06-04-2017 Got To the Parents for a Child's providing

Heard on the radio , almost two digits numbered Charles Ford from one clan are featured in the radio program proclaiming them are sino-no-association clan.
My response: This is indeed a good sized Ford clan, rumored southerns or NYC-ers, escaped from Chinese culture in heavy Chinese immigration state. This is indeed magnificent for this whole clan all good Charles to raise all hands saying "no Chinese flats".

Heard this morning's featured a Ford's girl's anger.
My response:Every family has their own stories. It is comforting that she is with her mother.

Heard tons of saying this or that is my child need my providing.
My response: I only provide for child carry my blood as mother-child biological relationship.

Heard tons of assumption this or that Charles Ford father or no father my children as you heard on the radio this morning.
My response: I am provided for by my own money, my children are provided for either by their own father or by me. No imaginable reasons for those psychos like agitations knowing they have never been requested for any providing.
----June 4th, 2017

If there is a child, in your caring or in your imagination, assumed from me and some prominent people deserve to be provided for, please go to this prominent people directly instead of his relatives or everyone else, please present evidences of this child's blood association to this person. If you do not certain who father this child who is in your caring, but assume mothered by me, please contact 1800 number published on May 16, 2017 via same radio program broadcasting. Tina O'Connor, your father has been my entrusting attorney all these time for you to know never need to concern if my children can have any providing. The fund you let your father setup in your name using my money in 2015 is my fund. Just like you buy a house with a client's money won't make that house to be called yours.
----June 4th, 2017.


My money (III)

my money (Ii)

my money (I)

06-03-2017 (2) Not a joke but a reaon

The reason I should take it easy (translation from yesterday's blog article)

According my screams, that fund is my grandfather’s money I inherited by laws; According to O'Connor families' confusion, that fund should be owned by their grandfather's letter; According to some Chinese frustrations, that fund's ownership should already have changed by a "hello" phone call they made. According to all staffs and those over 400 colleagues Attorney O'Connor had worked with almost 200 years ago, they are(were) just money makers, letter readers, phone pickup-ers and harsh education deserved recipients, at most some bonus or tips and the rest just nothing to do with them(Just like my same last name cousins).

Heard saying of ownership according to contribution,
My response: I inherited what my grandfathers accumulated contributions through generations for over at least 1000 years till they hired people to look after in recent several hundred years. I  think investing laws and inheriting laws are reflections of all these understandings throughout the history.

----June 3, 2017 

06-03-2017 I stated every line honestly

Heard this morning's broadcasting of David Petraeus outburst cries.
My response: I repeat what I heard broadcast-ed: "This is to David Petraeus: All I said about you on my blog is why you keep stepping on my toes? " This is the blog you can read it all to verify if every line I stated is out of honesty. And I will continue enjoy my freedom of speech.
---June 3rd, 2017
Heard this morning's anger was because I scan through a KKR company's web site. He screamed on the radio and I can stop laughing here. That KKR company he is a chairman of has this web site with no address, no phone number and no email for entire company which basic fully expressed "no contact at all determination."
----June 3rd, 2017
Heard there is phone numbers listed on media page, I checked. ya. Do not remember if I checked this page the other day.----June 5th, 2017

Heard Boston Housing Authority "public media's threats".
My response: I speak for myself honestly. I have wealth inherited on June 30th of 2004 and entrusted on July 1st of 2004. This is a true statement. From my best knowledge, I live in my current BHA apartment was the arrangement agreed on July 1st of 2004. I clarify here that whole arrangement meeting was about how I am suppose to be provided for before my entrust finish, not some efforts to corner some prominent people to spend money against their wishes. I am and have been pissed off about this confusion from BHA. This confusion has huge impact on me being a resident in my current BHA complex.
----June 3rd, 2017

Heard announcement of O'Connor families confusion again yesterday.
My response: I already made myself clearly. I stated here again honestly that "That fund is my wealth I inherited on June 30th of 2004 is a true statement by laws".

This is to law enforcement if you read this blog: I am not sure if my impression is correct is the reason I put this here instead of sending you a letter. The impression I got is this radio program constantly corner people publicly to the outburst but not for public interests. I did comment some day ago why they do this radio program such a public proposal way knowing one party disfavor the proposal?
----June 3rd, 2017

I am accused of , as if, not acknowledging a Jessica is his wife, but she is not published so on his public introduction webpage and I already echoed his saying about motherhood in this blog. Heard my spending on July 1st of 2004 cause similar "effect", that was misunderstanding and confusion regarding my "inheritance day shopping spray". I do truly appreciate the reason caused misunderstanding and confusion.
----June 3rd, 2017

For the names taking care my inheritances for generations, the same historic reason in their mind, I will listen, and I will listen and I will listen.

----June 3rd, 2017