶奶同岁的,而丁家太太是我爷爷一个同龄社交女友的唯一孩子。----2019年7月20日。

I was blamed for picking up on O'Connor name to have my own-wealth fight. This has been a misunderstanding. I misunderstood my Trust-inheriting as three companies inheriting was the reason for such confusion. The situation in 2016 was: I was aware one of such companies did send out $500Million as I requested in 2004 but somehow I could not receive it,  and I was relentlessly trying to contact another such company's accounting representative to inquire my inheriting. So, it is most appropriate to say that I was triggered to have anxiety over the O'Connor name by if they invested confusion during the period of time when I can't get an answer for my inheriting-inquiry. ----July 20th, 2019

中国的文革期间,“当街杀人,随后抄家”,是被作为过国家英雄奖励的;现在的中国政府国家宣传似乎也是,“如果能够为钱杀人,是在响应中国政府号召,是在全世界范围内实现中国的共产主义,是应该被中国政府当作国家英雄的。”我方敏本人再加上一条投诉,为何中国政府的宣传是表达“在私人住宅的私用厕所里安装摄像机镜头并通过卫星播放女人在自家厕所洗澡画面,是应该被认为是中国共产主义行为的实现”?----2019年7月8日。

How I got the radio program can be best described as similar to the Harvard Business Case's famous IKEA model. I landed a leading National broadcasting channel, the best broadcasting and a rebroadcasting window, free & full access to a fully equipped recording studio,  a ready producing, a ready supporting team and a ready promotion team provided free by the Rado company ----June 22nd, 2019

Widely shared negativeness about me in the entertainment industry is how I disappreciated the gentlemen from 2003's Hyatt Regional Hotel's reception lobby, especially after I got the deal of the radio program that helped me to be handsomely financially independent. It was well known that so many entertainment industry's personnel had turned-off on me after only $7Million in total for the radio program's possible investment was announced. I have to say I truly appreciate Mr. Hyatt's gentleman's kindness, and I am sorry that I failed such public expectation in expressing my appreciation. The different understanding between me and the entertainment industry was caused by what happened after that only $7Million in total possible investment was announced. That radio program deal was my successful hard-sale which was 100 % totally, completely and factually based on a very shrewd market segment analysis of the radio industry. This radio program deal was the deal made me the famous "a salesperson" entitlement inside the salesperson profession. All these were in the original meeting record of July 1st of 2004, all have been acknowledged by the radio company, and all have been protected by the United States laws. ----June 21st, 2019

以我2004年7月1日以成功的大规模创造投资就业机会而成名之前的生活经历,及我对生活中很多事物的想法和感悟为主线,介绍我得以成功的原因,基础和机遇,并扩充基本知识和背景常识的介绍,同时兼顾趣味性,生活感和故事性。Radio program's hypothesis: Based on the huge success of how I can massively create investment and employment opportunities on June 30th and July 1st of 2004, based on my life experiences before July 1st of 2004 as well as my understanding and thoughts about everything or anything in my life,  to introduce what it takes to succeed, to introduce possible reasons, backgrounds and opportunities of my each successful creation of some investment and employment opportunities, to introduce related background information and background specialty knowledge that is useful in everyone;s daily life and helpful for succeeders to recognize and catch THE opportunity, etc,, with good story-telling, fun materials, and reality practicality.
----2019年6月11日, from https://somebodyinma.blogspot.com/

A Mr. David Rockefeller from the 2003 Hyatt Regional, not the bar person from the same the 2003 Hyatt Regional, needs to realize the bar person is at least a day possible to confuse anyone about if forgot Rockefellers' family education of "No Fucking, No money" so famously published already. So I say to this Mr. David Rockefeller of the 2003 Hyatt Regional, please stop confusing anyone if my money can be possibly associate with your sexuality after your marriage family's friendly bar person's story had been so loudly broadcasted. ----June 12th, 2019


It is very annoying when family-seniors don't educate youngers enough about how to know what is the family wealth. The good example of "so annoying" is Rockefellers' younger generation insisting on stating I dared to claim those five companies in this blog article has to mean the intention of taking over their family wealth, which can be proved to be so absurd because all these companies never paid ESTATE TAX for any of their seniors.-Some said my tone is very annoying as well, as if I am not their own generation but their uncles', I say why would it matter at all after all those "no association" announcements, but I can imagine my parents finally can breathe some easiness about educatable.---June 9th, 2019.

Heard the best way to know what is going on is to check out any edition of any author's <Trust law Textbook> from any law school for chapters on beneficiary's possible situation and how Trust laws have been evolved in order to protect effectively, which are the explanation of what has been going on word-by-word. 想了解什么是信托及信托法,最好的办法就是读一读法学院的《信托法教材》,想知道我的故事究竟是怎么回事,就读一读《信托法教材》里的有关“受益人的可能处境及原因分析”和信托法是如何演变的历史。据说我和我父母的经历就是《信托法教材》里每字每句的描述及说明为何《信托法》必须如此这般制定才可以有效保护。----May 28th, 2019

华裔社区这种负面言论比较多,一个原因是因为我所有的那些由奖励公司已经发放的智慧专利都没有收到过(其中绝大部分安全,但有一些已被提领了超过10年),另一个可能原因就是这些专利收入被一些人提领了之后所故意制造的负面言论以企图将我的领款者身份彻底换掉的(智慧专利一般是分期五十年付款的)。目前,我认为我所面临的负面情绪负面言论主要来自三大块:1:那些过去十多年已经提领了我的智慧专利收入的一些人;2:当年(1967年7月至1996年10月)拿到每月一万美金中的一部分的一些人;3:想要提领我的信托所支付给我和我父母三人的生活费用的一些人。----原稿于2019年5月21日,5月24日修改。

中国自己制定的继承法就是中国文化中国传统里面有关继承的道理,中国人民台湾人民依据中国传统地方特色与时俱进所制定的中国法律台湾法律就是依据中国文化传统的中国道理,信托继承在台湾在中国大陆在欧洲在亚洲,都和我在美国的信托继承是一样的法律。----May 12th, 2019

抗争法律权益?发动群众运动?改变社会制度? ---- May 10th, 2019

“只有没有现钱在手上,就不能说是谋财害命”的说法:
我方敏是从未参军且1996年离开中国后就一直居住国外的,我父亲方文海1956年就已经被中国的军事法庭裁决为开除军籍后就离开了中国人民解放军,谁是中国人民解放军的现役军人属于中国军法管辖范围?我方敏现在公开表态不愿意我本人被中国政府通过军事协作而谋杀,不愿意我父母方文海王博贤被谋杀,并且愿意看着司法执法机关可以公平的捍卫受害人利益。我方敏公开指控中国国家主席国家军委主席习近平篡党夺权,完全无视中国人民解放军是由中国宪法所规定的中国共产党领导下的军队,将中国人民解放军作为其私人武装力量,滥用职权协助卖淫,抢劫和谋财害命等中国法律所界定的刑事犯罪行为。参阅:03-24-2019 南京方面的矛盾(22)---- 被开除军籍的处罚?我父亲方文海的中国陆军勘探兵坚强 )
----2019年5月8日。

有关预留分继承(legitimate, legitimate portion):
05-03-2019 (I) “至少应该有这么多“说法的起源 
05-03-2019 (II) 究竟什么是预留分继承?
----May 4th, 2019

My 2004 inheriting was Trust-Inheriting which does not have any legitime portion (legitima portio).

爷爷为我设立信托是1948年以中华民国公民的身份在英国租界地的香港设立的,爷爷是在1965年才以中华人民共和国公民身份在上海去世的,我本人是2004年以中华人民共和国公民身份在美国继承该信托,我爷爷子女在1965年已经分家产继承了我爷爷方智仁的遗产,我爷爷子女的1965年分家产遗产继承及我本人2004年的信托继承都不涉及台湾的继承法。(04-29-2019 信托继承是没有预留分的,即使按照台湾法律,信托继承都是遗嘱完全有效的继承。
----April 29th, 2019

Please don't be overly concerned if you heard the President of the U.S, U.S. Foreign Department, and U.S. Treasury Department have all announced negatively about if I could possibly have any money to be called lawfully private wealth.  It may be just some confusion caused by arguments of "What exactly is the difference between the legal and other administrative components of a government?" to be announced as strong evidence of NO MONEY.

What about the Chinese government's announcement of "China doesn't need your type of talent"? I agree to the saying that it is hard to know unless it can be cleared from the U.S. about what is my type of talent that was told to China.
----April 28nd, 2019

If you heard confusing announcements about money matters as well as ridiculous romance matters,  please read this article with the help provided by your friend who is in the attorney profession, and to address your confusion regarding such announcements to this attorney friend of yours.

Example: confusion caused by arguments of "what exactly is the definition of an investor" or "what exactly can be covered by a medical insurance plan" to be announced as strong evidence of NO MONEY.
----April 22nd, 2019

信托投资是通过财务经理所管理的投资组合,自己拿钱出来投资办厂开公司是属于自己直接管理的投资。洛克菲勒家族是带着钱从奥地利或者德国来美国投资的,洛克菲勒家族是因为投资Standard Oil 石油公司发了家,福特家族是从英国或者爱尔兰带着钱来美国的,福特家族是因为投资福特汽车公司发了家。如果“1941年的四十万美金”传言中的方智祥他们家当时带了这笔四十万美金来美国投资,就属于是这种情况了,也就是看他们当时投资的公司有没有发财了。我在美国的投资都是通过我所继承的信托进行投资和投资组合的,不是我自己直接带着钱来美国然后自己直接拿钱出来投资的,而他们都是自己带钱来美国自己直接进行投资的,所以,我一直说我所继承的钱及我的信托在美国的投资,与洛克菲勒家的钱以及福特家族的钱是完全不搭界的也没有任何关系的。----2019年4月21日

In 2017-2019, I have complained to the law enforcing agencies that Rockefeller name has sexually harassed me through the public channel media and through glasshouse cancer treatment-related medical facilities, I have complained to the law enforcing agencies that Rockefeller name has taken my radio company's major featured person fee of $3Billion - $4Billion entirely (avg $26Million - $35Million per month for 10 years). ----April 17th, 2019

The company's ownership confusion can be illustrated as: The Federal Commerce Department has instructed the Commerce Department Boston office to write payment-check for my living expenses because I am a Bostonian who has inherited a Trust that has some business dealing with the Federal Commerce Department, the ownership confused families thought they have owned the Commerce Department Boston office already and entirely because of their generationally close work relationship, while the Commerce Department Boston office speak-person kept explaining the paying-instruction was from the federal but the entire commerce department is not the payer of my living expenses. This is the same reason that my Trust's entrusting attorneys were very quiet when I was vertically multiplying objected by the entire Commerce Department Office line for the ridiculousness of my eligibility to inherit the Commerce Department Boston office on July 1st of 2004. And it is the same reason that the ownership of the Commerce Department Boston office can't be "picked up" by just writing it on any inheriting list, even if that inheriting list is affiliated to the famous rich Rockefellers. ----April 16th, 2019

I also heard a Rockefeller has illegally "announced" on the radio their own desire to spend my money on the radio in 2007's broadcasting. ----April 13th, 2019

可能也和2007年三次会议有关的 “04-12-2019 恐怖啊,以逼婚实施勒索的尝试”----April 12th, 2019

Reference of my claimed five years providing paying companies are listed at the bottom of this article. ----April 11th, 2019

I heard my big trouble with Rockefeller name started since July 1st of 2004 but not because of my huge several billion U.S. dollars inheriting-day spending. I heard it was because a Rockefeller's name affiliated somebody has "inherited" that publicly famous "O'Connor's confusion company" almost immediately after O'Connors, as well as that American company's six upstream investor-companies, objected "my inheriting" in ceremonially monotonous style. I heard the reason for Rockefeller's-affiliated "inheriting" is "it is just a picking up" but Rockefellers' insisting on to validate such ownership, according to a forged inheriting-list, have made it not funny at all.
*This American company has a famous "French Financier" investor-company. (updated on April 14th)
*This American company's current size is about $400Billion. (updated on 04/16/2019).
*I have complained to the law enforcing agency demanding clarification about O'Connor's confusion, and I heard O'Connor name did the same, I have changed my inherited-it-saying after I heard the clarification that this American company has been lawfully owned fully by its British Investor company for over 400 years. (updated on 04/17/2019).

I heard another big trouble with Rockefeller name was a 2007's radio broadcasting which announced my first year's American paying company is a "Rockefeller's taking over". This is the company has the rumored my birth children's inheritable story but such story never has rumored any child "supposedly" from the announced "taking-over" Rockefeller. I heard this taking-over announcement has some foreign department's stubborn associations is the reason for all those headaches to everyone who has not heard such a 2007's announcement.
*This American company has a Portugal investor company.  (updated on April 14th)
*This American company's current size is about $400Billion as well. (updated on 04/16/2019).

I heard two other big troubles with Rockefeller name were both because of their in-law affiliation. One is my third year's paying American company, one is my fourth year's paying American company, which have added rumored Rockefellers' "taking over" four out of my five years' living expenses providing. The fifth year's paying American company is rumored "taken over" by a Russian name, I have not heard rumors about how this Russian name affiliated with the money, this rumored Russian name has never been affiliated with me. This is not funny at all when I am penniless.
*One of these two American companies is an investor-company of NYC's Javits center,  the other one has been Lehman Brother's investor-company. (updated on April 14th)
*These two American companies' current sizes are about $400Billion each. (updated on 04/16/2019).

----April 10th, 2019

Added item "2-1: The anger if I am the reason for those confused families lost their "confused family wealth"? " on 04-09-2019.


Three meetings in 2007 and related confusion

It seems that the big name R has a shared family habit to announce their own speculation as if an authoritative statement is THE reason for a lot of my troubles. I heard they "have been announcing" that I don't have inheritance since 2005, which has been almost the exact same way they have been kept announcing on the radio since 2014, as you heard from, all those official public statements from the big authority R houses about everybody else's all private matters, the only difference is those since-2005-announcements are not addressed to the public audience so that my inheriting related knowing-groups never even heard of it. This is the reason for why I have been complaining that it seems nobody needs to listen to my anybody's saying regarding if I have inherited my birth grandfathers' money no matter how credible this my anybody might be, which insulted a lot of people who have tried to explain the confusion as well as kept me screaming this entire time.

I say it aloud again: My inheriting has my own inheritable and own inheriting administrative attorneys that absolutely & completely independent from any R's family wealth. My Trust-inheriting is irrelevant to any R's wealth. 

----April 5th, 2019

Heard 2007's three meetings have been reasons for a lot of confusions. I heard there were three meetings in 2007 (January, June, and July respectively) intended to address some confusion regarding 2004's three meetings but resulted in broadcasting original confusion only.

June of 2007's meeting, I heard it was all about confusion if my 2004's inhering can be valid:

1: How can an inheriting without any identification verification?
  • My inheriting day was June 30th of 2004, my inheriting related identification verification was January of 2004, I was not asked to present my photo identification was because I was presented with the attorney in my U.S. resident immigration application attorney's office where all my identification (photo ID and legal documentation) were in records.
2: How can anyone inherit a company when being objected at the inheriting moment already?
  • On June 30th of 2004, I was being objected the eligibility to inherit several U.S. companies, but my 2004's inheriting on June 30th of 2004 was actually Trust-Inheriting which should not involve any specific business investment company so that those objections in 2004 to against me inheriting those companies were irrelevant to my Trust-Inheriting. 
  • All those companies, who expressed objection on June 30th of 2004 as mentioned above, have never been owned by any Rockefeller name, nor any Ford name, nor any Walton name. ( reference link of how to verify a company's lawful ownership --updated on 04-03-2019)
  • It is rumored there were other inheriting events on the same day of June 30th of 2004 as well. All were irrelevant events because each had different wealth to be inherited and each had different inheriting administrative attorneys groups. Family inheriting normally administered by attorneys who are known to inheriting families. (--updated on 04-03-2019)
2-1: The anger if I am the reason for those confused families lost their "confused family wealth"? (--updated on 04-09-2019)
  • The efforts have been on clarifying that, according to company registration historical records and commercial registration laws, those objecting companies are not part of the wealth of those confused families, which means those confused families historically never own those companies so that they never lost their "confused family wealth".
  • The efforts have been on clarifying that, according to Trust laws, Trusted wealth is beneficiary owned wealth since the date of the establishment of the Trust, which means a company-ownership confusion is not the reason for anyone to "take over" such already owned Trusted wealth, which is also according to Trust laws.
  • The efforts have been on clarifying that, those confused families did not lose any of their family wealth because of my birth nor because of my Trust-inheriting.
3: How can anyone inherit without public known inheritable nor public-known inheriting attorneys?
  • My 2004's inheriting was a sole beneficiary person's Trust-Inheriting, my inheritable was some Trusts set up by some of my birth Chinese grandfathers, so no reading needed.
  • My Inheriting attorneys are those Trusts' entrusting attorneys who have no reason to be known to the public because of the nature that my Trust-Inheriting is a private inheriting event. 
  • My financial providing have been paid-out on time as decided schedule already presented to the public that my 2004's private Trust-inheriting was a valid inheriting event.    
4: How can an inheriting be valid without signing at least one legal document?
  • Due to the private nature of inheriting, a signature is not the deciding factor in validating wealth inheriting after financial wealth's lawful ownership is already lawfully factually validly transferred. 
  • I entrusted my newly inherited wealth to June 30th of 2004's same entrusting attorneys' groups. I expressed my willingness to entrust my newly inherited Trusts on the same inheriting day which was June 30th of 2004.
  • My financial providing have been paid-out on time as decided schedule already presented to the public that my 2004's private Trust-inheriting was a valid inheriting event.    
July of 2007's meeting:

My-side personal status prelude for that famous marriage discussion on July 1st of 2004:
I was 37 years old in 2004 who newly inherited some handsome Trusts-wealth that a family with an heir, some children, and a marriage partner(s) naturally became such a concentration in my life, but I was in a biologically exhausted health situation that sexually involved romance was not appealing at all. So, I participated in that discussion for the reason to have children in a (polygamist or not) marriage with one (or more) marriage partner(s) who did not have any biological offspring yet in 2004. To me being a polygamist, a man who already a biological child means a leftover male who is old and undesirable in considering seriously involved romance.

The reason for the comprised prenup became fundamental for that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion
Not willing to let any part of the own-wealth to be in risk of the possible taken-over was from all participants of that famous 07-01-2004 marriage discussion.

What I think what might have happened after that marriage discussion?
I don't have a clue about what might have happened after July 1st of 2004, but I am positive, which means not assertive, that I may have biological and legitimate children from definitely a factually virgin-father man that, in 2004, I was willing to be involved in marriage. The not-assertive is about if I do have a biological child or children but I don't think that is any public interest but my own private matter.

Do I positively look forward to reuniting with my biological children and the marriage partner?
That depends on if that is a marriage partner who only shares biological children with me and still in the marriage with his heart. To me, marriage means a willingness-based responsibility, relationship, and exclusive inside-marriage sex (when I am healthy enough).

How long it takes for me to be healthy from my current health situation?
I have already asked law enforcement's help to free me from possible sexual harassments of any party that intended to maim my biological nature appearance, to compromise my health, to take over my wealth, to replace me from my possible marriage, or to destroy my way of living my life.

----March 16th, 2019

My understanding of all those financial confusions:
If confusions are about if someone's lawfully-owned money, this someone should have no need to commit any crime in order to get this lawful money when laws-help are already available all around,

If the intention is to get not-lawfully-owned money, this someone is also not privileged at all to commit any crime without being prosecuted as well.

----March 17th, 2019

January of 2007's meetingI heard the clarification included:
  • 1: Eligibility for a veteran status is enlisted after a full year.
  • 2: A researching non-staff military strategist only has commanding power when on assignment.
  • 3: U.S. uniform personnel cannot be hostility to the United States nor the banking industry 
References of rumored 2007 hostility technology upgrading
* non-staff means employed but not on the payroll, similar to college's honor professor, sit-in professor for the semester(s), faculty, staff, etc.


I heard anger illustrated in July of 2007's meeting was regarding why the Chinese government tolerated a nobody in the U.S. military's name to insult the Chinese government?
  • I did not attend July of 2007's meeting, I did not attend any of 2007's meetings.
  • The rumored insulting was about what I said regarding the Chinese-Japanese war, and confusion was based on the fact that war was an invasion to China. I was only expressing my understanding about that war from the aspect of war strategy. The talk was never a deny regarding that war was an invasion to China.
  • I am a birth child (possibly an heir) from the famous Chinese Emperors of Tang dynasty was acknowledged since 1989 by a lot of historians from a lot of Chinese colleges.
----April 1st, the next day of March 31st of 2019


Reference of my claimed five years providing paying companies:

I heard the five years paying companies' upstream Trust-investors have been:
  • The first year's settler was Tang dynasty's Emperor Xuanzong(唐玄宗李隆基), at about 1300 years ago. The known heir of the Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong(唐太宗李世民), both featured in those published paintings which were copies from the digital version of those original ancient family portraits.
  • The second year's settler was painter Zhang, Guotao(国画大师张国焘), at about 800 years ago. He was a famous painter in China, one of whose paintings was discovered with the royal collection stamp that cost all his non-heir children been prosecuted by the Emperor of the Song dynasty. I heard this painter's private (royal) collection stamp is identified as the same or characteristically same to the royal collection stamps from the Chinese Tang dynasty and the Chinese Southern Tang dynasty.
  • The third year's settler was Southern Tang dynasty's Emperor Yuanzong (南唐中主唐元宗李璟), and at about 1000 years ago.
  • The fourth and fifth years' settlers were father and son. The father was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wenzong(唐文宗李昂) and the son was Tang dynasty's Emperor Wuzong(唐武宗李瀍), at about 1200 years ago. These two Emperors are historically known heir-grandsons of famous Chinese Tang dynasty's Emperor Taizong and Emperor Xuanzong.
----Jan. 2nd, 2019