- ①check participating local medical centers, and commercial sponsorship information if needed, from your health department colleagues,
- ②make appointments to the preferred medical center, special attention: sameday appoinntments are available now already since this April in Europe, Asia, Canada, USA.
- From his Russian royal birth certificate, the boy's name was Alexander Ohnmor, his birth mother was Therese Petrovna Oldenburg Romanovsky, the boy Alexander Onhmor's birth father was Prince George of Russia. The boy born in 1894 was my great-grandfather who had a Chinese name 方蓠其, his birthmother (Russian Mistress) also had a Chinese maiden grandfather 蔚先, a Chinese maiden father 蔚前 and herself a Chinese name 蔚蓉, who was also known for her cat-yellow eyes and Asian smooth skin to both her maiden family-inlaws and those in Russian Prince Estate in Shanghai. I have inherited Ohnmor name in 2004 from my ancient Mongol grandmother Yuelun Ohnmor (m. in 1260AD, Kublai Khan's daughter), her husband used Fone(方)as his surname which has been my family name, me and my father have used "Fang" as "方" translation, the same Fone grandfathers were all a heir-grandson to Chinese Emperor Li, Shimin (唐太宗李世民) that I claimed I am a heir-girl of since 2004.
- You company should have a company registration license that clearly listed your ownership that I have nothing to do with.
- I am the birthmark beneficiary of some ancient Trusts, any confusion regarding any investing- company's ownership is historically known to every related confused party, which should be nothing new, not beneficiary person particular, and not related to who beneficiary person is.
- 10/27/2020
“已有六百年的投资历史是从未易手的”究竟是什么意思?
这些美国加拿大的著名超级富豪的祖先都是在1650年前后来到美洲大陆的,当时一同登上美洲大陆的是堂兄弟,而这几个兄弟的共同爷爷是一个1450-1550年前后的一个爷爷,这样,这家姓氏的所有美国加拿大富豪都是这同一个爷爷的后裔孩子,而美国司法部所核实的“这家指示付款的美国公司已有六百年从未易手的投资历史”的意思是这些富豪共同的一个爷爷及这个爷爷的所有后裔都从未持有这家美国公司的投资,而且美国这几家富豪都是如此类似情况,所以这家指示付款的美国公司是从未被洛柯菲勒家福特家和沃顿家所持有的公司。(08/29/2020)
为什么那些四亿美金不可能源自美国洛富豪的家族财产或者中国国内任何公司政府机关的公款?
我的解释:据说是依据美国司法部的调查。美国这边报道的是,根据美国司法部的调查,每一个四亿美金付款(共五个)的私人投资者都是一个在六百年前已经购买了美国的四亿美金付款公司的某个六百年前已经成立的非中国地区的投资者公司的股份,而且这个六百年前的非中国地区私人投资者的世代后裔在至今已经长达六百年的时间里从未易手这份投资。所以,每笔四亿美金(共五笔)的付款都不可能是美国洛富豪的家族财产或者中华人民共和国的国内任何公司及政府机关的公款。(11/03/2020)
Relationship between Trust, Investment, Wealth, Beneficiary |
About curiosity regarding exactly whose wealth I have been claiming all these years?
- I have been claiming my own Missy Fone's wealth!
- It is very easy to verify if all those five years' providing Trusts I have claimed have been my Missy Fone's (Missy Lee's) wealth since 2004.
- Family name changed from Lee (李) to Fone(方) around 1100AD (--06/13/2020).
Fang is the People's republic of China's standard translation for 方,by my family use Fone since Kublai Khan's daughter Yunelun Ohnmor's husband Lin Fone who is one of my birthmark ancestors, his wife Yuelun Ohnmor has been verifed by US Justice Department as my birth grandmother ancestor, Yuelun's son is my next generation birthmark grandfather ancestor.
So, I am Missy Fone and I have been claiming my own Missy Fone wealth. It is very easy to verify if all those five years' providing Trusts I have claimed have been my Missy Fone's (Missy Lee's) wealth since 2004.
----April 22, 2020.
Basic Medical System are the full set of pre-quisite courses for clinical medicine major's specialty courses, so, no certificate after finishing all BMS courses but has valid transcript as the evidences of the qualification for futher specialty medicine major courses. I took all these courses, as part of the 1985 admission's pharmacology major class, with medicine major students in the sanme classroom, by same professors, in the same lab, and taking same exams.
- *Specialty clinical medicine courses are generic surgery, specialty surgery, pediatrics, Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology(OB/GYN), etc,
- * Pandemic-medicine school has its own medical related prequisites, but not the Basic Medical System and not provided by the clinical medicine school .
- In Shanghai Medical University, pharmacy major's medical prequisite are provided by Pandemic-medicine school.
About concerns over COVID-19:
I also believe in drinking half a cup of 10% saline water to do the full body cleanse if needed, but I strictly follow what my body desires that I will drink the full half cup only if I felt it is so delicious, which definitely means my body needs such cleanse (a bit or a quarter cup more if too delicious, and may be another half cup after five hours if still felt so delicious), and I will put on an extra layer to comfort my body when it turns to a slow mechanism to do the body-cleansing job. *Concerns are all about the cardio system and blood pressure. **10% saline water does mean 1 portion salt with 9 portion water. YOu can try to put some of this 10% saline water for your family beloved pet, see if they feel it delicious as well, please besure to have their water bowl fully filled.
----April 15th, 2020
Like a lot of kitchen people believe in baking soda, I totally believe in salt. I use ancient wound-cleanse antibacteria effective saline water (5% salt in distilled water or warm boiled water, 2 tsp per quarter), to clean my kitchen, spray on grocery shopping bags, and do grocery preparing-wash. And I even bought a salt-inhaler (a asthma-patient-usage nebulizer, or a Mini Humidifier) so I can inhale some (5% saline salt-water fog) into my breathing system if necessary (*"No food or drink rule" applies for 30 minutes after each inhale-cleanse application of nebulizer treatment). ----March 21st, 2020
1:The confusion if my 2004's Trust-inheriting can be valid.
- Related clarifications are in the numeric section “June of 2007's meeting” of <Three meetings in 2007 and related if I inherited confusion>, just scroll down to that numeric section.
- It is best to ask your own private friend who is in the attorney profession to read it as well.
- ---- January 11th, 2020
My answer: What I heard is: $400Million and related other payments for each of these five years I published has been verified as lawful money source, lawful given, and lawful investor tax rate. The third year's providing-Trust I published has been verified as birthmark Trust-inheriting Trust. The third year means fiscal year started on October 1 of 2016.
The current confusion is if my current medical payment has been from this published five years, and if lawful if not one of the published five. This confusion has caused a lot of employes of FBI agency and of Federal Justice department from Cinese community to be harassive and interruptive on my remote-type medical treatment. My complain is that this harassive and interruptive is beyond the disciplines of this two government agencies, and it has been unbearable to me.
So, I say, Can this generic legal concern be managed according to FBI and Justice Department's work protocols and disciplines? Those Chinese agents use their employment statuses to unauthorizely but forcefully stop my regular medical treatment has been very harmful to my biological health, not to mention how more harmful it can be from their enthusiam to conduct voluntary investiongation violently.
And, can medical providers' generic legal concern regarding if only making lawful money be addressed according to these licensed medical providers' standard procedures and protocols? Is it possible that medical and supporting staffs can imagine that they actual have some law professionals who work as their colleague(s) to protect them from this sort of concerns?
I refuse to receive voluntary & donation based medical care when I have my self-paid medicare availabe as lawful medicare program. So, from now on, I will address my patient-requests to self-pay remote-medical program that I am lawfully enrolled and has been supported by the US law representive FBI Agency and Federal Justice Department.
02-06-2020
1:The confusion if my 2004's Trust-inheriting can be valid.
- Related clarifications are in the numeric section “June of 2007's meeting” of <Three meetings in 2007 and related if I inherited confusion>, just scroll down to that numeric section.
- It is best to ask your own private friend who is in the attorney profession to read it as well.
- ---- January 11th, 2020
- It was since the famous "marriage proposal discussion" on July 1st of 2004 when a handsome young Mr. Rockfeller was teased.
- The innocent Mr. Rockefeller can not understand how it can be so unfair for a lady bride-to-be to bring her maiden family's same-size-wealth blessing to pass-down to her own blood birth-children but carry the groom's family name.
- The laugh was all around when the lady "bride-to-be" was negotiating, if getting married, how to self-indulge her-own-wealth while letting the "groom-to-be" to pay for all the thinkable and unthinkable for the entire marriage family for the years to come.
- Well, the "tragedy moment" happened when some Chinese parachutes jumped into the conversation to be the replacements of Rockefellers' such spending recipients, maybe from their understanding that negotiator does not have any wealth to be this teasing.
- Since that moment, I was completely dropped out of such conversation and got lost in the confusion and the public denial about if I have my own wealth from my Chinese birth grandfathers, while the entire Rockefeller names stuck in the bewilderment of why spending for years to come?
- This has been for the past big 15 years already. I still need to explain if I have my own money, while Rockefellers still fighting why it has to be their money to be spent?
- If you luckily still have that 07/01/2004's meeting-record, please verify this negotiation out and its prelude and its postlude, for some laughs and for some alerts.
- It is best to ask your own private friend who is in the attorney profession to read it as well.
- ----January 14th, 2020.
No, I did not publish any Rockefellers' money as I claimed.
All those companies I claimed have been doubted if this or that name's family wealth, the particular is the "Pejovic" company that I claimed as the third year's providing instruction company. This "Pejovic" company has never been owned by the "Pejovic" family historically has been clarified so that this company is not Rockefeller in-law's family wealth.
All those companies I claimed are not Rockefeller money because
- Each of all of those companies I claimed is not owned by any individual Rockefeller's name as an individual investment.
- Each of all of those companies I claimed is not owned by Rockefeller's names as the family names' shared investments.
- Each of all of those companies I claimed has never been owned by any Rockefeller's in-law's family names as the in-law's family names' shared investments.
- I am the Narylhn Khan has been verified, which proved that my wealth is from my birthmark Trust-inheriting has been the real story since 800 years ago.
- Reference: The confusion if I am an heir to ancient Chinese Emperors
- 我是乌纳可汗,这一身份被证实为真实有效究竟意味着什么?很简单的,这意味着我的财产来自家族胎记为条件的信托继承的说法从此有了事实上的依据,以胎记做为继承条件不只是那些我近代的爷爷们给我的信托。乌玉的方姓丈夫和乌玉的方姓儿子是我的两代方家家族胎记祖先,我承载他们父子两代也拥有的方家家族胎记是乌玉儿子指定我为乌玉的可汗爵位继承人的原因,乌玉是1260AD年代的历史人物忽必烈可汗的亲生女儿(不是孙女儿)。
3:The confusion about O'Connor's family name
There has been a lot of anger from O'Connor regarding my mentioning O'Connor names on my web blog. The reason I have to update my blog is to clarify some "why mention?", all the reason has been that I have been confronted fiercely or commented negatively, by O'Connor name's affiliated, regarding my inherited wealth I stated in my blog articles. So, I list my reasons why I agree there shouldn't be any mentioning for both parties:
1) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, that there shouldn't have any reason for any O'Connor affiliated to be confused about me stating my inherited wealth, nor for me to mention O'Connor name, which purely because I am not socially nor professionally associated with O'Connor name at all.
2) After the 2017's clarification of the American company's ownership as both don't own, there should be no reason for me to be agitated regarding O'Connor name's family wealth, and there should be no reason for any O'Connor's name affiliated to be confused with my money and my money spending-ship, purely because O'Connor's family wealth is not associated to my inherited wealth.
----Sept. 26th, 2019
4:The confusion about my money-spending-ship and my any paid-in-full service:
I assume, all police officers and law peoples, at least in the United States, would agree with me that any money lawful ownership confusion can only be resolved by calling the police to do the law investigation, or file a civil lawsuit.
I firmly believe nobody can replace the police on law investigation or enforcing laws,
and I firmly believe nobody can replace the Judicial court on clarifying the money lawful ownership's legal confusion.
----Sept. 26th, 2019