05-26-2017 About O'Connor families' confusion（中文）

Heard this morning's broadcasting about O'Connor families confusion, I will explain in English and in Chinese. 中文也在此页（听说了今天早上中国政府的中文谩骂)。

1: The father of first generation Senator O'Connor did not cash his representing attorney's paycheck for some time. That is O'Connor families argument of savings.
My response: First generation Senator O'Connor cashed all his and his father's savings.
Attorney O'Connor, father of first generation Senator O'Connor had been working with about 400 staff of the fund all his time representing the fund. His not-cashed salary had been recorded in company's(fund's) accounting book that entire time. His son, the first generation Senator O'Connor cashed it together with first payout of Mr. O'Connor's agreed upon providing.

2: First generation Senator O'Connor was asked to run Senator to serve United States was the reason of this agreed upon providing. This agreed upon providing is now in process of stopping because Senator is no longer a no pay public post.

3: The confusion of one representing attorney's salary saving can take over the company.
My response: It is impossible.
First of all, the company(fund) had been in America for 200 years already and employed 400 staff when first generation Attorney O'Connor from O'Connor's family started representing, even his salary may be very high, he was not CEO and his salary was not 400 times higher than any of his colleagues.
Second, Attorney O'Connors'(father's and son's) salaries were no comparison to the agreed upon providing size. Even today, Attorney O'Connor's attorney income is no comparison to the size of this agreed upon providing by representing my other fund which is about the similar size. My current providing size from this fund is bigger than entire O'Connor families historic "agreed upon" providing size.

4: O'Connor families never denied the company(fund) is my ancient grandfather's money 

5: Heard someone demand of this money for good cause even if it takes government's power.
My respond: This demand should go to US government if it is to benefit US citizens in general and in need of government's power to achieve.
 My lawful interest and my lawful rights, as US citizen, are under sworn protections of entire US government, that is every single government official and every single government employee. My freedom as US citizen, including my freedom of my own thoughts, is under sworn protection of entire US military that is every single enlisted in Uniform.
----May 26th, 2017

有OConnor 家族的困扰：

1：OConnor家有关存款的困扰：OConnor家的爷爷有段时间没拿他的那份律师工资存下的钱。
我的回应：第一代OConnor参议员已提取他和他父亲的所有存款。
第一代OConnor参议员的父亲做基金代表律师的整个时期都是和约400名公司（基金）的员工一起工作。他没领取的工资也都是在公司会计部门账本上清楚记载。第一代O‘Connor参议员在领取第一次“同意供给”支付时同时领取了他和他父亲在公司的所有存款。

2：第一代OConnor参议员是被邀请参选参议员为国家服务是当时“同意供给”的原因。现在这份“同意供给”已在停止程序就因为如今的参议员已不是没有工资代表富裕阶层的公职。

3： 有关在美国一份律师的工资存下来可以吃了所就职公司的困扰。
我的回应：没有任何可能。
首先：公司（基金）当时在美国（殖民时期）投资已有200多年之后才聘用第一个O’Connor家族的人做公司代表律师和当时公司同时聘用的400多名员工一起工作。第一代的O’Connor代表律师工资可能很高但他不是工资最高的CEO，他的工资也没高到是他当时任何同事的400倍。
其次：O'Connor律师父子(包括第一代OConnor参议员）的工资和公司（基金）规模根本没法比。现今还在代表我的另一个基金的O'Connor律师（第七代或第八代）的工资和他家族拿到的“同意供给”没法比，更不用说和公司的财务规模比。我目前的这家基金供给规模远大于O'Cpnnor家族的全部“同意供给”规模。

4： O’Connor家族从未否认也从未企图否认也不可能否认基金是我爷爷钱财。

5：听说就算通过政府权力，也一定要让我为一些好的原因付钱。
我的回应：如果是为一些好的原因而需要动用美国政府公权力来向美国公民普遍付钱，请向美国政府提出您的请求。
我本人作为美国公民的合法权力和合法利益受到整个美国政府的宣誓保护， 是每一个美国政府官员和每一个美国政府雇员的郑重就职宣誓誓言。
我本人作为美国公民的自由（包括我的思维自由）是受到整个美国军队的宣誓保护，是每一个穿美国军装的服役美国军人的郑重誓言。
----2017年5月26日。

就中国政府今天早上的一片“婊子”骂声。
我的回应：“捍卫中国的法制建设，捍卫中国是个法治国家”曾经是中华人民共和国政府为人民服务誓言的基础，不知这一届中国政府的誓言是什么。
----2017年月26日。